Proportionality and Deference in Investor-State Arbitration: Balancing Investment Protection and Regulatory Autonomy
In this study, Caroline Henckels examines how investment tribunals have balanced the competing interests of host states and foreign investors in determining state liability in disputes concerning the exercise of public power. Analyzing the concepts of proportionality and deference in investment trib...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge
Cambridge University Press
2015
|
| Schriftenreihe: | Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law
no. 122 |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | BSB01 UBG01 Volltext |
| Zusammenfassung: | In this study, Caroline Henckels examines how investment tribunals have balanced the competing interests of host states and foreign investors in determining state liability in disputes concerning the exercise of public power. Analyzing the concepts of proportionality and deference in investment tribunals' decision-making in comparative perspective, the book proposes a new methodology for investment tribunals to adopt in regulatory disputes, which combines proportionality analysis with an institutionally sensitive approach to the standard of review. Henckels argues that adopting a modified form of proportionality analysis would provide a means for tribunals to decide cases in a more consistent and coherent manner leading to greater certainty for both states and investors, and that affording due deference to host states in the determination of liability would address the concern that the decisions of investment tribunals unjustifiably impact on the regulatory autonomy of states |
| Beschreibung: | Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 12 Feb 2016) |
| Beschreibung: | 1 online resource (266 pages) |
| ISBN: | 9781107087903 9781316104378 |
| DOI: | 10.1017/CBO9781316104378 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zcb4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV043542183 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 160506s2015 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9781107087903 |9 978-1-107-08790-3 | ||
| 020 | |a 9781316104378 |c Online |9 978-1-316-10437-8 | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/CBO9781316104378 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (ZDB-20-CBO)CR9781316104378 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)949926225 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV043542183 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-473 | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 346/.092 |2 23 | |
| 084 | |a PR 2353 |0 (DE-625)139576: |2 rvk | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Henckels, Caroline |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Proportionality and Deference in Investor-State Arbitration |b Balancing Investment Protection and Regulatory Autonomy |c Caroline Henckels |
| 246 | 1 | 3 | |a Proportionality & Deference in Investor-State Arbitration |
| 264 | 1 | |a Cambridge |b Cambridge University Press |c 2015 | |
| 300 | |a 1 online resource (266 pages) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law |v no. 122 | |
| 500 | |a Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 12 Feb 2016) | ||
| 520 | |a In this study, Caroline Henckels examines how investment tribunals have balanced the competing interests of host states and foreign investors in determining state liability in disputes concerning the exercise of public power. Analyzing the concepts of proportionality and deference in investment tribunals' decision-making in comparative perspective, the book proposes a new methodology for investment tribunals to adopt in regulatory disputes, which combines proportionality analysis with an institutionally sensitive approach to the standard of review. Henckels argues that adopting a modified form of proportionality analysis would provide a means for tribunals to decide cases in a more consistent and coherent manner leading to greater certainty for both states and investors, and that affording due deference to host states in the determination of liability would address the concern that the decisions of investment tribunals unjustifiably impact on the regulatory autonomy of states | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Investments, Foreign (International law) | |
| 650 | 4 | |a International commercial arbitration | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Proportionality in law | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Respect | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druckausgabe |z 978-1-107-08790-3 |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druckausgabe |z 978-1-107-45817-8 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316104378 |x Verlag |z URL des Erstveröffentlichers |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a ZDB-20-CBO | ||
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-028957629 | ||
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316104378 |l BSB01 |p ZDB-20-CBO |q BSB_PDA_CBO |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316104378 |l UBG01 |p ZDB-20-CBO |q UBG_PDA_CBO |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804176200192491520 |
|---|---|
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Henckels, Caroline |
| author_facet | Henckels, Caroline |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Henckels, Caroline |
| author_variant | c h ch |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV043542183 |
| classification_rvk | PR 2353 |
| collection | ZDB-20-CBO |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-20-CBO)CR9781316104378 (OCoLC)949926225 (DE-599)BVBBV043542183 |
| dewey-full | 346/.092 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 346 - Private law |
| dewey-raw | 346/.092 |
| dewey-search | 346/.092 |
| dewey-sort | 3346 292 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/CBO9781316104378 |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02958nmm a2200481zcb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV043542183</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160506s2015 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781107087903</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-107-08790-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781316104378</subfield><subfield code="c">Online</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-316-10437-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1017/CBO9781316104378</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-20-CBO)CR9781316104378</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)949926225</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV043542183</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">346/.092</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PR 2353</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)139576:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Henckels, Caroline</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Proportionality and Deference in Investor-State Arbitration</subfield><subfield code="b">Balancing Investment Protection and Regulatory Autonomy</subfield><subfield code="c">Caroline