Clinical Governance and Leadership:
research-base for CG is gradually building, providing a strong rationale for making it a founding principle for any health system or service provider organisation. Studies have demonstrated links between clinically-led organisations and superior performances on quality of care and financial indicato...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Bingley
Emerald Group Publishing Limited
2015
|
Schriftenreihe: | Journal of Health Organization and Management : Volume 29, Issue 4
|
Zusammenfassung: | research-base for CG is gradually building, providing a strong rationale for making it a founding principle for any health system or service provider organisation. Studies have demonstrated links between clinically-led organisations and superior performances on quality of care and financial indicators.Yet despite its importance, CG remains under-researched when compared with other core policy issues facing today's health systems. There remain questions around how CG is defined and what exactly its scope is, leading some to question what the focus of it should be, how it should be designed and implemented, and health professionals themselves demanding more specific information. It could even be suggested that CG is a 'fuzzy' management concept; that without crucial detail on the structures which should be aimed for, or the roles that should be created in a health system to support CG, it will always be challenging building clinically-governed organisations. Furthermore, each organisation could end up building its own version of CG, possibly repeating mistakes made elsewhere. We, therefore, need more research into what works and why.Questions also abound around how to measure CG and leadership. Various studies have looked at components of assessment, largely deploying qualitative and case study methods, although some have also sought to quantify developmental progress across different health organisations. Some studies have developed frameworks for assessing different dimensions of CG. There are also various self-assessment tools. The divergence in approaches may be expected in a field of management and organisational research but also points to another important gap. This is the need for improved methods for researching CG, especially the approaches and tools which might be used for this, along with broader agreement on these |
Beschreibung: | Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources |
Beschreibung: | 1 online resource (111 pages) |
ISBN: | 9781785603716 9781785603709 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV044051576 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 170217s2015 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
020 | |a 9781785603716 |9 978-1-78560-371-6 | ||
020 | |a 9781785603709 |c Print |9 978-1-78560-370-9 | ||
035 | |a (ZDB-30-PAD)EBC2093101 | ||
035 | |a (ZDB-89-EBL)EBL2093101 | ||
035 | |a (ZDB-38-EBR)ebr11077153 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)921278986 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV044051576 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
082 | 0 | |a 610.6 | |
100 | 1 | |a Gauld, Robin |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Clinical Governance and Leadership |
264 | 1 | |a Bingley |b Emerald Group Publishing Limited |c 2015 | |
264 | 4 | |c © 2015 | |
300 | |a 1 online resource (111 pages) | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 0 | |a Journal of Health Organization and Management : Volume 29, Issue 4 | |
500 | |a Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources | ||
520 | |a research-base for CG is gradually building, providing a strong rationale for making it a founding principle for any health system or service provider organisation. Studies have demonstrated links between clinically-led organisations and superior performances on quality of care and financial indicators.Yet despite its importance, CG remains under-researched when compared with other core policy issues facing today's health systems. There remain questions around how CG is defined and what exactly its scope is, leading some to question what the focus of it should be, how it should be designed and implemented, and health professionals themselves demanding more specific information. It could even be suggested that CG is a 'fuzzy' management concept; that without crucial detail on the structures which should be aimed for, or the roles that should be created in a health system to support CG, it will always be challenging building clinically-governed organisations. Furthermore, each organisation could end up building its own version of CG, possibly repeating mistakes made elsewhere. We, therefore, need more research into what works and why.Questions also abound around how to measure CG and leadership. Various studies have looked at components of assessment, largely deploying qualitative and case study methods, although some have also sought to quantify developmental progress across different health organisations. Some studies have developed frameworks for assessing different dimensions of CG. There are also various self-assessment tools. The divergence in approaches may be expected in a field of management and organisational research but also points to another important gap. This is the need for improved methods for researching CG, especially the approaches and tools which might be used for this, along with broader agreement on these | ||
700 | 1 | |a Horsburgh, Simon |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Robinson, Suzanne |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe |a Gauld, Robin |t Clinical Governance and Leadership |
912 | |a ZDB-30-PAD | ||
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029458421 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804177069982089216 |
---|---|
any_adam_object | |
author | Gauld, Robin |
author_facet | Gauld, Robin |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Gauld, Robin |
author_variant | r g rg |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV044051576 |
collection | ZDB-30-PAD |
ctrlnum | (ZDB-30-PAD)EBC2093101 (ZDB-89-EBL)EBL2093101 (ZDB-38-EBR)ebr11077153 (OCoLC)921278986 (DE-599)BVBBV044051576 |
dewey-full | 610.6 |
dewey-hundreds | 600 - Technology (Applied sciences) |
dewey-ones | 610 - Medicine and health |
dewey-raw | 610.6 |
dewey-search | 610.6 |
dewey-sort | 3610.6 |
dewey-tens | 610 - Medicine and health |
discipline | Medizin |
