Expert evidence deficiencies in the judgments of the courts of the European Union and the European Court of Human Rights:
Questions of admissibility surrounding expert evidence have always bedevilled the judiciary. However, statutory language and rules of procedure, conscientiously interpreted and applied to the use of expert evidence, can go a long way towards achieving rectitude of decision where judgement requires k...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Buch |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Alphen aan den Rijn
Wolters Kluwer Law & Business
2014
|
Schriftenreihe: | European monographs
89 |
Schlagworte: | |
Zusammenfassung: | Questions of admissibility surrounding expert evidence have always bedevilled the judiciary. However, statutory language and rules of procedure, conscientiously interpreted and applied to the use of expert evidence, can go a long way towards achieving rectitude of decision where judgement requires knowledge not necessarily possessed by the jurists responsible for trying the case. In this remarkable work of analysis and commentary, George Cumming takes the position that the prominent international courts of Europe fail to follow their own rules of procedure in the use of expert opinion, thus potentially breaching the express right to a fair trial embodied within Article 6 (1) ECHR. |
Beschreibung: | Includes bibliographical references (pages 245-248) and index |
Beschreibung: | vii, 251 pages 25 cm |
ISBN: | 9789041141231 9041141235 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 cb4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV042954079 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
007 | t | ||
008 | 151028s2014 ne |||| 00||| eng d | ||
020 | |a 9789041141231 |9 978-90-411-4123-1 | ||
020 | |a 9041141235 |9 90-411-4123-5 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)884917289 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV042954079 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
044 | |a ne |c NL | ||
049 | |a DE-19 | ||
050 | 0 | |a KJC3762 | |
100 | 1 | |a Cumming, George |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Expert evidence deficiencies in the judgments of the courts of the European Union and the European Court of Human Rights |c George Cumming Of the Inner Temple, Barrister |
264 | 1 | |a Alphen aan den Rijn |b Wolters Kluwer Law & Business |c 2014 | |
300 | |a vii, 251 pages |c 25 cm | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 1 | |a European monographs |v 89 | |
500 | |a Includes bibliographical references (pages 245-248) and index | ||
520 | |a Questions of admissibility surrounding expert evidence have always bedevilled the judiciary. However, statutory language and rules of procedure, conscientiously interpreted and applied to the use of expert evidence, can go a long way towards achieving rectitude of decision where judgement requires knowledge not necessarily possessed by the jurists responsible for trying the case. In this remarkable work of analysis and commentary, George Cumming takes the position that the prominent international courts of Europe fail to follow their own rules of procedure in the use of expert opinion, thus potentially breaching the express right to a fair trial embodied within Article 6 (1) ECHR. | ||
650 | 7 | |a UE/CE Droit |2 eclas | |
650 | 7 | |a UE/CE Cour de justice |2 eclas | |
650 | 7 | |a Cour européenne des droits de l'homme |2 eclas | |
650 | 7 | |a Cours suprêmes |2 eclas | |
650 | 7 | |a Jugements |2 eclas | |
650 | 7 | |a Témoignages |2 eclas | |
650 | 7 | |a Expertises judiciaires |2 eclas | |
650 | 7 | |a UE/CE Traités |2 eclas | |
650 | 7 | |a Convention européenne des droits de l'homme |2 eclas | |
650 | 4 | |a Recht | |
650 | 4 | |a Evidence, Expert |z Europe | |
650 | 4 | |a Admissible evidence |z Europe | |
650 | 4 | |a Judgments |z Europe | |
650 | 4 | |a Fair trial |z Europe | |
650 | 4 | |a Law |z Europe |x Interpretation and construction | |
650 | 4 | |a Evidence, Expert |z North America | |
650 | 4 | |a Admissible evidence |z North America | |
650 | 4 | |a Judgments |z North America | |
650 | 4 | |a UE/CE Droit | |
650 | 4 | |a UE/CE Cour de justice | |
650 | 4 | |a Cour européenne des droits de l'homme | |
650 | 4 | |a Cours suprêmes | |
650 | 4 | |a Jugements | |
650 | 4 | |a Témoignages | |
650 | 4 | |a Expertises judiciaires | |
650 | 4 | |a UE/CE Traités | |
650 | 4 | |a Convention européenne des droits de l'homme | |
651 | 7 | |a Etats-Unis d'Amérique |2 eclas | |
651 | 7 | |a Canada |2 eclas | |
651 | 4 | |a Europa | |
651 | 4 | |a Kanada | |
651 | 4 | |a Nordamerika | |
651 | 4 | |a Etats-Unis d'Amérique | |
651 | 4 | |a Canada | |
830 | 0 | |a European monographs |v 89 |w (DE-604)BV006154863 |9 89 | |
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-028380114 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804175270641401856 |
---|---|
any_adam_object | |
author | Cumming, George |
author_facet | Cumming, George |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Cumming, George |
author_variant | g c gc |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV042954079 |
callnumber-first | K - Law |
callnumber-label | KJC3762 |
callnumber-raw | KJC3762 |
callnumber-search | KJC3762 |
callnumber-sort | KJC 43762 |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)884917289 (DE-599)BVBBV042954079 |
