Funcţii discursive ale demonstrativelor în limba română actuală:
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | Romanian |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Bucureşti
Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti
2017
|
| Schriftenreihe: | Colecţia Lingvistică. Lingua
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis Literaturverzeichnis |
| Beschreibung: | 179 Seiten, 24 ungezählte Seiten 2 Illustrationen, 2 Diagramme |
| ISBN: | 9786061608874 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV044864954 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20180328 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 180313s2017 a||| |||| 00||| rum d | ||
| 020 | |a 9786061608874 |9 978-606-16-0887-4 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1028933383 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)OBVAC14539402 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a rum | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 | ||
| 084 | |a OST |q DE-12 |2 fid | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Gherghina, Mariana-Camelia |d ca. 20./21. Jh. |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1154459462 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Funcţii discursive ale demonstrativelor în limba română actuală |c Mariana-Camelia Gherghina (Călin) |
| 264 | 1 | |a Bucureşti |b Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti |c 2017 | |
| 300 | |a 179 Seiten, 24 ungezählte Seiten |b 2 Illustrationen, 2 Diagramme | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a Colecţia Lingvistică. Lingua | |
| 648 | 7 | |a Geschichte |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Rumänisch |0 (DE-588)4115807-6 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Demonstrativpronomen |0 (DE-588)4136404-1 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Rumänisch |0 (DE-588)4115807-6 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Demonstrativpronomen |0 (DE-588)4136404-1 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Geschichte |A z |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 24 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030259526&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 24 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030259526&sequence=000002&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Literaturverzeichnis |
| 940 | 1 | |n oe | |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030259526 | ||
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 400 |e 22/bsb |g 498 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804178391567433728 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | Cuprins
INTRODUCERE ............................................................................... 9
1. DEMONSTRATIVE ........................................................................ 17
1.1. Considerapi preliminare ............................................................. 17
1.2. Demonstrative!e in limba romana. Particularitáp ..................................... 19
1.3. Diferente intre sintagma nomínala de finita §i sintagma demonstrative................ 24
1.4. Trásáturi specifíce categoriei demonstrativului ..................................... 25
1.4.1. Reluarea - trásátura definitorie .................................................. 25
1.4.2. (Re)clasificarea .................................................................. 26
1.4.3. Alte caracteristici.............................................................. 26
1.4.3.1. Interpretarea generic ........................................................... 26
1.4.3.2. Valoarea de contrast a demonstrativului.......................................... 27
1.4.3.3. Lanfuri de referinfá ............................................................. 28
1.5. Inventarul demonstrativelor analízate ............................................... 30
2. DEIXIS §1 ANAFORÁ .................................................................... 33
2.1. Deixis — consider api preliminare ................................................... 33
2.1.1. Conceppi asupra deixisului ........................................................ 35
2.1.1.1. Defmirea deicticelor prin raportare la un origo: teoría lui Bühler............... 35
2.1.1.2. Defmirea deicticelor prin raportare la sensul lexical ........................... 37
2.1.1.3. Definirea deicticelor prin raportare la conceptele de referent §i referirá....... 37
2.1.2. Cadrul deictic primar / secundar (deplasat) ....................................... 38
2.1.3. Deictice simbolice §i deictice ostensive........................................... 39
2.1.4. Deixis personal / spapal / temporal / social / „descriptiv” / discursiv / textual . 40
2.1.4.1. Deixis personal ................................................................. 40
2.1.4.2. Deixis spapal.................................................................... 40
2.1.4.3. Deixis temporal ................................................................. 41
2.1.4.4. Deixis textual / deixis discursiv................................................ 41
2.1.5. Deixis §i indexicalitate........................................................... 42
2.2. Anafora - considerapi preliminare.................................................... 43
2.2.1. Antecedent §i referent............................................................. 44
2.2.2. Conceppi asupra anaforei .......................................................... 47
2.2.2.1. Conceppa substitutive............................................................ 47
2.2.2.2. Orientarea sintactico-formalá. Anáfora discursiva §i anaforá legatá ............. 49
2.2.2.3. Orientarea funcponal-textualá. Anafora ca fenomen textual ....................... 54
2.2.2.4. Orientarea pragmatic-cognitivá. Anafora ca fenomen memorial ..................... 56
2.3. Conceppi integrative asupra deixisului §i anaforei .................................. 60
2.3.1. Orientarea cognitivñ (memorialá) .................................................. 60
2.3.1.1. Teoría accesibilitápi: Ariel 1988, 1990, 2001 ................................... 61
2.3.1.2. Givenness Hierarchy.............................................................. 64
2.3.1.3. Modelul Strauss 2002 ............................................ 68
2.3.2. Studiul tipologic al lui Himmelmann ............................... 71
2.4. Deixis §i anaforä - o conceppe scalarä............................... 72
3. UZURI PRINCIPALE ALE DEMONSTRATIVELOR ................................. 77
3.1. Uzuri principale ale demonstrativului de apropiere /acesta/.......... 79
3.1.1. Utilizarea situaponalä................................................ 79
3.1.1.1. Funcpa situaponalä propriu-zisä (gestualä) ......................... 80
3.1.1.2. Fuñera simbólica ................................................... 85
3.1.1.3. Funcpa de incadrare generic ........................................ 87
3.1.1.4. Funcfia de clasificare colectiva (ä§tia)............................ 91
3.1.1.5. Funcpa expresivä (demonstrativul „afectiv”) ........................ 93
3.1.2. Utilizarea deicticä discursive ....................................... 96
3.1.2.1. Funcfia deicticä discursiva propriu-zisä............................ 96
3.1.2.2. Funcfia autoreferenpalä ........................................... 106
3.1.2.3. Funcpa deicticä metatextualä..................................... 109
3.1.3. Utilizarea anafórica .............................................. 110
3.1.3.1. Funcpa de reluare ............................................... 111
3.1.3.2. Funcpa de recategorizare (de reclasificare) ..................... 118
3.1.3.3. Funcfia de mencionare............................................ 121
3.2. Uzuri principale ale demonstrativului de depärtare /acela/........... 124
3.2.1. Utilizarea situaponalä............................................... 125
3.2.1.1. Func(ia situa(ionalä propriu-zisä (gestualä) .................... 126
3.2.1.2. Funcpa simbolicä .................................................. 129
3.2.1.3. Funcpa de incadrare generic ..................................... 135
3.2.1.4. Funcpa de evocare.................................................. 136
3.2.1.5. Funcpa expresivä................................................... 139
3.2.2. Utilizarea anaforicä - Funcpa de reluare........................... 142
4. UZURI SECUNDARE ALE DEMONSTRATIVELOR .................................... 147
4.1. Uzuri secundare ale demonstrativului de apropiere ................... 147
4.1.1. Utilizare situaponalä................................................ 147
4.1.1.1. Funcpa referenpalä mixtä ........................................ 147
4.1.1.2. Funcpa introductiva (prezentativä)................................. 148
4.1.2. Utilizare recogniponalä - Funcpa de identificare ................ 151
4.2. Uzuri secundare ale demonstrativului de depärtare.................... 153
4.2.1. Utilizare situaponalä - Funcpa de simulare a evocärii.............. 153
4.2.2. Utilizare anaforicä - Funcpa de recategorizare....................... 156
4.2.3. Utilizare recogniponalä - Functia de identificare ................... 157
CONCLUZII .................................................................. 159
SURSE/SIGLE ................................................................ 163
BIBLIOGRAFIE................................................................ 165
ANEXE....................................................................... 181
Bibliografie
Albu, Rodica, 2005, „On Reference”, în Hoarfâ Càràuçu, Luminifa (ed.), 2005c,
Pragmática pronumelui, Ia§i, Editura Cermi, p. 20-32.
Albu, Rodica, Ciobanu, Carmen, 2005, „Aspecte deictice ale temporalita(ii in viziunea
lingvisticii anglo-americane”, în Hoarfâ Càrâuçu (ed) 2005c: 9-19.
Alexander, David B., 2007, The Spanish Postnominal Demonstrative in Synchrony and
Diachrony. Dissertation, The Ohio State University, http://etd.ohioIink.edu/ (data
accesàrii: 21 ianuarie 2013, ora 16,55).
Anderson, Stephen R., Keenan, Edward L., 1985, „Deixis”, in Timothy Shopen (ed.)
Language Typology and Syntactic Description III: Grammatical Categories and
the Lexicon, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, p. 259-308.
