Codification of administrative procedure:
Gespeichert in:
| Weitere Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Schriftenreihe: | Collection administrative law
13 |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis Klappentext |
| Beschreibung: | VII, 431 Seiten |
| ISBN: | 9782802743477 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 cb4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV044648907 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20180515 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 171123s2014 |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9782802743477 |9 978-2-8027-4347-7 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)985114763 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ402305841 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-703 | ||
| 084 | |a PN 980 |0 (DE-625)137857: |2 rvk | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Codification of administrative procedure |c edited by Jean-Bernard Auby |
| 264 | 0 | |a Bruxelles |b Bruylant |c [2014] | |
| 300 | |a VII, 431 Seiten | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 1 | |a Collection administrative law |v 13 | |
| 490 | 0 | |a European law | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Kodifikation |0 (DE-588)4031459-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Rechtsvergleich |0 (DE-588)4115712-6 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Verwaltungsverfahren |0 (DE-588)4063359-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Verwaltungsverfahren |0 (DE-588)4063359-7 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Kodifikation |0 (DE-588)4031459-5 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Rechtsvergleich |0 (DE-588)4115712-6 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Auby, Jean-Bernard |0 (DE-588)143199609 |4 edt | |
| 830 | 0 | |a Collection administrative law |v 13 |w (DE-604)BV023234036 |9 13 | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung UB Bayreuth - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030046678&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung UB Bayreuth - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030046678&sequence=000002&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Klappentext |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030046678 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804178075688108032 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | TABLE OF CONTENTS
A
Foreword.............................................................v
George A. Bbrmann...................................................v
General Report.......................................................1
Jean-Bernard Auby...................................................1
1. Framing the Issue...............................................2
1.1. Administrative procedure?.................................2
1.2. Codification or not?......................................3
2. The Making of GAPAs.............................................4
3. The Content of GAPAs: General Orientations......................5
3.1. Scope.....................................................5
3.1.1. In terms of bodies regulated..........................5
3.1.2. In terms of fields of administration covered..........7
3.1.3. As to the kinds of administrative acts included.......8
3.1.4. As to issues regulated................................9
3.1.5. Organisational issues................................10
3.1.6. Conflicts of interest................................11
3.1.7. Freedom of information...............................11
3.1.8. Administrative liability.............................11
3.2. Combination with other sources.......................... 11
3.3. Concepts and principles..................................13
3.3.1. GAPAs are more or less centred on the administrative act. . 13
3.3.2. GAPAs approach is more or less judicial-like.........14
3.3.3. Differences related to principles put forward in the GAPAs... 14
3.3.4. One procedural pattern or several?...................15
3.3.5. Room for participation of lay citizens...............16
4. The Content of GAPAs: concrete arrangements....................17
4.1. Proceedings..............................................17
4.1.1. Jurisdictional issues................................17
4.1.2. Starting up of the procedure.........................18
4.1.3. Parties..............................................18
4.1.4. Evidence.............................................20
4.1.5. Other issues.........................................20
BRUYLANT
420
CODIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE
4.2. Outcome......................................................21
4.2.1. Kinds of possible outcomes..............................21
4.2.2. Obligation to issue an outcome and consequences of inertia.. 22
4.2.3. Consequences of procedural irregularities
on the outcome of procedures.................................23
4.2.4. Appeals.................................................24
4.2.5. Modification and revocation of decisions................25
5. The Evolution of GAPAs.............................................26
6. Living without a GAPA..............................................27
National Reports........................................................29
Chapter 1. Australia
Iain Stewart...........................................................31
1. Codification: mors codicisï........................................32
1.1. Code and codification........................................32
1.2. The Code Napoléon: from book to database....................35
1.3. Is codification still possible? From scrolls to scrolling...37
1.3.1. Life of the Code civil..................................37