format | Book |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03156nam a2200745 cb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV042954079</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">151028s2014 ne |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9789041141231</subfield><subfield code="9">978-90-411-4123-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9041141235</subfield><subfield code="9">90-411-4123-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)884917289</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV042954079</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ne</subfield><subfield code="c">NL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">KJC3762</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cumming, George</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Expert evidence deficiencies in the judgments of the courts of the European Union and the European Court of Human Rights</subfield><subfield code="c">George Cumming Of the Inner Temple, Barrister</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Alphen aan den Rijn</subfield><subfield code="b">Wolters Kluwer Law & Business</subfield><subfield code="c">2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">vii, 251 pages</subfield><subfield code="c">25 cm</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">European monographs</subfield><subfield code="v">89</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references (pages 245-248) and index</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Questions of admissibility surrounding expert evidence have always bedevilled the judiciary. However, statutory language and rules of procedure, conscientiously interpreted and applied to the use of expert evidence, can go a long way towards achieving rectitude of decision where judgement requires knowledge not necessarily possessed by the jurists responsible for trying the case. In this remarkable work of analysis and commentary, George Cumming takes the position that the prominent international courts of Europe fail to follow their own rules of procedure in the use of expert opinion, thus potentially breaching the express right to a fair trial embodied within Article 6 (1) ECHR.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">UE/CE Droit</subfield><subfield code="2">eclas</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">UE/CE Cour de justice</subfield><subfield code="2">eclas</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Cour européenne des droits de l'homme</subfield><subfield code="2">eclas</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Cours suprêmes</subfield><subfield code="2">eclas</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Jugements</subfield><subfield code="2">eclas</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Témoignages</subfield><subfield code="2">eclas</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Expertises judiciaires</subfield><subfield code="2">eclas</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">UE/CE Traités</subfield><subfield code="2">eclas</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Convention européenne des droits de l'homme</subfield><subfield code="2">eclas</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Recht</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Evidence, Expert</subfield><subfield code="z">Europe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Admissible evidence</subfield><subfield code="z">Europe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Judgments</subfield><subfield code="z">Europe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Fair trial</subfield><subfield code="z">Europe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Law</subfield><subfield code="z">Europe</subfield><subfield code="x">Interpretation and construction</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Evidence, Expert</subfield><subfield code="z">North America</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Admissible evidence</subfield><subfield code="z">North America</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Judgments</subfield><subfield code="z">North America</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">UE/CE Droit</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">UE/CE Cour de justice</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Cour européenne des droits de l'homme</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Cours suprêmes</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Jugements</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Témoignages</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Expertises judiciaires</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">UE/CE Traités</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Convention européenne des droits de l'homme</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Etats-Unis d'Amérique</subfield><subfield code="2">eclas</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Canada</subfield><subfield code="2">eclas</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Europa</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Kanada</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Nordamerika</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Etats-Unis d'Amérique</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Canada</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">European monographs</subfield><subfield code="v">89</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV006154863</subfield><subfield code="9">89</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-028380114</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
geographic | Etats-Unis d'Amérique eclas Canada eclas Europa Kanada Nordamerika Etats-Unis d'Amérique Canada |
geographic_facet | Etats-Unis d'Amérique Canada Europa Kanada Nordamerika |
id | DE-604.BV042954079 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-07-10T07:13:37Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 9789041141231 9041141235 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-028380114 |
