Rational choice and democratic deliberation: a theory of discourse failure
In public political deliberation, people will err and lie in accordance with definite patterns. Such discourse failure results from behavior that is both instrumentally and epistemically rational. The deliberative practices of a liberal democracy (let alone repressive or non-democratic societies) ca...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge
Cambridge University Press
2006
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | BSB01 UBG01 Volltext |
| Zusammenfassung: | In public political deliberation, people will err and lie in accordance with definite patterns. Such discourse failure results from behavior that is both instrumentally and epistemically rational. The deliberative practices of a liberal democracy (let alone repressive or non-democratic societies) cannot be improved so as to overcome the tendency for rational citizens to believe and say things at odds with reliable propositions of social science. The theory has several corollaries. One is that much contemporary political philosophy can be seen as an unsuccessful attempt to vindicate, on symbolic and moral grounds, the forms that discourse failure take on in public political deliberation. Another is that deliberative practices cannot be rescued even on non-epistemic grounds, such as social peace, impartiality, participation, and equality. To alleviate discourse failure, this 2006 book proposes to reduce the scope of majoritarian politics and enlarge markets |
| Beschreibung: | Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015) |
| Beschreibung: | 1 online resource (xi, 258 pages) |
| ISBN: | 9780511720178 |
| DOI: | 10.1017/CBO9780511720178 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV043927305 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 161202s2006 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9780511720178 |c Online |9 978-0-511-72017-8 | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/CBO9780511720178 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (ZDB-20-CBO)CR9780511720178 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)967417142 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV043927305 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-473 | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 321.801 |2 22 | |
| 084 | |a CC 7750 |0 (DE-625)17690: |2 rvk | ||
| 084 | |a MD 7200 |0 (DE-625)122538: |2 rvk | ||
| 084 | |a MR 5550 |0 (DE-625)123519: |2 rvk | ||
| 084 | |a MS 4500 |0 (DE-625)123704: |2 rvk | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Pincione, Guido |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Rational choice and democratic deliberation |b a theory of discourse failure |c Guido Pincione, Fernando R. Tesón |
| 246 | 1 | 3 | |a Rational Choice & Democratic Deliberation |
| 264 | 1 | |a Cambridge |b Cambridge University Press |c 2006 | |
| 300 | |a 1 online resource (xi, 258 pages) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015) | ||
| 505 | 8 | |a The allure of deliberation -- Rational choice and political discourse -- The epistemic argument for deliberation -- Political illiteracy : an illustration -- Discourse failure -- Patterns of political belief -- Discourse failure and cognitive psychology -- Persuasive definitions -- Discourse failure and desert -- The cost of dissent -- The rational choice framework -- Instrumental and epistemic rationality -- Rational choice and morality -- Why our argument is not ad hominem -- A note on empirical testing -- The resilience of discourse failure -- Reliable social science and opacity -- Deliberative institutions -- Good policies, bad reasons -- Shortcuts -- Deliberation, free speech, and truth -- Deliberation as a regulative ideal -- Deliberative democracy, Condorcet, and Bayes -- Symbolism in political argument -- Self-defeatingness as symbolism -- Symbolic behavior in politics -- Symbolic and causal utility: Nozick's challenge -- Symbolizing as the intended outcome -- | |
| 505 | 8 | |a Are self-defeating reformers rational? -- Why political deliberators appear to neglect consequences -- Discourse failure and political morality -- The moral turn -- Balancing, deontology, and the display test -- Direct involvement in evildoing -- Split responsibility -- Causal complexity in political argument -- Moral error -- Enforcement and causation -- A note on religious morality -- A note on the minimum wage and employment -- Types of discourse failure : a summary -- Non-epistemic defenses of deliberation -- Deliberation as the exercise of autonomy -- Sincerity in deliberation -- Deliberation and social conflict -- Deliberation and impartiality -- Deliberation, participation, and equality -- Is discourse failure always bad? -- Deliberation, consent, and majority rule -- Consent and reasonableness -- Deliberation, justice, and rights -- Deliberation and majority rule -- Vote indeterminacy -- The courtroom analogy -- Substantive principles and deliberative politics -- | |
| 505 | 8 | |a Overcoming discourse failure : voluntary communities -- A contractarian society -- Contracts and truth -- Contracts and compromise -- The paradox of contract -- Further objections and replies -- Discursive advantages of voluntary communities -- Loose ends | |
