Finding what works in health care: standards for systematic reviews
Gespeichert in:
| Körperschaft: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Washington, D.C.
National Academies Press
c2011
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | FAW01 FAW02 Volltext |
| Beschreibung: | Includes bibliographical references Standards for initiating a systematic review -- - Standards for finding and assessing individual studies -- - Standards for synthesizing the body of evidence -- - Standards for reporting systematic reviews -- - Improving the quality of systematic reviews Healthcare decision makers in search of reliable information comparing health interventions increasingly turn to systematic reviews for the best summary of the evidence. Systematic reviews identify, select, assess, and synthesize the findings of similar but separate studies, and can help clarify what is known and not known about the potential benefits and harms of drugs, devices, and other healthcare services. Systematic reviews can be helpful for clinicians who want to integrate research findings into their daily practices, for patients to make well-informed choices about their own care, for professional medical societies and other organizations that develop clinical practice guidelines. Too often systematic reviews are of uncertain or poor quality. There are no universally accepted standards for developing systematic reviews leading to variability in how conflicts of interest and biases are handled, how evidence is appraised, and the overall scientific rigor of the process. In Finding What Works in Health Care the Institute of Medicine (IOM) recommends 21 standards for developing high-quality systematic reviews of comparative effectiveness research. The standards address the entire systematic review process from the initial steps of formulating the topic and building the review team to producing a detailed final report that synthesizes what the evidence shows and where knowledge gaps remain. Finding What Works in Health Care also proposes a framework for improving the quality of the science underpinning systematic reviews. This book will serve as a vital resource for both sponsors and producers of systematic reviews of comparative effectiveness research |
| Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (xxii, 317 pages) |
| ISBN: | 0309164265 0309210534 1283151758 9780309164269 9780309210539 9781283151757 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV043095450 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 151126s2011 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 0309164265 |c electronic bk. |9 0-309-16426-5 | ||
| 020 | |a 0309210534 |9 0-309-21053-4 | ||
| 020 | |a 1283151758 |9 1-283-15175-8 | ||
| 020 | |a 9780309164269 |c electronic bk. |9 978-0-309-16426-9 | ||
| 020 | |a 9780309210539 |9 978-0-309-21053-9 | ||
| 020 | |a 9781283151757 |9 978-1-283-15175-7 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)744350480 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV043095450 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-1046 |a DE-1047 | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 610.28/9 |2 23 | |
| 084 | |a XF 3500 |0 (DE-625)152766: |2 rvk | ||
| 110 | 2 | |a Institute of Medicine (U.S.) |b Committee on Standards for Systematic Reviews of Comparative Effectiveness Research |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Finding what works in health care |b standards for systematic reviews |c Committee on Standards for Systematic Reviews of Comparative Effectiveness Research, Board on Health Care Services, Institute of Medicine of the National Academies ; Jill Eden, Laura Levit, Alfred Berg, and Sally Morton, editors |
| 264 | 1 | |a Washington, D.C. |b National Academies Press |c c2011 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (xxii, 317 pages) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Includes bibliographical references | ||
| 500 | |a Standards for initiating a systematic review -- - Standards for finding and assessing individual studies -- - Standards for synthesizing the body of evidence -- - Standards for reporting systematic reviews -- - Improving the quality of systematic reviews | ||
| 500 | |a Healthcare decision makers in search of reliable information comparing health interventions increasingly turn to systematic reviews for the best summary of the evidence. Systematic reviews identify, select, assess, and synthesize the findings of similar but separate studies, and can help clarify what is known and not known about the potential benefits and harms of drugs, devices, and other healthcare services. Systematic reviews can be helpful for clinicians who want to integrate research findings into their daily practices, for patients to make well-informed choices about their own care, for professional medical societies and other organizations that develop clinical practice guidelines. Too often systematic reviews are of uncertain or poor quality. There are no universally accepted standards for developing systematic reviews leading to variability in how conflicts of interest and biases are handled, how evidence is appraised, and the overall scientific rigor of the process. In Finding What Works in Health Care the Institute of Medicine (IOM) recommends 21 standards for developing high-quality systematic reviews of comparative effectiveness research. The standards address the entire systematic review process from the initial steps of formulating the topic and building the review team to producing a detailed final report that synthesizes what the evidence shows and where knowledge gaps remain. Finding What Works in Health Care also proposes a framework for improving the quality of the science underpinning systematic reviews. This book will serve as a vital resource for both sponsors and producers of systematic reviews of comparative effectiveness research | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING / Biomedical |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a MEDICAL / Family & General Practice |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a MEDICAL / Allied Health Services / Medical Technology |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a MEDICAL / Biotechnology |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a MEDICAL / Lasers in Medicine |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Medical care / Quality control |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Medical care / Standards |2 fast | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Comparative Effectiveness Research / standards / United States | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care) / United States | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Medizin | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Medical care |x Standards |z United States | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Medical care |z United States |x Quality control | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Methodologie |0 (DE-588)4139716-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Gesundheitswesen |0 (DE-588)4020775-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Evidenz-basierte Medizin |0 (DE-588)4543414-1 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Metaanalyse |0 (DE-588)4169552-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 4 | |a USA | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Gesundheitswesen |0 (DE-588)4020775-4 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Metaanalyse |0 (DE-588)4169552-5 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Methodologie |0 (DE-588)4139716-2 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |8 1\p |5 DE-604 | |
