Aporetics: Rational Deliberation in the Face of Inconsistency
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Pittsburgh
University of Pittsburgh Press
Aug. 2009
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | FAW01 FAW02 Volltext |
| Beschreibung: | Master and use copy. Digital master created according to Benchmark for Faithful Digital Reproductions of Monographs and Serials, Version 1. Digital Library Federation, December 2002 The word apory stems from the Greek aporia, meaning impasse or perplexing difficulty. InAporetics,Nicholas Rescher defines an apory as a group of individually plausible but collectively incompatible theses. Rescher examines historic, formulaic, and systematic apories and couples these with aporetic theory from other authors to form this original and comprehensive survey. Citing thinkers from the pre-Socratics through Spinoza, Hegel, and Nicolai Hartmann, he builds a framework for coping with the complexities of divergent theses, and shows in detail how aporetic analysis can be applied to a variety of fields including philosophy, mathematics, linguistics, logic, and intellectual history.Rescher's in-depth examination reveals how aporetic inconsistency can be managed through a plausibility analysis that breaks the chain of inconsistency at its weakest link by deploying right-of-way precedence based on considerations of cognitive centrality. Thus while involvement with cognitive conflicts and inconsistencies are pervasive in human thought, aporetic analysis can provide an effective means of damage control The nature of apories -- Coherentism : an aporetic approach to empirical inquiry -- Counterfactual conditionals -- Variant analyses of counterfactuals and problems of probability -- The aporetics of counterfactual history -- Paradoxes -- Philosophical aporetics -- The dialectics of philosophical development -- The rationale of aporetic variation Includes bibliographical references (pages 153-157) and index |
| Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (176 p.) |
| ISBN: | 0822973685 9780822960577 9780822973683 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV043055879 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 151126s2009 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 0822973685 |9 0-8229-7368-5 | ||
| 020 | |a 9780822960577 |9 978-0-8229-6057-7 | ||
| 020 | |a 9780822973683 |9 978-0-8229-7368-3 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)810039658 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV043055879 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-1046 |a DE-1047 | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 121 |2 22 | |
| 084 | |a CC 1100 |0 (DE-625)17603: |2 rvk | ||
| 084 | |a CI 6585 |0 (DE-625)18547:11797 |2 rvk | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Rescher, Nicholas |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Aporetics |b Rational Deliberation in the Face of Inconsistency |
| 264 | 1 | |a Pittsburgh |b University of Pittsburgh Press |c Aug. 2009 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (176 p.) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Master and use copy. Digital master created according to Benchmark for Faithful Digital Reproductions of Monographs and Serials, Version 1. Digital Library Federation, December 2002 | ||
| 500 | |a The word apory stems from the Greek aporia, meaning impasse or perplexing difficulty. InAporetics,Nicholas Rescher defines an apory as a group of individually plausible but collectively incompatible theses. Rescher examines historic, formulaic, and systematic apories and couples these with aporetic theory from other authors to form this original and comprehensive survey. Citing thinkers from the pre-Socratics through Spinoza, Hegel, and Nicolai Hartmann, he builds a framework for coping with the complexities of divergent theses, and shows in detail how aporetic analysis can be applied to a variety of fields including philosophy, mathematics, linguistics, logic, and intellectual history.Rescher's in-depth examination reveals how aporetic inconsistency can be managed through a plausibility analysis that breaks the chain of inconsistency at its weakest link by deploying right-of-way precedence based on considerations of cognitive centrality. Thus while involvement with cognitive conflicts and inconsistencies are pervasive in human thought, aporetic analysis can provide an effective means of damage control | ||
| 500 | |a The nature of apories -- Coherentism : an aporetic approach to empirical inquiry -- Counterfactual conditionals -- Variant analyses of counterfactuals and problems of probability -- The aporetics of counterfactual history -- Paradoxes -- Philosophical aporetics -- The dialectics of philosophical development -- The rationale of aporetic variation | ||
| 500 | |a Includes bibliographical references (pages 153-157) and index | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Philosophy | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Aporia |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Rationalität |2 swd | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Aporie |2 swd | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Kontrafaktisches Denken |2 swd | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Aporie |2 gtt | |
| 650 | 7 | |a PHILOSOPHY / Epistemology |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a PHILOSOPHY / General |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Philosophie | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Aporia | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Aporie |0 (DE-588)4135001-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Kontrafaktisches Denken |0 (DE-588)4577003-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Rationalität |0 (DE-588)4048507-9 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Rationalität |0 (DE-588)4048507-9 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Aporie |0 (DE-588)4135001-7 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Kontrafaktisches Denken |0 (DE-588)4577003-7 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |8 1\p |5 DE-604 | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe, Hardcover |z 0-8229-4363-8 |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe, Paperback |z 0-8229-6057-5 |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe, Hardcover |z 978-0-8229-4363-1 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=829217 |x Aggregator |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a ZDB-4-EBA | ||