Apothéloz, Denis, 1995, Rôle et fonctionnement de Vanaphore dans la dynamique
textuelle, Genève-Paris, Librairie Droz.
Apothéloz, Denis; Chanet, Catherine, 1997, „Défini et démonstratif dans les nominalisations”,
în Walter de Mulder, Liliane Tasmowski-De Ryck, Carl Vetters (eds.), Relations
anaphoriques et (incohérence, Amsterdam, Rodopi, 1997, p. 159-186.
Apothéloz, Denis, Reichler-Béguelin, Marie-José, 1999, „Interpretations and functions of
demonstrative NPs in indirect anaphora”, Journal of Pragmatics, 31, p. 363-397.
Akinci, Mehmet-Ali, 1992, Deixis et système verbal: comparaison entre le français et le
turc, Université Stendhal Grenoble III, U.F.R. des sciences du langage LIDILEM,
Directeur de recherches: Mr. Michel Maillard, http://ebookbrowsee.net (data
accesàrii: 7 mai 2014, ora 12,12).
Ariel, Mira, 1988, „Referring and Accessibility”, Journal of Linguistics, 24, p. 65-87.
Ariel, Mira, 1990, Accessing Noun-Phrase Antecedents, London - New York, Routledge.
Ariel, Mira, 1994, „Interpreting Anaphoric Expressons: A Cognitive versus a Pragmatic
Approach”, Journal of Linguistics, 30, nr. 1, p. 3-42.
Ariel, Mira, 1996, „Referring Expressions and the + / — Coreference Distinction”, în
Thorstein Fretheim, Jeanette K. Gundel (eds.), Reference and Referent
Accessibility, Amsterdam / Philadelphia, John Benjamins, p. 13-25.
Ariel, Mira, 2001, „Accessibility Theory: An Overview”, în Ted Sanders, Joost
Schilperoord, Wilbert Spooren, Text Representation: Linguistic and Psycholinguistic
Aspects, Amsterdam, John Benjamins Publishing, p. 29-87.
Avram, Mioara, [1986] 1997, Gramática pentru to(i, Bucureçti, Editura Humanitas.
Béguelin, Marie-José, 1989, „Anaphore, connecteurs et processus inférentiels”, C.
Rubattel (ed.), Modèles du discours. Recherches actuelles en Suisse romande,
Berne, Peter Lang, p. 303-336.
Béguelin, Marie-José, 1997, „Stratégies référentielles et variation”, Langue française,
115,p. 101-110.
166
MA RI ANA-C AMELIA GHERGHINA (CÂLIN)
Béguelin, Marie-José, 1998, „L’usage des SN démonstratifs dans les Fables de La
Fontaine”, Langue française, 120, nr. 1, p. 95-109.
Berea Gâgeanu, Elena, 1983, „Pronumele §i adjectivul demonstrativ în limba românâ
contemporanà. Evoluée §i sistem”, Limba românâ, XXXII, nr. 2, p. 104-115.
Berrendonner, Alain, 1990, „Attr acteurs”, Cahiers de linguistique française, 11, p. 149-158.
Berrendonner, Alain, [Reichler-]Béguelin, Marie-José, 1995, „Accords «associatifs»”,
Cahiers de praxématique, 24, p. 21-42.
Bhat, D. N. Shankara, 2007, Pronouns, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Bidu-Vrânceanu, Angela, Càlàraçu, Cristina, Ionescu-Ruxândoiu, Liliana, Mancaç,
Mihaela, Pana Dindelegan, Gabriela, 2001, Dicfionar de $tiin(e ale limbii,
Bucureçti, Editura Nemira.
Blackwell, Sarah Elizabeth, 1998, „Constraints on Spanish NP Anaphora: the Syntactic
versus the Pragmatic Domain”, Hispania, 81, nr. 2, p. 608-618.
Blackwell, Sarah Elizabeth, 2000, „Anaphora Interpretations in Spanish Utterances and
the Neo-Gricean Pragmatic Theory”, Journal of Pragmatics, 32, p. 389-424.
Blackwell, Sarah Elizabeth, 2003, Implicatures in Discourse. The case of Spanish NP
Anaphora, Amsterdam, John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Bosh, Paul, 1983, Agreement and Anaphora. A Study of the Role of Pronouns in Syntax
and Discourse, London, Academic Press.
Botley, S., McEnery, T., 2001, „Demonstratives in English: A Corpus-Based Study”,
Journal of English Linguistics, 29, p. 7-33.
Botoçineanu, Luminila, Hobjilâ, Angelica, 2002, „Fenomene lexico-semantice”, în Klaus
Bochmann, Vasile Dumbrava (eds.), Limba românâ vorbitâ în Moldova istoricâ,
volumul I, Leipzig, Leipziger Universitatsverlag, p. 149-158.
Bouchard, Denis, 1982, On the Content of Empty Categories, Submitted to the
Department of Linguistics and Philosophy in Partial Fulfillment of the
Requirements of the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy; Thesis Supervisor: Noam
Chomsky, www.ai.mit.edu (data accesârii: 21 august 2014, ora 20,55).
Bozickovic, Vojislav, 1995, Demonstrative Sense, Brookfield, Ashgate Publishing
Company.
Brassell, Emily, 2000, Demonstrative Anaphora: Forms and Functions in Full-Text
Scientific Articles, a Master s Paper for the M.S. in I.S. Degree, Advisor: Robert
Losee, http://www.google.ro/url?sa=t rct=j q=brassel (data accesârii: 12 martie
2013, ora 20,00).
Brown, Cheryl, 1983, „Topic Continuity in Written English Narrative”, în Ted Givôn
(ed.), Topic Continuity in Discourse: A Quantitative Cross-Language Study,
Amsterdam, John Benjamins, p. 313-341.
Brown, Keith (ed.), 2005, Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, Oxford, Elsevier.
Bühler, Karl, [1934] 2011, Theory of Language. The Representational Function of
Language, Amsterdam / Philadelphia, John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Bühler, Karl, 1982, „The Deictic Field of Language and Deictic Words”, în Robert J.
Jarvella, Wolfgang Klein, Speech, Place, and Action, Chichester NY, John Wiley
and Sons, p. 9-30.
FUNCJII DISCURSIVE ALE DEMONSTRATIVELOR ÎN LIMBA ROMÂNÂ ACTUALÂ
167
Busselle, R., Bilandzic, H., 2008, „Fictionality and Perceived Realism in Experiencing
Stories: A Model of Narrative Comprehension and Engagement”, Communication
Theory, 18, nr. 2, p. 255-280.
Charolles, Michel, 1987, „Contraintes pesant sur la constitution des chaînes de référence
comportant un nom propre”, Travaux du Centre de Recherches Sémiologiques, 53,
p. 29-55.
Charolles, Michel, Schnedecker, Catherine, 1993, „Coréférence et identité. Le problème
des référents évolutifs”, Langages, 112, p. 106-126.
Chomsky, Noam, 1965, Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, Cambridge, M. I. T. Press.
Chomsky, Noam, 1965, Syntactic Structures, London, The Hague; Paris, Mouton.
Chomsky, Noam, 1981, Lectures on Government and Binding, Foris, Dordrecht.
Chomsky, Noam, 1993, Lectures on Government and Binding, Berlin - New York,
Mouton de Gruyter.
Ciompec, Georgeta, Dominte, Constantin, Foràscu, Narcisa, Gupi-Romalo, Valeria,
Vasiliu, Emanuel, 1985, Limba românâ contemporanâ. Foneticâ, fonologie,
morfologie, edi(ie revizuità §i adâugità, Bucureçti, Editura Didacticà §i Pedagogicà.
Combettes, Bernard, 1979, „Les substituts”, în Bernard Combettes, Roberte Tomassone,
Jacques Fresson (eds.), Vers la maîtrise de la langue, Paris, Delagrave.
Corblin, Francis, 1985, Anaphore et interprétation des segments nominaux. Thèse d État,
Université de Paris, VII.
Corblin, Francis, 1987, Indéfini, défini et démonstratif, Genève, Librairie Droz S.A., p.
194-242.
Corblin, Francis, 1995, Les formes de reprise dans le discours. Anaphores et chaînes de
référence, Rennes, Presses Unniversitaires de Rennes.
Corblin, Francis, 1998, „Celui-ci anaphorique: un mentionnel”, Langue française, 120, p.
