Document production in international arbitration:
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Abschlussarbeit Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Alphen aan den Rijn
Wolters Kluwer
[2015]
|
| Schriftenreihe: | International arbitration law library
volume 33 |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| Beschreibung: | xxiii, 309 Seiten |
| ISBN: | 9789041151599 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a22000002cb4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV042943479 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20151116 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 151022s2015 m||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9789041151599 |9 978-90-411-5159-9 | ||
| 024 | 3 | |a 9789041151599 | |
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)894747721 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ415755786 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-19 | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Marghitola, Reto |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1060013673 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Document production in international arbitration |c Reto Marghitola |
| 264 | 1 | |a Alphen aan den Rijn |b Wolters Kluwer |c [2015] | |
| 264 | 4 | |c © 2015 | |
| 300 | |a xxiii, 309 Seiten | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 1 | |a International arbitration law library |v volume 33 | |
| 502 | |b Dissertation |c University of Zurich |d 2014 | ||
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Internationale Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit |0 (DE-588)4162055-0 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 655 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)4113937-9 |a Hochschulschrift |2 gnd-content | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Internationale Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit |0 (DE-588)4162055-0 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 830 | 0 | |a International arbitration law library |v volume 33 |w (DE-604)BV021465758 |9 33 | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m SWB Datenaustausch |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=028369876&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-028369876 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804175255192731648 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS XVII
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS XXIII
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION 1
§1.01 GREAT IMPORTANCE OF DOCUMENT PRODUCTION IN INTERNATIONAL
ARBITRATION 1
§1.02 UNRESOLVED PROBLEMS AND SUGGESTED SOLUTIONS 2
CHAPTER 2
DEFINITION OF DOCUMENT PRODUCTION AND DISTINCTION FROM OTHER TERMS 5
§2.01 DEFINITION OF DOCUMENT PRODUCTION 5
