Punitive damages in private international law: lessons for the European Union
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Abschlussarbeit Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge ; Antwerp ; Portland
Intersentia
[2016]
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis Klappentext |
| Beschreibung: | xiii, 259 Seiten |
| ISBN: | 9781780684161 1780684169 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV043806334 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20180821 | ||
| 007 | t| | ||
| 008 | 160929s2016 xx m||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9781780684161 |9 978-1-78068-416-1 | ||
| 020 | |a 1780684169 |9 1-78068-416-9 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)964318054 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV043806334 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-M382 |a DE-703 |a DE-739 |a DE-19 |a DE-384 | ||
| 084 | |a PT 319 |0 (DE-625)139857: |2 rvk | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Vanleenhove, Cedric |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1119477980 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Punitive damages in private international law |b lessons for the European Union |c Cedric Vanleenhove |
| 264 | 1 | |a Cambridge ; Antwerp ; Portland |b Intersentia |c [2016] | |
| 300 | |a xiii, 259 Seiten | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 502 | |b Dissertation |c University of Ghent |d 2015 | ||
| 610 | 2 | 7 | |a Europäische Union |0 (DE-588)5098525-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Punitive damages |0 (DE-588)4307307-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Internationales Privatrecht |0 (DE-588)4027446-9 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 655 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)4113937-9 |a Hochschulschrift |2 gnd-content | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Europäische Union |0 (DE-588)5098525-5 |D b |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Internationales Privatrecht |0 (DE-588)4027446-9 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Punitive damages |0 (DE-588)4307307-4 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung UB Bayreuth - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029217668&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung UB Bayreuth - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029217668&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Klappentext |
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029217668 | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1820142556450652160 |
|---|---|
| adam_text |
CONTENTS
Acknowledgements.v
List of Abbreviations. xiii
Introduction. 1
Research setting. 1
Research questions and methodology. 3
Scope. 5
Economic and social relevance. 7
Structure. 7
Chapter 1.
The Concept of Punitive Damages in American Law.9
1.1. Definition. 9
1.2. The history of (U.S.) punitive damages. 13
1.2.1. Early sources. 13
1.2.2. English roots. 14
1.2.3. Reception in American law. 15
1.3. Punitive damages awards in the U.S. 18
1.3.1. Occurrence. 18
1.3.2. Jury discretion.20
1.3.3. Requirements.20
a. Requisite culpability. 21
b. Standard of proof.21
c. Relevant factors used in the determination of the amount . 22
1.3.4. Objectives.23
a. Punishment.24
b. Deterrence/prevention. 25
c. Compensation.25
d. Reward the plaintiff for enforcing the law.27
1.3.5. Frequency and size.27
1.4. Multi-level trend to reduce the amounts of punitive damages in the U.S. . 29
1.4.1. The United States Supreme Court.29
a. Browning-Ferris v. Kelco. 30
b. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Haslip. 31
Intersentia VÜ
Punitive Damages in Private International Law
c. TXO Production Corp. v. Alliance Resources Corp.32
d. Honda Motor Co. v. Oberg.32
e. BMW of North America, Inc. v. Gore.33
f. Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Leatherman Tool Group Inc.35
g. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Campbell . 35
h. Philip Morris USA v. Williams (Philip Morris II).36
i. Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker.39
1.4.2. Lower federal courts and state courts.40
1.4.3. Congress and state legislatures.40
1.5. Conclusion.42
Chapter 2.
Punitive Damages and Service of Process. Serving U.S. Punitive Damages
Claims on Defendants in the EU.45
2.1. Article 1 of the Hague Service Convention: the civil nature of
punitive damages.46
2.1.1. The minority view: denying the civil character .48
2.1.2. The overwhelming majority view: classification as civil claim . 50
2.2. Article 13.1 of Hague Service Convention: an infringement of the
sovereignty or security of the requested state. 53
2.2.1. The first cases: rejection of the Central Authorities’ refusals . 54
2.2.2. Bundesverfassungsgericht 1994: the First Senate.55
a. The injunction of 3 August 1994 prohibiting service.56
b. The decision on the merits: 7 December 1994 . . 57
2.2.3. Bundesverfassungsgericht 2003: the Second Senate in the
Napster case . 59
2.2.4. Oberlandesgericht Celle 1 June 2007: reliance on the Napster
ruling.63
2.2.5. The Second Senate’s opening for a clear abuse of process
from the outset.64
a. Abuse of process as exception to the obligation to
effectuate service. 64
b. “An abuse of process from the outset”: quid? .66
2.3. Conclusion. 67
2.3.1. Deferral to the enforcement stage.67
2.3.2. Futility of a refusal to serve.69
a. The Schlunk doctrine. 69
b. Extension of the claim after service has been performed. 70
2.3.3. Strategy considerations. 71
viii
Inter sentía
Contents
Chapter 3.
