Molecular fundamentals of foam fractionation:
Foam fractionation of surfactant and protein solutions is a process dedicated to separate surface active molecules from each other due to their differences in surface activities. The process is based on forming bubbles in a certain mixed solution followed by detachment and rising of bubbles through...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Potsdam
2016
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | kostenfrei |
Zusammenfassung: | Foam fractionation of surfactant and protein solutions is a process dedicated to separate surface active molecules from each other due to their differences in surface activities. The process is based on forming bubbles in a certain mixed solution followed by detachment and rising of bubbles through a certain volume of this solution, and consequently on the formation of a foam layer on top of the solution column. Therefore, systematic analysis of this whole process comprises of at first investigations dedicated to the formation and growth of single bubbles in solutions, which is equivalent to the main principles of the well-known bubble pressure tensiometry. The second stage of the fractionation process includes the detachment of a single bubble from a pore or capillary tip and its rising in a respective aqueous solution. The third and final stage of the process is the formation and stabilization of the foam created by these bubbles, which contains the adsorption layers formed at the growing bubble surface, carried up and gets modified during the bubble rising and finally ends up as part of the foam layer. Bubble pressure tensiometry and bubble profile analysis tensiometry experiments were performed with protein solutions at different bulk concentrations, solution pH and ionic strength in order to describe the process of accumulation of protein and surfactant molecules at the bubble surface. The results obtained from the two complementary methods allow understanding the mechanism of adsorption, which is mainly governed by the diffusional transport of the adsorbing protein molecules to the bubble surface. This mechanism is the same as generally discussed for surfactant molecules. However, interesting peculiarities have been observed for protein adsorption kinetics at sufficiently short adsorption times. First of all, at short adsorption times the surface tension remains constant for a while before it decreases as expected due to the adsorption of proteins at the surface. This time interval is called induction time and it becomes shorter with increasing protein bulk concentration. Moreover, under special conditions, the surface tension does not stay constant but even increases over a certain period of time. This so-called negative surface pressure was observed for BCS and BLG and discussed for the first time in terms of changes in the surface conformation of the adsorbing protein molecules. Usually, a negative surface pressure would correspond to a negative adsorption, which is of course impossible for the studied protein solutions. The phenomenon, which amounts to some mN/m, was rather explained by simultaneous changes in the molar area required by the adsorbed proteins and the non-ideality of entropy of the interfacial layer. It is a transient phenomenon and exists only under dynamic conditions. The experiments dedicated to the local velocity of rising air bubbles in solutions were performed in a broad range of BLG concentration, pH and ionic strength. Additionally, rising bubble experiments were done for surfactant solutions in order to validate the functionality of the instrument. It turns out that the velocity of a rising bubble is much more sensitive to adsorbing molecules than classical dynamic surface tension measurements. At very low BLG or surfactant concentrations, for example, the measured local velocity profile of an air bubble is changing dramatically in time scales of seconds while dynamic surface tensions still do not show any measurable changes at this time scale. The solution’s pH and ionic strength are important parameters that govern the measured rising velocity for protein solutions. A general theoretical description of rising bubbles in surfactant and protein solutions is not available at present due to the complex situation of the adsorption process at a bubble surface in a liquid flow field with simultaneous Marangoni effects. However, instead of modelling the complete velocity profile, new theoretical work has been started to evaluate the maximum values in the profile as characteristic parameter for dynamic adsorption layers at the bubble surface more quantitatively. The studies with protein-surfactant mixtures demonstrate in an impressive way that the complexes formed by the two compounds change the surface activity as compared to the original native protein molecules and therefore lead to a completely different retardation behavior of rising bubbles. Changes in the velocity profile can be interpreted qualitatively in terms of increased or decreased surface activity of the formed protein-surfactant complexes....... |
Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (ix, 128, [8] Seiten) Illustrationen, Diagramme |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000 c 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV044268850 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 20230412 | ||