| 520 | |a In public political deliberation, people will err and lie in accordance with definite patterns. Such discourse failure results from behavior that is both instrumentally and epistemically rational. The deliberative practices of a liberal democracy (let alone repressive or non-democratic societies) cannot be improved so as to overcome the tendency for rational citizens to believe and say things at odds with reliable propositions of social science. The theory has several corollaries. One is that much contemporary political philosophy can be seen as an unsuccessful attempt to vindicate, on symbolic and moral grounds, the forms that discourse failure take on in public political deliberation. Another is that deliberative practices cannot be rescued even on non-epistemic grounds, such as social peace, impartiality, participation, and equality. To alleviate discourse failure, this 2006 book proposes to reduce the scope of majoritarian politics and enlarge markets | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Rational choice theory | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Deliberative democracy | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Diskurs |0 (DE-588)4012475-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Rational Choice |0 (DE-588)4274923-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Deliberative Demokratie |0 (DE-588)4671998-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Demokratie |0 (DE-588)4011413-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Demokratie |0 (DE-588)4011413-2 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Rational Choice |0 (DE-588)4274923-2 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Deliberative Demokratie |0 (DE-588)4671998-2 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |a Diskurs |0 (DE-588)4012475-7 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |8 1\p |5 DE-604 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Tesón, Fernando R. |d 1950- |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druckausgabe |z 978-0-521-17538-8 |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druckausgabe |z 978-0-521-86269-1 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511720178 |x Verlag |z URL des Erstveröffentlichers |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a ZDB-20-CBO | ||
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029336384 | ||
| 883 | 1 | |8 1\p |a cgwrk |d 20201028 |q DE-101 |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511720178 |l BSB01 |p ZDB-20-CBO |q BSB_PDA_CBO |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511720178 |l UBG01 |p ZDB-20-CBO |q UBG_PDA_CBO |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804176855929978880 |
|---|---|
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Pincione, Guido |
| author_facet | Pincione, Guido |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Pincione, Guido |
| author_variant | g p gp |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV043927305 |
| classification_rvk | CC 7750 MD 7200 MR 5550 MS 4500 |
| collection | ZDB-20-CBO |
| contents | The allure of deliberation -- Rational choice and political discourse -- The epistemic argument for deliberation -- Political illiteracy : an illustration -- Discourse failure -- Patterns of political belief -- Discourse failure and cognitive psychology -- Persuasive definitions -- Discourse failure and desert -- The cost of dissent -- The rational choice framework -- Instrumental and epistemic rationality -- Rational choice and morality -- Why our argument is not ad hominem -- A note on empirical testing -- The resilience of discourse failure -- Reliable social science and opacity -- Deliberative institutions -- Good policies, bad reasons -- Shortcuts -- Deliberation, free speech, and truth -- Deliberation as a regulative ideal -- Deliberative democracy, Condorcet, and Bayes -- Symbolism in political argument -- Self-defeatingness as symbolism -- Symbolic behavior in politics -- Symbolic and causal utility: Nozick's challenge -- Symbolizing as the intended outcome -- Are self-defeating reformers rational? -- Why political deliberators appear to neglect consequences -- Discourse failure and political morality -- The moral turn -- Balancing, deontology, and the display test -- Direct involvement in evildoing -- Split responsibility -- Causal complexity in political argument -- Moral error -- Enforcement and causation -- A note on religious morality -- A note on the minimum wage and employment -- Types of discourse failure : a summary -- Non-epistemic defenses of deliberation -- Deliberation as the exercise of autonomy -- Sincerity in deliberation -- Deliberation and social conflict -- Deliberation and impartiality -- Deliberation, participation, and equality -- Is discourse failure always bad? -- Deliberation, consent, and majority rule -- Consent and reasonableness -- Deliberation, justice, and rights -- Deliberation and majority rule -- Vote indeterminacy -- The courtroom analogy -- Substantive principles and deliberative politics -- Overcoming discourse failure : voluntary communities -- A contractarian society -- Contracts and truth -- Contracts and compromise -- The paradox of contract -- Further objections and replies -- Discursive advantages of voluntary communities -- Loose ends |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-20-CBO)CR9780511720178 (OCoLC)967417142 (DE-599)BVBBV043927305 |
| dewey-full | 321.801 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 321 - Systems of governments and states |
| dewey-raw | 321.801 |
| dewey-search | 321.801 |
| dewey-sort | 3321.801 |
| dewey-tens | 320 - Political science (Politics and government) |