[A] DEFINITION OF DOCUMENT 5
[B] SEVERAL MEANINGS OF PRODUCTION 6
[C] DEFINITION OF DOCUMENT PRODUCTION 6
§2.02 DISTINCTION BETWEEN PROCEDURAL AND SUBSTANTIVE OBLIGATION 7
§2.03 DISTINCTION BETWEEN DOCUMENT PRODUCTION, DISCOVERY AND DISCLOSURE
8
[A] INTRODUCTION 8
[B] DISTINCTION BETWEEN DOCUMENT PRODUCTION AND DISCOVERY IN THE
US 9
[C] DISTINCTION BETWEEN DOCUMENT PRODUCTION AND DISCLOSURE IN
ENGLAND 9
[D] SUMMARY 10
CHAPTER 3
PURPOSE OF DOCUMENT PRODUCTION 11
§3.01 CLASH OF VIEWS IN CROSS-CULTURAL ARBITRATION 11
§3.02 THE COMMON LAW SEARCH FOR THE TRUTH 12
§3.03 CIVIL LAW APPROACH IS BASED ON THE BURDEN OF PROOF 14
§3.04 PURPOSE OF DOCUMENT PRODUCTION IN INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION 16
IX
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER 4
ARBITRAL TRIBUNALS BROAD DISCRETION 21
§4.01 INTRODUCTION 21
§4.02 BROAD DISCRETION GRANTED BY LEGISLATION 22
[A] POWER OF THE ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL TO ORDER DOCUMENT PRODUCTION 22
[B] MINIMUM STANDARDS IMPOSED BY LEGISLATION 23
[C] NO RULES ON PRIVILEGE IN ARBITRATION STATUTES 24
[D] SUMMARY 24
§4.03 DOCUMENT PRODUCTION AND INSTITUTIONAL ARBITRATION RULES 25
[A] INTRODUCTION 25
[B] BROAD DISCRETION GRANTED BY ICC, SWISS, VIENNA AND DIS RULES 25
[C] CONTROVERSY ABOUT THE INTERPRETATION OF THE UNCITRAL RULES 26
[D] BROAD DISCRETION GRANTED BY LCIA RULES 26
[E] EXCLUSION OF BROAD DOCUMENT PRODUCTION BY SCC AND SIAC RULES 27
[F] ICDR RULES PROVIDE SPECIFIC RULES 29
[G] REFORM PROPOSAL 30
§4.04 CONCLUSION 31
CHAPTER 5
INTERPRETATION OF THE IBA RULES 33
§5.01 INTRODUCTION 33
§5.02 OVERVIEW OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF DOCUMENT PRODUCTION 35
§5.03 THE CHALLENGE OF ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT PRODUCTION 35
§5.04 GENERAL COMMENTS ABOUT THE INTERPRETATION OF THE IBA RULES 36
§5.05 SPECIFICITY 37
[A] INTRODUCTION 37
[B] SPECIFIC DOCUMENTS 37
[C] NARROW AND SPECIFIC REQUESTED CATEGORY 39
[D] REQUESTS FOR ELECTRONIC DOCUMENTS 42
[E] OTHER GUIDELINES ON E-DOCUMENT PRODUCTION 45
[F] SUMMARY 47
§5.06 RELEVANCE AND MATERIALITY 47
[A] INTRODUCTION 47
[B] TWO LEGAL BASES 48
[C] DIFFERENT ORIGINS OF THE TWO REQUIREMENTS 48
[D] DIFFERENT THRESHOLDS OF RELEVANCE UNDER THE 1999 AND 2010 IBA
RULES 49
[E] DEFINITION OF MATERIALITY TO THE OUTCOME OF THE CASE 52
[F] OVERALL THRESHOLD IS THE SAME AS UNDER THE 1999 IBA RULES 54
[G] PRIMA FACIE RELEVANCE AND MATERIALITY 54
[H] BURDEN OF PROOF IS NOT A REQUIREMENT 55
[I] EXAMPLES OF MATERIAL AND IMMATERIAL DOCUMENTS 57
[J] MATERIALITY OF INTERNAL DOCUMENTS 58
[K] MATERIALITY OF METADATA 59
[L] SUMMARY 60
TABLE OF CONTENTS
§5.07 THE PROHIBITION OF FISHING EXPEDITIONS 61
§5.08 POSSESSION, CUSTODY OR CONTROL 64
[A] OVERVIEW OF REQUIREMENTS 64
[B] DEFINITION OF POSSESSION, CUSTODY OR CONTROL 64
