Logic, form, and grammar:
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
London
Routledge
2001
|
| Schriftenreihe: | International library of philosophy
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | KUBA1 |
| Beschreibung: | Includes bibliographical references (p. [107]-[110]) "We frequently use hypotheticals in our arguments with the common sense assertion that they are a logical form. "If I pass my exams then I will be able to continue my studies. I passed my exams therefore I will be continuing my studies". The conclusion of such an argument is clearly inferred from the hypothetical. Yet hypotheticals are one of the long-standing problems in the study of logic: the claim that they fall under the logical form has never been proven. So how then can logic claim to be the science of formal inference? Peter Long resolves these difficulties and others, and challenges traditional thinking in the area. In addition to his essay on hypotheticals, this study also contains two essays concerned with classical problems in philosophical logic, relating to notions of logical form and formal relations. How do we relate a thing with having a property as in "This sheet is white" or of the proposition "London is north of Paris", where this is an expression of a relation to a relation?" |
| Beschreibung: | x, 110 p |
| ISBN: | 0203470974 041524224X |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV044076036 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 170217s2001 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 0203470974 |9 0-203-47097-4 | ||
| 020 | |a 041524224X |9 0-415-24224-X | ||
| 035 | |a (ZDB-30-PAD)EBC167103 | ||
| 035 | |a (ZDB-89-EBL)EBL167103 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)52098716 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV044076036 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-Y3 | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 160 |2 21 | |
| 100 | 1 | |a Long, Peter |d 1926- |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Logic, form, and grammar |c Peter Long |
| 264 | 1 | |a London |b Routledge |c 2001 | |
| 300 | |a x, 110 p | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a International library of philosophy | |
| 500 | |a Includes bibliographical references (p. [107]-[110]) | ||
| 500 | |a "We frequently use hypotheticals in our arguments with the common sense assertion that they are a logical form. "If I pass my exams then I will be able to continue my studies. I passed my exams therefore I will be continuing my studies". The conclusion of such an argument is clearly inferred from the hypothetical. Yet hypotheticals are one of the long-standing problems in the study of logic: the claim that they fall under the logical form has never been proven. So how then can logic claim to be the science of formal inference? Peter Long resolves these difficulties and others, and challenges traditional thinking in the area. In addition to his essay on hypotheticals, this study also contains two essays concerned with classical problems in philosophical logic, relating to notions of logical form and formal relations. How do we relate a thing with having a property as in "This sheet is white" or of the proposition "London is north of Paris", where this is an expression of a relation to a relation?" | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Form (Logic) | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Logic | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Form |g Logik |0 (DE-588)4154988-0 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Form |g Logik |0 (DE-588)4154988-0 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |8 1\p |5 DE-604 | |
| 912 | |a ZDB-30-PAD | ||
| 940 | 1 | |q KUBA1-ZDB-30-PAD-2023 | |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029482881 | ||
| 883 | 1 | |8 1\p |a cgwrk |d 20201028 |q DE-101 |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk | |
| 966 | e | |u https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/khifiit/detail.action?docID=167103 |l KUBA1 |p ZDB-30-PAD |q KHI |x Aggregator |3 Volltext | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804177114477363200 |
|---|---|
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Long, Peter 1926- |
| author_facet | Long, Peter 1926- |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Long, Peter 1926- |
| author_variant | p l pl |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV044076036 |
| collection | ZDB-30-PAD |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-30-PAD)EBC167103 (ZDB-89-EBL)EBL167103 (OCoLC)52098716 (DE-599)BVBBV044076036 |
| dewey-full | 160 |
| dewey-hundreds | 100 - Philosophy & psychology |
| dewey-ones | 160 - Philosophical logic |
| dewey-raw | 160 |
| dewey-search | 160 |
| dewey-sort | 3160 |
| dewey-tens | 160 - Philosophical logic |
