Evaluating scientific evidence: an interdisciplinary framework for intellectual due process
Scientific evidence is crucial in a burgeoning number of litigated cases, legislative enactments, regulatory decisions, and scholarly arguments. Evaluating Scientific Evidence explores the question of what counts as scientific knowledge, a question that has become a focus of heated courtroom and sch...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge
Cambridge University Press
2007
|
| Schriftenreihe: | Law in context
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | BSB01 UBG01 URL des Erstveröffentlichers |
| Zusammenfassung: | Scientific evidence is crucial in a burgeoning number of litigated cases, legislative enactments, regulatory decisions, and scholarly arguments. Evaluating Scientific Evidence explores the question of what counts as scientific knowledge, a question that has become a focus of heated courtroom and scholarly debate, not only in the United States, but in other common law countries such as the United Kingdom, Canada and Australia. Controversies are rife over what is permissible use of genetic information, whether chemical exposure causes disease, whether future dangerousness of violent or sexual offenders can be predicted, whether such time-honored methods of criminal identification (such as microscopic hair analysis, for example) have any better foundation than ancient divination rituals, among other important topics. This book examines the process of evaluating scientific evidence in both civil and criminal contexts, and explains how decisions by nonscientists that embody scientific knowledge can be improved |
| Beschreibung: | Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015) |
| Beschreibung: | 1 online resource (xi, 254 pages) |
| ISBN: | 9780511607448 |
| DOI: | 10.1017/CBO9780511607448 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV043918976 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 161202s2007 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9780511607448 |c Online |9 978-0-511-60744-8 | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/CBO9780511607448 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (ZDB-20-CBO)CR9780511607448 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)967399325 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV043918976 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-473 | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 347.73/67 |2 22 | |
| 084 | |a PH 6405 |0 (DE-625)136436:406 |2 rvk | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Beecher-Monas, Erica |d 1949- |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Evaluating scientific evidence |b an interdisciplinary framework for intellectual due process |c Erica Beecher-Monas |
| 264 | 1 | |a Cambridge |b Cambridge University Press |c 2007 | |
| 300 | |a 1 online resource (xi, 254 pages) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a Law in context | |
| 500 | |a Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015) | ||
| 505 | 8 | |a Triers of science -- Intellectual due process -- A framework of analysis -- Toxic torts and the causation conundrum -- Criminal identification evidence -- Future dangerousness testimony : the epistemology of prediction -- Barefoot or Daubert? : a cognitive perspective on vetting future -- Dangerousness testimony -- Future dangerousness and sexual offenders -- Models of rationality : evaluating social psychology -- Evaluating battered woman syndrome | |
| 520 | |a Scientific evidence is crucial in a burgeoning number of litigated cases, legislative enactments, regulatory decisions, and scholarly arguments. Evaluating Scientific Evidence explores the question of what counts as scientific knowledge, a question that has become a focus of heated courtroom and scholarly debate, not only in the United States, but in other common law countries such as the United Kingdom, Canada and Australia. Controversies are rife over what is permissible use of genetic information, whether chemical exposure causes disease, whether future dangerousness of violent or sexual offenders can be predicted, whether such time-honored methods of criminal identification (such as microscopic hair analysis, for example) have any better foundation than ancient divination rituals, among other important topics. This book examines the process of evaluating scientific evidence in both civil and criminal contexts, and explains how decisions by nonscientists that embody scientific knowledge can be improved | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Evidence, Expert / United States | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Forensic sciences / United States | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Evidence, Expert | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Forensic sciences | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Beweismittel |0 (DE-588)4145175-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Strafverfahrensrecht |0 (DE-588)4116635-8 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Beweisführung |0 (DE-588)4227233-6 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 4 | |a USA | |
| 651 | 7 | |a USA |0 (DE-588)4078704-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a USA |0 (DE-588)4078704-7 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Beweismittel |0 (DE-588)4145175-2 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Beweisführung |0 (DE-588)4227233-6 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |a Strafverfahrensrecht |0 (DE-588)4116635-8 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |8 1\p |5 DE-604 | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druckausgabe |z 978-0-521-67655-7 |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druckausgabe |z 978-0-521-85927-1 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607448 |x Verlag |z URL des Erstveröffentlichers |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a ZDB-20-CBO | ||
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029328057 | ||
| 883 | 1 | |8 1\p |a cgwrk |d 20201028 |q DE-101 |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607448 |l BSB01 |p ZDB-20-CBO |q BSB_PDA_CBO |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607448 |l UBG01 |p ZDB-20-CBO |q UBG_PDA_CBO |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804176837948997632 |