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-028480071 | ||
| 883 | 1 | |8 1\p |a cgwrk |d 20201028 |q DE-101 |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk | |
| 966 | e | |u http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=829217 |l FAW01 |p ZDB-4-EBA |q FAW_PDA_EBA |x Aggregator |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=829217 |l FAW02 |p ZDB-4-EBA |q FAW_PDA_EBA |x Aggregator |3 Volltext | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804175427472719872 |
|---|---|
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Rescher, Nicholas |
| author_facet | Rescher, Nicholas |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Rescher, Nicholas |
| author_variant | n r nr |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV043055879 |
| classification_rvk | CC 1100 CI 6585 |
| collection | ZDB-4-EBA |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)810039658 (DE-599)BVBBV043055879 |
| dewey-full | 121 |
| dewey-hundreds | 100 - Philosophy & psychology |
| dewey-ones | 121 - Epistemology (Theory of knowledge) |
| dewey-raw | 121 |
| dewey-search | 121 |
| dewey-sort | 3121 |
| dewey-tens | 120 - Epistemology, causation, humankind |
| discipline | Philosophie |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>04270nmm a2200661zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV043055879</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">151126s2009 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">0822973685</subfield><subfield code="9">0-8229-7368-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780822960577</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-8229-6057-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780822973683</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-8229-7368-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)810039658</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV043055879</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-1046</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1047</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">121</subfield><subfield code="2">22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">CC 1100</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)17603:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">CI 6585</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)18547:11797</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rescher, Nicholas</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Aporetics</subfield><subfield code="b">Rational Deliberation in the Face of Inconsistency</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Pittsburgh</subfield><subfield code="b">University of Pittsburgh Press</subfield><subfield code="c">Aug. 2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (176 p.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Master and use copy. Digital master created according to Benchmark for Faithful Digital Reproductions of Monographs and Serials, Version 1. Digital Library Federation, December 2002</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The word apory stems from the Greek aporia, meaning impasse or perplexing difficulty. InAporetics,Nicholas Rescher defines an apory as a group of individually plausible but collectively incompatible theses. Rescher examines historic, formulaic, and systematic apories and couples these with aporetic theory from other authors to form this original and comprehensive survey. Citing thinkers from the pre-Socratics through Spinoza, Hegel, and Nicolai Hartmann, he builds a framework for coping with the complexities of divergent theses, and shows in detail how aporetic analysis can be applied to a variety of fields including philosophy, mathematics, linguistics, logic, and intellectual history.Rescher's in-depth examination reveals how aporetic inconsistency can be managed through a plausibility analysis that breaks the chain of inconsistency at its weakest link by deploying right-of-way precedence based on considerations of cognitive centrality. Thus while involvement with cognitive conflicts and inconsistencies are pervasive in human thought, aporetic analysis can provide an effective means of damage control</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The nature of apories -- Coherentism : an aporetic approach to empirical inquiry -- Counterfactual conditionals -- Variant analyses of counterfactuals and problems of probability -- The aporetics of counterfactual history -- Paradoxes -- Philosophical aporetics -- The dialectics of philosophical development -- The rationale of aporetic variation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references (pages 153-157) and index</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Philosophy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Aporia</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rationalität</subfield><subfield code="2">swd</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Aporie</subfield><subfield code="2">swd</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Kontrafaktisches Denken</subfield><subfield code="2">swd</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Aporie</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">PHILOSOPHY / Epistemology</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">PHILOSOPHY / General</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Philosophie</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Aporia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Aporie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4135001-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Kontrafaktisches Denken</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4577003-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rationalität</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4048507-9</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Rationalität</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4048507-9</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Aporie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4135001-7</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Kontrafaktisches