1.3.2. Too much codification? .................................38
1.3.3. The French codes today..................................39
1.3.4. Codes, from books to databases.........................41
1.4. Justinian: comprehensiveness and exclusivity.................41
1.5. Style, logic and audience....................................44
1.5.1. Style and logic — Portalis..............................44
1.5.2. Audiences...............................................47
1.5.3. Legal databases.........................................48
1.6. Access to and access in (searchability)......................49
2. Australia..........................................................51
2.1. Introduction.................................................51
2.2. Law online...................................................53
2.3. Constitutive and supervisory administrative law..............53
2.4. Constitutive law of administrative procedure.................55
2.5. Supervisory law of administrative procedure..................55
2.5.1. Division of powers......................................55
2.5.2. Courts and tribunals....................................56
2.5.3. Binding decisions.......................................56
2.5.4. “Review”................................................57
BRUYLANT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
421
2.5.5. Grounds of review...................................... 58
2.5.6. Exclusion of review....................................59
2.5.7. Formality and informality.............................. 60
2.5.8. Remedies...............................................60
2.6. The new administrative law................................61
2.6.1. The new legislation....................................61
2.6.2. Fates of the new legislation...........................63
2.6.3. Prescribed Informality.................................65
2.6.4. Standing (locus standi)................................ 66
2.6.5. Access to reasons......................................67
2.6.6. Aims of adminstrative law..............................67
2.7. The ADJRA ----- Purpose and content.........................68
2.7.1. Grounds of review...................................... 68
2.7.2. Innovations............................................70
2.7.3. Back-door innovation: damages..........................71
2.8. The ADJRA — Failure.........................................71
2.8.1. Exceptions.............................................72
2.8.2. Limited scope..........................................72
2.8.3. Conduct toward.........................................73
2.8.4. Obscurity of individual grounds........................74
2.8.5. . Obscurity of the grounds as a set....................75
3. Conclusion...........................................................76
4. Appendix 2013........................................................76
Chapter 2. Canada et Québec
André Braën..........................................................77
1. L’administration.................................................77
2. La procédure administrative et le fonctionnement de radministration,..78
3. La procédure judiciaire et le contrôle de la légalité administrative.80
4. En résumé........................................................81
Chapter 3. China
Li Zhang..............................................................83
1. Chinese conception of administrative procedure...................84
1.1. An “administrative” “procedure”.............................84
1.2. Classification of administrative procedure..................85
1.2.1. Classification based on the criterion of nature
of the act to be taken......................................86
BRUYLANT
422
CODIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE
1.2.2. Internal and external procedures ........................86
1.2.3. Prior and posterior procedures...........................87
2. Characteristics of the Chinese law of administrative procedure.....88
2.1. A scattered legislation......................................89
2.1.1. Sector-based regulations.................................89
2.1.2. The new tendency focused on the administrative acts......89
2.2. In search of a good balance between the guarantee of the
administrative power and the protection of the citizens5 rights.90
2.2.1. Recognition of the own values of the procedure...........90
2.2.2. Procedural systems in favor of the citizens..............92
2.3. Multiple references to foreign legal systems ................94
3. Prospect of a codification in China................................96
3.1. What shall the future codification consist of? ..............98
3.1.1. A codification exceeding what its title means............98
3.1.2. Topics and systems to bring into the future codification .... 99
3.2. Controversy, inertia and controversial actions..............100
3.3. What objective to pursue?...................................101
3.3.1. Reification of the “procedural legality55...............101
3.3.2. Affirmation of a “minimal procedural justice55
in an essential law.........................................102
Chapter 4. Republic of Croatia
J.S.D. Dario Derba.....................................................107
Chapter 5. Czech Republic
Josef StaSa, CSc.......................................................123
1. Scope of comparison: what do we mean
by “administrative procedure55 ?...................................124
2. Main features of the law on administrative procedure
in the Czech Republic..............................................127
3. Codification of administrative procedure..........................129
Chapter 6. Denmark
Niels Fenqer...........................................................135
