Legislative deferrals: statutory ambiguity, judicial power, and American democracy
Why do unelected federal judges have so much power to make policy in the United States? Why were federal judges able to thwart apparent legislative victories won by labor organizations in the Lochner era? Most scholars who have addressed such questions assume that the answer lies in the judiciary...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge
Cambridge University Press
2003
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | BSB01 UBG01 Volltext |
Zusammenfassung: | Why do unelected federal judges have so much power to make policy in the United States? Why were federal judges able to thwart apparent legislative victories won by labor organizations in the Lochner era? Most scholars who have addressed such questions assume that the answer lies in the judiciary's constitutionally guaranteed independence, and thus worry that insulated judges threaten democracy when they stray from baseline positions chosen by legislators. This book argues for a fundamental shift in the way scholars think about judicial policy-making. Scholars need to notice that legislators also empower judges to make policy as a means of escaping accountability. This study of legislative deference to the courts offers a dramatic reinterpretation of the history of twentieth-century labor law and shows how attention to legislative deferrals can help scholars to address vexing questions about the consequences of judicial power in a democracy |
Beschreibung: | Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 08 Oct 2015) |
Beschreibung: | 1 online resource (xxi, 290 pages) |
ISBN: | 9780511509872 |
DOI: | 10.1017/CBO9780511509872 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV043929471 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 161202s2003 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
020 | |a 9780511509872 |c Online |9 978-0-511-50987-2 | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/CBO9780511509872 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (ZDB-20-CBO)CR9780511509872 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)967422354 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV043929471 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-473 | ||
082 | 0 | |a 342.73/052 |2 21 | |
100 | 1 | |a Lovell, George I. |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Legislative deferrals |b statutory ambiguity, judicial power, and American democracy |c George I. Lovell |
264 | 1 | |a Cambridge |b Cambridge University Press |c 2003 | |
300 | |a 1 online resource (xxi, 290 pages) | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 08 Oct 2015) | ||
505 | 8 | |a Rethinking judicial policy making in a separation of powers system -- False victories: labor, Congress, and the courts, 1898-1935 -- "As harmless as an infant": the Erdman Act in Congress and the courts -- Killing with kindness: legislative ambiguity, judicial policy making, and the Clayton Act -- The Norris-LaGuardia Act, for once: learning what to learn from the past -- Legislative deferrals and judicial policy making in the administrative state: a brief look at the Wagner Act | |
520 | |a Why do unelected federal judges have so much power to make policy in the United States? Why were federal judges able to thwart apparent legislative victories won by labor organizations in the Lochner era? Most scholars who have addressed such questions assume that the answer lies in the judiciary's constitutionally guaranteed independence, and thus worry that insulated judges threaten democracy when they stray from baseline positions chosen by legislators. This book argues for a fundamental shift in the way scholars think about judicial policy-making. Scholars need to notice that legislators also empower judges to make policy as a means of escaping accountability. This study of legislative deference to the courts offers a dramatic reinterpretation of the history of twentieth-century labor law and shows how attention to legislative deferrals can help scholars to address vexing questions about the consequences of judicial power in a democracy | ||
650 | 4 | |a Political questions and judicial power / United States | |
650 | 4 | |a Judge-made law / United States | |
650 | 4 | |a Legislative power / United States | |
650 | 4 | |a Separation of powers / United States | |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Gesetzgebung |0 (DE-588)4020682-8 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Demokratie |0 (DE-588)4011413-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
651 | 4 | |a USA | |
651 | 7 | |a USA |0 (DE-588)4078704-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
689 | 0 | 0 | |a USA |0 (DE-588)4078704-7 |D g |
689 | 0 | 1 | |a Gesetzgebung |0 (DE-588)4020682-8 |D s |
689 | 0 | 2 | |a Demokratie |0 (DE-588)4011413-2 |D s |
689 | 0 | |8 1\p |5 DE-604 | |
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druckausgabe |z 978-0-521-16870-0 |
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druckausgabe |z 978-0-521-82415-6 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511509872 |x Verlag |z URL des Erstveröffentlichers |3 Volltext |
912 | |a ZDB-20-CBO | ||
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029338550 | ||
883 | 1 | |8 1\p |a cgwrk |d 20201028 |q DE-101 |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk | |
966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511509872 |l BSB01 |p ZDB-20-CBO |q BSB_PDA_CBO |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511509872 |l UBG01 |p ZDB-20-CBO |q UBG_PDA_CBO |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804176860174614528 |
---|---|
any_adam_object | |
author | Lovell, George I. |