Denken</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4577003-7</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe, Hardcover</subfield><subfield code="z">0-8229-4363-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe, Paperback</subfield><subfield code="z">0-8229-6057-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe, Hardcover</subfield><subfield code="z">978-0-8229-4363-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=829217</subfield><subfield code="x">Aggregator</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-028480071</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="883" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="a">cgwrk</subfield><subfield code="d">20201028</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-101</subfield><subfield code="u">https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=829217</subfield><subfield code="l">FAW01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield><subfield code="q">FAW_PDA_EBA</subfield><subfield code="x">Aggregator</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=829217</subfield><subfield code="l">FAW02</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield><subfield code="q">FAW_PDA_EBA</subfield><subfield code="x">Aggregator</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV043055879 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T07:16:07Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 0822973685 9780822960577 9780822973683 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-028480071 |
| oclc_num | 810039658 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-1046 DE-1047 |
| owner_facet | DE-1046 DE-1047 |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource (176 p.) |
| psigel | ZDB-4-EBA ZDB-4-EBA FAW_PDA_EBA |
| publishDate | 2009 |
| publishDateSearch | 2009 |
| publishDateSort | 2009 |
| publisher | University of Pittsburgh Press |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Rescher, Nicholas Verfasser aut Aporetics Rational Deliberation in the Face of Inconsistency Pittsburgh University of Pittsburgh Press Aug. 2009 1 Online-Ressource (176 p.) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Master and use copy. Digital master created according to Benchmark for Faithful Digital Reproductions of Monographs and Serials, Version 1. Digital Library Federation, December 2002 The word apory stems from the Greek aporia, meaning impasse or perplexing difficulty. InAporetics,Nicholas Rescher defines an apory as a group of individually plausible but collectively incompatible theses. Rescher examines historic, formulaic, and systematic apories and couples these with aporetic theory from other authors to form this original and comprehensive survey. Citing thinkers from the pre-Socratics through Spinoza, Hegel, and Nicolai Hartmann, he builds a framework for coping with the complexities of divergent theses, and shows in detail how aporetic analysis can be applied to a variety of fields including philosophy, mathematics, linguistics, logic, and intellectual history.Rescher's in-depth examination reveals how aporetic inconsistency can be managed through a plausibility analysis that breaks the chain of inconsistency at its weakest link by deploying right-of-way precedence based on considerations of cognitive centrality. Thus while involvement with cognitive conflicts and inconsistencies are pervasive in human thought, aporetic analysis can provide an effective means of damage control The nature of apories -- Coherentism : an aporetic approach to empirical inquiry -- Counterfactual conditionals -- Variant analyses of counterfactuals and problems of probability -- The aporetics of counterfactual history -- Paradoxes -- Philosophical aporetics -- The dialectics of philosophical development -- The rationale of aporetic variation Includes bibliographical references (pages 153-157) and index Philosophy Aporia fast Rationalität swd Aporie swd Kontrafaktisches Denken swd Aporie gtt PHILOSOPHY / Epistemology bisacsh PHILOSOPHY / General bisacsh Philosophie Aporia Aporie (DE-588)4135001-7 gnd rswk-swf Kontrafaktisches Denken (DE-588)4577003-7 gnd rswk-swf Rationalität (DE-588)4048507-9 gnd rswk-swf Rationalität (DE-588)4048507-9 s Aporie (DE-588)4135001-7 s Kontrafaktisches Denken (DE-588)4577003-7 s 1\p DE-604 Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe, Hardcover 0-8229-4363-8 Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe, Paperback 0-8229-6057-5 Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe, Hardcover 978-0-8229-4363-1 http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=829217 Aggregator Volltext 1\p cgwrk 20201028 DE-101 https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk |
| spellingShingle | Rescher, Nicholas Aporetics Rational Deliberation in the Face of Inconsistency Philosophy Aporia fast Rationalität swd Aporie swd Kontrafaktisches Denken swd Aporie gtt PHILOSOPHY / Epistemology bisacsh PHILOSOPHY / General bisacsh Philosophie Aporia Aporie (DE-588)4135001-7 gnd Kontrafaktisches Denken (DE-588)4577003-7 gnd Rationalität (DE-588)4048507-9 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4135001-7 (DE-588)4577003-7 (DE-588)4048507-9 |
| title | Aporetics Rational Deliberation in the Face of Inconsistency |
| title_auth | Aporetics Rational Deliberation in the Face of Inconsistency |
| title_exact_search | Aporetics Rational Deliberation in the Face of Inconsistency |
| title_full | Aporetics Rational Deliberation in the Face of Inconsistency |
| title_fullStr | Aporetics Rational Deliberation in the Face of Inconsistency |
| title_full_unstemmed | Aporetics Rational Deliberation in the Face of Inconsistency |
| title_short | Aporetics |
| title_sort | aporetics rational deliberation in the face of inconsistency |
| title_sub | Rational Deliberation in the Face of Inconsistency |
| topic | Philosophy Aporia fast Rationalität swd Aporie swd Kontrafaktisches Denken swd Aporie gtt PHILOSOPHY / Epistemology bisacsh PHILOSOPHY / General bisacsh Philosophie Aporia Aporie (DE-588)4135001-7 gnd Kontrafaktisches Denken (DE-588)4577003-7 gnd Rationalität (DE-588)4048507-9 gnd |
| topic_facet | Philosophy Aporia Rationalität Aporie Kontrafaktisches Denken PHILOSOPHY / Epistemology PHILOSOPHY / General Philosophie |
| url | http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=829217 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT reschernicholas aporeticsrationaldeliberationinthefaceofinconsistency |