1. Scope of the comparison: what do we mean
by “administrative procedure55?....................................135
1.1. Procedure?..................................................135
1.2. Administrative procedure....................................138
BRUYLANT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
423
1.2.1. The extent to which Danish law draw a distinction
between governmental processes (which would not
be subject to the rules concerning “administrative”
procedure) and administrative ones.........................138
1.2.2. Where is. in Danish law, located the boundary
between administrative and judicial procedure?.............138
2. Main features of Danish law on administrative procedure
(apart from whether it is codified or not).......................140
2.1. Historical development and origin of its basic principles...140
2.2. Importance of the procedural dimension
in Danish administrative law.................................141
2.3. How far is Danish law on administrative procedure
influenced by international (European) rules and standards?...142
3. The extent to which Danish law on administrative procedure
is codified.......................................................144
4. Time and structure of the codifies acts...........................147
4.1. When was it codified?.......................................147
4.2. How are the codes structured? Which are the main
concepts that determine their architecture?...................148
4.3. What room does Danish law allow to direct
participation of the citizens?................................149
4.4. Was the codification process the occasion for a special
effort in the sense of conceptualization and theorization
of administrative procedure law?..............................150
4.5. Does there still exist special pieces of legislation about
administrative procedure, which complement the code,
or deviate from it?...........................................151
4.6. As to the effects of the codification.......................151
4.6.1. What room did it leave to jurisprudential creation?....151
4.6.2. Has it been considered as satisfactory (in terms
of administrative efficiency, in terms of simplification
and in terms of democratization)?...........................152
5. Areas where Danish law on administrative procedure is not codified... 153
5.1. Is there a (doctrinal or political) debate on codifying?....153
5.2. What are the sources of procedural administrative
law (Constitution, statutory legislation, governmental
regulation, soft law, case-law)?........................153
5.3. What room for jurisprudential creativity?...................154
BRUYLANT
424
CODIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE
5.4. To what extent are administrative authorities free
to adapt general rules to their own procedural needs?........154
Chapter 7. Estonia
Ivo PiLVING..........................................................157
1. Scope of the study: what do we mean
by “administrative procedure”?...................................157
1.1. “Procedure”................................................157
1.2. “Administrative”......................................... 159
2. Main features of the law on administrative procedure in Estonia..160
2.1. Historical development, origin of its basic principles.....160
2.2. Fundamental orientations...................................161
2.3. Importance of the procedural dimension
in the Estonian administrative law...........................162
2.4. Main debates related to administrative procedural law......164
2.5. Influence of international (European) rules and standards
ou Estonian law ou administrative procedure..................164
3. APA as the codification of administrative procedure in Estonia...165
3.1. Legislative history........................................165
3.2. Structure and main concepts of the APA.....................166
3.2.1. Structure........................................... 166
3.2.2. Administrative acts and regulatory acts...............167
3.2.3. Contractual procedures................................168
3.3. Extent of freedom available to administrative authorities
in the arrangement of their procedures.......................168
3.4. Availability of direct participation to the citizens?......169
3.5. Meaning of the codification process for the development
of administrative procedural law.............................170
3.6. Ambit of the codification................................ 170
3.7. Effects of the codification.............................. 170
3.7.1. Case law............................................ 170
3.7.2. Deficits in APA.......................................171
Chapter 8. Finland
Outi SUVIRANTA.......................................................173
1. Introduction to the Legislation on Administrative Procedure
in Finland.......................................................173
2. Background for the Codification Work in Finland.........177
BRUYLANT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
425
3. Drafting of the APA of 1982: Citizen-Salient Approach ..........178
4. Structure of the APA of 2003....................................180
5. Ambit of the Codification.......................................181
6. Direct Participation of Individuals.............................182
7. Margin of Freedom of Administrative Authorities in Arranging
their Procedures ................................................183
8. Survey on the APA of 2003 — Expectations for the Future.........184
Chapter 9. France
Stephane Braconnier.................................................187
1. Introduction: A quick approach to French administrative law.....187
1.1. The historical origins and the sources of French
