The puzzle of unanimity: consensus on the United States Supreme Court
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Stanford, California
Stanford Law Books
[2013]
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | FAW01 FAW02 Volltext |
| Beschreibung: | Print version record |
| Beschreibung: | 1 online resource (x, 201 pages) |
| ISBN: | 0804784728 0804786321 9780804784726 9780804786324 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV043040123 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 151120s2013 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 0804784728 |9 0-8047-8472-8 | ||
| 020 | |a 0804786321 |9 0-8047-8632-1 | ||
| 020 | |a 9780804784726 |9 978-0-8047-8472-6 | ||
| 020 | |a 9780804786324 |9 978-0-8047-8632-4 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)841909856 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV043040123 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-1046 |a DE-1047 | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 347.73/26 |2 23 | |
| 100 | 1 | |a Corley, Pamela C. |d 1967- |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a The puzzle of unanimity |b consensus on the United States Supreme Court |c Pamela C. Corley, Amy Steigerwalt, and Artemus Ward |
| 264 | 1 | |a Stanford, California |b Stanford Law Books |c [2013] | |
| 264 | 4 | |c © 2013 | |
| 300 | |a 1 online resource (x, 201 pages) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Print version record | ||
| 505 | 8 | |a The Roosevelt court : the critical juncture from consensus to dissensus -- Closing the jaws of the decision-making vise : a theory and model of consensus -- A function of design : consensus in votes on the merits -- Monolithic solidarity : consensus in opinion writing -- An opportunity to clarify : unanimity and agenda setting | |
| 505 | 8 | |a The U.S. Supreme Court typically rules on cases that present complex legal questions. Given the challenging nature of its cases and the popular view that the Court is divided along ideological lines, it's commonly assumed that the Court routinely hands down equally-divided decisions. Yet the justices actually issue unanimous decisions in approximately one third of the cases they decide. Drawing on data from the U.S. Supreme Court database, internal court documents, and the justices' private papers, The Puzzle of Unanimity provides the first comprehensive account of how the C. | |
| 610 | 1 | 4 | |a United States / Supreme Court |
| 610 | 1 | 7 | |a United States / Supreme Court |2 fast |
| 610 | 2 | 4 | |a United States |b Supreme Court |
| 610 | 2 | 7 | |a USA |b Supreme Court |0 (DE-588)35650-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 7 | |a LAW / Civil Procedure |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a LAW / Legal Services |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a POLITICAL SCIENCE / Government / Judicial Branch |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Consensus (Social sciences) |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Judicial process |2 fast | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Judicial process |z United States | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Consensus (Social sciences) |z United States | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Konsens |0 (DE-588)4010504-0 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 4 | |a USA | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a USA |b Supreme Court |0 (DE-588)35650-5 |D b |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Konsens |0 (DE-588)4010504-0 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |8 1\p |5 DE-604 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Steigerwalt, Amy |d 1976- |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ward, Artemus |d 1971- |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=713591 |x Aggregator |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a ZDB-4-EBA | ||
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-028464770 | ||
| 883 | 1 | |8 1\p |a cgwrk |d 20201028 |q DE-101 |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk | |
| 966 | e | |u http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=713591 |l FAW01 |p ZDB-4-EBA |q FAW_PDA_EBA |x Aggregator |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=713591 |l FAW02 |p ZDB-4-EBA |q FAW_PDA_EBA |x Aggregator |3 Volltext | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804175403464523776 |
|---|---|
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Corley, Pamela C. 1967- |
| author_facet | Corley, Pamela C. 1967- |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Corley, Pamela C. 1967- |
| author_variant | p c c pc pcc |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV043040123 |
| collection | ZDB-4-EBA |
| contents | The Roosevelt court : the critical juncture from consensus to dissensus -- Closing the jaws of the decision-making vise : a theory and model of consensus -- A function of design : consensus in votes on the merits -- Monolithic solidarity : consensus in opinion writing -- An opportunity to clarify : unanimity and agenda setting The U.S. Supreme Court typically rules on cases that present complex legal questions. Given the challenging nature of its cases and the popular view that the Court is divided along ideological lines, it's commonly assumed that the Court routinely hands down equally-divided decisions. Yet the justices actually issue unanimous decisions in approximately one third of the cases they decide. Drawing on data from the U.S. Supreme Court database, internal court documents, and the justices' private papers, The Puzzle of Unanimity provides the first comprehensive account of how the C. |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)841909856 (DE-599)BVBBV043040123 |
