Aporetics: Rational Deliberation in the Face of Inconsistency
Rescher defines an apory as a group of individually plausible but collectively incompatible theses. Citing thinkers from the pre-Socratics through Spinoza, Hegel, and Nicolai Hartmann, he builds a framework for coping with the complexities of divergent theses, and shows in detail how aporetic analys...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
University of Pittsburgh Press
2009
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | KUBA1 |
Zusammenfassung: | Rescher defines an apory as a group of individually plausible but collectively incompatible theses. Citing thinkers from the pre-Socratics through Spinoza, Hegel, and Nicolai Hartmann, he builds a framework for coping with the complexities of divergent theses, and shows in detail how aporetic analysis can be applied to a variety of fields including philosophy, mathematics, linguistics, logic, and intellectual history |
Beschreibung: | Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources |
Beschreibung: | 1 online resource (174 pages) |
ISBN: | 9780822973683 9780822943631 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV044050766 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 170217s2009 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
020 | |a 9780822973683 |9 978-0-8229-7368-3 | ||
020 | |a 9780822943631 |c Print |9 978-0-8229-4363-1 | ||
035 | |a (ZDB-30-PAD)EBC2039255 | ||
035 | |a (ZDB-89-EBL)EBL2039255 | ||
035 | |a (ZDB-38-EBR)ebr10863972 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)810039658 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV044050766 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-Y3 | ||
082 | 0 | |a 121 | |
100 | 1 | |a Rescher, Nicholas |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Aporetics |b Rational Deliberation in the Face of Inconsistency |
264 | 1 | |b University of Pittsburgh Press |c 2009 | |
264 | 4 | |c © 2009 | |
300 | |a 1 online resource (174 pages) | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources | ||
520 | |a Rescher defines an apory as a group of individually plausible but collectively incompatible theses. Citing thinkers from the pre-Socratics through Spinoza, Hegel, and Nicolai Hartmann, he builds a framework for coping with the complexities of divergent theses, and shows in detail how aporetic analysis can be applied to a variety of fields including philosophy, mathematics, linguistics, logic, and intellectual history | ||
650 | 4 | |a Philosophie | |
650 | 4 | |a Aporia | |
650 | 4 | |a Inconsistency | |
650 | 4 | |a Philosophy | |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Rationalität |0 (DE-588)4048507-9 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Kontrafaktisches Denken |0 (DE-588)4577003-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Aporie |0 (DE-588)4135001-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
689 | 0 | 0 | |a Rationalität |0 (DE-588)4048507-9 |D s |
689 | 0 | 1 | |a Aporie |0 (DE-588)4135001-7 |D s |
689 | 0 | 2 | |a Kontrafaktisches Denken |0 (DE-588)4577003-7 |D s |
689 | 0 | |8 1\p |5 DE-604 | |
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe |a Rescher, Nicholas |t Aporetics : Rational Deliberation in the Face of Inconsistency |
912 | |a ZDB-30-PAD | ||
940 | 1 | |q KUBA1-ZDB-30-PAD-2023 | |
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029457611 | ||
883 | 1 | |8 1\p |a cgwrk |d 20201028 |q DE-101 |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk | |
966 | e | |u https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/khifiit/detail.action?docID=2039255 |l KUBA1 |p ZDB-30-PAD |q KHI |x Aggregator |3 Volltext |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804177068521422848 |
---|---|
any_adam_object | |
author | Rescher, Nicholas |
author_facet | Rescher, Nicholas |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Rescher, Nicholas |
author_variant | n r nr |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV044050766 |
collection | ZDB-30-PAD |
ctrlnum | (ZDB-30-PAD)EBC2039255 (ZDB-89-EBL)EBL2039255 (ZDB-38-EBR)ebr10863972 (OCoLC)810039658 (DE-599)BVBBV044050766 |
dewey-full | 121 |
dewey-hundreds | 100 - Philosophy & psychology |
dewey-ones | 121 - Epistemology (Theory of knowledge) |
dewey-raw | 121 |
dewey-search | 121 |
dewey-sort | 3121 |
dewey-tens | 120 - Epistemology, causation, humankind |
discipline | Philosophie |
format | Electronic eBook |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02393nmm a2200541zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV044050766</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">170217s2009 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780822973683</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-8229-7368-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780822943631</subfield><subfield code="c">Print</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-8229-4363-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-30-PAD)EBC2039255</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-89-EBL)EBL2039255</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-38-EBR)ebr10863972</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)810039658</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV044050766</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-Y3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">121</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rescher, Nicholas</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Aporetics</subfield><subfield code="b">Rational Deliberation in the Face of Inconsistency</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="b">University