administrative law and procedure.............................187
1.2. The scope of administrative law in France
and the notion of administrative acts under French law.......189
1.3. General considerations on the codification process in France ... 190
2. The scope of the comparison: The meaning
of “administrative procedure”....................................190
2.1. What is administrative?...................................190
2.1.1. The distinction between governmental processes
and administrative processes...............................190
2.1.2. The boundary between administrative and judicial
procedure..................................................191
2.1.3. The existence of specialized administrative courts....191
2.2. What is procedure?.........................................191
2.2.1. Non-contentious administrative procedure:
Administrative procedure stricto sensu.....................192
2.2.2. Non-jurisdictional contentious administrative procedure... 192
2.2.3. Jurisdictional contentious administrative procedure:
Administrative litigation..................................192
3. The codification of the rules on administrative litigation......193
3.1. The drafting of the Code: A codification on
the basis of established law..................................193
3.2. The structure of the Code..................................194
3.3. Fundamental orientations...................................195
3.4. The influence of international and
European rules and standards..................................195
BRUYLANT
426
CODIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE
3.5. The effects of the codification............................197
4. The absence of codification of the rules on administrative
procedure stricto sensu............................................197
4.1. The sources of procedural administrative law...............198
4.2. The influence of international and
European rules and standards...................................199
4.3. The room left to jurisprudential activity..................200
4.4. The room for direct participation of the citizens
in administrative processes ..................................200
5. Bibliography.................................................. 201
5.1. Unofficial codes............................................201
5.2. Textbooks...................................................201
5.3. Articles....................................................201
Chapter 10. Germany
Jens-Peter Schneider...................................................203
1. Introduction and overview.........................................203
2. The history of German administrative procedure
law and the codification process until 1976...............204
3. Multi-level codification and executive federalism in Germany......207
4. The limited scope of “administrative procedure”
in the German A PA.................................................209
4.1. Scope of the APA I: administrative activities
of authorities under public law............................ 209
4.2. Scope of the APA II: limited definition of administrative
procedure and inclusion of substantive annex matters...........211
4.3. Scope of the APA III: open subsidiarity to sector specific law.. 213
5. The procedural concept and architecture of the German APA........214
5.1. “Informal” proceedings for unilateral decision making
as the APA s standard model....................................215
5.2. Formal administrative proceedings and proceedings
for planning approvals.........................................219
5.3. Public law contracts.................................... 220
6. Elements and limits of procedural thinking in German adminis-
trative law: a case for reform?.................................222
BRUYLANT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
427
Chapter 11. Greece
Vassiliki Kovmpli.................................................227
1. The concept of “administrative procedure .....................227
1.1. The scope of the term “administrative procedure”.........227
1.2. The extent of the term “administrative procedure”........229
1.2.1. Exclusion of government processes...................229
1.2.2. Exclusion of judicial review procedures.............230
2. Main features of administrative procedure law..................231
2.1. The evolution of administrative procedure law............231
2.1.1. Historical underpinnings............................231
2.1.2. Legal underpinnings ................................232
2.2. Fundamental orientations of administrative procedure law.233
2.2.1. The priority of the rule of law.....................233
2.2.2. The importance of the procedural dimension..........235
3. The Greek Administrative Procedure Code........................236
3.1. Historical background of the Administrative Procedure Code. .236
3.1.1. The debate about making a code......................236
3.1.2. The debate about the content of the code............237
3.2. The structure of the Administrative Procedure Code.......239
3.2.1. First Chapter.......................................239
3.2.2. Second Chapter......................................240
3.2.3. Third Chapter.......................................240
3.2.4. Fourth Chapter......................................241
3.2.5. Fifth Chapter.......................................241
3.2.6. Sixth Chapter.......................................242
3.3. An assessment of the Administrative Procedure Code.......242
Chapter 12. Israel
Yoav Dotan..........................................................245
1. Background.....................................................245
2. Codification...................................................247
3. Administrative Procedure - Principal Requirements..............249
