Sovereignty and Justice: Balancing the Principle of Complementarity between International and Domestic War Crimes Tribunals
The drafters of the ICC's founding document, the Rome Statute, foresaw what would become the main challenge to the Court's legitimacy: that it could violate national sovereignty. To address this concern, the drafters added the principle of complementarity to the ICC's jurisdiction, in...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge
Cambridge Scholars Publishing
2014
|
| Ausgabe: | 1st ed |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Zusammenfassung: | The drafters of the ICC's founding document, the Rome Statute, foresaw what would become the main challenge to the Court's legitimacy: that it could violate national sovereignty. To address this concern, the drafters added the principle of complementarity to the ICC's jurisdiction, in that the Court's province merely complements the exercise of jurisdiction by the domestic courts of the Statute's member states. The ICC honours the authority of those states to conduct their own trials. This book asserts that the principle of complementarity, both dynamic and powerful, is the key legal underpinning for domestic jurisdiction of international crimes, and has been the impetus for the rise of a new trend toward domestic war crimes prosecutions. However, if the principle of complementarity is to be applied, states must ensure that their own judicial systems and trials are consistent with international standards of independence and fairness. At a minimum, states will have to adhere to standards of due process found in international human rights instruments. In addition, for complementarity to work, the ICC must be willing to actively support, embrace, and implement the principle. If the Court holds on too tightly to a self-aggrandising view of its role in promoting international justice, then it will lose all credibility in the eyes of nation states. Finally, the international community, in calling on states to address war crimes committed within their borders, must provide some of the financial, technical, and professional resources that many struggling states need in this endeavour. This book sets forth several innovative recommendations to fulfil these goals in order to strengthen and unify the principle of complementarity between the ICC and nation states so as to make future domestic war crimes courts work more effectively |
| Beschreibung: | Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources |
| Beschreibung: | 1 online resource (346 pages) |
| ISBN: | 9781443859653 9781443857048 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV043610153 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 160616s2014 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9781443859653 |9 978-1-4438-5965-3 | ||
| 020 | |a 9781443857048 |c Print |9 978-1-4438-5704-8 | ||
| 035 | |a (ZDB-30-PQE)EBC1706881 | ||
| 035 | |a (ZDB-89-EBL)EBL1706881 | ||
| 035 | |a (ZDB-38-EBR)ebr10879363 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)881368193 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV043610153 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 082 | 0 | |a 341.690268 | |
| 100 | 1 | |a Ellis, Mark S. |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Sovereignty and Justice |b Balancing the Principle of Complementarity between International and Domestic War Crimes Tribunals |
| 250 | |a 1st ed | ||
| 264 | 1 | |a Cambridge |b Cambridge Scholars Publishing |c 2014 | |
| 264 | 4 | |c © 2014 | |
| 300 | |a 1 online resource (346 pages) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources | ||
| 520 | |a The drafters of the ICC's founding document, the Rome Statute, foresaw what would become the main challenge to the Court's legitimacy: that it could violate national sovereignty. To address this concern, the drafters added the principle of complementarity to the ICC's jurisdiction, in that the Court's province merely complements the exercise of jurisdiction by the domestic courts of the Statute's member states. The ICC honours the authority of those states to conduct their own trials. This book asserts that the principle of complementarity, both dynamic and powerful, is the key legal underpinning for domestic jurisdiction of international crimes, and has been the impetus for the rise of a new trend toward domestic war crimes prosecutions. However, if the principle of complementarity is to be applied, states must ensure that their own judicial systems and trials are consistent with international standards of independence and fairness. At a minimum, states will have to adhere to standards of due process found in international human rights instruments. In addition, for complementarity to work, the ICC must be willing to actively support, embrace, and implement the principle. If the Court holds on too tightly to a self-aggrandising view of its role in promoting international justice, then it will lose all credibility in the eyes of nation states. Finally, the international community, in calling on states to address war crimes committed within their borders, must provide some of the financial, technical, and professional resources that many struggling states need in this endeavour. This book sets forth several innovative recommendations to fulfil these goals in order to strengthen and unify the principle of complementarity between the ICC and nation states so as to make future domestic war crimes courts work more effectively | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a War crime trials | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Kriegsverbrechen |0 (DE-588)4033151-9 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Kriegsverbrecherprozess |0 (DE-588)4033154-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Internationale Strafgerichtsbarkeit |0 (DE-588)4542351-9 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Kriegsverbrechen |0 (DE-588)4033151-9 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Kriegsverbrecherprozess |0 (DE-588)4033154-4 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Internationale Strafgerichtsbarkeit |0 (DE-588)4542351-9 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |8 1\p |5 DE-604 | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe |a Ellis, Mark S |t . Sovereignty and Justice : Balancing the Principle of Complementarity between International and Domestic War Crimes Tribunals |
