Settled versus right: a theory of precedent
In this timely book, Randy J. Kozel develops a theory of precedent designed to enhance the stability and impersonality of constitutional law. Kozel contends that the prevailing approach to precedent in American law is undermined by principled disagreements among judges over the proper means and ends...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge
Cambridge University Press
[2017]
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | BSB01 UBG01 UPA01 URL des Erstveröffentlichers |
| Zusammenfassung: | In this timely book, Randy J. Kozel develops a theory of precedent designed to enhance the stability and impersonality of constitutional law. Kozel contends that the prevailing approach to precedent in American law is undermined by principled disagreements among judges over the proper means and ends of constitutional interpretation. The structure and composition of the doctrine all but guarantee that conclusions about the durability of precedent will track individual views about whether decisions are right or wrong, and whether mistakes are harmful or benign. This is a serious challenge, but it also reveals a path toward maintaining legal continuity even as judges come and go. Kozel's account of precedent should be read by anyone interested in the nature of the judicial role and the trajectory of constitutional law |
| Beschreibung: | 1 online resource (x, 180 Seiten) |
| ISBN: | 9781316412237 |
| DOI: | 10.1017/9781316412237 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV044455184 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20220913 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 170821s2017 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9781316412237 |9 978-1-316-41223-7 | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/9781316412237 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (ZDB-20-CBO)CR9781316412237 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)995163045 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV044455184 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-473 |a DE-739 | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 347.73/001 | |
| 084 | |a PL 733 |0 (DE-625)137269: |2 rvk | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Kozel, Randy J. |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1163283789 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Settled versus right |b a theory of precedent |c Randy J. Kozel |
| 264 | 1 | |a Cambridge |b Cambridge University Press |c [2017] | |
| 264 | 4 | |c © 2017 | |
| 300 | |a 1 online resource (x, 180 Seiten) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 505 | 8 | |a Framing the study of precedent -- The stakes of deference -- Strength of constraint -- Scope of applicability -- Precedent and pluralism -- Precedential strength in doctrinal perspective -- Precedential strength in structural perspective -- Compromise, common ground, and precedential scope -- Implications and transitions | |
| 520 | |a In this timely book, Randy J. Kozel develops a theory of precedent designed to enhance the stability and impersonality of constitutional law. Kozel contends that the prevailing approach to precedent in American law is undermined by principled disagreements among judges over the proper means and ends of constitutional interpretation. The structure and composition of the doctrine all but guarantee that conclusions about the durability of precedent will track individual views about whether decisions are right or wrong, and whether mistakes are harmful or benign. This is a serious challenge, but it also reveals a path toward maintaining legal continuity even as judges come and go. Kozel's account of precedent should be read by anyone interested in the nature of the judicial role and the trajectory of constitutional law | ||
| 610 | 2 | 4 | |a United States / Supreme Court / Decision making |
| 650 | 4 | |a Verfassungsrecht | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Stare decisis / United States | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Constitutional law / United States | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Präjudiz |0 (DE-588)4046984-0 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Verfassungsrecht |0 (DE-588)4062801-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 4 | |a USA | |
| 651 | 7 | |a USA |0 (DE-588)4078704-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a USA |0 (DE-588)4078704-7 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Präjudiz |0 (DE-588)4046984-0 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Verfassungsrecht |0 (DE-588)4062801-2 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |8 1\p |5 DE-604 | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe, hardback |z 978-1-107-12753-1 |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe, paperback |z 978-1-107-56652-1 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316412237 |x Verlag |z URL des Erstveröffentlichers |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a ZDB-20-CBO | ||
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029855991 | ||
| 883 | 1 | |8 1\p |a cgwrk |d 20201028 |q DE-101 |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316412237 |l BSB01 |p ZDB-20-CBO |q BSB_PDA_CBO |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316412237 |l UBG01 |p ZDB-20-CBO |q UBG_PDA_CBO |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316412237 |l UPA01 |p ZDB-20-CBO |q UPA_PDA_CBO_Kauf2021 |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804177774186856448 |
|---|---|
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Kozel, Randy J. |
| author_GND | (DE-588)1163283789 |
| author_facet | Kozel, Randy J. |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Kozel, Randy J. |
| author_variant | r j k rj rjk |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV044455184 |
| classification_rvk | PL 733 |
| collection | ZDB-20-CBO |
| contents | Framing the study of precedent -- The stakes of deference -- Strength of constraint -- Scope of applicability -- Precedent and pluralism -- Precedential strength in doctrinal perspective -- Precedential strength in structural perspective -- Compromise, common ground, and precedential scope -- Implications and transitions |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-20-CBO)CR9781316412237 (OCoLC)995163045 (DE-599)BVBBV044455184 |
| dewey-full | 347.73/001 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 347 - Procedure and courts |
| dewey-raw | 347.73/001 |
| dewey-search | 347.73/001 |
| dewey-sort | 3347.73 11 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/9781316412237 |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03419nmm a2200577zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV044455184</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220913 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">170821s2017 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781316412237</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-316-41223-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1017/9781316412237</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-20-CBO)CR9781316412237</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)995163045</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV044455184</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">347.73/001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PL 733</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)137269:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kozel, Randy J.