Culpable carelessness: recklessness and negligence in the criminal law
The question of when a person is culpable for taking an unjustified risk of harm has long been controversial in Anglo-American criminal law doctrine and theory. This survey of the approaches adopted in England and Wales, Canada, Australia, the United States, New Zealand and Scotland argues that they...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge
Cambridge University Press
2016
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | BSB01 Volltext Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| Zusammenfassung: | The question of when a person is culpable for taking an unjustified risk of harm has long been controversial in Anglo-American criminal law doctrine and theory. This survey of the approaches adopted in England and Wales, Canada, Australia, the United States, New Zealand and Scotland argues that they are converging, to differing extents, around a 'Standard Account' of culpable unjustified risk-taking. This Standard Account distinguishes between awareness-based culpability (recklessness) and inadvertence-based culpability (negligence) for unjustified risk-taking. With reference to criminal law theory and philosophical literature, the author argues that, when explained appropriately, the Standard Account is defensible and practical. Defending the Standard Account involves analysing in depth a number of controversial matters, including the meaning of advertence/awareness, the role of attitudes such as indifference in culpable risk-taking, and the question of whether negligence should be used in the criminal law |
| Beschreibung: | Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 31 Jan 2017) |
| Beschreibung: | 1 online resource (xxii, 327 pages) |
| ISBN: | 9781139855945 |
| DOI: | 10.1017/CBO9781139855945 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV044044348 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20170222 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 170215s2016 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9781139855945 |c Online |9 978-1-139-85594-5 | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/CBO9781139855945 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (ZDB-20-CBO)CR9781139855945 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)961995267 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV044044348 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 345/.04 | |
| 100 | 1 | |a Stark, Findlay |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Culpable carelessness |b recklessness and negligence in the criminal law |c Findlay Stark, Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge, Jesus College, Cambridge |
| 264 | 1 | |a Cambridge |b Cambridge University Press |c 2016 | |
| 300 | |a 1 online resource (xxii, 327 pages) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 31 Jan 2017) | ||
| 520 | |a The question of when a person is culpable for taking an unjustified risk of harm has long been controversial in Anglo-American criminal law doctrine and theory. This survey of the approaches adopted in England and Wales, Canada, Australia, the United States, New Zealand and Scotland argues that they are converging, to differing extents, around a 'Standard Account' of culpable unjustified risk-taking. This Standard Account distinguishes between awareness-based culpability (recklessness) and inadvertence-based culpability (negligence) for unjustified risk-taking. With reference to criminal law theory and philosophical literature, the author argues that, when explained appropriately, the Standard Account is defensible and practical. Defending the Standard Account involves analysing in depth a number of controversial matters, including the meaning of advertence/awareness, the role of attitudes such as indifference in culpable risk-taking, and the question of whether negligence should be used in the criminal law | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Negligence, Criminal | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Criminal intent | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Criminal law | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe, Hardcover |z 978-1-107-03890-5 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139855945 |x Verlag |z URL des Erstveröffentlichers |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m SWB Datenaustausch |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029451323&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 912 | |a ZDB-20-CBO | ||
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029451323 | ||
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139855945 |l BSB01 |p ZDB-20-CBO |q BSB_PDA_CBO |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804177057166393344 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | CONTENTS
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS X
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS XII
TABLE OF CASES XIV
TABLE OF LEGISLATION XX
INTRODUCTION 1
AN OVERVIEW OF THE ARGUMENT 5
RISKS AND WRONGDOING 10
WHY IS JUSTIFICATION REQUIRED? 11
JUSTIFYING RISK-TAKING 20
THE DOCTRINAL TREND TOWARDS THE STANDARD ACCOUNT 26
ENGLAND AND WALES 27
CANADA 34
AUSTRALIA 38
THE UNITED STATES 46
NEW ZEALAND 58
SCOTLAND 60
CONCLUSION 64
CONSISTENCY IN DEFINITION 67
DEFENDING MULTIPLE DEFINITIONS 68
AN ALTERNATIVE APPROACH 71
PRACTICAL CONCERNS 83
CONCLUSION 89
FROM AWARENESS TO BELIEF 90
THE NECESSITY OF BELIEF 92
BELIEVING THAT P 94
REVISITING THE EXISTING LITERATURE 111
CONCLUSION 122
VI1
VLLL TABLE OF CONTENTS
5 BEYOND BELIEF: KNOWLEDGE AND AWARENESS
OF RISK 123
HUSAK ON KNOWLEDGE 124
BELIEVING THAT IT IS VIRTUALLY CERTAIN THAT THERE
IS A RISK 126
JUSTIFIED, TRUE BELIEF 128
CONCLUSION 140
6 THE SIGNIFICANCE OF AWARENESS OF RISK 141
CHOICE IN DOCTRINE 143
CHOICE: A WORKING DEFINITION 145
CHOICE AND ALTERNATIVES 147
CHOICE AND CONTROL 151
CHOICE AND FAIR WARNING 163
CHOICE AND PUNISHMENT 166
CHOICE AND METIS REA 171
THE SIGNIFICANCE OF CHOICE 174
CONCLUSION 176
7 CULPABILITY BEYOND AWARENESS OF RISK: SOME EXISTING
ACCOUNTS 178
CONDUCT: HART S INSIGHT 179
TRACING ACCOUNTS 192
CULPABILITY AND COUNTERFACTUALS 201
ATTITUDINAL ACCOUNTS 208
CONCLUSION 225
8 NEGLIGENCE AS FAILURE OF BELIEF 226
BELIEFS, NOT BEHAVIOUR 227
A PRELIMINARY SKETCH OF BELIEF FORMATION 229
BELIEF FORMATION AND THE WILL 232
INCORRECT BELIEFS ABOUT RISK 236
NO BELIEFS ABOUT RISK 241
THE REASON FOR THE FAILURE OF BELIEF 243
A WIDER VIEW: REFLECTING CHARACTER 247
OBJECTIONS AND CLARIFICATIONS 252
TWO EXAMPLES 266
TADROS S ACCOUNT OF RECKLESSNESS (AND/OR NEGLIGENCE) 269
CONCLUSION 271
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SOME PRACTICALITIES 273
THE SUBSTANTIVE LAW 273
EVIDENTIAL CONCERNS 284
CONCLUSION 291
BIBLIOGRAPHY 292
INDEX 316
|
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| author | Stark, Findlay |
| author_facet | Stark, Findlay |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Stark, Findlay |
| author_variant | f s fs |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV044044348 |
| collection | ZDB-20-CBO |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-20-CBO)CR9781139855945 (OCoLC)961995267 (DE-599)BVBBV044044348 |
| dewey-full | 345/.04 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 345 - Criminal law |
