Three anarchical fallacies: an essay on political authority
How is a legitimate state possible? Obedience, coercion and intrusion are three ideas that seem inseparable from all government and seem to render state authority presumptively illegitimate. This book exposes three fallacies inspired by these ideas and in doing so challenges assumptions shared by li...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge
Cambridge University Press
1998
|
Schriftenreihe: | Cambridge studies in philosophy and law
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | BSB01 UBG01 URL des Erstveröffentlichers |
Zusammenfassung: | How is a legitimate state possible? Obedience, coercion and intrusion are three ideas that seem inseparable from all government and seem to render state authority presumptively illegitimate. This book exposes three fallacies inspired by these ideas and in doing so challenges assumptions shared by liberals, libertarians, cultural conservatives, moderates and Marxists. In three clear and tightly argued essays William Edmundson dispels these fallacies and shows that living in a just state remains a worthy ideal. This is an important book for all philosophers, political scientists and legal theorists as well as other readers interested in the views of Rawls, Dworkin and Nozick, many of whose central ideas are subjected to rigorous critique |
Beschreibung: | Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015) |
Beschreibung: | 1 online resource (xi, 192 pages) |
ISBN: | 9780511663741 |
DOI: | 10.1017/CBO9780511663741 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV043921488 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 161202s1998 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
020 | |a 9780511663741 |c Online |9 978-0-511-66374-1 | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/CBO9780511663741 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (ZDB-20-CBO)CR9780511663741 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)967407305 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV043921488 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-473 | ||
082 | 0 | |a 306.2 |2 21 | |
084 | |a MD 3550 |0 (DE-625)122504: |2 rvk | ||
100 | 1 | |a Edmundson, William A. |d 1948- |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Three anarchical fallacies |b an essay on political authority |c William A. Edmundson |
264 | 1 | |a Cambridge |b Cambridge University Press |c 1998 | |
300 | |a 1 online resource (xi, 192 pages) | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 0 | |a Cambridge studies in philosophy and law | |
500 | |a Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015) | ||
505 | 8 | |a pt. 1: The fallacious argument from the failure of political obligation: Legitimacy and the duty to obey -- The correlativity thesis -- Legitimate political authority. pt. 2: The 'law is coercive" fallacy: The concept of coercion -- Political theory without coercion -- Coercion redivivus. pt. 3: The inner sphere of privacy fallacy: The private sphere -- The moral and the social -- The social and the political. CONCLUSION: The state for what? | |
520 | |a How is a legitimate state possible? Obedience, coercion and intrusion are three ideas that seem inseparable from all government and seem to render state authority presumptively illegitimate. This book exposes three fallacies inspired by these ideas and in doing so challenges assumptions shared by liberals, libertarians, cultural conservatives, moderates and Marxists. In three clear and tightly argued essays William Edmundson dispels these fallacies and shows that living in a just state remains a worthy ideal. This is an important book for all philosophers, political scientists and legal theorists as well as other readers interested in the views of Rawls, Dworkin and Nozick, many of whose central ideas are subjected to rigorous critique | ||
650 | 4 | |a Legitimacy of governments | |
650 | 4 | |a Authority | |
650 | 4 | |a Political obligation | |
650 | 4 | |a Anarchism | |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Politik |0 (DE-588)4046514-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Staat |0 (DE-588)4056618-3 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Legitimität |0 (DE-588)4035043-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Autorität |0 (DE-588)4003990-0 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
689 | 0 | 0 | |a Staat |0 (DE-588)4056618-3 |D s |
689 | 0 | 1 | |a Autorität |0 (DE-588)4003990-0 |D s |
689 | 0 | 2 | |a Politik |0 (DE-588)4046514-7 |D s |
689 | 0 | |8 1\p |5 DE-604 | |
689 | 1 | 0 | |a Legitimität |0 (DE-588)4035043-5 |D s |
689 | 1 | |8 2\p |5 DE-604 | |
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druckausgabe |z 978-0-521-03751-8 |
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druckausgabe |z 978-0-521-62454-1 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511663741 |x Verlag |z URL des Erstveröffentlichers |3 Volltext |
912 | |a ZDB-20-CBO | ||
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029330571 | ||
883 | 1 | |8 1\p |a cgwrk |d 20201028 |q DE-101 |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk | |
883 | 1 | |8 2\p |a cgwrk |d 20201028 |q DE-101 |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk | |
966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511663741 |l BSB01 |p ZDB-20-CBO |q BSB_PDA_CBO |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511663741 |l UBG01 |p ZDB-20-CBO |q UBG_PDA_CBO |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804176843698339840 |
---|---|
any_adam_object | |
author | Edmundson, William A. 1948- |
author_facet | Edmundson, William A. 1948- |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Edmundson, William A. 1948- |
