National Security in the Courts: the Need for Secrecy vs. the Requirement of Transparency
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
El Paso
LFB Scholarly Pub. LLC
2010
|
Schriftenreihe: | Recht und Gesellschaft
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | FAW01 FAW02 Volltext |
Beschreibung: | Print version record |
Beschreibung: | 1 online resource (273 pages) |
ISBN: | 1593326548 9781593326548 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV043031784 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 151120s2010 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
020 | |a 1593326548 |9 1-59332-654-8 | ||
020 | |a 9781593326548 |9 978-1-59332-654-8 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)818818944 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV043031784 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-1046 |a DE-1047 | ||
082 | 0 | |a 342.730853 | |
082 | 0 | |a 342.7308/53 | |
100 | 1 | |a Silver, Derigan Almond |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a National Security in the Courts |b the Need for Secrecy vs. the Requirement of Transparency |
264 | 1 | |a El Paso |b LFB Scholarly Pub. LLC |c 2010 | |
300 | |a 1 online resource (273 pages) | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 0 | |a Recht und Gesellschaft | |
500 | |a Print version record | ||
505 | 8 | |a Acknowledgements; CHAPTER 1: Introduction; Liberal Democratic Theory and the First Amendment; Government Secrecy and National Security; Judicial Decision Making; CHAPTER 2: Prior Restraints; Prior Restraints, National Security and the Press; Prior Restraints, National Security and GovernmentEmployees; Prior Restraints, National Security and theUSA PATRIOT Act; Prior Restraints and the Judiciary; CHAPTER 3: Post-publication Punishments; Post-publication Punishments and National Security; Post-publication Punishments and the Judiciary; CHAPTER 4: Access | |
505 | 8 | |a Access to National Security InformationAccess to National Security Locations; Access to Judicial Proceedings and Documents; CHAPTER 5: Conclusion; National Security and Transparency Frames; National Security and Transparency Factors; Comparing National Security to Judiciary Cases; Conclusion; References; Case Index; Subject Index | |
505 | 8 | |a Silver explores how judges identified the main legal issues in federal cases dealing with national security through the mode of legal analysis they used to reach or justify their conclusions. He explains how national security/transparency cases are as much about separation of powers issues as they are about balancing transparency with national security. In addition, although legal precedent remains important, judges have other, less traditional tools at their disposal. Finally, Silver concludes that the ability to selectively choose which legal issue to focus on and rely on some modes of legal | |
650 | 4 | |a Censorship / United States | |
650 | 4 | |a Freedom of information / United States | |
650 | 4 | |a Freedom of the press / United States | |
650 | 4 | |a National security / Law and legislation / United States | |
650 | 7 | |a LAW / Constitutional |2 bisacsh | |
650 | 7 | |a LAW / Public |2 bisacsh | |
650 | 7 | |a Censorship |2 fast | |
650 | 7 | |a Freedom of information |2 fast | |
650 | 7 | |a Freedom of the press |2 fast | |
650 | 7 | |a National security / Law and legislation |2 fast | |
650 | 4 | |a Recht | |
650 | 4 | |a Freedom of the press |z United States | |
650 | 4 | |a Freedom of information |z United States | |
650 | 4 | |a National security |x Law and legislation |z United States | |
650 | 4 | |a Censorship |z United States | |
651 | 4 | |a USA | |
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe |a Silver, Derigan Almond |t National Security in the Courts : The Need for Secrecy vs. the Requirement of Transparency |
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druckausgabe |z 1-59332-420-0 |
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druckausgabe |z 978-1-59332-420-9 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=520606 |x Aggregator |3 Volltext |
912 | |a ZDB-4-EBA | ||
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-028456435 | ||
966 | e | |u http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=520606 |l FAW01 |p ZDB-4-EBA |q FAW_PDA_EBA |x Aggregator |3 Volltext | |
966 | e | |u http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=520606 |l FAW02 |p ZDB-4-EBA |q FAW_PDA_EBA |x Aggregator |3 Volltext |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804175388545384448 |
---|---|
any_adam_object | |
author | Silver, Derigan Almond |
author_facet | Silver, Derigan Almond |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Silver, Derigan Almond |
author_variant | d a s da das |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV043031784 |
collection | ZDB-4-EBA |
contents | Acknowledgements; CHAPTER 1: Introduction; Liberal Democratic Theory and the First Amendment; Government Secrecy and National Security; Judicial Decision Making; CHAPTER 2: Prior Restraints; Prior Restraints, National Security and the Press; Prior Restraints, National Security and GovernmentEmployees; Prior Restraints, National Security and theUSA PATRIOT Act; Prior Restraints and the Judiciary; CHAPTER 3: Post-publication Punishments; Post-publication Punishments and National Security; Post-publication Punishments and the Judiciary; CHAPTER 4: Access Access to National Security InformationAccess to National Security Locations; Access to Judicial Proceedings and Documents; CHAPTER 5: Conclusion; National Security and Transparency Frames; National Security and Transparency Factors; Comparing National Security to Judiciary Cases; Conclusion; References; Case Index; Subject Index Silver explores how judges identified the main legal issues in federal cases dealing with national security through the mode of legal analysis they used to reach or justify their conclusions. He explains how national security/transparency cases are as much about separation of powers issues as they are about balancing transparency with national security. In addition, although legal precedent remains important, judges have other, less traditional tools at their disposal. Finally, Silver concludes that the ability to selectively choose which legal issue to focus on and rely on some modes of legal |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)818818944 (DE-599)BVBBV043031784 |
dewey-full | 342.730853 342.7308/53 |
dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