007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 170411s2016 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
024 | 7 | |a urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-94263 |2 urn | |
035 | |a (OCoLC)991564553 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)GBV867666056 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-384 |a DE-473 |a DE-703 |a DE-1051 |a DE-824 |a DE-29 |a DE-12 |a DE-91 |a DE-19 |a DE-1049 |a DE-92 |a DE-739 |a DE-898 |a DE-355 |a DE-706 |a DE-20 |a DE-1102 |a DE-860 |a DE-2174 | ||
100 | 1 | |a Ulaganathan, Vamseekrishna |d 1985- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1113611014 |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Molecular fundamentals of foam fractionation |c Vamseekrishna Ulaganathan |
246 | 1 | 3 | |a Molekulare Grundlagen der Schaumfraktionierung |
264 | 1 | |a Potsdam |c 2016 | |
300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (ix, 128, [8] Seiten) |b Illustrationen, Diagramme | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Foam fractionation of surfactant and protein solutions is a process dedicated to separate surface active molecules from each other due to their differences in surface activities. The process is based on forming bubbles in a certain mixed solution followed by detachment and rising of bubbles through a certain volume of this solution, and consequently on the formation of a foam layer on top of the solution column. Therefore, systematic analysis of this whole process comprises of at first investigations dedicated to the formation and growth of single bubbles in solutions, which is equivalent to the main principles of the well-known bubble pressure tensiometry. The second stage of the fractionation process includes the detachment of a single bubble from a pore or capillary tip and its rising in a respective aqueous solution. The third and final stage of the process is the formation and stabilization of the foam created by these bubbles, which contains the adsorption layers formed at the growing bubble surface, carried up and gets modified during the bubble rising and finally ends up as part of the foam layer. | ||
520 | |a Bubble pressure tensiometry and bubble profile analysis tensiometry experiments were performed with protein solutions at different bulk concentrations, solution pH and ionic strength in order to describe the process of accumulation of protein and surfactant molecules at the bubble surface. The results obtained from the two complementary methods allow understanding the mechanism of adsorption, which is mainly governed by the diffusional transport of the adsorbing protein molecules to the bubble surface. This mechanism is the same as generally discussed for surfactant molecules. However, interesting peculiarities have been observed for protein adsorption kinetics at sufficiently short adsorption times. First of all, at short adsorption times the surface tension remains constant for a while before it decreases as expected due to the adsorption of proteins at the surface. This time interval is called induction time and it becomes shorter with increasing protein bulk concentration. Moreover, under special conditions, the surface tension does not stay constant but even increases over a certain period of time. This so-called negative surface pressure was observed for BCS and BLG and discussed for the first time in terms of changes in the surface conformation of the adsorbing protein molecules. Usually, a negative surface pressure would correspond to a negative adsorption, which is of course impossible for the studied protein solutions. The phenomenon, which amounts to some mN/m, was rather explained by simultaneous changes in the molar area required by the adsorbed proteins and the non-ideality of entropy of the interfacial layer. It is a transient phenomenon and exists only under dynamic conditions. | ||
520 | |a The experiments dedicated to the local velocity of rising air bubbles in solutions were performed in a broad range of BLG concentration, pH and ionic strength. Additionally, rising bubble experiments were done for surfactant solutions in order to validate the functionality of the instrument. It turns out that the velocity of a rising bubble is much more sensitive to adsorbing molecules than classical dynamic surface tension measurements. At very low BLG or surfactant concentrations, for example, the measured local velocity profile of an air bubble is changing dramatically in time scales of seconds while dynamic surface tensions still do not show any measurable changes at this time scale. The solution’s pH and ionic strength are important parameters that govern the measured rising velocity for protein solutions. A general theoretical description of rising bubbles in surfactant and protein solutions is not available at present due to the complex situation of the adsorption process at a bubble surface in a liquid flow field with simultaneous Marangoni effects. However, instead of modelling the complete velocity profile, new theoretical work has been started to evaluate the maximum values in the profile as characteristic parameter for dynamic adsorption layers at the bubble surface more quantitatively. The studies with protein-surfactant mixtures demonstrate in an impressive way that the complexes formed by the two compounds change the surface activity as compared to the original native protein molecules and therefore lead to a completely different retardation behavior of rising bubbles. Changes in the velocity profile can be interpreted qualitatively in terms of increased or decreased surface activity of the formed protein-surfactant complexes....... | ||