of Pittsburgh Press</subfield><subfield code="c">2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="c">© 2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (174 pages)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rescher defines an apory as a group of individually plausible but collectively incompatible theses. Citing thinkers from the pre-Socratics through Spinoza, Hegel, and Nicolai Hartmann, he builds a framework for coping with the complexities of divergent theses, and shows in detail how aporetic analysis can be applied to a variety of fields including philosophy, mathematics, linguistics, logic, and intellectual history</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Philosophie</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Aporia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Inconsistency</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Philosophy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rationalität</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4048507-9</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Kontrafaktisches Denken</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4577003-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Aporie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4135001-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Rationalität</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4048507-9</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Aporie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4135001-7</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Kontrafaktisches Denken</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4577003-7</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="a">Rescher, Nicholas</subfield><subfield code="t">Aporetics : Rational Deliberation in the Face of Inconsistency</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-30-PAD</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">KUBA1-ZDB-30-PAD-2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029457611</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="883" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="a">cgwrk</subfield><subfield code="d">20201028</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-101</subfield><subfield code="u">https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/khifiit/detail.action?docID=2039255</subfield><subfield code="l">KUBA1</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-30-PAD</subfield><subfield code="q">KHI</subfield><subfield code="x">Aggregator</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV044050766 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-07-10T07:42:12Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 9780822973683 9780822943631 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029457611 |
oclc_num | 810039658 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-Y3 |
owner_facet | DE-Y3 |
physical | 1 online resource (174 pages) |
psigel | ZDB-30-PAD KUBA1-ZDB-30-PAD-2023 ZDB-30-PAD KHI |
publishDate | 2009 |
publishDateSearch | 2009 |
publishDateSort | 2009 |
publisher | University of Pittsburgh Press |
record_format | marc |
spelling | Rescher, Nicholas Verfasser aut Aporetics Rational Deliberation in the Face of Inconsistency University of Pittsburgh Press 2009 © 2009 1 online resource (174 pages) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources Rescher defines an apory as a group of individually plausible but collectively incompatible theses. Citing thinkers from the pre-Socratics through Spinoza, Hegel, and Nicolai Hartmann, he builds a framework for coping with the complexities of divergent theses, and shows in detail how aporetic analysis can be applied to a variety of fields including philosophy, mathematics, linguistics, logic, and intellectual history Philosophie Aporia Inconsistency Philosophy Rationalität (DE-588)4048507-9 gnd rswk-swf Kontrafaktisches Denken (DE-588)4577003-7 gnd rswk-swf Aporie (DE-588)4135001-7 gnd rswk-swf Rationalität (DE-588)4048507-9 s Aporie (DE-588)4135001-7 s Kontrafaktisches Denken (DE-588)4577003-7 s 1\p DE-604 Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe Rescher, Nicholas Aporetics : Rational Deliberation in the Face of Inconsistency 1\p cgwrk 20201028 DE-101 https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk |
spellingShingle | Rescher, Nicholas Aporetics Rational Deliberation in the Face of Inconsistency Philosophie Aporia Inconsistency Philosophy Rationalität (DE-588)4048507-9 gnd Kontrafaktisches Denken (DE-588)4577003-7 gnd Aporie (DE-588)4135001-7 gnd |
subject_GND | (DE-588)4048507-9 (DE-588)4577003-7 (DE-588)4135001-7 |
title | Aporetics Rational Deliberation in the Face of Inconsistency |
title_auth | Aporetics Rational Deliberation in the Face of Inconsistency |
title_exact_search | Aporetics Rational Deliberation in the Face of Inconsistency |
title_full | Aporetics Rational Deliberation in the Face of Inconsistency |
title_fullStr | Aporetics Rational Deliberation in the Face of Inconsistency |
title_full_unstemmed | Aporetics Rational Deliberation in the Face of Inconsistency |
title_short | Aporetics |
title_sort | aporetics rational deliberation in the face of inconsistency |
title_sub | Rational Deliberation in the Face of Inconsistency |
topic | Philosophie Aporia Inconsistency Philosophy Rationalität (DE-588)4048507-9 gnd Kontrafaktisches Denken (DE-588)4577003-7 gnd Aporie (DE-588)4135001-7 gnd |
topic_facet | Philosophie Aporia Inconsistency Philosophy Rationalität Kontrafaktisches Denken Aporie |
work_keys_str_mv | AT reschernicholas aporeticsrationaldeliberationinthefaceofinconsistency |