People and planning: report of the Committee on Public Participation in Planning (the Skeffington Committee Report)
"The Skeffington Committee was appointed in 1968 to look at ways of involving the wider public in the formative stages of local development plans. It was the first concerted effort to encourage a systematic approach to resident participation in planning and the decision-making process, in contr...
Gespeichert in:
| Körperschaft: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
London ; New York
Routledge
2014
|
| Schriftenreihe: | Studies in international planning history
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| Zusammenfassung: | "The Skeffington Committee was appointed in 1968 to look at ways of involving the wider public in the formative stages of local development plans. It was the first concerted effort to encourage a systematic approach to resident participation in planning and the decision-making process, in contrast to the entirely top down process created by the 1947 Town and Country Planning Act. The origins of the Skeffington Report lay in the 1965 publication by the Planning Advisory Group of The Future of Development Plans, which recommended changes to the planning system to include much greater public participation. It called for all plans to be publicly debated in full, with the opportunity for representations to be made throughout the entire preparation process. There was also a growing realisation of the impact of the American planning experience and a growth of interest in the concept of participatory democracy as opposed to representative democracy. However, the immediate impact of the Skeffington Committee was limited. It was criticised as being too ambiguous and as encouraging nothing more than greater publicity and as 'educating' residents from the planners perspective. 'Participation' was inadequately defined and the Report was seen to simply promote a more efficient system by convincing people of the virtues of planning. Local authorities used and undermined the idea of participation to simply speed up the planning process by giving their decisions a seal of legitimacy. Technocrats and local authorities simply subverted the ambiguities of the Report for their own purposes.Yet this is to underestimate the long term impact of the underlying principles first expressed in the Skeffington Report. It has been a long and tortuous process and in many respects it remains a difficult ideal to implement in an entirely satisfactory and systematic way. Nevertheless, the concept of participation established by the Report has continued to be a central consideration in planning. "-- |
| Beschreibung: | xxi, 70 pages Illustrationen, Karten 26 cm |
| ISBN: | 9780415827874 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV044721643 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20180216 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 180119s2014 a||| |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9780415827874 |c USD 155.00 |9 978-0-415-82787-4 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)931071789 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)GBV739884700 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-473 | ||
| 084 | |a LO 61324 |0 (DE-625)103836:158 |2 rvk | ||
| 084 | |a ZH 9030 |0 (DE-625)156294:1581 |2 rvk | ||
| 084 | |a 74.72 |2 bkl | ||
| 084 | |a 89.57 |2 bkl | ||
| 110 | 2 | |a Großbritannien |b Committee on Public Participation in Planning |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)807070-2 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a People and planning |b report of the Committee on Public Participation in Planning (the Skeffington Committee Report) |c introduction by Peter Shapely |
| 264 | 1 | |a London ; New York |b Routledge |c 2014 | |
| 300 | |a xxi, 70 pages |b Illustrationen, Karten |c 26 cm | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a Studies in international planning history | |
| 520 | 3 | |a "The Skeffington Committee was appointed in 1968 to look at ways of involving the wider public in the formative stages of local development plans. It was the first concerted effort to encourage a systematic approach to resident participation in planning and the decision-making process, in contrast to the entirely top down process created by the 1947 Town and Country Planning Act. The origins of the Skeffington Report lay in the 1965 publication by the Planning Advisory Group of The Future of Development Plans, which recommended changes to the planning system to include much greater public participation. It called for all plans to be publicly debated in full, with the opportunity for representations to be made throughout the entire preparation process. There was also a growing realisation of the impact of the American planning experience and a growth of interest in the concept of participatory democracy as opposed to representative democracy. | |
| 520 | 3 | |a However, the immediate impact of the Skeffington Committee was limited. It was criticised as being too ambiguous and as encouraging nothing more than greater publicity and as 'educating' residents from the planners perspective. 'Participation' was inadequately defined and the Report was seen to simply promote a more efficient system by convincing people of the virtues of planning. Local authorities used and undermined the idea of participation to simply speed up the planning process by giving their decisions a seal of legitimacy. Technocrats and local authorities simply subverted the ambiguities of the Report for their own purposes.Yet this is to underestimate the long term impact of the underlying principles first expressed in the Skeffington Report. It has been a long and tortuous process and in many respects it remains a difficult ideal to implement in an entirely satisfactory and systematic way. | |
