Constitutional Originalism: A Debate
Problems of constitutional interpretation have many faces, but much of the contemporary discussion has focused on what has come to be called "originalism." The core of originalism is the belief that fidelity to the original understanding of the Constitution should constrain contemporary ju...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Ithaca, N.Y.
Cornell University Press
[2011]
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | FHA01 FKE01 FLA01 UBG01 UPA01 FAW01 FAB01 FCO01 Volltext |
| Zusammenfassung: | Problems of constitutional interpretation have many faces, but much of the contemporary discussion has focused on what has come to be called "originalism." The core of originalism is the belief that fidelity to the original understanding of the Constitution should constrain contemporary judges. As originalist thinking has evolved, it has become clear that there is a family of originalist theories, some emphasizing the intent of the framers, while others focus on the original public meaning of the constitutional text. This idea has enjoyed a modern resurgence, in good part in reaction to the assumption of more sweeping power by the judiciary, operating in the name of constitutional interpretation. Those arguing for a "living Constitution" that keeps up with a changing world and changing values have resisted originalism. This difference in legal philosophy and jurisprudence has, since the 1970s, spilled over into party politics and the partisan wrangling over court appointments from appellate courts to the Supreme Court.In Constitutional Originalism, Robert W. Bennett and Lawrence B. Solum elucidate the two sides of this debate and mediate between them in order to separate differences that are real from those that are only apparent. In a thorough exploration of the range of contemporary views on originalism, the authors articulate and defend sharply contrasting positions. Solum brings learning from the philosophy of language to his argument in favor of originalism, and Bennett highlights interpretational problems in the dispute-resolution context, describing instances in which a living Constitution is a more feasible and productive position. The book explores those contrasting positions, to be sure, but also uncovers important points of agreement for the interpretational enterprise. This provocative and absorbing book ends with a bibliographic essay that points to landmark works in the field and helps lay readers and s |
| Beschreibung: | Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed Feb. 24, 2017) |
| Beschreibung: | 1 online resource |
| ISBN: | 9780801460630 |
| DOI: | 10.7591/9780801460630 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV044255370 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20180322 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 170403s2011 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9780801460630 |9 978-0-8014-6063-0 | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.7591/9780801460630 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (ZDB-23-DGG)9780801460630 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1165557234 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV044255370 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-Aug4 |a DE-859 |a DE-860 |a DE-473 |a DE-739 |a DE-1046 |a DE-1043 |a DE-858 | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 342.73 |2 23 | |
| 100 | 1 | |a Bennett, Robert W. |d 1941- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)124848893 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Constitutional Originalism |b A Debate |c Lawrence B. Solum, Robert W. Bennett |
| 264 | 1 | |a Ithaca, N.Y. |b Cornell University Press |c [2011] | |
| 264 | 4 | |c © 2011 | |
| 300 | |a 1 online resource | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed Feb. 24, 2017) | ||
| 520 | |a Problems of constitutional interpretation have many faces, but much of the contemporary discussion has focused on what has come to be called "originalism." The core of originalism is the belief that fidelity to the original understanding of the Constitution should constrain contemporary judges. As originalist thinking has evolved, it has become clear that there is a family of originalist theories, some emphasizing the intent of the framers, while others focus on the original public meaning of the constitutional text. This idea has enjoyed a modern resurgence, in good part in reaction to the assumption of more sweeping power by the judiciary, operating in the name of constitutional interpretation. Those arguing for a "living Constitution" that keeps up with a changing world and changing values have resisted originalism. This difference in legal philosophy and jurisprudence has, since the 1970s, spilled over into party politics and the partisan wrangling over court appointments from appellate courts to the Supreme Court.In Constitutional Originalism, Robert W. Bennett and Lawrence B. Solum elucidate the two sides of this debate and mediate between them in order to separate differences that are real from those that are only apparent. In a thorough exploration of the range of contemporary views on originalism, the authors articulate and defend sharply contrasting positions. Solum brings learning from the philosophy of language to his argument in favor of originalism, and Bennett highlights interpretational problems in the dispute-resolution context, describing instances in which a living Constitution is a more feasible and productive position. The book explores those contrasting positions, to be sure, but also uncovers important points of agreement for the interpretational enterprise. This provocative and absorbing book ends with a bibliographic essay that points to landmark works in the field and helps lay readers and s | ||
| 546 | |a In English | ||
| 610 | 2 | 7 | |a USA |t The United States Constitution |0 (DE-588)4133001-8 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 4 | |a Verfassungsrecht | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Constitutional law |z United States | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Verfassungstheorie |0 (DE-588)4127485-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Verfassungsauslegung |0 (DE-588)4187678-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 4 | |a USA | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a USA |t The United States Constitution |0 (DE-588)4133001-8 |D u |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Verfassungstheorie |0 (DE-588)4127485-4 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Verfassungsauslegung |0 (DE-588)4187678-7 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |8 1\p |5 DE-604 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Solum, Lawrence B. |e Sonstige |0 (DE-588)1016249705 |4 oth | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.7591/9780801460630 |x Verlag |z URL des Erstveröffentlichers |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a ZDB-23-DGG | ||
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029660394 | ||
