Moral combat:
This book explores the thesis that legal roles force people to engage in moral combat, an idea which is implicit in the assumption that citizens may be morally required to disobey unjust laws, while judges may be morally required to punish citizens for civil disobedience. Heidi Hurd advances the sur...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge
Cambridge University Press
1999
|
| Schriftenreihe: | Cambridge studies in philosophy and law
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | DE-12 DE-473 Volltext |
| Zusammenfassung: | This book explores the thesis that legal roles force people to engage in moral combat, an idea which is implicit in the assumption that citizens may be morally required to disobey unjust laws, while judges may be morally required to punish citizens for civil disobedience. Heidi Hurd advances the surprising argument that the law cannot require us to do what morality forbids. The 'role-relative' understanding of morality is shown to be incompatible with both consequentialist and deontological moral philosophies. In the end, Hurd shows that our best moral theory is one which never makes one actor's moral success turn on another's moral failure. Moral Combat is a sophisticated, well-conceived and carefully argued book on a very important and controversial topic at the junction between legal and political philosophy. It will be of interest to moral, legal, and political philosophers, as well as teachers and students of professional ethics in law |
| Beschreibung: | Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015) |
| Beschreibung: | 1 online resource (xvii, 348 pages) |
| ISBN: | 9780511896880 |
| DOI: | 10.1017/CBO9780511896880 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV043921754 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 161202s1999 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9780511896880 |c Online |9 978-0-511-89688-0 | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/CBO9780511896880 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (ZDB-20-CBO)CR9780511896880 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)967406055 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV043921754 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-473 | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 340/.112 |2 21 | |
| 084 | |a CC 7200 |0 (DE-625)17672: |2 rvk | ||
| 084 | |a PI 3520 |0 (DE-625)136610: |2 rvk | ||
| 084 | |a PI 3580 |0 (DE-625)136613: |2 rvk | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Hurd, Heidi M. |d 1960- |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Moral combat |c Heidi M. Hurd |
| 264 | 1 | |a Cambridge |b Cambridge University Press |c 1999 | |
| 300 | |a 1 online resource (xvii, 348 pages) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a Cambridge studies in philosophy and law | |
| 500 | |a Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015) | ||
| 505 | 8 | |a I: The dilemma of legal perspectivalism -- The incompatibility of weak retributivism, the rule of law, and the separation of powers -- II: Sources of the dilemma of legal perspectivalism -- The rejection of moral relativism -- The indefensibility of practical authority -- The failure of influential authority -- The limits of advisory authority -- A defense of theoretical authority -- III: The moral case for legal perspectivalism -- Practical errors: pragmatic foundations for legal perspectivalism -- The rule of law values: principled foundations for judicial perspectivalism -- The values of democracy and the separation of powers: principled foundations for constitutional perspectivalism -- IV: The moral case against legal perspectivalism -- Consequentialism and moral correspondence -- Deontology and moral correspondence -- V: Resolving the dilemma of legal perspectivalism -- Legal practices without moral combat | |
| 520 | |a This book explores the thesis that legal roles force people to engage in moral combat, an idea which is implicit in the assumption that citizens may be morally required to disobey unjust laws, while judges may be morally required to punish citizens for civil disobedience. Heidi Hurd advances the surprising argument that the law cannot require us to do what morality forbids. The 'role-relative' understanding of morality is shown to be incompatible with both consequentialist and deontological moral philosophies. In the end, Hurd shows that our best moral theory is one which never makes one actor's moral success turn on another's moral failure. Moral Combat is a sophisticated, well-conceived and carefully argued book on a very important and controversial topic at the junction between legal and political philosophy. It will be of interest to moral, legal, and political philosophers, as well as teachers and students of professional ethics in law | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Law and ethics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Ethical relativism | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Rechtsethik |0 (DE-588)4177216-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Rechtsethik |0 (DE-588)4177216-7 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |8 1\p |5 DE-604 | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druckausgabe |z 978-0-521-08999-9 |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druckausgabe |z 978-0-521-64224-8 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511896880 |x Verlag |z URL des Erstveröffentlichers |3 Volltext |
| 883 | 1 | |8 1\p |a cgwrk |d 20201028 |q DE-101 |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk | |
| 912 | |a ZDB-20-CBO | ||
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029330836 | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511896880 |l DE-12 |p ZDB-20-CBO |q BSB_PDA_CBO |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511896880 |l DE-473 |p ZDB-20-CBO |q UBG_PDA_CBO |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1811004106693672960 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | |
