Procedure shopping through hybrid arbitration agreements: considerations on party autonomy in institutional international arbitration
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Abschlussarbeit Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Baden-Baden
Nomos
2018
|
| Ausgabe: | 1st edition |
| Schriftenreihe: | Studien zum Internationalen Wirtschaftsrecht / studies on international economic law
Volume 16 |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| Beschreibung: | 572 Seiten |
| ISBN: | 9783848745999 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 cb4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV044754160 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20200525 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 180208s2018 m||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9783848745999 |9 978-3-8487-4599-9 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1024112511 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV044754160 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-M382 |a DE-29 |a DE-703 |a DE-355 |a DE-20 | ||
| 084 | |a PR 2566 |0 (DE-625)139616: |2 rvk | ||
| 084 | |a PT 350 |0 (DE-625)139874: |2 rvk | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Lendermann, Nathalie |0 (DE-588)1153065509 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Procedure shopping through hybrid arbitration agreements |b considerations on party autonomy in institutional international arbitration |c Nathalie Lendermann |
| 250 | |a 1st edition | ||
| 264 | 1 | |a Baden-Baden |b Nomos |c 2018 | |
| 300 | |a 572 Seiten | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 1 | |a Studien zum Internationalen Wirtschaftsrecht / studies on international economic law |v Volume 16 | |
| 502 | |b Dissertation |c Universität Konstanz |d 2017 | ||
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Parteiautonomie |0 (DE-588)4140761-1 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Internationale Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit |0 (DE-588)4162055-0 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Forum Shopping |0 (DE-588)7527901-0 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 655 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)4113937-9 |a Hochschulschrift |2 gnd-content | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Internationale Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit |0 (DE-588)4162055-0 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Forum Shopping |0 (DE-588)7527901-0 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Parteiautonomie |0 (DE-588)4140761-1 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Online-Ausgabe, PDF |z 978-3-8452-8944-1 |
| 810 | 2 | |a studies on international economic law |t Studien zum Internationalen Wirtschaftsrecht |v Volume 16 |w (DE-604)BV036456414 |9 16 | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m SWB Datenaustausch |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030149738&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030149738 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804178269367435264 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | TABLE OF CONTENT
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
