Balancing constitutional rights: the origins and meanings of postwar legal discourse
The language of balancing is pervasive in constitutional rights jurisprudence around the world. In this book, Jacco Bomhoff offers a comparative and historical account of the origins and meanings of this talismanic form of language, and of the legal discourse to which it is central. Contemporary dis...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge
Cambridge University Press
2013
|
Schriftenreihe: | Cambridge studies in constitutional law
10 |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | BSB01 UBG01 URL des Erstveröffentlichers |
Zusammenfassung: | The language of balancing is pervasive in constitutional rights jurisprudence around the world. In this book, Jacco Bomhoff offers a comparative and historical account of the origins and meanings of this talismanic form of language, and of the legal discourse to which it is central. Contemporary discussion has tended to see the increasing use of balancing as the manifestation of a globalization of constitutional law. This book is the first to argue that 'balancing' has always meant radically different things in different settings. Bomhoff uses detailed case studies of early post-war US and German constitutional jurisprudence to show that the same unique language expresses both biting scepticism and profound faith in law and adjudication, and both deep pessimism and high aspirations for constitutional rights. An understanding of these radically different meanings is essential for any evaluation of the work of constitutional courts today |
Beschreibung: | Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015) |
Beschreibung: | 1 online resource (viii, 280 pages) |
ISBN: | 9781107360280 |
DOI: | 10.1017/CBO9781107360280 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zcb4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV043918456 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 161202s2013 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
020 | |a 9781107360280 |c Online |9 978-1-107-36028-0 | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/CBO9781107360280 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (ZDB-20-CBO)CR9781107360280 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)870181500 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV043918456 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-473 | ||
082 | 0 | |a 342.08/5 |2 23 | |
084 | |a PL 625 |0 (DE-625)137089: |2 rvk | ||
100 | 1 | |a Bomhoff, J. |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Balancing constitutional rights |b the origins and meanings of postwar legal discourse |c Jacco Bomhoff |
264 | 1 | |a Cambridge |b Cambridge University Press |c 2013 | |
300 | |a 1 online resource (viii, 280 pages) | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 0 | |a Cambridge studies in constitutional law |v 10 | |
500 | |a Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015) | ||
505 | 8 | |a Questioning a global age of balancing -- Balancing's beginnings : concepts and interests -- A perfect constitutional order : balancing in German constitutional jurisprudence of the 1950s and 1960s -- A dangerous doctrine : balancing in US constitutional jurisprudence of the 1950s and 1960s -- Two paradigms of balancing | |
520 | |a The language of balancing is pervasive in constitutional rights jurisprudence around the world. In this book, Jacco Bomhoff offers a comparative and historical account of the origins and meanings of this talismanic form of language, and of the legal discourse to which it is central. Contemporary discussion has tended to see the increasing use of balancing as the manifestation of a globalization of constitutional law. This book is the first to argue that 'balancing' has always meant radically different things in different settings. Bomhoff uses detailed case studies of early post-war US and German constitutional jurisprudence to show that the same unique language expresses both biting scepticism and profound faith in law and adjudication, and both deep pessimism and high aspirations for constitutional rights. An understanding of these radically different meanings is essential for any evaluation of the work of constitutional courts today | ||
648 | 7 | |a Geschichte 1950-1970 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
650 | 4 | |a Philosophie | |
650 | 4 | |a Verfassungsrecht | |
650 | 4 | |a Proportionality in law | |
650 | 4 | |a Constitutional law | |
650 | 4 | |a Civil rights | |
650 | 4 | |a Jurisprudence / Philosophy | |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Grundrecht |0 (DE-588)4022344-9 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Rechtstheorie |0 (DE-588)4126505-1 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Verhältnismäßigkeitsgrundsatz |0 (DE-588)4191765-0 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Verfassungsrecht |0 (DE-588)4062801-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
651 | 7 | |a USA |0 (DE-588)4078704-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
651 | 7 | |a Deutschland |0 (DE-588)4011882-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
689 | 0 | 0 | |a USA |0 (DE-588)4078704-7 |D g |
689 | 0 | 1 | |a Deutschland |0 (DE-588)4011882-4 |D g |
689 | 0 | 2 | |a Verfassungsrecht |0 (DE-588)4062801-2 |D s |
689 | 0 | 3 | |a Grundrecht |0 (DE-588)4022344-9 |D s |
689 | 0 | 4 | |a Rechtstheorie |0 (DE-588)4126505-1 |D s |
689 | 0 | 5 | |a Verhältnismäßigkeitsgrundsatz |0 (DE-588)4191765-0 |D s |
689 | 0 | 6 | |a Geschichte 1950-1970 |A z |
689 | 0 | |8 1\p |5 DE-604 | |
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druckausgabe |z 978-1-107-04441-8 |
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druckausgabe |z 978-1-107-62248-7 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107360280 |x Verlag |z URL des Erstveröffentlichers |3 Volltext |
912 | |a ZDB-20-CBO | ||
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029327539 | ||
883 | 1 | |8 1\p |a cgwrk |d 20201028 |q DE-101 |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk | |
966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107360280 |l BSB01 |p ZDB-20-CBO |q BSB_PDA_CBO |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107360280 |l UBG01 |p ZDB-20-CBO |q UBG_PDA_CBO |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804176836844847104 |
---|---|
any_adam_object | |
author | Bomhoff, J. |
