Making the soldier decisive on future battlefields:
Gespeichert in:
| Körperschaft: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Washington, D.C.
National Academies Press
2013
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | FAW01 FAW02 Volltext |
| Beschreibung: | Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (NAP, viewed May 21, 2013) |
| Beschreibung: | 1 online resource (xvi, 239 pages) colored illustrations |
| ISBN: | 0309284546 9780309284547 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV043027040 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 151120s2013 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 0309284546 |9 0-309-28454-6 | ||
| 020 | |a 9780309284547 |9 978-0-309-28454-7 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)843885487 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV043027040 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-1046 |a DE-1047 | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 355.8/0973 |2 23 | |
| 110 | 2 | |a National Research Council (U.S.) |b Board on Army Science and Technology |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Making the soldier decisive on future battlefields |c Committee on Making the Soldier Decisive on Future Battlefields, Board on Army Science and Technology, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences |
| 264 | 1 | |a Washington, D.C. |b National Academies Press |c 2013 | |
| 264 | 4 | |c © 2013 | |
| 300 | |a 1 online resource (xvi, 239 pages) |b colored illustrations | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (NAP, viewed May 21, 2013) | ||
| 505 | 8 | |a Summary. -- Introduction. -- Capabilities. -- Setting the conditions to achieve soldier and TSU overmatch. -- Achieving overmatch. -- Appendixes | |
| 505 | 8 | |a This study resulted from recognition by the U.S. Army that a great disparity exists between the decisive overmatch capability, relative to prospective adversaries, of major U.S. weapon systems (such as tanks, fighter aircraft, or nuclear submarines) and the relative vulnerability of dismounted soldiers when they are operating in small, detached units (squads). The increased reliance in recent Army deployments on soldiers operating in these tactical small units (TSUs), as well as the expanding responsibilities of ground forces in the future for missions that go beyond traditional combat, provided the incentive to ask what could be done to give dismounted soldiers and TSUs a credible degree of decisive overmatch in any of the anticipated future operational environments. The focus of this study was achieving decisive overmatch for the dismounted Soldier and tactical small unit (TSU) on future battlefields. | |
| 505 | 8 | |a In particular, the committee was asked to determine the elements of overmatch capabilities necessary to achieve decisiveness, identify technical requirements for optimizing Soldiers and small units, identify near-, mid-, and far-term technologies for investment, and determine the relative importance of such investments. To examine the desired elements of decisive overmatch, Chapter 2 identifies capabilities needed for decisive overmatch by Soldiers and small units in dismounted infantry squad operations, including situational understanding, military effects (including lethal and nonlethal effects and stability actions), maneuverability, sustainability, and survivability. Chapter 3 then articulates the foundational capabilities needed to identify and implement potential solutions. Finally, Chapter 4 describes how to achieve overmatch by focusing on the five areas most likely to enable improvements in Soldier and TSU decisiveness. | |
| 505 | 8 | |a The study will examine the applicability of systems engineering to soldiers and small units, as well as specific technology areas that are relevant to making soldiers decisive, particularly in conditions where we still take casualties today (movement to contact and chance encounters). Technology areas to be considered should include (but not be limited to) situational awareness, weapons, mobility, and protection, adaptation to battlefield environments (e.g., clothing, cooling), communications and networking, human dynamics (e.g., physical, cognitive, behavioral), and logistical support (e.g., medical aid, food, water, energy) | |
| 610 | 1 | 7 | |a United States / Army |2 fast |
| 610 | 2 | 4 | |a United States |b Army |x Weapons systems |
| 610 | 2 | 4 | |a United States |b Army |x Planning |
| 650 | 7 | |a Armed Forces / Planning |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Armed Forces / Weapons systems |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Combat survivability (Military engineering) |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Military planning |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Military research |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a HISTORY / Military / Other |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING / Military Science |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Military planning |z United States | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Combat survivability (Military engineering) | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Military research |z United States | |
| 651 | 4 | |a USA | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe |a National Research Council (U.S.). Board on Army Science and Technology. Making the soldier decisive on future battlefields |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druckausgabe |z 0-309-28453-8 |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druckausgabe |z 978-0-309-28453-0 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=867808 |x Aggregator |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a ZDB-4-EBA | ||
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-028451694 | ||
| 966 | e | |u http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=867808 |l FAW01 |p ZDB-4-EBA |q FAW_PDA_EBA |x Aggregator |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=867808 |l FAW02 |p ZDB-4-EBA |q FAW_PDA_EBA |x Aggregator |3 Volltext | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804175380861419520 |
|---|---|
| any_adam_object | |
| author_corporate | National Research Council (U.S.) Board on Army Science and Technology |
| author_corporate_role | aut |
| author_facet | National Research Council (U.S.) Board on Army Science and Technology |
| author_sort | National Research Council (U.S.) Board on Army Science and Technology |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV043027040 |
