Is rational choice theory all of social science?:
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Ann Arbor
University of Michigan Press
c2003
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | FAW01 FAW02 Volltext |
| Beschreibung: | Master and use copy. Digital master created according to Benchmark for Faithful Digital Reproductions of Monographs and Serials, Version 1. Digital Library Federation, December 2002 Includes bibliographical references (p. 281-311) and index Annotation Advocates of rational choice theory in political science have been perceived by their critics as attempting to establish an intellectual hegemony in contemporary social science, to the detriment of alternative methods of research. The debate has gained a nonacademic audience, hitting the pages of the New York Times and the New Republic. In the academy, the antagonists have expressed their views in books, journal articles, and at professional conferences.Mark I. Lichbach addresses the question of the place of rational choice theory in the social sciences in general and in political science in particular. He presents a typology of the antagonists as either rationalist, culturalist, or structuralist and offers an insightful examination of the debate. He reveals that the rationalist bid for hegemony and synthesis is rooted in the weaknesses, not the strengths, of rationalist thought. He concludes that the various theoretical camps are unlikely to accept the claimed superiority of the rationalist approach but that this opposition is of value in itself to the social sciences, which requires multiple perspectives to remain healthy.With its penetrating examination of the assumptions and basic arguments of each of the sides to this debate, this book cuts through the partisan rhetoric and provides an essential roadmap for the future of the discipline.Mark I. Lichbach is Professor of Government and Politics, University of Maryland |
| Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (xx, 315 p.) |
| ISBN: | 047202485X 9780472024858 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV043091219 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 151126s2003 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 047202485X |c electronic bk. |9 0-472-02485-X | ||
| 020 | |a 9780472024858 |c electronic bk. |9 978-0-472-02485-8 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)587603662 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV043091219 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-1046 |a DE-1047 | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 301/.01 |2 22 | |
| 100 | 1 | |a Lichbach, Mark Irving |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Is rational choice theory all of social science? |c Mark I. Lichbach |
| 264 | 1 | |a Ann Arbor |b University of Michigan Press |c c2003 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (xx, 315 p.) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Master and use copy. Digital master created according to Benchmark for Faithful Digital Reproductions of Monographs and Serials, Version 1. Digital Library Federation, December 2002 | ||
| 500 | |a Includes bibliographical references (p. 281-311) and index | ||
| 500 | |a Annotation Advocates of rational choice theory in political science have been perceived by their critics as attempting to establish an intellectual hegemony in contemporary social science, to the detriment of alternative methods of research. The debate has gained a nonacademic audience, hitting the pages of the New York Times and the New Republic. In the academy, the antagonists have expressed their views in books, journal articles, and at professional conferences.Mark I. Lichbach addresses the question of the place of rational choice theory in the social sciences in general and in political science in particular. He presents a typology of the antagonists as either rationalist, culturalist, or structuralist and offers an insightful examination of the debate. He reveals that the rationalist bid for hegemony and synthesis is rooted in the weaknesses, not the strengths, of rationalist thought. He concludes that the various theoretical camps are unlikely to accept the claimed superiority of the rationalist approach but that this opposition is of value in itself to the social sciences, which requires multiple perspectives to remain healthy.With its penetrating examination of the assumptions and basic arguments of each of the sides to this debate, this book cuts through the partisan rhetoric and provides an essential roadmap for the future of the discipline.Mark I. Lichbach is Professor of Government and Politics, University of Maryland | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Choix rationnels, Théorie des | |
| 650 | 7 | |a SOCIAL SCIENCE / Regional Studies |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a SOCIAL SCIENCE / Anthropology / General |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Rationele keuze |2 gtt | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Social choice |2 gtt | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Politieke wetenschappen |2 gtt | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Sociale wetenschappen |2 gtt | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Rational choice theory |2 fast | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Sozialwissenschaften | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Rational choice theory | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe, Paperback |z 0-472-06819-9 |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe, Hardcover |z 0-472-09819-5 |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe, Paperback |z 978-0-472-06819-7 |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe, Hardcover |z 978-0-472-09819-4 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=310054 |x Aggregator |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a ZDB-4-EBA | ||