|---|---|
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Beecher-Monas, Erica 1949- |
| author_facet | Beecher-Monas, Erica 1949- |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Beecher-Monas, Erica 1949- |
| author_variant | e b m ebm |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV043918976 |
| classification_rvk | PH 6405 |
| collection | ZDB-20-CBO |
| contents | Triers of science -- Intellectual due process -- A framework of analysis -- Toxic torts and the causation conundrum -- Criminal identification evidence -- Future dangerousness testimony : the epistemology of prediction -- Barefoot or Daubert? : a cognitive perspective on vetting future -- Dangerousness testimony -- Future dangerousness and sexual offenders -- Models of rationality : evaluating social psychology -- Evaluating battered woman syndrome |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-20-CBO)CR9780511607448 (OCoLC)967399325 (DE-599)BVBBV043918976 |
| dewey-full | 347.73/67 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 347 - Procedure and courts |
| dewey-raw | 347.73/67 |
| dewey-search | 347.73/67 |
| dewey-sort | 3347.73 267 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/CBO9780511607448 |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03864nmm a2200601zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV043918976</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">161202s2007 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780511607448</subfield><subfield code="c">Online</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-511-60744-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1017/CBO9780511607448</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-20-CBO)CR9780511607448</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)967399325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV043918976</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">347.73/67</subfield><subfield code="2">22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PH 6405</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)136436:406</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Beecher-Monas, Erica</subfield><subfield code="d">1949-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Evaluating scientific evidence</subfield><subfield code="b">an interdisciplinary framework for intellectual due process</subfield><subfield code="c">Erica Beecher-Monas</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cambridge</subfield><subfield code="b">Cambridge University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (xi, 254 pages)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Law in context</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Triers of science -- Intellectual due process -- A framework of analysis -- Toxic torts and the causation conundrum -- Criminal identification evidence -- Future dangerousness testimony : the epistemology of prediction -- Barefoot or Daubert? : a cognitive perspective on vetting future -- Dangerousness testimony -- Future dangerousness and sexual offenders -- Models of rationality : evaluating social psychology -- Evaluating battered woman syndrome</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Scientific evidence is crucial in a burgeoning number of litigated cases, legislative enactments, regulatory decisions, and scholarly arguments. Evaluating Scientific Evidence explores the question of what counts as scientific knowledge, a question that has become a focus of heated courtroom and scholarly debate, not only in the United States, but in other common law countries such as the United Kingdom, Canada and Australia. Controversies are rife over what is permissible use of genetic information, whether chemical exposure causes disease, whether future dangerousness of violent or sexual offenders can be predicted, whether such time-honored methods of criminal identification (such as microscopic hair analysis, for example) have any better foundation than ancient divination rituals, among other important topics. This book examines the process of evaluating scientific evidence in both civil and criminal contexts, and explains how decisions by nonscientists that embody scientific knowledge can be improved</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Evidence, Expert / United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Forensic sciences / United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Evidence, Expert</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Forensic sciences</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Beweismittel</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4145175-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Strafverfahrensrecht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4116635-8</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Beweisführung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4227233-6</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078704-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078704-7</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Beweismittel</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4145175-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Beweisführung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4227233-6</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Strafverfahrensrecht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4116635-8</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druckausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">978-0-521-67655-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druckausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">978-0-521-85927-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607448</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">URL des Erstveröffentlichers</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029328057</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="883" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="a">cgwrk</subfield><subfield code="d">20201028</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-101</subfield><subfield code="u">https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607448</subfield><subfield code="l">BSB01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield><subfield code="q">BSB_PDA_CBO</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607448</subfield><subfield code="l">UBG01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield><subfield code="q">UBG_PDA_CBO</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | USA USA (DE-588)4078704-7 gnd |
