The politics of performance funding for higher education: origins, discontinuations, and transformations
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Baltimore
Johns Hopkins University Press
2015
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | FAW01 FAW02 |
Beschreibung: | Includes bibliographical references and index "One of the striking ways in which state governments have pursued better performance in public higher education is through the use of performance funding. Performance funding involves tying state support directly to institutional performance on specific outcomes such as rates of graduation and job placement. The principal rationale for performance funding has been that the introduction of market-like forces will prod institutions to become more efficient, delivering "more bang for the buck." Kevin Dougherty, an expert on state performance funding, finds its development puzzling. First, despite the great interest in it, only half the states have ever adopted performance funding for higher education. Moreover, of the states that did adopt performance funding, over half later dropped it. Finally, in the states that have retained performance funding over a long period of time, their programs have undergone considerable changes in the amount of state funding they devote to performance funding and in the content of the indicators they use to allocate that funding. In spite of this, performance funding continues to attract interest as a way of improving educational outcomes. This book, based on an extensive ten-state study, aims to shed light on the social and political factors affecting the origins, evolution, and demise of these programs"-- "Performance funding ties state support of colleges and universities directly to institutional performance on specific outcomes, including retention, number of credits accrued, graduation, and job placement. The theory is that introducing market-like forces will prod institutions to become more efficient and effective. In The Politics of Performance Funding for Higher Education, Kevin J. Dougherty and Rebecca S. Natow explore the sometimes puzzling evolution of this mode of funding higher education. Drawing on an eight-state study of performance funding in Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Missouri, Ohio, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Washington, Dougherty and Natow shed light on the social and political factors affecting the origins, evolution, and demise of these programs. Their findings uncover patterns of frequent adoption, discontinuation, and re-adoption. Of the thirty-six states that have ever adopted performance funding, two-thirds discontinued it, although many of those later re-adopted it. Even when performance funding programs persist over time, they can undergo considerable changes in both the amount of state funding and in the indicators used to allocate funding. Yet performance funding continues to attract interest from federal and state officials, state policy associations, and major foundations as a way of improving educational outcomes. The authors explore the various forces, actors, and motives behind the adoption, discontinuation, and transformation of performance funding programs. They compare U.S. programs to international models, and they gauge the likely future of performance funding, given the volatility of the political forces driving it. Aimed at educators, sociologists, political scientists, and policy makers, this book will be hailed as the definitive assessment of the origins and evolution of performance funding"-- Putting U.S. performance funding in context -- The varying trajectories of higher education performance funding programs -- Origins of the first wave of state performance funding options / with Rachel Hare Bork, Sosanya M. Jones, and Blanca E. Vega -- Incremental change in Florida, Ohio, and Tennessee -- Performance funding discontinued: lessons from Florida, Illinois, Missouri, and Washington -- Origins of the second wave of performance funding adoptions / with Sosany M. Jones, Hana Lahr, Lara Pheatt, and Vikash Reddy -- Conclusions -- Appendix: research questions, theoretical perspectives, and research |
ISBN: | 9781421416915 1421416913 9781421416908 1421416905 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV043960778 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 161213s2015 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
020 | |a 9781421416915 |9 978-1-4214-1691-5 | ||
020 | |a 1421416913 |9 1-4214-1691-3 | ||
020 | |a 9781421416908 |9 978-1-4214-1690-8 | ||
020 | |a 1421416905 |9 1-4214-1690-5 | ||
035 | |a (ZDB-4-EBA)ocn906761347 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)906761347 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV043960778 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-1047 |a DE-1046 | ||
082 | 0 | |a 379.1/18 |2 23 | |
100 | 1 | |a Dougherty, Kevin James |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a The politics of performance funding for higher education |b origins, discontinuations, and transformations |c Kevin J. Dougherty and Rebecca S. Natow |
264 | 1 | |a Baltimore |b Johns Hopkins University Press |c 2015 | |
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Includes bibliographical references and index | ||