21
INTRODUCTION
§ 1 PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION AND DELIMITATION
A. THE CONCEPT OF HYBRID ARBITRATION CLAUSES
B. PROCEDURE SHOPPING - REASONS FOR HYBRID ARBITRATION
CLAUSES
C. THE INSIGMA V, ALSTOM CASE
D. OTHER HYBRID ARBITRATION CASES
E. RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN INSTITUTIONAL ARBITRATION
§2 STATE OF DISCUSSION
§3 STRUCTURE AND RESEARCH APPROACH
29
30
31
32
35
37
39
43
48
CHAPTER 1: PARTY AUTONOMY AND THE LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK 56
§4 PARTY AUTONOMY TO AGREE ON HYBRID ARBITRATION UNDER THE LAW 57
A. IMPORTANCE OF PARTY AUTONOMY IN INTERNATIONAL
ARBITRATION 57
I. AN INTERPLAY OF CONTRACT AND PRIVATE
INTERNATIONAL LAW 58
II. PARTY AUTONOMY IN INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION
CONVENTIONS 59
III. RECOGNITION OF PARTY AUTONOMY BY NATIONAL
ARBITRATION LAWS 60
IV. REASONS FOR THE SUPREMACY OF PARTY AUTONOMY 63
B. LIMITS TO PARTY AUTONOMY AND APPLICABLE LAWS 65
I. LAW OF ARBITRATION: THE SEAT PRINCIPLE 68
1. CHOOSING A PLACE OF ARBITRATION 69
2. PLACE OF ARBITRATION, PLACE OF HEARING, SEAT OF THE
INSTITUTION 71
3. APPLICATION OF ARBITRATION LAWS OF STATES OTHER THAN
THE SEAT? 74
II. LAWS AFFECTING THE ARBITRATION AGREEMENT 75
1. THE SEARCH FOR CONFLICT OF LAWS RULES FOR VALIDITY
ISSUES 77
TABLE OF CONTENT
2. INITIAL CONSIDERATIONS: SUBSTANCE V. PROCEDURE 78
3. LAW OF THE ARBITRATION AGREEMENT BEYOND THE LEX
ARBITRI 81
4. LAW APPLICABLE TO THE OPERABILITY OF THE ARBITRATION
AGREEMENT 83
C. LIMITS TO PARTY AUTONOMY IN ARBITRATION LAWS 86
I. MANDATORY ARBITRATION LAW - AN OVERVIEW 87
II. IN PARTICULAR: MANDATORY ARBITRATION LAW AGAINST HYBRID
ARBITRATION? 90
1. NO GENERAL DUE PROCESS CONCERNS 90
2. THE SKELETAL LEGISLATION ON INSTITUTIONAL ARBITRATION 91
A. STIPULATIONS IN INTERNATIONAL CONVENTIONS 92
B. RARITY OF NATIONAL LEGISLATION ON INSTITUTIONAL
ARBITRATION 97
C. THE QUASI-REGULATIVE FORCE OF INSTITUTIONAL
PRACTICE 104
D. RELEVANT LIMITS TO PARTY AUTONOMY OUTSIDE
ARBITRATION LAWS 106
§5 PRIVATE RULES AND PARTY AUTONOMY 107
A. TYPES OF ARBITRATION RULES 108
B. LEGAL STATUS AND REGIME OF ARBITRATION RULES 110
I. LACKING LEGISLATIVE OR REGULATORY POWER OF ARBITRAL
INSTITUTIONS 112
II. ARBITRATION RULES AS STANDARD TERMS OF THE ARBITRATION
AGREEMENT? 114
III. LAW APPLICABLE TO ARBITRATION RULES 115
C. SOFT LAW AND ARBITRATOR DISCRETION 116
D. INTERPLAY OF INSTITUTIONAL AND ARBITRAL DISCRETION AND PARTY
AUTONOMY 119
§6 HYBRID ARBITRATION FROM A NORMATIVE PERSPECTIVE 122
A. ARBITRAL PROCEDURE AND THE HIERARCHY OF NORMS 122
B, VALIDITY OF HYBRID ARBITRATION AGREEMENTS IN PRINCIPLE 124
CHAPTER 2: QUALIFYING HYBRID ARBITRATION (AGREEMENTS) 126
§7 CATEGORISATION OF HYBRID ARBITRATION AS INSTITUTIONAL 126
A. HYBRID ARBITRATION AS A PROBLEM OF DEFINING INSTITUTIONAL
ARBITRATION 127
I. REJECTION OF DEFINITIONS BASED ON THE CONSTITUTION OF
THE TRIBUNAL 128
II. REJECTION OF DEFINITIONS FOCUSSING ON THE
APPLICABLE RALES 129
10
TABLE OF CONTENT
III. PREFERENCE FOR DEFINITIONS BASED ON INSTITUTIONAL
INVOLVEMENT 129
IV. DEGREE OF INVOLVEMENT OF ARBITRAL INSTITUTIONS 131
B. ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF INSTITUTIONAL
ARBITRATION 134