| dewey-full | 347.73/26 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 347 - Procedure and courts |
| dewey-raw | 347.73/26 |
| dewey-search | 347.73/26 |
| dewey-sort | 3347.73 226 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03456nmm a2200625zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV043040123</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">151120s2013 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">0804784728</subfield><subfield code="9">0-8047-8472-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">0804786321</subfield><subfield code="9">0-8047-8632-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780804784726</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-8047-8472-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780804786324</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-8047-8632-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)841909856</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV043040123</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-1046</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1047</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">347.73/26</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Corley, Pamela C.</subfield><subfield code="d">1967-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The puzzle of unanimity</subfield><subfield code="b">consensus on the United States Supreme Court</subfield><subfield code="c">Pamela C. Corley, Amy Steigerwalt, and Artemus Ward</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Stanford, California</subfield><subfield code="b">Stanford Law Books</subfield><subfield code="c">[2013]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="c">© 2013</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (x, 201 pages)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Print version record</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The Roosevelt court : the critical juncture from consensus to dissensus -- Closing the jaws of the decision-making vise : a theory and model of consensus -- A function of design : consensus in votes on the merits -- Monolithic solidarity : consensus in opinion writing -- An opportunity to clarify : unanimity and agenda setting</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The U.S. Supreme Court typically rules on cases that present complex legal questions. Given the challenging nature of its cases and the popular view that the Court is divided along ideological lines, it's commonly assumed that the Court routinely hands down equally-divided decisions. Yet the justices actually issue unanimous decisions in approximately one third of the cases they decide. Drawing on data from the U.S. Supreme Court database, internal court documents, and the justices' private papers, The Puzzle of Unanimity provides the first comprehensive account of how the C.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">United States / Supreme Court</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="1" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">United States / Supreme Court</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">United States</subfield><subfield code="b">Supreme Court</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="b">Supreme Court</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)35650-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW / Civil Procedure</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW / Legal Services</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">POLITICAL SCIENCE / Government / Judicial Branch</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Consensus (Social sciences)</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Judicial process</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Judicial process</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Consensus (Social sciences)</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Konsens</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4010504-0</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="b">Supreme Court</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)35650-5</subfield><subfield code="D">b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Konsens</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4010504-0</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Steigerwalt, Amy</subfield><subfield code="d">1976-</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ward, Artemus</subfield><subfield code="d">1971-</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=713591</subfield><subfield code="x">Aggregator</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-028464770</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="883" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="a">cgwrk</subfield><subfield code="d">20201028</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-101</subfield><subfield code="u">https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=713591</subfield><subfield code="l">FAW01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield><subfield code="q">FAW_PDA_EBA</subfield><subfield code="x">Aggregator</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=713591</subfield><subfield code="l">FAW02</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield><subfield code="q">FAW_PDA_EBA</subfield><subfield code="x">Aggregator</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | USA |
| geographic_facet | USA |
| id | DE-604.BV043040123 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T07:15:44Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 0804784728 0804786321 9780804784726 9780804786324 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-028464770 |