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Antischaummittel |0 (DE-588)4179434-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
689 | 0 | 0 | |a Antischaummittel |0 (DE-588)4179434-5 |D s |
689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
700 | 1 | |a Brezesinski, Gerald |4 dgs | |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-94263 |x Resolving-System |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
912 | |a ebook | ||
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029673516 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804177451219156992 |
---|---|
any_adam_object | |
author | Ulaganathan, Vamseekrishna 1985- |
author_GND | (DE-588)1113611014 |
author_facet | Ulaganathan, Vamseekrishna 1985- |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Ulaganathan, Vamseekrishna 1985- |
author_variant | v u vu |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV044268850 |
collection | ebook |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)991564553 (DE-599)GBV867666056 |
format | Electronic eBook |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>06010nmm a2200373 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV044268850</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230412 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">170411s2016 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-94263</subfield><subfield code="2">urn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)991564553</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBV867666056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-384</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-703</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1051</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-824</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-29</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-91</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1049</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-92</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-898</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-355</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-706</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-20</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1102</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-860</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-2174</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ulaganathan, Vamseekrishna</subfield><subfield code="d">1985-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1113611014</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Molecular fundamentals of foam fractionation</subfield><subfield code="c">Vamseekrishna Ulaganathan</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="246" ind1="1" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Molekulare Grundlagen der Schaumfraktionierung</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Potsdam</subfield><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (ix, 128, [8] Seiten)</subfield><subfield code="b">Illustrationen, Diagramme</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Foam fractionation of surfactant and protein solutions is a process dedicated to separate surface active molecules from each other due to their differences in surface activities. The process is based on forming bubbles in a certain mixed solution followed by detachment and rising of bubbles through a certain volume of this solution, and consequently on the formation of a foam layer on top of the solution column. Therefore, systematic analysis of this whole process comprises of at first investigations dedicated to the formation and growth of single bubbles in solutions, which is equivalent to the main principles of the well-known bubble pressure tensiometry. The second stage of the fractionation process includes the detachment of a single bubble from a pore or capillary tip and its rising in a respective aqueous solution. The third and final stage of the process is the formation and stabilization of the foam created by these bubbles, which contains the adsorption layers formed at the growing bubble surface, carried up and gets modified during the bubble rising and finally ends up as part of the foam layer.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bubble pressure tensiometry and bubble profile analysis tensiometry experiments were performed with protein solutions at different bulk concentrations, solution pH and ionic strength in order to describe the process of accumulation of protein and surfactant molecules at the bubble surface. The results obtained from the two complementary methods allow understanding the mechanism of adsorption, which is mainly governed by the diffusional transport of the adsorbing protein molecules to the bubble surface. This mechanism is the same as generally discussed for surfactant molecules. However, interesting peculiarities have been observed for protein adsorption kinetics at sufficiently short adsorption times. First of all, at short adsorption times the surface tension remains constant for a while before it