Explanation and Progress in Security Studies: Bridging Theoretical Divides in International Relations
Explanation and Progress in Security Studies asks why Security Studies, as a central area of International Relations, has not experienced scientific progress in the way natural sciences have-and answers by arguing that the underlying reason is that scholars in Security Studies have advanced a range...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Palo Alto
Stanford University Press
2014
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Zusammenfassung: | Explanation and Progress in Security Studies asks why Security Studies, as a central area of International Relations, has not experienced scientific progress in the way natural sciences have-and answers by arguing that the underlying reason is that scholars in Security Studies have advanced a range of different notions of "explanation" or different criteria of "explanatory superiority" to show that their positions are better than rival positions.To demonstrate this, the author engages in in-depth content analysis of the generally recognized exemplars of explanation and explanatory superiority in three of the core debates in the disciplines: Why do states pursue policies of nuclear proliferation? Why do states choose to form the alliances they do? And why do liberal democratic states behave the way they do toward other liberal democracies?The book reveals that authors in the debates that have shown the most progress use similar criteria in arguing for and against the key explanations. In the nuclear proliferation debate, there is wide divergence in the criteria the most visible authors use, and there is wide divergence in the explanations offered. In the alliance formation/balance-of-power debate, there is some overlap of criteria the most important authors use, and there has been some limited movement toward consensus. In the democratic peace debate there has been much more overlap of criteria the most prominent authors use, and there is agreement on both some positive and negative conclusions |
| Beschreibung: | Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources |
| Beschreibung: | 1 online resource (324 pages) |
| ISBN: | 9780804792295 9780804790956 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV043610990 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 160616s2014 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9780804792295 |9 978-0-8047-9229-5 | ||
| 020 | |a 9780804790956 |c Print |9 978-0-8047-9095-6 | ||
| 035 | |a (ZDB-30-PQE)EBC1742618 | ||
| 035 | |a (ZDB-89-EBL)EBL1742618 | ||
| 035 | |a (ZDB-38-EBR)ebr10895703 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)884280021 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV043610990 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 082 | 0 | |a 327.101 | |
| 100 | 1 | |a Chernoff, Fred |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Explanation and Progress in Security Studies |b Bridging Theoretical Divides in International Relations |
| 264 | 1 | |a Palo Alto |b Stanford University Press |c 2014 | |
| 264 | 4 | |c © 2014 | |
| 300 | |a 1 online resource (324 pages) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources | ||
| 520 | |a Explanation and Progress in Security Studies asks why Security Studies, as a central area of International Relations, has not experienced scientific progress in the way natural sciences have-and answers by arguing that the underlying reason is that scholars in Security Studies have advanced a range of different notions of "explanation" or different criteria of "explanatory superiority" to show that their positions are better than rival positions.To demonstrate this, the author engages in in-depth content analysis of the generally recognized exemplars of explanation and explanatory superiority in three of the core debates in the disciplines: Why do states pursue policies of nuclear proliferation? Why do states choose to form the alliances they do? And why do liberal democratic states behave the way they do toward other liberal democracies?The book reveals that authors in the debates that have shown the most progress use similar criteria in arguing for and against the key explanations. In the nuclear proliferation debate, there is wide divergence in the criteria the most visible authors use, and there is wide divergence in the explanations offered. In the alliance formation/balance-of-power debate, there is some overlap of criteria the most important authors use, and there has been some limited movement toward consensus. In the democratic peace debate there has been much more overlap of criteria the most prominent authors use, and there is agreement on both some positive and negative conclusions | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Internationale Politik | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Philosophie | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Explanation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a International relations -- Methodology | |
| 650 | 4 | |a International relations -- Philosophy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Security, International | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Internationale Politik |0 (DE-588)4072885-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Sicherheitspolitik |0 (DE-588)4116489-1 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Erklärung |0 (DE-588)4015293-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Theorie |0 (DE-588)4059787-8 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Wissenschaftlicher Fortschritt |0 (DE-588)4190101-0 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Sicherheitspolitik |0 (DE-588)4116489-1 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Internationale Politik |0 (DE-588)4072885-7 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Theorie |0 (DE-588)4059787-8 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |a Wissenschaftlicher Fortschritt |0 (DE-588)4190101-0 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 4 | |a Erklärung |0 (DE-588)4015293-5 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |8 1\p |5 DE-604 | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe |a Chernoff, Fred |t Explanation and Progress in Security Studies : Bridging Theoretical Divides in International Relations |