author_variant | w a e wa wae |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV043921488 |
classification_rvk | MD 3550 |
collection | ZDB-20-CBO |
contents | pt. 1: The fallacious argument from the failure of political obligation: Legitimacy and the duty to obey -- The correlativity thesis -- Legitimate political authority. pt. 2: The 'law is coercive" fallacy: The concept of coercion -- Political theory without coercion -- Coercion redivivus. pt. 3: The inner sphere of privacy fallacy: The private sphere -- The moral and the social -- The social and the political. CONCLUSION: The state for what? |
ctrlnum | (ZDB-20-CBO)CR9780511663741 (OCoLC)967407305 (DE-599)BVBBV043921488 |
dewey-full | 306.2 |
dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
dewey-ones | 306 - Culture and institutions |
dewey-raw | 306.2 |
dewey-search | 306.2 |
dewey-sort | 3306.2 |
dewey-tens | 300 - Social sciences |
discipline | Soziologie Politologie |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/CBO9780511663741 |
format | Electronic eBook |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03599nmm a2200613zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV043921488</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">161202s1998 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780511663741</subfield><subfield code="c">Online</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-511-66374-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1017/CBO9780511663741</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-20-CBO)CR9780511663741</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)967407305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV043921488</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">306.2</subfield><subfield code="2">21</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MD 3550</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)122504:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Edmundson, William A.</subfield><subfield code="d">1948-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Three anarchical fallacies</subfield><subfield code="b">an essay on political authority</subfield><subfield code="c">William A. Edmundson</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cambridge</subfield><subfield code="b">Cambridge University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">1998</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (xi, 192 pages)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cambridge studies in philosophy and law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">pt. 1: The fallacious argument from the failure of political obligation: Legitimacy and the duty to obey -- The correlativity thesis -- Legitimate political authority. pt. 2: The 'law is coercive" fallacy: The concept of coercion -- Political theory without coercion -- Coercion redivivus. pt. 3: The inner sphere of privacy fallacy: The private sphere -- The moral and the social -- The social and the political. CONCLUSION: The state for what?</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">How is a legitimate state possible? Obedience, coercion and intrusion are three ideas that seem inseparable from all government and seem to render state authority presumptively illegitimate. This book exposes three fallacies inspired by these ideas and in doing so challenges assumptions shared by liberals, libertarians, cultural conservatives, moderates and Marxists. In three clear and tightly argued essays William Edmundson dispels these fallacies and shows that living in a just state remains a worthy ideal. This is an important book for all philosophers, political scientists and legal theorists as well as other readers interested in the views of Rawls, Dworkin and Nozick, many of whose central ideas are subjected to rigorous critique</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Legitimacy of governments</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Authority</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Political obligation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Anarchism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Politik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4046514-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Staat</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4056618-3</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Legitimität</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4035043-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Autorität</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4003990-0</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Staat</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4056618-3</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Autorität</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4003990-0</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Politik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4046514-7</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Legitimität</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4035043-5</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">2\p</subfield><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druckausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">978-0-521-03751-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druckausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">978-0-521-62454-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511663741</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">URL des Erstveröffentlichers</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029330571</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="883" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="a">cgwrk</subfield><subfield