The Responsibility to Protect: Implementation of Article 4(h) Intervention
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Leiden
BRILL
2010
|
| Schriftenreihe: | Raoul Wallenberg Institute human rights library
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | FAW01 FAW02 Volltext |
| Beschreibung: | Print version record. - 2.2.5. Can Consent Preclude Wrongfulness of Unilateral Article (4h)Intervention? |
| Beschreibung: | 1 online resource (552 pages) |
| ISBN: | 9004215964 9789004215962 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV043033582 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 151120s2010 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9004215964 |c electronic bk. |9 90-04-21596-4 | ||
| 020 | |a 9789004215962 |c electronic bk. |9 978-90-04-21596-2 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)833764516 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV043033582 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-1046 |a DE-1047 | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 341.584096 | |
| 082 | 0 | |a 341.5/84096 | |
| 100 | 1 | |a Kuwali, Dan |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a The Responsibility to Protect |b Implementation of Article 4(h) Intervention |
| 264 | 1 | |a Leiden |b BRILL |c 2010 | |
| 300 | |a 1 online resource (552 pages) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a Raoul Wallenberg Institute human rights library | |
| 500 | |a Print version record. - 2.2.5. Can Consent Preclude Wrongfulness of Unilateral Article (4h)Intervention? | ||
| 505 | 8 | |a Acknowledgements; Glossary of Abbreviations; Table of Cases; Introduction; I. Approach and Theoretical Framework of the Study; A. Purpose and Subject Matter of the Inquiry; B. Conceptual Background and Problem Statement; C. Research Questions; II. Preliminary Considerations; A. The Congruence of Article 4(h) Intervention and R2P; B. Humanitarian Intervention and the Problems of Definition; C. Is Article 4(h) Enforcement Action by Consent?; D. The Question Whether Article 4(h) is a Codification of a Regional Custom?; E. Article 4(h) as Erga Omnes Contractantes for Jus Cogens Crimes | |
| 505 | 8 | |a F. The Issue of "Illegal but Legitimate" Approach in International LawIII. Methodology and Materials; A. Method of Inquiry; B. Sources and Materials; C. Significance of the Study; D. Limitation of the Study; IV. Disposition; Part One: The Question of Treaty-Based Intervention; 1 The End of Humanitarian Intervention:Article 4(h) Intervention; 1.1. Introduction; 1.1.1. Historical Background of International Intervention; 1.1.2. The Tension between "Humanitarian Intervention" and StateSovereignty; 1.2. The Traditional Position towards Non-intervention in Africa | |
| 505 | 8 | |a 1.3. Sovereignty or Survival? -- Rethinking State Sovereignty in Africa1.4. The Genesis and Metamorphosis of the AU's Right to Intervene; 1.4.1. The Influence of the UN on State Practice towards Non-Indifference in Africa; 1.4.2. Intervention by Invitation: Intervention within Sub-RegionalOrganisations; 1.4.3. The Rationale for Article 4(h) as Discerned from Practice ofAfrican States; 1.4.4. The Turning Point from Non-Interference to Non-Indifference; 1.5. Institutional Framework for Deciding on Article 4(h) Intervention; 1.6. Whither Article 4(h)? -- Supranational Statutory Intervention | |
| 505 | 8 | |a 1.6.1. Sovereignty as a Responsibility:The Duality of the Responsibility to Protect1.6.2. Mass Atrocity Crimes: Conditions Triggering Article 4(h); 1.7. Why Article 4(h) May Gain Weight in International Law?; 1.7.1. The International Community's Acceptance of the"Responsibility to Protect"; 1.7.2. The Room for Enforcement by Consent under the UN Charter; 1.7.3. The Inconsistency of the UN Security Council to Discharge ItsResponsibility; 1.7.4. The AU's Right to Intervene is a Pro-Sovereignty Doctrine; 1.8. Summary: Article 4(h) is Statutory (not Humanitarian) Intervention | |
| 505 | 8 | |a 2 Authorised Authorisation?The Question of Enforcement by Consent2.1. Introduction; 2.2. The Prohibition of the Use of Force under Article 2(4) of theUN Charter; 2.2.1. Intervention Not Against "Territorial Integrity" nor"Political Independence"; 2.2.2. Is the Use of Force to Protect Human Rights Forbidden Intervention?; 2.2.3. The "Domestic Jurisdiction Clause" under Article 2(7) of the UNCharter; 2.2.3. Is Article 4(h) Lawful Means under Article 41(1) ARSIWA?; 2.2.4. Can the AU Right of Intervention be Justified as Necessity? | |
| 505 | 8 | |a This book explores the scope and limits of Article 4(h) of the African Union Constitutive Act (AU Act). The goal is to generate new thinking on, and contribute a fresh legal approach to, the implementation of the right to intervene under Article 4 (h) of the AU Act in the face of war crimes, genocide and crimes against humanity | |
