Verfügbarkeit: The death penalty

The death penalty: constitutional issues, commentaries, and case briefs

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser:	Vollum, Scott 1970- (VerfasserIn), Del Carmen, Rolando V. 1930- (VerfasserIn), Frantzen, Durant (VerfasserIn), San Miguel, Claudia (VerfasserIn), Cheeseman, Kelly (VerfasserIn)
Format:	Buch
Sprache:	English
Veröffentlicht:	London ; New York Routledge [2015]
Ausgabe:	Third edition
Online-Zugang:	Inhaltsverzeichnis
Beschreibung:	XXXV, 355 Seiten
ISBN:	9781455776337

Internformat

MARC


LEADER	00000nam a2200000 c 4500
001	BV043727936
003	DE-604
005	20161216
007	t
008	160823s2015 \|\|\|\| 00\|\|\| eng d
020			\|a 9781455776337 \|9 978-1-4557-7633-7
035			\|a (OCoLC)968135041
035			\|a (DE-599)BVBBV043727936
040			\|a DE-604 \|b ger \|e rda
041	0		\|a eng
049			\|a DE-739
084			\|a PH 6405 \|0 (DE-625)136436:406 \|2 rvk
100	1		\|a Vollum, Scott \|d 1970- \|e Verfasser \|0 (DE-588)1102565962 \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a The death penalty \|b constitutional issues, commentaries, and case briefs \|c Scott Vollum, Rolando V. del Carmen, Durant Frantzen, Claudia San Miguel, Kelly Cheeseman
250			\|a Third edition
264		1	\|a London ; New York \|b Routledge \|c [2015]
300			\|a XXXV, 355 Seiten
336			\|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|b n \|2 rdamedia
338			\|b nc \|2 rdacarrier
700	1		\|a Del Carmen, Rolando V. \|d 1930- \|e Verfasser \|0 (DE-588)1055809805 \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Frantzen, Durant \|e Verfasser \|0 (DE-588)1102566861 \|4 aut
700	1		\|a San Miguel, Claudia \|e Verfasser \|0 (DE-588)1102568325 \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Cheeseman, Kelly \|e Verfasser \|4 aut
856	4	2	\|m Digitalisierung UB Passau - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment \|q application/pdf \|u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029139856&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA \|3 Inhaltsverzeichnis
999			\|a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029139856

