Mental capacity in relationship: decision-making, dialogue, and autonomy
Recent legal developments challenge how valid the concept of mental capacity is in determining whether individuals with impairments can make decisions about their care and treatment. Kong defends a concept of mental capacity but argues that such assessments must consider how relationships and dialog...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge
Cambridge University Press
2017
|
| Schriftenreihe: | Cambridge bioethics and law
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | BSB01 URL des Erstveröffentlichers |
| Zusammenfassung: | Recent legal developments challenge how valid the concept of mental capacity is in determining whether individuals with impairments can make decisions about their care and treatment. Kong defends a concept of mental capacity but argues that such assessments must consider how relationships and dialogue can enable or disable the decision-making abilities of these individuals. This is thoroughly investigated using an interdisciplinary approach that combines philosophy and legal analysis of the law in England and Wales, the European Court of Human Rights, and the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. By exploring key concepts underlying mental capacity, the investigation concludes that both primary relationships and capacity assessments themselves must display key competencies to ensure that autonomy skills are promoted and encouraged. This ultimately provides scope for justifiable interventions into disabling relationships and articulates the dialogical practices that help better situate, interpret, and understand the choices and actions of individuals with impairments |
| Beschreibung: | Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 17 Jul 2017) |
| Beschreibung: | 1 online resource (xiii, 258 pages) |
| ISBN: | 9781316683088 |
| DOI: | 10.1017/9781316683088 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV044537561 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20180410 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 171013s2017 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9781316683088 |9 978-1-316-68308-8 | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/9781316683088 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (ZDB-20-CBO)CR9781316683088 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1011396919 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV044537561 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 344.044 | |
| 100 | 1 | |a Kong, Camillia |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Mental capacity in relationship |b decision-making, dialogue, and autonomy |c Camillia Kong |
| 264 | 1 | |a Cambridge |b Cambridge University Press |c 2017 | |
| 300 | |a 1 online resource (xiii, 258 pages) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a Cambridge bioethics and law | |
| 500 | |a Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 17 Jul 2017) | ||
| 520 | |a Recent legal developments challenge how valid the concept of mental capacity is in determining whether individuals with impairments can make decisions about their care and treatment. Kong defends a concept of mental capacity but argues that such assessments must consider how relationships and dialogue can enable or disable the decision-making abilities of these individuals. This is thoroughly investigated using an interdisciplinary approach that combines philosophy and legal analysis of the law in England and Wales, the European Court of Human Rights, and the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. By exploring key concepts underlying mental capacity, the investigation concludes that both primary relationships and capacity assessments themselves must display key competencies to ensure that autonomy skills are promoted and encouraged. This ultimately provides scope for justifiable interventions into disabling relationships and articulates the dialogical practices that help better situate, interpret, and understand the choices and actions of individuals with impairments | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Mental health laws | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Capacity and disability | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Decision making | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Interpersonal relations | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe, hardback |z 978-1-107-16400-0 |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe, paperback |z 978-1-316-61570-6 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316683088 |x Verlag |z URL des Erstveröffentlichers |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a ZDB-20-CBO | ||
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029936701 | ||
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316683088 |l BSB01 |p ZDB-20-CBO |q BSB_PDA_CBO_Kauf |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804177893710888960 |
|---|---|
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Kong, Camillia |
| author_facet | Kong, Camillia |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Kong, Camillia |
| author_variant | c k ck |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV044537561 |
| collection | ZDB-20-CBO |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-20-CBO)CR9781316683088 (OCoLC)1011396919 (DE-599)BVBBV044537561 |
| dewey-full | 344.044 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 344 - Labor, social, education & cultural law |
| dewey-raw | 344.044 |
| dewey-search | 344.044 |