[C] UNREASONABLE BURDEN FOR THE REQUESTING PARTY 68
[D] NO PRODUCTION OF PARTIES CORRESPONDENCE AND OF PUBLIC
DOCUMENTS 68
[E] NO IMPLICIT CONDITION THAT A PARTY SUBMITS ITS OWN EVIDENCE 69
[F] SUMMARY 69
§5.09 PRIVILEGES 70
[A] INTRODUCTION 70
[B] PROCEDURAL OR SUBSTANTIVE NATURE OF PRIVILEGES? 70
[C] DEFINITION OF PRIVILEGE IN INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION 74
[D] OVERVIEW ON THE CONTENT OF THE IBA RULES 74
[E] APPLICABLE LAW TO PRIVILEGES 76
[F] MOST FAVOURED NATION APPROACH 78
[G] LEGAL PROFESSIONAL PRIVILEGE UNDER US AND ENGLISH LAW 80
[H] LEGAL PROFESSIONAL PRIVILEGE UNDER SWISS AND GERMAN LAW 82
[I] COMPARATIVE OVERVIEW ON SETTLEMENT PRIVILEGE 85
[J] FURTHER TYPES OF PRIVILEGES 86
[K] WAIVER OF PRIVILEGES UNDER ENGLISH AND US LAW 86
[L] WAIVER OF PRIVILEGES UNDER GERMAN AND SWISS LAW 87
[M] SUMMARY 88
[N] COMMENTS ON THE CURRENT VERSION OF THE IBA RULES 88
§5.10 LEGAL IMPEDIMENT 90
§5.11 COMMERCIAL OR TECHNICAL CONFIDENTIALITY 90
[A] INTRODUCTION 90
[B] DISTINCTION BETWEEN CONFIDENTIALITY AND PRIVILEGES 91
[C] COMPLETE EXCLUSION OF EVIDENCE IS THE EXCEPTION 91
[D] DEFINITION OF TECHNICAL AND COMMERCIAL CONFIDENTIALITY 92
[E] COMPELLING GROUNDS TO EXCLUDE DOCUMENTS 93
[F] CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENTS 94
[G] OVERVIEW ON CONFIDENTIALITY MEASURES 94
[H] REDACTIONS 95
[I] CONFIDENTIALITY EXPERTS 95
[J] ONLY-COUNSEL REVIEW 96
[K] CLEAN TEAMS 97
[L] SUMMARY 97
§5.12 POLITICAL OR INSTITUTIONAL SENSITIVITY 97
§5.13 UNREASONABLE BURDEN 98
[A] PRODUCTION OF E-DOCUMENTS BEARS THE RISK OF A HIGH BURDEN 98
[B] DELICATE EXCLUSION OF MATERIAL DOCUMENTS 100
[C] DEFINITION OF AN UNREASONABLE BURDEN 101
[D] UNREASONABLE BURDEN OF RESTORING DATA FROM BACK-UP TAPES 102
[E] AN ESTIMATION OF TIME AND MONEY TO SUPPORT THE OBJECTION 104
XI
TABLE OF CONTENTS
[F] USE OF SAMPLING TO REDUCE THE BURDEN 104
[G] SUMMARY 104
§5.14 NON-EXISTENCE, LOSS AND DESTRUCTION OF DOCUMENTS 105
[A] INTRODUCTION 105
[B] NON-EXISTING DOCUMENTS 105
[C] LOST AND DESTROYED DOCUMENTS 107
[D] SUMMARY 110
§5.15 PROCEDURAL ECONOMY, PROPORTIONALITY, FAIRNESS AND EQUALITY 110
§5.16 NO DUTY TO SUBMIT ADVERSE DOCUMENTS BASED ON GOOD FAITH 112
§5.17 CONCLUSION 113
§5.18 OUTLOOK: IB A RULES SHOULD NOT BECOME A CODE 115
CHAPTER 6
DOCUMENT PRODUCTION STRATEGIES 117
§6.01 INTRODUCTION 117
§6.02 EARLY CONSIDERATION IS THE KEY FACTOR 117
§6.03 WHICH PARTY WILL BENEFIT FROM DOCUMENT PRODUCTION? 118
§6.04 SELECTION OF ARBITRATORS 119
§6.05 INFLUENCING THE PROCEDURAL RULES 120
§6.06 HOW TO FORMULATE DOCUMENT PRODUCTION REQUESTS 122
[A] INTRODUCTION 122
[B] COMMON LAW-STYLE REQUESTS ARE OVERLY AGGRESSIVE 122
[C] THE RISK OF A BOOMERANG EFFECT 122
[D] HOW TO REQUEST DOCUMENT PRODUCTION 123
§6.07 HOW TO ANSWER DOCUMENT PRODUCTION REQUESTS 124