Henckels</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="246" ind1="1" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Proportionality & Deference in Investor-State Arbitration</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cambridge</subfield><subfield code="b">Cambridge University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (266 pages)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law</subfield><subfield code="v">no. 122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 12 Feb 2016)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In this study, Caroline Henckels examines how investment tribunals have balanced the competing interests of host states and foreign investors in determining state liability in disputes concerning the exercise of public power. Analyzing the concepts of proportionality and deference in investment tribunals' decision-making in comparative perspective, the book proposes a new methodology for investment tribunals to adopt in regulatory disputes, which combines proportionality analysis with an institutionally sensitive approach to the standard of review. Henckels argues that adopting a modified form of proportionality analysis would provide a means for tribunals to decide cases in a more consistent and coherent manner leading to greater certainty for both states and investors, and that affording due deference to host states in the determination of liability would address the concern that the decisions of investment tribunals unjustifiably impact on the regulatory autonomy of states</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Investments, Foreign (International law)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">International commercial arbitration</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Proportionality in law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Respect</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druckausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">978-1-107-08790-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druckausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">978-1-107-45817-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316104378</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">URL des Erstveröffentlichers</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-028957629</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316104378</subfield><subfield code="l">BSB01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield><subfield code="q">BSB_PDA_CBO</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316104378</subfield><subfield code="l">UBG01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield><subfield code="q">UBG_PDA_CBO</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV043542183 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T07:28:24Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9781107087903 9781316104378 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-028957629 |
| oclc_num | 949926225 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG |
| owner_facet | DE-12 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG |
| physical | 1 online resource (266 pages) |
| psigel | ZDB-20-CBO ZDB-20-CBO BSB_PDA_CBO ZDB-20-CBO UBG_PDA_CBO |
| publishDate | 2015 |
| publishDateSearch | 2015 |
| publishDateSort | 2015 |
| publisher | Cambridge University Press |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law |
| spelling | Henckels, Caroline Verfasser aut Proportionality and Deference in Investor-State Arbitration Balancing Investment Protection and Regulatory Autonomy Caroline Henckels Proportionality & Deference in Investor-State Arbitration Cambridge Cambridge University Press 2015 1 online resource (266 pages) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law no. 122 Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 12 Feb 2016) In this study, Caroline Henckels examines how investment tribunals have balanced the competing interests of host states and foreign investors in determining state liability in disputes concerning the exercise of public power. Analyzing the concepts of proportionality and deference in investment tribunals' decision-making in comparative perspective, the book proposes a new methodology for investment tribunals to adopt in regulatory disputes, which combines proportionality analysis with an institutionally sensitive approach to the standard of review. Henckels argues that adopting a modified form of proportionality analysis would provide a means for tribunals to decide cases in a more consistent and coherent manner leading to greater certainty for both states and investors, and that affording due deference to host states in the determination of liability would address the concern that the decisions of investment tribunals unjustifiably impact on the regulatory autonomy of states Investments, Foreign (International law) International commercial arbitration Proportionality in law Respect Erscheint auch als Druckausgabe 978-1-107-08790-3 Erscheint auch als Druckausgabe 978-1-107-45817-8 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316104378 Verlag URL des Erstveröffentlichers Volltext |
| spellingShingle | Henckels, Caroline Proportionality and Deference in Investor-State Arbitration Balancing Investment Protection and Regulatory Autonomy Investments, Foreign (International law) International commercial arbitration Proportionality in law Respect |
| title | Proportionality and Deference in Investor-State Arbitration Balancing Investment Protection and Regulatory Autonomy |
| title_alt | Proportionality & Deference in Investor-State Arbitration |
| title_auth | Proportionality and Deference in Investor-State Arbitration Balancing Investment Protection and Regulatory Autonomy |
| title_exact_search | Proportionality and Deference in Investor-State Arbitration Balancing Investment Protection and Regulatory Autonomy |
| title_full | Proportionality and Deference in Investor-State Arbitration Balancing Investment Protection and Regulatory Autonomy Caroline Henckels |
| title_fullStr | Proportionality and Deference in Investor-State Arbitration Balancing Investment Protection and Regulatory Autonomy Caroline Henckels |
| title_full_unstemmed | Proportionality and Deference in Investor-State Arbitration Balancing Investment Protection and Regulatory Autonomy Caroline Henckels |
| title_short | Proportionality and Deference in Investor-State Arbitration |
| title_sort | proportionality and deference in investor state arbitration balancing investment protection and regulatory autonomy |
| title_sub | Balancing Investment Protection and Regulatory Autonomy |
| topic | Investments, Foreign (International law) International commercial arbitration Proportionality in law Respect |
| topic_facet | Investments, Foreign (International law) International commercial arbitration Proportionality in law Respect |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316104378 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT henckelscaroline proportionalityanddeferenceininvestorstatearbitrationbalancinginvestmentprotectionandregulatoryautonomy AT henckelscaroline proportionalitydeferenceininvestorstatearbitration |