| 520 | 3 | |a Nevertheless, the concept of participation established by the Report has continued to be a central consideration in planning. "-- | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Stadtplanung |0 (DE-588)4056754-0 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Bürgerbeteiligung |0 (DE-588)4008767-0 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 7 | |a Großbritannien |0 (DE-588)4022153-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Stadtplanung |0 (DE-588)4056754-0 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Bürgerbeteiligung |0 (DE-588)4008767-0 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Großbritannien |0 (DE-588)4022153-2 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Shapely, Peter |0 (DE-588)1140171968 |4 win | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Online-Ausgabe |z 978-0-203-79496-8 |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m V:DE-601;B:DE-89 |q pdf/application |u http://www.gbv.de/dms/tib-ub-hannover/739884700.pdf |y Inhaltsverzeichnis |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030117911 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804178210802368513 |
|---|---|
| any_adam_object | |
| author_GND | (DE-588)1140171968 |
| author_corporate | Großbritannien Committee on Public Participation in Planning |
| author_corporate_role | aut |
| author_facet | Großbritannien Committee on Public Participation in Planning |
| author_sort | Großbritannien Committee on Public Participation in Planning |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV044721643 |
| classification_rvk | LO 61324 ZH 9030 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)931071789 (DE-599)GBV739884700 |
| discipline | Kunstgeschichte Architektur |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03818nam a2200469 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV044721643</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20180216 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180119s2014 a||| |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780415827874</subfield><subfield code="c">USD 155.00</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-415-82787-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)931071789</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBV739884700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">LO 61324</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)103836:158</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZH 9030</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)156294:1581</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">74.72</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">89.57</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="110" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Großbritannien</subfield><subfield code="b">Committee on Public Participation in Planning</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)807070-2</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">People and planning</subfield><subfield code="b">report of the Committee on Public Participation in Planning (the Skeffington Committee Report)</subfield><subfield code="c">introduction by Peter Shapely</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">London ; New York</subfield><subfield code="b">Routledge</subfield><subfield code="c">2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xxi, 70 pages</subfield><subfield code="b">Illustrationen, Karten</subfield><subfield code="c">26 cm</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Studies in international planning history</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"The Skeffington Committee was appointed in 1968 to look at ways of involving the wider public in the formative stages of local development plans. It was the first concerted effort to encourage a systematic approach to resident participation in planning and the decision-making process, in contrast to the entirely top down process created by the 1947 Town and Country Planning Act. The origins of the Skeffington Report lay in the 1965 publication by the Planning Advisory Group of The Future of Development Plans, which recommended changes to the planning system to include much greater public participation. It called for all plans to be publicly debated in full, with the opportunity for representations to be made throughout the entire preparation process. There was also a growing realisation of the impact of the American planning experience and a growth of interest in the concept of participatory democracy as opposed to representative democracy. </subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a"> However, the immediate impact of the Skeffington Committee was limited. It was criticised as being too ambiguous and as encouraging nothing more than greater publicity and as 'educating' residents from the planners perspective. 'Participation' was inadequately defined and the Report was seen to simply promote a more efficient system by convincing people of the virtues of planning. Local authorities used and undermined the idea of participation to simply speed up the planning process by giving their decisions a seal of legitimacy. Technocrats and local authorities simply subverted the ambiguities of the Report for their own purposes.Yet this is to underestimate the long term impact of the underlying principles first expressed in the Skeffington Report. It has been a long and tortuous process and in many respects it remains a difficult ideal to implement in an entirely satisfactory and systematic way. </subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nevertheless, the concept of participation established by the Report has continued to be a central consideration in planning. "--</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Stadtplanung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4056754-0</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Bürgerbeteiligung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4008767-0</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Großbritannien</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4022153-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Stadtplanung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4056754-0</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Bürgerbeteiligung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4008767-0</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Großbritannien</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4022153-2</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Shapely, Peter</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1140171968</subfield><subfield code="4">win</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Online-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">978-0-203-79496-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">V:DE-601;B:DE-89</subfield><subfield code="q">pdf/application</subfield><subfield code="u">http://www.gbv.de/dms/tib-ub-hannover/739884700.pdf</subfield><subfield code="y">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030117911</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | Großbritannien (DE-588)4022153-2 gnd |
