Forensic fraud: evaluating law enforcement and forensic science cultures in the context of examiner misconduct
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Oxford
Academic Press
© 2013
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Beschreibung: | Forensic Fraud is a timely work that examines the problem of forensic fraud both theoretically and empirically, assessing the relationships among examiner, workplace, evidentiary, and impact variables. Unvalidated or improper forensic science is a leading cause of wrongful convictions. In more than 50% of the DNA exonerations nationwide, unvalidated or improper forensic science contributed to the underlying wrongful conviction. These problems include forensic techniques that have not been subjected to rigorous scientific evaluation (such as hair microscopy, bite mark comparisons, firearm tool mark analysis and shoe print comparisons); testing that is improperly conducted or analysis that is not accurate (regardless of whether the forensic technique involved is validated); and forensic misconduct (such as fabricated test results and misleading testimony). Forensic Fraud is written by a forensic scientist for the forensic science community, rather than by legal scholars or practitioners, as has been the trend. Responds directly to the dramatic increase in forensic fraud related laboratory scandals and closures that have plagued the forensic science communityOffers realistic recommendations and reformsIdeally suited for forensic science professionals, legal practitioners, laboratory supervisors, forensic science students and academicians |
| Beschreibung: | 297 S. |
| ISBN: | 9780124080737 0124080731 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV044793706 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 180223s2013 |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9780124080737 |9 978-0-12-408073-7 | ||
| 020 | |a 0124080731 |9 0-12-408073-1 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1026366347 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV044793706 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-19 | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Turvey, Brent E. |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Forensic fraud |b evaluating law enforcement and forensic science cultures in the context of examiner misconduct |c Brent E. Turvey |
| 264 | 1 | |a Oxford |b Academic Press |c © 2013 | |
| 300 | |a 297 S. | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Forensic Fraud is a timely work that examines the problem of forensic fraud both theoretically and empirically, assessing the relationships among examiner, workplace, evidentiary, and impact variables. Unvalidated or improper forensic science is a leading cause of wrongful convictions. In more than 50% of the DNA exonerations nationwide, unvalidated or improper forensic science contributed to the underlying wrongful conviction. These problems include forensic techniques that have not been subjected to rigorous scientific evaluation (such as hair microscopy, bite mark comparisons, firearm tool mark analysis and shoe print comparisons); testing that is improperly conducted or analysis that is not accurate (regardless of whether the forensic technique involved is validated); and forensic misconduct (such as fabricated test results and misleading testimony). Forensic Fraud is written by a forensic scientist for the forensic science community, rather than by legal scholars or practitioners, as has been the trend. Responds directly to the dramatic increase in forensic fraud related laboratory scandals and closures that have plagued the forensic science communityOffers realistic recommendations and reformsIdeally suited for forensic science professionals, legal practitioners, laboratory supervisors, forensic science students and academicians | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Forensic Sciences | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Fraud | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Criminal investigation |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Fraud investigation |2 fast | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Fraud investigation |z United States | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Criminal investigation | |
| 651 | 4 | |a USA | |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030188848 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804178306995585024 |
|---|---|
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Turvey, Brent E. |
| author_facet | Turvey, Brent E. |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Turvey, Brent E. |
| author_variant | b e t be bet |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV044793706 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1026366347 (DE-599)BVBBV044793706 |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02439nam a2200361zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV044793706</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180223s2013 |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780124080737</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-12-408073-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">0124080731</subfield><subfield code="9">0-12-408073-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1026366347</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV044793706</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Turvey, Brent E.