| collection | ZDB-4-EBA |
| contents | Summary. -- Introduction. -- Capabilities. -- Setting the conditions to achieve soldier and TSU overmatch. -- Achieving overmatch. -- Appendixes This study resulted from recognition by the U.S. Army that a great disparity exists between the decisive overmatch capability, relative to prospective adversaries, of major U.S. weapon systems (such as tanks, fighter aircraft, or nuclear submarines) and the relative vulnerability of dismounted soldiers when they are operating in small, detached units (squads). The increased reliance in recent Army deployments on soldiers operating in these tactical small units (TSUs), as well as the expanding responsibilities of ground forces in the future for missions that go beyond traditional combat, provided the incentive to ask what could be done to give dismounted soldiers and TSUs a credible degree of decisive overmatch in any of the anticipated future operational environments. The focus of this study was achieving decisive overmatch for the dismounted Soldier and tactical small unit (TSU) on future battlefields. In particular, the committee was asked to determine the elements of overmatch capabilities necessary to achieve decisiveness, identify technical requirements for optimizing Soldiers and small units, identify near-, mid-, and far-term technologies for investment, and determine the relative importance of such investments. To examine the desired elements of decisive overmatch, Chapter 2 identifies capabilities needed for decisive overmatch by Soldiers and small units in dismounted infantry squad operations, including situational understanding, military effects (including lethal and nonlethal effects and stability actions), maneuverability, sustainability, and survivability. Chapter 3 then articulates the foundational capabilities needed to identify and implement potential solutions. Finally, Chapter 4 describes how to achieve overmatch by focusing on the five areas most likely to enable improvements in Soldier and TSU decisiveness. The study will examine the applicability of systems engineering to soldiers and small units, as well as specific technology areas that are relevant to making soldiers decisive, particularly in conditions where we still take casualties today (movement to contact and chance encounters). Technology areas to be considered should include (but not be limited to) situational awareness, weapons, mobility, and protection, adaptation to battlefield environments (e.g., clothing, cooling), communications and networking, human dynamics (e.g., physical, cognitive, behavioral), and logistical support (e.g., medical aid, food, water, energy) |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)843885487 (DE-599)BVBBV043027040 |
| dewey-full | 355.8/0973 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 355 - Military science |
| dewey-raw | 355.8/0973 |
| dewey-search | 355.8/0973 |
| dewey-sort | 3355.8 3973 |
| dewey-tens | 350 - Public administration and military science |
| discipline | Militärwissenschaft |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>05361nmm a2200601zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV043027040</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">151120s2013 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">0309284546</subfield><subfield code="9">0-309-28454-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780309284547</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-309-28454-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)843885487</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV043027040</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-1046</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1047</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">355.8/0973</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="110" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">National Research Council (U.S.)</subfield><subfield code="b">Board on Army Science and Technology</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Making the soldier decisive on future battlefields</subfield><subfield code="c">Committee on Making the Soldier Decisive on Future Battlefields, Board on Army Science and Technology, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Washington, D.C.</subfield><subfield code="b">National Academies Press</subfield><subfield code="c">2013</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="c">© 2013</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (xvi, 239 pages)</subfield><subfield code="b">colored illustrations</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (NAP, viewed May 21, 2013)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Summary. -- Introduction. -- Capabilities. -- Setting the conditions to achieve soldier and TSU overmatch. -- Achieving overmatch. -- Appendixes</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This study resulted from recognition by the U.S. Army that a great disparity exists between the decisive overmatch capability, relative to prospective adversaries, of major U.S. weapon systems (such as tanks, fighter aircraft, or nuclear submarines) and the relative vulnerability of dismounted soldiers when they are operating in small, detached units (squads). The increased reliance in recent Army deployments on soldiers operating in these tactical small units (TSUs), as well as the expanding responsibilities of ground forces in the future for missions that go beyond traditional combat, provided the incentive to ask what could be done to give dismounted soldiers and TSUs a credible degree of decisive overmatch in any of the anticipated future operational environments. The focus of this study was achieving decisive overmatch for the dismounted Soldier and tactical small unit (TSU) on future battlefields. </subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In particular, the committee was asked to determine the elements of overmatch capabilities necessary to achieve decisiveness, identify technical requirements for optimizing Soldiers and small units, identify near-, mid-, and far-term technologies for investment, and determine the relative importance of such investments. To examine the desired elements of decisive overmatch, Chapter 2 identifies capabilities needed for decisive overmatch by Soldiers and small units in dismounted infantry squad operations, including situational understanding, military effects (including lethal and nonlethal effects and stability actions), maneuverability, sustainability, and survivability. Chapter 3 then articulates the foundational