U.S. Supreme Court opinions and their audiences:
"This book is the first study specifically to investigate the extent to which US Supreme Court justices alter the clarity of their opinions based on expected reactions from their audiences. The authors examine this dynamic by creating a unique measure of opinion clarity and then testing whether...
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge, United Kingdom
Cambridge University Press
2017
|
| Ausgabe: | First paperback edition |
| Schriftenreihe: | Media, war and security
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Zusammenfassung: | "This book is the first study specifically to investigate the extent to which US Supreme Court justices alter the clarity of their opinions based on expected reactions from their audiences. The authors examine this dynamic by creating a unique measure of opinion clarity and then testing whether the Court writes clearer opinions when it faces ideologically hostile and ideologically scattered lower federal courts; when it decides cases involving poorly performing federal agencies; when it decides cases involving states with less professionalized legislatures and governors; and when it rules against public opinion. The data shows the Court writes clearer opinions in every one of these contexts, and demonstrates that actors are more likely to comply with clearer Court opinions"-- |
| Beschreibung: | Includes bibliographical references (pages 161-177) and index |
| Beschreibung: | ix, 185 Seiten Diagramme 24 cm |
| ISBN: | 9781316502105 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV044548762 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20180125 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 171020s2017 |||| |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9781316502105 |9 978-1-316-50210-5 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1011380978 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV044548762 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-188 | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Black, Ryan C. |d 1982- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1042214654 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a U.S. Supreme Court opinions and their audiences |c Ryan C. Black, Ryan J. Owens, Justin Wedeking, Patrick C. Wohlfarth |
| 250 | |a First paperback edition | ||
| 264 | 1 | |a Cambridge, United Kingdom |b Cambridge University Press |c 2017 | |
| 300 | |a ix, 185 Seiten |b Diagramme |c 24 cm | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a Media, war and security | |
| 500 | |a Includes bibliographical references (pages 161-177) and index | ||
| 505 | 8 | |a A theory : using opinion clarity to enhance compliance and manage public support -- Estimating the clarity of Supreme Court opinions -- Supreme Court opinions and Federal Circuit Courts -- Supreme Court opinions and federal agency implementors -- Supreme Court opinions and the states -- Supreme Court opinions and the secondary population -- Establishing compliance as a function of clarity | |
| 520 | |a "This book is the first study specifically to investigate the extent to which US Supreme Court justices alter the clarity of their opinions based on expected reactions from their audiences. The authors examine this dynamic by creating a unique measure of opinion clarity and then testing whether the Court writes clearer opinions when it faces ideologically hostile and ideologically scattered lower federal courts; when it decides cases involving poorly performing federal agencies; when it decides cases involving states with less professionalized legislatures and governors; and when it rules against public opinion. The data shows the Court writes clearer opinions in every one of these contexts, and demonstrates that actors are more likely to comply with clearer Court opinions"-- | ||
| 610 | 1 | 4 | |a United States / Supreme Court |
| 610 | 1 | 7 | |a United States / Supreme Court |2 fast |
| 610 | 2 | 7 | |a USA |b Supreme Court |0 (DE-588)35650-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 4 | |a Judicial opinions / United States / Language | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Judges / United States / Public opinion | |
| 650 | 7 | |a LAW / General |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Judges / Public opinion |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Judicial opinions / Language |2 fast | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Begründung |0 (DE-588)4005252-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Verständlichkeit |0 (DE-588)4259176-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Rezeption |0 (DE-588)4049716-1 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Kontext |0 (DE-588)4165149-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Urteil |0 (DE-588)4062174-1 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 7 | |a United States |2 fast | |
| 651 | 4 | |a USA | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a USA |b Supreme Court |0 (DE-588)35650-5 |D b |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Urteil |0 (DE-588)4062174-1 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Begründung |0 (DE-588)4005252-7 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |a Verständlichkeit |0 (DE-588)4259176-4 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 4 | |a Kontext |0 (DE-588)4165149-2 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 5 | |a Rezeption |0 (DE-588)4049716-1 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Owens, Ryan J. |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Wedeking, Justin |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1052067468 |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Wohlfarth, Patrick C. |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1103811592 |4 aut | |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029947665 | ||
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 340.09 |e 22/bsb |f 090511 |g 73 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 340.09 |e 22/bsb |f 0904 |g 73 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804177911431823360 |
|---|---|
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Black, Ryan C. 1982- Owens, Ryan J. Wedeking, Justin Wohlfarth, Patrick C. |
