The framework of judicial sentencing: a study in legal decision making
Austin Lovegrove examines the sentencing of offenders appearing on multiple offences and how judges, having fixed a prison sentence for each offence, determine an overall sentence for each offender. Analysing judges' verbal protocols for sentencing problems and sentences for fictitious cases, h...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge
Cambridge University Press
1997
|
Schriftenreihe: | Cambridge studies in criminology
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | BSB01 UBG01 URL des Erstveröffentlichers |
Zusammenfassung: | Austin Lovegrove examines the sentencing of offenders appearing on multiple offences and how judges, having fixed a prison sentence for each offence, determine an overall sentence for each offender. Analysing judges' verbal protocols for sentencing problems and sentences for fictitious cases, he is able to offer, first, a model of judicial sentencing in the form of a decision strategy comprising working rules deduced from the given responses of judges as they attempted to apply sentencing law, and, second, a numerical guideline in the form of an algebraic model quantifying the application of the working rules. On the basis of this empirical data, Dr Lovegrove furthers understanding of the nature and place of intuition in sentencing and of how the cumulation of sentence can be integrated into a system of proportionality related to the seriousness of single offences |
Beschreibung: | Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015) |
Beschreibung: | 1 online resource (xiii, 280 pages) |
ISBN: | 9780511520969 |
DOI: | 10.1017/CBO9780511520969 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV043921836 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 161202s1997 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
020 | |a 9780511520969 |c Online |9 978-0-511-52096-9 | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/CBO9780511520969 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (ZDB-20-CBO)CR9780511520969 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)967405992 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV043921836 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-473 | ||
082 | 0 | |a 345.41/05 |2 20 | |
084 | |a PH 6165 |0 (DE-625)136408:406 |2 rvk | ||
100 | 1 | |a Lovegrove, Austin |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a The framework of judicial sentencing |b a study in legal decision making |c Austin Lovegrove |
264 | 1 | |a Cambridge |b Cambridge University Press |c 1997 | |
300 | |a 1 online resource (xiii, 280 pages) | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 0 | |a Cambridge studies in criminology | |
500 | |a Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015) | ||
505 | 8 | |a Judicial decision making and sentencing policy: continuation of a study -- A sentencing decision model: single and multiple similar counts -- Multiple disparate counts -- Testing the decision model for multiple disparate counts -- The techniques of data collection -- Judges' thoughts on sentencing the multiple offender -- An alternative sentencing decision model for the multiple offender -- Validity and development of the alternative decision model: the data collection -- Towards a requisite decision model for sentencing the multiple offender -- The armature of judicial sentencing | |
520 | |a Austin Lovegrove examines the sentencing of offenders appearing on multiple offences and how judges, having fixed a prison sentence for each offence, determine an overall sentence for each offender. Analysing judges' verbal protocols for sentencing problems and sentences for fictitious cases, he is able to offer, first, a model of judicial sentencing in the form of a decision strategy comprising working rules deduced from the given responses of judges as they attempted to apply sentencing law, and, second, a numerical guideline in the form of an algebraic model quantifying the application of the working rules. On the basis of this empirical data, Dr Lovegrove furthers understanding of the nature and place of intuition in sentencing and of how the cumulation of sentence can be integrated into a system of proportionality related to the seriousness of single offences | ||
650 | 4 | |a Sentences (Criminal procedure) / Great Britain / Decision making | |
650 | 4 | |a Judicial discretion / Great Britain | |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Strafurteil |0 (DE-588)4077939-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Entscheidungsprozess |0 (DE-588)4121202-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
651 | 4 | |a Großbritannien | |
651 | 7 | |a Großbritannien |0 (DE-588)4022153-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
689 | 0 | 0 | |a Großbritannien |0 (DE-588)4022153-2 |D g |
689 | 0 | 1 | |a Strafurteil |0 (DE-588)4077939-7 |D s |
689 | 0 | 2 | |a Entscheidungsprozess |0 (DE-588)4121202-2 |D s |
689 | 0 | |8 1\p |5 DE-604 | |
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druckausgabe |z 978-0-521-03256-8 |
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druckausgabe |z 978-0-521-58427-2 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511520969 |x Verlag |z URL des Erstveröffentlichers |3 Volltext |
912 | |a ZDB-20-CBO | ||
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029330918 | ||
883 | 1 | |8 1\p |a cgwrk |d 20201028 |q DE-101 |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk | |
966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511520969 |l BSB01 |p ZDB-20-CBO |q BSB_PDA_CBO |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511520969 |l UBG01 |p ZDB-20-CBO |q UBG_PDA_CBO |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804176844376768512 |
---|---|
any_adam_object | |
author | Lovegrove, Austin |
author_facet | Lovegrove, Austin |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Lovegrove, Austin |