| discipline | Politologie Soziologie Philosophie |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/CBO9780511720178 |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>05726nmm a2200637zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV043927305</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">161202s2006 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780511720178</subfield><subfield code="c">Online</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-511-72017-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1017/CBO9780511720178</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-20-CBO)CR9780511720178</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)967417142</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV043927305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">321.801</subfield><subfield code="2">22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">CC 7750</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)17690:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MD 7200</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)122538:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MR 5550</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)123519:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MS 4500</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)123704:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pincione, Guido</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Rational choice and democratic deliberation</subfield><subfield code="b">a theory of discourse failure</subfield><subfield code="c">Guido Pincione, Fernando R. Tesón</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="246" ind1="1" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Rational Choice & Democratic Deliberation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cambridge</subfield><subfield code="b">Cambridge University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (xi, 258 pages)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The allure of deliberation -- Rational choice and political discourse -- The epistemic argument for deliberation -- Political illiteracy : an illustration -- Discourse failure -- Patterns of political belief -- Discourse failure and cognitive psychology -- Persuasive definitions -- Discourse failure and desert -- The cost of dissent -- The rational choice framework -- Instrumental and epistemic rationality -- Rational choice and morality -- Why our argument is not ad hominem -- A note on empirical testing -- The resilience of discourse failure -- Reliable social science and opacity -- Deliberative institutions -- Good policies, bad reasons -- Shortcuts -- Deliberation, free speech, and truth -- Deliberation as a regulative ideal -- Deliberative democracy, Condorcet, and Bayes -- Symbolism in political argument -- Self-defeatingness as symbolism -- Symbolic behavior in politics -- Symbolic and causal utility: Nozick's challenge -- Symbolizing as the intended outcome -- </subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Are self-defeating reformers rational? -- Why political deliberators appear to neglect consequences -- Discourse failure and political morality -- The moral turn -- Balancing, deontology, and the display test -- Direct involvement in evildoing -- Split responsibility -- Causal complexity in political argument -- Moral error -- Enforcement and causation -- A note on religious morality -- A note on the minimum wage and employment -- Types of discourse failure : a summary -- Non-epistemic defenses of deliberation -- Deliberation as the exercise of autonomy -- Sincerity in deliberation -- Deliberation and social conflict -- Deliberation and impartiality -- Deliberation, participation, and equality -- Is discourse failure always bad? -- Deliberation, consent, and majority rule -- Consent and reasonableness -- Deliberation, justice, and rights -- Deliberation and majority rule -- Vote indeterminacy -- The courtroom analogy -- Substantive principles and deliberative politics -- </subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Overcoming discourse failure : voluntary communities -- A contractarian society -- Contracts and truth -- Contracts and compromise -- The paradox of contract -- Further objections and replies -- Discursive advantages of voluntary communities -- Loose ends</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In public political deliberation, people will err and lie in accordance with definite patterns. Such discourse failure results from behavior that is both instrumentally and epistemically rational. The deliberative practices of a liberal democracy (let alone repressive or non-democratic societies) cannot be improved so as to overcome the tendency for rational citizens to believe and say things at odds with reliable propositions of social science. The theory has several corollaries. One is that much contemporary political philosophy can be seen as an unsuccessful attempt to vindicate, on symbolic and moral grounds, the forms that discourse failure take on in public political deliberation. Another is that deliberative practices cannot be rescued even on non-epistemic grounds, such as social peace, impartiality, participation, and equality. To alleviate discourse failure, this 2006 book proposes to reduce the scope of majoritarian politics and enlarge markets</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Rational choice theory</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Deliberative democracy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Diskurs</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4012475-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rational