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-028515411 | ||
| 966 | e | |u http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=310054 |l FAW01 |p ZDB-4-EBA |q FAW_PDA_EBA |x Aggregator |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=310054 |l FAW02 |p ZDB-4-EBA |q FAW_PDA_EBA |x Aggregator |3 Volltext | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804175492359651328 |
|---|---|
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Lichbach, Mark Irving |
| author_facet | Lichbach, Mark Irving |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Lichbach, Mark Irving |
| author_variant | m i l mi mil |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV043091219 |
| collection | ZDB-4-EBA |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)587603662 (DE-599)BVBBV043091219 |
| dewey-full | 301/.01 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 301 - Sociology and anthropology |
| dewey-raw | 301/.01 |
| dewey-search | 301/.01 |
| dewey-sort | 3301 11 |
| dewey-tens | 300 - Social sciences |
| discipline | Soziologie |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03860nmm a2200529zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV043091219</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">151126s2003 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">047202485X</subfield><subfield code="c">electronic bk.</subfield><subfield code="9">0-472-02485-X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780472024858</subfield><subfield code="c">electronic bk.</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-472-02485-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)587603662</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV043091219</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-1046</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1047</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">301/.01</subfield><subfield code="2">22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lichbach, Mark Irving</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Is rational choice theory all of social science?</subfield><subfield code="c">Mark I. Lichbach</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Ann Arbor</subfield><subfield code="b">University of Michigan Press</subfield><subfield code="c">c2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (xx, 315 p.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Master and use copy. Digital master created according to Benchmark for Faithful Digital Reproductions of Monographs and Serials, Version 1. Digital Library Federation, December 2002</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references (p. 281-311) and index</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Annotation Advocates of rational choice theory in political science have been perceived by their critics as attempting to establish an intellectual hegemony in contemporary social science, to the detriment of alternative methods of research. The debate has gained a nonacademic audience, hitting the pages of the New York Times and the New Republic. In the academy, the antagonists have expressed their views in books, journal articles, and at professional conferences.Mark I. Lichbach addresses the question of the place of rational choice theory in the social sciences in general and in political science in particular. He presents a typology of the antagonists as either rationalist, culturalist, or structuralist and offers an insightful examination of the debate. He reveals that the rationalist bid for hegemony and synthesis is rooted in the weaknesses, not the strengths, of rationalist thought. He concludes that the various theoretical camps are unlikely to accept the claimed superiority of the rationalist approach but that this opposition is of value in itself to the social sciences, which requires multiple perspectives to remain healthy.With its penetrating examination of the assumptions and basic arguments of each of the sides to this debate, this book cuts through the partisan rhetoric and provides an essential roadmap for the future of the discipline.Mark I. Lichbach is Professor of Government and Politics, University of Maryland</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Choix rationnels, Théorie des</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">SOCIAL SCIENCE / Regional Studies</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">SOCIAL SCIENCE / Anthropology / General</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rationele keuze</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Social choice</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Politieke wetenschappen</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Sociale wetenschappen</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rational choice theory</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Sozialwissenschaften</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Rational choice theory</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe, Paperback</subfield><subfield code="z">0-472-06819-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe, Hardcover</subfield><subfield code="z">0-472-09819-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe, Paperback</subfield><subfield code="z">978-0-472-06819-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe, Hardcover</subfield><subfield