Datensatz im Suchindex

_version_	1804176524797018112
adam_text	Contents Preface to the Third Edition.............................................................xvii Preface to the Second Edition.............................................................xix Preface and Introduction to the First Edition..............................................xxi About the Authors.......................................................................xxiii Acknowledgments...........................................................................xxv Online Resources........................................................................xxvii Table of Cases...........................................................................xxix Top Ten Most Significant Death Penalty Cases.............................................xxxv CHAPTER 1 The Death Penalty: Past and Present..............................................1 I. Introduction................................................................1 II. A Retrospective Analysis of the Death Penalty.............................2 A. The Colonial Period......................................................2 B. The Age of Enlightenment and the Early Movement to Abolish the Death Penalty.................................................3 1. From Europe to the Colonies: The Impact of Enlightenment..............3 2. Changes in the Death Penalty from 1790-1950...........................4 III. Early Supreme Court Decisions on the Death Penalty.........................6 A. Wilkerson v. Utah: Death by Firing Squad.................................7 B. In re Kemmler: Death by Electrocution....................................8 C. Louisiana ex rel. Francis v. Resweber: The Constitutionality of Being Executed Twice..................................................10 D. Additional Changes in the Death Penalty Prior to 1972...................12 IV. The Current Status of the Death Penalty in the United States..............13 A. Retentionist versus Abolitionist States.................................13 B. A Decline in Death Sentences and Executions.............................14 C. Recent Supreme Court and Circuit Court Rulings..........................16 V. In Summary, What Do These Cases Say?......................................20 VI. Conclusion................................................................21 Cases Briefed in Chapter 1..................................................23 Case Briefs.................................................................23 Wilkerson v. Utah, 99 U.S. 130 (1878)....................................23 In re Kemmler, 136 U.S. 436 (1890)..................................... 24 Louisiana ex rel. Francis v. Resweber, 329 U.S. 459 (1947)...............26 Key Terms...................................................................26 Critical Thinking Questions.................................................27 Internet Resources..........................................................27 vii viii Contents CHAPTER 2 The Foundation Cases: Furman v. Georgia and Gregg v. Georgia.........29 I. Introduction...............................................................29 II. Furman v. Georgia (1972): The Death Penalty Is Unconstitutional............30 A. The Background..........................................................30 B. The Facts...............................................................30 C. The Majority Opinions...................................................30 D. The Dissenting Opinions.................................................32 III. Gregg v. Georgia (1976): The Death Penalty Is Constitutional in Some Cases.................................................................33 A. The Background..........................................................33 B. The Facts...............................................................34 C. The Majority Opinions...................................................34 D. The Dissenting Opinions.................................................36 IV. In Summary, What Do These Cases Say?......................................37 V. Conclusion.............................................................. 37 Cases Briefed in Chapter 2.................................................38 Case Briefs................................................................38 Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238 (1972)..................................38 Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153 (1976)....................................39 Key Terms..................................................................41 Critical Thinking Questions................................................41 Internet Resources.........................................................42 CHAPTER 3 Race and the Death Penalty.................................................43 I. Introduction...............................................................43 II. Bias in Death Penalty Cases and Jury Selection in Capital Proceedings......44 III. Legislative Responses to Discrimination in Capital Proceedings.......45 A. Federal Response: The Proposed Racial Justice Act and Its Failure...45 B. State Responses: Racial Justice Acts and Examination of Statistical Disparities..............................................................46 IV. The Legal Community: An Assessment of Prosecutors and Defense Attorneys.... 51 A. District Attorneys......................................................51 B. Defense Attorneys.......................................................55 V. The Jury: A Biased Bunch or Victims of Misinformation?....................57 A. Jury Selection..........................................................58 B. Peremptory Challenges...................................................60 VI. In Summary, What Do These Cases Say?......................................63 VII. Conclusion.................................................................64 Cases Briefed in Chapter 3.................................................65 Case Briefs................................................................65 Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986)...................................65 McCleskey v. Kemp, 481 U.S. 279 (1987)...................................67 Contents ix Turner v. Murray, 476 U.S. 28 (1986)....................................68 Miller-El v. Dretke, 545 US. 231 (2005).................................69 Snyder v. Louisiana, 552 U.S. 472 (2008)................................71 Key Terms..................................................................72 Critical Thinking Questions............................................... 