Choice</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4274923-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Deliberative Demokratie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4671998-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Demokratie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4011413-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Demokratie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4011413-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Rational Choice</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4274923-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Deliberative Demokratie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4671998-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Diskurs</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4012475-7</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tesón, Fernando R.</subfield><subfield code="d">1950-</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druckausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">978-0-521-17538-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druckausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">978-0-521-86269-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511720178</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">URL des Erstveröffentlichers</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029336384</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="883" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="a">cgwrk</subfield><subfield code="d">20201028</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-101</subfield><subfield code="u">https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511720178</subfield><subfield code="l">BSB01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield><subfield code="q">BSB_PDA_CBO</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511720178</subfield><subfield code="l">UBG01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield><subfield code="q">UBG_PDA_CBO</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV043927305 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T07:38:49Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9780511720178 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029336384 |
| oclc_num | 967417142 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG |
| owner_facet | DE-12 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG |
| physical | 1 online resource (xi, 258 pages) |
| psigel | ZDB-20-CBO ZDB-20-CBO BSB_PDA_CBO ZDB-20-CBO UBG_PDA_CBO |
| publishDate | 2006 |
| publishDateSearch | 2006 |
| publishDateSort | 2006 |
| publisher | Cambridge University Press |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Pincione, Guido Verfasser aut Rational choice and democratic deliberation a theory of discourse failure Guido Pincione, Fernando R. Tesón Rational Choice & Democratic Deliberation Cambridge Cambridge University Press 2006 1 online resource (xi, 258 pages) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015) The allure of deliberation -- Rational choice and political discourse -- The epistemic argument for deliberation -- Political illiteracy : an illustration -- Discourse failure -- Patterns of political belief -- Discourse failure and cognitive psychology -- Persuasive definitions -- Discourse failure and desert -- The cost of dissent -- The rational choice framework -- Instrumental and epistemic rationality -- Rational choice and morality -- Why our argument is not ad hominem -- A note on empirical testing -- The resilience of discourse failure -- Reliable social science and opacity -- Deliberative institutions -- Good policies, bad reasons -- Shortcuts -- Deliberation, free speech, and truth -- Deliberation as a regulative ideal -- Deliberative democracy, Condorcet, and Bayes -- Symbolism in political argument -- Self-defeatingness as symbolism -- Symbolic behavior in politics -- Symbolic and causal utility: Nozick's challenge -- Symbolizing as the intended outcome -- Are self-defeating reformers rational? -- Why political deliberators appear to neglect consequences -- Discourse failure and political morality -- The moral turn -- Balancing, deontology, and the display test -- Direct involvement in evildoing -- Split responsibility -- Causal complexity in political argument -- Moral error -- Enforcement and causation -- A note on religious morality -- A note on the minimum wage and employment -- Types of discourse failure : a summary -- Non-epistemic defenses of deliberation -- Deliberation as the exercise of autonomy -- Sincerity in deliberation -- Deliberation and social conflict -- Deliberation and impartiality -- Deliberation, participation, and equality -- Is discourse failure always bad? -- Deliberation, consent, and majority rule -- Consent and reasonableness -- Deliberation, justice, and rights -- Deliberation and majority rule -- Vote indeterminacy -- The courtroom analogy -- Substantive principles and deliberative politics -- Overcoming discourse failure : voluntary communities -- A contractarian society -- Contracts and truth -- Contracts and compromise -- The paradox of contract -- Further objections and replies -- Discursive advantages of voluntary communities -- Loose ends In public political deliberation, people will err and lie in accordance with definite patterns. Such discourse failure results from behavior that is both instrumentally and epistemically rational. The deliberative practices of a liberal democracy (let alone repressive or non-democratic societies) cannot be improved so as to overcome the tendency