oclc_num | 884917289 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
owner_facet | DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
physical | vii, 251 pages 25 cm |
publishDate | 2014 |
publishDateSearch | 2014 |
publishDateSort | 2014 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Law & Business |
record_format | marc |
series | European monographs |
series2 | European monographs |
spelling | Cumming, George Verfasser aut Expert evidence deficiencies in the judgments of the courts of the European Union and the European Court of Human Rights George Cumming Of the Inner Temple, Barrister Alphen aan den Rijn Wolters Kluwer Law & Business 2014 vii, 251 pages 25 cm txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier European monographs 89 Includes bibliographical references (pages 245-248) and index Questions of admissibility surrounding expert evidence have always bedevilled the judiciary. However, statutory language and rules of procedure, conscientiously interpreted and applied to the use of expert evidence, can go a long way towards achieving rectitude of decision where judgement requires knowledge not necessarily possessed by the jurists responsible for trying the case. In this remarkable work of analysis and commentary, George Cumming takes the position that the prominent international courts of Europe fail to follow their own rules of procedure in the use of expert opinion, thus potentially breaching the express right to a fair trial embodied within Article 6 (1) ECHR. UE/CE Droit eclas UE/CE Cour de justice eclas Cour européenne des droits de l'homme eclas Cours suprêmes eclas Jugements eclas Témoignages eclas Expertises judiciaires eclas UE/CE Traités eclas Convention européenne des droits de l'homme eclas Recht Evidence, Expert Europe Admissible evidence Europe Judgments Europe Fair trial Europe Law Europe Interpretation and construction Evidence, Expert North America Admissible evidence North America Judgments North America UE/CE Droit UE/CE Cour de justice Cour européenne des droits de l'homme Cours suprêmes Jugements Témoignages Expertises judiciaires UE/CE Traités Convention européenne des droits de l'homme Etats-Unis d'Amérique eclas Canada eclas Europa Kanada Nordamerika Etats-Unis d'Amérique Canada European monographs 89 (DE-604)BV006154863 89 |
spellingShingle | Cumming, George Expert evidence deficiencies in the judgments of the courts of the European Union and the European Court of Human Rights European monographs UE/CE Droit eclas UE/CE Cour de justice eclas Cour européenne des droits de l'homme eclas Cours suprêmes eclas Jugements eclas Témoignages eclas Expertises judiciaires eclas UE/CE Traités eclas Convention européenne des droits de l'homme eclas Recht Evidence, Expert Europe Admissible evidence Europe Judgments Europe Fair trial Europe Law Europe Interpretation and construction Evidence, Expert North America Admissible evidence North America Judgments North America UE/CE Droit UE/CE Cour de justice Cour européenne des droits de l'homme Cours suprêmes Jugements Témoignages Expertises judiciaires UE/CE Traités Convention européenne des droits de l'homme |
title | Expert evidence deficiencies in the judgments of the courts of the European Union and the European Court of Human Rights |
title_auth | Expert evidence deficiencies in the judgments of the courts of the European Union and the European Court of Human Rights |
title_exact_search | Expert evidence deficiencies in the judgments of the courts of the European Union and the European Court of Human Rights |
title_full | Expert evidence deficiencies in the judgments of the courts of the European Union and the European Court of Human Rights George Cumming Of the Inner Temple, Barrister |
title_fullStr | Expert evidence deficiencies in the judgments of the courts of the European Union and the European Court of Human Rights George Cumming Of the Inner Temple, Barrister |
title_full_unstemmed | Expert evidence deficiencies in the judgments of the courts of the European Union and the European Court of Human Rights George Cumming Of the Inner Temple, Barrister |
title_short | Expert evidence deficiencies in the judgments of the courts of the European Union and the European Court of Human Rights |
title_sort | expert evidence deficiencies in the judgments of the courts of the european union and the european court of human rights |
topic | UE/CE Droit eclas UE/CE Cour de justice eclas Cour européenne des droits de l'homme eclas Cours suprêmes eclas Jugements eclas Témoignages eclas Expertises judiciaires eclas UE/CE Traités eclas Convention européenne des droits de l'homme eclas Recht Evidence, Expert Europe Admissible evidence Europe Judgments Europe Fair trial Europe Law Europe Interpretation and construction Evidence, Expert North America Admissible evidence North America Judgments North America UE/CE Droit UE/CE Cour de justice Cour européenne des droits de l'homme Cours suprêmes Jugements Témoignages Expertises judiciaires UE/CE Traités Convention européenne des droits de l'homme |
topic_facet | UE/CE Droit UE/CE Cour de justice Cour européenne des droits de l'homme Cours suprêmes Jugements Témoignages Expertises judiciaires UE/CE Traités Convention européenne des droits de l'homme Recht Evidence, Expert Europe Admissible evidence Europe Judgments Europe Fair trial Europe Law Europe Interpretation and construction Evidence, Expert North America Admissible evidence North America Judgments North America Etats-Unis d'Amérique Canada Europa Kanada Nordamerika |
volume_link | (DE-604)BV006154863 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cumminggeorge expertevidencedeficienciesinthejudgmentsofthecourtsoftheeuropeanunionandtheeuropeancourtofhumanrights |