Punitive Damages and Applicable Law.73
3.1. Introduction.73
3.2. The concept of public policy.73
3.3. The Rome II Regulation’s approach to foreign punitive damages.75
3.3.1. Scope of the Regulation.76
3.3.2. Lex loci damni as basic principle.77
3.3.3. Public policy exception.77
a. Drafting history.78
b. The effect of recital 32.80
c. Application of the public policy exception in case law.81
3.4. National rules on the application of foreign punitive damages.82
3.5. Conclusion.84
Chapter 4.
The Enforcement of American Punitive Damages in the European Union . 87
4.1. Italy. 89
4.1.1. Conditions for enforcement.89
4.1.2. The Fimez ruling of the Italian Supreme Court.89
a. District Court of Jefferson County.89
b. Venice Court of Appeal.90
c. Italian Supreme Court.93
d. Post-Fimez case law.96
4.2. Germany.97
4.2.1. Conditions for enforcement.97
4.2.2. The Bundesgerichtshofs case of John Doe v. Eckhard
Schmitz.99
a. California Superior Court.99
b. Lower German courts. 100
c. The Bundesgerichtshofss ruling. 100
i. Unenforceability of punitive damages. 100
ii. Proportionality test. 105
iii. The exception for the compensatory part
of the punitive award. 106
4.3. England. 109
4.3.1. Conditions for enforcement . 109
4.3.2. Multiple damages. 110
a. Ratio legis of the Protection of Trading Interests Act
1980. 110
b. Section 5 of PTI A: unenforceability of multiple
damages. Ill
Intersentia ix
Punitive Damages in Private International Law
c. Court of Appeal in Lewis v. Eliades. 112
i. Procedural history. 113
ii. Court of Appeal. 114
d. Section 6 of PTIA: claw-back provision. 115
4.3.3. Punitive damages. 117
4.4. France.120
4.4.1. Conditions for enforcement.120
4.4.2. Case law on the enforcement of punitive damages.123
a. Court of Appeal Paris. 123
b. Fountaine Pajot case of the Cour de cassation.124
i. California Superior Court. 124
ii. Rochefort District Court and Poitiers Court of
Appeal.126
iii. Doctrinal criticism of the Court of Appeal’s
judgment.128
iv. French Supreme Court.130
v. The enforcement of punitive damages after
Fountaine Pajot.136
4.5. Spain.139
4.5.1. Conditions for enforcement. 139
4.5.2. The Supreme Court’s case of Miller Import Corp. v.
Alabastres Alfredo, S.L.139
a. Federal District Court Houston. 139
b. Spanish Supreme Court.140
i. Public policy analysis.140
ii. Proportionality. 141
4.6. Conclusion. 144
Chapter 5.