author_variant | a l al |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV043921836 |
classification_rvk | PH 6165 |
collection | ZDB-20-CBO |
contents | Judicial decision making and sentencing policy: continuation of a study -- A sentencing decision model: single and multiple similar counts -- Multiple disparate counts -- Testing the decision model for multiple disparate counts -- The techniques of data collection -- Judges' thoughts on sentencing the multiple offender -- An alternative sentencing decision model for the multiple offender -- Validity and development of the alternative decision model: the data collection -- Towards a requisite decision model for sentencing the multiple offender -- The armature of judicial sentencing |
ctrlnum | (ZDB-20-CBO)CR9780511520969 (OCoLC)967405992 (DE-599)BVBBV043921836 |
dewey-full | 345.41/05 |
dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
dewey-ones | 345 - Criminal law |
dewey-raw | 345.41/05 |
dewey-search | 345.41/05 |
dewey-sort | 3345.41 15 |
dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/CBO9780511520969 |
format | Electronic eBook |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03728nmm a2200553zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV043921836</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">161202s1997 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780511520969</subfield><subfield code="c">Online</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-511-52096-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1017/CBO9780511520969</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-20-CBO)CR9780511520969</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)967405992</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV043921836</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">345.41/05</subfield><subfield code="2">20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PH 6165</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)136408:406</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lovegrove, Austin</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The framework of judicial sentencing</subfield><subfield code="b">a study in legal decision making</subfield><subfield code="c">Austin Lovegrove</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cambridge</subfield><subfield code="b">Cambridge University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">1997</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (xiii, 280 pages)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cambridge studies in criminology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Judicial decision making and sentencing policy: continuation of a study -- A sentencing decision model: single and multiple similar counts -- Multiple disparate counts -- Testing the decision model for multiple disparate counts -- The techniques of data collection -- Judges' thoughts on sentencing the multiple offender -- An alternative sentencing decision model for the multiple offender -- Validity and development of the alternative decision model: the data collection -- Towards a requisite decision model for sentencing the multiple offender -- The armature of judicial sentencing</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Austin Lovegrove examines the sentencing of offenders appearing on multiple offences and how judges, having fixed a prison sentence for each offence, determine an overall sentence for each offender. Analysing judges' verbal protocols for sentencing problems and sentences for fictitious cases, he is able to offer, first, a model of judicial sentencing in the form of a decision strategy comprising working rules deduced from the given responses of judges as they attempted to apply sentencing law, and, second, a numerical guideline in the form of an algebraic model quantifying the application of the working rules. On the basis of this empirical data, Dr Lovegrove furthers understanding of the nature and place of intuition in sentencing and of how the cumulation of sentence can be integrated into a system of proportionality related to the seriousness of single offences</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Sentences (Criminal procedure) / Great Britain / Decision making</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Judicial discretion / Great Britain</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Strafurteil</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4077939-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Entscheidungsprozess</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4121202-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Großbritannien</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Großbritannien</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4022153-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Großbritannien</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4022153-2</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Strafurteil</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4077939-7</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Entscheidungsprozess</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4121202-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druckausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">978-0-521-03256-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druckausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">978-0-521-58427-2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511520969</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">URL des Erstveröffentlichers</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029330918</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="883" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="a">cgwrk</subfield><subfield code="d">20201028</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-101</subfield><subfield code="u">https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511520969</subfield><subfield code="l">BSB01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield><subfield code="q">BSB_PDA_CBO</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511520969</subfield><subfield code="l">UBG01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield><subfield code="q">UBG_PDA_CBO</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