author_facet | Bomhoff, J. |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Bomhoff, J. |
author_variant | j b jb |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV043918456 |
classification_rvk | PL 625 |
collection | ZDB-20-CBO |
contents | Questioning a global age of balancing -- Balancing's beginnings : concepts and interests -- A perfect constitutional order : balancing in German constitutional jurisprudence of the 1950s and 1960s -- A dangerous doctrine : balancing in US constitutional jurisprudence of the 1950s and 1960s -- Two paradigms of balancing |
ctrlnum | (ZDB-20-CBO)CR9781107360280 (OCoLC)870181500 (DE-599)BVBBV043918456 |
dewey-full | 342.08/5 |
dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
dewey-ones | 342 - Constitutional and administrative law |
dewey-raw | 342.08/5 |
dewey-search | 342.08/5 |
dewey-sort | 3342.08 15 |
dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/CBO9781107360280 |
era | Geschichte 1950-1970 gnd |
era_facet | Geschichte 1950-1970 |
format | Electronic eBook |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>04023nmm a2200685zcb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV043918456</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">161202s2013 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781107360280</subfield><subfield code="c">Online</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-107-36028-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1017/CBO9781107360280</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-20-CBO)CR9781107360280</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)870181500</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV043918456</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">342.08/5</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PL 625</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)137089:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bomhoff, J.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Balancing constitutional rights</subfield><subfield code="b">the origins and meanings of postwar legal discourse</subfield><subfield code="c">Jacco Bomhoff</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cambridge</subfield><subfield code="b">Cambridge University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">2013</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (viii, 280 pages)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cambridge studies in constitutional law</subfield><subfield code="v">10</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Questioning a global age of balancing -- Balancing's beginnings : concepts and interests -- A perfect constitutional order : balancing in German constitutional jurisprudence of the 1950s and 1960s -- A dangerous doctrine : balancing in US constitutional jurisprudence of the 1950s and 1960s -- Two paradigms of balancing</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The language of balancing is pervasive in constitutional rights jurisprudence around the world. In this book, Jacco Bomhoff offers a comparative and historical account of the origins and meanings of this talismanic form of language, and of the legal discourse to which it is central. Contemporary discussion has tended to see the increasing use of balancing as the manifestation of a globalization of constitutional law. This book is the first to argue that 'balancing' has always meant radically different things in different settings. Bomhoff uses detailed case studies of early post-war US and German constitutional jurisprudence to show that the same unique language expresses both biting scepticism and profound faith in law and adjudication, and both deep pessimism and high aspirations for constitutional rights. An understanding of these radically different meanings is essential for any evaluation of the work of constitutional courts today</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="648" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Geschichte 1950-1970</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Philosophie</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Verfassungsrecht</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Proportionality in law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Constitutional law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Civil rights</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Jurisprudence / Philosophy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Grundrecht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4022344-9</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rechtstheorie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4126505-1</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Verhältnismäßigkeitsgrundsatz</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4191765-0</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Verfassungsrecht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4062801-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078704-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Deutschland</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4011882-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078704-7</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Deutschland</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4011882-4</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Verfassungsrecht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4062801-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Grundrecht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4022344-9</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Rechtstheorie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4126505-1</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="5"><subfield code="a">Verhältnismäßigkeitsgrundsatz</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4191765-0</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Geschichte 1950-1970</subfield><subfield code="A">z</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druckausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">978-1-107-04441-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druckausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">978-1-107-62248-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107360280</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">URL des Erstveröffentlichers</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029327539</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="883" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="a">cgwrk</subfield><subfield code="d">20201028</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-101</subfield><subfield code="u">https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107360280</subfield><subfield code="l">BSB01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield><subfield code="q">BSB_PDA_CBO</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107360280</subfield><subfield code="l">UBG01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield><subfield code="q">UBG_PDA_CBO</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