| 883 | 1 | |8 1\p |a cgwrk |d 20201028 |q DE-101 |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.7591/9780801460630 |l FHA01 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q FHA_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.7591/9780801460630 |l FKE01 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q FKE_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.7591/9780801460630 |l FLA01 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q FLA_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.7591/9780801460630 |l UBG01 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q UBG_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.7591/9780801460630 |l UPA01 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q UPA_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.7591/9780801460630 |l FAW01 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q FAW_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.7591/9780801460630 |l FAB01 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q FAB_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.7591/9780801460630 |l FCO01 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q FCO_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804177426976079872 |
|---|---|
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Bennett, Robert W. 1941- |
| author_GND | (DE-588)124848893 (DE-588)1016249705 |
| author_facet | Bennett, Robert W. 1941- |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Bennett, Robert W. 1941- |
| author_variant | r w b rw rwb |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV044255370 |
| collection | ZDB-23-DGG |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-23-DGG)9780801460630 (OCoLC)1165557234 (DE-599)BVBBV044255370 |
| dewey-full | 342.73 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 342 - Constitutional and administrative law |
| dewey-raw | 342.73 |
| dewey-search | 342.73 |
| dewey-sort | 3342.73 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| doi_str_mv | 10.7591/9780801460630 |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>04773nmm a2200601zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV044255370</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20180322 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">170403s2011 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780801460630</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-8014-6063-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.7591/9780801460630</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-23-DGG)9780801460630</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1165557234</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV044255370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-Aug4</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-859</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-860</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1046</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1043</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-858</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">342.73</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bennett, Robert W.</subfield><subfield code="d">1941-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)124848893</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Constitutional Originalism</subfield><subfield code="b">A Debate</subfield><subfield code="c">Lawrence B. Solum, Robert W. Bennett</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Ithaca, N.Y.</subfield><subfield code="b">Cornell University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">[2011]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="c">© 2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed Feb. 24, 2017)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Problems of constitutional interpretation have many faces, but much of the contemporary discussion has focused on what has come to be called "originalism." The core of originalism is the belief that fidelity to the original understanding of the Constitution should constrain contemporary judges. As originalist thinking has evolved, it has become clear that there is a family of originalist theories, some emphasizing the intent of the framers, while others focus on the original public meaning of the constitutional text. This idea has enjoyed a modern resurgence, in good part in reaction to the assumption of more sweeping power by the judiciary, operating in the name of constitutional interpretation. Those arguing for a "living Constitution" that keeps up with a changing world and changing values have resisted originalism. This difference in legal philosophy and jurisprudence has, since the 1970s, spilled over into party politics and the partisan wrangling over court appointments from appellate courts to the Supreme Court.In Constitutional Originalism, Robert W. Bennett and Lawrence B. Solum elucidate the two sides of this debate and mediate between them in order to separate differences that are real from those that are only apparent. In a thorough exploration of the range of contemporary views on originalism, the authors articulate and defend sharply contrasting positions. Solum brings learning from the philosophy of language to his argument in favor of originalism, and Bennett highlights interpretational problems in the dispute-resolution context, describing instances in which a living Constitution is a more feasible and productive position. The book explores those contrasting positions, to be sure, but also uncovers important points of agreement for the interpretational enterprise. This provocative and absorbing book ends with a bibliographic essay that points to landmark works in the field and helps lay readers and s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="546" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In English</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="t">The United States Constitution</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4133001-8</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Verfassungsrecht</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Constitutional law</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Verfassungstheorie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4127485-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Verfassungsauslegung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4187678-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="t">The United States Constitution</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4133001-8</subfield><subfield code="D">u</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Verfassungstheorie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4127485-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Verfassungsauslegung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4187678-7</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Solum, Lawrence B.