I. OBJECTIVE ADVANTAGES 135
II. SUBJECTIVE ADVANTAGES 136
III. OBJECTIVE, POSSIBLE AND PERCEIVED DISADVANTAGES 139
L.COST 139
2. BUREAUCRACY 140
3. INTRANSPARENCY AND LACK OF CONTROL 142
IV. SHOPPING FOR ADVANTAGES WITH HYBRID ARBITRATION
AGREEMENTS? 145
C. REALITY OF INTERMEDIATE FORMS OF ARBITRATION 146
I. INSTITUTIONS ACTING AS APPOINTING AUTHORITY 147
II. FACILITATED AD HOC ARBITRATION 147
III. SEMI-INSTITUTIONAL ARBITRATION, E.G. HAMBURG FRIENDLY
ARBITRATION 150
IV. WILDCAT ARBITRATION - AD HOC ARBITRATION UNDER
INSTITUTIONAL RALES 151
1. ARTICLES 1 (2) AND 6 (2) OF THE ICC RULES &
AD HOC CASES 152
2. THE BOVIS LEND V. JAY-TECH CASE 154
V. SWITCHING FROM INSTITUTIONAL TO AD HOC ARBITRATION 156
D. HYBRIDITY OF ARBITRATION ADMINISTERED UNDER ANOTHER
INSTITUTION S RULES 157
§8 QUALIFICATION OF HYBRID ARBITRATION AGREEMENTS AS PATHOLOGICAL 157
A. ESSENTIALIA AND OPTIONAL ELEMENTS OF AN ARBITRATION
AGREEMENT 158
B. THE PRINCIPLE OF EFFECTIVE INTERPRETATION AND ITS LIMITS 161
C. CASE STUDY: PATHOLOGICAL INSTITUTIONAL ARBITRATION
AGREEMENTS 163
I. INITIAL PATHOLOGY: DRAFTING DEFECTS IN THE PARTIES
SPHERE 163
1. AMBIGUOUS REFERENCES TO ONE OR MORE INSTITUTIONS 164
A. BGH JUDGMENT OF 2 DECEMBER 1982 166
B. LOVELOCK V. EXPORTLES - A DECISION OF THE
ENGLISH COURT OF APPEALS 170
C. COUR DE CASSATION, DECISIONS OF
20 FEBRUARY 2007 AND 4 JUNE 2009 172
2. HYBRID ARBITRATION A SOLUTION TO AMBIGUITY? 174
A. THE CASE HKL V. RIZQ 174
11
TABLE OF CONTENT
B. CRITICAL COMMENTS OF THE DECISION 175
3. DISTINCTION BETWEEN DELIBERATELY HYBRID &
AMBIGUOUS CLAUSES 177
A. HCCI COURT AWARD OF 18 APRIL 2000 178
B. THE ICC 500 CASE 181
II. SUBSEQUENT PATHOLOGY: OBSTACLES IN THE INSTITUTION S
SPHERE 184
1. RETROSPECTIVE: DISSOLUTION OFTHEGDR S CHAMBER
OF FOREIGN TRADE 185
A. BGH DECISION OF 20 JANUARY 1994 186
B. EVALUATION AND RELEVANCE FOR MODERN
ARBITRATION LAW 187
2. A CURRENT ISSUE: THE CIETAC SPLIT 190
A. THE BACKGROUND OF THE CREATION OF SHIAC
ANDSCIA 190
B. PROBLEMS WITH OLD SHANGHAI OR SHENZHEN
ARBITRATION CLAUSES 193
C. SOME LOCAL CHINESE JURISPRUDENCE ON THE
CIETAC SPLIT 195
D. THE SPC S 2013 NOTICE ON THE CIETAC SPLIT 198
E. FURTHER GUIDANCE FROM THE SPC:
THE 2015 REPLY 199
F. EVALUATION 200
3. HYBRID ARBITRATION AS A SOLUTION TO SUBSEQUENT
PATHOLOGY? 202
III. ARE HYBRID ARBITRATION CLAUSES INITIALLY OR
SUBSEQUENTLY PATHOLOGICAL? 203
§9 THE QUALIFICATION S CONSEQUENCES: INADVISABILITY AND
POSSIBLE CURE 207
CHAPTER 3: OPTING-OUT ASPECT - DEROGATION FROM INSTITUTIONAL RULES 209
§ 10 INSTITUTIONS FLEXIBILITY IN RELATION TO THEIR RULES 209
A. INSTITUTIONAL ATTITUDES TOWARDS RULE MODIFICATIONS:
A CASE STUDY 210
I. AN EXAMPLE FOR THE ICC S POSITION: THE QIMONDA
ARBITRATION 210
II. SIAC S SEARCH FOR AN ACCEPTABLE POSITION 211
III. CIETAC S APPARENT POSITION 212
IV. THE LCIA S FLEXIBILITY PROVEN IN THE SOFTWOOD
LUMBER ARBITRATIONS 213
12
TABLE OF CONTENT
B,
V. A RECALL OF THE ICC 500 CASE TO INDICATE THE
AAA-ICDR S POSITION
VI. RECALL OF THE DIS/DAS AWARDS
VII. THE APPROACH OF ONE SWISS CANTONAL CHAMBER OF
COMMERCE
A FOCUS ON ESSENTIAL (MANDATORY) INSTITUTIONAL RULES
I. ESSENTIAL ICC RULES
II. ESSENTIAL SIAC RULES
III. ESSENTIAL CIETAC RULES
IV. ESSENTIAL LCIA RULES
1. PARTY AUTONOMY UNDER ARTICLE 14 OF THE LCIA
RULES (1998)