geographic | USA (DE-588)4078704-7 gnd Deutschland (DE-588)4011882-4 gnd |
geographic_facet | USA Deutschland |
id | DE-604.BV043918456 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-07-10T07:38:31Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 9781107360280 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029327539 |
oclc_num | 870181500 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-12 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG |
owner_facet | DE-12 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG |
physical | 1 online resource (viii, 280 pages) |
psigel | ZDB-20-CBO ZDB-20-CBO BSB_PDA_CBO ZDB-20-CBO UBG_PDA_CBO |
publishDate | 2013 |
publishDateSearch | 2013 |
publishDateSort | 2013 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | marc |
series2 | Cambridge studies in constitutional law |
spelling | Bomhoff, J. Verfasser aut Balancing constitutional rights the origins and meanings of postwar legal discourse Jacco Bomhoff Cambridge Cambridge University Press 2013 1 online resource (viii, 280 pages) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Cambridge studies in constitutional law 10 Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015) Questioning a global age of balancing -- Balancing's beginnings : concepts and interests -- A perfect constitutional order : balancing in German constitutional jurisprudence of the 1950s and 1960s -- A dangerous doctrine : balancing in US constitutional jurisprudence of the 1950s and 1960s -- Two paradigms of balancing The language of balancing is pervasive in constitutional rights jurisprudence around the world. In this book, Jacco Bomhoff offers a comparative and historical account of the origins and meanings of this talismanic form of language, and of the legal discourse to which it is central. Contemporary discussion has tended to see the increasing use of balancing as the manifestation of a globalization of constitutional law. This book is the first to argue that 'balancing' has always meant radically different things in different settings. Bomhoff uses detailed case studies of early post-war US and German constitutional jurisprudence to show that the same unique language expresses both biting scepticism and profound faith in law and adjudication, and both deep pessimism and high aspirations for constitutional rights. An understanding of these radically different meanings is essential for any evaluation of the work of constitutional courts today Geschichte 1950-1970 gnd rswk-swf Philosophie Verfassungsrecht Proportionality in law Constitutional law Civil rights Jurisprudence / Philosophy Grundrecht (DE-588)4022344-9 gnd rswk-swf Rechtstheorie (DE-588)4126505-1 gnd rswk-swf Verhältnismäßigkeitsgrundsatz (DE-588)4191765-0 gnd rswk-swf Verfassungsrecht (DE-588)4062801-2 gnd rswk-swf USA (DE-588)4078704-7 gnd rswk-swf Deutschland (DE-588)4011882-4 gnd rswk-swf USA (DE-588)4078704-7 g Deutschland (DE-588)4011882-4 g Verfassungsrecht (DE-588)4062801-2 s Grundrecht (DE-588)4022344-9 s Rechtstheorie (DE-588)4126505-1 s Verhältnismäßigkeitsgrundsatz (DE-588)4191765-0 s Geschichte 1950-1970 z 1\p DE-604 Erscheint auch als Druckausgabe 978-1-107-04441-8 Erscheint auch als Druckausgabe 978-1-107-62248-7 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107360280 Verlag URL des Erstveröffentlichers Volltext 1\p cgwrk 20201028 DE-101 https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk |
spellingShingle | Bomhoff, J. Balancing constitutional rights the origins and meanings of postwar legal discourse Questioning a global age of balancing -- Balancing's beginnings : concepts and interests -- A perfect constitutional order : balancing in German constitutional jurisprudence of the 1950s and 1960s -- A dangerous doctrine : balancing in US constitutional jurisprudence of the 1950s and 1960s -- Two paradigms of balancing Philosophie Verfassungsrecht Proportionality in law Constitutional law Civil rights Jurisprudence / Philosophy Grundrecht (DE-588)4022344-9 gnd Rechtstheorie (DE-588)4126505-1 gnd Verhältnismäßigkeitsgrundsatz (DE-588)4191765-0 gnd Verfassungsrecht (DE-588)4062801-2 gnd |
subject_GND | (DE-588)4022344-9 (DE-588)4126505-1 (DE-588)4191765-0 (DE-588)4062801-2 (DE-588)4078704-7 (DE-588)4011882-4 |
title | Balancing constitutional rights the origins and meanings of postwar legal discourse |
title_auth | Balancing constitutional rights the origins and meanings of postwar legal discourse |
title_exact_search | Balancing constitutional rights the origins and meanings of postwar legal discourse |
title_full | Balancing constitutional rights the origins and meanings of postwar legal discourse Jacco Bomhoff |
title_fullStr | Balancing constitutional rights the origins and meanings of postwar legal discourse Jacco Bomhoff |
title_full_unstemmed | Balancing constitutional rights the origins and meanings of postwar legal discourse Jacco Bomhoff |
title_short | Balancing constitutional rights |
title_sort | balancing constitutional rights the origins and meanings of postwar legal discourse |
title_sub | the origins and meanings of postwar legal discourse |
topic | Philosophie Verfassungsrecht Proportionality in law Constitutional law Civil rights Jurisprudence / Philosophy Grundrecht (DE-588)4022344-9 gnd Rechtstheorie (DE-588)4126505-1 gnd Verhältnismäßigkeitsgrundsatz (DE-588)4191765-0 gnd Verfassungsrecht (DE-588)4062801-2 gnd |
topic_facet | Philosophie Verfassungsrecht Proportionality in law Constitutional law Civil rights Jurisprudence / Philosophy Grundrecht Rechtstheorie Verhältnismäßigkeitsgrundsatz USA Deutschland |
url | https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107360280 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bomhoffj balancingconstitutionalrightstheoriginsandmeaningsofpostwarlegaldiscourse |