Most Deserving of Death?: an Analysis of the Supreme Court's Death Penalty Jurisprudence
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Farnham
Ashgate Publishing Ltd
2012
|
| Schriftenreihe: | Law, justice, and power
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | FAW01 FAW02 |
| Beschreibung: | Cover; Contents; List of Tables; Acknowledgments; Introduction; 1 History of Capital Punishment in the United States; 2 The Problem of Ineffective Representation; 3 Race and the Death Penalty; 4 Innocence; 5 Mental Illness; 6 Death Penalty Procedures and Appeals; 7 International Law and the Death Penalty; 8 Methods of Execution; 9 Judges and Capital Punishment; Conclusion; Index This book demonstrates that it is the inconsistent and often incoherent jurisprudence of the United States Supreme Court which accounts for a system so lacking in public confidence. Using case studies, Kenneth Williams examines issues such as jury selection, ineffective assistance of counsel, the role of race and claims of innocence which affect the Court's decisions. Discussing international treaties and their lack of impact on capital punishment in America, this book makes an important contribution to legal scholarship. It also provides a unique understanding of the dynamics of an alarmingly Includes bibliographical references and index |
| Beschreibung: | 227 pages |
| ISBN: | 9780754697541 0754697541 1283429292 9781283429290 9780754678854 0754678857 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV043786632 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 160920s2012 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9780754697541 |9 978-0-7546-9754-1 | ||
| 020 | |a 0754697541 |9 0-7546-9754-1 | ||
| 020 | |a 1283429292 |9 1-283-42929-2 | ||
| 020 | |a 9781283429290 |9 978-1-283-42929-0 | ||
| 020 | |a 9780754678854 |9 978-0-7546-7885-4 | ||
| 020 | |a 0754678857 |9 0-7546-7885-7 | ||
| 035 | |a (ZDB-4-EBA)ocn773565452 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)773565452 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV043786632 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-1046 |a DE-1047 | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 345.730773 | |
| 100 | 1 | |a Williams, Kenneth |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Most Deserving of Death? |b an Analysis of the Supreme Court's Death Penalty Jurisprudence |
| 264 | 1 | |a Farnham |b Ashgate Publishing Ltd |c 2012 | |
| 300 | |a 227 pages | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a Law, justice, and power | |
| 500 | |a Cover; Contents; List of Tables; Acknowledgments; Introduction; 1 History of Capital Punishment in the United States; 2 The Problem of Ineffective Representation; 3 Race and the Death Penalty; 4 Innocence; 5 Mental Illness; 6 Death Penalty Procedures and Appeals; 7 International Law and the Death Penalty; 8 Methods of Execution; 9 Judges and Capital Punishment; Conclusion; Index | ||
| 500 | |a This book demonstrates that it is the inconsistent and often incoherent jurisprudence of the United States Supreme Court which accounts for a system so lacking in public confidence. Using case studies, Kenneth Williams examines issues such as jury selection, ineffective assistance of counsel, the role of race and claims of innocence which affect the Court's decisions. Discussing international treaties and their lack of impact on capital punishment in America, this book makes an important contribution to legal scholarship. It also provides a unique understanding of the dynamics of an alarmingly | ||
| 500 | |a Includes bibliographical references and index | ||
| 610 | 1 | 7 | |a United States / Supreme Court |2 fast |
| 610 | 2 | 4 | |a United States |b Supreme Court |v Cases |
| 610 | 2 | 7 | |a USA |b Supreme Court |0 (DE-588)35650-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 648 | 7 | |a Geschichte |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Law | |
| 650 | 7 | |a LAW / Criminal Law / General |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Capital punishment |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Discrimination in capital punishment |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Discrimination in criminal justice administration |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Due process of law |2 fast | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Recht | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Capital punishment |z United States | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Due process of law |z United States | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Discrimination in capital punishment |z United States | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Discrimination in criminal justice administration |z United States | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Todesstrafe |0 (DE-588)4060306-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 4 | |a USA | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a USA |b Supreme Court |0 (DE-588)35650-5 |D b |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Todesstrafe |0 (DE-588)4060306-4 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Geschichte |A z |
| 689 | 0 | |8 1\p |5 DE-604 | |
| 912 | |a ZDB-4-EBA | ||
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029197691 | ||
| 883 | 1 | |8 1\p |a cgwrk |d 20201028 |q DE-101 |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk | |
| 966 | e | |u http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=430364 |l FAW01 |p ZDB-4-EBA |q FAW_PDA_EBA |x Aggregator |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=430364 |l FAW02 |p ZDB-4-EBA |q FAW_PDA_EBA |x Aggregator |3 Volltext | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804176622720385024 |
|---|---|
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Williams, Kenneth |