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1163283789</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Settled versus right</subfield><subfield code="b">a theory of precedent</subfield><subfield code="c">Randy J. Kozel</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cambridge</subfield><subfield code="b">Cambridge University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">[2017]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="c">© 2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (x, 180 Seiten)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Framing the study of precedent -- The stakes of deference -- Strength of constraint -- Scope of applicability -- Precedent and pluralism -- Precedential strength in doctrinal perspective -- Precedential strength in structural perspective -- Compromise, common ground, and precedential scope -- Implications and transitions</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In this timely book, Randy J. Kozel develops a theory of precedent designed to enhance the stability and impersonality of constitutional law. Kozel contends that the prevailing approach to precedent in American law is undermined by principled disagreements among judges over the proper means and ends of constitutional interpretation. The structure and composition of the doctrine all but guarantee that conclusions about the durability of precedent will track individual views about whether decisions are right or wrong, and whether mistakes are harmful or benign. This is a serious challenge, but it also reveals a path toward maintaining legal continuity even as judges come and go. Kozel's account of precedent should be read by anyone interested in the nature of the judicial role and the trajectory of constitutional law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">United States / Supreme Court / Decision making</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Verfassungsrecht</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Stare decisis / United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Constitutional law / United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Präjudiz</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4046984-0</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Verfassungsrecht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4062801-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078704-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078704-7</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Präjudiz</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4046984-0</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Verfassungsrecht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4062801-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe, hardback</subfield><subfield code="z">978-1-107-12753-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe, paperback</subfield><subfield code="z">978-1-107-56652-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316412237</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">URL des Erstveröffentlichers</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029855991</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="883" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="a">cgwrk</subfield><subfield code="d">20201028</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-101</subfield><subfield code="u">https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316412237</subfield><subfield code="l">BSB01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield><subfield code="q">BSB_PDA_CBO</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316412237</subfield><subfield code="l">UBG01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield><subfield code="q">UBG_PDA_CBO</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316412237</subfield><subfield code="l">UPA01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield><subfield code="q">UPA_PDA_CBO_Kauf2021</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | USA USA (DE-588)4078704-7 gnd |
| geographic_facet | USA |
| id | DE-604.BV044455184 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T07:53:25Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9781316412237 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029855991 |
| oclc_num | 995163045 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-739 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-739 |
| physical | 1 online resource (x, 180 Seiten) |
| psigel | ZDB-20-CBO ZDB-20-CBO BSB_PDA_CBO ZDB-20-CBO UBG_PDA_CBO ZDB-20-CBO UPA_PDA_CBO_Kauf2021 |
| publishDate | 2017 |
| publishDateSearch | 2017 |
| publishDateSort | 2017 |
| publisher | Cambridge University Press |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Kozel, Randy J. Verfasser (DE-588)1163283789 aut Settled versus right a theory of precedent Randy J. Kozel Cambridge Cambridge University Press [2017] © 2017 1 online resource (x, 180 Seiten) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Framing the study of precedent -- The stakes of deference -- Strength of constraint -- Scope of applicability -- Precedent and pluralism -- Precedential strength in doctrinal perspective -- Precedential strength in structural perspective -- Compromise, common ground, and precedential scope -- Implications and transitions In this timely book, Randy J. Kozel develops a theory of precedent designed to enhance the stability and impersonality of constitutional law. Kozel contends that the prevailing approach to precedent in American law is undermined by principled disagreements among judges over the proper means and ends of constitutional interpretation. The structure and composition of the doctrine all but guarantee that conclusions about the durability of precedent will track individual views about whether decisions are right or wrong, and whether mistakes are harmful or benign. This is a serious challenge, but it also reveals a path toward maintaining legal continuity even as judges come and go. Kozel's account of precedent should be read by anyone interested in the nature of the judicial role and the trajectory of constitutional law United States / Supreme Court / Decision making Verfassungsrecht Stare decisis / United States Constitutional law / United States Präjudiz (DE-588)4046984-0 gnd rswk-swf Verfassungsrecht (DE-588)4062801-2 gnd rswk-swf USA USA (DE-588)4078704-7 gnd rswk-swf USA (DE-588)4078704-7 g Präjudiz (DE-588)4046984-0 s Verfassungsrecht (DE-588)4062801-2 s 1\p DE-604 Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe, hardback 978-1-107-12753-1 Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe, paperback 978-1-107-56652-1 https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316412237 Verlag URL des Erstveröffentlichers Volltext 1\p cgwrk 20201028 DE-101 https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk |
| spellingShingle | Kozel, Randy J. Settled versus right a theory of precedent Framing the study of precedent -- The stakes of deference -- Strength of constraint -- Scope of applicability -- Precedent and pluralism -- Precedential strength in doctrinal perspective -- Precedential strength in structural perspective -- Compromise, common ground, and precedential scope -- Implications and transitions United States / Supreme Court / Decision making Verfassungsrecht Stare decisis / United States Constitutional law / United States Präjudiz (DE-588)4046984-0 gnd Verfassungsrecht (DE-588)4062801-2 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4046984-0 (DE-588)4062801-2 (DE-588)4078704-7 |
| title | Settled versus right a theory of precedent |
| title_auth | Settled versus right a theory of precedent |
| title_exact_search | Settled versus right a theory of precedent |
| title_full | Settled versus right a theory of precedent Randy J. Kozel |
| title_fullStr | Settled versus right a theory of precedent Randy J. Kozel |
| title_full_unstemmed | Settled versus right a theory of precedent Randy J. Kozel |
| title_short | Settled versus right |
| title_sort | settled versus right a theory of precedent |
| title_sub | a theory of precedent |
| topic | United States / Supreme Court / Decision making Verfassungsrecht Stare decisis / United States Constitutional law / United States Präjudiz (DE-588)4046984-0 gnd Verfassungsrecht (DE-588)4062801-2 gnd |
| topic_facet | United States / Supreme Court / Decision making Verfassungsrecht Stare decisis / United States Constitutional law / United States Präjudiz USA |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316412237 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT kozelrandyj settledversusrightatheoryofprecedent |