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Hurd, Heidi M. 1960- |
| author_facet | Hurd, Heidi M. 1960- |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Hurd, Heidi M. 1960- |
| author_variant | h m h hm hmh |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV043921754 |
| classification_rvk | CC 7200 PI 3520 PI 3580 |
| collection | ZDB-20-CBO |
| contents | I: The dilemma of legal perspectivalism -- The incompatibility of weak retributivism, the rule of law, and the separation of powers -- II: Sources of the dilemma of legal perspectivalism -- The rejection of moral relativism -- The indefensibility of practical authority -- The failure of influential authority -- The limits of advisory authority -- A defense of theoretical authority -- III: The moral case for legal perspectivalism -- Practical errors: pragmatic foundations for legal perspectivalism -- The rule of law values: principled foundations for judicial perspectivalism -- The values of democracy and the separation of powers: principled foundations for constitutional perspectivalism -- IV: The moral case against legal perspectivalism -- Consequentialism and moral correspondence -- Deontology and moral correspondence -- V: Resolving the dilemma of legal perspectivalism -- Legal practices without moral combat |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-20-CBO)CR9780511896880 (OCoLC)967406055 (DE-599)BVBBV043921754 |
| dewey-full | 340/.112 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 340 - Law |
| dewey-raw | 340/.112 |
| dewey-search | 340/.112 |
| dewey-sort | 3340 3112 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft Philosophie |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/CBO9780511896880 |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nmm a2200000zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV043921754</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">161202s1999 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780511896880</subfield><subfield code="c">Online</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-511-89688-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1017/CBO9780511896880</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-20-CBO)CR9780511896880</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)967406055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV043921754</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">340/.112</subfield><subfield code="2">21</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">CC 7200</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)17672:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PI 3520</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)136610:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PI 3580</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)136613:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hurd, Heidi M.</subfield><subfield code="d">1960-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Moral combat</subfield><subfield code="c">Heidi M. Hurd</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cambridge</subfield><subfield code="b">Cambridge University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">1999</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (xvii, 348 pages)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cambridge studies in philosophy and law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">I: The dilemma of legal perspectivalism -- The incompatibility of weak retributivism, the rule of law, and the separation of powers -- II: Sources of the dilemma of legal perspectivalism -- The rejection of moral relativism -- The indefensibility of practical authority -- The failure of influential authority -- The limits of advisory authority -- A defense of theoretical authority -- III: The moral case for legal perspectivalism -- Practical errors: pragmatic foundations for legal perspectivalism -- The rule of law values: principled foundations for judicial perspectivalism -- The values of democracy and the separation of powers: principled foundations for constitutional perspectivalism -- IV: The moral case against legal perspectivalism -- Consequentialism and moral correspondence -- Deontology and moral correspondence -- V: Resolving the dilemma of legal perspectivalism -- Legal practices without moral combat</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This book explores the thesis that legal roles force people to engage in moral combat, an idea which is implicit in the assumption that citizens may be morally required to disobey unjust laws, while judges may be morally required to punish citizens for civil disobedience. Heidi Hurd advances the surprising argument that the law cannot require us to do what morality forbids. The 'role-relative' understanding of morality is shown to be incompatible with both consequentialist and deontological moral philosophies. In the end, Hurd shows that our best moral theory is one which never makes one actor's moral success turn on another's moral failure. Moral Combat is a sophisticated, well-conceived and carefully argued book on a very important and controversial topic at the junction between legal and political philosophy. It will be of interest to moral, legal, and political philosophers, as well as teachers and students of professional ethics in law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Law and ethics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Ethical relativism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rechtsethik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4177216-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Rechtsethik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4177216-7</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druckausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">978-0-521-08999-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druckausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">978-0-521-64224-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511896880</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">URL