Best practices in assessment of research and development organizations: summary of a workshop
Gespeichert in:
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
|---|---|
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Washington, D.C.
National Academies Press
©2012
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Beschreibung: | Title from PDF title page (viewed Feb. 7, 2013) Includes bibliographical references Introduction -- Summary of presentations -- Key questions identified by discussion groups -- [Appendixes] "The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)--recognizing that information and insights gained through continual examination of practices for organizational assessment are useful for decision makers at organizations across the deferral, industrial, academic, and national laboratory sectors--recently requested that the National Research Council (NRC) organize a panel to review best practices in assessment of research and development (R & D) organizations. In response, the NRC established the Panel for Review of Best Practices in Assessment of Research and Development Organizations. The panel was charged to consider means of assessing the following in a manner that satisfies the requirements of NIST to perform effective assessments but also identifies assessment methods that can be applied selectively to other R & D organizations. These methods include: technical merit and quality of the science and engineering work, the adequacy of the resources available to support high-quality work, the effectiveness of the agency's delivery of the services and products required to fulfill its goals, the degree to which the agency's current and planned R & D portfolio supports its mission, as well as the agency's flexibility to respond to changing economic, political, social and technological contexts. As one means of data gathering, among others that the panel is performing toward development of a final report of its findings, the panel organized a planning committee for a workshop on best practices in assessment of R & D organizations. Best Practices in Assessment of Research and Development Organizations: Summary of a Workshop reviews the workshop conducted at the Keck Center of the National Academies in Washington, D.C., on March 19, 2012"--Publisher's description |
| Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (ix, 41 pages) |
| ISBN: | 9780309266178 0309266173 0309266165 9780309266161 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV043139339 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 151126s2012 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9780309266178 |9 978-0-309-26617-8 | ||
| 020 | |a 0309266173 |9 0-309-26617-3 | ||
| 020 | |a 0309266165 |9 0-309-26616-5 | ||
| 020 | |a 9780309266161 |9 978-0-309-26616-1 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)816364345 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV043139339 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 082 | 0 | |a 507.2/071 |2 23 | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Best practices in assessment of research and development organizations |b summary of a workshop |c James P. McGee, rapporteur ; Laboratory Assessments Board ; Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences ; National Research Council of the National Academies |
| 264 | 1 | |a Washington, D.C. |b National Academies Press |c ©2012 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (ix, 41 pages) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Title from PDF title page (viewed Feb. 7, 2013) | ||
| 500 | |a Includes bibliographical references | ||
| 500 | |a Introduction -- Summary of presentations -- Key questions identified by discussion groups -- [Appendixes] | ||
| 500 | |a "The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)--recognizing that information and insights gained through continual examination of practices for organizational assessment are useful for decision makers at organizations across the deferral, industrial, academic, and national laboratory sectors--recently requested that the National Research Council (NRC) organize a panel to review best practices in assessment of research and development (R & D) organizations. In response, the NRC established the Panel for Review of Best Practices in Assessment of Research and Development Organizations. The panel was charged to consider means of assessing the following in a manner that satisfies the requirements of NIST to perform effective assessments but also identifies assessment methods that can be applied selectively to other R & D organizations. These methods include: technical merit and quality of the science and engineering work, the adequacy of the resources available to support high-quality work, the effectiveness of the agency's delivery of the services and products required to fulfill its goals, the degree to which the agency's current and planned R & D portfolio supports its mission, as well as the agency's flexibility to respond to changing economic, political, social and technological contexts. As one means of data gathering, among others that the panel is performing toward development of a final report of its findings, the panel organized a planning committee for a workshop on best practices in assessment of R & D organizations. Best Practices in Assessment of Research and Development Organizations: Summary of a Workshop reviews the workshop conducted at the Keck Center of the National Academies in Washington, D.C., on March 19, 2012"--Publisher's description | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a SCIENCE / Study & Teaching |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Research |z United States |x Management |x Evaluation |v Congresses | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Research |z United States |x Evaluation |v Congresses | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Associations, institutions, etc |x Research |x Evaluation |v Congresses | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Technological innovations |x Research |z United States |v Congresses | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Research |x Management |x Evaluation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Research |x Evaluation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Associations, institutions, etc |x Research |x Evaluation | |
| 651 | 4 | |a USA | |
| 655 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)1071861417 |a Konferenzschrift |2 gnd-content | |
| 700 | 1 | |a McGee, James P. |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
| 710 | 2 | |a National Research Council (U.S.) |b Laboratory Assessments Board |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