2. REVISIONS INTRODUCED BY THE LCIA RULES (2014)
3. GENERAL RESTRICTIONS TO MODIFY POWERS OF
THE INSTITUTION
V. ESSENTIAL AAA-ICDR RULES
VI. ESSENTIAL DIS RULES
VII. ESSENTIAL SWISS RULES
C. CONTROLLING OR LENIENT: NEGOTIABILITY OF INSTITUTIONAL
SERVICES AND RULES
§ 11 THE INSTITUTION S RIGHT TO REFUSE THE ADMINISTRATION OF A CASE
A. NO DUTY OF THE INSTITUTION TO CONCLUDE A CONTRACT WITH
THE PARTIES
I. NATURE AND CONTENT OF THE ADMINISTRATION CONTRACT
II. LAW APPLICABLE TO THE ADMINISTRATION CONTRACT
1. LAW OF THE SEAT OF THE INSTITUTION
2. LAW APPLICABLE TO THE ARBITRATION AGREEMENT
3. LAW OF THE PLACE OF ARBITRATION
4. OWN VIEW AND DETERMINATION OF THE ADMINISTERING
INSTITUTION S SEAT
III. CONTRACT FORMATION THEORIES
1. THEORY 1 - PARTIES ACCEPT THE INSTITUTION S OFFER AD
INCERTAS PERSONAS
2. THEORY 2 - REQUEST FOR ARBITRATION AS OFFER ACCEPTED
BY THE INSTITUTION
3. THEORY 3 - CONTRACT ONLY CONCLUDED WITH THE
RESPONDENT S ANSWER
IV. CONCLUSIONS FOR REQUESTS FOR ARBITRATION UNDER
DIFFERENT RULES
B. PRACTICE TEST: REFUSAL TO ADMINISTER AS CONTRACT
TERMINATION
215
215
216
218
219
220
222
224
224
225
225
227
228
229
231
232
233
235
236
237
238
239
240
243
244
245
247
247
251
13
TABLE OF CONTENT
I. PROBLEM: TIMING AND COMMUNICATION OF THE
INSTITUTION S REFUSAL 251
II. SOLUTION: FLEXIBLE CONTRACT WITH A BOTH-SIDED
TERMINATION RIGHT 252
1. ARGUMENTS FOR A RIGHT TO TERMINATE THE
ADMINISTRATION CONTRACT 253
2. LIMIT TO THE RIGHT TO TERMINATION 254
3. CONTRACTUAL TERMINATION &JURISDICTIONAL DECISION
OF THE INSTITUTION 255
III. SUPPORT OF THE SOLUTION: HYBRID ARBITRATION AND
THEBATTLEOFFORMS 255
1. THE BATTLE OF INSTITUTIONAL RULES 255
2. SOLUTIONS DISCUSSED FOR BATTLE OF FORMS
PROBLEMS 257
3. APPEASING THE BATTLE OF INSTITUTIONAL RULES 260
IV. THE INSTITUTION S RESTRICTED RIGHT TO DISREGARD RULE
DEROGATIONS 263
C. EFFECT ON THE ARBITRATION AGREEMENT 264
I. OVERVIEW OF THE REPUBLIQUE OF GUINEE CASES 264
1. THE FACTUAL BACKGROUND 264
2. THE DECISIONS OF THE TGI, PARIS 265
3. PARTIAL ANNULMENT OF THE DECISIONS BY THE
CA, PARIS 265
II. EVALUATION OFTHECA S RULING 266
III. FATE OF THE ARBITRATION AGREEMENT; RECONSIDERING THE
TGI S DECISIONS 268
§12 HYBRID ARBITRATION AGREEMENTS AND AUTONOMY OF THE
INSTITUTION 269
CHAPTER 4: OPTING-IN ASPECT - APPLYING ANOTHER INSTITUTION S RULES 2 71
§ 13 THE LEGALITY OF ADMINISTERING HYBRID ARBITRATIONS 272
A. INSTITUTIONAL RULES AND COPYRIGHT OF THE ISSUING INSTITUTION 273
I. COPYRIGHTABILITY OF ARBITRATION RULES 275
1. THE ORIGINALITY/CREATIVITY THRESHOLD 276
2. ARBITRATION RULES AS WORKS IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN? 284
II. HYBRID ARBITRATION AS INFRINGEMENT?
- THE IDEA/EXPRESSION DICHOTOMY 288
1. A PARALLEL: COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT OF GAME RULES
AND SHOW FORMATS? 2 91
2. EXCEPTIONAL PROTECTION OF THE CONTENT AND INTEGRITY
OF A WORK 293
14
TABLE OF CONTENT
3. APPLICATION TO THE USE OF ANOTHER INSTITUTION S
ARBITRATION RULES 295
III. JURISDICTION AND APPLICABLE LAW PROBLEMS:
A HYPOTHETICAL EXAMPLE CASE 297
1. JURISDICTIONAL CONSIDERATIONS 298
2. CONFLICT OF LAWS ANALYSIS 301
B. HYBRID ARBITRATION AND TRADEMARK PROTECTION 304
I. TRADEMARK MENTIONING V.TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT 304
II. DILUTION WITHOUT CONFUSION? 306
III. EXCURSUS: THE CIETAC SPLIT AS A POTENTIAL
TRADEMARK ISSUE 308
C. ADMINISTERING HYBRID ARBITRATIONS AS UNFAIR
COMPETITION? 310
I. THE PROBLEM TO IDENTIFY COMMON PRINCIPLES AMONG
JURISDICTIONS 311
II. APPLICABILITY OF UNFAIR COMPETITION LAW TO ARBITRAL
INSTITUTIONS 313
1. UNFAIR COMPETITION IN THE NON-PROFIT SECTOR 314
2. THE MARKET FOR ADMINISTERING ARBITRAL
PROCEEDINGS 315
3. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN UNFAIR COMPETITION LAW AND
IP LAW 317
III. UNFAIR COMPETITION CONCEPTS POSSIBLY APPLICABLE TO
