An analysis of Edmund Gettier's Is justified true belief knowledge?:
"For 2,000 years, the standard philosophical model of knowledge was that it could be defined as a justified true belief. According to this way of thinking, we can know, for example, that we are human because [1] we believe ourselves to be human; [2] that belief is justified (others treat us as...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
London
Routledge
[2017]
|
| Schriftenreihe: | The Macat Library
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis Klappentext |
| Zusammenfassung: | "For 2,000 years, the standard philosophical model of knowledge was that it could be defined as a justified true belief. According to this way of thinking, we can know, for example, that we are human because [1] we believe ourselves to be human; [2] that belief is justified (others treat us as humans, not as dogs); and [3] the belief is true. This definition, which dates to Plato, was challenged by Edmund Gettier in one of the most influential works of philosophy published in the last century--a three page paper that produced two clear examples of justified true beliefs that could not, in fact, be considered knowledge. Gettier's achievement rests on solid foundations provided by his mastery of the critical thinking skill of analysis. By understanding the way in which Plato--and every other epistemologist--had built their arguments, he was able to identify the relationships between the parts, and the assumptions that underpinned then. That precise understanding was what Gettier required to mount a convincing challenge to the theory--one that was bolstered by a reasoning skill that put his counter case pithily, and in a form his colleagues found all but unchallengeable."--Provided by publisher |
| Beschreibung: | 83 Seiten |
| ISBN: | 9781912127498 9781912302987 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV044541610 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20171129 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 171017s2017 b||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9781912127498 |c paperback |9 978-1-912127-49-8 | ||
| 020 | |a 9781912302987 |c hardback |9 978-1-912302-98-7 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1011391807 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV044541610 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-384 | ||
| 084 | |a CC 4400 |0 (DE-625)17626: |2 rvk | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Schukraft, Jason |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a An analysis of Edmund Gettier's Is justified true belief knowledge? |c Jason Schukraft |
| 246 | 1 | 3 | |a Edmund Gettier's Is justified true belief knowledge? |
| 264 | 1 | |a London |b Routledge |c [2017] | |
| 300 | |a 83 Seiten | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a The Macat Library | |
| 520 | 3 | |a "For 2,000 years, the standard philosophical model of knowledge was that it could be defined as a justified true belief. According to this way of thinking, we can know, for example, that we are human because [1] we believe ourselves to be human; [2] that belief is justified (others treat us as humans, not as dogs); and [3] the belief is true. This definition, which dates to Plato, was challenged by Edmund Gettier in one of the most influential works of philosophy published in the last century--a three page paper that produced two clear examples of justified true beliefs that could not, in fact, be considered knowledge. Gettier's achievement rests on solid foundations provided by his mastery of the critical thinking skill of analysis. By understanding the way in which Plato--and every other epistemologist--had built their arguments, he was able to identify the relationships between the parts, and the assumptions that underpinned then. That precise understanding was what Gettier required to mount a convincing challenge to the theory--one that was bolstered by a reasoning skill that put his counter case pithily, and in a form his colleagues found all but unchallengeable."--Provided by publisher | |
| 600 | 1 | 7 | |a Gettier, Edmund L. |d 1927- |0 (DE-588)129098868 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Philosophie |0 (DE-588)4045791-6 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Rechtfertigung |0 (DE-588)4048748-9 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Erkenntnistheorie |0 (DE-588)4070914-0 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Wissen |0 (DE-588)4066559-8 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 653 | 1 | |a Gettier, Edmund L. / Is justified true belief knowledge / Criticism and interpretation | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Justification (Theory of knowledge) | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Analysis (Philosophy) | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Gettier, Edmund L. |d 1927- |0 (DE-588)129098868 |D p |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Wissen |0 (DE-588)4066559-8 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Erkenntnistheorie |0 (DE-588)4070914-0 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |a Rechtfertigung |0 (DE-588)4048748-9 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 4 | |a Philosophie |0 (DE-588)4045791-6 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Online-Ausgabe |z 978-1-912281-86-2 |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung UB Augsburg - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029940692&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung UB Augsburg - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029940692&sequence=000002&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Klappentext |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029940692 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804177899337547776 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | CONTENTS
