Cesty moravské paleolitické archeologie v období Československé republiky:
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | Czech |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Brno
Moravské Zemské Muzeum
2014
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis Literaturverzeichnis Abstract |
| Beschreibung: | Zsfassung in engl. Sprache u.d.T.: The path of Moravian Palaeolithic archaeology at the time of the Czechoslovak republic 1918 - 1938 |
| Beschreibung: | 339 S. zahlr. Ill. Kt. |
| ISBN: | 9788070284223 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV042530918 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20170213 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 150428s2014 ab|| |||| 00||| cze d | ||
| 020 | |a 9788070284223 |9 978-80-7028-422-3 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)910477029 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV042530918 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a cze | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-29 | ||
| 084 | |a 7,41 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Kostrhun, Petr |d 1979- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)136724183 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Cesty moravské paleolitické archeologie v období Československé republiky |c Petr Kostrhun |
| 264 | 1 | |a Brno |b Moravské Zemské Muzeum |c 2014 | |
| 300 | |a 339 S. |b zahlr. Ill. Kt. | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Zsfassung in engl. Sprache u.d.T.: The path of Moravian Palaeolithic archaeology at the time of the Czechoslovak republic 1918 - 1938 | ||
| 648 | 7 | |a Geschichte 1918-1938 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Paläolithikum |0 (DE-588)4140148-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Archäologie |0 (DE-588)4002827-6 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 7 | |a Tschechoslowakei |0 (DE-588)4078435-6 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 651 | 7 | |a Mähren |0 (DE-588)4074432-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Tschechoslowakei |0 (DE-588)4078435-6 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Mähren |0 (DE-588)4074432-2 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Paläolithikum |0 (DE-588)4140148-7 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |a Archäologie |0 (DE-588)4002827-6 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 4 | |a Geschichte 1918-1938 |A z |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=027965143&sequence=000004&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=027965143&sequence=000005&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Literaturverzeichnis |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=027965143&sequence=000006&line_number=0003&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Abstract |
| 940 | 1 | |n oe | |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 370.9 |e 22/bsb |f 0904 |g 4371 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 930.1 |e 22/bsb |f 09012 |g 4371 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 930.1 |e 22/bsb |f 0904 |g 4371 |
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-027965143 | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1813276355367796736 |
|---|---|
| adam_text |
OBSAH
1. Üvodem.7
2. Vymezeni problému - poznâni dëjin mezivâlecné archéologie na Moravë.9
2.1. Historické clenëni archeologického poznâni v ceskych zemich ve 20. stoleti.14
3. Pied „prehistorickou revolud“ - poznâni paleolitu na prelomu 19. a 20. stoleti.16
3.1. Paleoliticky vyzkum v Cechâch a na Moravë na prelomu 19. a 20. stoleti.27
4. Archéologie mezi svëtovymi vâlkami.41
4.1. Evropskâ archeologickâ teorie prvnich ctyr desetileti 20. stoleti.41
4.1.1. Difusionismus, migracionismus, kulturnë-historickâ archéologie a neoevolucionismus
(Gustaf Kossinna, Vere Gordon Childe).41
4.1.2. Archéologie v Sovëtském svazu ve 20.-30. letech 20. stoleti.51
4.1.3. Mezivâlecnâ archéologie ve Spojenÿch stâtech americkÿch.56
4.1.4. Funkcionalismus (John Grahame Douglas Clark).58
4.2. Rozvoj metodiky archeologického prùzkumu v mezivâlecném obdobi.60
4.3. Pfedstavy o paleolitickém clovëku se mëni - mozaika evropského paleolitického vyzkumu
v mezivâlecném obdobi.;.66
5. Moravskâ paleolitickâ archéologie v letech 1918-1938.81
5.1. Odraz archeologickych teoriiprvnich ctyr desetileti 20. stoleti v moravské paleolitické archeologii.81
5.2. ïnstitucionâlni zâzemi a prâvni rdmec archéologie na Moravë v letech 1918-1938.92
6. Hlavni predstavitelé paleolitické archéologie na Moravë mezi svëtovymi vâlkami.103
6.1. Jan Knies (1860-1937).103
6.1.1. Kniesovo muzeum Moravského krasu.104
6.1.2. Generacni vymëna: spor Jana Kniese a Karla Absolona.112
6.1.3. Prodej sbirek do Moravského zemského muzea a brnënska léta.113
6.1.4. Kniesova syntéza moravského paleolitu.119
6.2. Antonin Telicka (1866-1925). 128
6.3. Karel Absolon (1877-1960).131
6.3.1. „Diluviâlni Pompeje“ v Dolnich Vëstonicich.138
6.3.2. Zahranicni kontakty Karla Absolona.150
6.3.3. „Papez prehistoric“ abbé Henri Breuil na Moravë.154
6.3.4. Predmosti u Prerova - ucebnice moravského paleolitu.159
6.3.5. Nejbohatsi stanice stredoevropského magdalénienu - jeskynë Pekârna.162
6.3.6. Bÿci skâla a Absolonova koncepce paleolitu.166
6.3.7. Expozice Anthropos na Vÿstavë soudobé kultury v Brnë.169
6.3.8. V dobâch druhé svëtové vâlky.174
6.4. Josef Skutil (1904-1965).182
6.5. Innocenc Ladislav Cervinka (1869-1952).188
6.6. Alois Stehlïk (1877-1945).191
6.7. Karel Zapletal (1903-1972).192
6.8. Hugo Sâhka (1859-1939).193
6.9. Jan Folprecht (1873-1952).194
6.10. Dalsi badatelé ve vyzkumu moravského paleolitu.195
6.11. Moravsti nèmecti badatelé ve vyzkumu paleolitu.200
6.11.1. Franz Cupik (1897-1962).203
6.11.2. Hans Mohr (1882-1967).204
6.11.3. Hans Freising (1905-1977). 204
6.11.4. Rudolf Czizek (1878-1937).205
6.11.5. Karl Jüttner (1883-1959).206
6.11.7. Karl Schirmeisen (1868-1958).207
7. Nàstin paleolitické archéologie v sousednich zemich.209
7.1. Videhské badatelské centrum ajeho vliv na Moravè.209
7.2. Rozvoj polské paleolitické archéologie v mezivâlecném obdobi.214
7.2.1. Exkurs: Reflexe polské paleolitické archéologie u ceskych badatelû - vztahy Karla Absolona
s polskÿmi archeology.219
7.3. Paleolitickâ archéologie na Slovensku.229
8. Zavërem.234
9. Pouzitâ Literatura. 238
.263
272
Summary.
Priloha I. - Dëjiny vyzkumû moravského diluvia se soupisem literatury (Jan Knies)
Priloha IL - Soupis prijaté korespondence z pozüstalosti Karla Absolona.
284
CESTY MORAVSKÉ PALEOLITICKÉ ARCHEOLOGIE V OBDOBÎ CESKOSLOVENSKÉ REPUBUKY
9. POUZlTÄ LITERATURA
ABRAMOWICZ, A. 1991: Historia archeologii polskiej - XIX i XX wiek. Lodz.
ABRAMOWICZ, A. 1992: Historia archeologii polskiej - Poczqtki. Lodz.
ABSOLON, K. 1900a: Über zwei neuen Collembolen aus den Höhlen des österreichischen Occupationsge-
bietes, Zoologischer Anzeiger 23,427-431.
ABSOLON, K. 1900b: Vÿzkum jeskyn francouzskych Dr. Armandem Viréem, Sbornik Ceské spolecnosti ze-
mévêdné 6,119-121.
ABSOLON, K. 1903: Untersuchungen über Apterygoten auf Grund der Sammlungen des Wienner Hof-
museums, Annalen des k. k. naturhistorischen Hofmuseums 18,91-111.
ABSOLON, K. 1904: Propasf Macocha na Moravë. Die vfzkumnfch vypravzroku 1901 a 1903. Praha.
ABSOLON, K. 1905-1911 : Kras moravsky ajeho podzemni svët. Monografie krasovéhofenoménu v devonskych
vapenckh planiny Drahanské. Praha.
ABSOLON, K. 1909: ProbUm podzemnkh tokü Punkvy v dëjinném svém vyvoji od stoleti XVII. do let 80tych
minulého stoleti. Prostëjov.
ABSOLON, K. 1918: Pfedmost. Eine Mamutjäger-Station in Mähren, Sonderabdruck aus Klaatsch-Heilborn:
Der Werdegang der Menschheit und die Entstehung der Kultur 1918,357-373. Berlin.
ABSOLON, K. 1926:0 studijni cestë po krasech Francouzskych, Sbornik zemëpisnych praci vënovanych Prof.
Vdclavu Svamberovi 1926,105-114. Praha.
ABSOLON, Ch. 1927a: Les grandes amphipodes aveugles dans les grottes balkaniques.
A.F.A.S., Compte rendu au Congrès de Constantine 1927 de lAssociation Française pour ÏAvancement des
Sciences, 13-17 avril 1927, Constantine (Alger), 290-295. Paris.
ABSOLON, Ch. 1927b: LAurignacien très ancien ou pseudo-moustérien en Moravie.
A.F.A.S., Compte rendu au Congrès de Constantine 1927 de lAssociation Française pour lAvancement des
Sciences, 13-17 avril 1927, Constantine (Alger), 321-327. Paris.
ABSOLON, K. 1927c: LAurignacien très ancien ou Pseudomoustérien en Moravie, Compte rendu au Congrès
de Constantine, 290-295. Paris.
ABSOLON, K. 1929a: New fmds of fossil human skeletons in Moravia, Anthropologie 7,79-89.
ABSOLON, K. 1929b: Palaeolithickâ cesta do severni Afriky a na Saharu, Priroda 22,192-196.