| 689 | 1 | 0 | |a Evidenz-basierte Medizin |0 (DE-588)4543414-1 |D s |
| 689 | 1 | 1 | |a Methodologie |0 (DE-588)4139716-2 |D s |
| 689 | 1 | |8 2\p |5 DE-604 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Eden, Jill |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Levit, Laura A. |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Berg, Alfred O. |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Morton, Sally C. |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe, Paperback |z 0-309-16425-7 |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe, Paperback |z 978-0-309-16425-2 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=375277 |x Aggregator |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a ZDB-4-EBA | ||
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-028519642 | ||
| 883 | 1 | |8 1\p |a cgwrk |d 20201028 |q DE-101 |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk | |
| 883 | 1 | |8 2\p |a cgwrk |d 20201028 |q DE-101 |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk | |
| 966 | e | |u http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=375277 |l FAW01 |p ZDB-4-EBA |q FAW_PDA_EBA |x Aggregator |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=375277 |l FAW02 |p ZDB-4-EBA |q FAW_PDA_EBA |x Aggregator |3 Volltext | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804175500211388416 |
|---|---|
| any_adam_object | |
| author_corporate | Institute of Medicine (U.S.) Committee on Standards for Systematic Reviews of Comparative Effectiveness Research |
| author_corporate_role | aut |
| author_facet | Institute of Medicine (U.S.) Committee on Standards for Systematic Reviews of Comparative Effectiveness Research |
| author_sort | Institute of Medicine (U.S.) Committee on Standards for Systematic Reviews of Comparative Effectiveness Research |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV043095450 |
| classification_rvk | XF 3500 |
| collection | ZDB-4-EBA |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)744350480 (DE-599)BVBBV043095450 |
| dewey-full | 610.28/9 |
| dewey-hundreds | 600 - Technology (Applied sciences) |
| dewey-ones | 610 - Medicine and health |
| dewey-raw | 610.28/9 |
| dewey-search | 610.28/9 |
| dewey-sort | 3610.28 19 |
| dewey-tens | 610 - Medicine and health |
| discipline | Medizin |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>05762nmm a2200805zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV043095450</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">151126s2011 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">0309164265</subfield><subfield code="c">electronic bk.</subfield><subfield code="9">0-309-16426-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">0309210534</subfield><subfield code="9">0-309-21053-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1283151758</subfield><subfield code="9">1-283-15175-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780309164269</subfield><subfield code="c">electronic bk.</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-309-16426-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780309210539</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-309-21053-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781283151757</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-283-15175-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)744350480</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV043095450</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-1046</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1047</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">610.28/9</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">XF 3500</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)152766:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="110" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Institute of Medicine (U.S.)</subfield><subfield code="b">Committee on Standards for Systematic Reviews of Comparative Effectiveness Research</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Finding what works in health care</subfield><subfield code="b">standards for systematic reviews</subfield><subfield code="c">Committee on Standards for Systematic Reviews of Comparative Effectiveness Research, Board on Health Care Services, Institute of Medicine of the National Academies ; Jill Eden, Laura Levit, Alfred Berg, and Sally Morton, editors</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Washington, D.C.</subfield><subfield code="b">National Academies Press</subfield><subfield code="c">c2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (xxii, 317 pages)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Standards for initiating a systematic review -- - Standards for finding and assessing individual studies -- - Standards for synthesizing the body of evidence -- - Standards for reporting systematic reviews -- - Improving the quality of systematic reviews</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Healthcare decision makers in search of reliable information comparing health interventions increasingly turn to systematic reviews for the best summary of the evidence. Systematic reviews identify, select, assess, and synthesize the findings of similar but separate studies, and can help clarify what is known and not known about the potential benefits and harms of drugs, devices, and other healthcare services. Systematic reviews can be helpful for clinicians who want to integrate research findings into their daily practices, for patients to make well-informed choices about their own care, for professional medical societies and other organizations that develop clinical practice guidelines. Too often systematic reviews are of uncertain or poor quality. There are no universally accepted standards for developing systematic reviews leading to variability in how conflicts of interest and biases are handled, how evidence