73 Internet Resources........................................................ 73 CHAPTER 4 The Mentally Impaired and the Death Penalty................................... 75 I. Introduction...............................................................75 II. Supreme Court Cases: Past and Present.....................................76 A. A Starting Point: Penry v. Lynaugh (1989)..............................76 B. Executing the Mentally Retarded Is Unconstitutional: Atkins v. Virginia (2002)...............................................76 C. Cases After Atkins.....................................................77 III. Issues with Mental Impairment in Capital Cases...........................79 A. Definition of Mental Retardation/Developmental Disability..............79 B. The Fear of Faking......................................... ...........86 C. Mental Retardation versus Mental Illness................................87 IV. Insanity and the Death Penalty.............................................88 A. Insanity: Different From Other Mental Impairments.......................88 B. Reasons for Not Executing the Insane....................................89 1. Failure to Achieve Penological Goals.................................89 a. Deterrence........................................................89 b. Retribution.......................................................89 2. Theological...........................................................90 3. Humanity..............................................................90 C. Mental Competence and the Death Penalty................................90 V. In Summary, What Do These Cases Say?.......................................92 VI. Conclusion.................................................................93 Cases Briefed in Chapter 4................................................ 94 Case Briefs........................................................... 95 Ford v. Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986).................................95 Penry v. Lynaugh, 492 U.S. 302 (1989).................................. 96 Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002)................................ 97 Singleton v. Norris, 319 F.3d 1018 (8TH CIR. 2003)......................99 Tennard v. Dretke, 542 U.S. 274 (2004)................................. 100 Panetti v. Quarterman, 551 U.S. 930 (2007).............................. 101 Bobby v. Bies, 556 U.S. 825 (2009)..................................... 102 Ryan v. Gonzales/Tibbals v. Carter, 568 U.S.__(2013)....................103 Key Teims.............................................................. 104 Critical Thinking Questions............................................ 105 Internet Resources.........................................................105 X Contents CHAPTER 5 The Death Penalty for Juveniles....................................................107 I. Introduction.................................................................107 II. Thompson v. Oklahoma: Executing Juveniles Age 15 and Younger Is Unconstitutional.............................................................108 A. Facts....................................................................108 B. The Court’s Holding......................................................109 C. Reasoning................................................................109 III. Stanford v. Kentucky: Executing Juveniles Ages 16 to 17 Is Constitutional.110 A. Facts....................................................................110 B. The Court’s Holding......................................................110 C. Reasoning................................................................Ill IV. Atkins v. Virginia: A Case Involving the Mentally Retarded, But a Prelude to the Abolition of the Juvenile Death Penalty...............................Ill A. The Issue and Holding....................................................111 B. Significance of Atkins for the Juvenile Death Penalty: The Missouri Supreme Court’s Decision in Simmons v. Roper.......................................112 V. Roper v. Simmons: The Supreme Court Declares the Execution of Juveniles Unconstitutional.............................................................113 A. Facts....................................................................113 B. The Holding..............................................................114 C. Majority Opinion.........................................................114 D. Dissenting Opinions......................................................116 VI. Evolving Standards and Future Issues Concerning the Sentencing of Juveniles.. 118 VII. In Summary, What Do These Cases Say?........................................120 VIII. Conclusion..................................................................122 Cases Briefed in Chapter 5...................................................123 Case Briefs..................................................................123 Thompson v. Oklahoma, 487 U.S. 815 (1988)................................. 123 Stanford v. Kentucky, 492 U.S. 361 (1989)................................. 124 Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 (2005)..................................... 125 Key Terms....................................................................127 Critical Thinking Questions..................................................127 internet Resources...........................................................128 CHAPTER 6 Juries, Jurors, and the Death Penalty...........................................129 I. Introduction.................................................................129 II. The Ultimate Responsibility: Bifurcated Trials and the Role of Capital Juries... 130 A. Jury Override: Judges Trumping Juries....................................131 B. Ring v. Arizona (2002): The End of Judicial Sentencing in Capital Cases? .,..132 III. Jury Instructions: Guided Discretion in Capital Cases....................134 A. Guilt Phase: Lesser Included Offenses....................................135 B. Penalty Phase: Future Dangerousness and Parole Eligibility...............136 Contents xi IV. Jury Selection in Capital Cases: Death Qualification.....................138 V. In Summary, What Do These Cases Say?......................................140 VI. Conclusion.................................................................141 Cases Briefed in Chapter 6.................................................142 Case Briefs.................................................................143 Witherspoon v. Illinois, 391 U.S. 510 (1968)............................ 