Granice pojęciowe metafizyki: = Conceptual boundaries of metaphysics
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Book |
| Language: | Polish |
| Published: |
Toruń
Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
2017
|
| Edition: | Wydanie 2 |
| Series: | Res Humanae
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Inhaltsverzeichnis Literaturverzeichnis Abstract Register // Personenregister |
| Physical Description: | 342 Seiten 21 cm |
| ISBN: | 9788323132158 |
Staff View
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV044625082 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20180613 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 171114s2017 |||| 00||| pol d | ||
| 020 | |a 9788323132158 |9 978-83-231-3215-8 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1028536272 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV044625082 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a pol | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Kołodziejczyk, Sebastian T. |d 1973- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1048710092 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Granice pojęciowe metafizyki |b = Conceptual boundaries of metaphysics |c Sebastian Tomasz Kołodziejczyk |
| 246 | 1 | 1 | |a Conceptual boundaries of metaphysics |
| 250 | |a Wydanie 2 | ||
| 264 | 1 | |a Toruń |b Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika |c 2017 | |
| 300 | |a 342 Seiten |c 21 cm | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a Res Humanae | |
| 505 | 8 | |a Bibliogr. s. [311]-331. Indeks | |
| 534 | |c 2006 | ||
| 546 | |a Zusammenfassung in englischer Sprache | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a Metafizyka |2 jhpk | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Ontologia |2 jhpk | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Transcendentalia |2 jhpk | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Filozofia nowożytna | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Filozofia starożytna | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Filozofia starożytnej Grecji | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Filozofia średniowieczna | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Filozofia współczesna | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Ontologia | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Metafizyka | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Pojęcia graniczne | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Scholastyka | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Teoria poznania | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Transcendentalia | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Metaphysik |0 (DE-588)4038936-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Ontologie |0 (DE-588)4075660-9 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Metaphysik |0 (DE-588)4038936-4 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Ontologie |0 (DE-588)4075660-9 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 775 | 0 | 8 | |i Nachdruck von |a Sebastian Tomasz Kołodziejczyk |t Granice pojęciowe metafizyki |d Wrocław : Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego, 2006 |h 318 Seiten |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030023253&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030023253&sequence=000002&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Literaturverzeichnis |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030023253&sequence=000003&line_number=0003&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Abstract |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030023253&sequence=000004&line_number=0004&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Register // Personenregister |
| 940 | 1 | |n oe | |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 001.09 |e 22/bsb |g 438 |
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030023253 | |
Record in the Search Index
| _version_ | 1809947204756963328 |
|---|---|
| adam_text |
SPIS T R E S C I
WPROWADZENIE .
Poj^cia graniczne .
Schem at poj^c g r a n ic z n y c h .
Deskryptyw na i konstytutyw na natura poj^c .
Transcendentalny Charakter poj^c g ran iczn y ch .
Bezposredniosc i z ap o sred n iczen ie.
Zakres i tresc poj^c g ra n icz n y ch .
Perspektywa historyczna i systematyczna. Sam ow iedza.
Uwagi k o h c o w e .
11
11
12
14
18
20
23
27
29
ROZDZIAt I. SCHEMATY POJ^CIOWE METAFIZYKI .
W st^ p .
Partykularnosc i o g ö ln o s c .
Byt, mysl i p ra w d a .
Dwa typy o g ö ln o sci.
O gölnosc id e i.
Najwyzsze r o d z a je .
Schem aty poj^ciowe m etafizyki.
Schem at poj^c kategorialnych (ogölnych).
Schem at poj^c o n to lo g icz n y ch .
Schem at p o j?c m etaiizy czn y ch .
Podsum ow anie.
ROZDZIAt II. BYT .
W st^ p .
Tradycyjne teorie b y tu .
Transcendentalne zasady b y tu .
Sem iotyczne teorie b y t u .
Podstawy analitycznej teorii b y t u .
O tym, co istn ie je .
Istniec to byc przed m iotem dosw iad czenia.
Sem iotyczne k on cep cje bytu - u zu p eln ien ie.
P od su m o w an ie.
33
33
38
46
54
55
63
65
66
68
72
79
8l
81
82
91
99
101
103
106
10 9
114
6
SPI S T R E S CI
ROZDZIAt III. TEORIE TRANSCENDENTALIÓW.
W st^ p .
Sredniowieczne zródla teorii transcendentaliów .
Teologiczny wymiar teorii transcendentaliów - Filip Kanclerz
Kontynuacja i rozwini^cie - Aleksander z H ales.
Nowe w^tki w teorii transcendentaliów - Albert W ielk i.
D ojrzala koncepcja transcendentaliów - Tomasz z Akw inu.
Jana D unsa Szkota teoria transcendentaliów .
Podsum ow anie.
117
117
1 19
121
128
134
14 2
158
16 7
ROZDZIAt IV. SCHEMAT POJ^C GRANICZNYCH .
W st^ p .
Analiza bytu a schem at poj^c g ran iczn ych .
Pryncypia a p o r c ia gran iczn e.
P o r c ia graniczne a refleksja in telek tu aln a.
Transcendentalne uprawomocnienie schematu poj^c
g ran iczn y ch .
Schem at poj^c granicznych a tzw. e p o c h e ontologiczna.
Sem iotyczne wíasnosci poj^c g ran iczn y ch .
P ojad a graniczne jako predykaty drugiego rz^du.
Podsum ow anie.
ROZDZIAt V. NATURA POJ£C GRANICZNYCH.
W s t£ p .
In terp retaba konceptualna (IK ) poj^c granicznych.
Ekstensjonalne aspekty róznicy m ifd zy poj^ciam i.
P ojad a graniczne a kategorie .
P ojad a graniczne a u n iw ersalia.
Niedefiniowalnosc poj^c granicznych.
Intensjonalne podstawy rozrózniania p o j^ c.
Klasyczna teoria p o j^ c .
Teoria poj^c jako prototypów .
Teoria poj^c jako te o r ii.
Teoria poj^ciowego atom izm u.
Propozycjonalna interpretacja (IP) poj^c granicznych .
P od su m ow anie.
ROZDZIAt VI. FUNKCJE POJ^C GRANICZNYCH.
W st^p.
Hipoteza o istnieniu podstawowego wyposazenia um yslu.
169
169
17 5
179
184
186
19 2
19 6
201
206
209
209
211
215
2 16
222
228
230
232
237
241
247
252
261
263
263
267
SPIS TRESCI
P
ojçciagran
iczn
ejakookreslen
iafu
n
d
am
en
taln
ychak
tó
w
um
ysiu.
P
ojçciag
ran
iczn
ejakookreslen
iap
rzek
on
anfu
n
d
am
en
taln
ych
P
ojçciag
ran
iczn
ejakookreslen
iafu
n
d
am
en
taln
ychfu
nkcji
p
rop
ozycjon
aln
ych
.
P
od
su
m
ow
an
ie.
ZAKOÑCZENIE.
BIBLIOGRAFIA .
SUMMARY .
INDERS OSOBOWY.
7
270
279
290
302
305
II
333
339
3
B IB LIO G R A FIA
¿rödla
A ckrill J. L.
1963, A ristotles C ateg ories a n d D e in t e r p r e t a t io n , tran
sl. an
ded
.b
y
J. L
.A
ck
rill, O
x
fo
rd
.
A lbert W ielki
1893, Super I Sententiarum , w
: O pera o m n ia ,t. 2
6
,P
a
ris.
1951, D e b o n o ,w
: O pera o m n ia X
X
V
III (ed
.k
o
lo
n
sk
a), red
.H
.K
ü
h
le,
M
ü
n
ster.
1972, Super D ionysium D e divinis n om in ibu s,w : O pera o m n ia X K X V ll, 1
(ed
.k
o
lo
n
sk
a), re
d
.P
.S
im
o
n
,M
ü
n
ster.
1978, Su m m a theologiae sive d e m irabili scien tia D ei I, w
: O p era o m n ia
X
X
X
IV
, 1(ed
.k
o
lo
n
sk
a), red
.D
.S
ied
ler, M
ü
n
ster.
A leksander z H ales
1924-1948, Sum m a theologica I - I V , red
.C
o
lleg
iu
mS
.B
o
n
äv
en
tu
rae,
Q
u
aracch
i.
A rysto teles
1990-2001, D ziela z eb ra n e ,1.1-7, p
rzek
ladz
b
io
ro
w
y
,W
a
rsz
a
w
a
.
1924,A ristotles M etaphysics ,red
.W
.D
.R
o
ss, O
x
fo
rd
.
1996, Ta m eta ta physika. M etaphysica. M etafizyka, p
rz
el. T
.Z
elezn
ik
,
L
u
b
lin
.
A ugustyn sw.
2001, D ialogi filozoficzn e, p
rzek
ladz
b
io
ro
w
y
,K
ra
k
o
w
.
Awicenna
1973, M etafizyka, p
rz
el. M
.G
o
g
acz,W
a
rsz
a
w
a
.
D io gen es L a ertio s
1982,
Zywoty i poglqdy stynnychfilozoföw , p
rz
ek
la
dz
b
io
ro
w
y
,W
a
rsz
a
w
a
.
D io n izy A reopagita
1997, P ism a teologiczne, p
rz
el. M
.D
zielsk
a, K
ra
k
o
w
.
F il ip K anclerz
1985, S u m m a d e bon o, red
.N
.W
iek
i, C
o
rp
u
sp
h
ilo
so
p
h
o
ru
mm
ed
ii
a
ev
i II, B
ern
.
3 12
BIBLIOGRAFIA
Jan D uns Szkot
16
3
9
, Opus O xoniense ,re
d
.L
.W
a
d
d
in
g
,L
y
o
n
.
18
9
3
, Q uaestiones subtilissimae super libros Metaphysicorum Aristotelis ,
w
: Opera o m n ia ,t. 7
,re
d
.L
.V
iv
e
s, P
a
ris.
1
8
9
4
,Lectura in librum IVSententiarum ,w
:O
p
e
raomnia ,1.1
6
,re
d
.L
.V
i
v
e
s,P
a
ris.
1950-, O
p
e
raom n ia (ed
.w
a
ty
k
a
risk
a
),re
d
.A
.S
e
p
in
sk
iiC
.B
a
lic,R
z
y
m
.
K irk G
.S
.,R aven J.E
., Schofield M
.
1
9
6
9
, The Presocratic Philosophers ,C
a
m
b
rid
g
e.
1999, Filozofia przedsokratejska, p
rz
el. A
.L
a
n
g
,W
a
rsz
a
w
a
.
L e ^niak K.
19
7
2
, M aterialisci greccy w epoce przedsokratejskiej ,W
a
rsz
a
w
a
.
P laton
Platonis O pera ,t. 1-5, re
d
. J.B
u
rn
et, O
x
fo
rd
.
19
5
6
, Sofista .Polityk ,p
rz
e
LW
.W
itw
ick
i, W
a
rsz
a
w
a
.
1
9
9
7
)Fedon, p
rz
e
LR
.L
e
g
u
tk
o
,K
ra
k
o
w
.
19
9
8
, D ialogi ,1.1-2, p
rzelW
.W
itw
ick
i,K
$
ty
.
1
9
9
9
)P
a
n
sfw
o
. Praw a, p
rzelW
.W
itw
ick
i, K
p
y
.
T omasz z A kwinu
1888-1906, Sum m a theologiae ,w
:O
p
e
raom n ia IV
-X
II (e
d
.L
eo
n
ian
a),
R
z
y
m
.