| oclc_num | 841909856 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-1046 DE-1047 |
| owner_facet | DE-1046 DE-1047 |
| physical | 1 online resource (x, 201 pages) |
| psigel | ZDB-4-EBA ZDB-4-EBA FAW_PDA_EBA |
| publishDate | 2013 |
| publishDateSearch | 2013 |
| publishDateSort | 2013 |
| publisher | Stanford Law Books |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Corley, Pamela C. 1967- Verfasser aut The puzzle of unanimity consensus on the United States Supreme Court Pamela C. Corley, Amy Steigerwalt, and Artemus Ward Stanford, California Stanford Law Books [2013] © 2013 1 online resource (x, 201 pages) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Print version record The Roosevelt court : the critical juncture from consensus to dissensus -- Closing the jaws of the decision-making vise : a theory and model of consensus -- A function of design : consensus in votes on the merits -- Monolithic solidarity : consensus in opinion writing -- An opportunity to clarify : unanimity and agenda setting The U.S. Supreme Court typically rules on cases that present complex legal questions. Given the challenging nature of its cases and the popular view that the Court is divided along ideological lines, it's commonly assumed that the Court routinely hands down equally-divided decisions. Yet the justices actually issue unanimous decisions in approximately one third of the cases they decide. Drawing on data from the U.S. Supreme Court database, internal court documents, and the justices' private papers, The Puzzle of Unanimity provides the first comprehensive account of how the C. United States / Supreme Court United States / Supreme Court fast United States Supreme Court USA Supreme Court (DE-588)35650-5 gnd rswk-swf LAW / Civil Procedure bisacsh LAW / Legal Services bisacsh POLITICAL SCIENCE / Government / Judicial Branch bisacsh Consensus (Social sciences) fast Judicial process fast Judicial process United States Consensus (Social sciences) United States Konsens (DE-588)4010504-0 gnd rswk-swf USA USA Supreme Court (DE-588)35650-5 b Konsens (DE-588)4010504-0 s 1\p DE-604 Steigerwalt, Amy 1976- Sonstige oth Ward, Artemus 1971- Sonstige oth http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=713591 Aggregator Volltext 1\p cgwrk 20201028 DE-101 https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk |
| spellingShingle | Corley, Pamela C. 1967- The puzzle of unanimity consensus on the United States Supreme Court The Roosevelt court : the critical juncture from consensus to dissensus -- Closing the jaws of the decision-making vise : a theory and model of consensus -- A function of design : consensus in votes on the merits -- Monolithic solidarity : consensus in opinion writing -- An opportunity to clarify : unanimity and agenda setting The U.S. Supreme Court typically rules on cases that present complex legal questions. Given the challenging nature of its cases and the popular view that the Court is divided along ideological lines, it's commonly assumed that the Court routinely hands down equally-divided decisions. Yet the justices actually issue unanimous decisions in approximately one third of the cases they decide. Drawing on data from the U.S. Supreme Court database, internal court documents, and the justices' private papers, The Puzzle of Unanimity provides the first comprehensive account of how the C. United States / Supreme Court United States / Supreme Court fast United States Supreme Court USA Supreme Court (DE-588)35650-5 gnd LAW / Civil Procedure bisacsh LAW / Legal Services bisacsh POLITICAL SCIENCE / Government / Judicial Branch bisacsh Consensus (Social sciences) fast Judicial process fast Judicial process United States Consensus (Social sciences) United States Konsens (DE-588)4010504-0 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)35650-5 (DE-588)4010504-0 |
| title | The puzzle of unanimity consensus on the United States Supreme Court |
| title_auth | The puzzle of unanimity consensus on the United States Supreme Court |
| title_exact_search | The puzzle of unanimity consensus on the United States Supreme Court |
| title_full | The puzzle of unanimity consensus on the United States Supreme Court Pamela C. Corley, Amy Steigerwalt, and Artemus Ward |
| title_fullStr | The puzzle of unanimity consensus on the United States Supreme Court Pamela C. Corley, Amy Steigerwalt, and Artemus Ward |
| title_full_unstemmed | The puzzle of unanimity consensus on the United States Supreme Court Pamela C. Corley, Amy Steigerwalt, and Artemus Ward |
| title_short | The puzzle of unanimity |
| title_sort | the puzzle of unanimity consensus on the united states supreme court |
| title_sub | consensus on the United States Supreme Court |
| topic | United States / Supreme Court United States / Supreme Court fast United States Supreme Court USA Supreme Court (DE-588)35650-5 gnd LAW / Civil Procedure bisacsh LAW / Legal Services bisacsh POLITICAL SCIENCE / Government / Judicial Branch bisacsh Consensus (Social sciences) fast Judicial process fast Judicial process United States Consensus (Social sciences) United States Konsens (DE-588)4010504-0 gnd |
| topic_facet | United States / Supreme Court United States Supreme Court USA Supreme Court LAW / Civil Procedure LAW / Legal Services POLITICAL SCIENCE / Government / Judicial Branch Consensus (Social sciences) Judicial process Judicial process United States Consensus (Social sciences) United States Konsens USA |
| url | http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=713591 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT corleypamelac thepuzzleofunanimityconsensusontheunitedstatessupremecourt AT steigerwaltamy thepuzzleofunanimityconsensusontheunitedstatessupremecourt AT wardartemus thepuzzleofunanimityconsensusontheunitedstatessupremecourt |