500 | |a "One of the striking ways in which state governments have pursued better performance in public higher education is through the use of performance funding. Performance funding involves tying state support directly to institutional performance on specific outcomes such as rates of graduation and job placement. The principal rationale for performance funding has been that the introduction of market-like forces will prod institutions to become more efficient, delivering "more bang for the buck." Kevin Dougherty, an expert on state performance funding, finds its development puzzling. First, despite the great interest in it, only half the states have ever adopted performance funding for higher education. Moreover, of the states that did adopt performance funding, over half later dropped it. Finally, in the states that have retained performance funding over a long period of time, their programs have undergone considerable changes in the amount of state funding they devote to performance funding and in the content of the indicators they use to allocate that funding. In spite of this, performance funding continues to attract interest as a way of improving educational outcomes. This book, based on an extensive ten-state study, aims to shed light on the social and political factors affecting the origins, evolution, and demise of these programs"-- | ||
500 | |a "Performance funding ties state support of colleges and universities directly to institutional performance on specific outcomes, including retention, number of credits accrued, graduation, and job placement. The theory is that introducing market-like forces will prod institutions to become more efficient and effective. In The Politics of Performance Funding for Higher Education, Kevin J. Dougherty and Rebecca S. Natow explore the sometimes puzzling evolution of this mode of funding higher education. Drawing on an eight-state study of performance funding in Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Missouri, Ohio, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Washington, Dougherty and Natow shed light on the social and political factors affecting the origins, evolution, and demise of these programs. Their findings uncover patterns of frequent adoption, discontinuation, and re-adoption. Of the thirty-six states that have ever adopted performance funding, two-thirds discontinued it, although many of those later re-adopted it. Even when performance funding programs persist over time, they can undergo considerable changes in both the amount of state funding and in the indicators used to allocate funding. Yet performance funding continues to attract interest from federal and state officials, state policy associations, and major foundations as a way of improving educational outcomes. The authors explore the various forces, actors, and motives behind the adoption, discontinuation, and transformation of performance funding programs. They compare U.S. programs to international models, and they gauge the likely future of performance funding, given the volatility of the political forces driving it. Aimed at educators, sociologists, political scientists, and policy makers, this book will be hailed as the definitive assessment of the origins and evolution of performance funding"-- | ||
500 | |a Putting U.S. performance funding in context -- The varying trajectories of higher education performance funding programs -- Origins of the first wave of state performance funding options / with Rachel Hare Bork, Sosanya M. Jones, and Blanca E. Vega -- Incremental change in Florida, Ohio, and Tennessee -- Performance funding discontinued: lessons from Florida, Illinois, Missouri, and Washington -- Origins of the second wave of performance funding adoptions / with Sosany M. Jones, Hana Lahr, Lara Pheatt, and Vikash Reddy -- Conclusions -- Appendix: research questions, theoretical perspectives, and research | ||
650 | 7 | |a SOCIAL SCIENCE / Sociology / General |2 bisacsh | |
650 | 7 | |a POLITICAL SCIENCE / Public Policy / General |2 bisacsh | |
650 | 7 | |a EDUCATION / Higher |2 bisacsh | |
650 | 7 | |a EDUCATION / Administration / General |2 bisacsh | |
650 | 7 | |a EDUCATION / Educational Policy & Reform / General |2 bisacsh | |
650 | 7 | |a Education, Higher / Economic aspects |2 fast | |
650 | 7 | |a Government aid to higher education |2 fast | |
650 | 7 | |a Universities and colleges / Finance |2 fast | |
650 | 4 | |a Education, Higher |x Economic aspects |z United States | |
650 | 4 | |a Universities and colleges |z United States |x Finance | |
650 | 4 | |a Government aid to higher education | |
651 | 4 | |a USA | |
700 | 1 | |a Natow, Rebecca S. |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
912 | |a ZDB-4-EBA | ||
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029369483 | ||
966 | e | |u http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=882681 |l FAW01 |p ZDB-4-EBA |q FAW_PDA_EBA |x Aggregator |3 Volltext | |
966 | e | |u http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=882681 |l FAW02 |p ZDB-4-EBA |q FAW_PDA_EBA |x Aggregator |3 Volltext |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804176917929132032 |
---|---|
any_adam_object | |
author | Dougherty, Kevin James |
author_facet | Dougherty, Kevin James |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Dougherty, Kevin James |
