Review of disability evaluation study design: third interim report
Gespeichert in:
| Weitere Verfasser: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Washington, D.C.
National Academy Press
[1999]
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | FAW01 FAW02 Volltext |
| Beschreibung: | Title from PDF title page Version viewed November 25, 2014 |
| Beschreibung: | 1 online resource (1 PDF file (vii, 30 pages)) |
| ISBN: | 0309068304 0309593913 0585213526 9780309068307 9780309593915 9780585213521 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV043038173 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 151120s1999 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 0309068304 |9 0-309-06830-4 | ||
| 020 | |a 0309593913 |9 0-309-59391-3 | ||
| 020 | |a 0585213526 |9 0-585-21352-6 | ||
| 020 | |a 9780309068307 |9 978-0-309-06830-7 | ||
| 020 | |a 9780309593915 |9 978-0-309-59391-5 | ||
| 020 | |a 9780585213521 |9 978-0-585-21352-1 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)44958964 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV043038173 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-1046 |a DE-1047 | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 616.07/5/072073 |2 21 | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Review of disability evaluation study design |b third interim report |c Gooloo S. Wunderlich, William D. Kalsbeek, editors ; Committee to Review the Social Security Administration's Disability Decision Process Research, Division of Health Care Services Institute of Medicine and Committee on National Statistics, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council |
| 264 | 1 | |a Washington, D.C. |b National Academy Press |c [1999] | |
| 300 | |a 1 online resource (1 PDF file (vii, 30 pages)) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Title from PDF title page | ||
| 500 | |a Version viewed November 25, 2014 | ||
| 505 | 8 | |a The Social Security Administration (SSA) has been engaged in a major effort to redesign the process for determining disability for cash benefits and medical assistance under its Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI), Title II of the Social Security Act and the Supplemental Security Income (SSI), Title XVI of the Social Security Act. Because of the complexity and far-reaching impact of its efforts, SSA concluded that the redesign effort requires extensive research, testing, and validation, as well as further development of some of its components before national implementation. The effect of the new determination process on the number and characteristics of future beneficiaries also needs further study. The agency asked the National Academies to provide ongoing independent and unbiased review of, and recommendations on, its current and proposed research as it relates to the development of a revised disability decision process including the approach, survey design, and content of the complex multiyear Disability Evaluation Study (DES). The present report is the third in a series of short interim reports of the National Academies' Committee to Review the SSA's Disability Decision Process. This third interim report relates directly to one of the contract tasks-review of the design, approach, and content of the DES, as proposed by SSA's contractor for the survey, Westat, Inc. This report is limited to a brief review of the sample design (including that of the pilot study), instruments and procedures, and response rates goals developed by Westat and provided by SSA in June 1999 to the committee for its review and recommendations. It also comments on the proposed timeline for initiation of each phase of the survey | |
| 505 | 8 | |a 1. Introduction -- 2. Overview of the disability evaluation study -- 3. Committee reactions -- 4. Concluding comments -- References -- Appendix -- Acronyms and abbreviations -- Biographical sketches of committee members | |
| 610 | 1 | 4 | |a United States / Social Security Administration |
| 610 | 1 | 4 | |a United States / Social Security Administration / Rules and practice / Evaluation |
| 610 | 2 | 4 | |a United States |b Social Security Administration |x Rules and practice |x Evaluation |
| 650 | 4 | |a Disability Evaluation / United States | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Eligibility Determination / United States | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Evaluation Studies as Topic / United States | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Insurance, Disability / organization & administration / United States | |
| 650 | 7 | |a MEDICAL / Diagnosis |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a MEDICAL / Laboratory Medicine |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a MEDICAL / Nursing / Assessment & Diagnosis |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Medizin | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Disability evaluation |x Research |z United States | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Disability insurance | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Supplemental security income program |z United States | |
| 651 | 4 | |a USA | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Wunderlich, Gooloo S. |4 edt | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kalsbeek, William D. |d 1946- |4 edt | |
| 710 | 2 | |a Institute of Medicine (U.S.) |b Committee to Review the Social Security Administration's Disability Decision Process Research |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
| 710 | 2 | |a National Research Council (U.S.) |b Committee on National Statistics |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe |a Review of disability evaluation study design |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=27123 |x Aggregator |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a ZDB-4-EBA | ||
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-028462820 | ||
| 966 | e | |u http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=27123 |l FAW01 |p ZDB-4-EBA |q FAW_PDA_EBA |x Aggregator |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=27123 |l FAW02 |p ZDB-4-EBA |q FAW_PDA_EBA |x Aggregator |3 Volltext | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804175399890976768 |
|---|---|
| any_adam_object | |
| author2 | Wunderlich, Gooloo S. Kalsbeek, William D. 1946- |
| author2_role | edt edt |
| author2_variant | g s w gs gsw w d k wd wdk |
| author_facet | Wunderlich, Gooloo S. Kalsbeek, William D. 1946- |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV043038173 |
| collection | ZDB-4-EBA |