dewey-ones | 342 - Constitutional and administrative law |
dewey-raw | 342.730853 342.7308/53 |
dewey-search | 342.730853 342.7308/53 |
dewey-sort | 3342.730853 |
dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
format | Electronic eBook |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>04022nmm a2200625zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV043031784</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">151120s2010 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1593326548</subfield><subfield code="9">1-59332-654-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781593326548</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-59332-654-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)818818944</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV043031784</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-1046</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1047</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">342.730853</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">342.7308/53</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Silver, Derigan Almond</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">National Security in the Courts</subfield><subfield code="b">the Need for Secrecy vs. the Requirement of Transparency</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">El Paso</subfield><subfield code="b">LFB Scholarly Pub. LLC</subfield><subfield code="c">2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (273 pages)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Recht und Gesellschaft</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Print version record</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Acknowledgements; CHAPTER 1: Introduction; Liberal Democratic Theory and the First Amendment; Government Secrecy and National Security; Judicial Decision Making; CHAPTER 2: Prior Restraints; Prior Restraints, National Security and the Press; Prior Restraints, National Security and GovernmentEmployees; Prior Restraints, National Security and theUSA PATRIOT Act; Prior Restraints and the Judiciary; CHAPTER 3: Post-publication Punishments; Post-publication Punishments and National Security; Post-publication Punishments and the Judiciary; CHAPTER 4: Access</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Access to National Security InformationAccess to National Security Locations; Access to Judicial Proceedings and Documents; CHAPTER 5: Conclusion; National Security and Transparency Frames; National Security and Transparency Factors; Comparing National Security to Judiciary Cases; Conclusion; References; Case Index; Subject Index</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Silver explores how judges identified the main legal issues in federal cases dealing with national security through the mode of legal analysis they used to reach or justify their conclusions. He explains how national security/transparency cases are as much about separation of powers issues as they are about balancing transparency with national security. In addition, although legal precedent remains important, judges have other, less traditional tools at their disposal. Finally, Silver concludes that the ability to selectively choose which legal issue to focus on and rely on some modes of legal</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Censorship / United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Freedom of information / United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Freedom of the press / United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">National security / Law and legislation / United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW / Constitutional</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW / Public</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Censorship</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Freedom of information</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Freedom of the press</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">National security / Law and legislation</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Recht</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Freedom of the press</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Freedom of information</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">National security</subfield><subfield code="x">Law and legislation</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Censorship</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="a">Silver, Derigan Almond</subfield><subfield code="t">National Security in the Courts : The Need for Secrecy vs. the Requirement of Transparency</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druckausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">1-59332-420-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druckausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">978-1-59332-420-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=520606</subfield><subfield code="x">Aggregator</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-028456435</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=520606</subfield><subfield code="l">FAW01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield><subfield code="q">FAW_PDA_EBA</subfield><subfield code="x">Aggregator</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=520606</subfield><subfield code="l">FAW02</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield><subfield code="q">FAW_PDA_EBA</subfield><subfield code="x">Aggregator</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
geographic | USA |
geographic_facet | USA |
id | DE-604.BV043031784 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-07-10T07:15:30Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 1593326548 9781593326548 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-028456435 |
oclc_num | 818818944 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-1046 DE-1047 |
owner_facet | DE-1046 DE-1047 |
physical | 1 online resource (273 pages) |
psigel | ZDB-4-EBA ZDB-4-EBA FAW_PDA_EBA |
publishDate | 2010 |
publishDateSearch | 2010 |
publishDateSort | 2010 |
publisher | LFB Scholarly Pub. LLC |
record_format | marc |
series2 | Recht und Gesellschaft |