Traces of Punitive Damages In the EU Member States. 147
5.1. The fluidity of (international) public policy. 148
5.2. Arguments against the enforcement of U.S. punitive damages. 149
5.2.1. Violation of the (strict) compensatory function of private law . 150
5.2.2. Windfall for the plaintiff: unjust enrichment. 152
5.2.3. Violation of the private - public law divide. 153
5.2.4. An intrusion on the penal monopoly of the state. 155
5.2.5. Lack of criminal law safeguards. 156
5.2.6. Inequality between creditors.158
5.3. Punitive elements in European private law. 158
5.3.1. Exemplary damages in England. 161
5.3.2. Multiple damages. 164
x
Intersentia
Contents I
a. Regulation 1768/95 implementing the agricultural
exemption.164
b. French Mining Law 1810. 165
5.3.3. Double license fee for GEMA. 165
5.3.4. Surcharge of benefits in Spanish social security law.166
5.3.5. Penalty clause. 168
5.3.6. V astreinte. 169
5.3.7. Insurance law. 171
5.3.8. Default rate of interest. 174
5.3.9. Civil fines . . 175
5.3.10. Frivolous litigation in Italy. 177
5.3.11. Protection of personality rights.180
a. The creation of a right of personality. 181
b. Caroline von Monaco I: deterrence in private law. 183
c. Spanish Act 1/1982 . 185
d. Gain-based damages - Restitution of unjust enrichment. . 186
5.3.12. Deterrence objectives in combating discrimination
in labour law. 189
a. Von Colson.190
b. Post-Von Colson case law.192
c. Directive 2002/73 . 194
5.3.13. Covert ‘punitive damages’ awarded under the guise of
moral damages.196
5.3.14. Recital 32 of the Rome II Regulation.198
5.3.15. Punitive damages through the backdoor: the principle of
equivalence in EU law. 199
5.3.16. Legislative proposals introducing punitive damages.200
a. Reform drafts of the French Civil Code.201
b. Double damages in EU competition law.203
5.4. Conclusion.205
Chapter 6.
Punitive Damages in Applicable Law and Enforcement of Judgments:
Normative Considerations. An Attempt at Formulating Guidelines.207
6.1. Applicable law.207
6.2. Enforcement of U.S. punitive damages judgments.210
6.2.1. Prohibition of révision au fond. 211
6.2.2. Enforcement is the rule, public policy objections are the
exception.213
6.2.3. The compensatory damages awarded should always be
granted enforcement.214
Intersentia xi
Punitive Damages in Private International Law
6.2.4. The compensatory portion of the punitive damages should
be enforced. 215
6.2.5. U.S. punitive damages going above a 9:1 ratio are,
in principle, suspect.220
6.2.6. A 1:1 ratio might be the appropriate limit.221
6.2.7. The weaker the case’s connection to the requested forum,
the more tolerance should be shown.225
6.2.8. The nature of the interests protected.229
6.2.9. Reducing the punitive award to the tolerable level is allowed. 230
6.3. The intensity of the international public policy exception: ordre
public plein versus ordre public atténué.233
6.4. Conclusion.235
Chapter 7.
Conclusion.237
Bibliography.245
xii
I nter sentía
Although European scholars have called U.S. punitive damages an "(undesired)
peculiarity of American law" and the "Trojan horse of the Americanisation of
continental law", the European Union cannot close its eyes to this important
feature of U.S. law. Despite being under constant scrutiny, punitive damages have
a strong foothold on the other side of the ocean. Moreover, due to increased
globalisation, transnational litigation is arguably on the rise. In cross-border law
suits, it is inevitable that a jurisdiction will encounter legal institutions that are
alien to the substantive law of the forum.
This book examines the private international law treatment of American punitive
damages in the European Union. It poses the crucial question whether U.S.
punitive damages (should) penetrate the borders of the European Union through
the backdoor of private international law. More specifically, three areas of private
international law are analysed: service of process, applicable law and enforcement
of judgments.
In addition to describing the current positions in case law and scholarship, the
book takes a normative perspective and attempts to formulate concrete guiding
principles that can be used when the European legal order faces U.S. punitive
damages. It, therefore, provides an invaluable resource for practitioners, judges
and authorities confronted with this controversial remedy. Furthermore, as a
nation's private international law attitude indicates the country's level of tolerance
towards a foreign concept unknown in its own legal system, the book can form
ah essential building block for discussions amongst legislators surrounding the
introduction of the remedy of punitive damages in substantive law.
Dr. Cedric Vanleenhove is Post-Doctoral Researcher at the Department of
Interdisciplinary Study of Law, Private Law and Business Law (Transnational Law
Center) of Ghent University in Belgium. He holds a Master in Law summacum laude
(2008) as well as a Ph.D. in Law (2015) from the same university. He also received a
Master of Intellectual Property from the University of Leuven (2009) as well as an
LL.M in Commercial Law from Cambridge University (2010). At the latter university
the title of Evan Lewis-Thomas Scholar of Sidney Sussex College was bestowed
upon him. In 2013 he was a Visiting Fellow at the Institute of European and
Comparative Law of Oxford University. The following year he worked as a Visiting
Researcher at Harvard Law School.