33-43.
Corblin, Francis, Laborde, Marie-Christine, 2001, „Anaphore nominale et référence
mentionnelle: le premier, le second, Tun et Vautre”, în Walter De Mulder, Co Vet,
Carl Vetters (eds.), Anaphores pronominales et nominales. Études pragma-
sémantiques, Amsterdam/New York, Rodopi, p. 99-121.
Comilescu, Alexandra, Nicolae, Alexandru, 2010, „Providing Syntactic Arguments that
Ellipsis Sites are Definite Descriptions”, în Rodica Zafiu, Alexandru Nicolae,
Adina Dragomirescu, Limba românâ. Controverse, delimitâri, noi ipoteze, vol I,
Bucureçti, Editura Universita|ii din Bucureçti, p. 37-50.
Cornish, Francis, 1986, Anaphoric Relations in English and French, London, Croom
Helm.
Cornish Francis, 1990, „Anaphore pragmatique, référence et modèles du discours , în
Georges Kleiber, J-E. Tyvaert (éds.), Lranaphore et ses domaines, Recherches
linguistiques XIV, Paris, Klincksieck, p. 81-96.
Comish, Francis, 1995, „Référence anaphorique, référence déictique et context prédicatif
et énonciatif’, Sémiotique, 8, p. 31-55.
Cornish, Francis, 1996, „«Antecedentless» Anaphors: Deixis, Anaphora, or What? Some
Evidence from English and French”, Journal of Linguistics, 32, p. 19-41.
Cornish, Francis, 1999, Anaphora, Discourse and Understanding, Oxford, Clarendon
Press.
168
MARIANA-CAMELIA GHERGHINA (CÂLIN)
Cornish, Francis, 2000, „L’accessibilité cognitive des référents, le Centrage d attention et
la structuration du discours: une vue d ensemble”, Verbum, XXII, nr. 1, p. 7-30.
Comish, Francis, 2001, „«Modal» That as Determiner and Pronoun: The Primacy of the
Cognitive-Interactive Dimension”, English Language and Linguistics, 5, nr. 2,
Cambridge University Press, p. 297-315, http://journals.cambridge.org.
Comish, Francis, 2006, „Text Analysis and Stylistics. Discourse Anaphora”, in Keith
Brown, Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, Oxford, Elsevier, p. 631-638.
Comish, Francis, 2007, „English Demonstratives: Discourse Deixis and Anaphora. A
Discourse-Pragmatic Account”, Nilsen, Randi. A.; Amfo, Appiah Nana Aba;
Borthen, Kaja (eds.), Interpretting Utterances; Pragmatics and its Interfaces.
Essays in Honor of Thor stein Fretheim, Oslo, Novus Press, p. 147-166.
Comish, Francis, 2008, „When Indexicals Target Discursively Subsidiary Information:
How Foregrounding and Backgrounding in Discourse Affect Indexical Reference”,
Discours [en ligne / on line], nr. 3, mis en ligne le 11 septembre 2008,
http://discours.revues.org, (data accesàrii: 28 august 2014).
Comish, Francis, 2009, „Indexicality by Degrees. Deixis, «Anadeixis» and (Discourse)
Anaphora, Symposium Quel sens pour la linguistique” (Organised to Mark the
Award of Docteur Honoris Causa to Professor Sir John Lyons, Université de
Toulouse-Le Mirail), http://w3.erss.univ-tlse2.fr/membres/cornish, (data accesàrii:
14 februarie 2013, ora 12,00).
Comish, Francis, 2010a, „Anaphora: Text-Based or Discourse-Dependent? Functionalist
vs. Formalist Accounts”, Functions of Language, Vol. 17, nr. 2, p. 207-241(35);
John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Comish, Francis, 2010b, «Indexicaux, discours et mémoire discursive: ce que les
premiers révèlent du second et de la troisième», Linx, p. 62-63 (mis en ligne le 04
décembre 2013, consulté le 14 février 2014), http://linx.revues.org/.
Comish, Francis, 2011, „Indexical Reference Within a Discourse Context: Anaphora,
Deixis, «Anadeixis» and Ellipsis”, Journee dEtude „Ellipse et anaphore Institut
Charles V, Université Paris 7, http://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/.
Creangà, Oxana, 2012, Conceptul de centru deictic în textul narativ. Tezâ de doctorat,
Universitatea de Stat din Moldova, http://www.cnaa (data accesàrii: 31 ianuarie
2013, ora 23,51).
Croitor, Blanca, „Pronumele” [secolul al XIX-lea], 2012, in Gheorghe Chivu, Gabriela
Pana Dindelegan, Adina Dragomirescu, Isabela Nedelcu, Irina Nicula (eds.), Studii
de istorie a limbii române. Morfosintaxa românei literare în secolele al XIX-lea -
al XX-lea, Bucure§ti, Editura Academiei Române, p. 141-146.
Crystal, David, 2008, A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics, sixth edition, Oxford,
Blackwell Publishing.
Dascàlu Jinga, Laurenpa, 2009, „Câteva mijloace de scurtare a enumeràrilor”, in Rodica
Zafiu, Blanca Croitor, Ana-Maria Mihail (eds.), Studii de gramaticâ. Omagiu
Doamnei Profesoare Valeria Gufu Romalo, Bucureçti, Editura Uni vers ita(ii din
Bucure§ti, p. 45-50.
De Mulder, Walter,Tasmowski-De Rick, Liliane, Vetters, Carl; 1997, Relations
anaphoriques et (incohérence, Amsterdam-Atlanta, Rodopi.
FUNCTII DISCURSIVE ALE DEMONSTRATIVE LOR IN LIMBA ROMÂNÀ ACTUALA
169
De Mulder, Walter, 1998, „Du sens des démonstratifs à la construction d’univers”,
Langue Française, 120, p. 21-33.
De Mulder, Walter, 2000, „Démonstratifs et accessibilité”, Verbum, XXII, nr. 1, p. 103-
125.
Dediu, Cristina, 2007, „Utilizàri ale pronumelor demonstrative §i ale adjectivelor
pronominale demonstrative în limba românà actualâ”, în Camélia Stan, Rodica Zaflu,
Alexandra Nicolae (eds.), Studii lingvistice. Omagiu profesoarei Gabriela Pana
Dindelegan, la aniversare, Bucureçti, Editura Universitajii din Bucureçti, p. 75-78.
Demol, Annemie, 2010, Les pronoms anaphoriques il et celui-ci, Bruxelles, Éditions
Duculot.
Diessel, Holger, 1999, Demonstratives. Form, Function, and Grammaticalization,
Amsterdam / Philadelphia, John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Diessel, Holger, 2005a, „Distance Contrasts in Demonstratives”, în Martin Haspelmath,
Matthew S. Dryer, David Gil, Bernard Comrie, The World Atlas of Language
Structures, Leipzig, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, p. 170-173.
Diessel, Holger, 2005b, „Pronominal and Adnominal Demonstratives”, în Martin
Haspelmath, Matthew S. Dryer, David Gil, Bernard Comrie, The World Atlas of
Language Structures, Leipzig, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary
Anthropology, p. 174-177.
Diessel, Holger, 2006, „Demonstratives”, în Keith Brown (ed.), Encyclopedia of
Language and Linguistics, Oxford, Elsevier, p. 430-435.
Dimitrescu, Florica, 1959a, „Note asupra sistemului deicticelor în limba românà”, Studii
§i cercetâri lingvistice, X, nr. 1, p. 55-61.
Dimitrescu, Florica, 1959b, „Deixis §i persoanà”, Studii §i cercetâri lingvistice, X, nr. 3,
p. 487-491.
Dimitrescu, Florica (ed.), 1978, Istoria limbii romane. Foneticâ, morfosintaxâ, lexic,
Bucureçti, Editura Didacticâ çi Pedagogicâ.
Dimitriu, Comeliu, 1994, Gramatica limbii române explicatâ. Morfologia, Ia§i, Editura
Virginia.
Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen, 2000, Sintaxa limbii române. Studii de sintaxâ comparata a
limbilor romanice, Bucureçti, Editura Univers.
Dokic, Jelena, 2012, „Indexicality”, în Albert Newen, Raphael van Riel (eds.), Identity,
Language, Mind. An Introduction to the Philosophy of John Perry, Stanford,
CSLI Publications, p. 13-31.