WAYS IN TO THE TEXT
Who Is Edmund Gettier? 9
What Does “Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?” Say? 10
Why Does “Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?” Matter? 12
SECTION 1: INFLUENCES
Module 1 :The Author and the Historical Context 15
Module 2: Academic Context 20
Module 3:The Problem 24
Module 4:The Author’s Contribution 28
SECTION 2: IDEAS
Module 5: Main Ideas 33
Module 6: Secondary Ideas 38
Module 7: Achievement 43
Module 8: Place in the Author s Work 48
SECTION 3: IMPACT
Module 9:The First Responses 53
Module 10 : The Evolving Debate 58
Module 11 : Impact and Influence Today 62
Module 12:Where Next? 67
Glossary of Terms 72
People Mentioned in the Text 7 5
Works Cited 81
cai
d
|
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| author | Schukraft, Jason |
| author_facet | Schukraft, Jason |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Schukraft, Jason |
| author_variant | j s js |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV044541610 |
| classification_rvk | CC 4400 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1011391807 (DE-599)BVBBV044541610 |
| discipline | Philosophie |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03613nam a2200517 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV044541610</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20171129 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">171017s2017 b||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781912127498</subfield><subfield code="c">paperback</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-912127-49-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781912302987</subfield><subfield code="c">hardback</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-912302-98-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1011391807</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV044541610</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-384</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">CC 4400</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)17626:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Schukraft, Jason</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">An analysis of Edmund Gettier's Is justified true belief knowledge?</subfield><subfield code="c">Jason Schukraft</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="246" ind1="1" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Edmund Gettier's Is justified true belief knowledge?</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">London</subfield><subfield code="b">Routledge</subfield><subfield code="c">[2017]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">83 Seiten</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The Macat Library</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"For 2,000 years, the standard philosophical model of knowledge was that it could be defined as a justified true belief. According to this way of thinking, we can know, for example, that we are human because [1] we believe ourselves to be human; [2] that belief is justified (others treat us as humans, not as dogs); and [3] the belief is true. This definition, which dates to Plato, was challenged by Edmund Gettier in one of the most influential works of philosophy published in the last century--a three page paper that produced two clear examples of justified true beliefs that could not, in fact, be considered knowledge. Gettier's achievement rests on solid foundations provided by his mastery of the critical thinking skill of analysis. By understanding the way in which Plato--and every other epistemologist--had built their arguments, he was able to identify the relationships between the parts, and the assumptions that underpinned then. That precise understanding was what Gettier required to mount a convincing challenge to the theory--one that was bolstered by a reasoning skill that put his counter case pithily, and in a form his colleagues found all but unchallengeable."--Provided by publisher</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="600" ind1="1" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Gettier, Edmund L.</subfield><subfield code="d">1927-</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)129098868</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Philosophie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4045791-6</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rechtfertigung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4048748-9</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Erkenntnistheorie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4070914-0</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Wissen</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4066559-8</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Gettier, Edmund L. / Is justified true belief knowledge / Criticism and interpretation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Justification (Theory of knowledge)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Analysis (Philosophy)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Gettier, Edmund L.