author_variant | k j d kj kjd |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV043960778 |
collection | ZDB-4-EBA |
ctrlnum | (ZDB-4-EBA)ocn906761347 (OCoLC)906761347 (DE-599)BVBBV043960778 |
dewey-full | 379.1/18 |
dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
dewey-ones | 379 - Public policy issues in education |
dewey-raw | 379.1/18 |
dewey-search | 379.1/18 |
dewey-sort | 3379.1 218 |
dewey-tens | 370 - Education |
discipline | Pädagogik |
format | Electronic eBook |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>06033nmm a2200541zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV043960778</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">161213s2015 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781421416915</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-4214-1691-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1421416913</subfield><subfield code="9">1-4214-1691-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781421416908</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-4214-1690-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1421416905</subfield><subfield code="9">1-4214-1690-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-4-EBA)ocn906761347</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)906761347</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV043960778</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-1047</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">379.1/18</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dougherty, Kevin James</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The politics of performance funding for higher education</subfield><subfield code="b">origins, discontinuations, and transformations</subfield><subfield code="c">Kevin J. Dougherty and Rebecca S. Natow</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Baltimore</subfield><subfield code="b">Johns Hopkins University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references and index</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"One of the striking ways in which state governments have pursued better performance in public higher education is through the use of performance funding. Performance funding involves tying state support directly to institutional performance on specific outcomes such as rates of graduation and job placement. The principal rationale for performance funding has been that the introduction of market-like forces will prod institutions to become more efficient, delivering "more bang for the buck." Kevin Dougherty, an expert on state performance funding, finds its development puzzling. First, despite the great interest in it, only half the states have ever adopted performance funding for higher education. Moreover, of the states that did adopt performance funding, over half later dropped it. Finally, in the states that have retained performance funding over a long period of time, their programs have undergone considerable changes in the amount of state funding they devote to performance funding and in the content of the indicators they use to allocate that funding. In spite of this, performance funding continues to attract interest as a way of improving educational outcomes. This book, based on an extensive ten-state study, aims to shed light on the social and political factors affecting the origins, evolution, and demise of these programs"--</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"Performance funding ties state support of colleges and universities directly to institutional performance on specific outcomes, including retention, number of credits accrued, graduation, and job placement. The theory is that introducing market-like forces will prod institutions to become more efficient and effective. In The Politics of Performance Funding for Higher Education, Kevin J. Dougherty and Rebecca S. Natow explore the sometimes puzzling evolution of this mode of funding higher education. Drawing on an eight-state study of performance funding in Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Missouri, Ohio, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Washington, Dougherty and Natow shed light on the social and political factors affecting the origins, evolution, and demise of these programs. Their findings uncover patterns of frequent adoption, discontinuation, and re-adoption. Of the thirty-six states that have ever adopted performance funding, two-thirds discontinued it, although many of those later re-adopted it. Even when performance funding programs persist over time, they can undergo considerable changes in both the amount of state funding and in the indicators used to allocate funding. Yet performance funding continues to attract interest from federal and state officials, state policy associations, and major foundations as a way of improving educational outcomes. The authors explore the various forces, actors, and motives behind the adoption, discontinuation, and transformation of performance funding programs. They compare U.S. programs to international models, and they gauge the likely future of performance funding, given the volatility of the political forces driving it. Aimed at educators, sociologists, political scientists, and policy makers, this book will be hailed as the definitive assessment of