| geographic_facet | USA |
| id | DE-604.BV043918976 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T07:38:32Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9780511607448 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029328057 |
| oclc_num | 967399325 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG |
| owner_facet | DE-12 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG |
| physical | 1 online resource (xi, 254 pages) |
| psigel | ZDB-20-CBO ZDB-20-CBO BSB_PDA_CBO ZDB-20-CBO UBG_PDA_CBO |
| publishDate | 2007 |
| publishDateSearch | 2007 |
| publishDateSort | 2007 |
| publisher | Cambridge University Press |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | Law in context |
| spelling | Beecher-Monas, Erica 1949- Verfasser aut Evaluating scientific evidence an interdisciplinary framework for intellectual due process Erica Beecher-Monas Cambridge Cambridge University Press 2007 1 online resource (xi, 254 pages) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Law in context Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015) Triers of science -- Intellectual due process -- A framework of analysis -- Toxic torts and the causation conundrum -- Criminal identification evidence -- Future dangerousness testimony : the epistemology of prediction -- Barefoot or Daubert? : a cognitive perspective on vetting future -- Dangerousness testimony -- Future dangerousness and sexual offenders -- Models of rationality : evaluating social psychology -- Evaluating battered woman syndrome Scientific evidence is crucial in a burgeoning number of litigated cases, legislative enactments, regulatory decisions, and scholarly arguments. Evaluating Scientific Evidence explores the question of what counts as scientific knowledge, a question that has become a focus of heated courtroom and scholarly debate, not only in the United States, but in other common law countries such as the United Kingdom, Canada and Australia. Controversies are rife over what is permissible use of genetic information, whether chemical exposure causes disease, whether future dangerousness of violent or sexual offenders can be predicted, whether such time-honored methods of criminal identification (such as microscopic hair analysis, for example) have any better foundation than ancient divination rituals, among other important topics. This book examines the process of evaluating scientific evidence in both civil and criminal contexts, and explains how decisions by nonscientists that embody scientific knowledge can be improved Evidence, Expert / United States Forensic sciences / United States Evidence, Expert Forensic sciences Beweismittel (DE-588)4145175-2 gnd rswk-swf Strafverfahrensrecht (DE-588)4116635-8 gnd rswk-swf Beweisführung (DE-588)4227233-6 gnd rswk-swf USA USA (DE-588)4078704-7 gnd rswk-swf USA (DE-588)4078704-7 g Beweismittel (DE-588)4145175-2 s Beweisführung (DE-588)4227233-6 s Strafverfahrensrecht (DE-588)4116635-8 s 1\p DE-604 Erscheint auch als Druckausgabe 978-0-521-67655-7 Erscheint auch als Druckausgabe 978-0-521-85927-1 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607448 Verlag URL des Erstveröffentlichers Volltext 1\p cgwrk 20201028 DE-101 https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk |
| spellingShingle | Beecher-Monas, Erica 1949- Evaluating scientific evidence an interdisciplinary framework for intellectual due process Triers of science -- Intellectual due process -- A framework of analysis -- Toxic torts and the causation conundrum -- Criminal identification evidence -- Future dangerousness testimony : the epistemology of prediction -- Barefoot or Daubert? : a cognitive perspective on vetting future -- Dangerousness testimony -- Future dangerousness and sexual offenders -- Models of rationality : evaluating social psychology -- Evaluating battered woman syndrome Evidence, Expert / United States Forensic sciences / United States Evidence, Expert Forensic sciences Beweismittel (DE-588)4145175-2 gnd Strafverfahrensrecht (DE-588)4116635-8 gnd Beweisführung (DE-588)4227233-6 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4145175-2 (DE-588)4116635-8 (DE-588)4227233-6 (DE-588)4078704-7 |
| title | Evaluating scientific evidence an interdisciplinary framework for intellectual due process |
| title_auth | Evaluating scientific evidence an interdisciplinary framework for intellectual due process |
| title_exact_search | Evaluating scientific evidence an interdisciplinary framework for intellectual due process |
| title_full | Evaluating scientific evidence an interdisciplinary framework for intellectual due process Erica Beecher-Monas |
| title_fullStr | Evaluating scientific evidence an interdisciplinary framework for intellectual due process Erica Beecher-Monas |
| title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating scientific evidence an interdisciplinary framework for intellectual due process Erica Beecher-Monas |
| title_short | Evaluating scientific evidence |
| title_sort | evaluating scientific evidence an interdisciplinary framework for intellectual due process |
| title_sub | an interdisciplinary framework for intellectual due process |
| topic | Evidence, Expert / United States Forensic sciences / United States Evidence, Expert Forensic sciences Beweismittel (DE-588)4145175-2 gnd Strafverfahrensrecht (DE-588)4116635-8 gnd Beweisführung (DE-588)4227233-6 gnd |
| topic_facet | Evidence, Expert / United States Forensic sciences / United States Evidence, Expert Forensic sciences Beweismittel Strafverfahrensrecht Beweisführung USA |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607448 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT beechermonaserica evaluatingscientificevidenceaninterdisciplinaryframeworkforintellectualdueprocess |