code="z">978-0-472-09819-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=310054</subfield><subfield code="x">Aggregator</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-028515411</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=310054</subfield><subfield code="l">FAW01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield><subfield code="q">FAW_PDA_EBA</subfield><subfield code="x">Aggregator</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=310054</subfield><subfield code="l">FAW02</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield><subfield code="q">FAW_PDA_EBA</subfield><subfield code="x">Aggregator</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV043091219 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T07:17:09Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 047202485X 9780472024858 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-028515411 |
| oclc_num | 587603662 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-1046 DE-1047 |
| owner_facet | DE-1046 DE-1047 |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource (xx, 315 p.) |
| psigel | ZDB-4-EBA ZDB-4-EBA FAW_PDA_EBA |
| publishDate | 2003 |
| publishDateSearch | 2003 |
| publishDateSort | 2003 |
| publisher | University of Michigan Press |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Lichbach, Mark Irving Verfasser aut Is rational choice theory all of social science? Mark I. Lichbach Ann Arbor University of Michigan Press c2003 1 Online-Ressource (xx, 315 p.) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Master and use copy. Digital master created according to Benchmark for Faithful Digital Reproductions of Monographs and Serials, Version 1. Digital Library Federation, December 2002 Includes bibliographical references (p. 281-311) and index Annotation Advocates of rational choice theory in political science have been perceived by their critics as attempting to establish an intellectual hegemony in contemporary social science, to the detriment of alternative methods of research. The debate has gained a nonacademic audience, hitting the pages of the New York Times and the New Republic. In the academy, the antagonists have expressed their views in books, journal articles, and at professional conferences.Mark I. Lichbach addresses the question of the place of rational choice theory in the social sciences in general and in political science in particular. He presents a typology of the antagonists as either rationalist, culturalist, or structuralist and offers an insightful examination of the debate. He reveals that the rationalist bid for hegemony and synthesis is rooted in the weaknesses, not the strengths, of rationalist thought. He concludes that the various theoretical camps are unlikely to accept the claimed superiority of the rationalist approach but that this opposition is of value in itself to the social sciences, which requires multiple perspectives to remain healthy.With its penetrating examination of the assumptions and basic arguments of each of the sides to this debate, this book cuts through the partisan rhetoric and provides an essential roadmap for the future of the discipline.Mark I. Lichbach is Professor of Government and Politics, University of Maryland Choix rationnels, Théorie des SOCIAL SCIENCE / Regional Studies bisacsh SOCIAL SCIENCE / Anthropology / General bisacsh Rationele keuze gtt Social choice gtt Politieke wetenschappen gtt Sociale wetenschappen gtt Rational choice theory fast Sozialwissenschaften Rational choice theory Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe, Paperback 0-472-06819-9 Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe, Hardcover 0-472-09819-5 Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe, Paperback 978-0-472-06819-7 Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe, Hardcover 978-0-472-09819-4 http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=310054 Aggregator Volltext |
| spellingShingle | Lichbach, Mark Irving Is rational choice theory all of social science? Choix rationnels, Théorie des SOCIAL SCIENCE / Regional Studies bisacsh SOCIAL SCIENCE / Anthropology / General bisacsh Rationele keuze gtt Social choice gtt Politieke wetenschappen gtt Sociale wetenschappen gtt Rational choice theory fast Sozialwissenschaften Rational choice theory |
| title | Is rational choice theory all of social science? |
| title_auth | Is rational choice theory all of social science? |
| title_exact_search | Is rational choice theory all of social science? |
| title_full | Is rational choice theory all of social science? Mark I. Lichbach |
| title_fullStr | Is rational choice theory all of social science? Mark I. Lichbach |
| title_full_unstemmed | Is rational choice theory all of social science? Mark I. Lichbach |
| title_short | Is rational choice theory all of social science? |
| title_sort | is rational choice theory all of social science |
| topic | Choix rationnels, Théorie des SOCIAL SCIENCE / Regional Studies bisacsh SOCIAL SCIENCE / Anthropology / General bisacsh Rationele keuze gtt Social choice gtt Politieke wetenschappen gtt Sociale wetenschappen gtt Rational choice theory fast Sozialwissenschaften Rational choice theory |
| topic_facet | Choix rationnels, Théorie des SOCIAL SCIENCE / Regional Studies SOCIAL SCIENCE / Anthropology / General Rationele keuze Social choice Politieke wetenschappen Sociale wetenschappen Rational choice theory Sozialwissenschaften |
| url | http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=310054 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT lichbachmarkirving isrationalchoicetheoryallofsocialscience |