</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1016249705</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.7591/9780801460630</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">URL des Erstveröffentlichers</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029660394</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="883" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="a">cgwrk</subfield><subfield code="d">20201028</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-101</subfield><subfield code="u">https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.7591/9780801460630</subfield><subfield code="l">FHA01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">FHA_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.7591/9780801460630</subfield><subfield code="l">FKE01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">FKE_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.7591/9780801460630</subfield><subfield code="l">FLA01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">FLA_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.7591/9780801460630</subfield><subfield code="l">UBG01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">UBG_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.7591/9780801460630</subfield><subfield code="l">UPA01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">UPA_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.7591/9780801460630</subfield><subfield code="l">FAW01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">FAW_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.7591/9780801460630</subfield><subfield code="l">FAB01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">FAB_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.7591/9780801460630</subfield><subfield code="l">FCO01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">FCO_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | USA |
| geographic_facet | USA |
| id | DE-604.BV044255370 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T07:47:54Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9780801460630 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029660394 |
| oclc_num | 1165557234 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-Aug4 DE-859 DE-860 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-739 DE-1046 DE-1043 DE-858 |
| owner_facet | DE-Aug4 DE-859 DE-860 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-739 DE-1046 DE-1043 DE-858 |
| physical | 1 online resource |
| psigel | ZDB-23-DGG ZDB-23-DGG FHA_PDA_DGG ZDB-23-DGG FKE_PDA_DGG ZDB-23-DGG FLA_PDA_DGG ZDB-23-DGG UBG_PDA_DGG ZDB-23-DGG UPA_PDA_DGG ZDB-23-DGG FAW_PDA_DGG ZDB-23-DGG FAB_PDA_DGG ZDB-23-DGG FCO_PDA_DGG |
| publishDate | 2011 |
| publishDateSearch | 2011 |
| publishDateSort | 2011 |
| publisher | Cornell University Press |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Bennett, Robert W. 1941- Verfasser (DE-588)124848893 aut Constitutional Originalism A Debate Lawrence B. Solum, Robert W. Bennett Ithaca, N.Y. Cornell University Press [2011] © 2011 1 online resource txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed Feb. 24, 2017) Problems of constitutional interpretation have many faces, but much of the contemporary discussion has focused on what has come to be called "originalism." The core of originalism is the belief that fidelity to the original understanding of the Constitution should constrain contemporary judges. As originalist thinking has evolved, it has become clear that there is a family of originalist theories, some emphasizing the intent of the framers, while others focus on the original public meaning of the constitutional text. This idea has enjoyed a modern resurgence, in good part in reaction to the assumption of more sweeping power by the judiciary, operating in the name of constitutional interpretation. Those arguing for a "living Constitution" that keeps up with a changing world and changing values have resisted originalism. This difference in legal philosophy and jurisprudence has, since the 1970s, spilled over into party politics and the partisan wrangling over court appointments from appellate courts to the Supreme Court.In Constitutional Originalism, Robert W. Bennett and Lawrence B. Solum elucidate the two sides of this debate and mediate between them in order to separate differences that are real from those that are only apparent. In a thorough exploration of the range of contemporary views on originalism, the authors articulate and defend sharply contrasting positions. Solum brings learning from the philosophy of language to his argument in favor of originalism, and Bennett highlights interpretational problems in the dispute-resolution context, describing instances in which a living Constitution is a more feasible and productive position. The book explores those contrasting positions, to be sure, but also uncovers important points of agreement for the interpretational enterprise. This provocative and absorbing book ends with a bibliographic essay that points to landmark works in the field and helps lay readers and s In English USA The United States Constitution (DE-588)4133001-8 gnd rswk-swf Verfassungsrecht Constitutional law United States Verfassungstheorie (DE-588)4127485-4 gnd rswk-swf Verfassungsauslegung (DE-588)4187678-7 gnd rswk-swf USA USA The United States Constitution (DE-588)4133001-8 u Verfassungstheorie (DE-588)4127485-4 s Verfassungsauslegung (DE-588)4187678-7 s 1\p DE-604 Solum, Lawrence B. Sonstige (DE-588)1016249705 oth https://doi.org/10.7591/9780801460630 Verlag URL des Erstveröffentlichers Volltext 1\p cgwrk 20201028 DE-101 https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk |
| spellingShingle | Bennett, Robert W. 1941- Constitutional Originalism A Debate USA The United States Constitution (DE-588)4133001-8 gnd Verfassungsrecht Constitutional law United States Verfassungstheorie (DE-588)4127485-4 gnd Verfassungsauslegung (DE-588)4187678-7 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4133001-8 (DE-588)4127485-4 (DE-588)4187678-7 |
| title | Constitutional Originalism A Debate |
| title_auth | Constitutional Originalism A Debate |
| title_exact_search | Constitutional Originalism A Debate |
| title_full | Constitutional Originalism A Debate Lawrence B. Solum, Robert W. Bennett |
| title_fullStr | Constitutional Originalism A Debate Lawrence B. Solum, Robert W. Bennett |
| title_full_unstemmed | Constitutional Originalism A Debate Lawrence B. Solum, Robert W. Bennett |
| title_short | Constitutional Originalism |
| title_sort | constitutional originalism a debate |
| title_sub | A Debate |
| topic | USA The United States Constitution (DE-588)4133001-8 gnd Verfassungsrecht Constitutional law United States Verfassungstheorie (DE-588)4127485-4 gnd Verfassungsauslegung (DE-588)4187678-7 gnd |
| topic_facet | USA The United States Constitution Verfassungsrecht Constitutional law United States Verfassungstheorie Verfassungsauslegung USA |
| url | https://doi.org/10.7591/9780801460630 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT bennettrobertw constitutionaloriginalismadebate AT solumlawrenceb constitutionaloriginalismadebate |