decreases as expected due to the adsorption of proteins at the surface. This time interval is called induction time and it becomes shorter with increasing protein bulk concentration. Moreover, under special conditions, the surface tension does not stay constant but even increases over a certain period of time. This so-called negative surface pressure was observed for BCS and BLG and discussed for the first time in terms of changes in the surface conformation of the adsorbing protein molecules. Usually, a negative surface pressure would correspond to a negative adsorption, which is of course impossible for the studied protein solutions. The phenomenon, which amounts to some mN/m, was rather explained by simultaneous changes in the molar area required by the adsorbed proteins and the non-ideality of entropy of the interfacial layer. It is a transient phenomenon and exists only under dynamic conditions.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The experiments dedicated to the local velocity of rising air bubbles in solutions were performed in a broad range of BLG concentration, pH and ionic strength. Additionally, rising bubble experiments were done for surfactant solutions in order to validate the functionality of the instrument. It turns out that the velocity of a rising bubble is much more sensitive to adsorbing molecules than classical dynamic surface tension measurements. At very low BLG or surfactant concentrations, for example, the measured local velocity profile of an air bubble is changing dramatically in time scales of seconds while dynamic surface tensions still do not show any measurable changes at this time scale. The solution’s pH and ionic strength are important parameters that govern the measured rising velocity for protein solutions. A general theoretical description of rising bubbles in surfactant and protein solutions is not available at present due to the complex situation of the adsorption process at a bubble surface in a liquid flow field with simultaneous Marangoni effects. However, instead of modelling the complete velocity profile, new theoretical work has been started to evaluate the maximum values in the profile as characteristic parameter for dynamic adsorption layers at the bubble surface more quantitatively. The studies with protein-surfactant mixtures demonstrate in an impressive way that the complexes formed by the two compounds change the surface activity as compared to the original native protein molecules and therefore lead to a completely different retardation behavior of rising bubbles. Changes in the velocity profile can be interpreted qualitatively in terms of increased or decreased surface activity of the formed protein-surfactant complexes.......</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Antischaummittel</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4179434-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Antischaummittel</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4179434-5</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Brezesinski, Gerald</subfield><subfield code="4">dgs</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-94263</subfield><subfield code="x">Resolving-System</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ebook</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029673516</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV044268850 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-07-10T07:48:17Z |
institution | BVB |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029673516 |
oclc_num | 991564553 |
open_access_boolean | 1 |
owner | DE-384 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-703 DE-1051 DE-824 DE-29 DE-12 DE-91 DE-BY-TUM DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-1049 DE-92 DE-739 DE-898 DE-BY-UBR DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-706 DE-20 DE-1102 DE-860 DE-2174 |
owner_facet | DE-384 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-703 DE-1051 DE-824 DE-29 DE-12 DE-91 DE-BY-TUM DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-1049 DE-92 DE-739 DE-898 DE-BY-UBR DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-706 DE-20 DE-1102 DE-860 DE-2174 |
physical | 1 Online-Ressource (ix, 128, [8] Seiten) Illustrationen, Diagramme |
psigel | ebook |
publishDate | 2016 |
publishDateSearch | 2016 |
publishDateSort | 2016 |
record_format | marc |
spelling | Ulaganathan, Vamseekrishna 1985- Verfasser (DE-588)1113611014 aut Molecular fundamentals of foam fractionation Vamseekrishna Ulaganathan Molekulare Grundlagen der Schaumfraktionierung Potsdam 2016 1 Online-Ressource (ix, 128, [8] Seiten) Illustrationen, Diagramme txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Foam fractionation of surfactant and protein solutions is a process dedicated to separate surface active molecules from each other due to their differences in surface activities. The process is based on forming bubbles in a certain mixed solution followed by detachment and rising of bubbles through a certain volume of this solution, and consequently on the formation of a foam layer on top of the solution column. Therefore, systematic analysis of this whole process comprises of at first investigations dedicated to the formation and growth of single bubbles in solutions, which is equivalent to the main principles of the well-known bubble pressure tensiometry. The second stage of the