HYBRID ARBITRATION 321
1. THE CONCEPT OF EXPLOITATION OR
TARNISHMENT OF REPUTATION 322
2. PARASITISME - A CONCEPT OF EXPLOITATION OF
EFFORTS 324
3. COMMON LAW: PASSING OFF AND MISAPPROPRIATION 327
4. A GLANCE AT CHINESE UNFAIR COMPETITION LAW 329
5. THE TORT OF UNDUE INTERFERENCE WITH
CONTRACTUAL RELATIONS 331
IV. JURISDICTION AND APPLICABLE LAW: THREE HYPOTHETICAL
SITUATIONS 333
1. RELEVANCE OF THE MARKET PLACE FOR JURISDICTION? 334
2. QUALIFICATION OF THE REPROACHED CONDUCT AND
LOCALISATION OF THE MARKET 336
D. CONCLUDING REFLECTIONS ON THE ECONOMICS OF EXCLUSIVE
INSTITUTIONAL RULES 340
§ 14 THE FEASIBILITY OF ADMINISTERING HYBRID ARBITRATIONS 344
A. THE TEST: APPLYING SUBSTITUTION THEORY TO A CONFLICT OF
ARBITRATION RULES 344
15
TABLE OF CONTENT
I. A CONTRACT PERSPECTIVE: GENERAL CONTRACT
INTERPRETATION RULES 345
II. A RULE PERSPECTIVE: INTRODUCTION TO SUBSTITUTION AND
ADAPTATION THEORIES 346
III. PARAMETER OF EQUIVALENCE: THE APPLICABLE
RULE S PURPOSE 351
1. THE FUNCTIONAL EQUIVALENCE TEST 352
2. EQUIVALENCE OF ACTORS OR ACTS? 353
IV. ART. 1 (2) OF THE ICC RULES - PER SE AN EXCLUSION OF
SUBSTITUTION? 354
B. RULES REFERRING TO THE ARBITRAL INSTITUTION AND THEIR PURPOSE 355
I. COMMENCEMENT OF THE PROCEEDINGS 357
II. INSTITUTIONAL DECISION ON JURISDICTION 361
1. DISTINCTION: REVIEW OF FILING REQUIREMENTS AND
CONTRACTUAL ACCEPTANCE 362
2. RULES ON INSTITUTIONAL DECISIONS ON JURISDICTION
AND THEIR SCOPE 363
III. CONSTITUTION OF THE ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL 366
1. INSTITUTIONAL DETERMINATION OF THE NUMBER
OF ARBITRATORS 367
2. APPOINTMENT UPON AGREED OR UNOPPOSED
PARTY NOMINATION 368
3. CONFIRMATION OF A CO-ARBITRATOR NOMINATED BY
ONE PARTY ALONE 371
4. INSTITUTIONAL SELECTION OF A CO-ARBITRATOR FOR A
DEFAULTING PARTY 372
5. DEFAULT RULES FOR THE DESIGNATION OF THE
CHAIRPERSON 375
6. INSTITUTIONAL SELECTION OF A SOLE ARBITRATOR OR
CHAIRPERSON 377
IV. CHALLENGE AND REPLACEMENT OF ARBITRATORS 378
V. INSTITUTIONAL CONTROL OF THE PROCEEDINGS AFTER THE
TRIBUNAL IS CONSTITUTED 3 81
VI. INSTITUTIONAL INFLUENCE ON THE AWARD 384
VII. FINANCIAL CONTROL 386
C. GENERAL COMPARISON OF ACTORS OF DIFFERENT ARBITRAL
INSTITUTIONS 388
I. THE SECRETARIATS 388
II. MULTI-PERSON BODIES 391
1. COMPARISON OF THE ICC, LCIA, SIAC AND
SCCAM 392
16
TABLE OF CONTENT
2. THE ARBITRATION COURT(S) UNDER
CIETAC RULES (2015)
3. OTHER, MULTI-PERSON BODIES
III. INDIVIDUALS: PRESIDENT, CHAIRMAN, REGISTRAR,
SECRETARY GENERAL
IV. THE ADMINISTRATOR UNDER AAA-ICDR RULES
D. ADAPTATION OF THE RULES TO THE ADMINISTERING
INSTITUTION S SYSTEM
§15 IMPLEMENTING HYBRID ARBITRATION: AN INSTITUTIONAL
PERSPECTIVE
394
395
397
398
399
400
CHAPTER 5: HYBRID ARBITRATION CLAUSES BEFORE STATE COURTS 402
§ 16 ENFORCING & CHALLENGING HYBRID ARBITRATION AGREEMENTS 402
A. ENFORCEMENT IN RELATION TO THE OTHER PARTY 403
I, OVERVIEW OF POTENTIALLY AVAILABLE ACTIONS 404
1. ACTION FOR DISMISSAL OR STAY OF LITIGATION 404
2. ACTION FOR INTERLOCUTORY DECLARATORY RELIEF 405
3. ACTIONS FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF 407
4. ACTIONS FOR REVIEW OF ARBITRAL DECISIONS ON
JURISDICTION 409
5. ACTIONS FOR STATE COURT SUPPORT 412
II. SELECTED PROBLEMS OF ENFORCING HYBRID ARBITRATION
AGREEMENTS 413
1. ALLOCATION OF COMPETENCE 413
A. NEGATIVE EFFECT OF COMPETENCE-COMPETENCE? 414
B. OVERVIEW OF NATIONAL APPROACHES 415
C. PLEA FOR LIMITED REVIEW OF OPERABILITY ISSUES BY
STATE COURTS 419
D. A CASE FOR COURT SUPPORT 422
2. THE LIMITED SUBJECTIVE RES JUDICATA EFFECT 430
A. INSTITUTIONS NOT CONCERNED BY INTER PARTES EFFECT
OF COURT ORDERS 431
B. THE DECISION HKL V-RIZQ II 433
C. ANTI-ARBITRATION INJUNCTIONS TO SOLVE
INSTITUTIONAL CONFLICTS? 434
3. REVIEW OF AND DEFERENCE TO INSTITUTIONAL
DECISIONS 435
A. MYTH OF THE ADMINISTRATI VE NATURE OF
INSTITUTIONAL ACTS - PART I 435