ISBN 978-1-78068-416-1 |
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| author | Vanleenhove, Cedric |
| author_GND | (DE-588)1119477980 |
| author_facet | Vanleenhove, Cedric |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Vanleenhove, Cedric |
| author_variant | c v cv |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV043806334 |
| classification_rvk | PT 319 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)964318054 (DE-599)BVBBV043806334 |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| format | Thesis Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nam a2200000 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV043806334</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20180821</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t|</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160929s2016 xx m||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781780684161</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-78068-416-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1780684169</subfield><subfield code="9">1-78068-416-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)964318054</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV043806334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-M382</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-703</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-384</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PT 319</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)139857:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Vanleenhove, Cedric</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1119477980</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Punitive damages in private international law</subfield><subfield code="b">lessons for the European Union</subfield><subfield code="c">Cedric Vanleenhove</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cambridge ; Antwerp ; Portland</subfield><subfield code="b">Intersentia</subfield><subfield code="c">[2016]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xiii, 259 Seiten</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="502" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">Dissertation</subfield><subfield code="c">University of Ghent</subfield><subfield code="d">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Europäische Union</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)5098525-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Punitive damages</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4307307-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Internationales Privatrecht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4027446-9</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4113937-9</subfield><subfield code="a">Hochschulschrift</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd-content</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Europäische Union</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)5098525-5</subfield><subfield code="D">b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Internationales Privatrecht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4027446-9</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Punitive damages</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4307307-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung UB Bayreuth - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029217668&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung UB Bayreuth - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029217668&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Klappentext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029217668</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| genre | (DE-588)4113937-9 Hochschulschrift gnd-content |
| genre_facet | Hochschulschrift |
| id | DE-604.BV043806334 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2025-01-02T13:06:48Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9781780684161 1780684169 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029217668 |
| oclc_num | 964318054 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-M382 DE-703 DE-739 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-384 |
| owner_facet | DE-M382 DE-703 DE-739 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-384 |
| physical | xiii, 259 Seiten |
| publishDate | 2016 |
| publishDateSearch | 2016 |
| publishDateSort | 2016 |
| publisher | Intersentia |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Vanleenhove, Cedric Verfasser (DE-588)1119477980 aut Punitive damages in private international law lessons for the European Union Cedric Vanleenhove Cambridge ; Antwerp ; Portland Intersentia [2016] xiii, 259 Seiten txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Dissertation University of Ghent 2015 Europäische Union (DE-588)5098525-5 gnd rswk-swf Punitive damages (DE-588)4307307-4 gnd rswk-swf Internationales Privatrecht (DE-588)4027446-9 gnd rswk-swf (DE-588)4113937-9 Hochschulschrift gnd-content Europäische Union (DE-588)5098525-5 b Internationales Privatrecht (DE-588)4027446-9 s Punitive damages (DE-588)4307307-4 s DE-604 Digitalisierung UB Bayreuth - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029217668&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis Digitalisierung UB Bayreuth - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029217668&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Klappentext |
| spellingShingle | Vanleenhove, Cedric Punitive damages in private international law lessons for the European Union Europäische Union (DE-588)5098525-5 gnd Punitive damages (DE-588)4307307-4 gnd Internationales Privatrecht (DE-588)4027446-9 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)5098525-5 (DE-588)4307307-4 (DE-588)4027446-9 (DE-588)4113937-9 |
| title | Punitive damages in private international law lessons for the European Union |
| title_auth | Punitive damages in private international law lessons for the European Union |
| title_exact_search | Punitive damages in private international law lessons for the European Union |
| title_full | Punitive damages in private international law lessons for the European Union Cedric Vanleenhove |
| title_fullStr | Punitive damages in private international law lessons for the European Union Cedric Vanleenhove |
| title_full_unstemmed | Punitive damages in private international law lessons for the European Union Cedric Vanleenhove |
| title_short | Punitive damages in private international law |
| title_sort | punitive damages in private international law lessons for the european union |
| title_sub | lessons for the European Union |
| topic | Europäische Union (DE-588)5098525-5 gnd Punitive damages (DE-588)4307307-4 gnd Internationales Privatrecht (DE-588)4027446-9 gnd |
| topic_facet | Europäische Union Punitive damages Internationales Privatrecht Hochschulschrift |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029217668&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029217668&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT vanleenhovecedric punitivedamagesinprivateinternationallawlessonsfortheeuropeanunion |