code="d">20201028</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-101</subfield><subfield code="u">https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="883" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">2\p</subfield><subfield code="a">cgwrk</subfield><subfield code="d">20201028</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-101</subfield><subfield code="u">https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511663741</subfield><subfield code="l">BSB01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield><subfield code="q">BSB_PDA_CBO</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511663741</subfield><subfield code="l">UBG01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield><subfield code="q">UBG_PDA_CBO</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV043921488 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-07-10T07:38:38Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 9780511663741 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029330571 |
oclc_num | 967407305 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-12 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG |
owner_facet | DE-12 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG |
physical | 1 online resource (xi, 192 pages) |
psigel | ZDB-20-CBO ZDB-20-CBO BSB_PDA_CBO ZDB-20-CBO UBG_PDA_CBO |
publishDate | 1998 |
publishDateSearch | 1998 |
publishDateSort | 1998 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | marc |
series2 | Cambridge studies in philosophy and law |
spelling | Edmundson, William A. 1948- Verfasser aut Three anarchical fallacies an essay on political authority William A. Edmundson Cambridge Cambridge University Press 1998 1 online resource (xi, 192 pages) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Cambridge studies in philosophy and law Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015) pt. 1: The fallacious argument from the failure of political obligation: Legitimacy and the duty to obey -- The correlativity thesis -- Legitimate political authority. pt. 2: The 'law is coercive" fallacy: The concept of coercion -- Political theory without coercion -- Coercion redivivus. pt. 3: The inner sphere of privacy fallacy: The private sphere -- The moral and the social -- The social and the political. CONCLUSION: The state for what? How is a legitimate state possible? Obedience, coercion and intrusion are three ideas that seem inseparable from all government and seem to render state authority presumptively illegitimate. This book exposes three fallacies inspired by these ideas and in doing so challenges assumptions shared by liberals, libertarians, cultural conservatives, moderates and Marxists. In three clear and tightly argued essays William Edmundson dispels these fallacies and shows that living in a just state remains a worthy ideal. This is an important book for all philosophers, political scientists and legal theorists as well as other readers interested in the views of Rawls, Dworkin and Nozick, many of whose central ideas are subjected to rigorous critique Legitimacy of governments Authority Political obligation Anarchism Politik (DE-588)4046514-7 gnd rswk-swf Staat (DE-588)4056618-3 gnd rswk-swf Legitimität (DE-588)4035043-5 gnd rswk-swf Autorität (DE-588)4003990-0 gnd rswk-swf Staat (DE-588)4056618-3 s Autorität (DE-588)4003990-0 s Politik (DE-588)4046514-7 s 1\p DE-604 Legitimität (DE-588)4035043-5 s 2\p DE-604 Erscheint auch als Druckausgabe 978-0-521-03751-8 Erscheint auch als Druckausgabe 978-0-521-62454-1 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511663741 Verlag URL des Erstveröffentlichers Volltext 1\p cgwrk 20201028 DE-101 https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk 2\p cgwrk 20201028 DE-101 https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk |
spellingShingle | Edmundson, William A. 1948- Three anarchical fallacies an essay on political authority pt. 1: The fallacious argument from the failure of political obligation: Legitimacy and the duty to obey -- The correlativity thesis -- Legitimate political authority. pt. 2: The 'law is coercive" fallacy: The concept of coercion -- Political theory without coercion -- Coercion redivivus. pt. 3: The inner sphere of privacy fallacy: The private sphere -- The moral and the social -- The social and the political. CONCLUSION: The state for what? Legitimacy of governments Authority Political obligation Anarchism Politik (DE-588)4046514-7 gnd Staat (DE-588)4056618-3 gnd Legitimität (DE-588)4035043-5 gnd Autorität (DE-588)4003990-0 gnd |
subject_GND | (DE-588)4046514-7 (DE-588)4056618-3 (DE-588)4035043-5 (DE-588)4003990-0 |
title | Three anarchical fallacies an essay on political authority |
title_auth | Three anarchical fallacies an essay on political authority |
title_exact_search | Three anarchical fallacies an essay on political authority |
title_full | Three anarchical fallacies an essay on political authority William A. Edmundson |
title_fullStr | Three anarchical fallacies an essay on political authority William A. Edmundson |
title_full_unstemmed | Three anarchical fallacies an essay on political authority William A. Edmundson |
title_short | Three anarchical fallacies |
title_sort | three anarchical fallacies an essay on political authority |
title_sub | an essay on political authority |
topic | Legitimacy of governments Authority Political obligation Anarchism Politik (DE-588)4046514-7 gnd Staat (DE-588)4056618-3 gnd Legitimität (DE-588)4035043-5 gnd Autorität (DE-588)4003990-0 gnd |
topic_facet | Legitimacy of governments Authority Political obligation Anarchism Politik Staat Legitimität Autorität |
url | https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511663741 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT edmundsonwilliama threeanarchicalfallaciesanessayonpoliticalauthority |