| 610 | 2 | 7 | |a Afrikanische Union |0 (DE-588)10042911-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 630 | 0 | 4 | |a Constitutive Act of the African Union |
| 650 | 4 | |a Constitutive Act of the African Union | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Responsibility to protect (International law) / Africa | |
| 650 | 7 | |a LAW / International |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Internationales Recht | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Responsibility to protect (International law) |z Africa | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Intervention (International law) | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Responsibility to Protect |0 (DE-588)7742862-6 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Intervention |g Völkerrecht |0 (DE-588)4197565-0 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 4 | |a Afrika | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Afrikanische Union |0 (DE-588)10042911-7 |D b |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Intervention |g Völkerrecht |0 (DE-588)4197565-0 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Responsibility to Protect |0 (DE-588)7742862-6 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |8 1\p |5 DE-604 | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe |a Kuwali, Dan |t Responsibility to Protect : Implementation of Article 4(h) Intervention |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=552295 |x Aggregator |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a ZDB-4-EBA | ||
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-028458232 | ||
| 883 | 1 | |8 1\p |a cgwrk |d 20201028 |q DE-101 |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk | |
| 966 | e | |u http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=552295 |l FAW01 |p ZDB-4-EBA |q FAW_PDA_EBA |x Aggregator |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=552295 |l FAW02 |p ZDB-4-EBA |q FAW_PDA_EBA |x Aggregator |3 Volltext | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804175391779192832 |
|---|---|
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Kuwali, Dan |
| author_facet | Kuwali, Dan |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Kuwali, Dan |
| author_variant | d k dk |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV043033582 |
| collection | ZDB-4-EBA |
| contents | Acknowledgements; Glossary of Abbreviations; Table of Cases; Introduction; I. Approach and Theoretical Framework of the Study; A. Purpose and Subject Matter of the Inquiry; B. Conceptual Background and Problem Statement; C. Research Questions; II. Preliminary Considerations; A. The Congruence of Article 4(h) Intervention and R2P; B. Humanitarian Intervention and the Problems of Definition; C. Is Article 4(h) Enforcement Action by Consent?; D. The Question Whether Article 4(h) is a Codification of a Regional Custom?; E. Article 4(h) as Erga Omnes Contractantes for Jus Cogens Crimes F. The Issue of "Illegal but Legitimate" Approach in International LawIII. Methodology and Materials; A. Method of Inquiry; B. Sources and Materials; C. Significance of the Study; D. Limitation of the Study; IV. Disposition; Part One: The Question of Treaty-Based Intervention; 1 The End of Humanitarian Intervention:Article 4(h) Intervention; 1.1. Introduction; 1.1.1. Historical Background of International Intervention; 1.1.2. The Tension between "Humanitarian Intervention" and StateSovereignty; 1.2. The Traditional Position towards Non-intervention in Africa 1.3. Sovereignty or Survival? -- Rethinking State Sovereignty in Africa1.4. The Genesis and Metamorphosis of the AU's Right to Intervene; 1.4.1. The Influence of the UN on State Practice towards Non-Indifference in Africa; 1.4.2. Intervention by Invitation: Intervention within Sub-RegionalOrganisations; 1.4.3. The Rationale for Article 4(h) as Discerned from Practice ofAfrican States; 1.4.4. The Turning Point from Non-Interference to Non-Indifference; 1.5. Institutional Framework for Deciding on Article 4(h) Intervention; 1.6. Whither Article 4(h)? -- Supranational Statutory Intervention 1.6.1. Sovereignty as a Responsibility:The Duality of the Responsibility to Protect1.6.2. Mass Atrocity Crimes: Conditions Triggering Article 4(h); 1.7. Why Article 4(h) May Gain Weight in International Law?; 1.7.1. The International Community's Acceptance of the"Responsibility to Protect"; 1.7.2. The Room for Enforcement by Consent under the UN Charter; 1.7.3. The Inconsistency of the UN Security Council to Discharge ItsResponsibility; 1.7.4. The AU's Right to Intervene is a Pro-Sovereignty Doctrine; 1.8. Summary: Article 4(h) is Statutory (not Humanitarian) Intervention 2 Authorised Authorisation?The Question of Enforcement by Consent2.1. Introduction; 2.2. The Prohibition of the Use of Force under