Legal reason: the use of analogy in legal argument
Legal Reason describes and explains analogical reasoning, the distinctive feature of legal argument. It challenges the prevailing view that analogical reasoning is a logically flawed, defective form of deductive reasoning. Drawing on work in epistemology and cognitive psychology, the book shows that...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
New York
Cambridge University Press
2016
|
| Ausgabe: | Second edition |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Zusammenfassung: | Legal Reason describes and explains analogical reasoning, the distinctive feature of legal argument. It challenges the prevailing view that analogical reasoning is a logically flawed, defective form of deductive reasoning. Drawing on work in epistemology and cognitive psychology, the book shows that analogical reasoning in the law is the same as that used by everyone routinely in ordinary life, and that it is a valid form of reasoning, derived from the innate human capacity to recognize the general in the particular. The use of analogical reasoning in law is dictated by the nature of law, which calls for the application of general rules to particular facts. Critiques of the first edition of the book are addressed directly and objections answered in a new chapter. Written for scholars, students, and persons interested in law, Legal Reason is written in accessible prose, with examples drawn from the law and everyday experience |
| Beschreibung: | Steamboats, broadcast transmissions, and electronic eavesdropping -- Analogical legal reasoning -- Objections -- Analogical reasoning, legal education, and the rule law |
| Beschreibung: | X, 188 pages |
| ISBN: | 9781107153462 9781316607329 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV044309616 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 170515s2016 |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9781107153462 |c Hardback |9 978-1-107-15346-2 | ||
| 020 | |a 9781316607329 |c Paperback |9 978-1-316-60732-9 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)989872486 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV044309616 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-29 | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 340/.11 | |
| 100 | 1 | |a Weinreb, Lloyd L. |d 1936- |0 (DE-588)1116440512 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Legal reason |b the use of analogy in legal argument |c Lloyd L. Weinreb, Harvard Law School |
| 250 | |a Second edition | ||
| 264 | 1 | |a New York |b Cambridge University Press |c 2016 | |
| 300 | |a X, 188 pages | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Steamboats, broadcast transmissions, and electronic eavesdropping -- Analogical legal reasoning -- Objections -- Analogical reasoning, legal education, and the rule law | ||
| 520 | |a Legal Reason describes and explains analogical reasoning, the distinctive feature of legal argument. It challenges the prevailing view that analogical reasoning is a logically flawed, defective form of deductive reasoning. Drawing on work in epistemology and cognitive psychology, the book shows that analogical reasoning in the law is the same as that used by everyone routinely in ordinary life, and that it is a valid form of reasoning, derived from the innate human capacity to recognize the general in the particular. The use of analogical reasoning in law is dictated by the nature of law, which calls for the application of general rules to particular facts. Critiques of the first edition of the book are addressed directly and objections answered in a new chapter. Written for scholars, students, and persons interested in law, Legal Reason is written in accessible prose, with examples drawn from the law and everyday experience | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Recht | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Law / Methodology | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Juristische Argumentation |0 (DE-588)4129291-1 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Analogie |0 (DE-588)4197814-6 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Juristische Methodik |0 (DE-588)4114116-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Analogie |0 (DE-588)4197814-6 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Juristische Argumentation |0 (DE-588)4129291-1 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |8 1\p |5 DE-604 | |
| 689 | 1 | 0 | |a Analogie |0 (DE-588)4197814-6 |D s |
| 689 | 1 | 1 | |a Juristische Methodik |0 (DE-588)4114116-7 |D s |
| 689 | 1 | |8 2\p |5 DE-604 | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Online-Ausgabe |z 978-1-316-59777-4 |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029713299 | ||
| 883 | 1 | |8 1\p |a cgwrk |d 20201028 |q DE-101 |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk | |
| 883 | 1 | |8 2\p |a cgwrk |d 20201028 |q DE-101 |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804177520462921728 |
|---|---|
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Weinreb, Lloyd L. 1936- |
| author_GND | (DE-588)1116440512 |
| author_facet | Weinreb, Lloyd L. 1936- |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Weinreb, Lloyd L. 1936- |
| author_variant | l l w ll llw |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV044309616 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)989872486 (DE-599)BVBBV044309616 |
| dewey-full | 340/.11 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 340 - Law |
| dewey-raw | 340/.11 |
| dewey-search | 340/.11 |
| dewey-sort | 3340 211 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| edition | Second edition |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02806nam a2200481zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV044309616</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">170515s2016 |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781107153462</subfield><subfield code="c">Hardback</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-107-15346-2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781316607329</subfield><subfield code="c">Paperback</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-316-60732-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)989872486</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV044309616</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-29</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">340/.11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Weinreb, Lloyd L.