author_facet | Lovell, George I. |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Lovell, George I. |
author_variant | g i l gi gil |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV043929471 |
collection | ZDB-20-CBO |
contents | Rethinking judicial policy making in a separation of powers system -- False victories: labor, Congress, and the courts, 1898-1935 -- "As harmless as an infant": the Erdman Act in Congress and the courts -- Killing with kindness: legislative ambiguity, judicial policy making, and the Clayton Act -- The Norris-LaGuardia Act, for once: learning what to learn from the past -- Legislative deferrals and judicial policy making in the administrative state: a brief look at the Wagner Act |
ctrlnum | (ZDB-20-CBO)CR9780511509872 (OCoLC)967422354 (DE-599)BVBBV043929471 |
dewey-full | 342.73/052 |
dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
dewey-ones | 342 - Constitutional and administrative law |
dewey-raw | 342.73/052 |
dewey-search | 342.73/052 |
dewey-sort | 3342.73 252 |
dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/CBO9780511509872 |
format | Electronic eBook |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03646nmm a2200553zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV043929471</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">161202s2003 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780511509872</subfield><subfield code="c">Online</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-511-50987-2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1017/CBO9780511509872</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-20-CBO)CR9780511509872</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)967422354</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV043929471</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">342.73/052</subfield><subfield code="2">21</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lovell, George I.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Legislative deferrals</subfield><subfield code="b">statutory ambiguity, judicial power, and American democracy</subfield><subfield code="c">George I. Lovell</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cambridge</subfield><subfield code="b">Cambridge University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (xxi, 290 pages)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 08 Oct 2015)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rethinking judicial policy making in a separation of powers system -- False victories: labor, Congress, and the courts, 1898-1935 -- "As harmless as an infant": the Erdman Act in Congress and the courts -- Killing with kindness: legislative ambiguity, judicial policy making, and the Clayton Act -- The Norris-LaGuardia Act, for once: learning what to learn from the past -- Legislative deferrals and judicial policy making in the administrative state: a brief look at the Wagner Act</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Why do unelected federal judges have so much power to make policy in the United States? Why were federal judges able to thwart apparent legislative victories won by labor organizations in the Lochner era? Most scholars who have addressed such questions assume that the answer lies in the judiciary's constitutionally guaranteed independence, and thus worry that insulated judges threaten democracy when they stray from baseline positions chosen by legislators. This book argues for a fundamental shift in the way scholars think about judicial policy-making. Scholars need to notice that legislators also empower judges to make policy as a means of escaping accountability. This study of legislative deference to the courts offers a dramatic reinterpretation of the history of twentieth-century labor law and shows how attention to legislative deferrals can help scholars to address vexing questions about the consequences of judicial power in a democracy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Political questions and judicial power / United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Judge-made law / United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Legislative power / United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Separation of powers / United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Gesetzgebung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4020682-8</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Demokratie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4011413-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078704-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078704-7</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Gesetzgebung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4020682-8</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Demokratie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4011413-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druckausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">978-0-521-16870-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druckausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">978-0-521-82415-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511509872</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">URL des Erstveröffentlichers</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029338550</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="883" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="a">cgwrk</subfield><subfield code="d">20201028</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-101</subfield><subfield code="u">https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511509872</subfield><subfield code="l">BSB01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield><subfield code="q">BSB_PDA_CBO</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511509872</subfield><subfield code="l">UBG01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield><subfield code="q">UBG_PDA_CBO</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