143 Beck v. Alabama, 447 U.S. 625 (1980).................................... 144 Lockhart v. McCree, 476 U.S. 162 (1986)................................. 145 Mills v, Maryland, 486 U.S. 367 (1988).................................. 146 Morgan v. Illinois, 504 U.S. 719 (1992)..................................147 Simmons v. South Carolina, 512 U.S. 154 (1994).......................... 148 Weeks v. Angelone, 528 U.S. 225 (2000)...................................150 Ring v. Arizona, 536 U.S. 584 (2002).................................... 151 Uttecht v. Brown, 551 U.S. 1 (2007)......................................152 Key Terms...................................................................153 Critical Thinking Questions.................................................154 Internet Resources..........................................................154 CHAPTER 7 The Right to Effective Assistance of Counsel and the Death Penalty...............155 I. Introduction...............................................................155 II. Strickland: A Two-Part Test for Deciding Ineffective Assistance Claims.....156 III. Ineffective Assistance of Counsel and the AEDPA...........................157 IV. Representation for Indigent Capital Defendants............................161 V. Defense Counsel’s Duty to Investigate and Defend..........................162 A. ABA Guidelines: A New Model for Conducting Mitigation Investigations...........................................................164 B. Recent Cases Challenging the Adequacy of Mitigation Defense Work.......165 VI. Attorney-Client Negotiations...............................................169 VII. In Summary, What Do These Cases Say?.......................................174 VIII. Conclusion................................................................175 Cases Briefed in Chapter 7..................................................176 Case Briefs.................................................................178 Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 688 (1984)........................... 178 Lockhart v. Fretwell, 506 U.S. 364 (1993)............................... 179 Mickens v. Taylor, 535 U.S. 162 (2002).................................. 180 Bell v. Cone, 535 U.S. 685 (2002)....................................... 181 Wiggins v. Smith, 539 U.S. 510 (2003)................................... 182 Florida v. Nixon, 543 U.S. 175 (2004)....................................183 Rompilla v. Beard, 545 U.S. 374 (2005).................................. 184 Schriro v. Landrigan, 550 U.S. 465 (2007)............................... 186 Wood v. Allen, 558 U.S. 290 (2010)...................................... 187 Maples v. Thomas, 565 U.S.______(2012)..................................189 xii Contents Key Terms.................................................................190 Critical Thinking Questions...............................................191 Internet Resources........................................................191 CHAPTER 8 Due Process and the Death Penalty..........................................193 I. Introduction...............................................................193 II. Guided Discretion, Juries, and Due Process................................194 A. Due Process Requires Consideration of Mitigating Evidence..............194 B. Due Process Requires Opportunity to Rebut State’s Evidence.............195 C. Future Dangerousness and the Right to Due Process......................196 D. Due Process and Third-Party Guilt......................................197 E. Due Process and the Issue of Shackling.................................198 F. Due Process and the Importance of the Jury Verdict.....................199 III. Admissibility of Psychiatric Examinations................................200 IV. The Brady Rule and the Right to Due Process..............................202 A. The Disclosure Duty....................................................203 B. Recent Brady Challenges in Death Penalty Cases........................203 V. In Summary, What Do These Cases Say?.....................................206 VI. Conclusion...............................................................207 Cases Briefed in Chapter 8................................................207 Case Briefs...............................................................208 Gardner v. Florida, 430 U.S. 349 (1977)................................208 Estelle v. Smith, 451 U.S. 454 (1981)...................................209 Eddings v. Oklahoma, 455 U.S. 104 (1982)...............................210 Gray v. Netherland, 518 U.S. 152 (1996)................................211 Sattazahn v. Pennsylvania, 537 U.S. 101 (2003).........................212 Deck v. Missouri, 544 U.S. 622 (2005)..................................213 Holmes v. South Carolina, 547 U.S. 319 (2006)...........................215 Cone v. Bell, 556 U.S. 449 (2009).......................................216 Connick v. Thompson, 563 U.S.______(2011)..............................217 Key Terms.................................................................218 Critical Thinking Questions...............................................219 Internet Resources........................................................219 CHAPTER 9 Aggravating and Mitigating Factors in Death Penalty Cases..................221 I. Introduction...............................................................221 II. Gregg v. Georgia and the Emerging Importance of Aggravating and Mitigating Factors........................................................222 III. Aggravating Factors......................................................229 A. General Procedural Requirements........................................229 B. Vagueness and Guided (or Unguided) Discretion..........................229 Contents xiii C. The Special Case of Victim Impact Evidence............................231 D. The Special Case of Future Dangerousness..............................232 IV. Mitigating