Duarte, David, 2011, „Linguistic Objectivity in Norm Sentences: Alternatives in Literal
Meaning”, Ratio Juris, 24, nr. 2, p. 112-139, http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com (data
accesârii: 21 ianuarie 2013, ora 16, 59).
Dubois, Jean, 1965, Grammaire structurale du français. Nom et pronom, Paris, Larousse.
Ducrot, Oswald, 1972, Dire et ne pas dire, Paris, Hermann.
Eagle, Christopher, 2006, „On This and That in Proust: Deixis and Typologies in À la
recherche du temps perdu”, MLN- Baltimore, vol. 121, nr. 4, p. 989-1008,
http://muse.jhu.edu (data accesârii: 25 martie 2013, ora 19,45).
Ehlich, Konrad, 1982, „Anaphora and Deixis: Same, Similar, or Different?”, în R.
Jarvella, W. Klein (eds.), Speech, Place and Action, Chichester — New York, John
Wiley, p. 315-338.
170
MARIANA-CAMELIA GHERGHINA (CÂLIN)
Emsel, Martina, Cuartero Otal, Juan, 2007, „Les fonctions discursives des déterminants
démonstratifs en espagnol, en français et en roumain”, în Martina Emsel, Juan
Cuartero Otal (eds.): Brücken Ubersetzen und interkulturelle Kommunikation.
Festschrift fur Gerd Wotjakzum 65. Geburtstag, Frankfurt am Main, Peter Lang, p.
235-249.
Fan, James, Barker, Ken, Porter, Bruce, 2005, „Indirect Anaphora Resolution as Semantic
Path Search”, Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Knowledge
Capture, p. 153-160, http://www.cs.utexas.edu (data accesàrii: 24 februarie 2013,
ora 9,20).
Felson, Nancy, 2004, „Introduction”, Arethusa, vol. 37, nr. 3, p. 253-266.
Fillmore, Charles J., [1971] 1975, Lectures on Deixis, Indiana University Linguistics
Club, Bloomington, Indiana.
Fillmore, Charles J., 1982, „Towards a Descriptive Framework for Spatial Deixis”,
Robert J. Jarvella, Wolfgang Klein (eds.), Speech, Place, and Action, Chiehester,
NY, John Wiley and Sons, p. 31-59.
Finn, Seth, 1995, „Measuring Effective Writing. Cloze Procedure and Anaphoric This”,
Written Communication, vol. 12, nr. 2, p. 240-266.
Fludernik, Monika, 1991, „Shifters and Deixis. Some Reflections on Jakobson, Jespersen,
and Reference”, Semiotica, 86, nr. 3/4, p. 193-230.
Fossard, Marion, 2006, „Aspects psycholinguistiques du traitement des démonstratifs:
résultats «croisés» en français et en anglais”, Langue française, 152, p. 82-95.
Fossard, Marion, Gamham, Alan, Cowles, Wind H., 2012, „Between Anaphora and
Deixis... The Resolution of the Demonstrative Noun Phrase That TV”, Language
and Cognitive Processes, 27 (9), p. 1385-1404.
Fretheim, Thorstein, Gundel, Jeanette K., 1996, Reference and Referent Accessibility,
Amsterdam/ Philadelphia, John Benjamins, http://www.ilg.uni-stuttgart.
Fricke, Ellen, 2002, „Origo, Pointing and Speech. The Impact of Co-Speech Gestures on
Linguistic Deixis Theory”, Gesture, 2, nr. 2, p. 207-226.
Fries, Carpenter, 1952, The Structure of English. An Introduction of the Construction of
English Sentence, New York, Harcourt, Brace.
Gary-Prieur, Marie-Noëlle, 1998, „La dimension cataphorique du démonstratif. Etude de
constructions à relative”, Langue française, 120, nr. 120, p. 44-49.
Gary-Prieur, Marie-Noëlle, Léonard, Martine, 1998, „Le démonstratif dans les textes et
dans la langue”, Langue Française, 120, p. 5-20.
Garrod, Simon, Sanford, Anthony J., 1982, „The Mental Representation of Discourse in a
Focussed Memory System: Implications for the Interpretation of Anaphoric Noun
Phrases”, Journal of Semantics, 1, p. 21-41.
Giurgea, Ion, 2008, „Pronume descriptive”, , în Gabriela Pana Dindelegan (ed.), Limba
românà: dinamica limbii, dinamica interpretârii, Bucureçti, Editura Universitapi
din Bucure§ti, p. 67-75.
Giurgea, Ion T., 2010, Pronoms, détérminants et ellipse nominale. Une approche
minimaliste, Bucureçti, Editura Universitàpi din Bucure§ti.
Givon, Talmy, 1983, Topic Continuity in Discourse, Amsterdam, John Benjamins.
Gorâscu, Adriana, 2005, „Deixis”, în GALR (II): 635-655.
FUNCTII DISCURSIVE ALE DEMONSTRATIVELOR ÎN LIMBA ROMÂNÂ ACTUALÂ
171
Green, Kate, 2006, „Deixis and anaphora: pragmatic approaches”, în Brown (ed.), 2006
415-417.
Greenbaum, Sidney, Quirk, Randolph, 1990, A Student Grammar of the English
Language, London, Longman.
Grosz, Barbara, Sidner, Candace, 1986, „Attentions, Intentions and the Structure of
Discourse”, Computational Linguistics, 12, p. 175-204.
Grosz, Barbara, Joshi, Arravint, Weinstein, Scott, 1995, „Towards a Computational
Theory of Discourse Interpretation”, Computational Linguistics, vol. 21, nr. 2, p.
203-225.
Gundel, Jeanette K., Hedberg, Nancy, Zacharski, Ron, 1988, „On the Generation and
Interpretation of Demonstrative Expressions”, in Proceedings of the International
Conference on Computational Linguistics, 12, p. 216-221,
http://dl.acm.org/citation, (data accesàrii: 14 mai 2014, ora 16, 15).
Gundel, Jeanette K., Hedberg, Nancy, Zacharski, Ron, 1993, „Cognitive Status and the
Form of Referring Expressions in Discourse”, Language, vol. 62, nr. 2, p. 274-307.
Gundel, Jeanette K., Hedberg, Nancy, Zacharski, Ron, 2000, „Statut cognitif et forme des
anaphoriques indirects”, Verbum, XXII, nr. 1, p. 79-102.
Guillot, Céline, 2006, „Le démonstratif en français - présentation”, Langue française,
152, p. 3-8.
Gufri Romalo, Valeria (ed.), 2005, Gramatica limbii române (GALR), vol I-II, Bucureçti,
Editura Academiei Române.
Gufri Romalo, Valeria, 2008, Corectitudine §i greçealâ (édifia a Ill-a), Bucureçti, Editura
Humanitas.
Halliday, Michael A. K., Hassan, Ruqaiya, 1976, Cohesion in English, London, Longman
Group Limited.
Halliday, Michael A. K., 1985, An Introduction to Functional Grammar, London,
Edward Arnold.
Halvorsen, Ame, 1994, „Le pronom neutre asta et le marquage de l’objet en roumain. Am
trait s-o vedem §i pe asta F, Revue romane, 29, nr. 2, p. 173-194.
Hanks, William F., 1990, Referential Practice, Chicago, The University of Chicago
Press.
Hanks, William F., 1992, „The Indexical Ground of Deictic Reference”, în Alessandro
Duranti, Charles Goodwin (eds.), Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive
Phenomenon, Cambridge UK, Cambridge University Press, p. 46-76.
Hayashi, Makoto, 2004, „Projection and Grammar: Notes on the ‘Action-Projecting’ Use
of the Distal Demonstrative Are in Japanese”, Journal of Pragmatics, 36(8),
p.1337-1374. [Retipârit în P. Drew and J. Heritage (eds.), 2006, Conversation
Analysis, vol. 3: Turn Design and Action Formation, London, Sage, p. 189-232].
Herman, Vimala, 1999, „Deictic Projection and Conceptual Blending in Epistolarity”,
Poetics today, 20, nr. 3, p. 523-542.
Herman, Vimala, 1999, „Discourse and Time in Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet”,
Language and literature, nr. 8, p. 143-161.
Himmelmann, Nikolaus Paul, 1996, „Demonstratives in Narrative Discourse: A
Taxonomy of Universal Uses”, în Barbara Fox (ed.), Studies in Anaphora,
Amsterdam, John Benjamins, p. 205-254.