is appraised, and the overall scientific rigor of the process. In Finding What Works in Health Care the Institute of Medicine (IOM) recommends 21 standards for developing high-quality systematic reviews of comparative effectiveness research. The standards address the entire systematic review process from the initial steps of formulating the topic and building the review team to producing a detailed final report that synthesizes what the evidence shows and where knowledge gaps remain. Finding What Works in Health Care also proposes a framework for improving the quality of the science underpinning systematic reviews. This book will serve as a vital resource for both sponsors and producers of systematic reviews of comparative effectiveness research</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING / Biomedical</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">MEDICAL / Family & General Practice</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">MEDICAL / Allied Health Services / Medical Technology</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">MEDICAL / Biotechnology</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">MEDICAL / Lasers in Medicine</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Medical care / Quality control</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Medical care / Standards</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Comparative Effectiveness Research / standards / United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care) / United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Medizin</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Medical care</subfield><subfield code="x">Standards</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Medical care</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield><subfield code="x">Quality control</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Methodologie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4139716-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Gesundheitswesen</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4020775-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Evidenz-basierte Medizin</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4543414-1</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Metaanalyse</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4169552-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Gesundheitswesen</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4020775-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Metaanalyse</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4169552-5</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Methodologie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4139716-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Evidenz-basierte Medizin</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4543414-1</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Methodologie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4139716-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">2\p</subfield><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Eden, Jill</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Levit, Laura A.</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Berg, Alfred O.</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Morton, Sally C.</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe, Paperback</subfield><subfield code="z">0-309-16425-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe, Paperback</subfield><subfield code="z">978-0-309-16425-2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=375277</subfield><subfield code="x">Aggregator</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-028519642</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="883" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="a">cgwrk</subfield><subfield code="d">20201028</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-101</subfield><subfield code="u">https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="883" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">2\p</subfield><subfield code="a">cgwrk</subfield><subfield code="d">20201028</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-101</subfield><subfield code="u">https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=375277</subfield><subfield code="l">FAW01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield><subfield code="q">FAW_PDA_EBA</subfield><subfield code="x">Aggregator</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=375277</subfield><subfield code="l">FAW02</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield><subfield code="q">FAW_PDA_EBA</subfield><subfield code="x">Aggregator</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | USA |
| geographic_facet | USA |
| id | DE-604.BV043095450 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T07:17:16Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 0309164265 0309210534 1283151758 9780309164269 9780309210539 9781283151757 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-028519642 |
| oclc_num | 744350480 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-1046 DE-1047 |
| owner_facet | DE-1046 DE-1047 |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource (xxii, 317 pages) |
| psigel | ZDB-4-EBA ZDB-4-EBA FAW_PDA_EBA |
| publishDate | 2011 |
| publishDateSearch | 2011 |
| publishDateSort | 2011 |
| publisher | National Academies Press |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Institute of Medicine (U.S.) Committee on Standards for Systematic Reviews of Comparative Effectiveness Research Verfasser aut Finding what works in health care standards for systematic reviews Committee on Standards for Systematic Reviews of Comparative Effectiveness Research, Board on Health Care Services, Institute of Medicine of the National Academies ; Jill Eden, Laura Levit, Alfred Berg, and Sally Morton, editors Washington, D.C. National Academies Press c2011 1 Online-Ressource (xxii, 317 pages) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Includes bibliographical references Standards for initiating a systematic review -- - Standards for finding and assessing individual studies -- - Standards for synthesizing the body of evidence -- - Standards for reporting systematic reviews -- - Improving the quality of systematic reviews Healthcare decision makers in search of reliable information comparing health interventions increasingly turn to systematic reviews for the best summary of the evidence. Systematic reviews identify, select, assess, and synthesize the findings of similar but separate studies, and can help clarify what is known and not known about the potential benefits and harms of drugs, devices, and other healthcare services. Systematic reviews can