| contents | The Social Security Administration (SSA) has been engaged in a major effort to redesign the process for determining disability for cash benefits and medical assistance under its Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI), Title II of the Social Security Act and the Supplemental Security Income (SSI), Title XVI of the Social Security Act. Because of the complexity and far-reaching impact of its efforts, SSA concluded that the redesign effort requires extensive research, testing, and validation, as well as further development of some of its components before national implementation. The effect of the new determination process on the number and characteristics of future beneficiaries also needs further study. The agency asked the National Academies to provide ongoing independent and unbiased review of, and recommendations on, its current and proposed research as it relates to the development of a revised disability decision process including the approach, survey design, and content of the complex multiyear Disability Evaluation Study (DES). The present report is the third in a series of short interim reports of the National Academies' Committee to Review the SSA's Disability Decision Process. This third interim report relates directly to one of the contract tasks-review of the design, approach, and content of the DES, as proposed by SSA's contractor for the survey, Westat, Inc. This report is limited to a brief review of the sample design (including that of the pilot study), instruments and procedures, and response rates goals developed by Westat and provided by SSA in June 1999 to the committee for its review and recommendations. It also comments on the proposed timeline for initiation of each phase of the survey 1. Introduction -- 2. Overview of the disability evaluation study -- 3. Committee reactions -- 4. Concluding comments -- References -- Appendix -- Acronyms and abbreviations -- Biographical sketches of committee members |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)44958964 (DE-599)BVBBV043038173 |
| dewey-full | 616.07/5/072073 |
| dewey-hundreds | 600 - Technology (Applied sciences) |
| dewey-ones | 616 - Diseases |
| dewey-raw | 616.07/5/072073 |
| dewey-search | 616.07/5/072073 |
| dewey-sort | 3616.07 15 572073 |
| dewey-tens | 610 - Medicine and health |
| discipline | Medizin |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>05214nmm a2200649zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV043038173</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">151120s1999 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">0309068304</subfield><subfield code="9">0-309-06830-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">0309593913</subfield><subfield code="9">0-309-59391-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">0585213526</subfield><subfield code="9">0-585-21352-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780309068307</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-309-06830-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780309593915</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-309-59391-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780585213521</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-585-21352-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)44958964</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV043038173</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-1046</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1047</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">616.07/5/072073</subfield><subfield code="2">21</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Review of disability evaluation study design</subfield><subfield code="b">third interim report</subfield><subfield code="c">Gooloo S. Wunderlich, William D. Kalsbeek, editors ; Committee to Review the Social Security Administration's Disability Decision Process Research, Division of Health Care Services Institute of Medicine and Committee on National Statistics, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Washington, D.C.</subfield><subfield code="b">National Academy Press</subfield><subfield code="c">[1999]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (1 PDF file (vii, 30 pages))</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Title from PDF title page</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Version viewed November 25, 2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The Social Security Administration (SSA) has been engaged in a major effort to redesign the process for determining disability for cash benefits and medical assistance under its Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI), Title II of the Social Security Act and the Supplemental Security Income (SSI), Title XVI of the Social Security Act. Because of the complexity and far-reaching impact of its efforts, SSA concluded that the redesign effort requires extensive research, testing, and validation, as well as further development of some of its components before national implementation. The effect of the new determination process on the number and characteristics of future beneficiaries also needs further study. The agency asked the National Academies to provide ongoing independent and unbiased review of, and recommendations on, its current and proposed research as it relates to the development of a revised disability decision process including the approach, survey design, and content of the complex multiyear Disability Evaluation Study (DES). The present report is the third in a series of short interim reports of the National Academies' Committee to Review the SSA's Disability Decision Process. This third interim report relates directly to one of the contract tasks-review of the design, approach, and content of the DES, as proposed by SSA's contractor for the survey, Westat, Inc. This report is limited to a brief review of the sample design (including that of the pilot study), instruments and procedures, and response rates goals developed by Westat and provided by SSA in June 1999 to the committee for its review and recommendations. It also comments on the proposed timeline for initiation of each phase of the survey</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1. Introduction -- 2. Overview of the disability evaluation study -- 3. Committee reactions -- 4. Concluding comments -- References -- Appendix -- Acronyms and abbreviations -- Biographical sketches of committee members</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">United States / Social Security