172
MARIANA-CAMELIA GHERGHINA (CÁLIN)
Hoartá Cáráu$u, Luminita, 2001, Probleme de morfologie a limbii románe, Ia§i, Editura
Cermi.
Hoartá Cáráusu, Luminita, 2005a, „Aspecte ale subiectivitátii limbajului”, in Hoartá
Cáráu?u (ed.) 2005c: 33-57.
Hoartá Cáráu§u, Luminita, 2005b, „Firneedle pragmatice ale pronumelui in limba románá
actúala”, in Hoartá Cáráu§u (ed.) 2005c: 209-222.
Hoar^a Cáráusu, Luminita, 2005c, Pragmática pronumelui, Ia§i, Editura Cermi.
Hoartá Cáráusu, Luminita, 2007, Dinámica morfosintaxei $i pragmaticii limbii románe
actúale, Ta§i, Editura Cermi.
Hoartá Cáráusu, Luminita, 2008, „Retoricá §i pragmaticá publicisticá. Figuri de
construcfie §i strategii persuasive in titlurile de articole din presa románeascá
actualá”, Philologica Jassyensia, IV, nr. 1, p. 49-59.
Hoartá Cáráu§u, Luminita, 2009, Teorii §i practici ale comunicara, Ia§i, Editura Cermi.
Hobjilá, Angelica, 2002-2003, „Conceptul de deictic”, Anuar de lingüistica §i istorie
lit erará, XLII-XLIII, p. 75-85.
Hobjilá, Angelica, 2003, Microsistemul deicticelor in limba románá vorbitá neliterará
actualá, Ia§i, Casa Editorialá Demiurg.
Hobjilá, Angelica, 2004a, „Intersubiectivitatea $i ambiguitatea - premise ale studierii
deicticelor, Analele §tiinfifice ale Institutului de Studii Europene ,,§tefan Lupa§cu
- Ia§i, Seria Secvenfe praxio-logice, II, nr.l, 2004, Politic §i juridic in context
administrate, p. 15-22.
Hobjilá, Angelica, 2004b, „Traditie §i inovatie ín studiul deicticelor limbii románe”, in
Gabriela Paná Dindelegan (ed.), Tradifie §i i no va fie in studiul limbii románe.
Actele celui de-al 3-lea Colocviu de Limba románá (27-28 noiembrie 2003),
Bucure§ti, Editura Universitátii din Bucure§ti, 2004, p. 147-156.
Hobjilá, Angelica, 2005a, „Deicticele pronominale in limba románá vorbitá neliterará
actualá”, in Hoartá Cáráusu (ed.) 2005c: 223-298.
Hobjilá, Angelica, 2005b, „Deicticitatea - coordonatá semantico-pragmaticá a
comunicárii interumane”, Analele Universitáfii ,,§tefan cel Mare” Suceava, Seria
§tiinte ale educatiei, Tomul IV, nr. 1, p. 186-196.
Hobjilá, Angelica, 2006, „Valente particulare ale deicticitátii in limba románá”, ín
Gabriela Paná Dindelegan (ed.), Limba románá - Aspecte sincronice §i diacronice.
Actele celui de-al 5-lea Colocviu al Catedrei de Limba románá (8-9 decembrie
2005), Bucure^ti, Editura Universitátii din Bucure§ti, 2006, p. 121-127.
Huang, James, C-T., 1984, „On the Distribution and Reference of Empty Pronouns”,
Linguistic Inquiry, 15, nr. 4, p. 531-574.
Huang, Yan, 2000, Anaphora. A Cross-linguistic Approach, Oxford, Oxford University
Press.
Huddleston, Rodney D., 1984, Introduction to the Grammar of English, Cambridge UK,
Cambridge University Press.
Ilian, Hinca, 2003, „Postmodernism §i eu creator - Orbitor de Mircea Cártarescu”,
Analele Universitáfii de Vest din Timisoara, Serie Philologie, p. 59-80,
http://waboc.free.fr/ilinca (data accesárii: 23 februarie 2013, ora 10,48).
Ionescu-Ruxándoiu, Liliana, 1991, Narafiune si dialog in proza románeascá, Bucuresti,
Editura Academiei Románe.
FUNCTII DISCURSIVE ALE DEMONSTRATIVELORIn LIMBA ROMÂNÂ ACTUALÂ
173
Ionescu-Ruxandoiu, Liliana, 1995, Conversafia: structuri yz strategii. Sugestii pentru o
pragmaticâ a românei vorbite, Bucure§ti, Editura All.
Iordan, Iorgu, 1956, Limba românâ contemporanâ, Bucure§ti, Editura Ministerului
Invâîàmântului.
Iordan, Iorgu, 1975, Stilistica limbii romane, Bucureçti, Editura Çtiinfificà.
Iordan, Iorgu, Gufii Romalo, Valeria, Niculescu, Alexandru, 1967, Structura morfologicâ
a limbii române contemporane, Bucure§ti, Editura §tiinfifica.
Iordan, Iorgu, Robu, Vladimir, 1978, Limba românâ contemporanâ, Bucureçti, Editura
Didacticâ çi Pedagogicâ.
Irimia, Dumitru, 1997, Gramatica limbii române, Ia§i, Editura Polirom.
Izverna-Tarabac, Irina, 2008, Anafora, între gramaticâ §i pragmasemanticâ, Suceava,
Editura Universitâfii.
Jespersen, Otto, 1939, Essentials of English Grammar, New York, Holt.
Jespersen, Otto, [1922] 1964, Language: its Nature, Development and Origin, New York,
Norton Library.
Kaplan, Jeffrey P., [1989] 1995, English Grammar: Principles and Facts, Englewood
Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall.
Kaplan, David, 1989, „Demonstratives”, în Joseph Almog, John Perry, Howard Wettstein
(eds.), Themes from Kaplan, New York, Oxford University Press, p. 481-565.
Karttunen, Lauri, 1976, „Discourse Referents”, în James D. McCawley (ed.), Syntax and
Semantics, vol. VII, London, Academic Press, p. 363-385.
Kempson, Ruth, 1986, „Definite NPs and Context-Dependence: a Unified Theory of
Anaphora”, în Terry Myers (ed.), Reasoning and Discourse Processes, London,
Academic Press, p. 209-239.
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine, 1980, Lf énonciation. De la subjectivité dans le langage,
édifia a doua, Paris, Armand Colin.
Kçsik, Marek, 1989, La cataphore, Paris, Presses Universitaires de France.
Kirsner, Robert S., 1979, „Deixis in Discourse: an Exploratory Quantitative Study of the
Modem Dutch Demonstrative Adjectives”, în Talmy Givon (ed.), Syntax and
Semantics, New York, Academic Press, p. 355-375.
Kirsner, Robert S., 1993, „From Meaning to Message in Two Teories: Cognitive and
Saussurean Views of the Modem Dutch Demonstratives”, în Richard A. Geiger,
Brygida Rudzka-Ostyn (eds.), Conceptualizations and Mental Processing in
Language, Berlin, Mouton de Gruyter, p. 81-114.
Kleiber, Georges, 1983, „Les démonstratifs (dé)montrent-ils? Sur le sens référentiel des
adjectifs et pronoms démonstratifs”, Le Français Moderne, 51, 2, p. 99-117.
Kleiber, Georges, 1988, „Peut-on définir une catégorie générale de fanaphore?”, Vox
Romanica, 47, p. 1-14.
Kleiber, Georges, 1990, „Quand il n a pas d’antécédent”, Langages, 97, p. 24-50.
Kleiber, Georges, 1991a, ,,Celui-ci/là ou comment montrer du nouveau avec du déjà
connu”, Revue québécoise de linguistique, vol. 21, nr. 1, p. 123-169.
Kleiber Georges, 1991b, „Du nom propre non modifié au nom propre modifié: le cas de
la détermination des noms propres par l’adjectif démonstratif’, Langue française,
92, nr. 92, p. 82-103.
Kleiber, Georges, 1994, Anaphores et pronoms, Louvain-la-Neuve, Duculot.
174
MARIANA-CAMELIA GHERGHINA (CÂLIN)
Kleiber, Georges, 1998, „Les démonstratifs à Y épreuve du texte ou sur Cette côte de la
baie de VArguenon”, Langue française, 120, nr. 1, p. 77-94.