1918-1930, Sum m a contra gentiles, w
: O pera om nia X
III-X
V(ed
.L
eo
n
ia
n
a
), R
z
y
m
.
1929- 1947, Scriptum super libros Sententiarum I-IV
, re
d
.M
a
n
d
o
n
n
et,
M
.F
.M
o
o
s, P
a
ris.
1930- 1935, Sum m a filozoficzn a „
Contra gentiles' ,k
si^
g
iI-IV
,p
rz
ek
la
d
z
b
io
ro
w
y
,K
ra
k
o
w
.
1
9
5
0
,In librum Beatii Dionisii De divinis nominibus expositio ,re
d
.C
.P
e
ra
,
T
u
ry
n
.
19
5
6
, Questiones quodlibetales ,re
d
.R
.M
.S
p
ia
z
z
i,T
u
ry
n
.
19
6
5
, Questiones disputatae de a n im a , red
.M
.C
a
lca
terrai T
.C
en
ti,
T
u
ry
n
.
19
7
1
, In X II libros M etaphysicourm Aristotelis expositio , re
d
.M
.R
.C
ath
a
la
,R
.M
.S
p
ia
z
z
i,T
u
ry
n
.
19
9
2
, O p ra w d zie ,kw. 1
, a r t 1-2, „
P
rz
e
g
l^
dT
o
m
isty
cz
n
y
”V
.
1
9
9
4
)D
ee
n
fee
f essentia („0 bycie i istocie”), tek
st la
cin
sk
i ip
o
lsk
i
w
p
rz
ek
la
d
z
ieizk
o
m
en
ta
rz
em
M
.A
.K
r^
p
ca
,L
u
b
lin
.
19
9
6
, O
duszy ,p
rzel Z
.W
lo
d
ekiW
.Z
eg
a
,K
ra
k
o
w
.
19
9
8
, Kwestie dyskutow ane 0 p raw d zie , t. 1-2, p
rzel A
.A
d
u
sz
k
iew
icz
,
L
.K
u
cz
y
risk
i, J. R
u
sz
cz
y
risk
i, P
o
z
n
a
n
.
BI BLI OGRAFI A
3 13
1
999, D e veritate. O p ra w d z ie, tek
stlacih
sk
i ip
o
isk
iw
p
rzek
lad
zieA
.B
ialk
a
,L
u
b
lin
.
1
9
9
9
a
, T raktat o czlow ieku , p
rz
eLi k
o
m
en
tarzemo
p
atrzy
lS
.S
w
iezaw
sk
i,
K
?ty
.
1
999b
, T raktat 0 Bogu. S u m m a teologii, k
w
estie1-26, p
rz
eLG
.K
u
ry
lew
icz,
Z
.N
ercz
u
k
,M
.O
lszew
sk
i, K
ra
k
o
w
.
2003, Su m m a contra gen tiles ,t. 1
,p
rz
eLZ
.W
lod
ekiW
.Z
eg
a, P
o
zn
an
.
Opracowania
Aertsen J. A
.
1985, The C onvertibility o f B ein g a n d G o o d in St. T h om as A q u in a s,
„
T
h
eN
ew
Sch
o
lasticism
”59, s. 449-470.
1986, T ran szen den tal versus k ateg o ria l: D ie Z w iesp ältig keit von T hom as'
P h ilosop h ie? E ine kritische S tu d ie, „
V
iv
a
riu
m
”24, s. 143-158.
1988, D ie L eh re d e r T ran szen d en talien u n d d ie M etaphysik. D e r K o m
m en tar von T hom as von A qu in zu m IV. B u ch d e r M etap h y sica, „
F
reib
u
r
g
erZ
eitsch
riftfü
rP
h
ilo
so
p
h
ieu
n
dT
h
eo
lo
g
ie”35, s. 293-316.
1988, N atu re a n d C reature. T h om as A q u in a s W ay o f T hought, L
eid
en
-N
ew
Y
o
rk
.
1989,M eth od a n d M etaphysics. The ‘v ia resolu tion s" in T h om as A qu in as,
„
T
h
eN
ew
S
ch
o
lasticism
”63, s. 405-418.
1991, The M ed iev a l D octrin e o f T ra n scen d en tals: The C u rren t S tate o f
R esearch, „
B
u
lletind
ep
h
ilo
so
p
h
iem
éd
iév
ale”33, s. 130-147.
1992, Truth as T ran scen d en tal in T h om as A qu in as, w
: J. J. E
.G
racia
(red
.) 1992, s. 159-171.
1996, M ed iev a l P h ilosop h y a n d the T ran scen den tals. The C a se o f T h om as
A qu inas, L
eid
en
-N
ew
Y
ork
-K
öln
.
1998,(red
.w
ra
zzA
. Sp
eer), W as ist P h ilo s o p h ie im M ittela lter?, B
erlin-N
ew
Y
o
rk
.
1998a, The P h ilosop h ical Im p o r ta n c e o f th e D octrin e o f T ran scen d en tals
in T hom as A qu in as, „
R
ev
u
eIn
tern
atio
n
aled
eP
h
ilo
so
p
h
ie”204, s. 249-268.
1998b
, B e in g a n d O n e: The D o ctrin e o f th e C o n v ertib ile T ran scen d en tals
in D uns Scotus, „
F
ran
ciscanS
tu
d
ies”56, s. 47-64.
1998c, W h a t is F irst a n d M ost F u n d a m e n ta l ?The B eginnings o f T rans
cen d en ta l P h ilosop h y , w
: J. A
.A
ertsen(red
.) 1998, s. 177-192.
1999, T he M ed iev a l D o c trin e o f T ran scen d en tals: N ew L iteratu re, „B
u
lle
tind
ep
h
ilo
so
p
h
iem
éd
iév
ale”41, s. 107-121.
3H
BIBLIOGRAFÍA
A
cz
e
lP
.
1
9
8
0
, Frege Structures an d the Notions o f Propositions , Truth, an d Set ,
w
: J. K
e
isle
r,J. B
arw
ise
,K
.K
u
n
en(red
.), The Kleene Symposioum ,A
m
ste
rd
a
m
.
Ajdukiew icz K
.
1
9
6
0
/
1
9
6
5
,J$zyk i p ozn an ie ,t. 1-2, W
a
rsz
a
w
a
.
1
9
6
0
a
, W spraw ie „uniwersaliow ”
,w
:K
.A
jd
u
k
iew
iczi960, s
. 196-210.
1
9
6
5
a
, W sp ra w iep o jfc ia istnienia ,w
:K
,A
jd
u
k
ie
w
icz1
9
6
5
,s
, 143-154.
19
7
3
, Logika pragm atyczna, W
a
rsz
a
w
a
.
A lston W
.
1988, Epistem ic Justification. The Essays in the Theory o f Knowledge,
Ith
a
ca
,N
Y
.
A nscombe G
.E
.M
.
1981, The Collected Philosophical Papers: From Parm enides to W ittgen
stein, O
x
fo
rd
.
A nscombe G
.E
.M
., G each RF
.
19
8
1
, Trzej filozofow ie, p
rz
el. B
.C
h
w
e
d
e
ricz
u
k
,W
a
rsz
a
w
a
.
A rmstrong S
., G leitman L
., Gleitman H
.
19
8
3
,
W hat Som e Concepts Might Not Be ,„
C
o
g
n
itio
n
”1
3
,s. 263-308.
Audi R
.
1
9
9
3
*The Structure o f Justification, C
a
m
b
rid
g
e.
Austin S
.
1986,
Parm enides: Being, Bounds , and Logic ,N
e
w
H
a
v
en
-L
o
n
d
o
n
.
B arnes J., Schofield M
., S orabji R
.
19
7
9
, Articles on Aristotle III ,L
o
n
d
o
n
.
19
9
9
, The Presocractic Philosophers ,L
o
n
d
o
n
.
B arthlein K.
19
7
2
, D ie Transzendentalienlehre der alien Ontologie ,I: Die Transzendentalienlehre im Corpus Aristotelicum ,B
erlin
-N
ew
Y
o
rk
.
B ealer G
.
19
8
2
, Quality an d Concept, O
x
fo
rd
.
B e ;as A.
1994,
Vom Seienden als solchen zum Sinn des Seins. Die Transzendenta
lienlehre bei Edith Stein und Thomas von A quin ,F
ra
n
k
fu
rta
.M
a
in
.
B
ertiE
.
2001,M ultiplicity a n d Unity o f Being in Aristotle, w
:Proceedings inA ristotleian Society ,L
o
n
d
o
n
.
B ilgrami A
.
1992, B elief an d M eaning: The Unity a n d Locality o f M ental C ontent ,
O
x
fo
rd
.
BIBLIOGRAFIA
31 5
B la ckburn S
.
1984, Spreading the W
o
rd
,O
x
fo
rd
*
B la nd zi S
.
1992, H en ologia, m eo n to lo g ia , d ia le k ty k a ,W
a
rsz
a
w
a
.
2002, P latohski p ro jek t filo z o fii p ierw sz ej, W
a
rsz
a
w
a
.
B lo c k N
.
1986, A d vertisem en t f o r a S em an tics f o r P sychology, w
:P
.A
.F
ren
ch
,
T
.E
.U
eh
lin
gJr., H
.K
.W
ettstein(red
.), M id w est Studies in P h ilo so p h y ,
t. 10: Studies in the P h ilosop h y o f M in d, M
in
n
eap
o
lis, M
N
.
B o c h en sk i I. M
.
1992, W spolczesn e m eto d y m yslen ia, p
rzel. S
. Ju
d
y
ck
i, P
o
zn
an
.
1993, L o g ik a ifilo z o fia , W
a
rsz
a
w
a
.
B o h n er P
h
.
1945, The System o f M etaphysics o f A le x a n d e r o f H ales, „F
ran
ciscanStu
d
ies”26, N
ew
S
eries, t. 5
, s. 366-414.
B on J o u r L
.
1985, The Structure o f E m p irical K n ow led g e ,C
am
b
rid
g
e, M
A
.
B o r k o w sk i L
.
1970, L o g ik a fo r m a ln a , W
arszaw
a.
BosE
.P
.
1985, (red
.), M ed iev al S em an tics a n d M etaphysics (Studies d e d ic a te d to
L. M
. d e R ijk), N
ijm
eg
en
.
B ra d ley F
.H
.
1962, Essays on Truth a n d R ea lity ,O
xfo
rd
.
B ren ta n o F.
1999, P sychologia z em p iry czn eg o p u n k tu w id z en ia ,p
rzel. W
.G
alew
icz,
W
arszaw
a.
B ro w n S
. F.
1998, (red
.), M eetin g the M inds. The R elation s betw een M ed iev a l a n d
C lassica l M od ern E u rop ean P h ilo so p h y ,T
u
rn
h
o
u
t.
B
u
d
aS
.
1999, Z arys m eta fizy k i a b so lu tn o sci, K
rak
o
w
.
Burge T
.
1977, B e lie f d e re, „Jo
u
rn
al ofP
h
ilo
so
p
h
y’74, s. 338-362.
2005, Truth, Thought, R e a s o n : E ssays on Frege, O
xfo
rd
.
Ca rey S
.
1991, K n ow led g e A cqu isition : E n rich m en t o r C o n cep tu a l C h a n g e?,
w
:S
.C
arey
,R
.G
elm
an(red
.), The E pigenesis o f M ind: Essays on B iolog y
a n d C og n itio n , H
illsd
ale-N
ew
Y
o
rk
.