| author_GND | (DE-588)1042214654 (DE-588)1052067468 (DE-588)1103811592 |
| author_facet | Black, Ryan C. 1982- Owens, Ryan J. Wedeking, Justin Wohlfarth, Patrick C. |
| author_role | aut aut aut aut |
| author_sort | Black, Ryan C. 1982- |
| author_variant | r c b rc rcb r j o rj rjo j w jw p c w pc pcw |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV044548762 |
| contents | A theory : using opinion clarity to enhance compliance and manage public support -- Estimating the clarity of Supreme Court opinions -- Supreme Court opinions and Federal Circuit Courts -- Supreme Court opinions and federal agency implementors -- Supreme Court opinions and the states -- Supreme Court opinions and the secondary population -- Establishing compliance as a function of clarity |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1011380978 (DE-599)BVBBV044548762 |
| edition | First paperback edition |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03584nam a2200637 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV044548762</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20180125 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">171020s2017 |||| |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781316502105</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-316-50210-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1011380978</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV044548762</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Black, Ryan C.</subfield><subfield code="d">1982-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1042214654</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">U.S. Supreme Court opinions and their audiences</subfield><subfield code="c">Ryan C. Black, Ryan J. Owens, Justin Wedeking, Patrick C. Wohlfarth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">First paperback edition</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cambridge, United Kingdom</subfield><subfield code="b">Cambridge University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ix, 185 Seiten</subfield><subfield code="b">Diagramme</subfield><subfield code="c">24 cm</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Media, war and security</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references (pages 161-177) and index</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">A theory : using opinion clarity to enhance compliance and manage public support -- Estimating the clarity of Supreme Court opinions -- Supreme Court opinions and Federal Circuit Courts -- Supreme Court opinions and federal agency implementors -- Supreme Court opinions and the states -- Supreme Court opinions and the secondary population -- Establishing compliance as a function of clarity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"This book is the first study specifically to investigate the extent to which US Supreme Court justices alter the clarity of their opinions based on expected reactions from their audiences. The authors examine this dynamic by creating a unique measure of opinion clarity and then testing whether the Court writes clearer opinions when it faces ideologically hostile and ideologically scattered lower federal courts; when it decides cases involving poorly performing federal agencies; when it decides cases involving states with less professionalized legislatures and governors; and when it rules against public opinion. The data shows the Court writes clearer opinions in every one of these contexts, and demonstrates that actors are more likely to comply with clearer Court opinions"--</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">United States / Supreme Court</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="1" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">United States / Supreme Court</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="b">Supreme Court</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)35650-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Judicial opinions / United States / Language</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Judges / United States / Public opinion</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW / General</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Judges / Public opinion</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Judicial opinions / Language</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Begründung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4005252-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Verständlichkeit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4259176-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rezeption</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4049716-1</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Kontext</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4165149-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Urteil</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4062174-1</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">United States</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="b">Supreme Court</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)35650-5</subfield><subfield code="D">b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Urteil</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4062174-1</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Begründung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4005252-7</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Verständlichkeit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4259176-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Kontext</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4165149-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="5"><subfield code="a">Rezeption</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4049716-1</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Owens, Ryan J.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wedeking, Justin</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1052067468</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wohlfarth, Patrick C.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1103811592</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029947665</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">340.09</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">090511</subfield><subfield code="g">73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">340.09</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">0904</subfield><subfield code="g">73</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | United States fast USA |
