The possibility of inquiry: Meno's Paradox from Socrates to Sextus
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Oxford
Oxford University Press
2014
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | FAW01 FAW02 Volltext |
| Beschreibung: | Description based on PDF title page (viewed April 3, 2014) |
| Beschreibung: | 1 online resource |
| ISBN: | 0191502472 9780191502477 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV043030048 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 151120s2014 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 0191502472 |c electronic bk. |9 0-19-150247-2 | ||
| 020 | |a 9780191502477 |c electronic bk. |9 978-0-19-150247-7 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)875582440 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV043030048 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-1046 |a DE-1047 | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 180/.9495 |2 23 | |
| 100 | 1 | |a Fine, Gail |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a The possibility of inquiry |b Meno's Paradox from Socrates to Sextus |c Gail Fine |
| 264 | 1 | |a Oxford |b Oxford University Press |c 2014 | |
| 300 | |a 1 online resource | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Description based on PDF title page (viewed April 3, 2014) | ||
| 505 | 8 | |a Meno's Paradox, which is first formulated in Plato's Meno, challenges the very possibility of inquiry. Plato replies with the theory of recollection, according to which we all had prenatal knowledge of some range of things, and what we call inquiry involves recollecting what we previously knew; he also illustrates this with his famous cross-examination of an untutored slave about a geometry problem, whose solution the slave is able to discover through inquiry. Hence, contrary to the paradox, inquiry is possible after all. Plato is not the only philosopher to grapple with Meno's Paradox: so too do Aristotle, the Epicureans, the Stoics, and Sextus. How do their various replies compare with one another, and with Plato's? How good are any of their replies? In a fascinating fragment preserved in Damascius' Commentary on the Phaedo, Plutarch briefly considers these questions (though for obvious chronological reasons he doesn't discuss Sextus) | |
| 600 | 1 | 7 | |a Plato |2 fast |
| 600 | 1 | 4 | |a Plato |
| 600 | 1 | 4 | |a Plato |
| 600 | 0 | 7 | |a Plato |d v427-v347 |t Meno |0 (DE-588)4344761-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 7 | |a PHILOSOPHY / History & Surveys / Ancient & Classical |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Inquiry (Theory of knowledge) |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Philosophy, Ancient |2 fast | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Inquiry (Theory of knowledge) | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Philosophy, Ancient | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Plato |d v427-v347 |t Meno |0 (DE-588)4344761-2 |D u |
| 689 | 0 | |8 1\p |5 DE-604 | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=748993 |x Aggregator |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a ZDB-4-EBA | ||
| 940 | 1 | |q gbd_dub | |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-028454700 | ||
| 883 | 1 | |8 1\p |a cgwrk |d 20201028 |q DE-101 |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk | |
| 966 | e | |u http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=748993 |l FAW01 |p ZDB-4-EBA |q FAW_PDA_EBA |x Aggregator |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=748993 |l FAW02 |p ZDB-4-EBA |q FAW_PDA_EBA |x Aggregator |3 Volltext | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804175385723666432 |
|---|---|
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Fine, Gail |
| author_facet | Fine, Gail |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Fine, Gail |
| author_variant | g f gf |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV043030048 |
| collection | ZDB-4-EBA |
| contents | Meno's Paradox, which is first formulated in Plato's Meno, challenges the very possibility of inquiry. Plato replies with the theory of recollection, according to which we all had prenatal knowledge of some range of things, and what we call inquiry involves recollecting what we previously knew; he also illustrates this with his famous cross-examination of an untutored slave about a geometry problem, whose solution the slave is able to discover through inquiry. Hence, contrary to the paradox, inquiry is possible after all. Plato is not the only philosopher to grapple with Meno's Paradox: so too do Aristotle, the Epicureans, the Stoics, and Sextus. How do their various replies compare with one another, and with Plato's? How good are any of their replies? In a fascinating fragment preserved in Damascius' Commentary on the Phaedo, Plutarch briefly considers these questions (though for obvious chronological reasons he doesn't discuss Sextus) |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)875582440 (DE-599)BVBBV043030048 |
| dewey-full | 180/.9495 |
| dewey-hundreds | 100 - Philosophy & psychology |
| dewey-ones | 180 - Ancient, medieval, eastern philosophy |
| dewey-raw | 180/.9495 |
| dewey-search | 180/.9495 |
| dewey-sort | 3180 49495 |
| dewey-tens | 180 - Ancient, medieval, eastern philosophy |
| discipline | Philosophie |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02974nmm a2200505zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV043030048</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">151120s2014 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">0191502472</subfield><subfield code="c">electronic bk.</subfield><subfield code="9">0-19-150247-2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780191502477</subfield><subfield code="c">electronic bk.</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-19-150247-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)875582440</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV043030048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-1046</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1047</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">180/.9495</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Fine, Gail</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The possibility of inquiry</subfield><subfield code="b">Meno's Paradox from Socrates to Sextus</subfield><subfield code="c">Gail Fine</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Oxford</subfield><subfield code="b">Oxford University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Description based on PDF title page (viewed April 3, 2014)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Meno's Paradox, which is first formulated in Plato's Meno, challenges the very possibility of inquiry. Plato replies with the theory of recollection, according to which we all had prenatal knowledge of some range of things, and what we call inquiry involves recollecting what we previously knew; he also illustrates this with his famous cross-examination of an untutored slave about a geometry problem, whose solution the slave is able to discover through inquiry. Hence, contrary to the paradox, inquiry is possible after all. Plato is not the only philosopher to grapple with Meno's Paradox: so too do Aristotle, the Epicureans, the Stoics, and Sextus. How do their various replies compare with one