3.1. Bias and Conflict of Interest............................249
3.2. Hearing and Consultation.................................249
3.3. The Duty to Give Reasons ................................250
BRUYLANT
428
CODIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE
3.4. Access to Information.....................................250
3.5. Additional Duties.........................................251
3.6. General Duty of Fairness..................................251
Chapter 13. Netherlands
Tom Barkhuysen, Willemien den Ouden and Ymre E. Schuurmans..........253
1. Introduction....................................................253
2. Historical Development..........................................254
3. Scope of the Comparison: “Administrative Procedure”
in the Netherlands...............................................256
3.1. Procedure.................................................256
3.2. Administrative law in relation to other branches of law ..257
3.3. Administrative and judicial procedures....................259
4. The Codification of the GALA....................................261
4.1. Nature and structure of the GALA..........................261
4.2. Relationship between the GALA and specific legislation....266
4.3. Towards uniformity in administrative law..................267
5. Main debates relating to administrative procedure and the GALA ...267
6. International/European Influence................................272
6.1. EU influence.......................................... 273
6.2. ECHR......................................................275
7. Conclusion......................................................276
Chapter 14. Norway
Eivind Smith.........................................................277
1. Introduction: The public administration and the courts .........277
2. The impact of the system of judicial review on the law on
administrative procedure.........................................279
2.1. Introduction .............................................279
2.2. Focusing on administrative procedure stricto sensu .......280
2.3. The relative un-importance of the distinction
between administrative and other procedures .................281
3. “Codification of administrative procedures”.....................281
3.1. “Codification”............................................281
3.2. “Administrative”.................................. ....284
3.3. “Procedures”..............................................284
4. Main features of the law on administrative procedure in Norway .286
BRUYLANT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
429
5. Norwegian law on administrative procedure codified .............289
5.1. The Public Administration Act..............................289
5.2. Main content ..............................................290
5.3. The 1967 Act and administrative
bodies submitted to lex specialis............................292
6. Some remarks on the effects of codification......................293
7. Appendix.........................................................294
Chapter 15. Paraguay
Javier Parquet Villaora..............................................321
1. Scope of the comparison: what do we mean
by “administrative procedure”?...................................321
1.1. “Procedure55 ?............................................321
1.2. “Administrative”..........................................324
2. Main features of the law on administrative procedure in your
country (apart from whether it is codified or not)................325
3. Is your national law on administrative procedure codified? .. 327
4. If it is codified............................................. 327
5. If your national law on administrative procedure is not codified.328
Chapter 16. Poland
Zbigniew Kmieciak...................................................329
Chapter 17. Portugal
José Eduardo Figueiredo Dias........................................345
1. Scope of the comparison: what do we mean
by “administrative procedure”?..................................345
1.1. “Procedure”?..............................................345
1.2. “Administrative”..........................................346
2. Main features of the law on administrative procedure in your
county (apart from whether it is codified or not)...............347
2.1. Historical development, origin of its basic principles
(legislation, case-law...).............................«....347
2.2. Fundamental orientations..................................347
. 2.3. Importance of the procedural dimension
in your administrative law..................................348
2.4. What are the main debates related to administrative
procedural law: Simplification? Democratization? Others?.....348
BRUYLANT
430
CODIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE
2.5. How far is your national law on administrative procedure
influenced by international (European) rules and standards?...349
2.6. Is your national law on administrative procedure codified?.349
3. If it is codified................................................349
3.1. When was it codified?......................................349
3.2. How is the code structured? Which are the main
concepts that determine its architecture?.....................350
3.3. What margin of freedom does it leave to administrative
authorities in the arrangement of their procedures?...........351
3.4. What room does it allow to direct participation of the citizens? ..351
3.5. Was the codification process the occasion for a special
effort in the sense of conceptualization and theorization
of administrative procedure law?..............................351
3.6. What was the ambit of the codification?....................352
4. As to the effects of the codification............................353