Kleiber, Georges, 2001a, L’anaphore associative, Paris, Presses Universitaires de France.
Kleiber, Georges, 2001b, „Regards sur l anaphore et la Givenness Hierarchy”, în Hans
Kronning, Coco Norén, Novén Bengt (eds.), Langage et référence. Mélanges
offerts à Kerstin Jonasson à Voccasion de ses soixante ans, Uppsala, Uppsala
University, p. 311-322.
Lakoff, Robert, 1974, „Remarks on This and Thaf Anthony Bruck, Michael W. LaGaly,
Robert A. Fox (eds.), Papers from the Tenth Regional Meeting of the Chicago
Linguistics Society, Chicago, Chicago Linguistics Society, p. 345-356.
Lambrecht, Knud, 1994, Information Structure and Sentence Form, Cambridge,
Cambridge University Press.
Langacker, Ronald, 1969, „On Pronominalisation and the Chain of Command”, în D. A.
Reiber, S. A. Shane (eds.), Modern Studies in English: Readings in
Transformational Grammar, Englewood Clifs, Prentice-Hall, p. 160-186.
Lees, Robert B., Klima, Edward, 1963, „Rules for English Pronominalisation”,
Language, 39, p. 17-28.
Leech, Geoffrey, Svartvik, Jan, 1975, A Communicative Grammar of English, London,
Longman.
Léonard, Martin, 1998, „Démonstratifs balzaciens. Personnage et temporalité”, Langue
française, vol. 120, nr. 120, p. 66-76.
Levinson, Stephen C., 1983, Pragmatics, New York, Cambridge University Press.
Levinson, Stephen C., 1987, „Pragmatics and the Grammar of Anaphora”, Journal of
Linguistics, nr. 23, p. 379-434.
Levinson, Stephen C., 2000, Presumptive Meanings. The Theory of Generalised
Conversational Implicature, Cambridge, Massachusetts, MIT Press.
Levinson, Stephen C., 2004, „Deixis and Pragmatics”, in Laurence Horn, Gregory Ward
(eds.), Handbook of Pragmatics, Oxford, Blackwell, p. 1-63,
http://pubman.mpdl.mpg (data accesârii: 19 februarie 2013, ora 18,00).
Lieberman, Mark, 2008, Affective Demonstratives, Language Log, http://languagel
og.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=674, (data accesârii: 21 ianuarie 2013, ora 10,00).
Linde, Charlotte, 1979, „Focus of Attention and the Choice of Pronouns in Discourse”,
in Talmy Givon (ed.), Discourse and Syntax (Syntax and Semantics, 12), New
York, Academic. Press, p. 337-354.
Lintvelt, Jap, 1994, Punctul de vedere. încercare de tipologie narativâ, trad, rom.,
Bucureçti, Editura Univers.
Lyons, John, 1977, Semantics, vol. II, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Lyons, John, 1980, Sémantique linguistique, Paris, Larousse.
Maclaran, R., 1982, „On Two Asymmetrical Uses of the Demonstrative Determiners in
English”, Linguistics, 18, p. 803-820.
Maillard, Michel, 1974, „Essai de typologie des substituts diaphoriques”, Langue
française, 21, p. 55-71.
Manea Hoancà, Dana, 1991, „Funcpi semantico-pragmatice ale demonstrativelor acest §i
acel în limba românâ contemporanà”, Analele Universitâfii „ Ovidius ” Constanta,
séria Filologie, vol. II, p. 58-77.
FUNCTII DISCURSIVE ALE DEMONSTRATIVELOR ÍN LIMBA ROMANA ACTUALA
175
Manea, Dana, 2012, „Pronumele” [secolul al XX-lea], in Gheorghe Chivu, Gabriela Pana
Dindelegan, Adina Dragomirescu, Isabela Nedelcu, Irina Nicula (ed.), Studii de
istorie a limbii románe. Morfosintaxa románei literare in secolele al XIX-lea - al
XX-lea, Bucure§ti, Editura Academiei Romane, p. 503-506.
Manoliu-Manea, Maria, 1968, Sistemática substitutelor in romána contemporaná
standard, Bucure^ti, Editura Academiei, p. 29-36.
Manoliu-Manea, Maria, 1993, Gramática, pragmasemanticá §i discurs, Bucure§ti,
Editura Litera.
Manoliu-Manea, Maria, 1995, „From Deixis ad Oculos to Discourse Markers via Deixis
ad Phantasma”, Revue roumaine de linguistique, XL, 1-3, p. 57-73.
Manoliu-Manea, Maria, 2001, „The Conversational Factor in Language Change. From
Prenominal to Postnominal Demonstratives”, in Laurel J. Brinton (ed.), Selected
Papers from the 14th International Conference on Historical linguistics,
Amsterdam, John Benjamins, p. 187-205.
Matras, Yaron, 1998, „Deixis and Deictic Oppositions in Discourse: Evidence from
Romani”, Journal of pragmatics, 29, p. 393-428.
Mey, Jacob L., 2009, Concise Encyclopedia of Pragmatics (second edition), Oxford,
Elsevier Ltd.
Mihail, Ana-Maria, 2009, „Utilizadle tiparului afectiv (Det) Nj de N2(nebunul de Ion) in
limba romana actúala”, in Gabriela Pana Dindelegan (ed.), Dinámica limbii
románe actúale. Aspecte gramaticale §i discursive, Bucure§ti, Editura Academiei
Románe, p. 95-112.
Moeschler, Jacques; Reboul, Anne, 1999, Dicfionar enciclopedic de pragmática, trad,
rom., Cluj, Editura Echinox.
Moldovan, Aurel Teodor, 2009, Drept penal. Partea generala, Bra§ov, Editura Lux
Libris.
Munteanu, Mihaela, 2006, Semántica textului §i problema referinfei nomínale, Cluj-
Napoca, Editura Accent.
Nedelcu Isabela, 2005, „Mijloace de exprimare a partitivului in limba romána”, in
Gabriela Pana Dindelegan (ed.), Limba romána — Structurá §i funcionare,
Bucure^ti, Editura Universitápi din Bucure§ti, p. 153-160.
Nicolae, Alexandru, 2011, Structuri cu elipsá in limba romána. Perspective comparative,
Conferinfa la Academia Romána, Bucure^ti.
Nicolae, Alexandru, 2013, „Demonstratives”, in Gabriela Pana Dindelegan (ed.), The
Grammar of Romanian (GR), Oxford, Oxford University Press, p. 294-300.
Nicula, Irina, 2008, „Utilizan pragmatice ale demonstrativului in limba vorbitá actúala:
asta vs aceasta”, in Gabriela Pana Dindelegan (ed.), Limba romána. Dinámica
limbii, dinámica interpretara, Bucure§ti, Editura Universitápi din Bucure§ti, p.
127-132.
Nicula, Irina, 2009, „Dinámica pronumelor §i a adjectivelor demonstrative in limba
romána actúala”, in Gabriela Pana Dindelegan (ed.), Dinámica limbii románe
actúale. Aspecte gramaticale §i discursive, Bucure§ti, Editura Academiei Románe,
p. 181-194.
Niculescu, Alexandru, 1978, Individualitatea limbii románe intre limbile romanice,
Bucure^ti, Editura §tiinpficá §i Enciclopédica.
176
MARIANA-CAMELIA GHERGHINA (CÂLIN)
Niimura, Tomomi, Hayashi, Brenda, 1994, „English and Japanese Demonstratives: A
Contrastive Analysis of Second Language Acquisition”, Issues in Applied
Linguistics, 5(2), p. 327-351.
Nishimura, Chiharu, 1996, Demonstratives in Academic Written English Discourse.
Master s Thesis, University of California, Los Angeles.
O’Grady, William, 1987, „The Interpretation of Korean Anaphora: the Role and
Representation of Grammatical Relations”, Language, vol. 63, nr. 2, p. 251-277.
Oroian, Elvira, 2006, Anafora §i catafora ca fenomene discursive, Cluj-Napoca, Editura
Risoprint.
Pagurschi, Fiorina, 2010, Interpreting Pronouns in Discourse Representation Theory
(teza de doctorat nepublicatä), Universitatea din Bucureçti.
Panä Dindelegan, Gabriela, 2003, Elemente de gramaticä. Dificultäfi, controverse, noi
interpretäri, Bucureçti, Editura Humanitas.