Article 2(4) of theUN Charter; 2.2.1. Intervention Not Against "Territorial Integrity" nor"Political Independence"; 2.2.2. Is the Use of Force to Protect Human Rights Forbidden Intervention?; 2.2.3. The "Domestic Jurisdiction Clause" under Article 2(7) of the UNCharter; 2.2.3. Is Article 4(h) Lawful Means under Article 41(1) ARSIWA?; 2.2.4. Can the AU Right of Intervention be Justified as Necessity? This book explores the scope and limits of Article 4(h) of the African Union Constitutive Act (AU Act). The goal is to generate new thinking on, and contribute a fresh legal approach to, the implementation of the right to intervene under Article 4 (h) of the AU Act in the face of war crimes, genocide and crimes against humanity |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)833764516 (DE-599)BVBBV043033582 |
| dewey-full | 341.584096 341.5/84096 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 341 - Law of nations |
| dewey-raw | 341.584096 341.5/84096 |
| dewey-search | 341.584096 341.5/84096 |
| dewey-sort | 3341.584096 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>05887nmm a2200637zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV043033582</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">151120s2010 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9004215964</subfield><subfield code="c">electronic bk.</subfield><subfield code="9">90-04-21596-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9789004215962</subfield><subfield code="c">electronic bk.</subfield><subfield code="9">978-90-04-21596-2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)833764516</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV043033582</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-1046</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1047</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">341.584096</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">341.5/84096</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kuwali, Dan</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The Responsibility to Protect</subfield><subfield code="b">Implementation of Article 4(h) Intervention</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Leiden</subfield><subfield code="b">BRILL</subfield><subfield code="c">2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (552 pages)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Raoul Wallenberg Institute human rights library</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Print version record. - 2.2.5. Can Consent Preclude Wrongfulness of Unilateral Article (4h)Intervention?</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Acknowledgements; Glossary of Abbreviations; Table of Cases; Introduction; I. Approach and Theoretical Framework of the Study; A. Purpose and Subject Matter of the Inquiry; B. Conceptual Background and Problem Statement; C. Research Questions; II. Preliminary Considerations; A. The Congruence of Article 4(h) Intervention and R2P; B. Humanitarian Intervention and the Problems of Definition; C. Is Article 4(h) Enforcement Action by Consent?; D. The Question Whether Article 4(h) is a Codification of a Regional Custom?; E. Article 4(h) as Erga Omnes Contractantes for Jus Cogens Crimes</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">F. The Issue of "Illegal but Legitimate" Approach in International LawIII. Methodology and Materials; A. Method of Inquiry; B. Sources and Materials; C. Significance of the Study; D. Limitation of the Study; IV. Disposition; Part One: The Question of Treaty-Based Intervention; 1 The End of Humanitarian Intervention:Article 4(h) Intervention; 1.1. Introduction; 1.1.1. Historical Background of International Intervention; 1.1.2. The Tension between "Humanitarian Intervention" and StateSovereignty; 1.2. The Traditional Position towards Non-intervention in Africa</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1.3. Sovereignty or Survival? -- Rethinking State Sovereignty in Africa1.4. The Genesis and Metamorphosis of the AU's Right to Intervene; 1.4.1. The Influence of the UN on State Practice towards Non-Indifference in Africa; 1.4.2. Intervention by Invitation: Intervention within Sub-RegionalOrganisations; 1.4.3. The Rationale for Article 4(h) as Discerned from Practice ofAfrican States; 1.4.4. The Turning Point from Non-Interference to Non-Indifference; 1.5. Institutional Framework for Deciding on Article 4(h) Intervention; 1.6. Whither Article 4(h)? -- Supranational Statutory Intervention</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1.6.1. Sovereignty as a Responsibility:The Duality of the Responsibility to Protect1.6.2. Mass Atrocity Crimes: Conditions Triggering Article 4(h); 1.7. Why Article 4(h) May Gain Weight in International Law?; 1.7.1. The International Community's Acceptance of the"Responsibility to Protect"; 