format | Electronic eBook |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03185nmm a2200397zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV044051576</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">170217s2015 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781785603716</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-78560-371-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781785603709</subfield><subfield code="c">Print</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-78560-370-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-30-PAD)EBC2093101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-89-EBL)EBL2093101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-38-EBR)ebr11077153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)921278986</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV044051576</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">610.6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gauld, Robin</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Clinical Governance and Leadership</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Bingley</subfield><subfield code="b">Emerald Group Publishing Limited</subfield><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="c">© 2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (111 pages)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Journal of Health Organization and Management : Volume 29, Issue 4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">research-base for CG is gradually building, providing a strong rationale for making it a founding principle for any health system or service provider organisation. Studies have demonstrated links between clinically-led organisations and superior performances on quality of care and financial indicators.Yet despite its importance, CG remains under-researched when compared with other core policy issues facing today's health systems. There remain questions around how CG is defined and what exactly its scope is, leading some to question what the focus of it should be, how it should be designed and implemented, and health professionals themselves demanding more specific information. It could even be suggested that CG is a 'fuzzy' management concept; that without crucial detail on the structures which should be aimed for, or the roles that should be created in a health system to support CG, it will always be challenging building clinically-governed organisations. Furthermore, each organisation could end up building its own version of CG, possibly repeating mistakes made elsewhere. We, therefore, need more research into what works and why.Questions also abound around how to measure CG and leadership. Various studies have looked at components of assessment, largely deploying qualitative and case study methods, although some have also sought to quantify developmental progress across different health organisations. Some studies have developed frameworks for assessing different dimensions of CG. There are also various self-assessment tools. The divergence in approaches may be expected in a field of management and organisational research but also points to another important gap. This is the need for improved methods for researching CG, especially the approaches and tools which might be used for this, along with broader agreement on these</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Horsburgh, Simon</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Robinson, Suzanne</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="a">Gauld, Robin</subfield><subfield code="t">Clinical Governance and Leadership</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-30-PAD</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029458421</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV044051576 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-07-10T07:42:13Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 9781785603716 9781785603709 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029458421 |
oclc_num | 921278986 |
open_access_boolean | |
physical | 1 online resource (111 pages) |
psigel | ZDB-30-PAD |
publishDate | 2015 |
publishDateSearch | 2015 |
publishDateSort | 2015 |
publisher | Emerald Group Publishing Limited |
record_format | marc |
series2 | Journal of Health Organization and Management : Volume 29, Issue 4 |
spelling | Gauld, Robin Verfasser aut Clinical Governance and Leadership Bingley Emerald Group Publishing Limited 2015 © 2015 1 online resource (111 pages) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Journal of Health Organization and Management : Volume 29, Issue 4 Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources research-base for CG is gradually building, providing a strong rationale for making it a founding principle for any health system or service provider organisation. Studies have demonstrated links between clinically-led organisations and superior performances on quality of care and financial indicators.Yet despite its importance, CG remains under-researched when compared with other core policy issues facing today's health systems. There remain questions around how CG is defined and what exactly its scope is, leading some to question what the focus of it should be, how it should be designed and implemented, and health professionals themselves demanding more specific information. It could even be suggested that CG is a 'fuzzy' management concept; that without crucial detail on the structures which should be aimed for, or the roles that should be created in a health system to support CG, it will always be challenging building clinically-governed organisations. Furthermore, each organisation could end up building its own version of CG, possibly repeating mistakes made elsewhere. We, therefore, need more research into what works and why.Questions also abound around how to measure CG and leadership. Various studies have looked at components of assessment, largely deploying qualitative and case study methods, although some have also sought to quantify developmental progress across different health organisations. Some studies have developed frameworks for assessing different dimensions of CG. There are also various self-assessment tools. The divergence in approaches may be expected in a field of management and organisational research but also points to another important gap. This is the need for improved methods for researching CG, especially the approaches and tools which might be used for this, along with broader agreement on these Horsburgh, Simon Sonstige oth Robinson, Suzanne Sonstige oth Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe Gauld, Robin Clinical Governance and Leadership |
spellingShingle | Gauld, Robin Clinical Governance and Leadership |
title | Clinical Governance and Leadership |
title_auth | Clinical Governance and Leadership |
title_exact_search | Clinical Governance and Leadership |
title_full | Clinical Governance and Leadership |
title_fullStr | Clinical Governance and Leadership |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical Governance and Leadership |
title_short | Clinical Governance and Leadership |
title_sort | clinical governance and leadership |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gauldrobin clinicalgovernanceandleadership AT horsburghsimon clinicalgovernanceandleadership AT robinsonsuzanne clinicalgovernanceandleadership |