316
BIBLIOGRAFIA
C arnap R.
1952,
Fundam entals o f Concept Form ation in Em pirical Science ,C
h
ica
g
o
.
1959, T he E lim in ation o f M etaphysics through Logical A nalysis o f
L an gu age, w
:A
. J. A
y
e
r(red
.), L
o
g
ica
lP
o
sitiv
ism
,N
e
w
Y
o
rk
,s. 60-81.
C hisholm R.
1957, Perceiving: A Philosophical Study, Ith
a
ca
,N
Y
.
1982, The Foundations o f Knowing, M
in
n
ea
p
o
lis.
1994, Teoria p o zn an ia , p
rz
e
l. R
.Z
iem
iñ
sk
a
,L
u
b
lin
.
C hudy W
.
1993, R ozw ójfilozofow an ia a „pulapka refleksji ”Filozofia refleksji i p rób y je j przezw yci^zenia, L
u
b
lin
.
CONWAY P
.
1996,M etaphysics o f Aquinas: a Sum m ary o f Aquinas Exposition o fA r i
stotles M etaphysics, L
o
n
d
o
n
,
COPLESTON F.
1989-2001,H istoriafilozofii (w
sz
y
stk
ieto
m
y
,z
w
la
sz
cz
a1-3), p
rz
ek
la
d
z
b
io
ro
w
y
,W
a
rsz
a
w
a
.
C ross R.
2000, Duns Scotus, O
x
fo
rd
.
C zezowski T
.
1
9
4
8
/
2
0
0
4
, O m etafizyce, je j kierunkach i zagadn ien iach, T
o
ru
ñ
.
1964, Oindyw iduach oraz istnieniu , w
: Szkice filozoficzn e R om an ow i
Ingardenow i w d a rze ,W
a
rsz
a
w
a
-K
ra
k
o
w
.
1965, C
z
y
m w artosci (w prow adzenie do dyskusji ), „Z
n
ak
”z
.4
,
s. 408-410.
1977, Transcendentalia - przyczynek do ontologii , „
R
u
chF
ilo
zo
ficzn
y
”
,
n
r1-2, s. 5
5
.
D
a
v
id
so
nD
.
1991,
O
sch em a ciep ojfciow y m ,„
L
itera
tu
ran
aS
w
ie
cie
”
,5
, s. 100-119.
D avis B.
1993,
Thought o f Thomas A quinas ,O
x
fo
rd
.
D em binski B.
1999, Teoria idei: ew olucja mysli Platonskiej ,K
a
to
w
ice.
D ev itt M
.
1995, C om ing to O ur Senses ,C
a
m
b
rid
g
e.
1997, Realism an d Truth ,P
rin
ceto
n
.
D ilcher R.
1995, Studies in H eraclitus ,N
e
w
Y
o
rk
.
D odd J. M
.N
.
2000, Identity Theory o f Truth, L
o
n
d
o
n
.
B I B L I OG R A F I A
317
D o ig }. C.
1972,A qu in as on M etaphysics. A H isto rico -d o ctrin a l Stu dy o f th e C o m
m en tary on the M etaphysics, T
h
eH
ag
u
e.
D onceel J.
1974, T ran scen den tal T h om ism ,„
T
h
eM
o
n
ist”58, s. 67-85.
D oyle J. P
.
1997, B etw een T ran scen den tal a n d T ran scen d en tal: The M issin g Link?,
„
T
h
eR
ev
iew
ofM
etap
h
y
sics”50, s. 783-815.
1998, Sup er tran scen d en tal B eing: On the Verge o f M o d ern P h ilo s o p h y ,
w
:S
. EB
ro
w
n(red
.) 1998, s. 297-316.
D r etsk e E
1981,
K n ow led g e a n d the F low o f In fo rm a tio n , C
am
b
rid
g
e, M
A
.
D u m m e tt M
.
1973, Frege: P h ilosop h y o f L an g u ag e, L
o
n
d
o
n
.
1978, Truth a n d O th er E n igm as, O
xfo
rd
.
1981, The In terp retation o f F rege P h ilosop h y , L
o
n
d
o
n
.
1993, The S eas o f L an g u ag e, O
xfo
rd
.
1998,
L o g icz n a p o d s ta w a m eta fiz y k i, p
rz
eLW
.S
a
d
y
,W
arszaw
a.
D umont S
.D
.
1992, T ran scen d en tal B eing: Scotus a n d Scotists, w
: J. J. E
.G
arcia(red
.)
1992.
E ld er s L
. J.
1
9
9
3
»The M etaphysics o f B ein g in T h o m a s A qu in as. A H isto rica l P e r
spective, L
eid
en
.
Fa bro C
.
1
966, The T ran scen d en tality o fE n s -E s s e a n d the G rou n d o f M etap h y sics,
„In
tern
atio
n
al P
h
ilo
so
p
h
ical Q
u
arterly
”6, s. 389-427.
F e l l e r m e ie r J.
1971-1972, W ahrheit un d E xisten z b ei H eid eg g er un d T h om as von A qu in ,
„S
alzb
u
rg
erJah
rb
u
chfü
rP
h
ilo
so
p
h
ie”15-16, s. 39-70.
F ic h t e J. G
.
1996,
T eo ria w iedzy. W y bör p is m , t. 1
,p
rzeLM
. J. Siem
ek
,W
arszaw
a.
F o d o r J.
1975, T he L a n g u a g e o f T hought, N
ew
Y
o
rk
.
1981, R ep resen ta tio n s ,C
am
b
rid
g
e, M
A
.
1990, A T h eory o f C o n ten t a n d O th er E ssays, C
am
b
rid
g
e, M
A
.
1998, C on cepts. W h ere C og n itiv e S cien ce W ent Wrong?, O
xfo
rd
.
F o d o r J. A
., L e P o re E
.
1992, H olism : A S h o p p er s* G u id e, O
xfo
rd
.
318
BIBLIOGRAFIA
Frank W
.A
.
1
9
9
5
»Duns Scotus, M etaphysician, In
d
ia
n
a
p
o
lis.
Frege G.
1977,
Pism a sem antyczne, p
rz
el.B
.W
o
ln
iew
icz
,W
a
rsz
a
w
a
.
F riedlander P
.
1993, A letheia, „
P
rin
cip
ia
”V
II, s. 105-115.
Galecki J.
1964, Istota istnienia , w
: Szkice filozoficzn e R om anow i Ingardenow i
w darze, K
ra
k
o
w
-W
a
rsz
a
w
a
.
G each RT
.
1969, Form an d Existence ,w
:A
.K
en
n
y(red
.) 1969, s. 29-53.
G ill M. L.
1989, Aristotle on Substances: the P aradox o f Unity, P
rin
ceto
n
.
G ilson E
.
1952,Jean Duns S cot Introduction a ses positions fundam entals, P
a
ris.
1
9
52a,B eing a n d S om e Philosophers, T
o
ro
n
to
.
i960, Tom izm , p
rz
el. J.R
y
b
a
lt,W
a
rsz
a
w
a
.
1963, Byt i istota ,p
rz
el. P
.L
u
b
icziJ. N
o
w
a
k
,W
a
rsz
a
w
a
.
1968, R ealizm tomistyczny, p
rz
e
k
la
dz
b
io
ro
w
y
,W
a
rsz
a
w
a
.
1987, H istoria filoz ofii chrzescijahskiej w w iekach srednich ,p
rz
e
l. S
.Z
a
le
w
sk
i,W
a
rsz
a
w
a
.
G oldman A
.
1986, Epistem ology an d the Cognition, C
a
m
b
rid
g
e, M
A
.
G ondek M. J.
1999, P oznanie bytu a transcendentalia ,w
:D
V1999, s. 185-200.
G racia J. J. E
.
1992, The Transcendentals in the M iddle Ages, n
u
m
ersp
ecja
ln
y„T
o
p
o
f
1
1
, s. 111-195.
1992a, T he T ran scen d en tals in th e M id d le Ages: An In tro d u ctio n ,
w
: J. J. E
.G
racia1992, s. 113-120.
1
9
9
2
b
, Scotuss C onception o f M etaphysics: The Study o f the Transcen
dentals, w
: J.J.E
.G
ra
cia(red
.) 1992, s. 153-168.
1992c, Suarez a n d the D octrine o f the Transcendentals ,w
: J. J.E
.G
racia
(red
.) 1992, s. 121-133.
1
9
9
8
, The O ntological Status o f The Transcendental Attributes o f Being,
w
: J.A
,A
ertsen(red
.) 1998, s. 213-225.
G robler A
.
2000, P raw da a w zglfdnosc, K
ra
k
o
w
.
G rodek K
.W
.
2003, R ozum ienie eon i noein u P arm en id esa ,K
ra
k
o
w
.
BI BLI OGRAFI A
319
G umanski L
.
1990, W p row ad z en ie w logikg w sp ólczesn q ,W
a
rsz
a
w
a
.
G u th rie W. K. C.
1962-1969,A H istory o f G reek P hilosophy, 1.1-5(zw
laszczat. 2
: The P resocratic Tradition fr o m P arm en id es to D em ocritu s ),C
am
b
rid
g
e.
H afemann B.
1998, A ristoteles ’tran szen d en taler R ealism u s: In h a lt u n d U m fan g erster
P rin zipien in d e r M etap h y sik ,Berlin-New York.
H ajduk Z.
2000, O gólna m eto d o lo g ía n a u k ,L
u
b
lin
.
H alper E
.
1985, A ristotle on th e C on vertibility o f O ne a n d B ein g , „
T
h
eN
ewSch
o
lasticism
”59, s. 213-227.
H arman G
.
1972, T h o u g h t P
rin
ceto
n
,N
J.
H a rris C. R. S.
1959, D uns ScotuSy 1.1-2, N
ew
Y
o
rk
.
H artman J.
1996, H eu ry sty ka filo z o fic z n a ,W
ro
claw
.
1997,P ro b le m a ty k a istn ien ia - r e k a p itu la c ja ,„K
w
artaln
ikF
ilo
zo
ficzn
y
”
1
, s. 195-208.
2000, (red
.), L o g ik a ifilo z o fia . W
strong Ja n a WolenskiegOy K
rak
o
w
.
2001, T echn iki m etafilozofiiy K
ra
k
o
w
.
H e g e l G . W. F.
1963, F e n o m en o lo g ia d u c h a y p
rzei. A
.L
an
d
m
an
,W
arszaw
a.
1967/
1968, N a u k a logikiy p
rzeLA
.L
an
d
m
an
,W
a
rsz
a
w
a
.
1990, E n c y k lo p ed ia n a u k filo zo ficzn y ch y p
rz
eLS
.F
.N
o
w
ick
i, W
arszaw
a.
1998, W y klad y z h istorii filozofiiy t. 1-2, p
rzeLS
.F
.N
o
w
ick
i, W
arszaw
a.
H e id e g g e r
M.
1979(w
razzE
.F
in
k
), H eraclitu s Seminary 1966/
1967, A
lab
am
a.
1994, B y cie i c z a s ,p
rz
eLB
.B
aran
,W
arszaw
a.
1999, Z n a k i d ro g i ,p
rzek
iadzb
io
ro
w
y
,W
a
rszaw
a.
1999a, C z y m je s t m e ta fiz y k a ?
,w
:M
.H
eid
eg
g
er1999, s. 95-112.