B. PROVISIONAL NATURE OF THE INSTITUTION S DECISION
ON JURISDICTION? 438
17
TABLE OF CONTENT
C. NO INTERLOCUTORY REVIEW OF INSIIUUIONAL
CONFIRMATION OF JURISDICTION 43
Q
D. INDIRECT: COURT RCVIC V OF INSTITUTIONAL DECLINE
OF JURISDICTION 440
III. STATE COURT POWERS TO ENFORCE (HYBRID) INSTITUTIONAL
ARBITRATION CLAUSES 442
B. ENFORCEMENT IN RELATION TO THE DESIGNATED INSTITUTION 444
I. JUSTICIABILITY - THE MYTH OF THE ADMINISTRNIIVE
NATURE - PART II 444
II. LIABILITY OF ARBITRAL INSTITUTIONS 447
1. EXCURSUS: CONTRACTUAL LIABILITY OF ARBITRATORS 448
A. STATUTORY PROVISIONS LIMITING ARBITRATOR
LIABILITY 448
B. JUDICIAL RULINGS ON ARBITRATOR LIABILITY 44
C
C. ARBITRATION RULES EXCLUDING ARBITRATOR
LIABILITY 451
2. APPLICATION OF THE SAME PRINCIPLES TO ARBITRAL
INSTITUTIONS? 452
3. INSTITUTIONAL LIABILITY RISKS CONNECTED TO HYBRID
ARBITRATION 455
III. AVAILABLE REMEDIES 457
C. THE FORK IN THE ROAD TO ENFORCE HYBRID ARBITRATION
AGREEMENTS 45
C
)
§17 CHALLENGING & ENFORCING HYBRID ARBITRATION AWARDS 461
A. PROBABLE GROUNDS FOR CHALLENGE 463
I. INVALIDITY OF THE ARBITRATION AGREEMENT 463
II. PROCEDURAL IRREGULARITIES 465
III. IRREGULARITY IN THE CONSTITUTION OF THE ARBITRAL
TRIBUNAL 46
L
)
IV. PUBLIC POLICY 470
1. WHAT IS PUBLIC POLICY? 471
2. CAN PRIVATE RULES SHAPE PUBLIC POLICY? 473
3. PUBLIC POLICY TO PROTECT INTERESTS OF THE RULES
ISSUING INSTITUTION? 475
B. PARTY INVOCATION, PRECLUSION AND OUTCOME-RELEVANCE 476
C. THE HANGZHOU INTERMEDIATE PEOPLE S COURT S RULING 480
I. INSIGNIA S OBJECTIONS TO RECOGNITION AND
ENFORCEMENT 480
II. THE HANGZHOU COURT S FACTUAL FINDINGS ON THE
ARBITRATION PROCEDURE 482
1. THE INITIAL COMMENCEMENT OF ICC ARBITRATION 482
18
TABLE OF CONTENT
2. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE TRANSFERAL TO
S1AC 482
3. THE CONSTITUTION OF THE ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL 483
4. THE HEARING ON JURISDICTION AND THE SINGAPORE
COURTS DECISIONS 484
5. THE HEARING ON THE MERITS AND THE AWARDS 484
III. THE RATIO OF THE HANGZHOU COURT S DECISION 485
IV. EVALUATION 485
§ 18 ENFORCEMENT RISKS OF HYBRID ARBITRATION AGREEMENTS 487
CONCLUSION 489
§ 19 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 489
§20 LOOKING BACK FOR A WAY FORWARD: A PLEA FOR INSTITUTIONAL
COOPERATION 495
§21 RECALL OF KEY PROPOSITIONS 497
DEUTSCHSPRACHIGE ZUSAMMENFASSIING (SUMMARY IN GENNAN)
§22 THEMENEINFUHRUNG
§23 ERGEBNISSE
§24 THESEN DER ARBEIT
500
500
503
511
BIBLIOGRAPHY 515
PRIMARY SOURCES 559
TREATIES / CONVENTIONS & MULTILATERAL DECLARATIONS 559
EU LEGISLATION (REGULATIONS & DIRECTIVES) 560
NATIONAL LEGISLATION, REGULATIONS AND INSTMMENTS ISSUED BY
STATE ORGANS 561
UNITED NATIONS MODEL LAWS, PRINCIPLES AND REPORTS 566
ARBITRATION RULES & GUIDELINES 567
19
|
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| author | Lendermann, Nathalie |
| author_GND | (DE-588)1153065509 |
| author_facet | Lendermann, Nathalie |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Lendermann, Nathalie |
| author_variant | n l nl |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV044754160 |
| classification_rvk | PR 2566 PT 350 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1024112511 (DE-599)BVBBV044754160 |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| edition | 1st edition |