§6.08 DOCUMENT PRODUCTION AND GUERRILLA TACTICS 124
§6.09 CONCLUSION 126
CHAPTER 7
THE EXPECTATIONS OF THE PARTIES 129
§7.01 INTRODUCTION 129
§7.02 COMMON EXPECTATIONS OF THE PARTIES 130
[A] GENERALLY RECOGNIZED CONCEPT IN INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION 130
[B] DEFINITION OF PARTIES EXPECTATIONS 130
[C] EX ANTE OR EX POST PARTIES EXPECTATIONS? 131
[D] DIFFICULTIES IN DETERMINING EXPECTATIONS OF GLOBAL COMPANIES 133
[E] IN WHICH CASES DO EXPECTATIONS OF THE PARTIES COINCIDE? 135
[F] SUMMARY 136
§7.03 LEGITIMATE EXPECTATIONS OF ONLY ONE PARTY ARE INSUFFICIENT 137
§7.04 NO DUTY OF ARBITRAL TRIBUNALS TO BALANCE DIFFERENT EXPECTATIONS
137
§7.05 PROCEDURAL NEUTRALITY 138
§7.06 DISCRETION OF THE ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL 139
§7.07 PRESUMED INTENT, HYPOTHETICAL BARGAIN AND IMPLIED TERMS 140
[A] INTRODUCTION 140
[B] PRESUMED INTENT OF THE PARTIES IN SOME CIVIL LAW COUNTRIES 141
XN
TABLE OF CONTENTS
[C] HYPOTHETICAL BARGAIN UNDER US LAW 143
[D] IMPLIED TERMS UNDER ENGLISH LAW 143
[E] WOULD THESE CONCEPTS ALLOW FILLING GAPS IN ARBITRATION
AGREEMENTS? 145
[F] NO APPLICATION OF CONTRACTUAL LAW OF SEAT OF ARBITRATION 146
[G] THE CONCEPTS ARE NOT INTERNATIONALLY RECOGNIZED 147
§7.08 CONCLUSION 148
CHAPTER 8
MODEL CLAUSES 149
§8.01 INTRODUCTION 149
§8.02 IMPERATIVE NEED FOR NEW SOLUTIONS 149
§8.03 GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS ON THE ESTABLISHMENT OF EVIDENTIARY RULES
151
[A] INTRODUCTION 151
[B] USE OF EVIDENTIARY RULES AS GUIDELINES 151
[C] DETAILED RULES INCREASE THE PREDICTABILITY OF PROCEDURAL DECISIONS
152
[D] INCLUSION OF A MODEL CLAUSE IN PROCEDURAL ORDER NO. 1 154
[E] SUMMARY 155
§8.04 CASE-BY-CASE MODIFICATIONS OF THE IBA RULES AND THE ICDR RULES 155
§8.05 MODEL CLAUSES FOR PARTIES WITH CIVIL LAW EXPECTATIONS 156
[A] INTRODUCTION 156
[B] EXCLUSION OF DUTY TO PRODUCE INTERNAL DOCUMENTS 157
[C] EXCLUSION OF REQUESTS FOR CATEGORIES OF DOCUMENTS 159
[D] EXCLUSION OF INTERNAL DOCUMENTS AND CATEGORIES OF DOCUMENTS 159
[E] LIMITATION OF NUMBER OF DOCUMENT PRODUCTION REQUESTS? 160
[F] SUMMARY 160
§8.06 MODEL CLAUSES FOR PARTIES WITH COMMON LAW EXPECTATIONS 161
§8.07 MODEL CLAUSES FOR PARTIES EXPECTING TYPICAL ARBITRATION
PROCEEDINGS 162
[A] INTRODUCTION 162
[B] EXCLUSION OF SEARCH TERMS AND DUTY TO PRESERVE DOCUMENTS 163
[C] INCLUSION OF SEARCH TERMS AND DUTY TO PRESERVE DOCUMENTS 165
[D] SUMMARY 165
§8.08 MODEL CLAUSE FOR PRIVILEGES 166
[A] A HIGH MINIMUM STANDARD FOR PRIVILEGE 166
[B] GOAL OF MODEL CLAUSE 7 166
[C] THE REQUIREMENTS OF MODEL CLAUSE 7 167
[D] THE NEED FOR A PRIVILEGE FOR IN-HOUSE COUNSEL 167
[E] NO RULE ON INADVERTENT DISCLOSURE NEEDED 167
§8.09 CONTROVERSIAL MODEL CLAUSES 168
[A] INTRODUCTION 168
[B] PROBLEMATIC APPLICATION OF THE US FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL
PROCEDURE 168