Factors.......................................................233 A. General Procedural Requirements.......................................234 B. Evidence Allowed......................................................235 C. Jury Instructions.....................................................236 V. In Summary, What Do These Cases Say?.....................................237 VI. Conclusion...............................................................238 Cases Briefed in Chapter 9...............................................239 Case Briefs..............................................................240 Woodson v. North Carolina, 428 U.S. 280 (1976)........................240 Presnell v. Georgia, 439 U.S. 14 (1978)................................241 Lockett v. Ohio, 438 U.S. 586 (1978)...................................242 Barefoot v. Estelle, 463 U.S. 880 (1983)..............................243 Lewis v. Jeffers, 497 U.S. 764 (1990).................................244 McKoy v. North Carolina, 494 U.S. 433 (1990)..........................245 Payne v. Tennessee, 501 U.S. 808 (1991)...............................246 Kansas v. Marsh, 548 U.S. 163 (2006)................................. 248 Brewer v. Quarterman, 550 U.S. 286 (2007)..............................249 Key Terms.................................................................250 Critical Thinking Questions...............................................250 Internet Resources........................................................251 CHAPTER 10 Appeals, Habeas Corpus, and the Death Penalty............................253 I. Introduction..............................................................253 II. The Appellate Process....................................................254 III. The Great Writ..........................................................255 A. History...............................................................255 B. The Battle over Successive Petitions and the Road to the AEDPA.......257 1. The Good Faith/Bad Faith Rule.......................................257 2. New-Claim Successive Petitions Rule.................................258 3. The Impact of Gregg on Successive Petitions........................258 C. The AEDPA.............................................................260 IV. Current Consequences of the AEDPA.......................................262 A. Current Debate over Successive Petitions..............................262 B. Statute of Limitations and Actual Innocence...........................265 1. Statute of Limitations..............................................265 2. Actual Innocence....................................................267 V. Habeas Corpus and 42 U.S.C. §1983.......................................270 VI. In Summary, What Do These Cases Say?.....................................273 xiv Contents VII. Conclusion.................................................................275 Cases Briefed in Chapter 10................................................276 Case Briefs................................................................277 Rose v. Lundy, 455 U.S. 509 (1982)......................................277 McCleskey v. Zant, 499 U.S. 467 (1991)..................................279 Sawyer v. Whitley, 505 U.S. 333 (1992)..................................280 Herrera v. Collins, 506 U.S. 390 (1993)..................................281 Stewart v. Martinez-Villareal, 523 U.S. 637 (1998)......................283 Felker v. Turpin, 518 U.S. 651 (1996)...................................284 Nelson v. Campbell, 541 U.S. 637 (2004)..................................285 House v. Bell, 547 U.S. 518 (2006).......................................287 Lawrence v. Florida, 549 U.S. 327 (2007).................................288 Skinner v. Switzer, 562 U.S.___(2011)....................................289 Key Terms..................................................................290 Critical Thinking Questions................................................290 Internet Resources.........................................................291 CHAPTER 11 Evolving Standards of Decency and the Eighth Amendment’s Ban on Cruel and Unusual Punishment...............................................293 I. Introduction...............................................................293 II. Methods of Execution.......................................................294 A. Modern Execution Methods (Lethal Injection)............................295 B. Botched and Failed Executions..........................................299 III. Proportionality of Punishment.............................................300 A. Types of Crimes........................................................301 B. Degree of Involvement in Killing.......................................302 C. Proportionality Review.................................................303 IV. The Role of Public Opinion................................................303 V. International Perspectives................................................306 VI. States Repealing Death Penalty Statutes...................................308 VII. In Summary, What Do These Cases Say?.......................................310 VIII. Conclusion................................................................310 Cases Briefed in Chapter 11................................................311 Case Briefs................................................................312 Pulley v. Harris, 465 U.S. 37 (1984).....................................312 Tison v. Arizona, 481 U.S. 137 (1987)....................................313 Baze v. Rees, 553 U.S. 35 (2008).........................................314 Kennedy v. Louisiana, 554 U.S. 407 (2008)................................316 Key Terms..................................................................318 Critical Thinking Questions................................................318 Internet Resources.........................................................319 Contents xv CHAPTER 12 Other Issues, Trends, and the Future of the Death Penalty......................321 I. Introduction...............................................................321 II. Penological Justifications for Punishment and the Death Penalty..........323 A. Retribution and the Death Penalty.......................................324 B. Deterrence and the Death Penalty........................................325 C. Incapacitation and the Death Penalty....................................327 D. Justifying the Death Penalty: The Supreme Court.........................328 III. Flaws in the Administration of the Death Penalty..........................330 IV. Current Death Penalty Trends in the United States.........................336 V. The Future of the Death Penalty in the United States.......................339 Key Terms...................................................................340 Critical Thinking Questions.................................................340 Internet Resources..........................................................341 Index......................................................................................343