| 912 | |a ZDB-30-PQE | ||
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029025049 | ||
| 883 | 1 | |8 1\p |a cgwrk |d 20201028 |q DE-101 |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804176356108402688 |
|---|---|
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Chernoff, Fred |
| author_facet | Chernoff, Fred |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Chernoff, Fred |
| author_variant | f c fc |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV043610990 |
| collection | ZDB-30-PQE |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-30-PQE)EBC1742618 (ZDB-89-EBL)EBL1742618 (ZDB-38-EBR)ebr10895703 (OCoLC)884280021 (DE-599)BVBBV043610990 |
| dewey-full | 327.101 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 327 - International relations |
| dewey-raw | 327.101 |
| dewey-search | 327.101 |
| dewey-sort | 3327.101 |
| dewey-tens | 320 - Political science (Politics and government) |
| discipline | Politologie |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03785nmm a2200577zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV043610990</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160616s2014 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780804792295</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-8047-9229-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780804790956</subfield><subfield code="c">Print</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-8047-9095-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-30-PQE)EBC1742618</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-89-EBL)EBL1742618</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-38-EBR)ebr10895703</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)884280021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV043610990</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">327.101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Chernoff, Fred</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Explanation and Progress in Security Studies</subfield><subfield code="b">Bridging Theoretical Divides in International Relations</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Palo Alto</subfield><subfield code="b">Stanford University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="c">© 2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (324 pages)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Explanation and Progress in Security Studies asks why Security Studies, as a central area of International Relations, has not experienced scientific progress in the way natural sciences have-and answers by arguing that the underlying reason is that scholars in Security Studies have advanced a range of different notions of "explanation" or different criteria of "explanatory superiority" to show that their positions are better than rival positions.To demonstrate this, the author engages in in-depth content analysis of the generally recognized exemplars of explanation and explanatory superiority in three of the core debates in the disciplines: Why do states pursue policies of nuclear proliferation? Why do states choose to form the alliances they do? And why do liberal democratic states behave the way they do toward other liberal democracies?The book reveals that authors in the debates that have shown the most progress use similar criteria in arguing for and against the key explanations. In the nuclear proliferation debate, there is wide divergence in the criteria the most visible authors use, and there is wide divergence in the explanations offered. In the alliance formation/balance-of-power debate, there is some overlap of criteria the most important authors use, and there has been some limited movement toward consensus. In the democratic peace debate there has been much more overlap of criteria the most prominent authors use, and there is agreement on both some positive and negative conclusions</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Internationale Politik</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Philosophie</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Explanation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">International relations -- Methodology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">International relations -- Philosophy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Security, International</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Internationale Politik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4072885-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Sicherheitspolitik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4116489-1</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Erklärung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4015293-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Theorie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4059787-8</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Wissenschaftlicher Fortschritt</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4190101-0</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Sicherheitspolitik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4116489-1</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Internationale Politik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4072885-7</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Theorie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4059787-8</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Wissenschaftlicher Fortschritt</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4190101-0</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Erklärung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4015293-5</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="a">Chernoff, Fred</subfield><subfield code="t">Explanation and Progress in Security Studies : Bridging Theoretical Divides in International Relations</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-30-PQE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029025049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="883" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="a">cgwrk</subfield><subfield code="d">20201028</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-101</subfield><subfield code="u">https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV043610990 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T07:30:53Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9780804792295 9780804790956 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029025049 |