ABSOLON, K. 1930: Cesta na severospanëlskou palaeolithickou stanici Pindal, Priroda 23,50-53,
ABSOLON, K. 1933a: O pravé podstatë palaeolithickÿch industrii ze Sipky a Certovy diry na Moravë,
Anthropologie XI, 253-272. Praha.
ABSOLON, K. 1933b: Sir Arthur Keith o fossilnich lidech na Moravë, Priroda 26-8,209-217; 26-9:241-247.
ABSOLON, K. 1935: Otaslavice, eine neue große palaeolithische Station in Mähren mit Quarzitaurignacien.
Versuch einer systematisch typologischen Bestimmung der Steinartefakte, Studien aus dem Gebiete der
allgemeinen Karstforschung, der wissenschaftlichen Höhlenkunde, der Eiszeitforschung und den
Nachbargebieten, Palaeoethnol. Ser. (C) 4. Brünn.
ABSOLON, K. 1936: Über Grossformen des Quarzitischen Aurignaciens derpalaeolithischen Station Ondratice
in Mähren. Typologie der sogenannten „Gigantolithen“. Brno.
ABSOLON, K. 1937: Les résultats des nouvelles recherches paléolithiques en Moravie. Actes du XVIe Congrès
international dAnthropologie et dArchéologie préhistorique de Bruxelles 1935, VIe Assemblée générale de
l’Institut international d’anthropologie, Bruxelles, 1-8 septembre 1935,434-444. Bruxelles.
ABSOLON, K. 1938a: Vyzkum diluviâlni stanice lovcù mamutû v Dolnich Vêstonidch na Pavlovskych kopcich
na Moravë. Pracovni zprâva zaprvni rok 1924, Studien aus dem Gebiete der allgemeinen Karstforschung,
der wissenschaftlichen Höhlenkunde, der Eiszeitforschung und den Nachbargebieten, Palaeoethnol. Ser.
(C) 6. Brünn.
ABSOLON, K. 1938b: Die Erforschung der diluvialen Mammutjägerstation von Unter- Wisternitz an den
Pollauer Bergen in Mähren. Arbeitsbericht über das erste Grabungsjahr 1924, Studien aus dem Gebiete der
238
CESTY MORAVSKÉ PALEOUTICKÊ ARCHEOLOGIE V OBDOBÎ CESKOSLOVENSKÉ REPUBLIKY
allgemeinen Karstforschung, der wissenschaftlichen Höhlenkunde, der Eiszeitforschung und den
Nachbargebieten, Palaeoethnol. Ser. (C) 7. Brünn.
ABSOLON, K. 1938c: Die Erforschung der diluvialen Mammutjägerstation von Unter- Wisternitz an den
Pollauer Bergen in Mähren. Arbeitsbericht über das zweite Jahr 1925. Studien aus dem Gebiete der allge-
meinen Karstforschung, der wissenschaftlichen Höhlenkunde, der Eiszeitforschung und den Nachbarge-
bieten, Palaeoethnol. Ser. (C) 9. Brünn.
ABSOLON, K. 1938d: Zprâvy osobni a spolkové - Eduard Alfred Martel, Pfiroda 31-8,234-237.
ABSOLON, K. 1939a: Palaeonthologickÿ üstav university v Upsale, Pfiroda 32-1,1-7.
ABSOLON, K. 1939b: Senèze, klassické nalezistë z horniho pliocénu ve Francii, Pfiroda 32,126-150.
ABSOLON, K. 1942: Zàsady morfologického urcovâni kamennych nastrojü, Pfiroda 35,57-69.
ABSOLON, K. 1943: Dr. Ales Hrdlicka, Pfiroda 36-3,65-75.
ABSOLON, K. 1945a: Vyzkum diluvialni stanice lovcü mamutü v Dolnich Vestonicich na Pavlovskych kopcich
na Moravè. Pracovni zpräva za tfeti rok 1926. Brno.
ABSOLON, K. 1945b: Prehistoricky vyzkumjeskynë By ci skâla na Moravè na srovnâvacim zâkladè. III. kriticky
pfispëvek ku poznânipraaurignacienu. Brno.
ABSOLON, K. 1945c: Jaroslav V. Stejskal 124. dubna 1945 - Dr. Alois Stehlik t 27. dubna 1945. Pfiroda 37-9,
292-293.
ABSOLON, K. 1947a: Kamenné paleolitické nâstroje z Predmosti ve sbirkâch hanâckého mëstského muzea
v Holesovë. Tvaroslovnâ analysa na srovnâvacim podkladë, Pfiroda 39-1,22-32.
ABSOLON, K. 1947b: Paleoethnologickâ stavba velikÿch stredoevropskych diluviâlnich Stanic, Pfiroda 40/1,
3-7,25-29 a 40/2,25-29.
ABSOLON, K. 1949: Moravia in Palaeolithic Times, American Journal of Archaeology 53,19-28.
ABSOLON, K. 1957: Recherches d’ethnographie préhistorique dans les stations diluviales de Moravie, Mé-
langes Pittard, Brive, 5-12. Chastrusse.
ABSOLON, K. 1960: Typologische Revision der Steinindustrie aus der palaeolithischen Station Gudenus -
Höhle in Österreich, Congress int. des sciences anthrop. et ethnol. - Compte-rendu de la 3e session, Bruxelles
1958:1-3. Tervuren.
ABSOLON, K. 1970: Moravsky kras 1,2. Praha.
ABSOLON, K. - CZIZEK, R. 1926: Palaeolitickÿ vyzkum jeskynë Pekârny na Moravè. Prvni zpräva, Acta
Musei Moraviae XXIV, 1-59.
ABSOLON, K. - CZIZEK, R. 1927: Palaeolitickÿ vyzkum jeskynë Pekârny na Moravè. Druhâ zpräva za rok
1926, Acta Musei Moraviae XXV, 112-201.
ABSOLON, K. - CZIZEK, R. 1932: Palaeolitickÿ vyzkum jeskynë Pekârny na Moravè. Tfeti predbëznâ zpräva
za rok 1927. Acta Musei Moraviae XXVI-XXVII, 479-598.
ABSOLON, K. - KLIMA, B. 1977: Pfedmosti, ein Mammutjägerplatz in Mähren. Praha.
ABSOLON, K. - SŸKORA, J. 1909: Moravsky kras. Album fotografickfch pohledù z krasu, doprovâzené
sedmijazycnym üvodem. Cesky zemsky Svaz pro povzneseni nâvstëvy cizincû na Moravë a ve Slezsku.
Brno.
ABSOLON, K. - ZAPLETAL, K. - SKUTIL, J. - STEHLIK, A. 1933: Bericht der Cechoslovakischen Subkom-
mission der „The internationla Commission for the Study of the fossil Man“ bei den internationalen geolo-
gischen Kongressen. Anthropos 1. Brno.
ABSOLONOVÂ, V. 1975: Pfednäska pro jubilejni zasedäni „Society of Woman Geographers've Washingtonu
dne 3. kvëtna 1975. Nepubl. strojopis., archiv Üstavu Anthropos MZM. Brno.
ADÂMEK, Fr. 1939: Nové nalezistë fosilnich kosti v Obfanech u Brna, Pfiroda 32,40-41.
ADÄMEK, Fr. 1971: Dr. Jindfich Wankel a moravskâ prehistorie, Sbornik praci okresniho vlastivëdného musea
v Blansku (k vyroci 150. let od narozeni MUDr. Jindficha Wankla), 44-70.
ANONYMUS 1926-1927: Institut International d’Anthropologie. II. Session Prague 14-21 Septembre 1924.
Pafiz 1926. Str. 647, Pamàtky archeologické 35,295.
ANONYMUS 1936: XVIe Congrès International d’Anthropologie et d’Archéologie Préhistorique. VIe Assem-
blée Générale LTnstitut International dAntropologie Bruxelles 1-8 Septembre 1935. Bruxelles 1936.
239
CESTY MORAVSKÉ PALEOLITICKÊ ARCHEOLOGIE V OBDOBl CESKOSLOVENSKÊ REPUBLIKY
ANONYMUS 1939: XVIIe Congrès International d’Anthropologie et dArchéologie Préhistorique. VIIe Session
L’Institut International d’Antropologie, Bucarest 1-8 Septembre 1937. Bucarest 1939.
ANONYMUS 1960: Zivotni dilo geologa prof. PhDr. Karla Jüttnera, Acta Musei Moraviae sei. nat. 45,
269-274.
ANTONIEWICZ, Wl. 1925: Eneolityczne groby szkieletowe i ziemianki mieszkalne w Nowym Darominie
(pow. Sandomierski, Maiopolska), Obzorpraehistoricky IV (Niederlûv sbornik), 243-273.
ANTONIEWICZ, Wt. 1936: Trzy wazne kongresy miçdzynarodowe, Swiatowit XVI, 207-254.
ARNOLD, B. 1990: The Past as Propaganda. Totalitarian Archaeology in Nazi Germany, Antiquity 64,
464-478.
ARNOLD, B. 1998: The power of the past: nationalism and archaeology in 20th century Germany, Archaeolo-
giaPolona wl. 35-36:1997-1998,237-154.
ARNOLD, B. 2006: „Arierdämmerung“: Race and Archaeology in Nazi germany, World Archaeology 38,
8- 31.
ARNOLD, B. - HASSMANN, H. 1995: Archaeology in nazi Germany: the legacy of the Faustian bargain,
In: P. L. Kohl - C. Fawcett eds.: Nationalism, politics, and the Practice of Archaeology, 70-81. Cambridge.
BABOR, J. 1904: Diluviâlni clovëk. Praha.
BABOR, J. 1926-1927: Nase problémy palaeolithické, Obzor praehistorickf 5-6,1926-1927,6-20.