1999b
, Oisto cie p r a w d y y w
:M
.H
eid
eg
g
er1999, s. 157-178.
1999c, D rog i lasuy p
rzek
ladzb
io
ro
w
y
,W
arszaw
a.
2000, W p ro w a d z en ie d o m etafizykiy p
rz
eLR
.M
arszalek
,W
arszaw
a.
H in t ik k a J.
1986, (red
.), T he L o g ic ofB ein g y D
o
rd
rech
t.
1986a, T h e V arietes o f B e in g in A ristotle ,w
: J. H
in
tik
k
a(red
.) 1986.
320
BIBLIOGRAFIA
H oenes M
.
19
6
8
, Ens et Bonum Convertuntur: Eine D eutung des scholastischen
A xiom s unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der M etaphysik und der Ethik
des hl. Thomas von Aquin, B
a
m
b
erg
.
H ofstadter A
.
19
6
5
,
Truth o f Being, „
Jo
u
rn
a
lo
fP
h
ilo
so
p
h
y
”7
, s. 167-183.
H onnefelder L
1
9
8
9
,Ens inquantum ens. D er B egriff des Seinenden als solchen als Gegen
stand der M etaphysik nach der Lehre des Johannes Duns Scotus, M
ü
n
ste
r.
19
9
0
, Scientia transcendens. Die fo r m a le Bestim m ung der Seiendheit
und R ealität in der M etaphysik des M ittelalters und der Neuzeit (Duns
Scotus - Suarez - Wo f f - Kant - Peirce), H
a
m
b
u
rg
.
19
9
2
, Transzendenz. Zu einem Grundwort d er klassischen Metaphysik,
P
a
d
erb
o
rn
.
Husserl E
.
19
6
7
, Id ee czystej fen om en olog ii i fen om en ologiczn ej filozofii l, p
rz
e
l.
D
. G
ieru
la
n
k
a
,W
a
rsz
a
w
a
.
1982, M edytacje kartezjahskie, p
rz
e
l. A
.W
a
js,W
a
rsz
a
w
a
.
19
8
7
, Kryzys nauk europejskich ifen om en olog ia transcendentalna, p
rz
e
l.
S
. W
a
lcz
e
w
sk
a
,K
ra
k
o
w
.
2000-2001, B ad an ia logiczne J-/
I; p
rz
e
l. J. S
id
o
rek
,W
a
rsz
a
w
a
.
Hussey E
.
19
7
2
, The Presocratics, L
o
n
d
o
n
.
Ingarden R.
19
7
2
, O pytan iach esencjalnych, w
: id
em
, Z teorii j^zyka i filozoficznych
podstaw logiki, W
a
rsz
a
w
a
,s. 327-482.
19
8
7
, Spor 0 istnienie swiata, 1.1-3, W
a
rsz
a
w
a
.
Jackendoff R
.
1987, Consciousness an d Com putation, C
a
m
b
rid
g
e, M
A
.
Jordan M
.D
.
1980, The G ram m ar o f “Esse”: R e-reading Thom as on the Transcendentals ,„
T
h
eT
h
o
m
ist”44, s. 1-26.
K ahn C h .
19
7
3
, The Verb “to B e” in Ancient Greek, D
o
rd
rech
t-B
o
sto
n
.
2008,J$zyk i ontologia, p
rz
el. ip
o
slo
w
iem
o
p
a
trz
y
lB
.Z
u
k
o
w
sk
i, K
^
ty
.
K
a
m
in
sk
iS
.
1
9
6
3
, Czym sq w filozofii tzw. pierw sze zasady, „
R
o
cz
n
ik
iF
ilo
z
o
ficz
n
e
”1
,
s. 5-23.
K
a
n
tI.
1964, Krytyka w ladzy sqdzen ia ,p
rz
el. J. G
aleck
i, W
a
rsz
a
w
a
.
BI BLI OGRAFI A
321
1972, K rytyka p rakty czn eg o rozu m u ,p
rzeLJ. G
aieck
i, W
arszaw
a.
1986, K rytyka czystego ro zu m u y1.1-2, p
rz
eLR
. In
g
ard
en
,W
arszaw
a.
1993, P roleg om en a d o w szelkiej p rz y sz lej m etafizy ki, k to r a b $ d z ie m o g la
wystqpic ja k o n a u k a ,p
rz
et. B
.B
o
rn
stein
,W
a
rsz
a
w
a
.
1999, P ism a p rz ed k ry ty czn e, red
.n
au
k
.M
.Z
ela
z
n
y
,T
o
ru
ri.
K atz J.
1971, The U nderlying R eality o f L a n g u a g e a n d Its P h ilo s o p h ic a l Im p o r t ,
N
ew
Y
o
rk
.
1972, S em an tic T heory ,N
ew
Y
o
rk
.
K eil F.
1989, ConceptSy K in ds, a n d C ognitive D evelopm enty C
am
b
rid
g
e, M
A
.
K enny A
.
1969, (red
.),A q u in a s .A C ollection o f C ritical E ssaysy L
o
n
d
o
n
.
1989, The M etaphysics o f Mindy O
xfo
rd
.
1993, A q u in a s on M in d ,O
xfo
rd
.
K ielbasa J.
2011, T ran scen den taln y i n ietran scen d en taln y sens je d n o s c i w m y s liX III
w ieku n a tie filo z o fic z n e j tradycjiy K
ra
k
o
w
.
K ilijan ek M.
2000, K ant. S a m o s w ia d o m o sc ip o z n a n ie dysku rsy w n e ,P
o
zn
an
.
K n it te r m e y e r H.
1920, D er T erm inus “tra n sz en d en ta l” in se in er historisch en E n tw icklu n g
bis zu Kanty M
arb
u
rg
.
K o lo d z iejc z yk S. T.
2003, M etafizy cz n e p o d sta w y w ied z y w sw ietle klasy czn ej teo rii transcendentalioW y „
K
w
artaln
ikF
ilo
zo
ficzn
y
”3, s. 5-32.
2003a, T ran scen d en talia - k o n c e p c je sred n io w iecz n e i in terp retacje
w spolczesney w
:W
.S
tro
zew
sk
i, O n tolog ia. Z ary s p roblem aty kiy K
rak
o
w
,
s. 202-206.
2005, T ran scen d en tals a n d th e B asic F u rn itu re o f M in d HypothesiSy „Fo
ru
mP
h
ilo
so
p
h
icu
m
”10, s. 57-69.
K o ta rbin sk i T
.
1986, E lem en ty teo rii p o z n a n ia , log iki fo r m a ln e j i m eto d o lo g ii n a u k ,
W
a
rsz
a
w
a
.
K ow alczyk S.
1962,P ro b a opisu je d n o s c i transcendentalnejy „R
o
czn
ik
iF
ilo
zo
ficzn
e”10,
s. 119-134.
K r ^ piec M. A.
1959/
1993, T eoria a n a lo g ii bytu, L
u
b
lin
.
BIBLIOGRAFIA
322
1
9
64/
1999, Transcendentalia i uniw ersalia ,„R
o
czn
ik
iF
ilo
z
o
ficz
n
e”1
2
,
s. 17-26.
1978, M etafizyka. Zarys teorii bytu ,L
u
b
lin
.
K retzman N., Kenny A., P inborg J.
1982, (red
.), The C am bridge History o f L a ter M edieval Philosophy From
the R ediscovery o f Aristotle to the D isintegration o f Scholasticism 1100-1 6 0 0 ,C
a
m
b
rid
g
e.
1993,
(red
.), The C am bridge C om panion to A qu inas ,C
a
m
b
rid
g
e.
Kubok W.
2004, P raw da i m niem anie. Studium filo z o fii P arm enidesa z E le i , K
ato
w
ice
.
Kurylewicz G.
1999, K om en tarz d o kwestii i s , 16 i 17 Sum m y teologii , w
:T
o
m
a
sz
zA
k
w
in
u1999, s. 681-720.
L ibera D e A.
1990,A lbert le G rand et la philosophie ,P
a
ris.
L iddell H. G., Sco tt R.
1990,A Greek-English L exicon ,O
x
fo
rd
.
Loux M. J.
1
9
7
6
, U niversal an d Particulars: Readings in Ontology N
o
treD
a
m
e
, In
d
.-L
o
n
d
o
n
.
1992, A ristotle on the T ra n sc en d en ta l „
T
h
eR
ev
iewofM
eta
p
h
y
sics”
,
s. 225-239.
i9
9
4
Significatio a n d Suppositio: R eflections on O ckham s Sem antics ,
„
T
h
eR
ev
iew
ofM
eta
p
h
y
sics”
,s. 407-427.
1999, M etaphysics: An Introduction ,L
o
n
d
o
n
.
Lycan W. G.
1990, (red
.),M ind an d C ognition ,O
x
fo
rd
.
L agosz M
.
2000, Z n aczenie i p raw d a: rozw azan ia 0 Fregow skiej sem antyce z d a h ,
W
ro
cla
w
.
Lukasiewicz J.
1910
/
1
9
8
7
,O
z asa d zie niesprzecznosci u A rystotelesa, W
a
rsz
a
w
a
.
M acD onald S.
1991, (red
.), Being a n d G oodness ,Ith
aca-L
o
n
d
o
n
.
1993, Theory o f K now ledge, w
:N
.K
retzm
an
n(red
.) 1
9
9
3
.
M ajdanski S.
1
9
6
2
,O
naturze logicznej transcendentaliow , „
R
o
cz
n
ik
iF
ilo
z
o
ficz
n
e”1
0
,
s. 41-85-
BI BL I OGR AF I A
323
2000, M etafizy ka klasyczn a: T ra n scen d en talia , k o n w er tib ilia i red u p likatyw y ( refleksje m etam etafizyczn e ), „
S
tu
d
iaP
h
ilo
so
p
h
iaeC
h
ristian
ae”2
,
s. 157-180.
M arcel G
.
1995, T ajem n ica bytu ,p
rzel. M
.F
ran
k
iew
icz, K
rak
o
w
.
M argolis E.
1998, H
o
w
to A qu ire the C o n cep t , „
M
in
dan
dL
an
g
u
ag
e”13.
M a rgo lis E., L aurence S.
1999, C oncepts. C ore R ea d in g s, C
am
b
rid
g
e, M
A
-L
on
d
on
.
2003, C on cep ts ,w
: StichS
.P
.,W
arfieldT
.A
. (red
.), The B la c k w ell G u id e
to P h ilosop h y o f M in d, O
xfo
rd
.
M a rita in J.
1962, AP refa ce to M etaphysics. S ev en L ectures on B eing, N
ewY
o
rk
.
1
988, P is m a filo z o fic z n e , p
rzel. J. F
en
ry
ch
o
w
a, K
ra
k
o
w
.
M artin C h .
1988, (red
.), T he P h ilosop h y o f T h om as A q u in a s: In trod u cto ry R ea d in g s,
L
o
n
d
o
n
.
M a ryn ia rczyk A
.
1985, M e to d a sep a ra cji a m eta fiz y k a . Z w iq z ek fo r m o w a n ia p o jg c ia bytu
z d e te rm in a c jq p rz ed m io tu m eta fiz y k i, L
u
b
lin
.
Veritas seq u itu r esse , tek
st zam
ieszczo
n
ywIn
tern
ecie: h
ttp
:/
/
w
w
w
.v
a
xx
in
e.co
m
/
h
y
o
o
m
ik
/
lu
b
lin
/
v
eritas.h
tm
l
1991-1992, T ran scen d en talia a p o z n a n i e m eta fiz y cz n e, „R
oczn
ik
i Filo
zo
ficzn
e”39-40, s. 305-322.
