The functions of arbitral institutions:
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Buch |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Alphen aan den Rijn
Kluwer Law International
[2016]
|
Schriftenreihe: | International arbitration law library
Volume 38 |
Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
Beschreibung: | xxvii, 252 Seiten |
ISBN: | 9789041162175 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 cb4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV043714642 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 20190221 | ||
007 | t | ||
008 | 160811s2016 |||| 00||| eng d | ||
020 | |a 9789041162175 |c hardcover |9 978-90-411-6217-5 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)991548258 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV043714642 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-M382 |a DE-29 |a DE-11 | ||
084 | |a PG 470 |0 (DE-625)135956: |2 rvk | ||
084 | |a PT 350 |0 (DE-625)139874: |2 rvk | ||
084 | |a PU 1555 |0 (DE-625)139930: |2 rvk | ||
100 | 1 | |a Gerbay, Remy |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1076917399 |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a The functions of arbitral institutions |c Rémy Gerbay |
264 | 1 | |a Alphen aan den Rijn |b Kluwer Law International |c [2016] | |
264 | 4 | |c © 2016 | |
300 | |a xxvii, 252 Seiten | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 1 | |a International arbitration law library |v Volume 38 | |
830 | 0 | |a International arbitration law library |v Volume 38 |w (DE-604)BV021465758 |9 38 | |
856 | 4 | 2 | |m SWB Datenaustausch |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029126837&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029126837 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804176502287237120 |
---|---|
adam_text | TABLE OF CONTENTS
ABOUT THE AUTHOR VII
FOREWORD XV
PREFACE XIX
LIST OF FIGURES XXI
LIST OF TABLES XXIII
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS XXV
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS XXVII
INTRODUCTION 1
CHAPTER 1
UNDERSTANDING THE NOTION OF ARBITRAL INSTITUTION: DEFINITIONS AND
TYPOLOGIES 5
§1.01 INTRODUCTION 5
§1.02 DEFINING INSTITUTIONAL ARBITRATION 6
[A] CONTINGENT DEFINITIONS: DEFINING INSTITUTIONAL ARBITRATION BY
DISTINGUISHING IT FROM NEIGHBOURING NOTIONS 6
[1] INSTITUTIONAL ARBITRATION DEFINED BY COMPARISON WITH
AD HOC ARBITRATION 6
[2] INSTITUTIONAL ARBITRATION DEFINED BY COMPARISON WITH
JUDICIAL MECHANISMS 8
[B] AN AUTONOMOUS DEFINITION: DEFINING INSTITUTIONAL ARBITRATION BY
IDENTIFYING ITS ESSENTIAL CHARACTERISTICS 11
[1] PERMANENT ORGANIZATION 12
IX
TABLE OF CONTENTS
[2] ARBITRATION RULES 13
[3] THE SERVICES 14
§1.03 DEFINING ARBITRAL INSTITUTIONS 18
§1.04 TYPOLOGIES OF ARBITRAL INSTITUTIONS 19
[A] LEGAL STATUS OF ARBITRAL INSTITUTIONS 19
[B] SELF-STANDING INDEPENDENT INSTITUTIONS VERSUS INSTITUTIONS
CONNECTED TO ANOTHER ORGANIZATION OR A STATE 21
[C] CHARITABLE VERSUS FOR-PROFIT 23
[D] TYPES OF CASES HANDLED: GENERALIST INSTITUTIONS VERSUS SPECIALIST
ONES 24
[E] DOMESTIC VERSUS INTERNATIONAL 25
[F] CULTURAL BACKGROUND AND HISTORICAL HERITAGE 26
CHAPTER 2
INSTITUTIONAL ARBITRATION AS A GROWING PHENOMENON: QUANTITATIVE GROWTH,
INSTITUTIONALIZATION AND JUDICIALIZATION 29
§2.01 INCREASING USE OF INSTITUTIONAL ARBITRATION: THE QUANTITATIVE
GROWTH 29
[A] INCREASE IN THE VOLUME OF CASES REFERRED TO INSTITUTIONS 29
[B] INCREASE IN THE NUMBER OF INSTITUTIONS 33
[C] THE RATIONALE BEHIND THE GROWTH: THE PERCEIVED BENEFITS OF
INSTITUTIONAL ARBITRATION 35