the origins and evolution of performance funding"--</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Putting U.S. performance funding in context -- The varying trajectories of higher education performance funding programs -- Origins of the first wave of state performance funding options / with Rachel Hare Bork, Sosanya M. Jones, and Blanca E. Vega -- Incremental change in Florida, Ohio, and Tennessee -- Performance funding discontinued: lessons from Florida, Illinois, Missouri, and Washington -- Origins of the second wave of performance funding adoptions / with Sosany M. Jones, Hana Lahr, Lara Pheatt, and Vikash Reddy -- Conclusions -- Appendix: research questions, theoretical perspectives, and research</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">SOCIAL SCIENCE / Sociology / General</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">POLITICAL SCIENCE / Public Policy / General</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">EDUCATION / Higher</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">EDUCATION / Administration / General</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">EDUCATION / Educational Policy & Reform / General</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Education, Higher / Economic aspects</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Government aid to higher education</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Universities and colleges / Finance</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Education, Higher</subfield><subfield code="x">Economic aspects</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Universities and colleges</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield><subfield code="x">Finance</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Government aid to higher education</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Natow, Rebecca S.</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029369483</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=882681</subfield><subfield code="l">FAW01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield><subfield code="q">FAW_PDA_EBA</subfield><subfield code="x">Aggregator</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=882681</subfield><subfield code="l">FAW02</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield><subfield code="q">FAW_PDA_EBA</subfield><subfield code="x">Aggregator</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
geographic | USA |
geographic_facet | USA |
id | DE-604.BV043960778 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-07-10T07:39:48Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 9781421416915 1421416913 9781421416908 1421416905 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029369483 |
oclc_num | 906761347 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-1047 DE-1046 |
owner_facet | DE-1047 DE-1046 |
psigel | ZDB-4-EBA ZDB-4-EBA FAW_PDA_EBA |
publishDate | 2015 |
publishDateSearch | 2015 |
publishDateSort | 2015 |
publisher | Johns Hopkins University Press |
record_format | marc |
spelling | Dougherty, Kevin James Verfasser aut The politics of performance funding for higher education origins, discontinuations, and transformations Kevin J. Dougherty and Rebecca S. Natow Baltimore Johns Hopkins University Press 2015 txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Includes bibliographical references and index "One of the striking ways in which state governments have pursued better performance in public higher education is through the use of performance funding. Performance funding involves tying state support directly to institutional performance on specific outcomes such as rates of graduation and job placement. The principal rationale for performance funding has been that the introduction of market-like forces will prod institutions to become more efficient, delivering "more bang for the buck." Kevin Dougherty, an expert on state performance funding, finds its development puzzling. First, despite the great interest in it, only half the states have ever adopted performance funding for higher education. Moreover, of the states that did adopt performance funding, over half later dropped it. Finally, in the states that have retained performance funding over a long period of time, their programs have undergone considerable changes in the amount of state funding they devote to performance funding and in the content of the indicators they use to allocate that funding. In spite of this, performance funding continues to attract interest as a way of improving educational outcomes. This book, based on an extensive ten-state study, aims to shed light on the social and political factors affecting the origins, evolution, and demise of these programs"-- "Performance funding ties state support of colleges and universities directly to institutional performance on specific outcomes, including retention, number of credits accrued, graduation, and job placement. The theory is that introducing market-like forces will prod institutions to become more efficient and effective. In The Politics of Performance Funding for Higher Education, Kevin J. Dougherty and Rebecca S. Natow explore the sometimes puzzling evolution of this mode of funding higher education. Drawing on an eight-state study of performance funding in Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Missouri, Ohio, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Washington, Dougherty and Natow shed light on the social and political factors affecting the origins, evolution, and demise of these programs. Their findings uncover patterns of frequent adoption, discontinuation, and re-adoption. Of the thirty-six states that have ever adopted performance funding, two-thirds discontinued it, although many of those later re-adopted it. Even when performance funding programs persist over time, they can undergo considerable changes in both the amount of state funding and in the indicators used to allocate funding. Yet performance funding continues to attract interest from federal and state officials, state policy associations, and major foundations as a way of improving educational outcomes. The authors explore the various forces, actors, and motives behind the adoption, discontinuation, and transformation of performance funding programs. They compare U.S. programs to international models, and they gauge the likely future of performance funding, given the volatility of the political forces driving it. Aimed at educators, sociologists, political scientists, and policy makers, this book will be hailed as the definitive assessment of the origins and evolution of performance funding"-- Putting U.S. performance funding in context -- The varying trajectories of higher education performance funding programs -- Origins of the first wave of state performance funding options / with Rachel Hare Bork, Sosanya M. Jones, and Blanca E. Vega -- Incremental change in Florida, Ohio, and Tennessee -- Performance funding discontinued: lessons from Florida, Illinois, Missouri, and Washington -- Origins of the second wave of performance funding adoptions / with Sosany M. Jones, Hana Lahr, Lara Pheatt, and Vikash Reddy -- Conclusions -- Appendix: research questions, theoretical perspectives, and research SOCIAL SCIENCE / Sociology / General bisacsh POLITICAL SCIENCE / Public Policy / General bisacsh EDUCATION / Higher bisacsh EDUCATION / Administration / General bisacsh EDUCATION / Educational Policy & Reform / General bisacsh Education, Higher / Economic aspects fast Government aid to higher education fast Universities and colleges / Finance fast Education, Higher Economic aspects United States Universities and colleges United States Finance Government aid to higher education USA Natow, Rebecca S. Sonstige oth |
spellingShingle | Dougherty, Kevin James The politics of performance funding for higher education origins, discontinuations, and transformations SOCIAL SCIENCE / Sociology / General bisacsh POLITICAL SCIENCE / Public Policy / General bisacsh EDUCATION / Higher bisacsh EDUCATION / Administration / General bisacsh EDUCATION / Educational Policy & Reform / General bisacsh Education, Higher / Economic aspects fast Government aid to higher education fast Universities and colleges / Finance fast Education, Higher Economic aspects United States Universities and colleges United States Finance Government aid to higher education |
title | The politics of performance funding for higher education origins, discontinuations, and transformations |
title_auth | The politics of performance funding for higher education origins, discontinuations, and transformations |
title_exact_search | The politics of performance funding for higher education origins, discontinuations, and transformations |
title_full | The politics of performance funding for higher education origins, discontinuations, and transformations Kevin J. Dougherty and Rebecca S. Natow |
title_fullStr | The politics of performance funding for higher education origins, discontinuations, and transformations Kevin J. Dougherty and Rebecca S. Natow |
title_full_unstemmed | The politics of performance funding for higher education origins, discontinuations, and transformations Kevin J. Dougherty and Rebecca S. Natow |
title_short | The politics of performance funding for higher education |
title_sort | the politics of performance funding for higher education origins discontinuations and transformations |
title_sub | origins, discontinuations, and transformations |
topic | SOCIAL SCIENCE / Sociology / General bisacsh POLITICAL SCIENCE / Public Policy / General bisacsh EDUCATION / Higher bisacsh EDUCATION / Administration / General bisacsh EDUCATION / Educational Policy & Reform / General bisacsh Education, Higher / Economic aspects fast Government aid to higher education fast Universities and colleges / Finance fast Education, Higher Economic aspects United States Universities and colleges United States Finance Government aid to higher education |
topic_facet | SOCIAL SCIENCE / Sociology / General POLITICAL SCIENCE / Public Policy / General EDUCATION / Higher EDUCATION / Administration / General EDUCATION / Educational Policy & Reform / General Education, Higher / Economic aspects Government aid to higher education Universities and colleges / Finance Education, Higher Economic aspects United States Universities and colleges United States Finance USA |
work_keys_str_mv | AT doughertykevinjames thepoliticsofperformancefundingforhighereducationoriginsdiscontinuationsandtransformations AT natowrebeccas thepoliticsofperformancefundingforhighereducationoriginsdiscontinuationsandtransformations |