BABOR, J. 1927: Das Paläolithikum in der Slowakei, Die Eiszeit 4,79-80.
BABOR, J. 1931: Postavenie Slovenska v starsej kamennej dobe, Kultûra III.
BACA, R. 1988: Dejiny archeologického bädania v Moravanoch nad Vähom, Vlastivedny sprievodca okresu
Trnava 1987,27-43. Okresni muzeum Trnava se sidlem v Hlohovci.
BARCUCH, A. - BARCUCHOVÂ, K. 2003: Umëleckoprümyslové muzeum pro ostravsko-karvinsky revir
vletech 1924-1935, Ostrava. PHspèvky k dëjinâm a soucasnosti Ostravy a Ostravska 21,422-447. Ostrava.
BARCUCH, A. - BARCUCHOVÂ, K. 2005: Muzeum mësta Moravské Ostravy vletech 1935 az 1948, Ostrava.
Pfispevky k dëjinâm a soucasnosti Ostravy a Ostravska 22,425-454. Ostrava.
BARFORD, M. P. 1999: Znaczenie prac Gordona Childe’a w archeologii wspolczesnej. In: J. Lech. - F. M.
Stepniowski eds.: V Gordon Childe i Archaeologia w XX wieku, 277-291. Warszawa.
BARTOS, J. - TRAPL, M. 2004: Dëjiny Moravy - dû 4. Svobodny stat a okupace. Vlastivëda Moravskâ - Zemë
a lid, NR, sv. 9. Brno.
BÄRTA, J. 1966: Za univ. Prof. Dr. Josefom Skutilom, Slovenskâ archeolôgia XIV-1,227-229.
BÄRTA, J. 1975: Prehl’ad historié, archéologie a paléontologie v jaskyniach na Slovensku do r. 1945, Slovensky
kras 13,3-36.
BAYER, J. 1909: Jüngster Löß und paläolithische Kultur in Mitteleuropa, Jahrbuch für Archäologie 3,
149-160.
BAYER, J. 1922: Das Aurignac-Alter der Artefakte und menschlichen Skelettreste aus der Fürst-Johanns-
Höhle bei Lautsch in Mähren, Mitteilungen der Anthropologischen Gesellschaft in Wien 52,173-185.
BAYER, J. 1924: Eine Mammutjägerstation im Löß bei Pollau in Südmähren, Die Eiszeit 1,81-88.
BAYER, J. 1925a: Die ältere Steinzeit in den Sudetenländern, Sudeta 1,19-120.
BAYER, J. 1925b: Das jungpaläolithische Alter des Ochoskiefers, Die Eiszeit 2,35-40.
BAYER, J. 1927: Der Mensch im Eiszeitalter. Leipzig - Wien.
BAYER, J. 1931: Die falsche Venus von Wisternitz und ihre Geschichte. Brno.
BAYER, J. - STUMPF, G. 1929: Die altsteinzeitlichen Stationen auf dem Gilschwitzer Berg in Troppau, Eiszeit
und Urgeschichte 6,101-103.
BAZANT, J. 2002: „Paleolitické umëni“: prvnich sto let. In: E. Neustupny ed.: Archéologie nenalézaného,
9- 33. Praha.
BECVÂR, J. ed. 1969: Kulturni stopou Humpolecka (Hrdlicküv jubilejni sbornik): Dr. Ales Hrdlicka, svëtovy
antropolog, Humpolec 1869 - Ashington 1943: svêtové kulturni vyroci UNESCO. Humpolec.
BÉGOUËN, H. 1924: Projev dikû a obdivu cizich ücastnikü sjezdu, Ilustrovany svët, roc. II, cislo 36.
BENEDICTOVÄ, R. 1999: Kulturni vzorce. Praha.
BLÄHA, P 2009: Ales Hrdlicka - 140th anniversary of birth. Praha.
240
CESTY MORAVSKÉ PALEOLITICKÉ ARCHEOLOGIE V OBDOBÎ 6ESKOSLOVENSRÉ REPUBLIKY
BLAËEK, J. 2000: Archéologie v okupovaném pohranici. In: Z. Radvanovskÿ ed.: Historie okupovaného po-
hranici 5,135-155. Üsti nad Labem.
BLOMBERGOWA, M. M. 2004: Tragiczny final fascynacji Gorgona Childeda marksizmem i Zwi^zkiem
Radzieckim. In: B. Gediga - W. Piotrowski eds.: Archeologia, kultura, idéologie, Prâce Komisji Archeolo-
gicznej PAN Nr 15 - Biskupihskie Prâce Archeologiczne Nr. 3,301-318. Biskupin-Wroclaw.
BÖHMERS, A. 1940: Das eiszeitliche Frauenköpfchen von Unter-Wisternitz, in: Kleine Kostbarkeiten aus
Kunst und Geschichte (ed. J. O. Plassmann), 27-31. Berlin.
BÖHMERS, A. 1941: Reiche Funde eiszeitlicher Bildkunst. Die Ausgrabungen bei Unter-Wisternitz, Ger-
manien. Monatshefte für Germanenkunde zur Erkenntnis deutschen Wesens, 1941/2,45-57.
BORDES, F. H. 1953: Essai de classification des industrie „mousteériennes“, Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique
Française 50,457-466.
BORKOVSKY, 1.1940: Staroslovanskâ keramika ve stredni Evropë. Praha.
BOUZEK, J. - BUCHVALDEK, M. - KOSTOMITSOPOULOS, P. - SKLENÂR, K. 1976: Dèjiny archéologie.
Praha.
BOUZEK, J. - BUCHVALDEK, M. - KOSTOMITSOPOULOS, P. - SKLENÂR, K. 1983-1984: Dèjiny archéo-
logie I. a IL Praha.
BÖHM, J. 1926: Slezsko v dobë predhistorické, Vlastivëdny sbornik slezsky 2,15-31.
BÖHM, J. 1928-1930: Prispëvky kmoravské prehistorii I.—III., Casopis Vlasteneckého spolku muzejniho v Olo-
mouci XL, 52-64; KLI-XLII, 139-152; XLIII, 74-83. Olomouc.
BÖHM, J. 1934: Diluviâlni stanice v Lubné u Rakovnika. Vëstnik Musejniho spolku krâlovského mësta Rakov-
niku a politického okresu rakovnického XXIII, 1933,32-51.
BÖHM, J. 1936a: Ksiega pamatkowa ku uczceniu siedemdziesialej rocznicy urodzin prof. dr. Wlodzimierza
Demetrykiewicza. Str. 384, Obzor praehistoricky IX (1930-1935), 216-217.
BÖHM, J. 1936b: I. mezinârodni kongres vëd prehistorickÿch a protohistorickych, Obzor praehistoricky IX
(1930-1935), 197-200.
BÖHM, J. 1936-37: Sto let vyzkumu tri period, Obzor praehistoricky IX, 301-303.
BÖHM,}. 1937a: Zâklady haïlstattské periody v Cechâch. Praha.
BÖHM, J. 1937b: Jak doslo k poznâni pravëku, Nasipfirodou 1,231.
BÖHM, J. 1941: Kronika objeveného vëku. Praha.
BÖHM, J. 1949: Predmluva k ceskému vydâni. In: Childe, G. V.: Clovëk svym tvürcem, 5-9. Praha.
BÖHM, J. 1953: Studie o periodisaci pravëkych dëjin, Pamâtky archeologické 44,10-32.
BÖHM, J. 1954: Sto let pamâtek archeologickych, Pamâtky archeologické 55,1-34.
BÖHM, J. 1958: V. Gordon Childe, Pamâtky archeologické 49(2), 589-592.
BREUIL, H. 1906: La caverne dAltamira à Santillane, près Santander (Espagne). Monaco.
BREUIL, H. 1912: Les subdivisions du Paléolithique supérieur et leur signification. C. I. A. A. P, 14 session,
165-238. Genève.
BREUIL, H. 1923a: O umëni mladsiho diluvia, Obzor praehistoricky II-l, 30-32.
BREUIL, H. 1923b: Notes de voyage paléolithique en Europe Centrale I. Les industries paléolithiques en
Hongrie, ^Anthropologie 33,323-346.
BREUIL, H. 1924: Notes de voyage paléolithique en Europe Centrale IL Les industries paléolothiques du
loess de Moravie et Bohême, LAnthropologie 34,515-552.
BREUIL, H. 1925: Notes de voyage paléolithique en Europe Centrale III. Les cavernes de Moravie, LAnthro-
pologie 35,271-291.
BREUIL, H. 1952: Quatre cent siècles de lârt pariétal Montinac.
BREUIL, H. - KOZLOWSKI, L. 1931: Études de stratigraphie paléolithique dans le Nord de la France, la Bel-
gique et ÏAngleterre, L Anthropologie 41(5-6), 449-488.
BREUIL, H. - KOZLOWSKI, L. 1932: Études de stratigraphie paléolithique dans le Nord de la France, la Bel-
gique et ÏAngleterre, L Anthropologie 42(1-2), 27-47 a (3-4), 291-314.
BREUIL, H. - KOZLOWSKI, L. 1934: Études de stratigraphie paléolithique dans le Nord de la France, la Bel-
gique et ÏAngleterre, L Anthropologie 44(3-4), 249-290.
241
CESTY MORAVSKÉ PALEOLITICKÊ ARCHEOLOGIE V OBDOBl CESKOSI.OVENSKÉ REPUBLIKY
BRODERICK, A. H. 1963: Father of Prehistory; the Abbé Henri Breuil: His Life and Times. New York: Morrow;
London: Hutchinson (v Londÿnë publ. jako The Abbé Breuil: Prehistorian).
BRODESSER, S. - BRECKA, J. - MIKULKA, J. 2002: Kpoznâniaslâvëzemë. Dèjiny Moravskéhozemského
muzea. Brno.