| geographic_facet | United States USA |
| id | DE-604.BV044548762 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T07:55:36Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9781316502105 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029947665 |
| oclc_num | 1011380978 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-188 |
| owner_facet | DE-188 |
| physical | ix, 185 Seiten Diagramme 24 cm |
| publishDate | 2017 |
| publishDateSearch | 2017 |
| publishDateSort | 2017 |
| publisher | Cambridge University Press |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | Media, war and security |
| spelling | Black, Ryan C. 1982- Verfasser (DE-588)1042214654 aut U.S. Supreme Court opinions and their audiences Ryan C. Black, Ryan J. Owens, Justin Wedeking, Patrick C. Wohlfarth First paperback edition Cambridge, United Kingdom Cambridge University Press 2017 ix, 185 Seiten Diagramme 24 cm txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Media, war and security Includes bibliographical references (pages 161-177) and index A theory : using opinion clarity to enhance compliance and manage public support -- Estimating the clarity of Supreme Court opinions -- Supreme Court opinions and Federal Circuit Courts -- Supreme Court opinions and federal agency implementors -- Supreme Court opinions and the states -- Supreme Court opinions and the secondary population -- Establishing compliance as a function of clarity "This book is the first study specifically to investigate the extent to which US Supreme Court justices alter the clarity of their opinions based on expected reactions from their audiences. The authors examine this dynamic by creating a unique measure of opinion clarity and then testing whether the Court writes clearer opinions when it faces ideologically hostile and ideologically scattered lower federal courts; when it decides cases involving poorly performing federal agencies; when it decides cases involving states with less professionalized legislatures and governors; and when it rules against public opinion. The data shows the Court writes clearer opinions in every one of these contexts, and demonstrates that actors are more likely to comply with clearer Court opinions"-- United States / Supreme Court United States / Supreme Court fast USA Supreme Court (DE-588)35650-5 gnd rswk-swf Judicial opinions / United States / Language Judges / United States / Public opinion LAW / General bisacsh Judges / Public opinion fast Judicial opinions / Language fast Begründung (DE-588)4005252-7 gnd rswk-swf Verständlichkeit (DE-588)4259176-4 gnd rswk-swf Rezeption (DE-588)4049716-1 gnd rswk-swf Kontext (DE-588)4165149-2 gnd rswk-swf Urteil (DE-588)4062174-1 gnd rswk-swf United States fast USA USA Supreme Court (DE-588)35650-5 b Urteil (DE-588)4062174-1 s Begründung (DE-588)4005252-7 s Verständlichkeit (DE-588)4259176-4 s Kontext (DE-588)4165149-2 s Rezeption (DE-588)4049716-1 s DE-604 Owens, Ryan J. Verfasser aut Wedeking, Justin Verfasser (DE-588)1052067468 aut Wohlfarth, Patrick C. Verfasser (DE-588)1103811592 aut |
| spellingShingle | Black, Ryan C. 1982- Owens, Ryan J. Wedeking, Justin Wohlfarth, Patrick C. U.S. Supreme Court opinions and their audiences A theory : using opinion clarity to enhance compliance and manage public support -- Estimating the clarity of Supreme Court opinions -- Supreme Court opinions and Federal Circuit Courts -- Supreme Court opinions and federal agency implementors -- Supreme Court opinions and the states -- Supreme Court opinions and the secondary population -- Establishing compliance as a function of clarity United States / Supreme Court United States / Supreme Court fast USA Supreme Court (DE-588)35650-5 gnd Judicial opinions / United States / Language Judges / United States / Public opinion LAW / General bisacsh Judges / Public opinion fast Judicial opinions / Language fast Begründung (DE-588)4005252-7 gnd Verständlichkeit (DE-588)4259176-4 gnd Rezeption (DE-588)4049716-1 gnd Kontext (DE-588)4165149-2 gnd Urteil (DE-588)4062174-1 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)35650-5 (DE-588)4005252-7 (DE-588)4259176-4 (DE-588)4049716-1 (DE-588)4165149-2 (DE-588)4062174-1 |
| title | U.S. Supreme Court opinions and their audiences |
| title_auth | U.S. Supreme Court opinions and their audiences |
| title_exact_search | U.S. Supreme Court opinions and their audiences |
| title_full | U.S. Supreme Court opinions and their audiences Ryan C. Black, Ryan J. Owens, Justin Wedeking, Patrick C. Wohlfarth |
| title_fullStr | U.S. Supreme Court opinions and their audiences Ryan C. Black, Ryan J. Owens, Justin Wedeking, Patrick C. Wohlfarth |
| title_full_unstemmed | U.S. Supreme Court opinions and their audiences Ryan C. Black, Ryan J. Owens, Justin Wedeking, Patrick C. Wohlfarth |
| title_short | U.S. Supreme Court opinions and their audiences |
| title_sort | u s supreme court opinions and their audiences |
| topic | United States / Supreme Court United States / Supreme Court fast USA Supreme Court (DE-588)35650-5 gnd Judicial opinions / United States / Language Judges / United States / Public opinion LAW / General bisacsh Judges / Public opinion fast Judicial opinions / Language fast Begründung (DE-588)4005252-7 gnd Verständlichkeit (DE-588)4259176-4 gnd Rezeption (DE-588)4049716-1 gnd Kontext (DE-588)4165149-2 gnd Urteil (DE-588)4062174-1 gnd |
| topic_facet | United States / Supreme Court USA Supreme Court Judicial opinions / United States / Language Judges / United States / Public opinion LAW / General Judges / Public opinion Judicial opinions / Language Begründung Verständlichkeit Rezeption Kontext Urteil United States USA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT blackryanc ussupremecourtopinionsandtheiraudiences AT owensryanj ussupremecourtopinionsandtheiraudiences AT wedekingjustin ussupremecourtopinionsandtheiraudiences AT wohlfarthpatrickc ussupremecourtopinionsandtheiraudiences |