| 912 | |a ZDB-30-PQE | ||
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029024212 | ||
| 883 | 1 | |8 1\p |a cgwrk |d 20201028 |q DE-101 |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804176355748741120 |
|---|---|
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Ellis, Mark S. |
| author_facet | Ellis, Mark S. |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Ellis, Mark S. |
| author_variant | m s e ms mse |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV043610153 |
| collection | ZDB-30-PQE |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-30-PQE)EBC1706881 (ZDB-89-EBL)EBL1706881 (ZDB-38-EBR)ebr10879363 (OCoLC)881368193 (DE-599)BVBBV043610153 |
| dewey-full | 341.690268 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 341 - Law of nations |
| dewey-raw | 341.690268 |
| dewey-search | 341.690268 |
| dewey-sort | 3341.690268 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| edition | 1st ed |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03776nmm a2200481zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV043610153</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160616s2014 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781443859653</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-4438-5965-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781443857048</subfield><subfield code="c">Print</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-4438-5704-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-30-PQE)EBC1706881</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-89-EBL)EBL1706881</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-38-EBR)ebr10879363</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)881368193</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV043610153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">341.690268</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ellis, Mark S.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Sovereignty and Justice</subfield><subfield code="b">Balancing the Principle of Complementarity between International and Domestic War Crimes Tribunals</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1st ed</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cambridge</subfield><subfield code="b">Cambridge Scholars Publishing</subfield><subfield code="c">2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="c">© 2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (346 pages)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The drafters of the ICC's founding document, the Rome Statute, foresaw what would become the main challenge to the Court's legitimacy: that it could violate national sovereignty. To address this concern, the drafters added the principle of complementarity to the ICC's jurisdiction, in that the Court's province merely complements the exercise of jurisdiction by the domestic courts of the Statute's member states. The ICC honours the authority of those states to conduct their own trials. This book asserts that the principle of complementarity, both dynamic and powerful, is the key legal underpinning for domestic jurisdiction of international crimes, and has been the impetus for the rise of a new trend toward domestic war crimes prosecutions. However, if the principle of complementarity is to be applied, states must ensure that their own judicial systems and trials are consistent with international standards of independence and fairness. At a minimum, states will have to adhere to standards of due process found in international human rights instruments. In addition, for complementarity to work, the ICC must be willing to actively support, embrace, and implement the principle. If the Court holds on too tightly to a self-aggrandising view of its role in promoting international justice, then it will lose all credibility in the eyes of nation states. Finally, the international community, in calling on states to address war crimes committed within their borders, must provide some of the financial, technical, and professional resources that many struggling states need in this endeavour. This book sets forth several innovative recommendations to fulfil these goals in order to strengthen and unify the principle of complementarity between the ICC and nation states so as to make future domestic war crimes courts work more effectively</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">War crime trials</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Kriegsverbrechen</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4033151-9</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Kriegsverbrecherprozess</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4033154-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Internationale Strafgerichtsbarkeit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4542351-9</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Kriegsverbrechen</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4033151-9</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Kriegsverbrecherprozess</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4033154-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Internationale Strafgerichtsbarkeit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4542351-9</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="a">Ellis, Mark S</subfield><subfield code="t">. Sovereignty and Justice : Balancing the Principle of Complementarity between International and Domestic War Crimes Tribunals</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-30-PQE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029024212</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="883" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="a">cgwrk</subfield><subfield code="d">20201028</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-101</subfield><subfield code="u">https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV043610153 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T07:30:52Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9781443859653 9781443857048 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029024212 |