BRUHL-LÉVY, L. 1999: Mysleni clovëka primitivniho. Praha.
BRZOBOHATŸ, R. - MUSIL, R. 1993: Karel Zapletal, clovëk, ucitel, geolog. Brno.
BRZON, F. 1983: Chlapec s arnykou; kronika dëtstvi svëtového antropologa dr. Alese Hrdlicky. Ceské Budëjovice.
BRECKA, J. 2002: Moravské zemské muzeum v obdobi nëmecké okupace 1939-1945, Acta Musei Moraviae,
Sci. soc. 87,203-218.
BUDIL, 1.1998: Mytus,jazyk a kulturni antropologie. Praha.
BUDIL, 1.2012: Riskantni souziti: antropologie a archéologie v Nëmecku na pfelomu devatenâctého a dva-
câtého stoleti v sirsich historickÿch souvislostech, Sbornik Nârodniho muzea v Praze, fada A - Historié,
sv. 66, c. 3-4, 5-10.
BUCHTELA, K. - NIEDERLE, L. 1910: Rukovèt’ ceské archéologie. Praha
BULKIN, A. V. - KLEJN, S. L. - LEBEDEV, S. G. 1982: Attainments and problème of Societ archaeology,
World Archaeology vol. 13, No. 3,272-295.
BULYK, N. - LECH, J. 2009: Karol Hadaczek (1873-1914) and the biginnings of archaeology in universities
of the North-East borderland of the Austro-Hungarian Monarchy, Archaeologia Polona 47/2009,59-90.
BURIAN, V 1938: Jeskynë u Bfeziny vokresekonickém, Casopis Vlastivëdnésho spolku musejniho v Olomouci,
51,141-143.
BURIAN, V. 1946: Vavfin Travënec, Casopis Vlastivëdného spolku musejniho v Olomouci 55, 373.
BURKITT, M. C. 1921: Prehistory: A Study of Early Cultures in Europe and the Mediterranean Basin.
Cambridge.
BURKITT, M. C. 1924: Report on the Anthropological Congress Held in Prague Under the Auspices of l’In-
stitut International dAnthropologie, Man vol. 24,174-176.
BURKITT, M. C. 1928: South Africa’s Past in Stone and Paint. Cambridge (reedice 2012).
CILEK, V. 1993: Karel Absolon v pravém svëtle aneb o knize, kterâ se do soupisu literatury nedostala, Speleo
11,15-18.
CLARK, D. G. J. 1932: The Mesolithic Age in Britain. Cambridge.
CLARK, D. G. ]. 1936: The Mesolithic Settlement of Northern Europe: A Study of the Food Gathering Peoples
of Northern Europe During the Early Post-glacial Period. Cambridge.
CLARK, D. G. J. 1939: Archaeology and Society. London.
CLARK, D. G. J. 1954: Excavations at Star Carr. Cambridge.
CLARK, D. G. J. 1973: Prehistoric svëta. Praha.
COLES, J. 1997: John Grahame Douglas Clark, Proceedings of the British Academy 94,357-387. Cambridge.
COUFALI'K, E. - HEDGES, J. - ONDROUSEK, V. 1982: Tajemstvi Macochy, The Worlds First Speleological
Documentary Film with Sound, NSS Bulletin 44,3-5.
CZ1ZEK, R. 1925: Die Besiedlung der Stierfelshdhle in vorgeschichtlicher Zeit, Tagesbote No. 18,31,37,45.
Brno.
CERNOHORSKŸ, K. 1927: Museum matice moravské ajeho sbirky. Opava.
CERNŸ, F. 1904: Sob na Moravë, Pravëk 2,33-48,89-121.
CERNŸ, F. 1907: Vÿvoj archeologického bâdâni na Moravë, Pravëk 3,151-155.
CERNŸ, F. 1908: Pravëké doby Moravy. Brno.
CERNŸ, F. 1914: Morava v dobë pravëké. Praha.
CERVENŸ, E. 2008: Dr. Karel füttner ve vzpominkâch svych studentu, Regio M - Sbornik regionâlniho muzea
v Mikulovë 2008,113-117.
CERVINKA, I. L. 1902: Morava zapravèku, Vlastivëda moravskâ I. (red. Fr. Dvorsky). Zemë a lid, svazek IL
Brno.
CERVINKA, I. L. 1903: Pëstovâni praehistorické archéologie na Moravë, Ceskoslovanské letopisy musejni 1,
53-58.
242
CESTY MORAVSKÉ PALEOLITICKÉ ARCHEOLOGIE V OBDOBÎ CESKOSLOVENSKÉ REPUBLIKY
CERVINKA, I. L. 1908; O pokoleni skrcenych koster na Moravë. Podle stavu dosavadniho bàààni a vlastnich
vyzkumù. Moravské starozitnosti. Dû IL Kojetin na Hané.
CERVINKA, I. L. 1927: Pravèk zemi Ceskych. Brno.
CERVINKA, I. L. 1928: Slované na Moravë a rise Velkomoravskâ. Brno.
CERVINKA, I. L. 1935: Problémy moravské praehistorie, Priroda 28-8,244-249.
CIZMÂR, M. 2001: Jaroslav Böhm a moravskâ archéologie, Archeologické rozhledy LUI, 757-762.
CIZMÂR, M. 2005: Hans Freising - 100 let od narozeni, Pravëk NR 15/2005,479-481.
CIZMÂR, M. 2007: Frantisek Cernÿ (14.6.1867-3. 9.1918), Pravëk NR 17,452-453.
DANIEL, G. 1962: The Idea of Prehistory. London.
DANIEL, G. 1976: A Hundred and fifty years of Archaeology. Cambridge.
DART, A. R. 1963: Dobrodruzstvi s „chybëjidm clânkem1. Praha.
DENNELL, R. 1990: Progressive gradualism, imperialism and academic fashion: Lower Palaeolithic archeo-
logy in the 20th century, Antiquity 64, 549-558.
DEUEL, L. 1979: Objevy zptaciperspektivy: pfibëh letecké archéologie. Praha.
DOHNAL, V 1979: Archéologie v olomouckém muzeu. Olomouc.
DOHNAL, V. 2008: Olomouckâ archéologie ajejipromény. Olomouc.
DOKLÄDAL, M. 1957: Profesor Dr. Karel Absolon osmdesâtnikem, Zpravodaj Anthropologické spolecnosti
vBrnëX-1,1-3.
EICKHOFF, M. 2009: Historie „ukradeného“ nalezistë. Assien Böhmers a vykopâvky SS-Ahnenerbe v Dol-
nich Vëstonicich, RegioM, roc. 2009,129-146.
EISNER, J. 1933: Slovensko v Pravëku. Bratislava.
EISNER, J. 1961: Archéologie o kulturni jednotë slovanské, Pamâtky archeologické 52/2,459-464.
FETTER, V. 1953: Dr. Ales Hrdlicka, svëtovy badatel ve védë o clovëku. Praha.
FETTER, V. 1963: Zivot a dilo Jindricha Matiegky, Antropologie 1.
FIKEJZ, R. 1998: Prof Alexander Makowsky (1833-1908). Svitavy.
FILIP, J. 1929-1930: Porost a podnebi Cech v Pravëku, Pamâtky archeologické 36,169-188.
FILIP, J. 1939-1946: Jan Eisner a jeho dilo, Pamâtky archeologické 42,183-188.
FILIP, J. 1937: Popelnicovâ pole a pocâtky doby zelezné v Cechâch. Praha.
FILIP, J. 1940: Kulturni kapitoly z naseho pravëku. Praha.
FILIP, J. 1941: Umëlecké femeslo v pravëku. Praha.
FILIP. J. 1948: Pravëké Ceskoslovensko. Praha.
FILIP, J. 1966: Doslov, In: Childe G. V.: Na prahu dëjin, 255-258. Praha.
FILIP, J. 1966-1969: Enzyklopädisches Handbuch zur Ur- und Frühgeschichte Europas I, II. Praha.
FILIPOVÄ, A. 1985: Jeden lidsky zivot. Portrét akademika Jana Filipa. Praha.
FILIPOVÄ, A. 1995: Archeolog Jan Filip ve vzpominkäch. Praha.
FISER, Z. 1979: Dëjiny archeologickÿch vyzkumù na Kromërizsku, Studie Muzea Kromefizska 79,2-21.
FI$ER, Z. 2002: Moravské zemské muzeum a koupë jedné archeologické sbirky, Acta Musei Moraviae, Sei.
soc. 87,187-194.
FISER, Z. - PODBORSKŸ, VI. 2004: Inocenc Ladislav Cervinka 1869-1952. Pravëk - Postavy moravské
archéologie sv. 1. Brno.
FOLPRECHT, J. 1930: Predhistorické nâlezy na Ostravsku, Sbornik Pfirodovëdecké spolecnosti v Moravské
Ostravë 5,3-10.
FOLPRECHT, J. 1934: Vÿzkumné prâce na praehistorickém sidlisti v Petrkovicich, Priroda 27,77-86.
FOLPRECHT, J. 1936: Predhistorické sidlisté na Ostravsku, Technickâ prâce na Ostravsku 1926-1936,
143-150.
FOLPRECHT, J. 2000: Zâvërecnâ zprâva o archeologickÿch vyzkumech na Landeku, Prehled vyzkumù 41,
13-20.
FOLPRECHT, J. (ml.) 1996: O prvnich archeologickÿch vyzkumech na Landeku, Tësinsko 1996,23-25.
FRANZ, L. 1937: Aus den Anfängen der Vorgeschichtsforschung in der Tschechoslowakei, Sudeta 13,
77-102.