| discipline | Philosophie |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02448nmm a2200445zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV044076036</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">170217s2001 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">0203470974</subfield><subfield code="9">0-203-47097-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">041524224X</subfield><subfield code="9">0-415-24224-X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-30-PAD)EBC167103</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-89-EBL)EBL167103</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)52098716</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV044076036</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-Y3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">160</subfield><subfield code="2">21</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Long, Peter</subfield><subfield code="d">1926-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Logic, form, and grammar</subfield><subfield code="c">Peter Long</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">London</subfield><subfield code="b">Routledge</subfield><subfield code="c">2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">x, 110 p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">International library of philosophy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references (p. [107]-[110])</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"We frequently use hypotheticals in our arguments with the common sense assertion that they are a logical form. "If I pass my exams then I will be able to continue my studies. I passed my exams therefore I will be continuing my studies". The conclusion of such an argument is clearly inferred from the hypothetical. Yet hypotheticals are one of the long-standing problems in the study of logic: the claim that they fall under the logical form has never been proven. So how then can logic claim to be the science of formal inference? Peter Long resolves these difficulties and others, and challenges traditional thinking in the area. In addition to his essay on hypotheticals, this study also contains two essays concerned with classical problems in philosophical logic, relating to notions of logical form and formal relations. How do we relate a thing with having a property as in "This sheet is white" or of the proposition "London is north of Paris", where this is an expression of a relation to a relation?"</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Form (Logic)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Logic</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Form</subfield><subfield code="g">Logik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4154988-0</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Form</subfield><subfield code="g">Logik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4154988-0</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-30-PAD</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">KUBA1-ZDB-30-PAD-2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029482881</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="883" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="a">cgwrk</subfield><subfield code="d">20201028</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-101</subfield><subfield code="u">https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/khifiit/detail.action?docID=167103</subfield><subfield code="l">KUBA1</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-30-PAD</subfield><subfield code="q">KHI</subfield><subfield code="x">Aggregator</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV044076036 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T07:42:56Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 0203470974 041524224X |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029482881 |
| oclc_num | 52098716 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-Y3 |
| owner_facet | DE-Y3 |
| physical | x, 110 p |
| psigel | ZDB-30-PAD KUBA1-ZDB-30-PAD-2023 ZDB-30-PAD KHI |
| publishDate | 2001 |
| publishDateSearch | 2001 |
| publishDateSort | 2001 |
| publisher | Routledge |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | International library of philosophy |
| spelling | Long, Peter 1926- Verfasser aut Logic, form, and grammar Peter Long London Routledge 2001 x, 110 p txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier International library of philosophy Includes bibliographical references (p. [107]-[110]) "We frequently use hypotheticals in our arguments with the common sense assertion that they are a logical form. "If I pass my exams then I will be able to continue my studies. I passed my exams therefore I will be continuing my studies". The conclusion of such an argument is clearly inferred from the hypothetical. Yet hypotheticals are one of the long-standing problems in the study of logic: the claim that they fall under the logical form has never been proven. So how then can logic claim to be the science of formal inference? Peter Long resolves these difficulties and others, and challenges traditional thinking in the area. In addition to his essay on hypotheticals, this study also contains two essays concerned with classical problems in philosophical logic, relating to notions of logical form and formal relations. How do we relate a thing with having a property as in "This sheet is white" or of the proposition "London is north of Paris", where this is an expression of a relation to a relation?" Form (Logic) Logic Form Logik (DE-588)4154988-0 gnd rswk-swf Form Logik (DE-588)4154988-0 s 1\p DE-604 1\p cgwrk 20201028 DE-101 https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk |
| spellingShingle | Long, Peter 1926- Logic, form, and grammar Form (Logic) Logic Form Logik (DE-588)4154988-0 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4154988-0 |
| title | Logic, form, and grammar |
| title_auth | Logic, form, and grammar |
| title_exact_search | Logic, form, and grammar |
| title_full | Logic, form, and grammar Peter Long |
| title_fullStr | Logic, form, and grammar Peter Long |
| title_full_unstemmed | Logic, form, and grammar Peter Long |
| title_short | Logic, form, and grammar |
| title_sort | logic form and grammar |
| topic | Form (Logic) Logic Form Logik (DE-588)4154988-0 gnd |
| topic_facet | Form (Logic) Logic Form Logik |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT longpeter logicformandgrammar |