Chapter 18. Sweden
Lars-Gdran Malmberg...................................................355
1. Salient features of administrative procedures in Sweden..........355
1.1. Historical development and origin of basic principles......355
1.2. Importance of procedural dimensions
under Swedish administrative law..............................357
1.3. The codification of administrative procedure in Sweden.....359
2. What is meant by “administrative procedure”?.....................360
3. Final comments...................................................362
Chapter 19. Switzerland
Thierry Tanquerel.....................................................365
1. The purview of administrative procedure..........................365
1.1. The central position of the administrative decision........365
1.2. The absence of procedure applying to rulemaking............368
1.3. The double nature of citizen participation.................369
1.4. The distinction between administrative
and judicial authorities......................................370
2. Regulation of administrative procedure in Switzerland............371
2.1. The mark of federalism.....................................371
2.2. History....................................................373
2.3. Sources....................................................375
BRUYLANT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
431
2.3.1. International sources...................................375
2.3.2. National sources........................................376
2.4. Main features...............................................376
2.4.1. Party status............................................376
2.4.2. The rights of the parties...............................377
2.4.3. Coordination and the global weight of interests.........378
2.4.4. Access to justice......................................379
2.5. The debated questions......................................379
3. Codification......................................................382
3.1. Codification at the federal level...........................382
3.2. Codification at the cantonal level..........................383
3.3. The room left for case law and administrative practice.....384
4. Conclusion.......................................................384
Chapter 20. United States
Dominique Custos......................................................387
1. Scope of the comparison: what do we mean
by “administrativeprocedure”?.....................................387
1.1. “Procedure”?...............................................387
1.2. “Administrative”...........................................400
2. Main features of the law on administrative procedure
in your country (apart from whether it is codified or not)........401
2.1. The APA, first administrative procedure codification
in the common law world.......................................401
2.2. The use of the world code with regard to the APA...........403
2.2.1. The code status and functions of the APA...............404
2.2.2. Unwarranted code label?................................408
3. Is your national law of administrative procedure codified?.......411
3.1. When was it codified?......................................411
3.1.1. The search for a model of administrative procedure.....411
3.1.2. The drafting of the APA................................413
3.1.3. The impact of the APA on the sources
of administrative procedure................................414
3.2. How is the code structured? Which are the main
concepts that determine its architecture?.....................415
3.2.1. The APAs focus on the regulated public s participation.415
BRUYLANT
3.2.2. Legislative and executive oversight of agencies are
dealt with outside the APA...................................417
3.3. Was the codification process the occasion for a special
effort in the sense of conceptualization and theorization
of administrative procedure law?................................418
3.4. What was the ambit of the codification?.......................418
3.4.1. Does there still exist special pieces of legislation about
administrative procedure, which complement the code,
or deviate from it?..........................................418
3.5. As to the effects of the codification.........................418
3.5.1. What room did it leave to jurisprudential creation?......418
3.5.2. Has it been considered as satisfactory (in terms of
administrative efficiency, in terms of simplification,
in terms of democratization...) ?............................418
Codification of Administrative Procedure
The (aw on administrative procedure regulates the processes through
which administrative decisions and administrative projects are
elaborated. It is more and more regarded as essential in administrative
laws: it is really considered as the central part of it in some systems.
In many jurisdictions, rules concerning administrative procedure are
codified, gathered in a single piece of general legislation: in a few, it
remains non codified.
The book is made of the different contributions presented on the topic
to the last congress of the International Academy of International Law
(Taipei, 2012): national reports on twenty countries and a general report.
These contributions examine the way administrative procedure became
codified, the obstacles which had to be overcome, the main orientations
of the codes, their evolution in time; alternatively, they explain why
administrative procedure is not codified.
Providing extensive materials on an issue which is a concern in many
administrative laws and many administrative systems, the book is
intended for all searchers and experts in administrative law and public
management, whether academics or practitioners.