243
CESTY MORAVSKfi PALEOLITICKfi ARCHEOLOGIE V OBDOBi CESKOSLOVENSKE REPUBLIKY
FREISING, H. 1980: Beiträge zur Vor-und Frühgeschichte Mährens. Mit einem Vorrwort von Hansjürgen Mül-
ler-Beck, Herausgegeben von Wilfried Fiedler. Sigmaringen.
FREUD, S. 1991: Totem a tabu: Vtip ajeho vztah k nevedomi: Teoretickä cast. Praha.
FRIC, A. 1867:0 dejinäch prace, Ziva 14,1867-8,273-294.
FRIDRICH, J. 2005: Ecce homo. Svet dävnych lovcü a sberacü. Praha.
FUKAL, R. 1952: Dejiny musejniho spolku v Brne, Vlastivedny vestnik moravsky VIL, 206-230.
GALUSKA, L. 1996: Antonín Zelnitius, 1876-1957, Pravek NR 6,296-297.
GARROD, D. 1938: The Upper Palaeolithic in the light of the recent discoveries, Proc. Prehist. Soc. 4,1-26.
GOJDA, M. 2000: Archeologie krajiny. Vyvoj archetypü kulturni krajiny. Praha.
GOLEC, M. 2013a: Grupe für Höhlenforschung Sektion des Vereines deutscher Touristen Brünn - policejni
archiv, www.byciskala.cz, clanky 3.3.2013.
GOLEC, M. 2013b: Hermann Bock - z Moravskeho krasu do jeskyni pod Dachsteinem, www.byciskala.cz,
clanky 6.9. 2013.
GOLEC, M. 2013c: Nemecti speleologove 1927-1945 vMoravskem Svycarsku - policejni archiv, www.byciskala.cz,
clanky 23.6.2013.
GOLEC, M. 2013d: Julius Simon - objev Skalniho zämku, Böhlerovy chodby a Svedske veze, www.byciskala.cz,
clanky 25.8.2013.
GOLEC, M. 2013e: Antonín Bocek a Speleologicky klub Brno v Byci skale, www.byciskala.cz, clanky 17.6.
2013.
GOLEC, M. 2013f: Karel a Viktor Kubaskovi - speleologove a horolezci, www.byciskala.cz, clanky 28.3.2013.
GORODCOV, V. A. 1933: The typological Metod in archaeology, American Anthropologist 35,95-102.
GOTTWALD, A. 1925: Pravekä sidliste a pohfebiste na Prostejovsku. Prostejov.
GOTTWALD, A. 1931: Müj archeologicky vyzkum. Prostejov.
GREGOR, A. 1960:0 zivote a dile Frantiska Cerneho, Vlastivedny vestnik moravsky 15,233-242.
GROH, VI. 1931: Souborny referat o tzv. II. vestonicke Venusi, Casopis Matice moravske 55,564-566.
GRÜNERT, H. 2002: Gustaf Kossinna (1858-1931), Vom Germanisten zum Prähistoriker: Ein Wissenschaftler
im Kaiserreich und in der Weimarer Republik. Rahden/Westfalen, Leidorf.
HABOVSTIAK, A. 1989: Jan Eisner a müzejnictvo a ochrana pamiatok, Zbornik Filozofickej fakulty Univerzity
Komenskeho, Historica, Rocnik XXXIX-XL, 153-158.
HALMOVÄ 1928-1930: Antiquity, Pamätky archeologicke 36,160-164,314-316.
HARDING F, A. 1999: V. Gordon Childe i europejska epoka brqzu. In: J. Lech - F. M. Stepniowski eds.:
V. Gordon Childe i Archaeologia w XX wieku, 149-158. Warszawa.
HASSINGER, H. 1914: Die Mährische Pforte und ihre benachbarten Landschaften. Abhandlungen der Geo-
graphischen Gesellschaft, Bd. XI, Nr. 2, Wien.
HAUSER, 0.1925a: Die grosse zentraleuropäische Urrasse. Langensalza.
HAUSER, 0.1925b: Urgeschichte auf Grundlage praktischer Ausgrabungen und Forschungen. Jena.
HAUZEUR, A. - LECH, J, 2006: Eolity z wqwozu korytania w Ojcowie: polski przyczynek do Badari po-
chodzenia ludzkosci z poczqtku XX wieku. In: J. Lech - J. Partyka eds.: Jura Ojcowska w pradziejach
i w poczqtkach pahstwa polskiego, 121-157. Ojcöw.
HAVLÜJOVÄ, H. 2009: Muzeum z casü krize. Kapitola z dejin Hrdlickova muzea cloveka, Dejiny a soucasnost
c. 12, r. XXXI, 24-27.
HAßMANN, H. 2000: Archeology in the „Third Reich“. In: H. Härke ed.: Archeology, Ideology and Society:
The German Experience, 65-139. Frankfurt am Main.
HÄRKE, H. 2000: Archaeology, Ideology and Society: The German Experience. Frankfurt am Main.
HEINRICH, W. 1974-75: Paläolith-Forschung in Österreich - Ein Rückblick auf die letzen 25 Jahre, Mittei-
lungen der österreichischen Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Ur- und Frühgeschichte 25,1-40.
HERMANN, T. 2009: Vy jste Darwin! Yes, I am Darwin. Darwin ceskyma ocima a darwinismus v ceskych
zemich, Dejiny a soucasnost XXXI/2,36-39.
HILLEBRAND, J. 1919: Das Paläolithikum Ungarns, Wiener Prähistorische Zeitschrift VI, 14-40.
HILLEBRAND, J. 1935: Die altäre Steinzeit in Ungarn, Archaeologia Hungarica XVII. Budapest.
244
CESTY MORAVSKÉ PALEOLITICKÉ ARCHEOLOGIE V OBDOBÍ ¿ESKOSLOVENSKÉ REPUBLIKY
HLAVA, M. 2006: Mizzi (Maria) Maneth (1898-31.12.1971), Pravëk NR 16/2006, 530-535.
HLAVA, M. 2008: Vinzenz Reimer (13. srpna 1868-11. ledna 1938), Pravëk NR 18/2008,430-435.
HLAVA, M. - KALÁBKOVÁ, P. - SLÉZAR, P. 2014: Pribëhy unicovské archéologie. Unicov.
HOERNES, M. 1898: Urgeschichte der bildenden Kunst in Europa von den Anfängen bis um 500 vor Chr. Wien.
HOERNES, M. 1903: Der diluviale Mensch in Europa. Braunschweig.
HOERNES, M. - MENGHIN, 0.1925: Urgeschichte der bildenden Kunst in Europa von den Anfängen bis um
500 vor Christi Wien.
HRDLICKA, A. 1925: The Origin and Antiquity of the American Indian, Annual Report of the Smithsonian
Institution for 1923,481-494.
HRDLICKA, A. 1927: Neanderthálské obdobi clovëka, Anthropologie 5,174-199.
HRDLICKA, A. 1930: The skeletal remains of early Man. Washington.
HRDLICKA, A. 1931: Problém neanderthálského clovëka, Anthropologie 9,194-197.
HRDLICKA, A. 1932: The coming of Man from Asia in the light of recent discoveries. Washington.
HROMADA, J. 2000: Moravany nad Váhom. Táboriska lovcov mamutov na Povází. Archeologické pamätniky
Slovenska, zv. 6. Bratislava.
HUCKE, K. 1943: Karl Schirmeisen zum 75. Geburtstag, Zeitschrift des Mährischen Landesmuseums, Neue
Folge, III Band - Festschrift zum 125 Jährigen Bestehen des Mährischen Landesmuseums, 326-332.
Brünn.
HUMPOLOVÁ, A. - PODBORSKŸ, VI. 2013: To nejlepsí z archeologické sbirky Frantiska Vildomce. Brno.
HŸBL, F. 2010: Antonín Telicka - osobnost zakladatele archeologickÿch sbírek pferovského muzea. In:
A. Drechsler - F. Hÿbl - J. Mikulík - V. Peska - Z. Schenk - J. Svoboda: Archéologie Pferovska, 15-20.
Pferov.
HŸSEK, M. 1911: Literární Morava v letech 1849-1885. Moravská Ostrava.
HŸSEK, M, 1970: Pamëti. Brno.
CHARDIN, T. P 1990: Vesmír a lidstvo. Praha.
CHILDE, V. G. 1923: Jaroslav Palliardi. Obituary, Man t 24,4-10.
CHILDE, V. G. 1925: The Dawn of European Civilization. London.
CHILDE, V. G. 1926: The Aryans. A Study of Indo-European Origins. London.
CHILDE, V. G. 1928: The Most Ancienit East: The Oriental Prelude to European Prehistory. London.
CHILDE, V G. 1929: The Danube in Prehistory. Oxford.
CHILDE, V G. 1930: The Bronze Age. Cambridge.
CHILDE, V. G. 1933: Is Prehistory Practical?, Antiquity 7,410-418.
CHILDE, V G. 1934: New Light on the Most Ancienit East: The Oriental Prelude to European Prehistory. London.
CHILDE, V. G. 1935: Changing Methods and Aims in Prehistory. Presidential Adress for 1935, Proceedings
of the Prehistoric Society 1,1-15. V polském pfekladu In: J. Lech - F. M. Stepniowski eds.: V. Gordon
Childe i Archaeologia w XX wieku, 419-439. Warszawa.
CHILDE, V. G. 1939: The Dawn of European Civilization. 3rd edn. London.
CHILDE, V G. 1942: What Happened in History. Harmondsworth.
CHILDE, V. G. 1944: Progress and Archeology. London.
CHILDE, V. G. 1946: Scotland before the Scots. London.
CHILDE, V. G. 1949: Clovëk svym tvurcem. Praha.
CHILDE, V G. 1966: Naprahu dëjin. Praha.