Panä Dindelegan, Gabriela (ed.), 2010, Gramatica de bazä a limbii romane (GBLR),
Bucureçti, Editura Univers Enciclopedic.
Panä Dindelegan, Gabriela, 2012, „Feminine Singular Pronouns with Neutral Value”,
Revue roumaine de linguistique, LVII, nr. 3, p. 249-261.
Peirce, Charles Sanders, 1990, Semnificafe §i acfiune, trad, rom., Bucureçti, Editura
Humanitas.
Philippe, Gilles, 1998, „Les démonstratifs et le statut énonciatif des textes de fiction:
l’exemple des ouvertures de roman”, Langue française, nr. 20, p. 51-65.
Popârlan, Sabina, 2002, „Étude comparative des structures anaphoriques (pro)nominales
et verbales en français, hindi et roumain”, Revue Roumaine de Linguistique,
XLVII, nr. 1-4, p. 29-46.
Popârlan, Sabina, 2010, L anaphore verbale: domaine typologique français, hindi et
roumain, Bucureçti, Editura Universität din Bucureçti.
Pottier, Bernard, 1958, Introduction à l étude de la philologie hispanique, Bordeaux-
Paris, Faculté des Lettres de Bordeaux.
Potts, Cristopher, Schwarz, Florian, 2010, „Affective This”, Linguistic Issues in
Language Technology, vol. 3, nr. 5, p. 1-30.
Prince, Ellen, 1981, „On the Inferencing of Indefinite-This NPs’ în Aravind K. Joshi,
Rachel Reiehman, Getting Computers to Talk Like You and Me: Discourse
Context, Focus and Semantics (an AIN modelf Cambridge-Massachusetts, MIT
Press, p. 231-250.
Reboul, Anne, 1989, „Résolution de l anaphore pronominale: sémantique et / ou
pragmatique”, Cahiers de linguistique française, 10, p. 77-100.
Reboul, Anne, 1990, „Rhétorique de l anaphore”, în Georges Kleiber, Jean-Emmanuel
Tyvaert (eds.), L anaphore et ses domaines, Paris, Klincksieck, p. 279-300.
Reboul, Anne, 1997, „(In)cohérence et anaphore: mythes et réalité”, Walter De Mulder,
Liliane Tasmowski-De Ryck, Carl Vetters, Relations anaphoriques et
(incohérence, Amsterdam, Éditions Rodopi, p. 297-314.
Reboul, Anne, Moeschler, Jacques, 2001, Pragmatica, azi: o noua çtiinfà a comunicarii,
trad, rom., Cluj, Editura Echinox.
Reboul, Anne, Moeschler, Jacques, 2010, Pragmatica discursului: de la interpretarea
enunfului la interpretarea discursului, Bucureçti, Institutul European.
FUNCTII DISCURSIVE ALE DEMONSTRATIVELORÎN LIMBA ROMÂNÂ ACTUALÂ
177
Reichler-Béguelin, Marie-José, 1989, „Anaphore, connecteurs et processus inférentiels”,
în Christian Rubattel (ed.), Modèles du discours. Recherches actuelles en Suisse
romande, Berne, Peter Lang, p. 303-336.
Reichler-Béguelin, Marie-José, 1993, „Anaphores associatives non lexicales:
incomplétude macrosyntaxique?”, în Stanislaw Karolak, Teresa Muryn
(eds.), Complétude et incomplétude dans les langues romanes et slaves. Actes du
6e Colloque international de Linguistique romane et slave (Cracovie, 29 sept.-3
oct. 1991), Cracovie, p. 327-379.
Reichler-Béguelin, Marie-José, 1994, „L encodage du texte écrit. Normes et déviances
dans les procédés référentiels et dans le marquage de la cohésion”, în Ludo
Verhoeven, Ana Teberosky (eds.), Proceedings of the Workshop on Understanding
early literacy in a Developmental and Cross-Linguistic Approach, vol. II,
Strasbourg, European Science Foundation, p. 175-204.
Reichman-Adar, Rachel, 1984, „Technical Discourse: the Present Progressive Tense, the
Deictic That, and Pronominalization”, Discourse Processes, 7, p. 337-369.
Reinhart, Tanya, 1976, The Syntactic Domain of Anaphora, Ph. D. Dissertation, MIT.
Riddle, Elizabeth, 2010, „Vantage Theory and the Use of English Demonstrative
Determiners with Proper Nouns”, Language Sciences, 32, p. 225-240.
Roven(a-Frumu§ani, Daniela, 2004, Analiza discursului. Ipoteze $i ipostaze, Bucure§ti,
Editura Tritonic.
Ross, John R., 1969 [1967], „On the Cyclic Nature of English Pronominalisation”, în D.
A. Reiber, S. A. Shane (eds.), Modern Studies in Linguistics, Englewood Cliffs,
Prentice-Hall, p. 187-200.
Saeed, Aziz Thabit, 2008, „Some Pragmatic Considerations in the Choice between This
or That in English Narrative Discourse”, Studia Anglica Posnaniensia:
International Review of English Studies, 44, p. 391-407.
Safir, Ken, 2004, The Syntax of Anaphora, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Semino, Elena, 2011, „Deixis and Fictional Minds”, Style, 45, nr. 3, p. 418-440.
Sidner, Candace L., 1983, „Focusing in the Comprehension of Definite Anaphora”, în
Michael Brady, Robert C. Berwick (eds.), Computational Models of Discourse,
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, p. 267-330.
Schnedecker, Catherine, 1997, Nom propre et chaîne de référence, Metz, Université de
Metz.
Sells, Peter, Wasow, Thomas, 2005, „Anaphora”, în Brown (ed.) 2005: 17-25.
Sperber, Dan, Wilson, Deirdre, 1986, Relevance: Communication and Cognition, Oxford,
Blackwell.
Sperber, Dan, Wilson, Deirdre, 1989, La pertinence: communications et cognition
(traducere din englezâ de Abel Gerschenfeld et Dan Sperber), Paris, Edition de
Minuit.
Strauss, Susan, 1993, „Why This and That are not Complete Without If în Katharine
Beals (ed.), Proceedings from the 29th Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society,
CLS29, 1 CSLI, Stanford, p. 403-417.
Strauss, Susan, 2002, „This, That and It in Spoken American English: A Demonstrative
System of Gradient Focus”, Language Sciences, 24, p. 131-152.
178
MARIANA-CAMELIA GHERGHINA (CÂLIN)
Sun, Jung, 2009, „A Corpus-Based Study of Developmental Stages of Demonstratives in
Chinese English Major’s Writings”, Asian Social Science, 5, nr. 11, p. 117-126.
§tefanescu, Alex, 2004, „La o noua lecturâ: Marin Preda - Cel mai iubit dintre
pàmânteni”, România literarâ, nr. 10, http://www.romlit.ro (data accesârii 20 mai
2014, ora 12,37).
Taki, Mariko, 2010, Anaphoric Demonstratives in Spoken and Written Japanese
Discourse (a Thesis Presented to the Faculty of San Diego State University),
http://sdsu-dspace.calstate (data accesârii: 16 iunie 2013, ora 9,50).
Tasmowski-De Ryck, Liliane, 1990, „Les démonstratifs français et roumains dans la
phrase et dans le texte”, Langages, 97, p. 82-99.
Tasmowski-De Ryck, Liliane, 1994, „Référents et relations anaphoriques”, Revue
Roumaine de Linguistique, XXXIX, 5-6, p. 456-478.
Tasmowski-De Ryck, Liliane, 2001, „De-ci et de-là”, în Alexandra Cuniîâ, Janeta
Dràghicescu (eds.), Linguistique et alentours. Hommage à Teodora Cristea,
Bucureçti, Editura Universitàpi din Bucureçti, p. 353-368.
Todorov, Tzvetan, 1966, „Les catégories du récit littéraire”, Communication, 8, nr. 8, p.
125-151.
Vasilescu, Andra, 2005, „Pronumele”, în GALR (I): 181-288.
Vasilescu, Andra, 2009, „Elemente de dinamicà discursivâ a pronumelui”, în Gabriela
Pana Dindelegan (ed.), Dinamica limbii române actuale. Aspecte gramaticale §i
discursive, Bucureçti, Editura Academiei Române, p. 115-162.