capabilities needed to identify and implement potential solutions. Finally, Chapter 4 describes how to achieve overmatch by focusing on the five areas most likely to enable improvements in Soldier and TSU decisiveness. </subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The study will examine the applicability of systems engineering to soldiers and small units, as well as specific technology areas that are relevant to making soldiers decisive, particularly in conditions where we still take casualties today (movement to contact and chance encounters). Technology areas to be considered should include (but not be limited to) situational awareness, weapons, mobility, and protection, adaptation to battlefield environments (e.g., clothing, cooling), communications and networking, human dynamics (e.g., physical, cognitive, behavioral), and logistical support (e.g., medical aid, food, water, energy)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="1" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">United States / Army</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">United States</subfield><subfield code="b">Army</subfield><subfield code="x">Weapons systems</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">United States</subfield><subfield code="b">Army</subfield><subfield code="x">Planning</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Armed Forces / Planning</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Armed Forces / Weapons systems</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Combat survivability (Military engineering)</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Military planning</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Military research</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">HISTORY / Military / Other</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING / Military Science</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Military planning</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Combat survivability (Military engineering)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Military research</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="a">National Research Council (U.S.). Board on Army Science and Technology. Making the soldier decisive on future battlefields</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druckausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">0-309-28453-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druckausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">978-0-309-28453-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=867808</subfield><subfield code="x">Aggregator</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-028451694</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=867808</subfield><subfield code="l">FAW01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield><subfield code="q">FAW_PDA_EBA</subfield><subfield code="x">Aggregator</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=867808</subfield><subfield code="l">FAW02</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield><subfield code="q">FAW_PDA_EBA</subfield><subfield code="x">Aggregator</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | USA |
| geographic_facet | USA |
| id | DE-604.BV043027040 |
| illustrated | Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T07:15:22Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 0309284546 9780309284547 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-028451694 |
| oclc_num | 843885487 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-1046 DE-1047 |
| owner_facet | DE-1046 DE-1047 |
| physical | 1 online resource (xvi, 239 pages) colored illustrations |
| psigel | ZDB-4-EBA ZDB-4-EBA FAW_PDA_EBA |
| publishDate | 2013 |
| publishDateSearch | 2013 |
| publishDateSort | 2013 |
| publisher | National Academies Press |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | National Research Council (U.S.) Board on Army Science and Technology Verfasser aut Making the soldier decisive on future battlefields Committee on Making the Soldier Decisive on Future Battlefields, Board on Army Science and Technology, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences Washington, D.C. National Academies Press 2013 © 2013 1 online resource (xvi, 239 pages) colored illustrations txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (NAP, viewed May 21, 2013) Summary. -- Introduction. -- Capabilities. -- Setting the conditions to achieve soldier and TSU overmatch. -- Achieving overmatch. -- Appendixes This study resulted from recognition by the U.S. Army that a great disparity exists between the decisive overmatch capability, relative to prospective adversaries, of major U.S. weapon systems (such as tanks, fighter aircraft, or nuclear submarines) and the relative vulnerability of dismounted soldiers when they are operating in small, detached units (squads). The increased reliance in recent Army deployments on soldiers operating in these tactical small units (TSUs), as well as the expanding responsibilities of ground forces in the future for missions that go beyond traditional combat, provided the incentive to ask what could be done to give dismounted soldiers and TSUs a credible degree of decisive overmatch in any of the anticipated future operational environments. The focus of this study was achieving decisive overmatch for the dismounted Soldier and tactical small unit (TSU) on future battlefields. In particular, the committee was asked to determine the elements of overmatch capabilities necessary to achieve decisiveness, identify technical requirements for optimizing Soldiers and small units, identify near-, mid-, and far-term technologies for investment, and determine the relative importance of such investments. To examine the desired elements of decisive overmatch, Chapter 2 identifies capabilities needed for decisive overmatch by Soldiers and small units in dismounted infantry squad operations, including situational understanding, military effects (including lethal and nonlethal effects and stability actions), maneuverability, sustainability, and survivability. Chapter 3 then articulates the foundational capabilities needed to identify and implement potential solutions. Finally, Chapter 4 describes how to achieve overmatch by focusing on the five areas most likely to enable improvements in Soldier and TSU decisiveness. The study will examine the applicability of systems engineering to soldiers and small units, as well as specific technology areas that are relevant to making soldiers decisive, particularly in