1995, T ran scen d en talia w p er sp e k ty w ie h istory czn ej, „R
o
czn
ik
i Filozo
ficzn
e”1
, s. 139-164.
M ascall E. L.
1961, Istn ien ie i a n a lo g ia , p
rzel. J. W
.Z
ielin
sk
a, W
a
rszaw
a.
M c C a b e FI.
1969, C a teg o ries, w
:A
.K
en
n
y(red
.) 1969, s. 54-92.
M c C all R. J.
1930, S t T h om as on O n tolog ical Truth, „
T
h
eN
ewSch
o
lasticism
”12,
s. 9-29.
M c D o w ell J.
1994, M in d a n d W orld, C
am
b
rid
g
e, M
A
-L
on
d
on
.
M c I n ern y R.
1961, L o g ic o f A nalogy. A n In terp retation o f St. T hom as, T
h
eF
ia
g
u
e.
1986, B ein g a n d P redication : T hom istic In terp retation s ,W
ash
in
g
to
n
,D
.C
.
M ed in D
.
1989, C o n cep ts a n d C o n c ep tu a l S tru ctu re , „A
m
ericanP
sy
ch
o
lo
g
ist”44.
324
BIBLIOGRAFIA
M edin D
., O rtony A.
1989, Psychological Essentialism , w
:S
.V
o
sn
ia
d
o
u
,A
.O
rto
n
y(red
.),
Sim ilarity an d A nalogical Reasoning ,N
e
w
Y
o
rk
.
M ichalski K onstanty
1926, O drodzenie nom inalizm u w X IV w ieku , „
K
w
a
rta
ln
ikF
ilo
z
o
ficz
n
y
”4
,s. 171-216; 477-496.
M ichalski K rzysztof
2000,H eidegger ifiloz ofia w spolczesna ,W
a
rsz
a
w
a
.
M iller B
.
Existence ,h
a
slow
: Stanfords Encyclopedia o f Philosophy, u
d
o
st^
p
n
io
n
e
wIn
tern
eciep
o
da
d
re
se
m
:h
ttp
:/
/
p
la
to
.sta
n
fo
rd
.e
d
u
/
e
n
trie
s/
e
x
iste
n
ce
1986-1987, E
x
istsa
n
dExistence , „
R
e
v
ie
w
ofM
e
ta
p
h
y
sics”4
0
, s. 237-270.
M oore G
,E
.
1959, Is Existence a Predicate ?
,w
: P hilosophical Papers , L
o
n
d
o
n
-N
ew
Y
o
rk
.
1
9
6
7
,Zglow nych zagadniehfilozofi /
,p
rz
e
l.C
z
.Z
n
a
m
ie
ro
w
sk
i,W
a
rsz
a
w
a
.
M orawiec E.
1998, Podstaw ow e zagadnienia m etafizyki klasy czn ef W
a
rsz
a
w
a
.
M oser R
1989, K now ledge an d Evidence ,C
a
m
b
rid
g
e.
M ourelatos A
. I. R
1970, 7fteR
o
u
teo f Parm enides: A Study o f Word, Im age ,and Arguments
in the Fragm ents ,N
e
w
H
av
en
-L
o
n
d
o
n
.
M rowka K
.
2004, H eraklit ,W
a
rsz
a
w
a
.
M urphy G
., M edin D
.
1985, 77ieR
o
/
e0
/Theories in C onceptual C oherence , „
P
sy
ch
o
lo
g
ica
l
R
ev
iew
”3
.
N eisser V
.
1987,
(red
.), Concepts an d C onceptual D evelopm ent ,C
a
m
b
rid
g
e
.
Norreklit L.
1973, C oncepts . Their Nature an d Significance f o r M etaphysics a n d Epi
stem ology ,O
d
en
se.
N owaczyk A.
2004,
C
z
jyistnienie jest predykatem ?, „
K
w
a
rta
ln
ikF
ilo
zo
fk
zn
y
”1
.
N owak L.
1998,R
y
fi my si, P
o
z
n
a
n
.
N owik A
.M
., M uszynska R
.A
., D udzik G
.P
.
1996, O
duszy. A rystoteles i sw. Tomasz, W
a
rsz
a
w
a
.
BI BL I OGR AF I A
325
O'R ourke R A.
1992, P seudo-D ionysius a n d the M etap h y sics o f A qu in as, L
eid
en
.
O wens J.
1963, The D octrin e o f B i n g in the A ristotelian M etap h y sics . AStudy in
the G reek B ackg rou n d o f M ed iev a l Thought, T
o
ro
n
to
.
Palm er A
.
1988, C on cep t a n d O bject, L
on
d
on
-N
ewY
o
rk
.
Papineau D
.
1987, R eality a n d R ep resen tation ,O
xfo
rd
.
Parsons T.
1980, N on existen t O bjects, N
ew
H
av
en
.
Pasn iczek J.
1992, T heories o f O bjects: M ein o n g a n d T w ard ow ski , L
u
b
lin
.
P ea co cke C h .
1986, T houghts: A n E ssay on C on ten t, O
xfo
rd
.
1992/
1995, AStudy o f C on cepts, C
am
b
rid
g
e, M
A
.
1998, N on con cep tu al C on ten t D efen d ed , „P
h
ilo
so
p
h
yan
dP
h
en
om
en
o
lo
g
icalR
esearch
”2
.
1999, B ein g kn ow n , Oxford.
2000, T heories o f C on cepts: A W id er Task, „E
u
ro
p
eanJo
u
rn
al ofP
h
ilo
so
p
h
y
”
,s. 298-321.
P ea rs D.
1967, Is E x isten ce a P red ic a te?, w
:P
. RS
traw
so
n1967, s. 97-102.
P erza n o w sk i J.
1988, B yt, „S
tu
d
iaF
ilo
zo
ficzn
e”6-7, s. 63-85.
1988a, O n tolog ie i o n tolo g ik i, „S
tu
d
iaF
ilo
zo
ficzn
e”6-7, s. 87-99.
P h elan P. B.
1
9
3
9
»V erum sequ itu r esse reru m , „M
ed
iaev
al S
tu
d
ies”1
, s. 11-22.
P la n tin g a A.
1993, W arran t a n d P ro p er F u n ction , O
xfo
rd
.
1993a, W arran t: The C u rren t D eb a te, O
xfo
rd
.
P o d b ie l s k i M
.
1999, T eo ría tra n scen d en ta lió w w I K w estii D e V eritate sw. T om asza
z A k w in u ,w
:D
V1999, s. 227-242.
P o u illo n H.
1939, L e p r e m ir traité des p ro p riété s tran scen d en tales. L a S u m m a d e
b o n o du C h a n celier P h ilip p e , „
R
ev
u
eN
éo
sco
lastiq
u
ed
eP
h
ilo
so
p
h
ic”42,
s. 40-77.
326
BIBLIOGRAFIA
Preller V.
1967,D ivine Science an d the Science o f God, A Reform ulation o f Thomas
AquinaSy P
rin
ceto
n
-N
ew
Je
rse
y
.
P utnam H.
1998, W iele twarzy realizm u i inné eseje, p
rz
el. A
.G
ro
b
ler,W
a
rsz
a
w
a
.
Q uine W
.V
. O.
1997,N a tropach prawdyy p
rz
e
l. B
.S
ta
n
o
sz
,W
a
rsz
a
w
a
.
1999, Slow o iprzedm ioty p
rz
e
l. B
.S
ta
n
o
sz
,W
a
rsz
a
w
a
.
2000, Z punktu w idzenia logikiy p
rz
e
l. B
.S
ta
n
o
sz
,W
a
rsz
a
w
a
.
200
0
a
, Otym, co istniejey w
:W
.V
.O
.Q
u
in
e200
0
.
2
000b
, D w a dogm aty em piryzmu, w
:W
.V
.O
.Q
u
in
e2000.
R amsey R P
.
1990,
R R R am sey: Philosophical Papersy re
d
.D
.H
.M
ello
r,C
a
m
b
rid
g
e
.
Reale G
.
1979, The C oncept o f First Philosophy an d the Unity o f Metaphysics o f
Aristotle ,p
rz
el. J. R
.C
a
ta
n
,N
e
w
Y
o
rk
.
1993-2000,H istoriafilozofii $tarozytnejyt.1-4,p
rz
e
l.E
.I.Z
ie
lin
sk
i,L
u
b
lin
.
R eith H.
1962, The M etaphysics o f St. Thomas A quinas ,M
ilw
a
u
k
ee.
R ey G.
1994, C oncepts ,w
:S
.G
u
tten
p
la
n(red
.),AC om panion to the Philosophy
o f Mindy C
a
m
b
rid
g
e, M
A
.
R ijk L
.M
.
1982, The Origins o f The Theory o f the Properties o fT erm syw
:N
.K
re
tz
m
a
n
n(red
.) 1982, s. 161-173.
R
iou
xB
.
1963,l i t r e et la vérité chez Heidegger et St. Thom as dA quinyM
o
n
tréa
l-P
aris.
Rosch E
.
1
9
7
3
On the Internal Structure o f Perceptual an d Sem antic Categories,
w
:T
.E
.M
o
o
re(red
.), Cognitive Development an d Acquisition ofLanguagey
N
e
w
Y
o
rk
.
1978, Principles o f C ategorization, w
:E
.R
o
sch
,E
.L
lo
y
d(red
.), Cogni
tion an d C ategorization ,H
illsd
ale-N
ew
Y
o
rk
.
Rosch E
., M ervis C
.
1975, Fam ily R esam blances: Studies in the Internal Structure ofC ateg oriesy „
C
o
g
n
itiv
eP
sy
ch
o
lo
g
y
”8
.
R osemann W.
1998, A liquid: Ein vergessenes Transzendentale , w
: J. A
.A
ertsen(re
d
.)
1998, s. 529-537.
B I B L I OG R A F I A
327
R
o
ssW
.D
.
1951, P la tos T h e o ry o f Id e a s , O
x
fo
rd
.
1972, A ris to tle , L
o
n
d
o
n
.
Russell B.
1906-1907, O n th e N a t u r e o f T r u t h , „P
ro
ceed
in
g
s ofth
eA
risto
telian
S
o
ciety
”7, s. 208-249.
1940, A n I n q u ir y into M e a n i n g a n d T r u t h , L
o
n
d
o
n
.
1967, D e n o t o w a n ie , w
: J. P
elc(red
.), L o g ik a ijg z y k , W
arszaw
a.
Rygalski A
.
2005, P o jg cie a p r z e d m i o t w e d lu g F r e g e g o , „K
w
artaln
ikF
ilo
zo
ficzn
y
”
,
XXXIII (1).
Ryle G.
1971,
C o lle c te d P a p e rs , t. 2
,L
o
n
d
o
n
.
Salam ucha
1997,
J.
W ie d z a i w ia ra : w y b r a n e p i s m a filo z o fic z n e ,
1997a, Om o z liw o sci scisleg o s fo r m a liz o w a n ia
nych, w
: J. S
alam
u
ch
a1997, s. 218-225.
L
u
b
lin
.
d z i e d z i n y p o j g c a n a lo g ic z -
S c h m id t R. W.
1966,
T h e D o m a in o f L o g ic A c c o r d in g to S t T h o m a s A q u i n a s , T
h
eH
a
g
u
e.