geographic | Großbritannien Großbritannien (DE-588)4022153-2 gnd |
geographic_facet | Großbritannien |
id | DE-604.BV043921836 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-07-10T07:38:38Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 9780511520969 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029330918 |
oclc_num | 967405992 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-12 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG |
owner_facet | DE-12 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG |
physical | 1 online resource (xiii, 280 pages) |
psigel | ZDB-20-CBO ZDB-20-CBO BSB_PDA_CBO ZDB-20-CBO UBG_PDA_CBO |
publishDate | 1997 |
publishDateSearch | 1997 |
publishDateSort | 1997 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | marc |
series2 | Cambridge studies in criminology |
spelling | Lovegrove, Austin Verfasser aut The framework of judicial sentencing a study in legal decision making Austin Lovegrove Cambridge Cambridge University Press 1997 1 online resource (xiii, 280 pages) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Cambridge studies in criminology Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015) Judicial decision making and sentencing policy: continuation of a study -- A sentencing decision model: single and multiple similar counts -- Multiple disparate counts -- Testing the decision model for multiple disparate counts -- The techniques of data collection -- Judges' thoughts on sentencing the multiple offender -- An alternative sentencing decision model for the multiple offender -- Validity and development of the alternative decision model: the data collection -- Towards a requisite decision model for sentencing the multiple offender -- The armature of judicial sentencing Austin Lovegrove examines the sentencing of offenders appearing on multiple offences and how judges, having fixed a prison sentence for each offence, determine an overall sentence for each offender. Analysing judges' verbal protocols for sentencing problems and sentences for fictitious cases, he is able to offer, first, a model of judicial sentencing in the form of a decision strategy comprising working rules deduced from the given responses of judges as they attempted to apply sentencing law, and, second, a numerical guideline in the form of an algebraic model quantifying the application of the working rules. On the basis of this empirical data, Dr Lovegrove furthers understanding of the nature and place of intuition in sentencing and of how the cumulation of sentence can be integrated into a system of proportionality related to the seriousness of single offences Sentences (Criminal procedure) / Great Britain / Decision making Judicial discretion / Great Britain Strafurteil (DE-588)4077939-7 gnd rswk-swf Entscheidungsprozess (DE-588)4121202-2 gnd rswk-swf Großbritannien Großbritannien (DE-588)4022153-2 gnd rswk-swf Großbritannien (DE-588)4022153-2 g Strafurteil (DE-588)4077939-7 s Entscheidungsprozess (DE-588)4121202-2 s 1\p DE-604 Erscheint auch als Druckausgabe 978-0-521-03256-8 Erscheint auch als Druckausgabe 978-0-521-58427-2 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511520969 Verlag URL des Erstveröffentlichers Volltext 1\p cgwrk 20201028 DE-101 https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk |
spellingShingle | Lovegrove, Austin The framework of judicial sentencing a study in legal decision making Judicial decision making and sentencing policy: continuation of a study -- A sentencing decision model: single and multiple similar counts -- Multiple disparate counts -- Testing the decision model for multiple disparate counts -- The techniques of data collection -- Judges' thoughts on sentencing the multiple offender -- An alternative sentencing decision model for the multiple offender -- Validity and development of the alternative decision model: the data collection -- Towards a requisite decision model for sentencing the multiple offender -- The armature of judicial sentencing Sentences (Criminal procedure) / Great Britain / Decision making Judicial discretion / Great Britain Strafurteil (DE-588)4077939-7 gnd Entscheidungsprozess (DE-588)4121202-2 gnd |
subject_GND | (DE-588)4077939-7 (DE-588)4121202-2 (DE-588)4022153-2 |
title | The framework of judicial sentencing a study in legal decision making |
title_auth | The framework of judicial sentencing a study in legal decision making |
title_exact_search | The framework of judicial sentencing a study in legal decision making |
title_full | The framework of judicial sentencing a study in legal decision making Austin Lovegrove |
title_fullStr | The framework of judicial sentencing a study in legal decision making Austin Lovegrove |
title_full_unstemmed | The framework of judicial sentencing a study in legal decision making Austin Lovegrove |
title_short | The framework of judicial sentencing |
title_sort | the framework of judicial sentencing a study in legal decision making |
title_sub | a study in legal decision making |
topic | Sentences (Criminal procedure) / Great Britain / Decision making Judicial discretion / Great Britain Strafurteil (DE-588)4077939-7 gnd Entscheidungsprozess (DE-588)4121202-2 gnd |
topic_facet | Sentences (Criminal procedure) / Great Britain / Decision making Judicial discretion / Great Britain Strafurteil Entscheidungsprozess Großbritannien |
url | https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511520969 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lovegroveaustin theframeworkofjudicialsentencingastudyinlegaldecisionmaking |