| dewey-sort | 3344.044 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/9781316683088 |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02697nmm a2200433zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV044537561</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20180410 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">171013s2017 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781316683088</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-316-68308-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1017/9781316683088</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-20-CBO)CR9781316683088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1011396919</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV044537561</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">344.044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kong, Camillia</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Mental capacity in relationship</subfield><subfield code="b">decision-making, dialogue, and autonomy</subfield><subfield code="c">Camillia Kong</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cambridge</subfield><subfield code="b">Cambridge University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (xiii, 258 pages)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cambridge bioethics and law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 17 Jul 2017)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Recent legal developments challenge how valid the concept of mental capacity is in determining whether individuals with impairments can make decisions about their care and treatment. Kong defends a concept of mental capacity but argues that such assessments must consider how relationships and dialogue can enable or disable the decision-making abilities of these individuals. This is thoroughly investigated using an interdisciplinary approach that combines philosophy and legal analysis of the law in England and Wales, the European Court of Human Rights, and the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. By exploring key concepts underlying mental capacity, the investigation concludes that both primary relationships and capacity assessments themselves must display key competencies to ensure that autonomy skills are promoted and encouraged. This ultimately provides scope for justifiable interventions into disabling relationships and articulates the dialogical practices that help better situate, interpret, and understand the choices and actions of individuals with impairments</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Mental health laws</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Capacity and disability</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Decision making</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Interpersonal relations</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe, hardback</subfield><subfield code="z">978-1-107-16400-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe, paperback</subfield><subfield code="z">978-1-316-61570-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316683088</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">URL des Erstveröffentlichers</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029936701</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316683088</subfield><subfield code="l">BSB01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield><subfield code="q">BSB_PDA_CBO_Kauf</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV044537561 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T07:55:19Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9781316683088 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029936701 |
| oclc_num | 1011396919 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 |
| physical | 1 online resource (xiii, 258 pages) |
| psigel | ZDB-20-CBO ZDB-20-CBO BSB_PDA_CBO_Kauf |
| publishDate | 2017 |
| publishDateSearch | 2017 |
| publishDateSort | 2017 |
| publisher | Cambridge University Press |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | Cambridge bioethics and law |
| spelling | Kong, Camillia Verfasser aut Mental capacity in relationship decision-making, dialogue, and autonomy Camillia Kong Cambridge Cambridge University Press 2017 1 online resource (xiii, 258 pages) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Cambridge bioethics and law Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 17 Jul 2017) Recent legal developments challenge how valid the concept of mental capacity is in determining whether individuals with impairments can make decisions about their care and treatment. Kong defends a concept of mental capacity but argues that such assessments must consider how relationships and dialogue can enable or disable the decision-making abilities of these individuals. This is thoroughly investigated using an interdisciplinary approach that combines philosophy and legal analysis of the law in England and Wales, the European Court of Human Rights, and the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. By exploring key concepts underlying mental capacity, the investigation concludes that both primary relationships and capacity assessments themselves must display key competencies to ensure that autonomy skills are promoted and encouraged. This ultimately provides scope for justifiable interventions into disabling relationships and articulates the dialogical practices that help better situate, interpret, and understand the choices and actions of individuals with impairments Mental health laws Capacity and disability Decision making Interpersonal relations Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe, hardback 978-1-107-16400-0 Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe, paperback 978-1-316-61570-6 https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316683088 Verlag URL des Erstveröffentlichers Volltext |
| spellingShingle | Kong, Camillia Mental capacity in relationship decision-making, dialogue, and autonomy Mental health laws Capacity and disability Decision making Interpersonal relations |
| title | Mental capacity in relationship decision-making, dialogue, and autonomy |
| title_auth | Mental capacity in relationship decision-making, dialogue, and autonomy |
| title_exact_search | Mental capacity in relationship decision-making, dialogue, and autonomy |
| title_full | Mental capacity in relationship decision-making, dialogue, and autonomy Camillia Kong |
| title_fullStr | Mental capacity in relationship decision-making, dialogue, and autonomy Camillia Kong |
| title_full_unstemmed | Mental capacity in relationship decision-making, dialogue, and autonomy Camillia Kong |
| title_short | Mental capacity in relationship |
| title_sort | mental capacity in relationship decision making dialogue and autonomy |
| title_sub | decision-making, dialogue, and autonomy |
| topic | Mental health laws Capacity and disability Decision making Interpersonal relations |
| topic_facet | Mental health laws Capacity and disability Decision making Interpersonal relations |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316683088 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT kongcamillia mentalcapacityinrelationshipdecisionmakingdialogueandautonomy |