SC H U LEM A N N
1929, D i e
G.
L e h r e v o n d e n T r a n s z e n d e n t a lie n in d e r s c h o la s tis c h e n P h ilo
Leipzig.
M
. J.
sophies
Sie m e k
1977, I d e a t r a n s c e n d e n t a liz m u u F ic h te g o i K a n t a , W
arszaw
a.
Sm ith E., M ed in D.
1981, C o n c e p t s
a n d C a te g o r ie s , Cambridge,
MA.
Spade P. V.
1982, T h e S e m a n t ic s o f T e r m s , w
:N
.K
retzm
an
n(red
.) 1982, s. 188-196.
1994, F iv e
Staln a ker R.
T exts o n th e M e d i a e v a l P r o b le m o f U n iv ersa ls,
Indianapolis.
1984, I n q u i r y , C
am
b
rid
g
e, M
A
.
St e in E.
1995, B y t s k o h c z o n y
Stew a rt J. A.
a b y t w ie c z n y , przel.
I. J. Adamska, Poznan.
1909, P la to s D o c t r i n e o f I d e a s , O
xfo
rd
.
St ^pie n A
.B
.
1964, W p r o w a d z e n ie d o m e ta fiz y k i, K
rak
o
w
.
1966, Om e t o d z i e teo rii p o z n a n i a : r o z w a z a n ia w stg p n e, L
u
b
lin
.
1974, R o la d o s w ia d c z e n ia w p u n k c i e w y jscia m e ta fiz y k i, „Z
eszy
ty
N
au
k
o
w
eK
U
L
”4, s. 29-37.
328
BIBLIOGRAFIA
Stout G. R
19
7
1
, The N ature o f Universals an d Propositions , w
:C
,L
a
n
d
e
sm
a
n
(red
.), The P roblem o f U n iv ersa l N
e
w
Y
o
rk
.
Strawson R R
19
6
6
, The Bounds o f Sense. An Essay on K ants “Critique o f Pure Reason\
L
o
n
d
o
n
.
1967, (red
.), P hilosophical Logic ,O
x
fo
rd
.
1980, Indyw idua. P röba m etafizyki opisowej p
rz
e
LB
.C
h
w
e
d
e
ricz
u
k
,
W
a
rsz
a
w
a
.
Strözewski W
.
1981, Istnienie i w ar to sc, K
ra
k
o
w
.
1983, D ialektyka tworczosci, W
a
rsz
a
w
a
.
1992, W yklady 0 P latonic: ontologia ,K
ra
k
o
w
.
1994, Istnienie i sens ,K
ra
k
o
w
.
19
9
6
,O
sposobach istnienia
w
: J. A
. Ja
n
ik(red
.), N auka, religia , dzieje.
Co znaczy realnie bye.? VIII Sem inarium Interdyscyplinarne w Castel
G andolfo , 8 -1 0 sierpnia 1
9
9
5
,K
ra
k
o
w
, s. 81-101.
19
9
7
, Istnienie i p ra w d a ,„
R
o
cz
n
ik
iP
A
U
”
,s. 129-146.
2000, N egacja transcendentalna ,w
: J.H
a
rtm
a
n2000, s. 107-114.
2003, Ontologia. Zarys problem atyki, K
ra
k
o
w
.
Swiezawski S.
1948, Byt. Z agadn ienia m etafizyki tom istyeznej ,L
u
b
lin
.
1993, Istnienie i tajem n ica ,L
u
b
lin
.
2000, D zieje europejskiej filozofii klasycznej ,W
ro
cla
w
-W
a
rsz
a
w
a
.
Szlezäk T.
19
9
5
, Czytanie P laton a ,p
rz
el.S
.B
la
n
d
z
i, W
a
rsz
a
w
a
.
SZUBKA T.
1996, (red
.),M etafizyka w filozofii analitycznej ,L
u
b
lin
.
2001,Antyrealizm semantyezny. Studium analityczne ,L
u
b
lin
.
S zymura J.
1982, Jfzyk, m ow a i praw d a w perspektyw ie fen om en olog ii lingwistycznej J. L. A ustina ,Krakow.
1
9
9
0
,Relacje w perspektyw ie absolutnego monizmu E H. Bradleya ,K
ra
k
o
w
.
Tarän L
.
1965, Parm enides. A Text with Translation , C om m entary and Critical
Essays ,Princeton.
Tarski A
.
19
9
5
, P ism a logiezno-filozofiezne ,t. 1
,W
a
rsz
a
w
a
.
B I BL I O G R AF I A
329
Tavuzzi M
.
1987, A q u in a s on the P relim in a ry G rasp o f B ein g, „
T
h
eT
h
om
ist”51,
s. 55 5 -5 7 4 .
Taylor A
.E
.
1926, P lato. A M an a n d H is W ork ,L
o
n
d
o
n
.
T isch n er J.
1964, C zym je s t , J a ”tra n s cen d en ta ln e ?
,w
: S z k ic e filo z o fic z n e R o m a n o w i
In g a rd en o w i w d a r z e ,s. 349-364.
1982, M yslen ie w ed iu g w a rto sci , K
rak
o
w
.
T ugendhat E
.
1999,
Bycie. P r a w d a .R o zp raw y filo z o fic z n e , przel. J. Sidorek, Warszawa.
T ulloch D
.M
.
1975, T he L og ic o f P ositive Term s a n d th e T ra n scen d en ta l N o tio n o f
B ein g , „
M
in
d
”66, s. 351-362.
1958, O n to lo g ica l G o o d n es s , „
T
h
eP
h
ilosop
h
ical Q
u
arterly
”8, s. 317-327.
T v er sk y A
.
1977, F eatu res o f S im ila rity , „P
sy
ch
o
lo
g
ical R
ev
iew
”4.
T w ardow ski K
.
1965, W y b r a n e p is m a filo z o fic z n e , W
arszaw
a.
V elde R
.A
.
1995,
P a rtic ip a tio n a n d S u b sta n tiality in T h om as A q u in a s , L
eid
en
.
V e n t im ig l ia G.
1998, D ie T ra n sz en d en ta lien leh re d es T h o m a s von A q u in , w
: J. A
.A
ertsen(red
.) 1998, s. 522-528.
V la sto s G.
!973 P la to n ic Stu dies, P
rin
ceton
.
Wa is K.
1926, O n tolog ia, czyli m e ta fiz y k a o g o ln a , L
w
o
w
.
W e ish e ip l J. A
.
1983, F r ia r T h o m a s d A q u in o , W
ash
in
g
to
n
,D
.C
.
W e it z M.
1988, T h eories o f C o n c ep ts , L
on
d
on
-N
ewY
o
rk
.
W h it c o m b Ph. W.
1981,
E x isten c e a n d E ssen ce in S ch o la stic M etap h y sics, K
an
sas.
W id o m sk i J.
1978, P r z e d m io t m e ta fiz y k i u J a n a D u n sa S zkota. P r o b a ro z g r a n icz en ia
z a g a d n ie h o n to lo g icz n y ch i m eta fiz y cz n y ch w o b r q b ie j ego filo z o fii, „
Stu
d
iaM
ed
iew
isty
czn
e”2, s. 49-73.
B I B L I O GR AF I A
330
1980, K o n cep cja istoty u Ja n a D u n sa Szkota i E d m u n d a H usserla. P roba
p o ro w n a n ia , „
S
tu
d
iaF
ilo
z
o
ficz
n
e”1
2
, s. 21-29.
W illiams C. J. F.
1976, W h a t is T ru th ?, C
a
m
b
rid
g
e.
1981, W h a t is E x is te n c e ?, O
x
fo
rd
.
1992,B ein g, Id en tity a n d T ru th , O
x
fo
rd
.
W illiams D. C.
1953,
O n the E lem e n ts o f B e in g I—
II „
T
h
eR
ev
iew
ofM
e
ta
p
h
y
sics”7
.
W ippel J. E
1984,M eta p h ysical T h em es in Thom as A q u in a s , W
a
sh
in
g
to
n
,D
.C
.
1987, Studies in M ed iev a l Philosophy , W
a
sh
in
g
to
n
,D
.C
.
1989-1990, T ruth in A q u in a s , „
T
h
eR
ev
iew
ofM
e
ta
p
h
y
sics”43, s. 295-326, 543-567.
W ittgenstein L
.
1972, D o ciek a n ia filo zo ficzn e, p
rz
e
l. B
.W
o
ln
iew
icz
,W
a
rsz
a
w
a
.
1997,
Tractatus logico-philosophicus , p
rz
el. B
.W
o
ln
iew
icz
,W
a
rsz
a
w
a
.
W ojtysiak J.
2001, S ta ro zy tn e p o czqtk i p ro blem a ty k i istn ien ia , „
K
w
a
rta
ln
ikF
ilo
z
o
ficz
n
y
”2
.
Wolenski J.
1985, F ilozo ficzn a szkola Iw ow sko-w arszaw ska, W
a
rsz
a
w
a
.
1989, K ieru n k i i m eto dy filozofii a n a lity czn ej , w
: J. P
e
rz
a
n
o
w
sk
i (red
.),
Ja k filo z o fo w a c ?, W
a
rsz
a
w
a
,s. 30-77.
1992, “B e in g ” as a S yncategorem atic W ord: A C om pletion (?) o f Twardow skis A nalysis o f “N o th in g”, w
: J.P
asn
icz
ek(red
.) 1
9
9
2
.
1993,M eta m a tem a ty k a a epistem ologia, W
a
rsz
a
w
a
.
1996, W strong logiki, K
ra
k
o
w
.
1
9
96a, „B y t” i b y t , w
: J.W
o
len
sk
i 1996, s. 109-125.
1
996b
, D w ie k o n cep cje tra n scend en ta liow , w
: J. W
o
len
sk
i1
9
9
6
, s. 147-159.
1997, (red
.), Filozofia logiki ,W
a
rsz
a
w
a
.
2004, G ra n ice n iew ia ry , K
ra
k
o
w
.
WOLTER A. B.
1946, T h e T ra n scen d en ta ls a n d T h eir F u n c tio n in the M etaphysics o f
D u n s Scotus,
NewYork.
W right C.
1983, F re g e s C o n cep tio n o f N u m b ers as O bjects, A
b
erd
een
.
Zabech F.
1966, U n iv e r s a l, T
h
eH
a
g
u
e
.
BIBLIOGRAFIA
331
Z adeh L.
1982, A Note on Prototype Theory and Fuzzy Sets , „Cognition” 12,
s. 291-297.
Z alta E.
1988, Intentional Logic and the Metaphysics of Intentionality , Cambridge,
MA.
Z dybicka Z. J.
1972, Partycypacja hytu , Lublin.
Z emach E. M.
1966, Three Modes o f Being, „Philosophical Studies” 15, s. 226-255.
1968, The T ra n scen d en ta l „Further Studies in Philosophy” 20, s. 138-162.
Z ielinski E. I.
1980, Nieskohczonosc bytu Bozego wfilozofii Jana D unsa Szkota , Lublin.
1988, Jednoznacznosc transcendentalna w metafizyce D unsa Szkota, Lu
blin.
ZlEMINSKA R.
2003, Eksternalizm we wspotczesnej epistemologii, Szczecin.