[1] LOGISTICAL SUPPORT 35
[2] PRE-ESTABLISHED ARBITRATION RULES 36
[3] AUTHORITY IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE RULES 37
[4] TREATMENT OF COSTS 38
[5] ENHANCED ENFORCEABILITY OF THE AWARD 39
[6] LOWER COSTS 39
[7] CONFIDENTIALITY 41
[D] POPULARITY OF INSTITUTIONAL ARBITRATION VERSUS LEGITIMACY OF
ARBITRAL INSTITUTIONS 43
§2.02 INSTITUTIONALIZATION OF ARBITRATION? THE ALLEGED QUALITATIVE
GROWTH 47
[A] INSTITUTIONALIZATION OF ARBITRATION 47
[B] INSTITUTIONALIZATION VERSUS JUDICIALIZATION 51
CHAPTER 3
AN OVERVIEW OF THE ACTIVITIES OF ARBITRAL INSTITUTIONS: INSTITUTIONAL
ARBITRATION AS A MULTIFACTED REALITY 55
§3.01 INTRODUCTION 55
§3.02 NON-CASEWORK ACTIVITIES 56
[A] AWARENESS RAISING, TRAINING, ADVOCACY AND POLICY 56
[BJ ACTIVITIES RELATING TO OTHER FORMS OF ADR AND AD HOC ARBITRATION 58
§3.03 CASEWORK ACTIVITIES 59
[A] THE INITIAL STAGES (UP TO THE CONSTITUTION OF THE TRIBUNAL) 60
TABLE OF CONTENTS
[I] RECEIPT AND NOTIFICATION OF THE REQUEST FOR ARBITRATION 60
[2] WHICH SETS OF RULES APPLY? 61
[3] DECISIONS ON LANGUAGE 63
[4] DECISIONS REGARDING THE SEAT OR PLACE OF THE ARBITRATION 64
[5] EXTENSION OF DEADLINES 66
[6] DECISIONS ON JURISDICTION 68
[7] INTERIM MEASURES 71
[8] CONSOLIDATION OF PROCEEDINGS 73
[9] JOINDER OF THIRD PARTIES 77
[10] CONSTITUTION OF THE TRIBUNAL: DECISION ON THE
NUMBER OF ARBITRATORS 79
[II] CONSTITUTION OF THE TRIBUNAL: SELECTION OF ARBITRATORS 80
[12] CONSTITUTION OF THE TRIBUNAL: CONFIRMATION OF ARBITRATORS 82
[B] THE PROCEEDINGS PROPER (FROM THE CONSTITUTION OF THE TRIBUNAL
TO THE AWARD) 84
[ 1 ] APPROVAL OF TERMS OF REFERENCE 84
[2] LOGISTICAL SUPPORT . 84
[3] TREATMENT OF COSTS 86
[4] CHALLENGES TO, AND REMOVAL OF, ARBITRATORS 89
[5] GENERAL POWER OF INTERPRETATION OF THE RULES 92
[6] GENERAL SUPERVISION ROLE 95
[C] THE AWARD AND POST-AWARD PHASE 100
[1] SCRUTINY OF DRAFT AWARDS 100
[2] ISSUE OF AWARDS AND ASSISTANCE WITH ENFORCEMENT 103
§3.04 DIFFERENT LEVELS OF INSTITUTIONAL INVOLVEMENT EXPRESSED AS A
CONTINUUM: THE SPECTRAL REPRESENTATION OF INSTITUTIONAL ARBITRATION 104
[A] WHY A CONTINUUM? 104
[B] CAVEAT: LIMITATIONS OF THE SPECTRAL REPRESENTATION OF
INSTITUTIONAL ARBITRATION 107
[C] FIRST CONTINUUM: FROM THE FILING OF A REQUEST FOR ARBITRATION
TO THE CONSTITUTION OF THE TRIBUNAL 109
[D] SECOND CONTINUUM: FROM THE CONSTITUTION OF THE TRIBUNAL TO
THE AWARD 112
§3.05 CHAPTER CONCLUSIONS 115
CHAPTER 4
THE TRADITIONAL REPRESENTATIONS OF THE ROLE OF INSTITUTIONS: A CRITICAL
EVALUATION 117
§4.01 CHAPTER INTRODUCTION 117
§4.02 FIRST REPRESENTATION: AN OCCASIONAL PARTICIPANT IN THE
ADJUDICATIVE
PROCESS WHICH DECISIONS ARE SOMEHOW IMMATERIAL 118
[A] PRESENTATION OF THE REPRESENTATION 118
XI
TABLE OF CONTENTS
[1] SHORT OVERVIEW 118
[2] RATIONALE BEHIND THE REPRESENTATION: THE
NON-APPLICABILITY OF DUE PROCESS REQUIREMENTS,
AND THE NECESSITY TO PRESERVE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF
INSTITUTIONAL ARBITRATION 123
[3] ORIGINS AND HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE FIRST
REPRESENTATION 125
[A] THE SOCI&E APPAREILS DRAGON CASE 126
[B] THE SOCIETE TECHNI IMPORT PROFESSIONAL CASE 129
[C] THE SYRIAN REFINERIES CASE 130
[D] THE OPINTER V. DACOMEX CASE 133
[E] THE SCPA CASE 135
[F] THE REDEC AND PHARAON CASE 13 7
[G] THE CUBIC DEFENSE SYSTEM CASE 139
[H] THE GUINEA V. CAP CASE 142
[I] RECENT DECISIONS 144
[B] CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE FIRST REPRESENTATION: REJECTION OF THE
ADMINISTRATIVE VERSUS JURISDICTIONAT DICHOTOMY 147
[1] REJECTION OF THE ARGUMENTS BASED ON MATERIAL CRITERIA 148
