Legal reason: the use of analogy in legal argument
Legal Reason describes and explains the process of analogical reasoning, which is the distinctive feature of legal argument. It challenges the prevailing view, urged by Edward Levi, Cass Sunstein, Richard Posner and others, which regards analogical reasoning as logically flawed or as a defective for...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge
Cambridge University Press
2005
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | BSB01 UBG01 URL des Erstveröffentlichers |
| Zusammenfassung: | Legal Reason describes and explains the process of analogical reasoning, which is the distinctive feature of legal argument. It challenges the prevailing view, urged by Edward Levi, Cass Sunstein, Richard Posner and others, which regards analogical reasoning as logically flawed or as a defective form of deductive reasoning. It shows that analogical reasoning in the law is the same as the reasoning used by all of us routinely in everyday life and that it is a valid form of reasoning derived from the innate human capacity to recognize the general in the particular, on which thought itself depends. The use of analogical reasoning is dictated by the nature of law, which requires the application of rules to particular facts. Written for scholars as well as students and persons generally who are interested in law, Legal Reason is written in clear, accessible prose, with many examples drawn from the law and from everyday experience |
| Beschreibung: | Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015) |
| Beschreibung: | 1 online resource (viii, 184 pages) |
| ISBN: | 9780511810053 |
| DOI: | 10.1017/CBO9780511810053 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV043924047 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 161202s2005 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9780511810053 |c Online |9 978-0-511-81005-3 | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/CBO9780511810053 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (ZDB-20-CBO)CR9780511810053 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)967410557 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV043924047 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-473 | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 340/.11 |2 22 | |
| 084 | |a PI 3020 |0 (DE-625)136586: |2 rvk | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Weinreb, Lloyd L. |d 1936- |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Legal reason |b the use of analogy in legal argument |c Lloyd L. Weinreb |
| 264 | 1 | |a Cambridge |b Cambridge University Press |c 2005 | |
| 300 | |a 1 online resource (viii, 184 pages) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015) | ||
| 505 | 8 | |a Analogy and inductive and deductive reasoning -- Steamboats, broadcast transmissions, and electronic eavesdropping -- Analogical legal reasoning -- Analogical reasoning, legal education and the law | |
| 520 | |a Legal Reason describes and explains the process of analogical reasoning, which is the distinctive feature of legal argument. It challenges the prevailing view, urged by Edward Levi, Cass Sunstein, Richard Posner and others, which regards analogical reasoning as logically flawed or as a defective form of deductive reasoning. It shows that analogical reasoning in the law is the same as the reasoning used by all of us routinely in everyday life and that it is a valid form of reasoning derived from the innate human capacity to recognize the general in the particular, on which thought itself depends. The use of analogical reasoning is dictated by the nature of law, which requires the application of rules to particular facts. Written for scholars as well as students and persons generally who are interested in law, Legal Reason is written in clear, accessible prose, with many examples drawn from the law and from everyday experience | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Recht | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Law / Methodology | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Juristische Methodik |0 (DE-588)4114116-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Analogie |0 (DE-588)4197814-6 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Juristische Argumentation |0 (DE-588)4129291-1 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Analogie |0 (DE-588)4197814-6 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Juristische Argumentation |0 (DE-588)4129291-1 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |8 1\p |5 DE-604 | |
| 689 | 1 | 0 | |a Analogie |0 (DE-588)4197814-6 |D s |
| 689 | 1 | 1 | |a Juristische Methodik |0 (DE-588)4114116-7 |D s |
| 689 | 1 | |8 2\p |5 DE-604 | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druckausgabe |z 978-0-521-61490-0 |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druckausgabe |z 978-0-521-84967-8 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511810053 |x Verlag |z URL des Erstveröffentlichers |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a ZDB-20-CBO | ||
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029333126 | ||
| 883 | 1 | |8 1\p |a cgwrk |d 20201028 |q DE-101 |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk | |
| 883 | 1 | |8 2\p |a cgwrk |d 20201028 |q DE-101 |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511810053 |l BSB01 |p ZDB-20-CBO |q BSB_PDA_CBO |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511810053 |l UBG01 |p ZDB-20-CBO |q UBG_PDA_CBO |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804176848873062400 |
|---|---|
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Weinreb, Lloyd L. 1936- |
| author_facet | Weinreb, Lloyd L. 1936- |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Weinreb, Lloyd L. 1936- |
| author_variant | l l w ll llw |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV043924047 |
| classification_rvk | PI 3020 |
| collection | ZDB-20-CBO |
| contents | Analogy and inductive and deductive reasoning -- Steamboats, broadcast transmissions, and electronic eavesdropping -- Analogical legal reasoning -- Analogical reasoning, legal education and the law |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-20-CBO)CR9780511810053 (OCoLC)967410557 (DE-599)BVBBV043924047 |
| dewey-full | 340/.11 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 340 - Law |
| dewey-raw | 340/.11 |
| dewey-search | 340/.11 |
| dewey-sort | 3340 211 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/CBO9780511810053 |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03395nmm a2200565zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV043924047</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">161202s2005 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780511810053</subfield><subfield code="c">Online</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-511-81005-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1017/CBO9780511810053</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-20-CBO)CR9780511810053</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)967410557</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV043924047</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">340/.11</subfield><subfield code="2">22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PI 3020</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)136586:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Weinreb, Lloyd L.