SUMMARY
Conceptual boundaries of metaphysics
In this book I am discussing the origin, nature and function of
concepts playing a key role in human cognitive and volitionary
activities, in traditional metaphysics called transcendentals (they
include: being, essence, unity, plurality, truth and goodness). Due to the
fact that we use them spontaneously, automatically, without deeper
thinking or reflection, they seem to us to be both transparent and
obvious.
Detailed historical and analytical research allowed to reconstruct
two dominating tendencies present within the classical philosophical
discourse.
So,
it appears that metaphysics, even in the least developed
form, has a few mutually non-reductable conceptual schemes. In the
1 Chapter I am presenting the way in which these schemes became
differentiated. The research area covered pre-Socratean theories
as well as Platonian and Aristotelian ones. In the last of the men
tioned ones the distinguishing of the boundary concepts scheme
(which included first of all being, truth, unity and goodness) became
a foundation of the mature form o f metaphysical speculation, the
subject correlate of which was so defined as to cover all forms of
being, irrespectively of genre-type classification.
Although the second tendency appeared already in Plato's
and Aristotles doctrines, it was only in the Middle Ages when
the thesis was formed that between boundary concepts there are
numerous relations of logical and semantic nature. The theories of
transcendentals, at first being an attempt to answer the question on
how to understand the co-presence of evil in the world and how to
reconcile this fact with the existence of the goodness of God, with
334
SUMMARY
time become an autonomous philosophical metatheoretical tool with
the help of which attempts to describe basic cognitive and volitional
practices were undertaken. In the 3 Chapter I am reconstructing
the development of the transcendentals doctrine, with special
attention paid to the concept by Thomas Aquinas. At the same time,
I am defending a thesis that transcendentals, mainly in Aquinas
concept, for the first time play slightly different heuristic function
than in the case of his predecessors; they are, generally speaking,
closely connected with the characteristics of the mind, secondly with
objectivistically-oriented considerations on the nature of things.
The considerations presented in Chapters 1 and 3 aim not only
at the reconstruction of a historical process of boundary concepts
scheme creation. Mostly, it is about the distinguishing of systematic
theses which could be the subject of a detailed analysis in the further
part of the book. Basic theses include: (1) boundary concepts scheme
is organised around the concept of being; (2) boundary concepts are
interconnected as a compact concept set, particular components of
which have the same or similar features; (3) boundary concepts in
their essence are not subject to standard characteristics related to
concepts (thus, I decided to replace the notion of “transcendentals”
slightly worn out by traditional metaphysics with the notion of
“boundary concepts”); (4) boundary concepts as parts of sentence
structures appear usually as the, second levels concepts and that
is the reason why they seem to be totally transparent, thus, not
functional; (5) boundary concepts play a mixed constitutive and
descriptive function; the constitutive function i.e. such function
which determines the relation to the world, forming beliefs on it and
making acts of judgement is dominant here; (6) due to the function
mentioned, the boundary concepts appear to be also transcendental
ones i.e. formally conditioning all cognitive processes.
A detailed and multi-aspects analysis of the concept of being
on the basis of different philosophical doctrines is presented in
Chapter 2. In this chapter I focus my attention on indicating that
the basic component of each theory of being is drawing attention
to the fact that the concept of being is the boundary of conceptual
reduction. This bears some consequences for the whole scope of
S UM MA R Y
335
considerations on the issue of boundary concepts. Firstly, it allows
to look at boundary concepts as fu n d a m e n t a l and u ltim a te , when we
speak about the decomposition process of the conceptual appara
tus we posses. Secondly, it presents boundary concepts as a durable,
necessary and the most stable conceptual structure. Its abatement,
change or omission is impossible. Thirdly, the understanding o f the
remaining concepts of the boundary concept scheme depends on the
understanding o f the concept o f being. The three above-mentioned
consequences appear to be especially interesting in the context o f so-called non-classical theories of being, which include analytical ones.
In spite of significant differences in the sphere o f theoretical
determinations related to the question on the nature o f being and its
concept, some stable and unchanging properties remain intact, thus,
the thesis on the conceptual unity within boundary concepts scheme
the research o f which I undertake in Chapter 4 becomes confirmed.
Relations between boundary concepts create a complicated network
of relationships, most of all o f logical and semantic nature. The most
primitive form of such relationship is co-extensionality expressed in
traditional metaphysics with the use o f the thesis on convertibility.
According to this thesis, boundary concepts have the same range but
they differ in contents. Another, more advanced form o f relationship
is co-existence in the processes o f apprehending the object, acts
of cognition; the presence of boundary concepts is, however, not
ascertained in any of particular acts of judgement, directly aimed
at an object, it is reflection which brings them out. This leads to the
most interesting form o f coexistence, namely relations formulating
a set o f second levels concepts.
Conclusions from Chapter 4 had a decisive effect on the
character o f Chapters 5 and 6. In the first one I am asking a question
on the nature o f boundary concepts, considering first o f all the
fact that the considerations so far revealed a kind o f dichotomy in
relation to the concepts we use. The point is that boundary concepts
are strongly differentiated f~om genre-type concepts (so-called
universals), as far as both logical features and functions played in
the process o f cognition are concerned. Taking into concern the
above, the consideration o f the nature o f boundary concepts seemed
336
S UMMARY
to be an urgent case. The discussion on the nature of concepts in
contemporary philosophy is very wide and multi-thread. Thus,
I decided to take the simplest, and, as I hope, the most effective step:
I discussed boundary concepts at the background o f a few key concept
theories, including the standard (classical) theory, the atomist theory
and the prototype theory. In each case boundary concepts did not
fulfil the determinants for concepts in given theories. In traditional
metaphysics it is sometimes said that boundary concepts are some,
hidden types o f judgements. In Chapter 5 I referred also to this
concept, claiming that it is not a very convincing solution, however,
it is not without some advantages, although one should rather say
that names m eaning boundary concepts are correlated with some
types o f judgements.
Chapter 5 was in fact a negation o f a typical way o f thinking
about boundary concepts as about p a r e x c e lle n c e concepts. As their
nature cannot be directly defined, it would be best to do it by taking
a close look at the roles they play. The last, 6 Chapter is devoted to
this issue. In philosophical tradition, especially o f Kantian origin
the concept o f category as “equipment” o f m ind played a significant
role. It is interesting that Kant was aware o f the fact that medieval
metaphysics used some type o f conceptual scheme (transcendentals)
which could be considered as such equipment o f mind, but, in his
opinion, it insisted that it is a set o f concepts describing an object as
it really is. K ants diagnosis is, unfortunately, wrong. It was Thomas
who accepted the theory, but he did not develop it fully; according to
this theory, boundary concepts are “as i f ” inborn seeds o f knowledge
(Latin ra tio n es s e m in a le s ). The expression “as i f ” used in this case
is to suggest that it is a comparison and not identification. These
two stands allowed me to bring forward the “basic furniture of
m inds hypothesis” explaining, by relating to the boundary concepts
scheme, basic facts from cognitive and volitionary life. Due to my
hypothesis the discussion in Chapter 6 is focused around three
possible interpretations o f boundary concepts: (1) as referring to
fundamental acts o f mind; (2) as referring to fundamental beliefs, and
(3) as referring to fundamental propositional functions. In all three
cases I try to dem onstrate that boundary concepts condition par-
SUMMARY
337
ticular acts of mind (that is why I call them functional acts in order
to underline their necessity and universality), formally determ ine
a set o f beliefs on the world and, finally, they are a structural and at
the same time indispensable basis o f all judgements.
And finally: Someone could ask a fully justified question: So what s
there for us if we more or less understood what boundary concepts
are and how they work within our mind? The answer goes without
saying. Analyses included in the book provide possible variants o f
escape from trivialisation, instrumentalisation and marginalisation
o f metaphysical issues. These analyses lead to the conclusion that
boundary concepts are the central conceptual scheme o f each area
o f philosophical thought, and, successively, of each area w hich is
a result o f knowledge-forming activities o f our mind.
INDEKS OSOBOWY
A
Ackrill John Lloyd 68
Aertsen Jan 119,124, 129,132,
139-140, 143-146,156, 216
Aetius 41
Ajdukiewicz Kazimierz 100-101,
106-108,111,113, 235
Albert Wielki (A. von Böllstein) sw.
119-120,125, 131,134-142,
148-149,163
Aleksander z Haies 119-120,125,
128-134,148-149
Allen Woody (wtasc. Allen Stewart
Königsberg) 231
Anscombe Gerturd Elizabeth 293-294
Anzelm z Aosty sw. 88-89
Arystoteles 31, 34, 36, 50, 53-54,
56, 58, 65-74, 76-80, 83, 88,
9 1-9 6 ,9 8 , 117-118, 124, 146,
152, 159, 1 6 1 ,1 6 4 , 1 7 1 , 183,
216, 218-219, 256, 288-289,
300
Augustyn (Aureliusz A.) sw. 129
Austin Scott 50
Awicenna (Ibn Sina) 22, 91, 129,
143, 156, 159
Ayer Alfred Jules 283
B
Bärthlein Karl 78
Bauman Peter 31
Berkeley George 283
Blandzi Seweryn 5 5
Bochehski Jôzef Maria 147
Bohner Philothetus 128
Bonawentura (wlasc. Johannes
Fidanza) sw. 143, 163
Borkowski Ludwik 291
Brentano Franz 50, 300
Brown Stephen F. 143
Brutus (Marcus Iunnius Brutus)
293
Burge Tyler 230
C
Cantor Georg 307
Carey Susan 241
Carnap Rudolf 233-234, 283
Cassam Quassim 31
Chudy Wojciech 185
Cross Richard 31,163
Czezowski Tadeusz Hipolit 83, 92,
197, 301
D
Dembiriski Bogdan 5 5
Descartes René (Kartezjusz) 188,
255, 283-286, 306
Diels Paul 43
Dilcher Roman 43-44
Diogenes Laertes 41
Dionizy Areopagita 85
Dodd Julian 294
Dominik (Domenigo Guzman) sw.
128
INDEKS OSOBOWY
340
Doyle John 143
Dretske Fred 210
Dummett Michael 18,100
Dumont Stephen 158, 162
E
Edgington Dorothy 31
Elders Leo 87-89,146
Eustratiusz z Nicei 139
F
Fink Eugen Geburt 43
Fodor Jerry 224, 247-248
Frank William 158
Frege Gottlob 101-103,109, m ,
201, 230, 257-258, 287, 292-295. 307
Friedländer Paul 61
G
Geach Peter Thomas 88, 102, 293-294
Gillespie Cecil 68
Gilson Etienne 84,164
Gracia Jorge 119,158
Grodek Kleofas 48, 50-51, 53
Guthrie William Keith Chambers
40, 42-43,48
H
Hajduk Zygmunt 231
Harris Charles Reginald Schiller 158
Hartman Jan 31, 89,177
Hayes 232
Hegel Georg Wilhelm Friedrich 17,
4 6 , 173
Heidegger Martin 43
Henryk z Gandawy 99, 165
Heraklit 36, 38-47. 49. 51. 53-54.