| oclc_num | 881368193 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| physical | 1 online resource (346 pages) |
| psigel | ZDB-30-PQE |
| publishDate | 2014 |
| publishDateSearch | 2014 |
| publishDateSort | 2014 |
| publisher | Cambridge Scholars Publishing |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Ellis, Mark S. Verfasser aut Sovereignty and Justice Balancing the Principle of Complementarity between International and Domestic War Crimes Tribunals 1st ed Cambridge Cambridge Scholars Publishing 2014 © 2014 1 online resource (346 pages) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources The drafters of the ICC's founding document, the Rome Statute, foresaw what would become the main challenge to the Court's legitimacy: that it could violate national sovereignty. To address this concern, the drafters added the principle of complementarity to the ICC's jurisdiction, in that the Court's province merely complements the exercise of jurisdiction by the domestic courts of the Statute's member states. The ICC honours the authority of those states to conduct their own trials. This book asserts that the principle of complementarity, both dynamic and powerful, is the key legal underpinning for domestic jurisdiction of international crimes, and has been the impetus for the rise of a new trend toward domestic war crimes prosecutions. However, if the principle of complementarity is to be applied, states must ensure that their own judicial systems and trials are consistent with international standards of independence and fairness. At a minimum, states will have to adhere to standards of due process found in international human rights instruments. In addition, for complementarity to work, the ICC must be willing to actively support, embrace, and implement the principle. If the Court holds on too tightly to a self-aggrandising view of its role in promoting international justice, then it will lose all credibility in the eyes of nation states. Finally, the international community, in calling on states to address war crimes committed within their borders, must provide some of the financial, technical, and professional resources that many struggling states need in this endeavour. This book sets forth several innovative recommendations to fulfil these goals in order to strengthen and unify the principle of complementarity between the ICC and nation states so as to make future domestic war crimes courts work more effectively War crime trials Kriegsverbrechen (DE-588)4033151-9 gnd rswk-swf Kriegsverbrecherprozess (DE-588)4033154-4 gnd rswk-swf Internationale Strafgerichtsbarkeit (DE-588)4542351-9 gnd rswk-swf Kriegsverbrechen (DE-588)4033151-9 s Kriegsverbrecherprozess (DE-588)4033154-4 s Internationale Strafgerichtsbarkeit (DE-588)4542351-9 s 1\p DE-604 Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe Ellis, Mark S . Sovereignty and Justice : Balancing the Principle of Complementarity between International and Domestic War Crimes Tribunals 1\p cgwrk 20201028 DE-101 https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk |
| spellingShingle | Ellis, Mark S. Sovereignty and Justice Balancing the Principle of Complementarity between International and Domestic War Crimes Tribunals War crime trials Kriegsverbrechen (DE-588)4033151-9 gnd Kriegsverbrecherprozess (DE-588)4033154-4 gnd Internationale Strafgerichtsbarkeit (DE-588)4542351-9 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4033151-9 (DE-588)4033154-4 (DE-588)4542351-9 |
| title | Sovereignty and Justice Balancing the Principle of Complementarity between International and Domestic War Crimes Tribunals |
| title_auth | Sovereignty and Justice Balancing the Principle of Complementarity between International and Domestic War Crimes Tribunals |
| title_exact_search | Sovereignty and Justice Balancing the Principle of Complementarity between International and Domestic War Crimes Tribunals |
| title_full | Sovereignty and Justice Balancing the Principle of Complementarity between International and Domestic War Crimes Tribunals |
| title_fullStr | Sovereignty and Justice Balancing the Principle of Complementarity between International and Domestic War Crimes Tribunals |
| title_full_unstemmed | Sovereignty and Justice Balancing the Principle of Complementarity between International and Domestic War Crimes Tribunals |
| title_short | Sovereignty and Justice |
| title_sort | sovereignty and justice balancing the principle of complementarity between international and domestic war crimes tribunals |
| title_sub | Balancing the Principle of Complementarity between International and Domestic War Crimes Tribunals |
| topic | War crime trials Kriegsverbrechen (DE-588)4033151-9 gnd Kriegsverbrecherprozess (DE-588)4033154-4 gnd Internationale Strafgerichtsbarkeit (DE-588)4542351-9 gnd |
| topic_facet | War crime trials Kriegsverbrechen Kriegsverbrecherprozess Internationale Strafgerichtsbarkeit |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT ellismarks sovereigntyandjusticebalancingtheprincipleofcomplementaritybetweeninternationalanddomesticwarcrimestribunals |