[C] COMPLETE EXCLUSION OF DOCUMENT PRODUCTION 169
[D] SUMMARY 170
§8.10 CONCLUSION 170
XIN
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER 9
SANCTIONS 173
§9.01 INTRODUCTION 173
§9.02 ADVERSE INFERENCES 174
[A] INTRODUCTION 174
[B] ARBITRATORS AUTHORITY TO DRAW ADVERSE INFERENCES 174
[C] CONTENT OF ARTICLE 9(5) IB A RULES 175
[D] NO STRICT REQUIREMENTS FOR DRAWING ADVERSE INFERENCES 175
[E] FREE ASSESSMENT OF EVIDENCE 178
[F] IT IS NOT A QUESTION OF FAULT 178
[G] NO REQUEST TO DRAW ADVERSE INFERENCES NEEDED 178
[H] LEGAL BACKGROUND CANNOT JUSTIFY NON-COMPLIANCE 179
[I] CONCLUSION 179
§9.03 ALLOCATION OF COSTS 179
§9.04 NO MONETARY PENALTIES IN MOST COUNTRIES 180
§9.05 NO SANCTIONS AGAINST PARTY REPRESENTATIVES 181
§9.06 CONCLUSION 182
CHAPTER 10
DOCUMENT PRODUCTION ORDERS AND ANNULMENT AND ENFORCEMENT OF THE AWARD
185
§10.01 INTRODUCTION 185
§10.02 RISK OF ANNULMENT OR NON-ENFORCEMENT IS REMOTE IN MOST COUNTRIES
187
§10.03 THE INFLUENCE OF GROUNDS FOR ANNULMENT IN ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS
189
§10.04 LIMITED HARMONIZATION OF GROUNDS FOR ANNULMENT AND
NON-ENFORCEMENT 190
[A] HARMONIZATION BY UNCITRAL MODEL LAW AND THE NEW YORK
CONVENTION 190
[B] GROWING IMPORTANCE OF INTERNATIONAL MINIMUM STANDARDS 190
[C] DOCUMENT PRODUCTION AND GROUNDS FOR ANNULMENT AND
NON-ENFORCEMENT 194
§10.05 FISHING EXPEDITIONS AND PUBLIC POLICY IN CIVIL LAW COUNTRIES 195
[AJ INTRODUCTION 195
[B] INTENSE DEBATE ON FISHING EXPEDITIONS IN GERMANY 196
FC] CONTROVERSIAL DISCUSSION OF PROCEDURAL PUBLIC POLICY IN AUSTRIA 201
[D] THE ITALIAN VIEWPOINT ON DISCOVERY AND PUBLIC POLICY 201
[E] FISHING EXPEDITIONS IN ARBITRATION DO NOT VIOLATE SWISS PUBLIC
POLICY 202
§10.06 DOCUMENT PRODUCTION AND THE PARTY S ABILITY TO PRESENT ITS CASE
203
[A] INTRODUCTION 203
[B] DOCUMENT PRODUCTION AND DUE PROCESS IN THE UNITED STATES 205
[C] DOCUMENT PRODUCTION AND THE RIGHT TO BE HEARD IN AUSTRIA 207
[D] DOCUMENT PRODUCTION AND THE RIGHT TO BE HEARD IN SWITZERLAND 209
§10.07 PRIVILEGES AND THE RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL 213
§10.08 ADVERSE INFERENCES DO NOT VIOLATE DUE PROCESS 214
XIV
TABLE OF CONTENTS
§10.09 DOCUMENT PRODUCTION AND EQUAL TREATMENT OF THE PARTIES IN
SWITZERLAND 215
[A] INTRODUCTION 215
[B] LEGAL BASES UNDER THE PILA AND THE NEW YORK CONVENTION 215
[C] CASE LAW OF THE SWISS FEDERAL TRIBUNAL 217
[D] DISTINCTION BETWEEN RIGHT OF EQUAL TREATMENT AND RIGHT TO BE
HEARD 217
[E] CONTENT OF THE RIGHT OF EQUAL TREATMENT 218
§10.10 CONCEALED DOCUMENTS AND AWARDS OBTAINED BY FRAUD 218
[A] INTRODUCTION 218
[B] 68 (2) (G) ARBITRATION ACT 1996 219
[C] ELEKTRIM SA V. VIVENDI UNIVERSAL SA 219
[D] PROFILATI ITALIA SRI V. PAINEWEBBER INC. 220
[E] GATER ASSETS LIMITED V. NAK NAFTOGAZ UKRAINIY 220
[F] CHANTIERS DE I ATLANTIQUE S.A. V. GAZTRANSPORT & TECHNIGAZ S. AS.