| format | Thesis Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02074nam a2200445 cb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV044754160</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20200525 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180208s2018 m||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9783848745999</subfield><subfield code="9">978-3-8487-4599-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1024112511</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV044754160</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-M382</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-29</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-703</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-355</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PR 2566</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)139616:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PT 350</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)139874:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lendermann, Nathalie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1153065509</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Procedure shopping through hybrid arbitration agreements</subfield><subfield code="b">considerations on party autonomy in institutional international arbitration</subfield><subfield code="c">Nathalie Lendermann</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1st edition</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Baden-Baden</subfield><subfield code="b">Nomos</subfield><subfield code="c">2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">572 Seiten</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Studien zum Internationalen Wirtschaftsrecht / studies on international economic law</subfield><subfield code="v">Volume 16</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="502" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">Dissertation</subfield><subfield code="c">Universität Konstanz</subfield><subfield code="d">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Parteiautonomie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4140761-1</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Internationale Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4162055-0</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Forum Shopping</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)7527901-0</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4113937-9</subfield><subfield code="a">Hochschulschrift</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd-content</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Internationale Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4162055-0</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Forum Shopping</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)7527901-0</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Parteiautonomie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4140761-1</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Online-Ausgabe, PDF</subfield><subfield code="z">978-3-8452-8944-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="810" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">studies on international economic law</subfield><subfield code="t">Studien zum Internationalen Wirtschaftsrecht</subfield><subfield code="v">Volume 16</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV036456414</subfield><subfield code="9">16</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">SWB Datenaustausch</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030149738&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030149738</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| genre | (DE-588)4113937-9 Hochschulschrift gnd-content |
| genre_facet | Hochschulschrift |
| id | DE-604.BV044754160 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T08:01:17Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9783848745999 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030149738 |
| oclc_num | 1024112511 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-M382 DE-29 DE-703 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-20 |
| owner_facet | DE-M382 DE-29 DE-703 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-20 |
| physical | 572 Seiten |