conditions where we still take casualties today (movement to contact and chance encounters). Technology areas to be considered should include (but not be limited to) situational awareness, weapons, mobility, and protection, adaptation to battlefield environments (e.g., clothing, cooling), communications and networking, human dynamics (e.g., physical, cognitive, behavioral), and logistical support (e.g., medical aid, food, water, energy) United States / Army fast United States Army Weapons systems United States Army Planning Armed Forces / Planning fast Armed Forces / Weapons systems fast Combat survivability (Military engineering) fast Military planning fast Military research fast HISTORY / Military / Other bisacsh TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING / Military Science bisacsh Military planning United States Combat survivability (Military engineering) Military research United States USA Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe National Research Council (U.S.). Board on Army Science and Technology. Making the soldier decisive on future battlefields Erscheint auch als Druckausgabe 0-309-28453-8 Erscheint auch als Druckausgabe 978-0-309-28453-0 http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=867808 Aggregator Volltext |
| spellingShingle | Making the soldier decisive on future battlefields Summary. -- Introduction. -- Capabilities. -- Setting the conditions to achieve soldier and TSU overmatch. -- Achieving overmatch. -- Appendixes This study resulted from recognition by the U.S. Army that a great disparity exists between the decisive overmatch capability, relative to prospective adversaries, of major U.S. weapon systems (such as tanks, fighter aircraft, or nuclear submarines) and the relative vulnerability of dismounted soldiers when they are operating in small, detached units (squads). The increased reliance in recent Army deployments on soldiers operating in these tactical small units (TSUs), as well as the expanding responsibilities of ground forces in the future for missions that go beyond traditional combat, provided the incentive to ask what could be done to give dismounted soldiers and TSUs a credible degree of decisive overmatch in any of the anticipated future operational environments. The focus of this study was achieving decisive overmatch for the dismounted Soldier and tactical small unit (TSU) on future battlefields. In particular, the committee was asked to determine the elements of overmatch capabilities necessary to achieve decisiveness, identify technical requirements for optimizing Soldiers and small units, identify near-, mid-, and far-term technologies for investment, and determine the relative importance of such investments. To examine the desired elements of decisive overmatch, Chapter 2 identifies capabilities needed for decisive overmatch by Soldiers and small units in dismounted infantry squad operations, including situational understanding, military effects (including lethal and nonlethal effects and stability actions), maneuverability, sustainability, and survivability. Chapter 3 then articulates the foundational capabilities needed to identify and implement potential solutions. Finally, Chapter 4 describes how to achieve overmatch by focusing on the five areas most likely to enable improvements in Soldier and TSU decisiveness. The study will examine the applicability of systems engineering to soldiers and small units, as well as specific technology areas that are relevant to making soldiers decisive, particularly in conditions where we still take casualties today (movement to contact and chance encounters). Technology areas to be considered should include (but not be limited to) situational awareness, weapons, mobility, and protection, adaptation to battlefield environments (e.g., clothing, cooling), communications and networking, human dynamics (e.g., physical, cognitive, behavioral), and logistical support (e.g., medical aid, food, water, energy) United States / Army fast United States Army Weapons systems United States Army Planning Armed Forces / Planning fast Armed Forces / Weapons systems fast Combat survivability (Military engineering) fast Military planning fast Military research fast HISTORY / Military / Other bisacsh TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING / Military Science bisacsh Military planning United States Combat survivability (Military engineering) Military research United States |
| title | Making the soldier decisive on future battlefields |
| title_auth | Making the soldier decisive on future battlefields |
| title_exact_search | Making the soldier decisive on future battlefields |
| title_full | Making the soldier decisive on future battlefields Committee on Making the Soldier Decisive on Future Battlefields, Board on Army Science and Technology, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences |
| title_fullStr | Making the soldier decisive on future battlefields Committee on Making the Soldier Decisive on Future Battlefields, Board on Army Science and Technology, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences |
| title_full_unstemmed | Making the soldier decisive on future battlefields Committee on Making the Soldier Decisive on Future Battlefields, Board on Army Science and Technology, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences |
| title_short | Making the soldier decisive on future battlefields |
| title_sort | making the soldier decisive on future battlefields |
| topic | United States / Army fast United States Army Weapons systems United States Army Planning Armed Forces / Planning fast Armed Forces / Weapons systems fast Combat survivability (Military engineering) fast Military planning fast Military research fast HISTORY / Military / Other bisacsh TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING / Military Science bisacsh Military planning United States Combat survivability (Military engineering) Military research United States |
| topic_facet | United States / Army United States Army Weapons systems United States Army Planning Armed Forces / Planning Armed Forces / Weapons systems Combat survivability (Military engineering) Military planning Military research HISTORY / Military / Other TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING / Military Science Military planning United States Military research United States USA |
| url | http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=867808 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT nationalresearchcouncilusboardonarmyscienceandtechnology makingthesoldierdecisiveonfuturebattlefields |