| 710 | 2 | |a National Institute of Standards and Technology (U.S.) |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=867569 |x Aggregator |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a ZDB-4-EBA | ||
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-028563530 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804175586830057472 |
|---|---|
| any_adam_object | |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV043139339 |
| collection | ZDB-4-EBA |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)816364345 (DE-599)BVBBV043139339 |
| dewey-full | 507.2/071 |
| dewey-hundreds | 500 - Natural sciences and mathematics |
| dewey-ones | 507 - Education, research, related topics |
| dewey-raw | 507.2/071 |
| dewey-search | 507.2/071 |
| dewey-sort | 3507.2 271 |
| dewey-tens | 500 - Natural sciences and mathematics |
| discipline | Allgemeine Naturwissenschaft |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>04074nmm a2200505zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV043139339</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">151126s2012 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780309266178</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-309-26617-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">0309266173</subfield><subfield code="9">0-309-26617-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">0309266165</subfield><subfield code="9">0-309-26616-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780309266161</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-309-26616-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)816364345</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV043139339</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">507.2/071</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Best practices in assessment of research and development organizations</subfield><subfield code="b">summary of a workshop</subfield><subfield code="c">James P. McGee, rapporteur ; Laboratory Assessments Board ; Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences ; National Research Council of the National Academies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Washington, D.C.</subfield><subfield code="b">National Academies Press</subfield><subfield code="c">©2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (ix, 41 pages)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Title from PDF title page (viewed Feb. 7, 2013)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Introduction -- Summary of presentations -- Key questions identified by discussion groups -- [Appendixes]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)--recognizing that information and insights gained through continual examination of practices for organizational assessment are useful for decision makers at organizations across the deferral, industrial, academic, and national laboratory sectors--recently requested that the National Research Council (NRC) organize a panel to review best practices in assessment of research and development (R & D) organizations. In response, the NRC established the Panel for Review of Best Practices in Assessment of Research and Development Organizations. The panel was charged to consider means of assessing the following in a manner that satisfies the requirements of NIST to perform effective assessments but also identifies assessment methods that can be applied selectively to other R & D organizations. These methods include: technical merit and quality of the science and engineering work, the adequacy of the resources available to support high-quality work, the effectiveness of the agency's delivery of the services and products required to fulfill its goals, the degree to which the agency's current and planned R & D portfolio supports its mission, as well as the agency's flexibility to respond to changing economic, political, social and technological contexts. As one means of data gathering, among others that the panel is performing toward development of a final report of its findings, the panel organized a planning committee for a workshop on best practices in assessment of R & D organizations. Best Practices in Assessment of Research and Development Organizations: Summary of a Workshop reviews the workshop conducted at the Keck Center of the National Academies in Washington, D.C., on March 19, 2012"--Publisher's description</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">SCIENCE / Study & Teaching</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Research</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield><subfield code="x">Management</subfield><subfield code="x">Evaluation</subfield><subfield code="v">Congresses</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Research</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield><subfield code="x">Evaluation</subfield><subfield code="v">Congresses</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Associations, institutions, etc</subfield><subfield code="x">Research</subfield><subfield code="x">Evaluation</subfield><subfield code="v">Congresses</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Technological innovations</subfield><subfield code="x">Research</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield><subfield code="v">Congresses</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Research</subfield><subfield code="x">Management</subfield><subfield code="x">Evaluation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Research</subfield><subfield code="x">Evaluation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Associations, institutions, etc</subfield><subfield code="x">Research</subfield><subfield code="x">Evaluation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1071861417</subfield><subfield code="a">Konferenzschrift</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd-content</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">McGee, James P.</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">National Research Council (U.S.)</subfield><subfield code="b">Laboratory Assessments Board</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">National Institute of Standards and Technology (U.S.)</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=867569</subfield><subfield code="x">Aggregator</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-028563530</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| genre | (DE-588)1071861417 Konferenzschrift gnd-content |
| genre_facet | Konferenzschrift |
| geographic | USA |
| geographic_facet | USA |