be helpful for clinicians who want to integrate research findings into their daily practices, for patients to make well-informed choices about their own care, for professional medical societies and other organizations that develop clinical practice guidelines. Too often systematic reviews are of uncertain or poor quality. There are no universally accepted standards for developing systematic reviews leading to variability in how conflicts of interest and biases are handled, how evidence is appraised, and the overall scientific rigor of the process. In Finding What Works in Health Care the Institute of Medicine (IOM) recommends 21 standards for developing high-quality systematic reviews of comparative effectiveness research. The standards address the entire systematic review process from the initial steps of formulating the topic and building the review team to producing a detailed final report that synthesizes what the evidence shows and where knowledge gaps remain. Finding What Works in Health Care also proposes a framework for improving the quality of the science underpinning systematic reviews. This book will serve as a vital resource for both sponsors and producers of systematic reviews of comparative effectiveness research TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING / Biomedical bisacsh MEDICAL / Family & General Practice bisacsh MEDICAL / Allied Health Services / Medical Technology bisacsh MEDICAL / Biotechnology bisacsh MEDICAL / Lasers in Medicine bisacsh Medical care / Quality control fast Medical care / Standards fast Comparative Effectiveness Research / standards / United States Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care) / United States Medizin Medical care Standards United States Medical care United States Quality control Methodologie (DE-588)4139716-2 gnd rswk-swf Gesundheitswesen (DE-588)4020775-4 gnd rswk-swf Evidenz-basierte Medizin (DE-588)4543414-1 gnd rswk-swf Metaanalyse (DE-588)4169552-5 gnd rswk-swf USA Gesundheitswesen (DE-588)4020775-4 s Metaanalyse (DE-588)4169552-5 s Methodologie (DE-588)4139716-2 s 1\p DE-604 Evidenz-basierte Medizin (DE-588)4543414-1 s 2\p DE-604 Eden, Jill Sonstige oth Levit, Laura A. Sonstige oth Berg, Alfred O. Sonstige oth Morton, Sally C. Sonstige oth Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe, Paperback 0-309-16425-7 Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe, Paperback 978-0-309-16425-2 http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=375277 Aggregator Volltext 1\p cgwrk 20201028 DE-101 https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk 2\p cgwrk 20201028 DE-101 https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk |
| spellingShingle | Finding what works in health care standards for systematic reviews TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING / Biomedical bisacsh MEDICAL / Family & General Practice bisacsh MEDICAL / Allied Health Services / Medical Technology bisacsh MEDICAL / Biotechnology bisacsh MEDICAL / Lasers in Medicine bisacsh Medical care / Quality control fast Medical care / Standards fast Comparative Effectiveness Research / standards / United States Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care) / United States Medizin Medical care Standards United States Medical care United States Quality control Methodologie (DE-588)4139716-2 gnd Gesundheitswesen (DE-588)4020775-4 gnd Evidenz-basierte Medizin (DE-588)4543414-1 gnd Metaanalyse (DE-588)4169552-5 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4139716-2 (DE-588)4020775-4 (DE-588)4543414-1 (DE-588)4169552-5 |
| title | Finding what works in health care standards for systematic reviews |
| title_auth | Finding what works in health care standards for systematic reviews |
| title_exact_search | Finding what works in health care standards for systematic reviews |
| title_full | Finding what works in health care standards for systematic reviews Committee on Standards for Systematic Reviews of Comparative Effectiveness Research, Board on Health Care Services, Institute of Medicine of the National Academies ; Jill Eden, Laura Levit, Alfred Berg, and Sally Morton, editors |
| title_fullStr | Finding what works in health care standards for systematic reviews Committee on Standards for Systematic Reviews of Comparative Effectiveness Research, Board on Health Care Services, Institute of Medicine of the National Academies ; Jill Eden, Laura Levit, Alfred Berg, and Sally Morton, editors |
| title_full_unstemmed | Finding what works in health care standards for systematic reviews Committee on Standards for Systematic Reviews of Comparative Effectiveness Research, Board on Health Care Services, Institute of Medicine of the National Academies ; Jill Eden, Laura Levit, Alfred Berg, and Sally Morton, editors |
| title_short | Finding what works in health care |
| title_sort | finding what works in health care standards for systematic reviews |
| title_sub | standards for systematic reviews |
| topic | TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING / Biomedical bisacsh MEDICAL / Family & General Practice bisacsh MEDICAL / Allied Health Services / Medical Technology bisacsh MEDICAL / Biotechnology bisacsh MEDICAL / Lasers in Medicine bisacsh Medical care / Quality control fast Medical care / Standards fast Comparative Effectiveness Research / standards / United States Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care) / United States Medizin Medical care Standards United States Medical care United States Quality control Methodologie (DE-588)4139716-2 gnd Gesundheitswesen (DE-588)4020775-4 gnd Evidenz-basierte Medizin (DE-588)4543414-1 gnd Metaanalyse (DE-588)4169552-5 gnd |
| topic_facet | TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING / Biomedical MEDICAL / Family & General Practice MEDICAL / Allied Health Services / Medical Technology MEDICAL / Biotechnology MEDICAL / Lasers in Medicine Medical care / Quality control Medical care / Standards Comparative Effectiveness Research / standards / United States Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care) / United States Medizin Medical care Standards United States Medical care United States Quality control Methodologie Gesundheitswesen Evidenz-basierte Medizin Metaanalyse USA |
| url | http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=375277 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT instituteofmedicineuscommitteeonstandardsforsystematicreviewsofcomparativeeffectivenessresearch findingwhatworksinhealthcarestandardsforsystematicreviews AT edenjill findingwhatworksinhealthcarestandardsforsystematicreviews AT levitlauraa findingwhatworksinhealthcarestandardsforsystematicreviews AT bergalfredo findingwhatworksinhealthcarestandardsforsystematicreviews AT mortonsallyc findingwhatworksinhealthcarestandardsforsystematicreviews |