| oclc_num | 884280021 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| physical | 1 online resource (324 pages) |
| psigel | ZDB-30-PQE |
| publishDate | 2014 |
| publishDateSearch | 2014 |
| publishDateSort | 2014 |
| publisher | Stanford University Press |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Chernoff, Fred Verfasser aut Explanation and Progress in Security Studies Bridging Theoretical Divides in International Relations Palo Alto Stanford University Press 2014 © 2014 1 online resource (324 pages) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources Explanation and Progress in Security Studies asks why Security Studies, as a central area of International Relations, has not experienced scientific progress in the way natural sciences have-and answers by arguing that the underlying reason is that scholars in Security Studies have advanced a range of different notions of "explanation" or different criteria of "explanatory superiority" to show that their positions are better than rival positions.To demonstrate this, the author engages in in-depth content analysis of the generally recognized exemplars of explanation and explanatory superiority in three of the core debates in the disciplines: Why do states pursue policies of nuclear proliferation? Why do states choose to form the alliances they do? And why do liberal democratic states behave the way they do toward other liberal democracies?The book reveals that authors in the debates that have shown the most progress use similar criteria in arguing for and against the key explanations. In the nuclear proliferation debate, there is wide divergence in the criteria the most visible authors use, and there is wide divergence in the explanations offered. In the alliance formation/balance-of-power debate, there is some overlap of criteria the most important authors use, and there has been some limited movement toward consensus. In the democratic peace debate there has been much more overlap of criteria the most prominent authors use, and there is agreement on both some positive and negative conclusions Internationale Politik Philosophie Explanation International relations -- Methodology International relations -- Philosophy Security, International Internationale Politik (DE-588)4072885-7 gnd rswk-swf Sicherheitspolitik (DE-588)4116489-1 gnd rswk-swf Erklärung (DE-588)4015293-5 gnd rswk-swf Theorie (DE-588)4059787-8 gnd rswk-swf Wissenschaftlicher Fortschritt (DE-588)4190101-0 gnd rswk-swf Sicherheitspolitik (DE-588)4116489-1 s Internationale Politik (DE-588)4072885-7 s Theorie (DE-588)4059787-8 s Wissenschaftlicher Fortschritt (DE-588)4190101-0 s Erklärung (DE-588)4015293-5 s 1\p DE-604 Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe Chernoff, Fred Explanation and Progress in Security Studies : Bridging Theoretical Divides in International Relations 1\p cgwrk 20201028 DE-101 https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk |
| spellingShingle | Chernoff, Fred Explanation and Progress in Security Studies Bridging Theoretical Divides in International Relations Internationale Politik Philosophie Explanation International relations -- Methodology International relations -- Philosophy Security, International Internationale Politik (DE-588)4072885-7 gnd Sicherheitspolitik (DE-588)4116489-1 gnd Erklärung (DE-588)4015293-5 gnd Theorie (DE-588)4059787-8 gnd Wissenschaftlicher Fortschritt (DE-588)4190101-0 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4072885-7 (DE-588)4116489-1 (DE-588)4015293-5 (DE-588)4059787-8 (DE-588)4190101-0 |
| title | Explanation and Progress in Security Studies Bridging Theoretical Divides in International Relations |
| title_auth | Explanation and Progress in Security Studies Bridging Theoretical Divides in International Relations |
| title_exact_search | Explanation and Progress in Security Studies Bridging Theoretical Divides in International Relations |
| title_full | Explanation and Progress in Security Studies Bridging Theoretical Divides in International Relations |
| title_fullStr | Explanation and Progress in Security Studies Bridging Theoretical Divides in International Relations |
| title_full_unstemmed | Explanation and Progress in Security Studies Bridging Theoretical Divides in International Relations |
| title_short | Explanation and Progress in Security Studies |
| title_sort | explanation and progress in security studies bridging theoretical divides in international relations |
| title_sub | Bridging Theoretical Divides in International Relations |
| topic | Internationale Politik Philosophie Explanation International relations -- Methodology International relations -- Philosophy Security, International Internationale Politik (DE-588)4072885-7 gnd Sicherheitspolitik (DE-588)4116489-1 gnd Erklärung (DE-588)4015293-5 gnd Theorie (DE-588)4059787-8 gnd Wissenschaftlicher Fortschritt (DE-588)4190101-0 gnd |
| topic_facet | Internationale Politik Philosophie Explanation International relations -- Methodology International relations -- Philosophy Security, International Sicherheitspolitik Erklärung Theorie Wissenschaftlicher Fortschritt |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT chernofffred explanationandprogressinsecuritystudiesbridgingtheoreticaldividesininternationalrelations |