[A] ARGUMENT BASED ON THE LACK OF FINALITY OF THE
INSTITUTIONAL DECISIONS 149
[B] ARGUMENT BASED ON THE TIMING OF INSTITUTIONAL
DECISIONS 151
[C] ARGUMENTS THAT INSTITUTIONAL DECISIONS DO NOT
DECIDE BETWEEN TWO CONFLICTING POSITIONS 153
[D] ARGUMENTS BASED ON THE ALLEGED ORGANIZATIONAL
CHARACTER OF INSTITUTIONAL DECISIONS 155
[2] REJECTION OF THE ARGUMENTS BASED ON ORGANIC CRITERIA 158
[A] ARGUMENT THAT INSTITUTIONS ARE NOT ARBITRATORS 158
[B] ARGUMENT THAT THE PARTIES HAVE AGREED TO CONFER A
NON-JURISDICTIONAL FUNCTION TO THE INSTITUTION 160
[C] ARGUMENTS BASED ON AN ALLEGED UNITY OF THE
ADJUDICATIVE MISSION OF THE ARBITRATOR 163
[C] CONCLUSIONS ON THE FIRST REPRESENTATION 172
§4.03 SECOND REPRESENTATION: A MERE PURVEYOR OF LOGISTICAL SERVICES WITH
NO DECISION-MAKING POWER AT ALL 173
[A] PRESENTATION OF THE REPRESENTATION 173
[B] CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE REPRESENTATION: INSTITUTIONS DO HAVE A
MEASURE OF DECISION-MAKING POWER 175
[C] CONCLUSIONS ON THE SECOND REPRESENTATION 182
§4.04 CHAPTER CONCLUSIONS 183
XN
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER 5
A REALISTIC REPRESENTATION OF THE ROLE OF INSTITUTIONS: ARBITRAL
INSTITUTIONS AS
ANCILLARY PARTICIPANTS IN THE ADJUDICATIVE PROCESS 185
§5.01 INTRODUCTION 185
§5.02 SUBSTANCE OF THE REPRESENTATION 187
[A] PROPOSITION 1: THE DECISIONAL CHARACTER OF CERTAIN INSTITUTIONAL
MEASURES 187
[B] PROPOSITION 2: ANCILLARY NATURE OF THE ROLE OF THE INSTITUTION 188
[C] PROPOSITION 3: MATERIALITY OF INSTITUTIONAL DECISIONS 188
[D] PROPOSITION 4: THE REJECTION OF DICHOTOMIC APPROACHES 196
§5.03 CONSEQUENCES OF THE REPRESENTATION 196
[A] PROPOSITION 5; DESIRABILITY OF THE APPLICATION OF DUE PROCESS BY
INSTITUTIONS WHEN THEY PARTICIPATE IN THE ADJUDICATIVE MISSION 196
[B] PROPOSITION 6: IDENTIFICATION OF THE ASPECTS OF DUE PROCESS THAT
ARE RELEVANT TO THE ACTIVITIES OF ARBITRAL INSTITUTIONS 199
[ 1 ] IMPARTIALITY AND INDEPENDENCE 199
[2] EQUAL TREATMENT OF THE PARTIES 202
[3] ADVERSARIAL PROCESS 204
[4] REASONING 205
[5] JUDICIAL REVIEW OF INSTITUTIONAL DECISIONS 207
[C] PROPOSITION 7: MATERIALITY OF A DECISION AS A VIABLE PROXY FOR
DETERMINING TO WHAT EXTENT DUE PROCESS SHOULD BE COMPLIED
WITH 209
§5.04 CHAPTER CONCLUSIONS 210
CHAPTER 6
GENERAL CONCLUSIONS
213
APPENDIX
TEMPLATE OF QUESTIONNAIRE SENT OUT TO ARBITRAL INSTITUTIONS 217
BIBLIOGRAPHY
221
TABLE OF CASES
237
TABLE OF ARBITRATION RULES EXAMINED 241
INDEX
247
XLLL
|
any_adam_object | 1 |
author | Gerbay, Remy |
author_GND | (DE-588)1076917399 |
author_facet | Gerbay, Remy |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Gerbay, Remy |
author_variant | r g rg |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV043714642 |
classification_rvk | PG 470 PT 350 PU 1555 |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)991548258 (DE-599)BVBBV043714642 |
discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
format | Book |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01335nam a2200337 cb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV043714642</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20190221 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160811s2016 |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9789041162175</subfield><subfield code="c">hardcover</subfield><subfield code="9">978-90-411-6217-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)991548258</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV043714642</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-M382</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-29</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PG 