geographic | USA USA (DE-588)4078704-7 gnd |
geographic_facet | USA |
id | DE-604.BV043929471 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-07-10T07:38:53Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 9780511509872 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029338550 |
oclc_num | 967422354 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-12 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG |
owner_facet | DE-12 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG |
physical | 1 online resource (xxi, 290 pages) |
psigel | ZDB-20-CBO ZDB-20-CBO BSB_PDA_CBO ZDB-20-CBO UBG_PDA_CBO |
publishDate | 2003 |
publishDateSearch | 2003 |
publishDateSort | 2003 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | marc |
spelling | Lovell, George I. Verfasser aut Legislative deferrals statutory ambiguity, judicial power, and American democracy George I. Lovell Cambridge Cambridge University Press 2003 1 online resource (xxi, 290 pages) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 08 Oct 2015) Rethinking judicial policy making in a separation of powers system -- False victories: labor, Congress, and the courts, 1898-1935 -- "As harmless as an infant": the Erdman Act in Congress and the courts -- Killing with kindness: legislative ambiguity, judicial policy making, and the Clayton Act -- The Norris-LaGuardia Act, for once: learning what to learn from the past -- Legislative deferrals and judicial policy making in the administrative state: a brief look at the Wagner Act Why do unelected federal judges have so much power to make policy in the United States? Why were federal judges able to thwart apparent legislative victories won by labor organizations in the Lochner era? Most scholars who have addressed such questions assume that the answer lies in the judiciary's constitutionally guaranteed independence, and thus worry that insulated judges threaten democracy when they stray from baseline positions chosen by legislators. This book argues for a fundamental shift in the way scholars think about judicial policy-making. Scholars need to notice that legislators also empower judges to make policy as a means of escaping accountability. This study of legislative deference to the courts offers a dramatic reinterpretation of the history of twentieth-century labor law and shows how attention to legislative deferrals can help scholars to address vexing questions about the consequences of judicial power in a democracy Political questions and judicial power / United States Judge-made law / United States Legislative power / United States Separation of powers / United States Gesetzgebung (DE-588)4020682-8 gnd rswk-swf Demokratie (DE-588)4011413-2 gnd rswk-swf USA USA (DE-588)4078704-7 gnd rswk-swf USA (DE-588)4078704-7 g Gesetzgebung (DE-588)4020682-8 s Demokratie (DE-588)4011413-2 s 1\p DE-604 Erscheint auch als Druckausgabe 978-0-521-16870-0 Erscheint auch als Druckausgabe 978-0-521-82415-6 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511509872 Verlag URL des Erstveröffentlichers Volltext 1\p cgwrk 20201028 DE-101 https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk |
spellingShingle | Lovell, George I. Legislative deferrals statutory ambiguity, judicial power, and American democracy Rethinking judicial policy making in a separation of powers system -- False victories: labor, Congress, and the courts, 1898-1935 -- "As harmless as an infant": the Erdman Act in Congress and the courts -- Killing with kindness: legislative ambiguity, judicial policy making, and the Clayton Act -- The Norris-LaGuardia Act, for once: learning what to learn from the past -- Legislative deferrals and judicial policy making in the administrative state: a brief look at the Wagner Act Political questions and judicial power / United States Judge-made law / United States Legislative power / United States Separation of powers / United States Gesetzgebung (DE-588)4020682-8 gnd Demokratie (DE-588)4011413-2 gnd |
subject_GND | (DE-588)4020682-8 (DE-588)4011413-2 (DE-588)4078704-7 |
title | Legislative deferrals statutory ambiguity, judicial power, and American democracy |
title_auth | Legislative deferrals statutory ambiguity, judicial power, and American democracy |
title_exact_search | Legislative deferrals statutory ambiguity, judicial power, and American democracy |
title_full | Legislative deferrals statutory ambiguity, judicial power, and American democracy George I. Lovell |
title_fullStr | Legislative deferrals statutory ambiguity, judicial power, and American democracy George I. Lovell |
title_full_unstemmed | Legislative deferrals statutory ambiguity, judicial power, and American democracy George I. Lovell |
title_short | Legislative deferrals |
title_sort | legislative deferrals statutory ambiguity judicial power and american democracy |
title_sub | statutory ambiguity, judicial power, and American democracy |
topic | Political questions and judicial power / United States Judge-made law / United States Legislative power / United States Separation of powers / United States Gesetzgebung (DE-588)4020682-8 gnd Demokratie (DE-588)4011413-2 gnd |
topic_facet | Political questions and judicial power / United States Judge-made law / United States Legislative power / United States Separation of powers / United States Gesetzgebung Demokratie USA |
url | https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511509872 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lovellgeorgei legislativedeferralsstatutoryambiguityjudicialpowerandamericandemocracy |