222
[G] THREE LEGAL BASES UNDER SWISS LAW 223
[H] DISCOVERY OF DECISIVE EVIDENCE AS GROUND FOR REVISION UNDER
SWISS LAW 225
[I] SUMMARY 226
§10.11 DOCUMENT PRODUCTION AND VIOLATIONS OF THE AGREED PROCEDURE 227
[A] VIOLATIONS OF THE AGREED PROCEDURE UNDER THE NEW YORK
CONVENTION 227
[B] VIOLATIONS OF THE AGREED PROCEDURE UNDER NATIONAL LAWS ON
ANNULMENT 227
[C] TYPES OF PROCEDURAL AGREEMENTS ON DOCUMENT PRODUCTION 228
[D] LIMITED NUMBER OF PROCEDURAL AGREEMENTS ON DOCUMENT
PRODUCTION 230
[E] SUMMARY 231
§10.12 THE OLG FRANKFURT CASE AND ITS LESSONS 231
[A] ANNULMENT DECISION OF THE HIGHER REGIONAL COURT OF FRANKFURT 231
[B] LESSONS FOR POST-M & A DISPUTES 235
[C] LESSONS FOR THE CONDUCT OF ARBITRAL PROCEEDINGS 236
[D] LESSONS ON PRIMACY OF PARTY AUTONOMY 236
[E] DISTINCTION BETWEEN PROCEDURAL ORDERS AND PARTIES AGREEMENTS 237
[F] OLG FRANKFURT CASE ILLUSTRATES RISKS OF RIGID RULES 238
[G] CRITERION OF PROCEDURE NOT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PARTIES
AGREEMENT 239
[H] CRITERION OF EFFECT ON THE OUTCOME OF THE ARBITRAL PROCEEDINGS 242
[I] SUMMARY OF LESSONS FROM OLG FRANKFURT CASE 242
§10.13 WAIVER OF PROCEDURAL OBJECTIONS 243
§10.14 RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SETTING ASIDE AND ENFORCEMENT PROCEEDINGS
245
§10.15 CONCLUSION 249
XV
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER 11
CONCLUSION 251
BIBLIOGRAPHY 255
TABLE OF CASES 283
TABLE OF LEGISLATION 291
INDEX 295
XVI
|
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| author | Marghitola, Reto |
| author_GND | (DE-588)1060013673 |
| author_facet | Marghitola, Reto |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Marghitola, Reto |
| author_variant | r m rm |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV042943479 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)894747721 (DE-599)BSZ415755786 |
| format | Thesis Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01511nam a22003732cb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV042943479</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20151116 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">151022s2015 m||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9789041151599</subfield><subfield code="9">978-90-411-5159-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9789041151599</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)894747721</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BSZ415755786</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Marghitola, Reto</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1060013673</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Document production in international arbitration</subfield><subfield code="c">Reto Marghitola</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Alphen aan den Rijn</subfield><subfield code="b">Wolters Kluwer</subfield><subfield code="c">[2015]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="c">© 2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xxiii, 309 Seiten</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">International arbitration law library</subfield><subfield code="v">volume 33</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="502" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">Dissertation</subfield><subfield code="c">University of Zurich</subfield><subfield code="d">2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Internationale Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4162055-0</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4113937-9</subfield><subfield code="a">Hochschulschrift</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd-content</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Internationale Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4162055-0</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">International arbitration law library</subfield><subfield code="v">volume 33</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV021465758</subfield><subfield code="9">33</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">SWB Datenaustausch</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=028369876&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-028369876</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| genre | (DE-588)4113937-9 Hochschulschrift gnd-content |
| genre_facet | Hochschulschrift |
| id | DE-604.BV042943479 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T07:13:23Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9789041151599 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-028369876 |
| oclc_num | 894747721 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
| owner_facet | DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
| physical | xxiii, 309 Seiten |
| publishDate | 2015 |
| publishDateSearch | 2015 |
| publishDateSort | 2015 |
| publisher | Wolters Kluwer |
| record_format | marc |
| series | International arbitration law library |
| series2 | International arbitration law library |
| spelling | Marghitola, Reto Verfasser (DE-588)1060013673 aut Document production in international arbitration Reto Marghitola Alphen aan den Rijn Wolters Kluwer [2015] © 2015 xxiii, 309 Seiten txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier International arbitration law library volume 33 Dissertation University of Zurich 2014 Internationale Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit (DE-588)4162055-0 gnd rswk-swf (DE-588)4113937-9 Hochschulschrift gnd-content Internationale Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit (DE-588)4162055-0 s DE-604 International arbitration law library volume 33 (DE-604)BV021465758 33 SWB Datenaustausch application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=028369876&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| spellingShingle | Marghitola, Reto Document production in international arbitration International arbitration law library Internationale Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit (DE-588)4162055-0 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4162055-0 (DE-588)4113937-9 |
| title | Document production in international arbitration |
| title_auth | Document production in international arbitration |
| title_exact_search | Document production in international arbitration |
| title_full | Document production in international arbitration Reto Marghitola |
| title_fullStr | Document production in international arbitration Reto Marghitola |
| title_full_unstemmed | Document production in international arbitration Reto Marghitola |
| title_short | Document production in international arbitration |
| title_sort | document production in international arbitration |
| topic | Internationale Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit (DE-588)4162055-0 gnd |
| topic_facet | Internationale Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit Hochschulschrift |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=028369876&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| volume_link | (DE-604)BV021465758 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT marghitolareto documentproductionininternationalarbitration |