Architectural Symbolism: Body and Space in Heinrich Wölfflin and Wilhelm Worringer

The paper questions Jacques Rançière’s conception of the modern aesthetic regime as the correlation between visuality and language by returning to two fundamental figures of modern art history, Heinrich Wölfflin and Wilhelm Worringer. First, Wölfflin’s "Prolegomena" (1886) is interpreted a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. Verfasser: Ionescu, Vlad (VerfasserIn)
Format: Elektronisch Artikel
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 30 Jun 2016
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Zusammenfassung:The paper questions Jacques Rançière’s conception of the modern aesthetic regime as the correlation between visuality and language by returning to two fundamental figures of modern art history, Heinrich Wölfflin and Wilhelm Worringer. First, Wölfflin’s "Prolegomena" (1886) is interpreted as an attempt to conceive architectural space in terms of affectivity. Second, this conception of space is related to the Th. Vischer’s and J. Volkelt’s theory of symbolism. Third, the paper integrates this aesthetics in a model that conceives form as force (Goethe). Fourth, this modulation of affectivity that justifies architectural space is confronted with Wilhelm Worringer’s concept of abstraction. After all, this notion responds also to a conception of art in terms of space and affectivity. Finally, the paper debates the role of Wölfflin’s "Prolegomena" from the perspective of architectural design and its relation to modernity.
Beschreibung:Illustrationen
ISSN:2050-5833
DOI:10.5334/ah.213

Es ist kein Print-Exemplar vorhanden.

Fernleihe Bestellen Achtung: Nicht im THWS-Bestand! Volltext öffnen