</subfield><subfield code="d">1927-</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)129098868</subfield><subfield code="D">p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Wissen</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4066559-8</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Erkenntnistheorie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4070914-0</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Rechtfertigung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4048748-9</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Philosophie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4045791-6</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Online-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">978-1-912281-86-2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung UB Augsburg - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029940692&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung UB Augsburg - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029940692&sequence=000002&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Klappentext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029940692</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV044541610 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T07:55:24Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9781912127498 9781912302987 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029940692 |
| oclc_num | 1011391807 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-384 |
| owner_facet | DE-384 |
| physical | 83 Seiten |
| publishDate | 2017 |
| publishDateSearch | 2017 |
| publishDateSort | 2017 |
| publisher | Routledge |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | The Macat Library |
| spelling | Schukraft, Jason Verfasser aut An analysis of Edmund Gettier's Is justified true belief knowledge? Jason Schukraft Edmund Gettier's Is justified true belief knowledge? London Routledge [2017] 83 Seiten txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier The Macat Library "For 2,000 years, the standard philosophical model of knowledge was that it could be defined as a justified true belief. According to this way of thinking, we can know, for example, that we are human because [1] we believe ourselves to be human; [2] that belief is justified (others treat us as humans, not as dogs); and [3] the belief is true. This definition, which dates to Plato, was challenged by Edmund Gettier in one of the most influential works of philosophy published in the last century--a three page paper that produced two clear examples of justified true beliefs that could not, in fact, be considered knowledge. Gettier's achievement rests on solid foundations provided by his mastery of the critical thinking skill of analysis. By understanding the way in which Plato--and every other epistemologist--had built their arguments, he was able to identify the relationships between the parts, and the assumptions that underpinned then. That precise understanding was what Gettier required to mount a convincing challenge to the theory--one that was bolstered by a reasoning skill that put his counter case pithily, and in a form his colleagues found all but unchallengeable."--Provided by publisher Gettier, Edmund L. 1927- (DE-588)129098868 gnd rswk-swf Philosophie (DE-588)4045791-6 gnd rswk-swf Rechtfertigung (DE-588)4048748-9 gnd rswk-swf Erkenntnistheorie (DE-588)4070914-0 gnd rswk-swf Wissen (DE-588)4066559-8 gnd rswk-swf Gettier, Edmund L. / Is justified true belief knowledge / Criticism and interpretation Justification (Theory of knowledge) Analysis (Philosophy) Gettier, Edmund L. 1927- (DE-588)129098868 p Wissen (DE-588)4066559-8 s Erkenntnistheorie (DE-588)4070914-0 s Rechtfertigung (DE-588)4048748-9 s Philosophie (DE-588)4045791-6 s DE-604 Erscheint auch als Online-Ausgabe 978-1-912281-86-2 Digitalisierung UB Augsburg - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029940692&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis Digitalisierung UB Augsburg - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029940692&sequence=000002&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Klappentext |
| spellingShingle | Schukraft, Jason An analysis of Edmund Gettier's Is justified true belief knowledge? Gettier, Edmund L. 1927- (DE-588)129098868 gnd Philosophie (DE-588)4045791-6 gnd Rechtfertigung (DE-588)4048748-9 gnd Erkenntnistheorie (DE-588)4070914-0 gnd Wissen (DE-588)4066559-8 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)129098868 (DE-588)4045791-6 (DE-588)4048748-9 (DE-588)4070914-0 (DE-588)4066559-8 |
| title | An analysis of Edmund Gettier's Is justified true belief knowledge? |
| title_alt | Edmund Gettier's Is justified true belief knowledge? |
| title_auth | An analysis of Edmund Gettier's Is justified true belief knowledge? |
| title_exact_search | An analysis of Edmund Gettier's Is justified true belief knowledge? |
| title_full | An analysis of Edmund Gettier's Is justified true belief knowledge? Jason Schukraft |
| title_fullStr | An analysis of Edmund Gettier's Is justified true belief knowledge? Jason Schukraft |
| title_full_unstemmed | An analysis of Edmund Gettier's Is justified true belief knowledge? Jason Schukraft |
| title_short | An analysis of Edmund Gettier's Is justified true belief knowledge? |
| title_sort | an analysis of edmund gettier s is justified true belief knowledge |
| topic | Gettier, Edmund L. 1927- (DE-588)129098868 gnd Philosophie (DE-588)4045791-6 gnd Rechtfertigung (DE-588)4048748-9 gnd Erkenntnistheorie (DE-588)4070914-0 gnd Wissen (DE-588)4066559-8 gnd |
| topic_facet | Gettier, Edmund L. 1927- Philosophie Rechtfertigung Erkenntnistheorie Wissen |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029940692&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029940692&sequence=000002&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT schukraftjason ananalysisofedmundgettiersisjustifiedtruebeliefknowledge AT schukraftjason edmundgettiersisjustifiedtruebeliefknowledge |