| author_facet | Williams, Kenneth |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Williams, Kenneth |
| author_variant | k w kw |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV043786632 |
| collection | ZDB-4-EBA |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-4-EBA)ocn773565452 (OCoLC)773565452 (DE-599)BVBBV043786632 |
| dewey-full | 345.730773 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 345 - Criminal law |
| dewey-raw | 345.730773 |
| dewey-search | 345.730773 |
| dewey-sort | 3345.730773 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| era | Geschichte gnd |
| era_facet | Geschichte |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03601nmm a2200685zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV043786632</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160920s2012 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780754697541</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-7546-9754-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">0754697541</subfield><subfield code="9">0-7546-9754-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1283429292</subfield><subfield code="9">1-283-42929-2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781283429290</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-283-42929-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780754678854</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-7546-7885-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">0754678857</subfield><subfield code="9">0-7546-7885-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-4-EBA)ocn773565452</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)773565452</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV043786632</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-1046</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1047</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">345.730773</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Williams, Kenneth</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Most Deserving of Death?</subfield><subfield code="b">an Analysis of the Supreme Court's Death Penalty Jurisprudence</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Farnham</subfield><subfield code="b">Ashgate Publishing Ltd</subfield><subfield code="c">2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">227 pages</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Law, justice, and power</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cover; Contents; List of Tables; Acknowledgments; Introduction; 1 History of Capital Punishment in the United States; 2 The Problem of Ineffective Representation; 3 Race and the Death Penalty; 4 Innocence; 5 Mental Illness; 6 Death Penalty Procedures and Appeals; 7 International Law and the Death Penalty; 8 Methods of Execution; 9 Judges and Capital Punishment; Conclusion; Index</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This book demonstrates that it is the inconsistent and often incoherent jurisprudence of the United States Supreme Court which accounts for a system so lacking in public confidence. Using case studies, Kenneth Williams examines issues such as jury selection, ineffective assistance of counsel, the role of race and claims of innocence which affect the Court's decisions. Discussing international treaties and their lack of impact on capital punishment in America, this book makes an important contribution to legal scholarship. It also provides a unique understanding of the dynamics of an alarmingly</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references and index</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="1" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">United States / Supreme Court</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">United States</subfield><subfield code="b">Supreme Court</subfield><subfield code="v">Cases</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="b">Supreme Court</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)35650-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="648" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Geschichte</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW / Criminal Law / General</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Capital punishment</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Discrimination in capital punishment</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Discrimination in criminal justice administration</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Due process of law</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Recht</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Capital punishment</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Due process of law</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Discrimination in capital punishment</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Discrimination in criminal justice administration</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Todesstrafe</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4060306-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="b">Supreme Court</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)35650-5</subfield><subfield code="D">b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Todesstrafe</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4060306-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Geschichte</subfield><subfield code="A">z</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029197691</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="883" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="a">cgwrk</subfield><subfield code="d">20201028</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-101</subfield><subfield code="u">https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=430364</subfield><subfield code="l">FAW01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield><subfield code="q">FAW_PDA_EBA</subfield><subfield code="x">Aggregator</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=430364</subfield><subfield code="l">FAW02</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield><subfield code="q">FAW_PDA_EBA</subfield><subfield code="x">Aggregator</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | USA |