1.7.2. The Room for Enforcement by Consent under the UN Charter; 1.7.3. The Inconsistency of the UN Security Council to Discharge ItsResponsibility; 1.7.4. The AU's Right to Intervene is a Pro-Sovereignty Doctrine; 1.8. Summary: Article 4(h) is Statutory (not Humanitarian) Intervention</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">2 Authorised Authorisation?The Question of Enforcement by Consent2.1. Introduction; 2.2. The Prohibition of the Use of Force under Article 2(4) of theUN Charter; 2.2.1. Intervention Not Against "Territorial Integrity" nor"Political Independence"; 2.2.2. Is the Use of Force to Protect Human Rights Forbidden Intervention?; 2.2.3. The "Domestic Jurisdiction Clause" under Article 2(7) of the UNCharter; 2.2.3. Is Article 4(h) Lawful Means under Article 41(1) ARSIWA?; 2.2.4. Can the AU Right of Intervention be Justified as Necessity?</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This book explores the scope and limits of Article 4(h) of the African Union Constitutive Act (AU Act). The goal is to generate new thinking on, and contribute a fresh legal approach to, the implementation of the right to intervene under Article 4 (h) of the AU Act in the face of war crimes, genocide and crimes against humanity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Afrikanische Union</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)10042911-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="630" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Constitutive Act of the African Union</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Constitutive Act of the African Union</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Responsibility to protect (International law) / Africa</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW / International</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Internationales Recht</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Responsibility to protect (International law)</subfield><subfield code="z">Africa</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Intervention (International law)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Responsibility to Protect</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)7742862-6</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Intervention</subfield><subfield code="g">Völkerrecht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4197565-0</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Afrika</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Afrikanische Union</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)10042911-7</subfield><subfield code="D">b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Intervention</subfield><subfield code="g">Völkerrecht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4197565-0</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Responsibility to Protect</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)7742862-6</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="a">Kuwali, Dan</subfield><subfield code="t">Responsibility to Protect : Implementation of Article 4(h) Intervention</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=552295</subfield><subfield code="x">Aggregator</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-028458232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="883" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="a">cgwrk</subfield><subfield code="d">20201028</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-101</subfield><subfield code="u">https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=552295</subfield><subfield code="l">FAW01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield><subfield code="q">FAW_PDA_EBA</subfield><subfield code="x">Aggregator</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=552295</subfield><subfield code="l">FAW02</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield><subfield code="q">FAW_PDA_EBA</subfield><subfield code="x">Aggregator</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | Afrika |
| geographic_facet | Afrika |
| id | DE-604.BV043033582 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T07:15:33Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9004215964 9789004215962 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-028458232 |
| oclc_num | 833764516 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-1046 DE-1047 |
| owner_facet | DE-1046 DE-1047 |
| physical | 1 online resource (552 pages) |
| psigel | ZDB-4-EBA ZDB-4-EBA FAW_PDA_EBA |
| publishDate | 2010 |
| publishDateSearch | 2010 |
| publishDateSort | 2010 |
| publisher | BRILL |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | Raoul Wallenberg Institute human rights library |