%/ European Law
www.bruylant.be • www.stradalex.com
COADPR
ISBN : 978-2-8027-4347-7
|
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| author2 | Auby, Jean-Bernard |
| author2_role | edt |
| author2_variant | j b a jba |
| author_GND | (DE-588)143199609 |
| author_facet | Auby, Jean-Bernard |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV044648907 |
| classification_rvk | PN 980 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)985114763 (DE-599)BSZ402305841 |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01868nam a2200409 cb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV044648907</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20180515 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">171123s2014 |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9782802743477</subfield><subfield code="9">978-2-8027-4347-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)985114763</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BSZ402305841</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-703</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PN 980</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)137857:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Codification of administrative procedure</subfield><subfield code="c">edited by Jean-Bernard Auby</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Bruxelles</subfield><subfield code="b">Bruylant</subfield><subfield code="c">[2014]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">VII, 431 Seiten</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Collection administrative law</subfield><subfield code="v">13</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">European law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Kodifikation</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4031459-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rechtsvergleich</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4115712-6</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Verwaltungsverfahren</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4063359-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Verwaltungsverfahren</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4063359-7</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Kodifikation</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4031459-5</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Rechtsvergleich</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4115712-6</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Auby, Jean-Bernard</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)143199609</subfield><subfield code="4">edt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Collection administrative law</subfield><subfield code="v">13</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV023234036</subfield><subfield code="9">13</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung UB Bayreuth - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030046678&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung UB Bayreuth - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030046678&sequence=000002&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Klappentext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030046678</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV044648907 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T07:58:12Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9782802743477 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030046678 |
| oclc_num | 985114763 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-703 |
| owner_facet | DE-703 |
| physical | VII, 431 Seiten |
| publishDateSearch | 2014 |
| publishDateSort | 2014 |
| record_format | marc |
| series | Collection administrative law |
| series2 | Collection administrative law European law |
| spelling | Codification of administrative procedure edited by Jean-Bernard Auby Bruxelles Bruylant [2014] VII, 431 Seiten txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Collection administrative law 13 European law Kodifikation (DE-588)4031459-5 gnd rswk-swf Rechtsvergleich (DE-588)4115712-6 gnd rswk-swf Verwaltungsverfahren (DE-588)4063359-7 gnd rswk-swf Verwaltungsverfahren (DE-588)4063359-7 s Kodifikation (DE-588)4031459-5 s Rechtsvergleich (DE-588)4115712-6 s DE-604 Auby, Jean-Bernard (DE-588)143199609 edt Collection administrative law 13 (DE-604)BV023234036 13 Digitalisierung UB Bayreuth - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030046678&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis Digitalisierung UB Bayreuth - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030046678&sequence=000002&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Klappentext |
| spellingShingle | Codification of administrative procedure Collection administrative law Kodifikation (DE-588)4031459-5 gnd Rechtsvergleich (DE-588)4115712-6 gnd Verwaltungsverfahren (DE-588)4063359-7 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4031459-5 (DE-588)4115712-6 (DE-588)4063359-7 |
| title | Codification of administrative procedure |
| title_auth | Codification of administrative procedure |
| title_exact_search | Codification of administrative procedure |
| title_full | Codification of administrative procedure edited by Jean-Bernard Auby |
| title_fullStr | Codification of administrative procedure edited by Jean-Bernard Auby |
| title_full_unstemmed | Codification of administrative procedure edited by Jean-Bernard Auby |
| title_short | Codification of administrative procedure |
| title_sort | codification of administrative procedure |
| topic | Kodifikation (DE-588)4031459-5 gnd Rechtsvergleich (DE-588)4115712-6 gnd Verwaltungsverfahren (DE-588)4063359-7 gnd |
| topic_facet | Kodifikation Rechtsvergleich Verwaltungsverfahren |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030046678&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030046678&sequence=000002&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| volume_link | (DE-604)BV023234036 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT aubyjeanbernard codificationofadministrativeprocedure |