CHILDE, V. G, 1979: Prehistory and Marxism, Antiquity t. 53 (208), 93-95.
CHMIELEWSKI, W 1992: Geologiczne koncepcje S. Krukowskiego. In.: J. Lech - J. Partika eds.: Prof. Stefan
Krukowski (1890-1982). Dzialnosc archeologiczna i jej znaczenie dla nauki polskej, 119-123. Ojców.
CHROPOVSKŸ, B. 1989: Jan Eisner a slovenská archeológia, Zbornik Filozofickej fakulty Univerzity Ko-
menského, Histórica, Rocník XXXIX-XL, 133-138.
JANÁK, V. 2001: Jaroslav Böhm a slezská archéologie, Archeologické rozhledy LIII-4,772-779.
JANÁSEK, J. 1971: Pamâtce prof. dr. Josefa Skuitla - Putování k jeho predkûm, Vlastivëdnà rocenka Okr.
archxvu v Blansku 1971,75-81.
245
CESTY MORAVSKfi PALEOLITICKfi ARCHEOLOGIE V OBDOBl CESKOSI.OVENSKE REPUBLIKY
JANOVSKY, R. - SKUTIL, J. 1938: Pfedhistoricke nälezy Rud. Janovskeho z Holesovska, Casopis Vlastived-
neho musejniho spolku v Olomouci 51,9-48.
JANSÄK, S. 1935: Praveke sidliskä s obsidiänovou industriou na vychodnom Slovensku. Präce Ucene spolec-
nosti Safafikovy, Sv. 17. Bratislava.
JANSÄK, S. 1955: Zäklady archeologickeho vyskumu v terene. Bratislava.
JASTRZEBOWSKA, E. 1999: Pözny antyk w ujfdu Gordona Childe’a. Zrodla i inspiracje. In: J. Lech - F. M.
Stepniowski eds.: V. Gordon Childe i Archaeologia w XX wieku, 167-172. Warszawa.
JEFIMENKO, P. P. 1953: Pervobytnoje obscestvo. Kiev.
JELlNEK, J. 1960: Prof. Dr. Karel Absolon, Acta Musei Moraviae, Sei. Nat. XLV, 265-268.
JELINEK, J. 1972: Velky obrazovy atlas pravekeho cloveka. Praha.
JELINEK, J. 2006: Stfecha nad hlavou. Koreny nejstarsi architektury a bydleni. Brno.
JISL, L. 1964: Pocatky archeologickeho badani ve Slezsku a opavska muzea, in: 150 let Slezskeho muzea,
121-129. Ostrava.
JURA, A. 1938: Das Aurignacien in Polen, Quartär 1,54-75.
JÜTTNER, K. - MATZURA, J. 1922: Erstmalige Notiz über die Entdeckung der Paläolithstation Unt.-Wis-
ternitz, Tagesbote, Nr. 293. Brno
KADIC, 0.1935: Der Mensch zur Eiszeit in Ungarn, Annalles Instituti regii Hungarici geologici XXX-I.
KALOUSEK, F. 1936-1937: Sjezd ceskoslovenskych prehistorikü v Brne, konanyna oslavu 30leteho trväniMo-
ravskeho archeologickeho klubu ve dnech 30. dubna az 3. kvetna 1936. Zvlästni otisk z casopisu „Obzor
praehistoricky“, rocnikX., (1936-1937), 8 str.
KALOUSEK, E 1939-1946: K sedesatce univ. prof. PhDr. Emanuela Simka, Pamätky archeologicke 42,
177-183.
KALOUSEK, F. 1947: K sedesatce univ. Prof. Dr. Emanuela Simka. Postavy moravske prehistorie - näkladem
MAKu, Brno. Totez: Pamätky archeologicke 42-1946,177-183.
KANYZA, J. 1970: Vzpominka na Dr. Jos. Skutila, Sb. Okr. vl. mus. vBlansku 2,63-64.
KARGER, V. 1922: Pfedhistoricke bädäni ve Slezsku a vystava prvohistorickych starozitnosti v Zemskem
muzeu slezskem, Vestnik Slezskeho zemskeho muzea v Opave 1,7-31.
KATER, M. 1974: Das Ahennerbe des SS 1935-1945. Ein Beitrag zur Kulturpolitik des Dritten Reiches. Stuttgart.
KEITH, A. 1931: New discovereris relating to the Antiquity of Man. London.
KELLER, J. 2005: Dejiny klasicke sociologie. Praha.
KETTNER, R. 1961a: Prof. Dr. Karel Absolon mrtev, Sbornik Ceskoslovenske spolecnosti zemepisne 66,
147-151.
KETTNER, R. 1961b: Prof. PhDr. Karel Absolon zemrel, Ceskoslovensky kras 13 1960/1961,163-169.
KETTNER, R. 1970: Zivot a dilo prof. dr. Karla Absolona. In: K. Absolon, Moravsky kras 1,11-14. Praha.
KLADIVO, B. 1936: Jan Knies (Doplnky k vlastnimu zivotopisu), Blanensky skoläk 1936,8-14.
KLANICOVÄ, E. 1994: PhDr. Karel Jüttner - 35 let od umrti. Pravek NR 4/1994,397-399.
KLlMA, B. 1962: Za prof. dr. Karlem Absolonem, Anthropozoikum X/1960,7-23.
KLlMA, B. 1963: Dolni Vestonice. Vyzkum tabofiste loveü mamutü v letech 1947-1952. Monumenta
Archaeologica, Tomus XI. Praha.
KLlMA, B. 1990: Lovci mamutü z Pfedmosti. Praha.
KLIND-JENSEN, 0.1975: A history of Scandinavian archaeology. London.
KNIES, J. 1901: Praveke nälezy jeskynni Balcarovy skaly u Ostrava na vysocine Drahanske, Vestnik Klubu
prirodovedeckeho v Prostejove, 31-81.
KNIES, J. 1902: Vlastiveda Moravskä - okres Blanensky, sv. II., cis. 4. Brno.
KNIES, J. 1906: Kniesovo museum Moravskeho Krasu ve Sloupe. Prostejov.
KNIES, J. 1907: „Kniesovo museum Mor. Krasu“ ve Sloupe, Pravek roc. 3, c. 2,43-48.
KNIES, J. 1910a: Prätelüm turistiky v Mor. Krase. Boskovice.
KNIES, J. 1910b: Jeskyne Külna, Pravek 6,26-28.
KNIES, J. 1911: Nove nälezy ze sidliste diluviälniho cloveka v Külne u Sloupu, Casopis Vlasteneckeho musej-
niho spolku v Olomouci 29,16-18.
246
CESTY MORAVSKÉ PALEOLITICKÉ ARCHEOLOGIE V OBDOBÍ CESKOSLOVENSKÉ REPUBLIKY
KNIES, J. 1912a: Nové doklady píítomnosti palaeolitického clovéka v Külné u Sloupu, Acta Musei Moraviae
12,310-330.
KNIES, J. 1912b: Dodatek k novym nálezúm ze sídlisté diluviálního clovéka v Kúlné u Sloupu, Casopis Vlaste-
neckého musejního spolku v Olomouci 29,16-18.
KNIES, J. 1913: Nové doklady píítomnosti palaeolitického clovéka v Kúlné u Sloupu, Acta Musei Moraviae
13,199-121.
KNIES, J. 1914: Zpráva o vyzkumu jeskyné Kúlny r. 1913, Casopis Vlasteneckého musejního spolku v Olomouci
31,34-38.
KNIES, J. 1916: Karel Jaroslav Maska (1851-1916), Wiener Prähistorische Zeitschrift 3,141-151.
KNIES, J. 1921: Údolí HolStynské na Moravé, jeho vznik a palaeontologicky vyzkum, Véstník Klubu Prírodo-
védeckého v Prostéjové 18, 51-78.
KNIES, J. 1923: Rozsírení bobra za dob minulych na Moravé a zemích sousedních, Casopis Vlasteneckého
musejního spolku v Olomouci 33,4-8.
KNIES, J. 1925: Pfehled moravského paleolithu, Obzor praehistoricky 4 (Niederluv sborník), 89-116.
KNIES, J. 1926: O zménách ve zvífené za doby diluviální na Moravé, Pfíroda r. 19, c. 12,325-332.
KNIES, J. 1927: Déjiny vyzkumu moravského diluvia se soupisem literatury, rkp. ulozeny na ÚAM FFMU
a v archivu Ústavu Anthropos MZM.
KNIES, J. 1929a: Jan Knies, jeho zivotní dílo a seznam publikací. Kroméfíz.
KNIES, J. 1929b: První stopy lidské na Moravé, Sb. Pfírodovédecké spolecnosti v Moravské Ostravé, r. IV
(1926-1928), 45-89.
KNIES, J. 1929c: Pravéké nálezy ve Stramberku. Stramberk.
KOCÁBOVÁ, D. 2008: Nebyt jeho, zámek by snad jesté hoíel. Regio M - Sborník regionálního muzea v Mi-
kulové2008, 103-112.
KOHL, P. L. - FAWCETT (eds.) 1995: Nationalism, politics, and the Practice of Archaeology. Cambridge.
KOHOUTEK, J. 1996: Pocátky a rozvoj regionálního bádání na Zlínsku, Archeologické rozhledy XLVIII - 4,
559-564.
KOLBINGER, D. 2013: Stefan Jansák. Ceskoslovensky prükopník povrchového sbéru a archeologicke krajiny,
Archeologie Moravy a Slezska XIII/2013,63-95.
KOMÁREK, S. 2008: Obraz clovéka a pfírody v zrcadle biologie. Praha.
KOPECKY, M. 1995: Josef Skutil ocima literárního historika, Vlastivédny Véstník Moravsky 1995/3,299-302.