spelling | Silver, Derigan Almond Verfasser aut National Security in the Courts the Need for Secrecy vs. the Requirement of Transparency El Paso LFB Scholarly Pub. LLC 2010 1 online resource (273 pages) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Recht und Gesellschaft Print version record Acknowledgements; CHAPTER 1: Introduction; Liberal Democratic Theory and the First Amendment; Government Secrecy and National Security; Judicial Decision Making; CHAPTER 2: Prior Restraints; Prior Restraints, National Security and the Press; Prior Restraints, National Security and GovernmentEmployees; Prior Restraints, National Security and theUSA PATRIOT Act; Prior Restraints and the Judiciary; CHAPTER 3: Post-publication Punishments; Post-publication Punishments and National Security; Post-publication Punishments and the Judiciary; CHAPTER 4: Access Access to National Security InformationAccess to National Security Locations; Access to Judicial Proceedings and Documents; CHAPTER 5: Conclusion; National Security and Transparency Frames; National Security and Transparency Factors; Comparing National Security to Judiciary Cases; Conclusion; References; Case Index; Subject Index Silver explores how judges identified the main legal issues in federal cases dealing with national security through the mode of legal analysis they used to reach or justify their conclusions. He explains how national security/transparency cases are as much about separation of powers issues as they are about balancing transparency with national security. In addition, although legal precedent remains important, judges have other, less traditional tools at their disposal. Finally, Silver concludes that the ability to selectively choose which legal issue to focus on and rely on some modes of legal Censorship / United States Freedom of information / United States Freedom of the press / United States National security / Law and legislation / United States LAW / Constitutional bisacsh LAW / Public bisacsh Censorship fast Freedom of information fast Freedom of the press fast National security / Law and legislation fast Recht Freedom of the press United States Freedom of information United States National security Law and legislation United States Censorship United States USA Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe Silver, Derigan Almond National Security in the Courts : The Need for Secrecy vs. the Requirement of Transparency Erscheint auch als Druckausgabe 1-59332-420-0 Erscheint auch als Druckausgabe 978-1-59332-420-9 http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=520606 Aggregator Volltext |
spellingShingle | Silver, Derigan Almond National Security in the Courts the Need for Secrecy vs. the Requirement of Transparency Acknowledgements; CHAPTER 1: Introduction; Liberal Democratic Theory and the First Amendment; Government Secrecy and National Security; Judicial Decision Making; CHAPTER 2: Prior Restraints; Prior Restraints, National Security and the Press; Prior Restraints, National Security and GovernmentEmployees; Prior Restraints, National Security and theUSA PATRIOT Act; Prior Restraints and the Judiciary; CHAPTER 3: Post-publication Punishments; Post-publication Punishments and National Security; Post-publication Punishments and the Judiciary; CHAPTER 4: Access Access to National Security InformationAccess to National Security Locations; Access to Judicial Proceedings and Documents; CHAPTER 5: Conclusion; National Security and Transparency Frames; National Security and Transparency Factors; Comparing National Security to Judiciary Cases; Conclusion; References; Case Index; Subject Index Silver explores how judges identified the main legal issues in federal cases dealing with national security through the mode of legal analysis they used to reach or justify their conclusions. He explains how national security/transparency cases are as much about separation of powers issues as they are about balancing transparency with national security. In addition, although legal precedent remains important, judges have other, less traditional tools at their disposal. Finally, Silver concludes that the ability to selectively choose which legal issue to focus on and rely on some modes of legal Censorship / United States Freedom of information / United States Freedom of the press / United States National security / Law and legislation / United States LAW / Constitutional bisacsh LAW / Public bisacsh Censorship fast Freedom of information fast Freedom of the press fast National security / Law and legislation fast Recht Freedom of the press United States Freedom of information United States National security Law and legislation United States Censorship United States |
title | National Security in the Courts the Need for Secrecy vs. the Requirement of Transparency |
title_auth | National Security in the Courts the Need for Secrecy vs. the Requirement of Transparency |
title_exact_search | National Security in the Courts the Need for Secrecy vs. the Requirement of Transparency |
title_full | National Security in the Courts the Need for Secrecy vs. the Requirement of Transparency |
title_fullStr | National Security in the Courts the Need for Secrecy vs. the Requirement of Transparency |
title_full_unstemmed | National Security in the Courts the Need for Secrecy vs. the Requirement of Transparency |
title_short | National Security in the Courts |
title_sort | national security in the courts the need for secrecy vs the requirement of transparency |
title_sub | the Need for Secrecy vs. the Requirement of Transparency |
topic | Censorship / United States Freedom of information / United States Freedom of the press / United States National security / Law and legislation / United States LAW / Constitutional bisacsh LAW / Public bisacsh Censorship fast Freedom of information fast Freedom of the press fast National security / Law and legislation fast Recht Freedom of the press United States Freedom of information United States National security Law and legislation United States Censorship United States |
topic_facet | Censorship / United States Freedom of information / United States Freedom of the press / United States National security / Law and legislation / United States LAW / Constitutional LAW / Public Censorship Freedom of information Freedom of the press National security / Law and legislation Recht Freedom of the press United States Freedom of information United States National security Law and legislation United States Censorship United States USA |
url | http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=520606 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT silverderiganalmond nationalsecurityinthecourtstheneedforsecrecyvstherequirementoftransparency |