| id | DE-604.BV043139339 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T07:18:39Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9780309266178 0309266173 0309266165 9780309266161 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-028563530 |
| oclc_num | 816364345 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource (ix, 41 pages) |
| psigel | ZDB-4-EBA |
| publishDate | 2012 |
| publishDateSearch | 2012 |
| publishDateSort | 2012 |
| publisher | National Academies Press |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Best practices in assessment of research and development organizations summary of a workshop James P. McGee, rapporteur ; Laboratory Assessments Board ; Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences ; National Research Council of the National Academies Washington, D.C. National Academies Press ©2012 1 Online-Ressource (ix, 41 pages) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Title from PDF title page (viewed Feb. 7, 2013) Includes bibliographical references Introduction -- Summary of presentations -- Key questions identified by discussion groups -- [Appendixes] "The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)--recognizing that information and insights gained through continual examination of practices for organizational assessment are useful for decision makers at organizations across the deferral, industrial, academic, and national laboratory sectors--recently requested that the National Research Council (NRC) organize a panel to review best practices in assessment of research and development (R & D) organizations. In response, the NRC established the Panel for Review of Best Practices in Assessment of Research and Development Organizations. The panel was charged to consider means of assessing the following in a manner that satisfies the requirements of NIST to perform effective assessments but also identifies assessment methods that can be applied selectively to other R & D organizations. These methods include: technical merit and quality of the science and engineering work, the adequacy of the resources available to support high-quality work, the effectiveness of the agency's delivery of the services and products required to fulfill its goals, the degree to which the agency's current and planned R & D portfolio supports its mission, as well as the agency's flexibility to respond to changing economic, political, social and technological contexts. As one means of data gathering, among others that the panel is performing toward development of a final report of its findings, the panel organized a planning committee for a workshop on best practices in assessment of R & D organizations. Best Practices in Assessment of Research and Development Organizations: Summary of a Workshop reviews the workshop conducted at the Keck Center of the National Academies in Washington, D.C., on March 19, 2012"--Publisher's description SCIENCE / Study & Teaching bisacsh Research United States Management Evaluation Congresses Research United States Evaluation Congresses Associations, institutions, etc Research Evaluation Congresses Technological innovations Research United States Congresses Research Management Evaluation Research Evaluation Associations, institutions, etc Research Evaluation USA (DE-588)1071861417 Konferenzschrift gnd-content McGee, James P. Sonstige oth National Research Council (U.S.) Laboratory Assessments Board Sonstige oth National Institute of Standards and Technology (U.S.) Sonstige oth http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=867569 Aggregator Volltext |
| spellingShingle | Best practices in assessment of research and development organizations summary of a workshop SCIENCE / Study & Teaching bisacsh Research United States Management Evaluation Congresses Research United States Evaluation Congresses Associations, institutions, etc Research Evaluation Congresses Technological innovations Research United States Congresses Research Management Evaluation Research Evaluation Associations, institutions, etc Research Evaluation |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)1071861417 |
| title | Best practices in assessment of research and development organizations summary of a workshop |
| title_auth | Best practices in assessment of research and development organizations summary of a workshop |
| title_exact_search | Best practices in assessment of research and development organizations summary of a workshop |
| title_full | Best practices in assessment of research and development organizations summary of a workshop James P. McGee, rapporteur ; Laboratory Assessments Board ; Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences ; National Research Council of the National Academies |
| title_fullStr | Best practices in assessment of research and development organizations summary of a workshop James P. McGee, rapporteur ; Laboratory Assessments Board ; Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences ; National Research Council of the National Academies |
| title_full_unstemmed | Best practices in assessment of research and development organizations summary of a workshop James P. McGee, rapporteur ; Laboratory Assessments Board ; Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences ; National Research Council of the National Academies |
| title_short | Best practices in assessment of research and development organizations |
| title_sort | best practices in assessment of research and development organizations summary of a workshop |
| title_sub | summary of a workshop |
| topic | SCIENCE / Study & Teaching bisacsh Research United States Management Evaluation Congresses Research United States Evaluation Congresses Associations, institutions, etc Research Evaluation Congresses Technological innovations Research United States Congresses Research Management Evaluation Research Evaluation Associations, institutions, etc Research Evaluation |
| topic_facet | SCIENCE / Study & Teaching Research United States Management Evaluation Congresses Research United States Evaluation Congresses Associations, institutions, etc Research Evaluation Congresses Technological innovations Research United States Congresses Research Management Evaluation Research Evaluation Associations, institutions, etc Research Evaluation USA Konferenzschrift |
| url | http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=867569 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mcgeejamesp bestpracticesinassessmentofresearchanddevelopmentorganizationssummaryofaworkshop AT nationalresearchcounciluslaboratoryassessmentsboard bestpracticesinassessmentofresearchanddevelopmentorganizationssummaryofaworkshop AT nationalinstituteofstandardsandtechnologyus bestpracticesinassessmentofresearchanddevelopmentorganizationssummaryofaworkshop |