for rational citizens to believe and say things at odds with reliable propositions of social science. The theory has several corollaries. One is that much contemporary political philosophy can be seen as an unsuccessful attempt to vindicate, on symbolic and moral grounds, the forms that discourse failure take on in public political deliberation. Another is that deliberative practices cannot be rescued even on non-epistemic grounds, such as social peace, impartiality, participation, and equality. To alleviate discourse failure, this 2006 book proposes to reduce the scope of majoritarian politics and enlarge markets Rational choice theory Deliberative democracy Diskurs (DE-588)4012475-7 gnd rswk-swf Rational Choice (DE-588)4274923-2 gnd rswk-swf Deliberative Demokratie (DE-588)4671998-2 gnd rswk-swf Demokratie (DE-588)4011413-2 gnd rswk-swf Demokratie (DE-588)4011413-2 s Rational Choice (DE-588)4274923-2 s Deliberative Demokratie (DE-588)4671998-2 s Diskurs (DE-588)4012475-7 s 1\p DE-604 Tesón, Fernando R. 1950- Sonstige oth Erscheint auch als Druckausgabe 978-0-521-17538-8 Erscheint auch als Druckausgabe 978-0-521-86269-1 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511720178 Verlag URL des Erstveröffentlichers Volltext 1\p cgwrk 20201028 DE-101 https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk |
| spellingShingle | Pincione, Guido Rational choice and democratic deliberation a theory of discourse failure The allure of deliberation -- Rational choice and political discourse -- The epistemic argument for deliberation -- Political illiteracy : an illustration -- Discourse failure -- Patterns of political belief -- Discourse failure and cognitive psychology -- Persuasive definitions -- Discourse failure and desert -- The cost of dissent -- The rational choice framework -- Instrumental and epistemic rationality -- Rational choice and morality -- Why our argument is not ad hominem -- A note on empirical testing -- The resilience of discourse failure -- Reliable social science and opacity -- Deliberative institutions -- Good policies, bad reasons -- Shortcuts -- Deliberation, free speech, and truth -- Deliberation as a regulative ideal -- Deliberative democracy, Condorcet, and Bayes -- Symbolism in political argument -- Self-defeatingness as symbolism -- Symbolic behavior in politics -- Symbolic and causal utility: Nozick's challenge -- Symbolizing as the intended outcome -- Are self-defeating reformers rational? -- Why political deliberators appear to neglect consequences -- Discourse failure and political morality -- The moral turn -- Balancing, deontology, and the display test -- Direct involvement in evildoing -- Split responsibility -- Causal complexity in political argument -- Moral error -- Enforcement and causation -- A note on religious morality -- A note on the minimum wage and employment -- Types of discourse failure : a summary -- Non-epistemic defenses of deliberation -- Deliberation as the exercise of autonomy -- Sincerity in deliberation -- Deliberation and social conflict -- Deliberation and impartiality -- Deliberation, participation, and equality -- Is discourse failure always bad? -- Deliberation, consent, and majority rule -- Consent and reasonableness -- Deliberation, justice, and rights -- Deliberation and majority rule -- Vote indeterminacy -- The courtroom analogy -- Substantive principles and deliberative politics -- Overcoming discourse failure : voluntary communities -- A contractarian society -- Contracts and truth -- Contracts and compromise -- The paradox of contract -- Further objections and replies -- Discursive advantages of voluntary communities -- Loose ends Rational choice theory Deliberative democracy Diskurs (DE-588)4012475-7 gnd Rational Choice (DE-588)4274923-2 gnd Deliberative Demokratie (DE-588)4671998-2 gnd Demokratie (DE-588)4011413-2 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4012475-7 (DE-588)4274923-2 (DE-588)4671998-2 (DE-588)4011413-2 |
| title | Rational choice and democratic deliberation a theory of discourse failure |
| title_alt | Rational Choice & Democratic Deliberation |
| title_auth | Rational choice and democratic deliberation a theory of discourse failure |
| title_exact_search | Rational choice and democratic deliberation a theory of discourse failure |
| title_full | Rational choice and democratic deliberation a theory of discourse failure Guido Pincione, Fernando R. Tesón |
| title_fullStr | Rational choice and democratic deliberation a theory of discourse failure Guido Pincione, Fernando R. Tesón |
| title_full_unstemmed | Rational choice and democratic deliberation a theory of discourse failure Guido Pincione, Fernando R. Tesón |
| title_short | Rational choice and democratic deliberation |
| title_sort | rational choice and democratic deliberation a theory of discourse failure |
| title_sub | a theory of discourse failure |
| topic | Rational choice theory Deliberative democracy Diskurs (DE-588)4012475-7 gnd Rational Choice (DE-588)4274923-2 gnd Deliberative Demokratie (DE-588)4671998-2 gnd Demokratie (DE-588)4011413-2 gnd |
| topic_facet | Rational choice theory Deliberative democracy Diskurs Rational Choice Deliberative Demokratie Demokratie |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511720178 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT pincioneguido rationalchoiceanddemocraticdeliberationatheoryofdiscoursefailure AT tesonfernandor rationalchoiceanddemocraticdeliberationatheoryofdiscoursefailure AT pincioneguido rationalchoicedemocraticdeliberation AT tesonfernandor rationalchoicedemocraticdeliberation |