| geographic_facet | USA |
| id | DE-604.BV043786632 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T07:35:07Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9780754697541 0754697541 1283429292 9781283429290 9780754678854 0754678857 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029197691 |
| oclc_num | 773565452 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-1046 DE-1047 |
| owner_facet | DE-1046 DE-1047 |
| physical | 227 pages |
| psigel | ZDB-4-EBA ZDB-4-EBA FAW_PDA_EBA |
| publishDate | 2012 |
| publishDateSearch | 2012 |
| publishDateSort | 2012 |
| publisher | Ashgate Publishing Ltd |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | Law, justice, and power |
| spelling | Williams, Kenneth Verfasser aut Most Deserving of Death? an Analysis of the Supreme Court's Death Penalty Jurisprudence Farnham Ashgate Publishing Ltd 2012 227 pages txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Law, justice, and power Cover; Contents; List of Tables; Acknowledgments; Introduction; 1 History of Capital Punishment in the United States; 2 The Problem of Ineffective Representation; 3 Race and the Death Penalty; 4 Innocence; 5 Mental Illness; 6 Death Penalty Procedures and Appeals; 7 International Law and the Death Penalty; 8 Methods of Execution; 9 Judges and Capital Punishment; Conclusion; Index This book demonstrates that it is the inconsistent and often incoherent jurisprudence of the United States Supreme Court which accounts for a system so lacking in public confidence. Using case studies, Kenneth Williams examines issues such as jury selection, ineffective assistance of counsel, the role of race and claims of innocence which affect the Court's decisions. Discussing international treaties and their lack of impact on capital punishment in America, this book makes an important contribution to legal scholarship. It also provides a unique understanding of the dynamics of an alarmingly Includes bibliographical references and index United States / Supreme Court fast United States Supreme Court Cases USA Supreme Court (DE-588)35650-5 gnd rswk-swf Geschichte gnd rswk-swf Law LAW / Criminal Law / General bisacsh Capital punishment fast Discrimination in capital punishment fast Discrimination in criminal justice administration fast Due process of law fast Recht Capital punishment United States Due process of law United States Discrimination in capital punishment United States Discrimination in criminal justice administration United States Todesstrafe (DE-588)4060306-4 gnd rswk-swf USA USA Supreme Court (DE-588)35650-5 b Todesstrafe (DE-588)4060306-4 s Geschichte z 1\p DE-604 1\p cgwrk 20201028 DE-101 https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk |
| spellingShingle | Williams, Kenneth Most Deserving of Death? an Analysis of the Supreme Court's Death Penalty Jurisprudence United States / Supreme Court fast United States Supreme Court Cases USA Supreme Court (DE-588)35650-5 gnd Law LAW / Criminal Law / General bisacsh Capital punishment fast Discrimination in capital punishment fast Discrimination in criminal justice administration fast Due process of law fast Recht Capital punishment United States Due process of law United States Discrimination in capital punishment United States Discrimination in criminal justice administration United States Todesstrafe (DE-588)4060306-4 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)35650-5 (DE-588)4060306-4 |
| title | Most Deserving of Death? an Analysis of the Supreme Court's Death Penalty Jurisprudence |
| title_auth | Most Deserving of Death? an Analysis of the Supreme Court's Death Penalty Jurisprudence |
| title_exact_search | Most Deserving of Death? an Analysis of the Supreme Court's Death Penalty Jurisprudence |
| title_full | Most Deserving of Death? an Analysis of the Supreme Court's Death Penalty Jurisprudence |
| title_fullStr | Most Deserving of Death? an Analysis of the Supreme Court's Death Penalty Jurisprudence |
| title_full_unstemmed | Most Deserving of Death? an Analysis of the Supreme Court's Death Penalty Jurisprudence |
| title_short | Most Deserving of Death? |
| title_sort | most deserving of death an analysis of the supreme court s death penalty jurisprudence |
| title_sub | an Analysis of the Supreme Court's Death Penalty Jurisprudence |
| topic | United States / Supreme Court fast United States Supreme Court Cases USA Supreme Court (DE-588)35650-5 gnd Law LAW / Criminal Law / General bisacsh Capital punishment fast Discrimination in capital punishment fast Discrimination in criminal justice administration fast Due process of law fast Recht Capital punishment United States Due process of law United States Discrimination in capital punishment United States Discrimination in criminal justice administration United States Todesstrafe (DE-588)4060306-4 gnd |
| topic_facet | United States / Supreme Court United States Supreme Court Cases USA Supreme Court Law LAW / Criminal Law / General Capital punishment Discrimination in capital punishment Discrimination in criminal justice administration Due process of law Recht Capital punishment United States Due process of law United States Discrimination in capital punishment United States Discrimination in criminal justice administration United States Todesstrafe USA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT williamskenneth mostdeservingofdeathananalysisofthesupremecourtsdeathpenaltyjurisprudence |