any_adam_object	1
author	Vollum, Scott 1970- Del Carmen, Rolando V. 1930- Frantzen, Durant San Miguel, Claudia Cheeseman, Kelly
author_GND	(DE-588)1102565962 (DE-588)1055809805 (DE-588)1102566861 (DE-588)1102568325
author_facet	Vollum, Scott 1970- Del Carmen, Rolando V. 1930- Frantzen, Durant San Miguel, Claudia Cheeseman, Kelly
author_role	aut aut aut aut aut
author_sort	Vollum, Scott 1970-
author_variant	s v sv c r v d crv crvd d f df m c s mc mcs k c kc
building	Verbundindex
bvnumber	BV043727936
classification_rvk	PH 6405
ctrlnum	(OCoLC)968135041 (DE-599)BVBBV043727936
discipline	Rechtswissenschaft
edition	Third edition
format	Book
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01479nam a2200337 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV043727936</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20161216 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160823s2015 \|\|\|\| 00\|\|\| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781455776337</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-4557-7633-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)968135041</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV043727936</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PH 6405</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)136436:406</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Vollum, Scott</subfield><subfield code="d">1970-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1102565962</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The death penalty</subfield><subfield code="b">constitutional issues, commentaries, and case briefs</subfield><subfield code="c">Scott Vollum, Rolando V. del Carmen, Durant Frantzen, Claudia San Miguel, Kelly Cheeseman</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Third edition</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">London ; New York</subfield><subfield code="b">Routledge</subfield><subfield code="c">[2015]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">XXXV, 355 Seiten</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Del Carmen, Rolando V.</subfield><subfield code="d">1930-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1055809805</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Frantzen, Durant</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1102566861</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">San Miguel, Claudia</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1102568325</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cheeseman, Kelly</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung UB Passau - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029139856&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029139856</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
id	DE-604.BV043727936
illustrated	Not Illustrated
indexdate	2024-07-10T07:33:33Z
institution	BVB
isbn	9781455776337
language	English
oai_aleph_id	oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029139856
oclc_num	968135041
open_access_boolean
owner	DE-739
owner_facet	DE-739
physical	XXXV, 355 Seiten
publishDate	2015
publishDateSearch	2015
publishDateSort	2015
publisher	Routledge
record_format	marc
spelling	Vollum, Scott 1970- Verfasser (DE-588)1102565962 aut The death penalty constitutional issues, commentaries, and case briefs Scott Vollum, Rolando V. del Carmen, Durant Frantzen, Claudia San Miguel, Kelly Cheeseman Third edition London ; New York Routledge [2015] XXXV, 355 Seiten txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Del Carmen, Rolando V. 1930- Verfasser (DE-588)1055809805 aut Frantzen, Durant Verfasser (DE-588)1102566861 aut San Miguel, Claudia Verfasser (DE-588)1102568325 aut Cheeseman, Kelly Verfasser aut Digitalisierung UB Passau - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029139856&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis
spellingShingle	Vollum, Scott 1970- Del Carmen, Rolando V. 1930- Frantzen, Durant San Miguel, Claudia Cheeseman, Kelly The death penalty constitutional issues, commentaries, and case briefs
title	The death penalty constitutional issues, commentaries, and case briefs
title_auth	The death penalty constitutional issues, commentaries, and case briefs
title_exact_search	The death penalty constitutional issues, commentaries, and case briefs
title_full	The death penalty constitutional issues, commentaries, and case briefs Scott Vollum, Rolando V. del Carmen, Durant Frantzen, Claudia San Miguel, Kelly Cheeseman
title_fullStr	The death penalty constitutional issues, commentaries, and case briefs Scott Vollum, Rolando V. del Carmen, Durant Frantzen, Claudia San Miguel, Kelly Cheeseman
title_full_unstemmed	The death penalty constitutional issues, commentaries, and case briefs Scott Vollum, Rolando V. del Carmen, Durant Frantzen, Claudia San Miguel, Kelly Cheeseman
title_short	The death penalty
title_sort	the death penalty constitutional issues commentaries and case briefs
title_sub	constitutional issues, commentaries, and case briefs
url	http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029139856&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA
work_keys_str_mv	AT vollumscott thedeathpenaltyconstitutionalissuescommentariesandcasebriefs AT delcarmenrolandov thedeathpenaltyconstitutionalissuescommentariesandcasebriefs AT frantzendurant thedeathpenaltyconstitutionalissuescommentariesandcasebriefs AT sanmiguelclaudia thedeathpenaltyconstitutionalissuescommentariesandcasebriefs AT cheesemankelly thedeathpenaltyconstitutionalissuescommentariesandcasebriefs

Verfügbarkeit

Es ist kein Print-Exemplar vorhanden.

Fernleihe Bestellen Achtung: Nicht im THWS-Bestand! Inhaltsverzeichnis

MARC

Datensatz im Suchindex

Es ist kein Print-Exemplar vorhanden.

Ähnliche Einträge