| spelling | Kuwali, Dan Verfasser aut The Responsibility to Protect Implementation of Article 4(h) Intervention Leiden BRILL 2010 1 online resource (552 pages) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Raoul Wallenberg Institute human rights library Print version record. - 2.2.5. Can Consent Preclude Wrongfulness of Unilateral Article (4h)Intervention? Acknowledgements; Glossary of Abbreviations; Table of Cases; Introduction; I. Approach and Theoretical Framework of the Study; A. Purpose and Subject Matter of the Inquiry; B. Conceptual Background and Problem Statement; C. Research Questions; II. Preliminary Considerations; A. The Congruence of Article 4(h) Intervention and R2P; B. Humanitarian Intervention and the Problems of Definition; C. Is Article 4(h) Enforcement Action by Consent?; D. The Question Whether Article 4(h) is a Codification of a Regional Custom?; E. Article 4(h) as Erga Omnes Contractantes for Jus Cogens Crimes F. The Issue of "Illegal but Legitimate" Approach in International LawIII. Methodology and Materials; A. Method of Inquiry; B. Sources and Materials; C. Significance of the Study; D. Limitation of the Study; IV. Disposition; Part One: The Question of Treaty-Based Intervention; 1 The End of Humanitarian Intervention:Article 4(h) Intervention; 1.1. Introduction; 1.1.1. Historical Background of International Intervention; 1.1.2. The Tension between "Humanitarian Intervention" and StateSovereignty; 1.2. The Traditional Position towards Non-intervention in Africa 1.3. Sovereignty or Survival? -- Rethinking State Sovereignty in Africa1.4. The Genesis and Metamorphosis of the AU's Right to Intervene; 1.4.1. The Influence of the UN on State Practice towards Non-Indifference in Africa; 1.4.2. Intervention by Invitation: Intervention within Sub-RegionalOrganisations; 1.4.3. The Rationale for Article 4(h) as Discerned from Practice ofAfrican States; 1.4.4. The Turning Point from Non-Interference to Non-Indifference; 1.5. Institutional Framework for Deciding on Article 4(h) Intervention; 1.6. Whither Article 4(h)? -- Supranational Statutory Intervention 1.6.1. Sovereignty as a Responsibility:The Duality of the Responsibility to Protect1.6.2. Mass Atrocity Crimes: Conditions Triggering Article 4(h); 1.7. Why Article 4(h) May Gain Weight in International Law?; 1.7.1. The International Community's Acceptance of the"Responsibility to Protect"; 1.7.2. The Room for Enforcement by Consent under the UN Charter; 1.7.3. The Inconsistency of the UN Security Council to Discharge ItsResponsibility; 1.7.4. The AU's Right to Intervene is a Pro-Sovereignty Doctrine; 1.8. Summary: Article 4(h) is Statutory (not Humanitarian) Intervention 2 Authorised Authorisation?The Question of Enforcement by Consent2.1. Introduction; 2.2. The Prohibition of the Use of Force under Article 2(4) of theUN Charter; 2.2.1. Intervention Not Against "Territorial Integrity" nor"Political Independence"; 2.2.2. Is the Use of Force to Protect Human Rights Forbidden Intervention?; 2.2.3. The "Domestic Jurisdiction Clause" under Article 2(7) of the UNCharter; 2.2.3. Is Article 4(h) Lawful Means under Article 41(1) ARSIWA?; 2.2.4. Can the AU Right of Intervention be Justified as Necessity? This book explores the scope and limits of Article 4(h) of the African Union Constitutive Act (AU Act). The goal is to generate new thinking on, and contribute a fresh legal approach to, the implementation of the right to intervene under Article 4 (h) of the AU Act in the face of war crimes, genocide and crimes against humanity Afrikanische Union (DE-588)10042911-7 gnd rswk-swf Constitutive Act of the African Union Responsibility to protect (International law) / Africa LAW / International bisacsh Internationales Recht Responsibility to protect (International law) Africa Intervention (International law) Responsibility to Protect (DE-588)7742862-6 gnd rswk-swf Intervention Völkerrecht (DE-588)4197565-0 gnd rswk-swf Afrika Afrikanische Union (DE-588)10042911-7 b Intervention Völkerrecht (DE-588)4197565-0 s Responsibility to Protect (DE-588)7742862-6 s 1\p DE-604 Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe Kuwali, Dan Responsibility to Protect : Implementation of Article 4(h) Intervention http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=552295 Aggregator Volltext 1\p cgwrk 20201028 DE-101 https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk |
| spellingShingle | Kuwali, Dan The Responsibility to Protect Implementation of Article 4(h) Intervention Acknowledgements; Glossary of Abbreviations; Table of Cases; Introduction; I. Approach and Theoretical Framework of the Study; A. Purpose and Subject Matter of the Inquiry; B. Conceptual Background and Problem Statement; C. Research Questions; II. Preliminary Considerations; A. The Congruence of Article 4(h) Intervention and R2P; B. Humanitarian Intervention and the Problems of Definition; C. Is Article 4(h) Enforcement Action by Consent?; D. The Question Whether Article 4(h) is a Codification of a Regional Custom?; E. Article 4(h) as Erga Omnes Contractantes for Jus Cogens Crimes F. The Issue of "Illegal but Legitimate" Approach in International LawIII. Methodology and Materials; A. Method of Inquiry; B. Sources and Materials; C. Significance of the Study; D. Limitation of the Study; IV. Disposition; Part One: The Question of Treaty-Based Intervention; 1 The End of Humanitarian Intervention:Article 4(h) Intervention; 1.1. Introduction; 1.1.1. Historical Background of International Intervention; 1.1.2. The Tension between "Humanitarian Intervention" and StateSovereignty; 1.2. The Traditional Position towards Non-intervention in Africa 1.3. Sovereignty or Survival? -- Rethinking State Sovereignty in Africa1.4. The Genesis and Metamorphosis of the AU's Right to Intervene; 1.4.1. The Influence of the UN on State Practice towards Non-Indifference in Africa; 1.4.2. Intervention by Invitation: Intervention within Sub-RegionalOrganisations; 1.4.3. The Rationale for Article 4(h) as Discerned from Practice ofAfrican States; 1.4.4. The Turning Point from Non-Interference to Non-Indifference; 1.5. Institutional Framework for Deciding on Article 4(h) Intervention; 1.6. Whither Article 4(h)? -- Supranational Statutory Intervention 1.6.1. Sovereignty as a Responsibility:The Duality of the Responsibility to Protect1.6.2. Mass Atrocity Crimes: Conditions Triggering Article 4(h); 1.7. Why Article 4(h) May Gain Weight in International Law?; 1.7.1. The International Community's Acceptance of the"Responsibility to Protect"; 1.7.2. The Room for Enforcement by Consent under the UN Charter; 1.7.3. The Inconsistency of the UN Security Council to Discharge ItsResponsibility; 1.7.4. The AU's Right to Intervene is a Pro-Sovereignty Doctrine; 1.8. Summary: Article 4(h) is Statutory (not Humanitarian) Intervention 2 Authorised Authorisation?The Question of Enforcement by Consent2.1. Introduction; 2.2. The Prohibition of the Use of Force under Article 2(4) of theUN Charter; 2.2.1. Intervention Not Against "Territorial Integrity" nor"Political Independence"; 2.2.2. Is the Use of Force to Protect Human Rights Forbidden Intervention?; 2.2.3. The "Domestic Jurisdiction Clause" under Article 2(7) of the UNCharter; 2.2.3. Is Article 4(h) Lawful Means under Article 41(1) ARSIWA?; 2.2.4. Can the AU Right of Intervention be Justified as Necessity? This book explores the scope and limits of Article 4(h) of the African Union Constitutive Act (AU Act). The goal is to generate new thinking on, and contribute a fresh legal approach to, the implementation of the right to intervene under Article 4 (h) of the AU Act in the face of war crimes, genocide and crimes against humanity Afrikanische Union (DE-588)10042911-7 gnd Constitutive Act of the African Union Responsibility to protect (International law) / Africa LAW / International bisacsh Internationales Recht Responsibility to protect (International law) Africa Intervention (International law) Responsibility to Protect (DE-588)7742862-6 gnd Intervention Völkerrecht (DE-588)4197565-0 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)10042911-7 (DE-588)7742862-6 (DE-588)4197565-0 |
| title | The Responsibility to Protect Implementation of Article 4(h) Intervention |
| title_auth | The Responsibility to Protect Implementation of Article 4(h) Intervention |
| title_exact_search | The Responsibility to Protect Implementation of Article 4(h) Intervention |
| title_full | The Responsibility to Protect Implementation of Article 4(h) Intervention |
| title_fullStr | The Responsibility to Protect Implementation of Article 4(h) Intervention |
| title_full_unstemmed | The Responsibility to Protect Implementation of Article 4(h) Intervention |
| title_short | The Responsibility to Protect |
| title_sort | the responsibility to protect implementation of article 4 h intervention |
| title_sub | Implementation of Article 4(h) Intervention |
| topic | Afrikanische Union (DE-588)10042911-7 gnd Constitutive Act of the African Union Responsibility to protect (International law) / Africa LAW / International bisacsh Internationales Recht Responsibility to protect (International law) Africa Intervention (International law) Responsibility to Protect (DE-588)7742862-6 gnd Intervention Völkerrecht (DE-588)4197565-0 gnd |
| topic_facet | Afrikanische Union Constitutive Act of the African Union Responsibility to protect (International law) / Africa LAW / International Internationales Recht Responsibility to protect (International law) Africa Intervention (International law) Responsibility to Protect Intervention Völkerrecht Afrika |
| url | http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=552295 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT kuwalidan theresponsibilitytoprotectimplementationofarticle4hintervention |