Proportion and Building Material, or Theory versus Practice in the Determination of the Module:
Architectural theorists have advocated the use of a module in the design process since the time of Vitruvius, but the responsibility for the creation of the module has remained largely unclear. The module has always been described as related or equal to the column shaft diameter. Since antiquity col...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Elektronisch Artikel |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
18 May 2015
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Zusammenfassung: | Architectural theorists have advocated the use of a module in the design process since the time of Vitruvius, but the responsibility for the creation of the module has remained largely unclear. The module has always been described as related or equal to the column shaft diameter. Since antiquity columns, for example, were mostly delivered in standard measures; the architect in charge was very limited in his selection of a module. In the 15th and 16th centuries, only gradually did theoreticians understand that here theory and practice were not in line. Things began to change with Vignola, who described a method for how to calculate the proper module for each individual design and building project. |
Beschreibung: | Illustrationen |
ISSN: | 2050-5833 |
DOI: | 10.5334/ah.cm |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nma a2200000 c 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV044657118 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 171129s2015 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.5334/ah.cm |2 doi | |
035 | |a (OCoLC)1013593743 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV044657118 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-Y3 |a DE-255 |a DE-Y7 |a DE-Y2 | ||
100 | 1 | |a Bosman, Lex |d 1956- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)188466673 |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Proportion and Building Material, or Theory versus Practice in the Determination of the Module |c Lex Bosman |
264 | 1 | |c 18 May 2015 | |
300 | |b Illustrationen | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Architectural theorists have advocated the use of a module in the design process since the time of Vitruvius, but the responsibility for the creation of the module has remained largely unclear. The module has always been described as related or equal to the column shaft diameter. Since antiquity columns, for example, were mostly delivered in standard measures; the architect in charge was very limited in his selection of a module. In the 15th and 16th centuries, only gradually did theoreticians understand that here theory and practice were not in line. Things began to change with Vignola, who described a method for how to calculate the proper module for each individual design and building project. | ||
650 | 4 | |a module, proportion and design, theory of architecture, Vitruvius, Vignola | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |t Architectural histories / European Architectural History Network, EAHN |d London, 2015 |g Volume 3, Issue 1 (2015) |w (DE-604)BV041185030 |x 2050-5833 |o (DE-600)2726365-4 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |q text/html |u http://doi.org/10.5334/ah.cm |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030054715 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804178090874634240 |
---|---|
any_adam_object | |
article_link | (DE-604)BV041185030 |
author | Bosman, Lex 1956- |
author_GND | (DE-588)188466673 |
author_facet | Bosman, Lex 1956- |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Bosman, Lex 1956- |
author_variant | l b lb |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV044657118 |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1013593743 (DE-599)BVBBV044657118 |
doi_str_mv | 10.5334/ah.cm |
format | Electronic Article |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01855nma a2200301 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV044657118</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">171129s2015 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.5334/ah.cm</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1013593743</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV044657118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-Y3</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-255</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-Y7</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-Y2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bosman, Lex</subfield><subfield code="d">1956-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)188466673</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Proportion and Building Material, or Theory versus Practice in the Determination of the Module</subfield><subfield code="c">Lex Bosman</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">18 May 2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">Illustrationen</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Architectural theorists have advocated the use of a module in the design process since the time of Vitruvius, but the responsibility for the creation of the module has remained largely unclear. The module has always been described as related or equal to the column shaft diameter. Since antiquity columns, for example, were mostly delivered in standard measures; the architect in charge was very limited in his selection of a module. In the 15th and 16th centuries, only gradually did theoreticians understand that here theory and practice were not in line. Things began to change with Vignola, who described a method for how to calculate the proper module for each individual design and building project.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">module, proportion and design, theory of architecture, Vitruvius, Vignola</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="t">Architectural histories / European Architectural History Network, EAHN</subfield><subfield code="d">London, 2015</subfield><subfield code="g">Volume 3, Issue 1 (2015)</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV041185030</subfield><subfield code="x">2050-5833</subfield><subfield code="o">(DE-600)2726365-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="q">text/html</subfield><subfield code="u">http://doi.org/10.5334/ah.cm</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030054715</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV044657118 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-07-10T07:58:27Z |
institution | BVB |
issn | 2050-5833 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030054715 |
oclc_num | 1013593743 |
open_access_boolean | 1 |
owner | DE-Y3 DE-255 DE-Y7 DE-Y2 |
owner_facet | DE-Y3 DE-255 DE-Y7 DE-Y2 |
physical | Illustrationen |
publishDate | 2015 |
publishDateSearch | 2015 |
publishDateSort | 2015 |
record_format | marc |
spelling | Bosman, Lex 1956- Verfasser (DE-588)188466673 aut Proportion and Building Material, or Theory versus Practice in the Determination of the Module Lex Bosman 18 May 2015 Illustrationen txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Architectural theorists have advocated the use of a module in the design process since the time of Vitruvius, but the responsibility for the creation of the module has remained largely unclear. The module has always been described as related or equal to the column shaft diameter. Since antiquity columns, for example, were mostly delivered in standard measures; the architect in charge was very limited in his selection of a module. In the 15th and 16th centuries, only gradually did theoreticians understand that here theory and practice were not in line. Things began to change with Vignola, who described a method for how to calculate the proper module for each individual design and building project. module, proportion and design, theory of architecture, Vitruvius, Vignola Architectural histories / European Architectural History Network, EAHN London, 2015 Volume 3, Issue 1 (2015) (DE-604)BV041185030 2050-5833 (DE-600)2726365-4 text/html http://doi.org/10.5334/ah.cm Verlag kostenfrei Volltext |
spellingShingle | Bosman, Lex 1956- Proportion and Building Material, or Theory versus Practice in the Determination of the Module module, proportion and design, theory of architecture, Vitruvius, Vignola |
title | Proportion and Building Material, or Theory versus Practice in the Determination of the Module |
title_auth | Proportion and Building Material, or Theory versus Practice in the Determination of the Module |
title_exact_search | Proportion and Building Material, or Theory versus Practice in the Determination of the Module |
title_full | Proportion and Building Material, or Theory versus Practice in the Determination of the Module Lex Bosman |
title_fullStr | Proportion and Building Material, or Theory versus Practice in the Determination of the Module Lex Bosman |
title_full_unstemmed | Proportion and Building Material, or Theory versus Practice in the Determination of the Module Lex Bosman |
title_short | Proportion and Building Material, or Theory versus Practice in the Determination of the Module |
title_sort | proportion and building material or theory versus practice in the determination of the module |
topic | module, proportion and design, theory of architecture, Vitruvius, Vignola |
topic_facet | module, proportion and design, theory of architecture, Vitruvius, Vignola |
url | http://doi.org/10.5334/ah.cm |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bosmanlex proportionandbuildingmaterialortheoryversuspracticeinthedeterminationofthemodule |