KOSSACK, G. 1992: Prehistoric Archaeology in Germany: its History and Current Situation, Norwegian
Archaeological Review, Vol. 25, No. 2,73-109.
KOSSINNA, G. 1911: Die Herkunft der Germanen. Zur Methode der Siedlungsarchäologie, Mannusbibliothek
nr. 6. Würzburg.
KOSSINNA, G. 1917: Meine Reise nach West-und Ostpreussen und meine Berufung zu Generalfeldmarchall
von Hindenburg im August 1915. Mannus 9,119-195.
KOSSINNA, G. 1919: Das Weichselland. Ein uralter Heimatboden der Germanem. Dancing.
KOSSINNA, G. 1943: Das Weichselland. Ein uralter Heimatboden der Germanen. Leipzig.
KOSTRHUN, P. 2003: Mamuti projekty prof. Karla Absolona, Archeologické rozhledy LV-1,76-129.
KOSTRHUN, P. 2004: Neúnavny heuristik moravského pravéku - prof. Josef Skutil. Pravék NR 14,441-450.
KOSTRHUN, P. 2005: Stípaná industrie magdalénienu z jeskyné Kúlny, Acta Musei Moraviae, Sei. soc. 80,
79-128.
KOSTRHUN, P. 2006: Karel Absolon a Venuse mezi vinohrady. Rozrazil 7/2006, 33-39.
KOSTRHUN, P. 2007a: Konference „The History of archaeology and archaeological thought in the 20th Cen-
tury“, Archeologické rozhledy, 627-629. Praha.
KOSTRHUN, P. 2007b: Tfeti expedice Karla Absolona na dno Macochy v roce 1905 v rukopisném deniku
ucitele Aloise Krále, Sborník muzea Blansko 2007, 115-133.
KOSTRHUN, P. 2008a: Spory o moravské diluvium Jana Kniese. In: J. Klápsté - Z. Méíínsky eds.: Disserta-
tions Archaeologicae Brunenses/Pragensesque. Supplementum I. Moravskoslezská skola doktorskych studii.
Seminar 1,13-26. Brno.
247
CESTY MORAVSKÉ PALEOLITICKÊ ARCHEOLOGIE V OBDOßl ÛESKOSLOVENSKÉ REPUBLIKY
KOSTRHUN, P. 2008b: Jan Knies 1860-1937. Pravék - Postavy moravské archéologie 4.
KOSTRHUN, P. 2009a: Dvojité vÿroci Hugo V. Sânky (1859-1929). 150 let od narozeni, 80 let od ümrti, Pra-
vêkNR 19/2009,311-318.
KOSTRHUN, R 2009b: Karel Absolon (1877-1960) and the research of significant Palaeolithic sites in Mo-
ravia, Archeologia Polona 47,91-139.
KOSTRHUN, P. 2011: Pred 150 lety se narodil ucitel a archeolog Jan Knies, Vlastivédnÿ vêstnik moravskÿ
63/1,89-94.
KOSTRHUN, P. 2013: „Papez prehistoric“ Abbé Henri Breuil na Moravë, Studia Archeaeologica Brunensia
18,2,41-60.
KOSTRHUN, P. 2014: Cesko-polské vztahy ve vÿzkumu paleolitu v mezivâlecném obdobi. Svëdectvi archivu
Karla Absolona, Acta Musei Moraviae, Sei. soc. 99/1,7-35.
KOSTRHUN, P. - MAREK, M. 2008: Mamut - Bata - Absolon, Acta Musealia, Zlin: Muzeum jihovychodni
Moravy, roc. 2008,1-2, s. 192-196.
KOSTRHUN, P. - MORAVEC, J. - OLIVA, M. 2010: Vyzkumné cesty a mezinarodni kontakty Karla Abso-
lona v letech 1904-1938. In: P. Kostrhun - M. Oliva eds.: K. Absolon -fotografie z evropskych jeskyn
a krasù, 5-25. Brno.
KOSTRHUN, P. - OLIVA, M. (eds.) 2010: K. Absolon -fotografie z evropskych jeskyn a krasù. Brno.
KOSTRHUN, P. - OLIVA, M. (eds.) 2010b: Fotografie z evropskych jeskyn a krasù - elektronicky katalog. Brno
(DVD ISBN 978-80-7028-372-1).
KOSTRHUN, P. - OLIVA, M. 2011: Digitalizace fotografického fondu z pozûstalosti Karla Absolona, Acta
Musei Moraviae, Sei. soc. 96/1,59-70.
KOSTRHUN, P. - SKLENÂR, K. 2010: Antropologickâ vÿstava v Moskvë 1879. Fotograficky katalog z po-
zûstalosti J. Wankla a K. Absolona, Acta Musei Moravicae, Sei soc. 95/2,113-139.
KOSTRZEWSKI, J. 1925: Znaky na dnach naczyh wczesnojhistoricznych z Wielkopolski, Obzor praehistoricky
IV (Niederlüv sbornik), 117-130.
KOSTRZEWSKI, J. 1933: Quelques osbservations sur le Tardenoisien en Grande Pologne, Nouirry, E. (Librai-
rie): XVe Congrès International d’Anthropologie et d’Archéologie Préhistorique. Ve Session L’Institut Inter-
national d’Antropologie, Paris 20-27 Septembre 1931,400-408. Paris.
KOSTRZEWSKI, J. 1949: Dzieje polskich badan prehistorycznych. Poznan.
KOSTURIK, P. 1986: Dëjiny archeologické cinnosti na Trebicsku. In: P. Kosturik - J. Kovârnik - Z. Mërin-
skÿ - M. Oliva: Pravék Tfebicska. Brno - Trebic.
KOSTURÎK, P. 1994: Sto let od narozeni Viléma Grosse, Pravék NR. 4,391-392.
KOUDELKA, F. 1902: Seznam literârnkh praci, clânkû, pojednâni a spisùjez uverejnil Floriân Koudelka. Vyskov.
KOVÂRNlK, J. 1995: Dëjiny archeologickÿch vyzkumù na jihozâpadni Moravë. In: VI. Podborsky ed.: Sbornik
pfispèvkù proslovenych na I. obnoveném sjezdu Moravskoslezského archeologického klubu v Moravskych
Budëjovicich 16.-17. srpna 1995, 23-30. Brno.
KOVÄRNIK, J. 2001: Dëjiny archeologického bâdâni na Znojemsku. In: VI. Podborsky ed.: 50 let archeolo-
gickÿch vyzkumù Masarykovy univerzity na Znojemsku, 95-125.
KOVÂRNÎK, J. 2008: K dëjinâm vyzkumu neolitu (a zvlâstë moravské malované keramiky). In: Z. Cizmâr
ed.:, Zivot a smrt v mladsi dobê kamenné, 4-11. Brno.
KOZLOWSKI, L. 1922a: Starsza epoka kamienia w Polsce (Paleolit). Poznan.
KOZLOWSKI, L. 1922b: Problem etniczny w prehistorji, Lud 21,17-28.
KOZLOWSKI, L. 1923: Epoka kamienia na wydmach wschodniej czçsci Wyzyny Malopolskiej. Lwôw.
KOZLOWSKI, L. 1924: Die ältere Steinzeit in Polen. Die Eiszeit, Zeitschrift für allgemeine Eiszeitforschung
1(2), 112-163.
KOZLOWSKI, L. 1926: L époque mésolithique en Pologne, EAnthropologie 36,47-74.
KOZLOWSKI, L. 2001 : Mojeprzezycia w wiçzieniu sowieckim i na wolnosci w czasie wojny w Rosji sowieckiej.
Warszawa.
KOZLOWSKI, S. K. 1996a: Stefan Krukowski, na poczqntku drogi. In: S. K. Kozlowski - J. Lech eds.: Erazm
Majewski i warszawska skola prehistoryczna napoczqtku XX wieku, 93-96. Warszawa.
248
CESTY MORAVSKÉ PALEOLITICKÉ ARCHEOLOGIE V OBDOBÎ CESKOSLOVENSKÉ REPUBLIKY
KOZLOWSKI, S. K. 1996b: Jak Stefan Krukowski nauki z archeologii pobieral. In: S: K. Kozlowski - J. Lech
eds.: Erazm Majewski i warszawska skola prehistoryczna na poczqtku XX wieku, 103-110. Warszawa.
KOZLOWSKI, S. K. 2007: Stefan Krukowski. Narodziny giganta. Studia nad gospodark^ surowcami krze-
miennymi w pradziejach, Tom 6. Warszawa.
KOZLOWSKI, S. K. - LECH,}. (eds.) 1996: Erazm Majewski i warszawska skola prehistoryczna na poczqtku
XX wieku. Warszawa.
KRAL, A. B. 1994: K nedozitému jubileu prof. dr. Josefa Skutila, Acta Musei Moraviae, Sei soc. 79,183-187.
KRAMÄR, J. 1972: Setkâni dvou generad archeologü, Vlast. roc. Okr. archiva Blansko 1972,92-94.
KRATOCHVIL, Z. - BOUZEK, J. 1996: Promëny interpretaci. Praha.
KRUKOWSKI, S. 1920: Pierwociny krzemieniarskie gornietwa, transportu i handlu w holocenie Polski.
Wnioski z wlasciwosci surowcôw i wyrobow, Wiadomosci Archeologiczne t. 5,185-206.
KRUKOWSKI, S. 1936: Paleolit sowiniecki z roku 1935, Widamosci Archeologiczne XIV, 116-124.
KRUKOWSKI, S. 1939a: Paleolit - Prehistoria ziem polskichi, z. 1. Krakow.
KRUKOWSKI, S. 1939b: Krzemionki Opatowskie. Warszawa.