</subfield><subfield code="d">1936-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Legal reason</subfield><subfield code="b">the use of analogy in legal argument</subfield><subfield code="c">Lloyd L. Weinreb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cambridge</subfield><subfield code="b">Cambridge University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (viii, 184 pages)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Analogy and inductive and deductive reasoning -- Steamboats, broadcast transmissions, and electronic eavesdropping -- Analogical legal reasoning -- Analogical reasoning, legal education and the law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Legal Reason describes and explains the process of analogical reasoning, which is the distinctive feature of legal argument. It challenges the prevailing view, urged by Edward Levi, Cass Sunstein, Richard Posner and others, which regards analogical reasoning as logically flawed or as a defective form of deductive reasoning. It shows that analogical reasoning in the law is the same as the reasoning used by all of us routinely in everyday life and that it is a valid form of reasoning derived from the innate human capacity to recognize the general in the particular, on which thought itself depends. The use of analogical reasoning is dictated by the nature of law, which requires the application of rules to particular facts. Written for scholars as well as students and persons generally who are interested in law, Legal Reason is written in clear, accessible prose, with many examples drawn from the law and from everyday experience</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Recht</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Law / Methodology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Juristische Methodik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4114116-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Analogie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4197814-6</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Juristische Argumentation</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4129291-1</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Analogie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4197814-6</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Juristische Argumentation</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4129291-1</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Analogie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4197814-6</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Juristische Methodik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4114116-7</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">2\p</subfield><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druckausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">978-0-521-61490-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druckausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">978-0-521-84967-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511810053</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">URL des Erstveröffentlichers</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029333126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="883" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="a">cgwrk</subfield><subfield code="d">20201028</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-101</subfield><subfield code="u">https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="883" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">2\p</subfield><subfield code="a">cgwrk</subfield><subfield code="d">20201028</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-101</subfield><subfield code="u">https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511810053</subfield><subfield code="l">BSB01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield><subfield code="q">BSB_PDA_CBO</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511810053</subfield><subfield code="l">UBG01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield><subfield code="q">UBG_PDA_CBO</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV043924047 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T07:38:42Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9780511810053 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029333126 |
| oclc_num | 967410557 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG |
| owner_facet | DE-12 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG |
| physical | 1 online resource (viii, 184 pages) |
| psigel | ZDB-20-CBO ZDB-20-CBO BSB_PDA_CBO ZDB-20-CBO UBG_PDA_CBO |
| publishDate | 2005 |
| publishDateSearch | 2005 |
| publishDateSort | 2005 |
| publisher | Cambridge University Press |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Weinreb, Lloyd L. 1936- Verfasser aut Legal reason the use of analogy in legal argument Lloyd L. Weinreb Cambridge Cambridge University Press 2005 1 online resource (viii, 184 pages) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015) Analogy and inductive and deductive reasoning -- Steamboats, broadcast transmissions, and electronic eavesdropping -- Analogical legal reasoning -- Analogical reasoning, legal education and the law Legal Reason describes and explains the process of analogical reasoning, which is the distinctive feature of legal argument. It challenges the prevailing view, urged by Edward Levi, Cass Sunstein, Richard Posner and others, which regards analogical reasoning as logically flawed or as a defective form of deductive reasoning. It shows that analogical reasoning in the law is the same as the reasoning used by all of us routinely in everyday life and that it is a valid form of reasoning derived from the innate human capacity to recognize the general in the particular, on which thought itself depends. The use of analogical reasoning is dictated by the nature of law, which requires the application of rules to particular facts. Written for scholars as well as students and persons generally who are interested in law, Legal Reason is written in clear, accessible prose, with many examples drawn from the law and from everyday experience Recht Law / Methodology Juristische Methodik (DE-588)4114116-7 gnd rswk-swf Analogie (DE-588)4197814-6 gnd rswk-swf Juristische Argumentation (DE-588)4129291-1 gnd rswk-swf Analogie (DE-588)4197814-6 s Juristische Argumentation (DE-588)4129291-1 s 1\p DE-604 Juristische Methodik (DE-588)4114116-7 s 2\p DE-604 Erscheint auch als Druckausgabe 978-0-521-61490-0 Erscheint auch als Druckausgabe 978-0-521-84967-8 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511810053 Verlag URL des Erstveröffentlichers Volltext 1\p cgwrk 20201028 DE-101 https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk 2\p cgwrk 20201028 DE-101 https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk |
| spellingShingle | Weinreb, Lloyd L. 1936- Legal reason the use of analogy in legal argument Analogy and inductive and deductive reasoning -- Steamboats, broadcast transmissions, and electronic eavesdropping -- Analogical legal reasoning -- Analogical reasoning, legal education and the law Recht Law / Methodology Juristische Methodik (DE-588)4114116-7 gnd Analogie (DE-588)4197814-6 gnd Juristische Argumentation (DE-588)4129291-1 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4114116-7 (DE-588)4197814-6 (DE-588)4129291-1 |
| title | Legal reason the use of analogy in legal argument |
| title_auth | Legal reason the use of analogy in legal argument |
| title_exact_search | Legal reason the use of analogy in legal argument |
| title_full | Legal reason the use of analogy in legal argument Lloyd L. Weinreb |
| title_fullStr | Legal reason the use of analogy in legal argument Lloyd L. Weinreb |
| title_full_unstemmed | Legal reason the use of analogy in legal argument Lloyd L. Weinreb |
| title_short | Legal reason |
| title_sort | legal reason the use of analogy in legal argument |
| title_sub | the use of analogy in legal argument |
| topic | Recht Law / Methodology Juristische Methodik (DE-588)4114116-7 gnd Analogie (DE-588)4197814-6 gnd Juristische Argumentation (DE-588)4129291-1 gnd |
| topic_facet | Recht Law / Methodology Juristische Methodik Analogie Juristische Argumentation |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511810053 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT weinreblloydl legalreasontheuseofanalogyinlegalargument |