57. 65, 70, 92
Hezjod 34
Hintikka Jaakko 75,199
Honnefelder Ludger 158,160
Hume David 75, 97, 99,129, 235,
283, 301
Husserl Edmund 50, 227, 278-279,
281-282,286-287
Hussey Edward 42
I
Ingarden Roman 189
J
Jackendorff Ray 231
Juliusz Cezar (Gaius Iulius Caesar)
102, 293
K
Kahn Charles 75, 95,199
Kaminski Stanislaw 92, 94
Kanclerz Filip 119-129,131,134,
136,141-142,148-149.155 ,
167
Kant Immanuel 19, 27, 29, 37, 75,
82, 97, 99,101,173. 210, 235,
263-266
Karas Marcin 31
Keil Frank C. 232
Kenny Anthony 121,146, 269
Kilijanek Marek 265
Kirk Geoffrey Stephen 39-40, 42-43,48-49,51
Kolodziejczyk Sebastian Tomasz
119,157, 265
Kotarbiriski Tadeusz 218, 230-231
Kr^piec Mieczyslaw Albert 84, 92,
94, 180-182,184, 225, 227,
252-253
Kripke Saul Aaron 247
Kubok Wojciech 48, 50
I NDERS O S O B O W Y
L
Laurence Stephen 232, 234, 241
Legutko Ryszard 55—56
Lem Stanislaw 74
Lesniak Kazimierz 39, 41, 44
Lesniewski Stanislaw 100, 106
Libera Alain de 135
Liddell Henry George 51, 57, 61
Locke John 129, 232, 283
Loux Michael J. 76, 223
L
Lukasiewicz Jan 75,92,94,183, 300
M
MacDonald Scott Charles 135
Majdahski Stanislaw 180-181, 211
Margolis Erie 232, 234, 241
Maritain Jacques 86-87
Martin Christopher 146
Maryniarczyk Andrzej 84-85,93,252
McCabe Henry 215, 220
McDowell John 16, 263, 302
Medin Douglas 242-243
Meinong von Handschuchsheim
Alexius 103
Merwis Caloryl 237
Miller Barry 102-103
Morawiec Edmund 82, 85-86, 92- 93,96
Mourelatos Alexander 48
Mrowka Kazimierz 43
Murphy Gregory 242
N
Nowik Andrzej Marek 152
O
Ockham Wilhelm (wlasc. William
of Occam) 99
341
Ortony Andrew 242-243
P
Parmenides 35-36, 46-57, 60, 63,
65,80, 99, 173
Parsons Talcott 103
Peacocke Christopher 172, 231-232
Pears David 223
Piotr Lombard (Petrus Lombardus)
134 , 155
Plantinga Alvin 284, 288-289
Platon 36, 42, 50, 53-5**, 60-65,
69-70, 80, 88, 99,104, 148,
236, 240
Pouillon Henri 121
Pseudo-Dionizy 120, 134-135, 137
Putnam Hilary 225, 247
Pyle Andrew 3 2
Q
Quine Willard Van Orman 100-101, 103-108, 111-113, 169,
172-173, 204, 234-235, 277,
302
R
Ramsey Francis 23
Raven John Earle 39
Reale Giovanni 51, 55
Rosch Eleanor 237, 239
Rosemann Walter 149
Ross William David 58-59, 68,163
Russell Bertrand Arthur 100, 104-105, 255, 277, 283, 291
Rygalski Andrzej 258
Ryle Gilbert 215
S
Salamon Janusz 32
Schofield Malcolm 39
INDERS OSOBOWY
342
Scott Robert 51, 57, 61
Sekstus Empiryk (Sextus
Empiricus) 39, 41, 44
Sokrates 54, 58, 64, 101,103,109-lio , 308
Stein Edyta 91
St^pien Antoni Bazyli 92, 97,182* -183
Stewart John Alexander 59
Strawson Peter Frederick 100, 265
Strözewski Wladyslaw 31,59-60,
77,146,149, 175-176,178
Swiezawski Stefan 87-89, 92,184,
223, 225, 267-268
Swinburne Richard 32
Szkot Duns Jan (Johannes D.
Scotus) 99,118-119,158-167,
175, 285,301
Szl^zak Thomas Alexander 55
Szubka Tadeusz 101
Szymura Jerzy 32
T
Tarän Leonardo 46
Tarski Alfred 112,199, 287
Tomasz z Akwinu sw. 22, 29, 79,85,
118-120,128,131,142-158, 267
Tugendhat Ernst 76, 78
Turing Alan Mathison 273
Tversky Amos 238
Twardowski Kazimierz 109,112,
212, 280, 301
W
Wais Kazimierz 82-83, 91
Wedberg Anders 59
Weisheipl James A. 142
Weitz Morris 230
Whitehead Alfred North 291
Wilhelm z Auxerre 121
Williams Christopher John Fards
100-101, 104, 109-113, 201-205,235
Wittgenstein Ludwig 172, 237
Wojtysiak Jacek 199
Wolehski Jan 17, 31, 83-84, 96,
101,104-105, 109,112-113,
196-197,199, 212, 228-229,
280, 287, 298-299
Woiter Allan Bernard 158-159,162
Z
Zalta Edward N. 103
Zemach Eddy M. 192-195
Zielinski Edward Iwo 158-160,
162,164-165
Zieminska Renata 289
Bayerische
ne
Staatsbibiiotln
München
\
jthok I
"
J |
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| author | Kołodziejczyk, Sebastian T. 1973- |
| author_GND | (DE-588)1048710092 |
| author_facet | Kołodziejczyk, Sebastian T. 1973- |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Kołodziejczyk, Sebastian T. 1973- |
| author_variant | s t k st stk |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV044625082 |
| contents | Bibliogr. s. [311]-331. Indeks |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1028536272 (DE-599)BVBBV044625082 |
| edition | Wydanie 2 |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nam a2200000 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV044625082</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20180613</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">171114s2017 |||| 00||| pol d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9788323132158</subfield><subfield code="9">978-83-231-3215-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1028536272</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV044625082</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">pol</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kołodziejczyk, Sebastian T.</subfield><subfield code="d">1973-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1048710092</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Granice pojęciowe metafizyki</subfield><subfield code="b">= Conceptual boundaries of metaphysics</subfield><subfield code="c">Sebastian Tomasz Kołodziejczyk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="246" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Conceptual boundaries of metaphysics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wydanie 2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Toruń</subfield><subfield code="b">Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika</subfield><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">342 Seiten</subfield><subfield code="c">21 cm</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Res Humanae</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bibliogr. s. [311]-331. Indeks</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="534" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="c">2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="546" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zusammenfassung in englischer Sprache</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Metafizyka</subfield><subfield code="2">jhpk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Ontologia</subfield><subfield code="2">jhpk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Transcendentalia</subfield><subfield code="2">jhpk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Filozofia nowożytna</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Filozofia starożytna</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Filozofia starożytnej Grecji</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Filozofia średniowieczna</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Filozofia współczesna</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Ontologia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Metafizyka</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Pojęcia graniczne</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Scholastyka</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Teoria poznania</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Transcendentalia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Metaphysik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4038936-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Ontologie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4075660-9</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Metaphysik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4038936-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Ontologie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4075660-9</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="775" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Nachdruck von</subfield><subfield code="a">Sebastian Tomasz Kołodziejczyk</subfield><subfield code="t">Granice pojęciowe metafizyki</subfield><subfield code="d">Wrocław : Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego, 2006</subfield><subfield code="h">318 Seiten</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030023253&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030023253&sequence=000002&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Literaturverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030023253&sequence=000003&line_number=0003&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030023253&sequence=000004&line_number=0004&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Register // Personenregister</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">001.09</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="g">438</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030023253</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV044625082 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-09-12T00:16:03Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9788323132158 |
| language | Polish |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030023253 |
| oclc_num | 1028536272 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 |
| physical | 342 Seiten 21 cm |
| publishDate | 2017 |
| publishDateSearch | 2017 |
| publishDateSort | 2017 |
| publisher | Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | Res Humanae |
| spelling | Kołodziejczyk, Sebastian T. 1973- Verfasser (DE-588)1048710092 aut Granice pojęciowe metafizyki = Conceptual boundaries of metaphysics Sebastian Tomasz Kołodziejczyk Conceptual boundaries of metaphysics Wydanie 2 Toruń Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika 2017 342 Seiten 21 cm txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Res Humanae Bibliogr. s. [311]-331. Indeks 2006 Zusammenfassung in englischer Sprache Metafizyka jhpk Ontologia jhpk Transcendentalia jhpk Filozofia nowożytna Filozofia starożytna Filozofia starożytnej Grecji Filozofia średniowieczna Filozofia współczesna Ontologia Metafizyka Pojęcia graniczne Scholastyka Teoria poznania Transcendentalia Metaphysik (DE-588)4038936-4 gnd rswk-swf Ontologie (DE-588)4075660-9 gnd rswk-swf Metaphysik (DE-588)4038936-4 s Ontologie (DE-588)4075660-9 s DE-604 Nachdruck von Sebastian Tomasz Kołodziejczyk Granice pojęciowe metafizyki Wrocław : Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego, 2006 318 Seiten Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030023253&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030023253&sequence=000002&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Literaturverzeichnis Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030023253&sequence=000003&line_number=0003&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Abstract Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030023253&sequence=000004&line_number=0004&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Register // Personenregister |
| spellingShingle | Kołodziejczyk, Sebastian T. 1973- Granice pojęciowe metafizyki = Conceptual boundaries of metaphysics Bibliogr. s. [311]-331. Indeks Metafizyka jhpk Ontologia jhpk Transcendentalia jhpk Filozofia nowożytna Filozofia starożytna Filozofia starożytnej Grecji Filozofia średniowieczna Filozofia współczesna Ontologia Metafizyka Pojęcia graniczne Scholastyka Teoria poznania Transcendentalia Metaphysik (DE-588)4038936-4 gnd Ontologie (DE-588)4075660-9 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4038936-4 (DE-588)4075660-9 |
| title | Granice pojęciowe metafizyki = Conceptual boundaries of metaphysics |
| title_alt | Conceptual boundaries of metaphysics |
| title_auth | Granice pojęciowe metafizyki = Conceptual boundaries of metaphysics |
| title_exact_search | Granice pojęciowe metafizyki = Conceptual boundaries of metaphysics |
| title_full | Granice pojęciowe metafizyki = Conceptual boundaries of metaphysics Sebastian Tomasz Kołodziejczyk |
| title_fullStr | Granice pojęciowe metafizyki = Conceptual boundaries of metaphysics Sebastian Tomasz Kołodziejczyk |
| title_full_unstemmed | Granice pojęciowe metafizyki = Conceptual boundaries of metaphysics Sebastian Tomasz Kołodziejczyk |
| title_short | Granice pojęciowe metafizyki |
| title_sort | granice pojeciowe metafizyki conceptual boundaries of metaphysics |
| title_sub | = Conceptual boundaries of metaphysics |
| topic | Metafizyka jhpk Ontologia jhpk Transcendentalia jhpk Filozofia nowożytna Filozofia starożytna Filozofia starożytnej Grecji Filozofia średniowieczna Filozofia współczesna Ontologia Metafizyka Pojęcia graniczne Scholastyka Teoria poznania Transcendentalia Metaphysik (DE-588)4038936-4 gnd Ontologie (DE-588)4075660-9 gnd |
| topic_facet | Metafizyka Ontologia Transcendentalia Filozofia nowożytna Filozofia starożytna Filozofia starożytnej Grecji Filozofia średniowieczna Filozofia współczesna Pojęcia graniczne Scholastyka Teoria poznania Metaphysik Ontologie |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030023253&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030023253&sequence=000002&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030023253&sequence=000003&line_number=0003&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030023253&sequence=000004&line_number=0004&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT kołodziejczyksebastiant granicepojeciowemetafizykiconceptualboundariesofmetaphysics AT kołodziejczyksebastiant conceptualboundariesofmetaphysics |