</subfield><subfield code="d">1936-</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1116440512</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Legal reason</subfield><subfield code="b">the use of analogy in legal argument</subfield><subfield code="c">Lloyd L. Weinreb, Harvard Law School</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Second edition</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">New York</subfield><subfield code="b">Cambridge University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">X, 188 pages</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Steamboats, broadcast transmissions, and electronic eavesdropping -- Analogical legal reasoning -- Objections -- Analogical reasoning, legal education, and the rule law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Legal Reason describes and explains analogical reasoning, the distinctive feature of legal argument. It challenges the prevailing view that analogical reasoning is a logically flawed, defective form of deductive reasoning. Drawing on work in epistemology and cognitive psychology, the book shows that analogical reasoning in the law is the same as that used by everyone routinely in ordinary life, and that it is a valid form of reasoning, derived from the innate human capacity to recognize the general in the particular. The use of analogical reasoning in law is dictated by the nature of law, which calls for the application of general rules to particular facts. Critiques of the first edition of the book are addressed directly and objections answered in a new chapter. Written for scholars, students, and persons interested in law, Legal Reason is written in accessible prose, with examples drawn from the law and everyday experience</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Recht</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Law / Methodology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Juristische Argumentation</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4129291-1</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Analogie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4197814-6</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Juristische Methodik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4114116-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Analogie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4197814-6</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Juristische Argumentation</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4129291-1</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Analogie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4197814-6</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Juristische Methodik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4114116-7</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">2\p</subfield><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Online-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">978-1-316-59777-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029713299</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="883" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="a">cgwrk</subfield><subfield code="d">20201028</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-101</subfield><subfield code="u">https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="883" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">2\p</subfield><subfield code="a">cgwrk</subfield><subfield code="d">20201028</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-101</subfield><subfield code="u">https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV044309616 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T07:49:23Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9781107153462 9781316607329 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029713299 |
| oclc_num | 989872486 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-29 |
| owner_facet | DE-29 |
| physical | X, 188 pages |
| publishDate | 2016 |
| publishDateSearch | 2016 |
| publishDateSort | 2016 |
| publisher | Cambridge University Press |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Weinreb, Lloyd L. 1936- (DE-588)1116440512 aut Legal reason the use of analogy in legal argument Lloyd L. Weinreb, Harvard Law School Second edition New York Cambridge University Press 2016 X, 188 pages txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Steamboats, broadcast transmissions, and electronic eavesdropping -- Analogical legal reasoning -- Objections -- Analogical reasoning, legal education, and the rule law Legal Reason describes and explains analogical reasoning, the distinctive feature of legal argument. It challenges the prevailing view that analogical reasoning is a logically flawed, defective form of deductive reasoning. Drawing on work in epistemology and cognitive psychology, the book shows that analogical reasoning in the law is the same as that used by everyone routinely in ordinary life, and that it is a valid form of reasoning, derived from the innate human capacity to recognize the general in the particular. The use of analogical reasoning in law is dictated by the nature of law, which calls for the application of general rules to particular facts. Critiques of the first edition of the book are addressed directly and objections answered in a new chapter. Written for scholars, students, and persons interested in law, Legal Reason is written in accessible prose, with examples drawn from the law and everyday experience Recht Law / Methodology Juristische Argumentation (DE-588)4129291-1 gnd rswk-swf Analogie (DE-588)4197814-6 gnd rswk-swf Juristische Methodik (DE-588)4114116-7 gnd rswk-swf Analogie (DE-588)4197814-6 s Juristische Argumentation (DE-588)4129291-1 s 1\p DE-604 Juristische Methodik (DE-588)4114116-7 s 2\p DE-604 Erscheint auch als Online-Ausgabe 978-1-316-59777-4 1\p cgwrk 20201028 DE-101 https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk 2\p cgwrk 20201028 DE-101 https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk |
| spellingShingle | Weinreb, Lloyd L. 1936- Legal reason the use of analogy in legal argument Recht Law / Methodology Juristische Argumentation (DE-588)4129291-1 gnd Analogie (DE-588)4197814-6 gnd Juristische Methodik (DE-588)4114116-7 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4129291-1 (DE-588)4197814-6 (DE-588)4114116-7 |
| title | Legal reason the use of analogy in legal argument |
| title_auth | Legal reason the use of analogy in legal argument |
| title_exact_search | Legal reason the use of analogy in legal argument |
| title_full | Legal reason the use of analogy in legal argument Lloyd L. Weinreb, Harvard Law School |
| title_fullStr | Legal reason the use of analogy in legal argument Lloyd L. Weinreb, Harvard Law School |
| title_full_unstemmed | Legal reason the use of analogy in legal argument Lloyd L. Weinreb, Harvard Law School |
| title_short | Legal reason |
| title_sort | legal reason the use of analogy in legal argument |
| title_sub | the use of analogy in legal argument |
| topic | Recht Law / Methodology Juristische Argumentation (DE-588)4129291-1 gnd Analogie (DE-588)4197814-6 gnd Juristische Methodik (DE-588)4114116-7 gnd |
| topic_facet | Recht Law / Methodology Juristische Argumentation Analogie Juristische Methodik |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT weinreblloydl legalreasontheuseofanalogyinlegalargument |