Administration</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">United States / Social Security Administration / Rules and practice / Evaluation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">United States</subfield><subfield code="b">Social Security Administration</subfield><subfield code="x">Rules and practice</subfield><subfield code="x">Evaluation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Disability Evaluation / United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Eligibility Determination / United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Evaluation Studies as Topic / United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Insurance, Disability / organization & administration / United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">MEDICAL / Diagnosis</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">MEDICAL / Laboratory Medicine</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">MEDICAL / Nursing / Assessment & Diagnosis</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Medizin</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Disability evaluation</subfield><subfield code="x">Research</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Disability insurance</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Supplemental security income program</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wunderlich, Gooloo S.</subfield><subfield code="4">edt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kalsbeek, William D.</subfield><subfield code="d">1946-</subfield><subfield code="4">edt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Institute of Medicine (U.S.)</subfield><subfield code="b">Committee to Review the Social Security Administration's Disability Decision Process Research</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">National Research Council (U.S.)</subfield><subfield code="b">Committee on National Statistics</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="a">Review of disability evaluation study design</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=27123</subfield><subfield code="x">Aggregator</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-028462820</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=27123</subfield><subfield code="l">FAW01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield><subfield code="q">FAW_PDA_EBA</subfield><subfield code="x">Aggregator</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=27123</subfield><subfield code="l">FAW02</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield><subfield code="q">FAW_PDA_EBA</subfield><subfield code="x">Aggregator</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | USA |
| geographic_facet | USA |
| id | DE-604.BV043038173 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T07:15:41Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 0309068304 0309593913 0585213526 9780309068307 9780309593915 9780585213521 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-028462820 |
| oclc_num | 44958964 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-1046 DE-1047 |
| owner_facet | DE-1046 DE-1047 |
| physical | 1 online resource (1 PDF file (vii, 30 pages)) |
| psigel | ZDB-4-EBA ZDB-4-EBA FAW_PDA_EBA |
| publishDate | 1999 |
| publishDateSearch | 1999 |
| publishDateSort | 1999 |
| publisher | National Academy Press |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Review of disability evaluation study design third interim report Gooloo S. Wunderlich, William D. Kalsbeek, editors ; Committee to Review the Social Security Administration's Disability Decision Process Research, Division of Health Care Services Institute of Medicine and Committee on National Statistics, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council Washington, D.C. National Academy Press [1999] 1 online resource (1 PDF file (vii, 30 pages)) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Title from PDF title page Version viewed November 25, 2014 The Social Security Administration (SSA) has been engaged in a major effort to redesign the process for determining disability for cash benefits and medical assistance under its Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI), Title II of the Social Security Act and the Supplemental Security Income (SSI), Title XVI of the Social Security Act. Because of the complexity and far-reaching impact of its efforts, SSA concluded that the redesign effort requires extensive research, testing, and validation, as well as further development of some of its components before national implementation. The effect of the new determination process on the number and characteristics of future beneficiaries also needs further study. The agency asked the National Academies to provide ongoing independent and unbiased review of, and recommendations on, its current and proposed research as it relates to the development of a revised disability decision process including the approach, survey design, and content of the complex multiyear Disability Evaluation Study (DES). The present report is the third in a series of short interim reports of the National Academies' Committee to Review the SSA's Disability Decision Process. This third interim report relates directly to one of the contract tasks-review of the design, approach, and content of the DES, as proposed by SSA's contractor for the survey, Westat, Inc. This report is limited to a brief review of the sample design (including that of the pilot study), instruments and procedures, and response rates goals developed by Westat and provided by SSA in June 1999 to the committee for its review and recommendations. It also comments on the proposed timeline for initiation of each phase of the survey 1. Introduction -- 2. Overview of the disability evaluation study -- 3. Committee reactions -- 4. Concluding comments -- References -- Appendix -- Acronyms and abbreviations -- Biographical sketches of committee members United States / Social Security Administration United States / Social Security Administration / Rules and practice / Evaluation United States Social Security Administration Rules and practice Evaluation Disability Evaluation / United States Eligibility Determination / United States Evaluation Studies as Topic / United States Insurance, Disability / organization & administration / United States MEDICAL / Diagnosis bisacsh MEDICAL / Laboratory Medicine bisacsh MEDICAL / Nursing / Assessment & Diagnosis bisacsh Medizin Disability evaluation Research United States Disability insurance Supplemental security income program United States USA Wunderlich, Gooloo S. edt Kalsbeek, William D. 1946- edt Institute of Medicine (U.S.) Committee to Review the Social Security Administration's Disability Decision Process Research Sonstige oth National Research Council (U.S.) Committee on National Statistics Sonstige oth Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe Review of disability evaluation study design http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=27123 Aggregator Volltext |