fractionation process includes the detachment of a single bubble from a pore or capillary tip and its rising in a respective aqueous solution. The third and final stage of the process is the formation and stabilization of the foam created by these bubbles, which contains the adsorption layers formed at the growing bubble surface, carried up and gets modified during the bubble rising and finally ends up as part of the foam layer. Bubble pressure tensiometry and bubble profile analysis tensiometry experiments were performed with protein solutions at different bulk concentrations, solution pH and ionic strength in order to describe the process of accumulation of protein and surfactant molecules at the bubble surface. The results obtained from the two complementary methods allow understanding the mechanism of adsorption, which is mainly governed by the diffusional transport of the adsorbing protein molecules to the bubble surface. This mechanism is the same as generally discussed for surfactant molecules. However, interesting peculiarities have been observed for protein adsorption kinetics at sufficiently short adsorption times. First of all, at short adsorption times the surface tension remains constant for a while before it decreases as expected due to the adsorption of proteins at the surface. This time interval is called induction time and it becomes shorter with increasing protein bulk concentration. Moreover, under special conditions, the surface tension does not stay constant but even increases over a certain period of time. This so-called negative surface pressure was observed for BCS and BLG and discussed for the first time in terms of changes in the surface conformation of the adsorbing protein molecules. Usually, a negative surface pressure would correspond to a negative adsorption, which is of course impossible for the studied protein solutions. The phenomenon, which amounts to some mN/m, was rather explained by simultaneous changes in the molar area required by the adsorbed proteins and the non-ideality of entropy of the interfacial layer. It is a transient phenomenon and exists only under dynamic conditions. The experiments dedicated to the local velocity of rising air bubbles in solutions were performed in a broad range of BLG concentration, pH and ionic strength. Additionally, rising bubble experiments were done for surfactant solutions in order to validate the functionality of the instrument. It turns out that the velocity of a rising bubble is much more sensitive to adsorbing molecules than classical dynamic surface tension measurements. At very low BLG or surfactant concentrations, for example, the measured local velocity profile of an air bubble is changing dramatically in time scales of seconds while dynamic surface tensions still do not show any measurable changes at this time scale. The solution’s pH and ionic strength are important parameters that govern the measured rising velocity for protein solutions. A general theoretical description of rising bubbles in surfactant and protein solutions is not available at present due to the complex situation of the adsorption process at a bubble surface in a liquid flow field with simultaneous Marangoni effects. However, instead of modelling the complete velocity profile, new theoretical work has been started to evaluate the maximum values in the profile as characteristic parameter for dynamic adsorption layers at the bubble surface more quantitatively. The studies with protein-surfactant mixtures demonstrate in an impressive way that the complexes formed by the two compounds change the surface activity as compared to the original native protein molecules and therefore lead to a completely different retardation behavior of rising bubbles. Changes in the velocity profile can be interpreted qualitatively in terms of increased or decreased surface activity of the formed protein-surfactant complexes....... Antischaummittel (DE-588)4179434-5 gnd rswk-swf Antischaummittel (DE-588)4179434-5 s DE-604 Brezesinski, Gerald dgs https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-94263 Resolving-System kostenfrei Volltext |
spellingShingle | Ulaganathan, Vamseekrishna 1985- Molecular fundamentals of foam fractionation Antischaummittel (DE-588)4179434-5 gnd |
subject_GND | (DE-588)4179434-5 |
title | Molecular fundamentals of foam fractionation |
title_alt | Molekulare Grundlagen der Schaumfraktionierung |
title_auth | Molecular fundamentals of foam fractionation |
title_exact_search | Molecular fundamentals of foam fractionation |
title_full | Molecular fundamentals of foam fractionation Vamseekrishna Ulaganathan |
title_fullStr | Molecular fundamentals of foam fractionation Vamseekrishna Ulaganathan |
title_full_unstemmed | Molecular fundamentals of foam fractionation Vamseekrishna Ulaganathan |
title_short | Molecular fundamentals of foam fractionation |
title_sort | molecular fundamentals of foam fractionation |
topic | Antischaummittel (DE-588)4179434-5 gnd |
topic_facet | Antischaummittel |
url | https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-94263 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ulaganathanvamseekrishna molecularfundamentalsoffoamfractionation AT brezesinskigerald molecularfundamentalsoffoamfractionation AT ulaganathanvamseekrishna molekularegrundlagenderschaumfraktionierung AT brezesinskigerald molekularegrundlagenderschaumfraktionierung |