| publishDate | 2018 |
| publishDateSearch | 2018 |
| publishDateSort | 2018 |
| publisher | Nomos |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | Studien zum Internationalen Wirtschaftsrecht / studies on international economic law |
| spelling | Lendermann, Nathalie (DE-588)1153065509 aut Procedure shopping through hybrid arbitration agreements considerations on party autonomy in institutional international arbitration Nathalie Lendermann 1st edition Baden-Baden Nomos 2018 572 Seiten txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Studien zum Internationalen Wirtschaftsrecht / studies on international economic law Volume 16 Dissertation Universität Konstanz 2017 Parteiautonomie (DE-588)4140761-1 gnd rswk-swf Internationale Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit (DE-588)4162055-0 gnd rswk-swf Forum Shopping (DE-588)7527901-0 gnd rswk-swf (DE-588)4113937-9 Hochschulschrift gnd-content Internationale Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit (DE-588)4162055-0 s Forum Shopping (DE-588)7527901-0 s Parteiautonomie (DE-588)4140761-1 s DE-604 Erscheint auch als Online-Ausgabe, PDF 978-3-8452-8944-1 studies on international economic law Studien zum Internationalen Wirtschaftsrecht Volume 16 (DE-604)BV036456414 16 SWB Datenaustausch application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030149738&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| spellingShingle | Lendermann, Nathalie Procedure shopping through hybrid arbitration agreements considerations on party autonomy in institutional international arbitration Parteiautonomie (DE-588)4140761-1 gnd Internationale Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit (DE-588)4162055-0 gnd Forum Shopping (DE-588)7527901-0 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4140761-1 (DE-588)4162055-0 (DE-588)7527901-0 (DE-588)4113937-9 |
| title | Procedure shopping through hybrid arbitration agreements considerations on party autonomy in institutional international arbitration |
| title_auth | Procedure shopping through hybrid arbitration agreements considerations on party autonomy in institutional international arbitration |
| title_exact_search | Procedure shopping through hybrid arbitration agreements considerations on party autonomy in institutional international arbitration |
| title_full | Procedure shopping through hybrid arbitration agreements considerations on party autonomy in institutional international arbitration Nathalie Lendermann |
| title_fullStr | Procedure shopping through hybrid arbitration agreements considerations on party autonomy in institutional international arbitration Nathalie Lendermann |
| title_full_unstemmed | Procedure shopping through hybrid arbitration agreements considerations on party autonomy in institutional international arbitration Nathalie Lendermann |
| title_short | Procedure shopping through hybrid arbitration agreements |
| title_sort | procedure shopping through hybrid arbitration agreements considerations on party autonomy in institutional international arbitration |
| title_sub | considerations on party autonomy in institutional international arbitration |
| topic | Parteiautonomie (DE-588)4140761-1 gnd Internationale Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit (DE-588)4162055-0 gnd Forum Shopping (DE-588)7527901-0 gnd |
| topic_facet | Parteiautonomie Internationale Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit Forum Shopping Hochschulschrift |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030149738&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| volume_link | (DE-604)BV036456414 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT lendermannnathalie procedureshoppingthroughhybridarbitrationagreementsconsiderationsonpartyautonomyininstitutionalinternationalarbitration |