Vasilescu, Andra, 2012a, „Deicticele discursive”, în Oana Chelaru-Murâruç, Maria
Cvasnîi-Câtânescu, Claudia Ene, Camélia Uçurelu, Rodica Zafîu (eds.), Text §i
diseurs: omagiu Mihaelei Manca§, Bucureçti, Editura Universitâpi din Bucureçti,
p. 537-552.
Vasilescu, Andra, 2012b, „Deicticele empatetice”, în Mihaela Constantinescu, Gabriela
Stoica, Oana U|à Bârbulescu (eds.), Modernitate §i interdisciplinaritate în
cercet area lingvisticâ, Omagiu doamnei prof es or Liliana lonescu Ruxândoiu,
Bucureçti, Editura Universitàpi din Bucureçti, 2012, p. 569-586.
Vlad, Carmen, 1994, Sensul, dimensiune es enfialâ a textului, Cluj-Napoca, Editura Dacia.
Vlad, Carmen, 2000, Textul aisberg, Cluj, Casa Carpi de Çtiin{â.
Vuillaume, Marcel, 1990, Grammaire temporelle des récits, Paris, Minuit.
Wald, Benji, 1983, „Referents and Topic Across Discourse Units: Observations from
Current Vernacular English”, în Flora Klein-Andrew (ed.), Discourse Perspectives
on Syntax, New York, Academic Press, p. 91-116.
Walker, Marilyn, Prince, Ellen, 1996, „A Bilateral Approach to Givenness: a Hearer-
Status Algorithm and a Centering Algorithm”, în Fretheim, Gundel (eds.) 1996:
291-306.
Warner, Chantelle, 2009, „Speaking from Experience: Narrative Schemas, Deixis and
Authenticity Effects in Verena Stefan*s Feminist Confession Shedding”, Language
and Literature, 18, p. 6-23.
Webber, Bonnie, Sag, Ivan, Elements of Discourse Understanding; Cambridge,
Cambridge University Press, 231-250.
Yang, Youwen, 2011, „A Cognitive Interpretation of Discourse Deixis”, în Theory and
Practice in Language Studies, 1, nr. 2, p. 128-135, Finland, Academy Publisher.
FUNCTII DISCURSIVE ALE DEMONSTRATIVE LOR IN LIMBA ROMÂNÂ ACTUALÂ
179
Zafiu, Rodica, 2003, ,,7w generic în limba românà actúala”, ín Gabriela Pana Dindelegan
(ed.), Aspecte ale dinamicii limbii romane actúale, volumul II, Bucureçti, Editura
Universitafii din Bucureçti, p. 233-256.
Zafíu, Rodica, 2004, „Observafii asupra anaforei ín limba românà actúala”, ín Gabriela
Pana Dindelegan (ed.), Tradifie §i inovafie ín studinl limbii române, Bucureçti,
Editura Universitafii din Bucure§ti, p. 239-252.
Zafiu, Rodica, 2005, „Anafora”, in GAUR (II): 656-672.
Zafiu, Rodica, 2007a, „Anafora discursiva ín textul jumalistic”, ín Ilie Rad (ed.), Stil §i
limbaj in mass-media din Romania, Iaçi, Editura Polirom, p. 321-340.
Zafiu, Rodica, 2007b, „Interpretarea limbajului jumalistic”, Limba românà - Revistó de
çtiinfâ §i culturó (Chiçinâu)9 XVII, nr. 7-9 (145-147), p. 141-146.
Zafiu, Rodica, 2007c, Limbaj §ipoliticó, Bucureçti, Editura Universitapi din Bucureçti.
Zribi-Hertz, Anne, 1992, „De la deixis à l’anaphore: quelques jalons”, in Marry-Annick
Morel, Laurent Danon-Boileau (eds.), La deixis, Paris, Presses Universitaires de
France, p. 603-612.
Zribi-Hertz, Anne, 1996, L’anaphore et les pronoms. Une introduction à la syntaxe
générative, Paris, Presses Universitaires du Septentrion.
Zulaica-Hernandez, Iker, 2009, „On the Cognitive Status of Antecedents in Spanish
Discourse Anaphora”, in Pascual Cantos Gómez, Aquilino Sánchez Pérez (eds.),
Panorama de investigaciones basadas en corpus, Murcia, AELINCO, p. 646-663,
http://www.um.es/lacell/ (data accesárii: 21 ianuarie 2013, ora 16,55).
|
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| author | Gherghina, Mariana-Camelia ca. 20./21. Jh |
| author_GND | (DE-588)1154459462 |
| author_facet | Gherghina, Mariana-Camelia ca. 20./21. Jh |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Gherghina, Mariana-Camelia ca. 20./21. Jh |
| author_variant | m c g mcg |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV044864954 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1028933383 (DE-599)OBVAC14539402 |
| era | Geschichte gnd |
| era_facet | Geschichte |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01916nam a2200409 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV044864954</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20180328 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180313s2017 a||| |||| 00||| rum d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9786061608874</subfield><subfield code="9">978-606-16-0887-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1028933383</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)OBVAC14539402</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">rum</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OST</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gherghina, Mariana-Camelia</subfield><subfield code="d">ca. 20./21. Jh.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1154459462</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Funcţii discursive ale demonstrativelor în limba română actuală</subfield><subfield code="c">Mariana-Camelia Gherghina (Călin)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Bucureşti</subfield><subfield code="b">Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti</subfield><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">179 Seiten, 24 ungezählte Seiten</subfield><subfield code="b">2 Illustrationen, 2 Diagramme</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Colecţia Lingvistică. Lingua</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="648" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Geschichte</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rumänisch</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4115807-6</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Demonstrativpronomen</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4136404-1</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Rumänisch</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4115807-6</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Demonstrativpronomen</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4136404-1</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Geschichte</subfield><subfield code="A">z</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 24 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030259526&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 24 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030259526&sequence=000002&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Literaturverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030259526</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">400</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="g">498</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV044864954 |
| illustrated | Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T08:03:14Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9786061608874 |
| language | Romanian |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030259526 |
| oclc_num | 1028933383 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 |
| physical | 179 Seiten, 24 ungezählte Seiten 2 Illustrationen, 2 Diagramme |
| publishDate | 2017 |
| publishDateSearch | 2017 |
| publishDateSort | 2017 |
| publisher | Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | Colecţia Lingvistică. Lingua |
| spelling | Gherghina, Mariana-Camelia ca. 20./21. Jh. Verfasser (DE-588)1154459462 aut Funcţii discursive ale demonstrativelor în limba română actuală Mariana-Camelia Gherghina (Călin) Bucureşti Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti 2017 179 Seiten, 24 ungezählte Seiten 2 Illustrationen, 2 Diagramme txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Colecţia Lingvistică. Lingua Geschichte gnd rswk-swf Rumänisch (DE-588)4115807-6 gnd rswk-swf Demonstrativpronomen (DE-588)4136404-1 gnd rswk-swf Rumänisch (DE-588)4115807-6 s Demonstrativpronomen (DE-588)4136404-1 s Geschichte z DE-604 Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 24 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030259526&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 24 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030259526&sequence=000002&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Literaturverzeichnis |
| spellingShingle | Gherghina, Mariana-Camelia ca. 20./21. Jh Funcţii discursive ale demonstrativelor în limba română actuală Rumänisch (DE-588)4115807-6 gnd Demonstrativpronomen (DE-588)4136404-1 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4115807-6 (DE-588)4136404-1 |
| title | Funcţii discursive ale demonstrativelor în limba română actuală |
| title_auth | Funcţii discursive ale demonstrativelor în limba română actuală |
| title_exact_search | Funcţii discursive ale demonstrativelor în limba română actuală |
| title_full | Funcţii discursive ale demonstrativelor în limba română actuală Mariana-Camelia Gherghina (Călin) |
| title_fullStr | Funcţii discursive ale demonstrativelor în limba română actuală Mariana-Camelia Gherghina (Călin) |
| title_full_unstemmed | Funcţii discursive ale demonstrativelor în limba română actuală Mariana-Camelia Gherghina (Călin) |
| title_short | Funcţii discursive ale demonstrativelor în limba română actuală |
| title_sort | functii discursive ale demonstrativelor in limba romana actuala |
| topic | Rumänisch (DE-588)4115807-6 gnd Demonstrativpronomen (DE-588)4136404-1 gnd |
| topic_facet | Rumänisch Demonstrativpronomen |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030259526&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030259526&sequence=000002&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT gherghinamarianacamelia functiidiscursivealedemonstrativelorinlimbaromanaactuala |