another, and with Plato's? How good are any of their replies? In a fascinating fragment preserved in Damascius' Commentary on the Phaedo, Plutarch briefly considers these questions (though for obvious chronological reasons he doesn't discuss Sextus)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="600" ind1="1" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Plato</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="600" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Plato</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="600" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Plato</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="600" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Plato</subfield><subfield code="d">v427-v347</subfield><subfield code="t">Meno</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4344761-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">PHILOSOPHY / History & Surveys / Ancient & Classical</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Inquiry (Theory of knowledge)</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Philosophy, Ancient</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Inquiry (Theory of knowledge)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Philosophy, Ancient</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Plato</subfield><subfield code="d">v427-v347</subfield><subfield code="t">Meno</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4344761-2</subfield><subfield code="D">u</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=748993</subfield><subfield code="x">Aggregator</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">gbd_dub</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-028454700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="883" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="a">cgwrk</subfield><subfield code="d">20201028</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-101</subfield><subfield code="u">https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=748993</subfield><subfield code="l">FAW01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield><subfield code="q">FAW_PDA_EBA</subfield><subfield code="x">Aggregator</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=748993</subfield><subfield code="l">FAW02</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield><subfield code="q">FAW_PDA_EBA</subfield><subfield code="x">Aggregator</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV043030048 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T07:15:27Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 0191502472 9780191502477 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-028454700 |
| oclc_num | 875582440 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-1046 DE-1047 |
| owner_facet | DE-1046 DE-1047 |
| physical | 1 online resource |
| psigel | ZDB-4-EBA gbd_dub ZDB-4-EBA FAW_PDA_EBA |
| publishDate | 2014 |
| publishDateSearch | 2014 |
| publishDateSort | 2014 |
| publisher | Oxford University Press |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Fine, Gail Verfasser aut The possibility of inquiry Meno's Paradox from Socrates to Sextus Gail Fine Oxford Oxford University Press 2014 1 online resource txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Description based on PDF title page (viewed April 3, 2014) Meno's Paradox, which is first formulated in Plato's Meno, challenges the very possibility of inquiry. Plato replies with the theory of recollection, according to which we all had prenatal knowledge of some range of things, and what we call inquiry involves recollecting what we previously knew; he also illustrates this with his famous cross-examination of an untutored slave about a geometry problem, whose solution the slave is able to discover through inquiry. Hence, contrary to the paradox, inquiry is possible after all. Plato is not the only philosopher to grapple with Meno's Paradox: so too do Aristotle, the Epicureans, the Stoics, and Sextus. How do their various replies compare with one another, and with Plato's? How good are any of their replies? In a fascinating fragment preserved in Damascius' Commentary on the Phaedo, Plutarch briefly considers these questions (though for obvious chronological reasons he doesn't discuss Sextus) Plato fast Plato Plato v427-v347 Meno (DE-588)4344761-2 gnd rswk-swf PHILOSOPHY / History & Surveys / Ancient & Classical bisacsh Inquiry (Theory of knowledge) fast Philosophy, Ancient fast Inquiry (Theory of knowledge) Philosophy, Ancient Plato v427-v347 Meno (DE-588)4344761-2 u 1\p DE-604 http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=748993 Aggregator Volltext 1\p cgwrk 20201028 DE-101 https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk |
| spellingShingle | Fine, Gail The possibility of inquiry Meno's Paradox from Socrates to Sextus Meno's Paradox, which is first formulated in Plato's Meno, challenges the very possibility of inquiry. Plato replies with the theory of recollection, according to which we all had prenatal knowledge of some range of things, and what we call inquiry involves recollecting what we previously knew; he also illustrates this with his famous cross-examination of an untutored slave about a geometry problem, whose solution the slave is able to discover through inquiry. Hence, contrary to the paradox, inquiry is possible after all. Plato is not the only philosopher to grapple with Meno's Paradox: so too do Aristotle, the Epicureans, the Stoics, and Sextus. How do their various replies compare with one another, and with Plato's? How good are any of their replies? In a fascinating fragment preserved in Damascius' Commentary on the Phaedo, Plutarch briefly considers these questions (though for obvious chronological reasons he doesn't discuss Sextus) Plato fast Plato Plato v427-v347 Meno (DE-588)4344761-2 gnd PHILOSOPHY / History & Surveys / Ancient & Classical bisacsh Inquiry (Theory of knowledge) fast Philosophy, Ancient fast Inquiry (Theory of knowledge) Philosophy, Ancient |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4344761-2 |
| title | The possibility of inquiry Meno's Paradox from Socrates to Sextus |
| title_auth | The possibility of inquiry Meno's Paradox from Socrates to Sextus |
| title_exact_search | The possibility of inquiry Meno's Paradox from Socrates to Sextus |
| title_full | The possibility of inquiry Meno's Paradox from Socrates to Sextus Gail Fine |
| title_fullStr | The possibility of inquiry Meno's Paradox from Socrates to Sextus Gail Fine |
| title_full_unstemmed | The possibility of inquiry Meno's Paradox from Socrates to Sextus Gail Fine |
| title_short | The possibility of inquiry |
| title_sort | the possibility of inquiry meno s paradox from socrates to sextus |
| title_sub | Meno's Paradox from Socrates to Sextus |
| topic | Plato fast Plato Plato v427-v347 Meno (DE-588)4344761-2 gnd PHILOSOPHY / History & Surveys / Ancient & Classical bisacsh Inquiry (Theory of knowledge) fast Philosophy, Ancient fast Inquiry (Theory of knowledge) Philosophy, Ancient |
| topic_facet | Plato Plato v427-v347 Meno PHILOSOPHY / History & Surveys / Ancient & Classical Inquiry (Theory of knowledge) Philosophy, Ancient |
| url | http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=748993 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT finegail thepossibilityofinquirymenosparadoxfromsocratestosextus |