470</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)135956:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PT 350</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)139874:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PU 1555</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)139930:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gerbay, Remy</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1076917399</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The functions of arbitral institutions</subfield><subfield code="c">Rémy Gerbay</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Alphen aan den Rijn</subfield><subfield code="b">Kluwer Law International</subfield><subfield code="c">[2016]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="c">© 2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xxvii, 252 Seiten</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">International arbitration law library</subfield><subfield code="v">Volume 38</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">International arbitration law library</subfield><subfield code="v">Volume 38</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV021465758</subfield><subfield code="9">38</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">SWB Datenaustausch</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029126837&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029126837</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV043714642 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-07-10T07:33:12Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 9789041162175 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029126837 |
oclc_num | 991548258 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-M382 DE-29 DE-11 |
owner_facet | DE-M382 DE-29 DE-11 |
physical | xxvii, 252 Seiten |
publishDate | 2016 |
publishDateSearch | 2016 |
publishDateSort | 2016 |
publisher | Kluwer Law International |
record_format | marc |
series | International arbitration law library |
series2 | International arbitration law library |
spelling | Gerbay, Remy Verfasser (DE-588)1076917399 aut The functions of arbitral institutions Rémy Gerbay Alphen aan den Rijn Kluwer Law International [2016] © 2016 xxvii, 252 Seiten txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier International arbitration law library Volume 38 International arbitration law library Volume 38 (DE-604)BV021465758 38 SWB Datenaustausch application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029126837&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
spellingShingle | Gerbay, Remy The functions of arbitral institutions International arbitration law library |
title | The functions of arbitral institutions |
title_auth | The functions of arbitral institutions |
title_exact_search | The functions of arbitral institutions |
title_full | The functions of arbitral institutions Rémy Gerbay |
title_fullStr | The functions of arbitral institutions Rémy Gerbay |
title_full_unstemmed | The functions of arbitral institutions Rémy Gerbay |
title_short | The functions of arbitral institutions |
title_sort | the functions of arbitral institutions |
url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029126837&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
volume_link | (DE-604)BV021465758 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gerbayremy thefunctionsofarbitralinstitutions |