des Erstveröffentlichers</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="883" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="a">cgwrk</subfield><subfield code="d">20201028</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-101</subfield><subfield code="u">https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029330836</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511896880</subfield><subfield code="l">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield><subfield code="q">BSB_PDA_CBO</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511896880</subfield><subfield code="l">DE-473</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield><subfield code="q">UBG_PDA_CBO</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV043921754 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-09-23T16:15:03Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9780511896880 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029330836 |
| oclc_num | 967406055 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG |
| owner_facet | DE-12 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG |
| physical | 1 online resource (xvii, 348 pages) |
| psigel | ZDB-20-CBO ZDB-20-CBO BSB_PDA_CBO ZDB-20-CBO UBG_PDA_CBO |
| publishDate | 1999 |
| publishDateSearch | 1999 |
| publishDateSort | 1999 |
| publisher | Cambridge University Press |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | Cambridge studies in philosophy and law |
| spelling | Hurd, Heidi M. 1960- Verfasser aut Moral combat Heidi M. Hurd Cambridge Cambridge University Press 1999 1 online resource (xvii, 348 pages) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Cambridge studies in philosophy and law Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015) I: The dilemma of legal perspectivalism -- The incompatibility of weak retributivism, the rule of law, and the separation of powers -- II: Sources of the dilemma of legal perspectivalism -- The rejection of moral relativism -- The indefensibility of practical authority -- The failure of influential authority -- The limits of advisory authority -- A defense of theoretical authority -- III: The moral case for legal perspectivalism -- Practical errors: pragmatic foundations for legal perspectivalism -- The rule of law values: principled foundations for judicial perspectivalism -- The values of democracy and the separation of powers: principled foundations for constitutional perspectivalism -- IV: The moral case against legal perspectivalism -- Consequentialism and moral correspondence -- Deontology and moral correspondence -- V: Resolving the dilemma of legal perspectivalism -- Legal practices without moral combat This book explores the thesis that legal roles force people to engage in moral combat, an idea which is implicit in the assumption that citizens may be morally required to disobey unjust laws, while judges may be morally required to punish citizens for civil disobedience. Heidi Hurd advances the surprising argument that the law cannot require us to do what morality forbids. The 'role-relative' understanding of morality is shown to be incompatible with both consequentialist and deontological moral philosophies. In the end, Hurd shows that our best moral theory is one which never makes one actor's moral success turn on another's moral failure. Moral Combat is a sophisticated, well-conceived and carefully argued book on a very important and controversial topic at the junction between legal and political philosophy. It will be of interest to moral, legal, and political philosophers, as well as teachers and students of professional ethics in law Law and ethics Ethical relativism Rechtsethik (DE-588)4177216-7 gnd rswk-swf Rechtsethik (DE-588)4177216-7 s 1\p DE-604 Erscheint auch als Druckausgabe 978-0-521-08999-9 Erscheint auch als Druckausgabe 978-0-521-64224-8 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511896880 Verlag URL des Erstveröffentlichers Volltext 1\p cgwrk 20201028 DE-101 https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk |
| spellingShingle | Hurd, Heidi M. 1960- Moral combat I: The dilemma of legal perspectivalism -- The incompatibility of weak retributivism, the rule of law, and the separation of powers -- II: Sources of the dilemma of legal perspectivalism -- The rejection of moral relativism -- The indefensibility of practical authority -- The failure of influential authority -- The limits of advisory authority -- A defense of theoretical authority -- III: The moral case for legal perspectivalism -- Practical errors: pragmatic foundations for legal perspectivalism -- The rule of law values: principled foundations for judicial perspectivalism -- The values of democracy and the separation of powers: principled foundations for constitutional perspectivalism -- IV: The moral case against legal perspectivalism -- Consequentialism and moral correspondence -- Deontology and moral correspondence -- V: Resolving the dilemma of legal perspectivalism -- Legal practices without moral combat Law and ethics Ethical relativism Rechtsethik (DE-588)4177216-7 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4177216-7 |
| title | Moral combat |
| title_auth | Moral combat |
| title_exact_search | Moral combat |
| title_full | Moral combat Heidi M. Hurd |
| title_fullStr | Moral combat Heidi M. Hurd |
| title_full_unstemmed | Moral combat Heidi M. Hurd |
| title_short | Moral combat |
| title_sort | moral combat |
| topic | Law and ethics Ethical relativism Rechtsethik (DE-588)4177216-7 gnd |
| topic_facet | Law and ethics Ethical relativism Rechtsethik |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511896880 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT hurdheidim moralcombat |