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Forensic fraud</subfield><subfield code="b">evaluating law enforcement and forensic science cultures in the context of examiner misconduct</subfield><subfield code="c">Brent E. Turvey</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Oxford</subfield><subfield code="b">Academic Press</subfield><subfield code="c">© 2013</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">297 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Forensic Fraud is a timely work that examines the problem of forensic fraud both theoretically and empirically, assessing the relationships among examiner, workplace, evidentiary, and impact variables. Unvalidated or improper forensic science is a leading cause of wrongful convictions. In more than 50% of the DNA exonerations nationwide, unvalidated or improper forensic science contributed to the underlying wrongful conviction. These problems include forensic techniques that have not been subjected to rigorous scientific evaluation (such as hair microscopy, bite mark comparisons, firearm tool mark analysis and shoe print comparisons); testing that is improperly conducted or analysis that is not accurate (regardless of whether the forensic technique involved is validated); and forensic misconduct (such as fabricated test results and misleading testimony). Forensic Fraud is written by a forensic scientist for the forensic science community, rather than by legal scholars or practitioners, as has been the trend. Responds directly to the dramatic increase in forensic fraud related laboratory scandals and closures that have plagued the forensic science communityOffers realistic recommendations and reformsIdeally suited for forensic science professionals, legal practitioners, laboratory supervisors, forensic science students and academicians</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Forensic Sciences</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Fraud</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Criminal investigation</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Fraud investigation</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Fraud investigation</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Criminal investigation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030188848</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | USA |
| geographic_facet | USA |
| id | DE-604.BV044793706 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T08:01:53Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9780124080737 0124080731 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030188848 |
| oclc_num | 1026366347 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
| owner_facet | DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
| physical | 297 S. |
| publishDate | 2013 |
| publishDateSearch | 2013 |
| publishDateSort | 2013 |
| publisher | Academic Press |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Turvey, Brent E. Verfasser aut Forensic fraud evaluating law enforcement and forensic science cultures in the context of examiner misconduct Brent E. Turvey Oxford Academic Press © 2013 297 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Forensic Fraud is a timely work that examines the problem of forensic fraud both theoretically and empirically, assessing the relationships among examiner, workplace, evidentiary, and impact variables. Unvalidated or improper forensic science is a leading cause of wrongful convictions. In more than 50% of the DNA exonerations nationwide, unvalidated or improper forensic science contributed to the underlying wrongful conviction. These problems include forensic techniques that have not been subjected to rigorous scientific evaluation (such as hair microscopy, bite mark comparisons, firearm tool mark analysis and shoe print comparisons); testing that is improperly conducted or analysis that is not accurate (regardless of whether the forensic technique involved is validated); and forensic misconduct (such as fabricated test results and misleading testimony). Forensic Fraud is written by a forensic scientist for the forensic science community, rather than by legal scholars or practitioners, as has been the trend. Responds directly to the dramatic increase in forensic fraud related laboratory scandals and closures that have plagued the forensic science communityOffers realistic recommendations and reformsIdeally suited for forensic science professionals, legal practitioners, laboratory supervisors, forensic science students and academicians Forensic Sciences Fraud Criminal investigation fast Fraud investigation fast Fraud investigation United States Criminal investigation USA |
| spellingShingle | Turvey, Brent E. Forensic fraud evaluating law enforcement and forensic science cultures in the context of examiner misconduct Forensic Sciences Fraud Criminal investigation fast Fraud investigation fast Fraud investigation United States Criminal investigation |
| title | Forensic fraud evaluating law enforcement and forensic science cultures in the context of examiner misconduct |
| title_auth | Forensic fraud evaluating law enforcement and forensic science cultures in the context of examiner misconduct |
| title_exact_search | Forensic fraud evaluating law enforcement and forensic science cultures in the context of examiner misconduct |
| title_full | Forensic fraud evaluating law enforcement and forensic science cultures in the context of examiner misconduct Brent E. Turvey |
| title_fullStr | Forensic fraud evaluating law enforcement and forensic science cultures in the context of examiner misconduct Brent E. Turvey |
| title_full_unstemmed | Forensic fraud evaluating law enforcement and forensic science cultures in the context of examiner misconduct Brent E. Turvey |
| title_short | Forensic fraud |
| title_sort | forensic fraud evaluating law enforcement and forensic science cultures in the context of examiner misconduct |
| title_sub | evaluating law enforcement and forensic science cultures in the context of examiner misconduct |
| topic | Forensic Sciences Fraud Criminal investigation fast Fraud investigation fast Fraud investigation United States Criminal investigation |
| topic_facet | Forensic Sciences Fraud Criminal investigation Fraud investigation Fraud investigation United States USA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT turveybrente forensicfraudevaluatinglawenforcementandforensicscienceculturesinthecontextofexaminermisconduct |