| spellingShingle | Review of disability evaluation study design third interim report The Social Security Administration (SSA) has been engaged in a major effort to redesign the process for determining disability for cash benefits and medical assistance under its Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI), Title II of the Social Security Act and the Supplemental Security Income (SSI), Title XVI of the Social Security Act. Because of the complexity and far-reaching impact of its efforts, SSA concluded that the redesign effort requires extensive research, testing, and validation, as well as further development of some of its components before national implementation. The effect of the new determination process on the number and characteristics of future beneficiaries also needs further study. The agency asked the National Academies to provide ongoing independent and unbiased review of, and recommendations on, its current and proposed research as it relates to the development of a revised disability decision process including the approach, survey design, and content of the complex multiyear Disability Evaluation Study (DES). The present report is the third in a series of short interim reports of the National Academies' Committee to Review the SSA's Disability Decision Process. This third interim report relates directly to one of the contract tasks-review of the design, approach, and content of the DES, as proposed by SSA's contractor for the survey, Westat, Inc. This report is limited to a brief review of the sample design (including that of the pilot study), instruments and procedures, and response rates goals developed by Westat and provided by SSA in June 1999 to the committee for its review and recommendations. It also comments on the proposed timeline for initiation of each phase of the survey 1. Introduction -- 2. Overview of the disability evaluation study -- 3. Committee reactions -- 4. Concluding comments -- References -- Appendix -- Acronyms and abbreviations -- Biographical sketches of committee members United States / Social Security Administration United States / Social Security Administration / Rules and practice / Evaluation United States Social Security Administration Rules and practice Evaluation Disability Evaluation / United States Eligibility Determination / United States Evaluation Studies as Topic / United States Insurance, Disability / organization & administration / United States MEDICAL / Diagnosis bisacsh MEDICAL / Laboratory Medicine bisacsh MEDICAL / Nursing / Assessment & Diagnosis bisacsh Medizin Disability evaluation Research United States Disability insurance Supplemental security income program United States |
| title | Review of disability evaluation study design third interim report |
| title_auth | Review of disability evaluation study design third interim report |
| title_exact_search | Review of disability evaluation study design third interim report |
| title_full | Review of disability evaluation study design third interim report Gooloo S. Wunderlich, William D. Kalsbeek, editors ; Committee to Review the Social Security Administration's Disability Decision Process Research, Division of Health Care Services Institute of Medicine and Committee on National Statistics, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council |
| title_fullStr | Review of disability evaluation study design third interim report Gooloo S. Wunderlich, William D. Kalsbeek, editors ; Committee to Review the Social Security Administration's Disability Decision Process Research, Division of Health Care Services Institute of Medicine and Committee on National Statistics, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council |
| title_full_unstemmed | Review of disability evaluation study design third interim report Gooloo S. Wunderlich, William D. Kalsbeek, editors ; Committee to Review the Social Security Administration's Disability Decision Process Research, Division of Health Care Services Institute of Medicine and Committee on National Statistics, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council |
| title_short | Review of disability evaluation study design |
| title_sort | review of disability evaluation study design third interim report |
| title_sub | third interim report |
| topic | United States / Social Security Administration United States / Social Security Administration / Rules and practice / Evaluation United States Social Security Administration Rules and practice Evaluation Disability Evaluation / United States Eligibility Determination / United States Evaluation Studies as Topic / United States Insurance, Disability / organization & administration / United States MEDICAL / Diagnosis bisacsh MEDICAL / Laboratory Medicine bisacsh MEDICAL / Nursing / Assessment & Diagnosis bisacsh Medizin Disability evaluation Research United States Disability insurance Supplemental security income program United States |
| topic_facet | United States / Social Security Administration United States / Social Security Administration / Rules and practice / Evaluation United States Social Security Administration Rules and practice Evaluation Disability Evaluation / United States Eligibility Determination / United States Evaluation Studies as Topic / United States Insurance, Disability / organization & administration / United States MEDICAL / Diagnosis MEDICAL / Laboratory Medicine MEDICAL / Nursing / Assessment & Diagnosis Medizin Disability evaluation Research United States Disability insurance Supplemental security income program United States USA |
| url | http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=27123 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT wunderlichgooloos reviewofdisabilityevaluationstudydesignthirdinterimreport AT kalsbeekwilliamd reviewofdisabilityevaluationstudydesignthirdinterimreport AT instituteofmedicineuscommitteetoreviewthesocialsecurityadministrationsdisabilitydecisionprocessresearch reviewofdisabilityevaluationstudydesignthirdinterimreport AT nationalresearchcounciluscommitteeonnationalstatistics reviewofdisabilityevaluationstudydesignthirdinterimreport |