| dewey-raw | 345/.04 |
| dewey-search | 345/.04 |
| dewey-sort | 3345 14 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/CBO9781139855945 |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02754nmm a2200409zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV044044348</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20170222 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">170215s2016 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781139855945</subfield><subfield code="c">Online</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-139-85594-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1017/CBO9781139855945</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-20-CBO)CR9781139855945</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)961995267</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV044044348</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">345/.04</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Stark, Findlay</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Culpable carelessness</subfield><subfield code="b">recklessness and negligence in the criminal law</subfield><subfield code="c">Findlay Stark, Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge, Jesus College, Cambridge</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cambridge</subfield><subfield code="b">Cambridge University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (xxii, 327 pages)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 31 Jan 2017)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The question of when a person is culpable for taking an unjustified risk of harm has long been controversial in Anglo-American criminal law doctrine and theory. This survey of the approaches adopted in England and Wales, Canada, Australia, the United States, New Zealand and Scotland argues that they are converging, to differing extents, around a 'Standard Account' of culpable unjustified risk-taking. This Standard Account distinguishes between awareness-based culpability (recklessness) and inadvertence-based culpability (negligence) for unjustified risk-taking. With reference to criminal law theory and philosophical literature, the author argues that, when explained appropriately, the Standard Account is defensible and practical. Defending the Standard Account involves analysing in depth a number of controversial matters, including the meaning of advertence/awareness, the role of attitudes such as indifference in culpable risk-taking, and the question of whether negligence should be used in the criminal law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Negligence, Criminal</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Criminal intent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Criminal law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe, Hardcover</subfield><subfield code="z">978-1-107-03890-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139855945</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">URL des Erstveröffentlichers</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">SWB Datenaustausch</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029451323&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029451323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139855945</subfield><subfield code="l">BSB01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield><subfield code="q">BSB_PDA_CBO</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV044044348 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T07:42:01Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9781139855945 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029451323 |
| oclc_num | 961995267 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 |
| physical | 1 online resource (xxii, 327 pages) |
| psigel | ZDB-20-CBO ZDB-20-CBO BSB_PDA_CBO |
| publishDate | 2016 |
| publishDateSearch | 2016 |
| publishDateSort | 2016 |
| publisher | Cambridge University Press |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Stark, Findlay Verfasser aut Culpable carelessness recklessness and negligence in the criminal law Findlay Stark, Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge, Jesus College, Cambridge Cambridge Cambridge University Press 2016 1 online resource (xxii, 327 pages) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 31 Jan 2017) The question of when a person is culpable for taking an unjustified risk of harm has long been controversial in Anglo-American criminal law doctrine and theory. This survey of the approaches adopted in England and Wales, Canada, Australia, the United States, New Zealand and Scotland argues that they are converging, to differing extents, around a 'Standard Account' of culpable unjustified risk-taking. This Standard Account distinguishes between awareness-based culpability (recklessness) and inadvertence-based culpability (negligence) for unjustified risk-taking. With reference to criminal law theory and philosophical literature, the author argues that, when explained appropriately, the Standard Account is defensible and practical. Defending the Standard Account involves analysing in depth a number of controversial matters, including the meaning of advertence/awareness, the role of attitudes such as indifference in culpable risk-taking, and the question of whether negligence should be used in the criminal law Negligence, Criminal Criminal intent Criminal law Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe, Hardcover 978-1-107-03890-5 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139855945 Verlag URL des Erstveröffentlichers Volltext SWB Datenaustausch application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029451323&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| spellingShingle | Stark, Findlay Culpable carelessness recklessness and negligence in the criminal law Negligence, Criminal Criminal intent Criminal law |
| title | Culpable carelessness recklessness and negligence in the criminal law |
| title_auth | Culpable carelessness recklessness and negligence in the criminal law |
| title_exact_search | Culpable carelessness recklessness and negligence in the criminal law |
| title_full | Culpable carelessness recklessness and negligence in the criminal law Findlay Stark, Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge, Jesus College, Cambridge |
| title_fullStr | Culpable carelessness recklessness and negligence in the criminal law Findlay Stark, Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge, Jesus College, Cambridge |
| title_full_unstemmed | Culpable carelessness recklessness and negligence in the criminal law Findlay Stark, Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge, Jesus College, Cambridge |
| title_short | Culpable carelessness |
| title_sort | culpable carelessness recklessness and negligence in the criminal law |
| title_sub | recklessness and negligence in the criminal law |
| topic | Negligence, Criminal Criminal intent Criminal law |
| topic_facet | Negligence, Criminal Criminal intent Criminal law |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139855945 http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029451323&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT starkfindlay culpablecarelessnessrecklessnessandnegligenceinthecriminallaw |