| geographic_facet | Großbritannien |
| id | DE-604.BV044721643 |
| illustrated | Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T08:00:21Z |
| institution | BVB |
| institution_GND | (DE-588)807070-2 |
| isbn | 9780415827874 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030117911 |
| oclc_num | 931071789 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-473 DE-BY-UBG |
| owner_facet | DE-473 DE-BY-UBG |
| physical | xxi, 70 pages Illustrationen, Karten 26 cm |
| publishDate | 2014 |
| publishDateSearch | 2014 |
| publishDateSort | 2014 |
| publisher | Routledge |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | Studies in international planning history |
| spelling | Großbritannien Committee on Public Participation in Planning Verfasser (DE-588)807070-2 aut People and planning report of the Committee on Public Participation in Planning (the Skeffington Committee Report) introduction by Peter Shapely London ; New York Routledge 2014 xxi, 70 pages Illustrationen, Karten 26 cm txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Studies in international planning history "The Skeffington Committee was appointed in 1968 to look at ways of involving the wider public in the formative stages of local development plans. It was the first concerted effort to encourage a systematic approach to resident participation in planning and the decision-making process, in contrast to the entirely top down process created by the 1947 Town and Country Planning Act. The origins of the Skeffington Report lay in the 1965 publication by the Planning Advisory Group of The Future of Development Plans, which recommended changes to the planning system to include much greater public participation. It called for all plans to be publicly debated in full, with the opportunity for representations to be made throughout the entire preparation process. There was also a growing realisation of the impact of the American planning experience and a growth of interest in the concept of participatory democracy as opposed to representative democracy. However, the immediate impact of the Skeffington Committee was limited. It was criticised as being too ambiguous and as encouraging nothing more than greater publicity and as 'educating' residents from the planners perspective. 'Participation' was inadequately defined and the Report was seen to simply promote a more efficient system by convincing people of the virtues of planning. Local authorities used and undermined the idea of participation to simply speed up the planning process by giving their decisions a seal of legitimacy. Technocrats and local authorities simply subverted the ambiguities of the Report for their own purposes.Yet this is to underestimate the long term impact of the underlying principles first expressed in the Skeffington Report. It has been a long and tortuous process and in many respects it remains a difficult ideal to implement in an entirely satisfactory and systematic way. Nevertheless, the concept of participation established by the Report has continued to be a central consideration in planning. "-- Stadtplanung (DE-588)4056754-0 gnd rswk-swf Bürgerbeteiligung (DE-588)4008767-0 gnd rswk-swf Großbritannien (DE-588)4022153-2 gnd rswk-swf Stadtplanung (DE-588)4056754-0 s Bürgerbeteiligung (DE-588)4008767-0 s Großbritannien (DE-588)4022153-2 g DE-604 Shapely, Peter (DE-588)1140171968 win Erscheint auch als Online-Ausgabe 978-0-203-79496-8 V:DE-601;B:DE-89 pdf/application http://www.gbv.de/dms/tib-ub-hannover/739884700.pdf Inhaltsverzeichnis Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| spellingShingle | People and planning report of the Committee on Public Participation in Planning (the Skeffington Committee Report) Stadtplanung (DE-588)4056754-0 gnd Bürgerbeteiligung (DE-588)4008767-0 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4056754-0 (DE-588)4008767-0 (DE-588)4022153-2 |
| title | People and planning report of the Committee on Public Participation in Planning (the Skeffington Committee Report) |
| title_auth | People and planning report of the Committee on Public Participation in Planning (the Skeffington Committee Report) |
| title_exact_search | People and planning report of the Committee on Public Participation in Planning (the Skeffington Committee Report) |
| title_full | People and planning report of the Committee on Public Participation in Planning (the Skeffington Committee Report) introduction by Peter Shapely |
| title_fullStr | People and planning report of the Committee on Public Participation in Planning (the Skeffington Committee Report) introduction by Peter Shapely |
| title_full_unstemmed | People and planning report of the Committee on Public Participation in Planning (the Skeffington Committee Report) introduction by Peter Shapely |
| title_short | People and planning |
| title_sort | people and planning report of the committee on public participation in planning the skeffington committee report |
| title_sub | report of the Committee on Public Participation in Planning (the Skeffington Committee Report) |
| topic | Stadtplanung (DE-588)4056754-0 gnd Bürgerbeteiligung (DE-588)4008767-0 gnd |
| topic_facet | Stadtplanung Bürgerbeteiligung Großbritannien |
| url | http://www.gbv.de/dms/tib-ub-hannover/739884700.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT großbritanniencommitteeonpublicparticipationinplanning peopleandplanningreportofthecommitteeonpublicparticipationinplanningtheskeffingtoncommitteereport AT shapelypeter peopleandplanningreportofthecommitteeonpublicparticipationinplanningtheskeffingtoncommitteereport |