KRUKOWSKI, S. - NOWAKOWSKI, A. 1976: Skam 71. Zbiôr rozpraw prahistorycznych. Wrodaw.
KRUMPHANZLOVÂ, Z. 1972,1975: Vÿvoj archéologie v Cechâch a na Moravë, Archeologické studijni ma-
ter iâly 10/1. Praha.
KRUTA, T. 1977: Odesei V. Gross, Vlastivëdny vëstmk moravsky, 39-2,203.
KRÎZ, M. 1889-91: Kùlna a Kostelik L-IIL Brno.
KRÎZ, M. 1891-92: Die Höhlen in den mährischen Devonkalken und ihre Vorzeit. Jahrbuch der k k. geolo-
gischen Reichsanstalt Al, 443-570; 42,463-556, 564-613.
KRlZ, M. 1892: O dobëpravëké, pfedvëké a novovëké na Moravë. Brno.
KRIZ, M. 1897,1899: IJepoque quaternaire en Moravie L, IL, LAnthropologie 8, 513-537 a 10,257-280.
KRÎZ, M. 1898: Ueber die Quartärzeit in Mähren und ihre Beziehungen zur tertiären Epoche, Mitteilungen
der Anthropologischen Gesellschaft in Wien 28,1-34.
KRÎZ, M. 1903: Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Quartärzeit in Mahren. Steinitz.
KRÎZ, M. - KOUDELKA, R 1900,1902: Prüvodce do moravskyeh jeskyn 1, U. Zdänice - Vyskov.
KUCERA, M. 1989: Prinos Jana Eisnera pre Historické Bâdanie na Slovesnku, Zbornik Filozofickej fakulty
Univerzity Komenskeho, Historica, Rocnik XXXIX-XL, 139-157.
KUHN, T. S. 2008: Struktura vëdeckych revoluci. Praha.
KUNA, M. 2012: Interview: Intrasigent archaeology. Interview with Evzen Neustupnÿ on his life in archaeo-
logy, Archaeological Dialogues, Volume 19, Issue 01,3-28 (ceskÿ pfeklad: Neüstupnâ archéologie. S Evze-
nem Neustupnÿm o jeho zivoté v archeologii. Archeologické rozhledy LXV/2014,405-422).
KÜHN, H. 1921: Die Malerei der Eiszeit. München.
KÜHN, H. 1962: Vorgeschichte der menschheit 1. Altsteinzeit und Mittelsteinzeit. Köln.
LAPLACE, G. 1964: Essai de typologie systématique. Annami dettVniversita di Ferrara 15,1-85.
LECH, J. 1992a: V. Gordon Childe a archeologia srodkowej i wschodniej Europy. W stulecie Urodzin, Acta
Archeologica Carpathica XXXI, 5-33.
LECH, J. 1992b: Stefan Krukowski i pocz^tki badah nad pradziejowym görnietwem krzeminia w Polsce
(1991-1939). In.: J. Lech - J. Partika eds.: Prof Stefan Krukowski (1890-1982). Dzialnosc archeologiczna
ijej znaczenie dla nauki polskej, 95-102. Ojcow.
LECH, J. 1996: Erazm Majewski jako archeolog i tradyeja polskich badah epoki kamienia. In: S. K. Kozlow-
ski - J. Lech eds.: Erazm Majewski i warszawska skola prehistoryczna na poczqtku XX wieku, 45-77. Wars-
zawa.
LECH, J. 1998: Between Captivity and Freedom: Polish Archaeology in the 20th Century, Archaeologia Polona
vol. 35-36:1997-1998, 25-222.
LECH, J. 1999a: V. Gordon Childe (1892-1957) w poszukiawaniu zrôdel cywilizacji europejskiej. Zarys biogra-
fiezny. In: J. Lech - F. M. Stepniowski eds.: V Gordon Childe i Archaeologia w XX wieku, 19-66. Warszawa.
LECH, J. 1999b: Marksizm Gordona Childe a czyli archeolog wobec Historii. In: J. Lech - F. M. Stepniowski
eds.: V. Gordon Childe i Archaeologia w XX wieku, 243-266. Warszawa.
249
CESTY MORAVSKÉ PALEOUTICKÉ ARCHEOLOGIE V OBDOBl CF.SKOSLOVENSKÉ REPUBLIKY
LECH, J. 2000: Kultura archeologiczna: z dziejôw jednego pojçncia. In: S Tabaczyriski ed.:, Kultury archeolo-
giczne a rzeczywistôc dziejowa, 151-183. Warszawa.
LECH, J. 2006: Z badan polsko-ukrainskich zwqzkôw w dziedzinie archeologii do II wojny swiatowej, Przeglqd
archeologiczny 54,5-60, Wroclaw.
LECH, J. - PARTYKA, J. (eds.) 1992: Prof. Stefan Krukowski (1890-1982), Dzialnosc archeologiczna ijej
znaczenie dla nauki polskej. Ojcôw.
LECH, J. - PARTKA, J. 2006: Poczÿek polskiej prehistorii w Jurze Ojcowskiej. In: J. Lech - J. Partyka eds.:
Jura Ojcowska w pradziejach i w poczqtkach pahstwa polskiego, 55-83. Ojcôw.
LECH, f. - PIOTROWSKA, D. 2006: Leon Koztowski i jego zwi^zki z Junj Ojcowskij. In: J. Lech - J. Partyka
eds.: Jura Ojcowska w pradziejach i w poczqtkach panstwa polskiego, 159-192. Ojcôw.
LECH, J. - PIOTROWSKA, D. 2009: Leon Kozlowski (1892-1944) an archaeologist who lived in interesting
times, Archaeologia Polona 47/2009,179-209.
LECH, J. - STEPNIOWSKI, F. M. (eds). 1999: V Gordon Childe i Archaeologia w XX wieku. Warszawa.
LELIGDOWICZ, A. 1999: Gustaf Kossinna, jego archeologia, nazizm i Gordon Childe. In: J. Lech - F. M.
Stepniowski eds.: V. Gordon Childe i Archaeologia w XX wieku, 173-221. Warszawa.
LEUBE, A. 2001: Anmerkungen zur Deutschen Prähistorie 1938-1945. Brandenburg und die Slowakei, Slo-
venska archeolögia XLIX, 1-18.
LEUBE, A. - HEGEWISCH, M. (eds.) 2002: Prähistorie und Nationalsozialismus. Die mittel- und osteuro-
päische Ur- und Frühgeschichtsforschung in den Jahren 1933-1945. Heidelberg.
LÉVY-BRUHL, L. 1999: Mysleni clovëka primitivniho. Praha.
LIND-JENSEN, 0.1975: A History of Scandinavian Archeology. London.
MACHATSCHEK, F. 1927: Landeskunde der Sudeten - und Westkarpatenländer. Stuttgart.
MAKKAY, J. 1999: V. Gordon Childe i jego prehistoria z perspektywy wçgierskiej. In:
J. Lech - F. M. Stepniowski eds.: V. Gordon Childe i Archaeologia w XX wieku, 345-358. Warszawa.
MAKOWSKY, A. 1892: Der diluviale Mensch im Löß von Brünn, Mitteilungen der Anthropologischen
Gesellschaft in Wien 22,73-84.
MAKOWSKY, A. 1897: Zur Vorgeschichte. In: Die österreichisch-ungarische Monarchie in Wort und Bild, Bd.
4. Mähren und Schlesien, Sien, 53-67.
MAKOWSKY, A. 1899: Der Mensch der Diluvialzeit Mährens, Festschrift der k. k. technischen Hochschule in
Brünn, 53-67,341-392. Brünn.
MAKOWSKY, A. 1900: Ueber den dilvialen Menschen in Mähren, Mitteilungen der Anthropologischen Ge-
sellschaft in Wien 30, Sitzber, 41-43,45.
MALINA, J. 1980: Archéologie vcera a dnes aneb maji archeologové sedé hmoty vice za nehty nez za usima7.
Ceské Budëjovice. (autorem textû k dëjinâm archéologie je zde Z. Vasicek).
MALINA, J. - VASlCEK, Z. 1990: Archaeology Yesterday and Today: The Development of Archaeology in the
Sciences and Humanities. Cambridge.
MALY, J. 1939: Lebky fossilniho clovëka z Dolnich Vëstonic, Anthropologie 17,171-192.
MALŸ, J. 1949: Jindfich Matiegka. Praha.
MAMZER, H. 1999: V. G. Childe’a idea postçpu jako koncepcja dziejöw. In: J. Lech - F. M. Stepniowski eds.:
V Gordon Childe i Archaeologia w XX wieku, 223-242. Warszawa.
MARYNIAK, B. 1992: Teoretyczne aspekty Skamu 71. In: J. Lech - J. Partika eds.: Prof. Stefan Krukowski
(1890-1982). Dzialnosc archeologiczna i jej znaczenie dla nauki polskej, 233-240. Ojcôw.
MASKA, K. J. 1884,1886: Pravëké nâlezy ve Stramberku I., IL, Casopis Vlasteneckého spolku musejniho v Olo-
mouci 1,1884,15-22,64-69,152-159; 3,1886, 57-65,119-123,163-174.
MASKA, K. J. 1886: Der diluviale Mensch in Mähren. In: Programm der mährischen Landes-Oberrealschule
in Neutitschein für das Schuljahr 1885-1886. Neutitschein.
MASKA, K. ].: Rukopisné deniky I-1V, V-X1V. Pfepis ulozen v archivu AÜ AV CR a v Üstavu Anthropos
MZM.
MASKA, K. J. - OBERMAIER, H. 1911: La station solutréenne de Ondratitz. L Antropologie 22,403-412.
MASKA, 0.1965: Karel Jaroslav Maska. Blansko.
250
CESTY MORAVSKÉ PALEOLÏTICKÉ ARCHEOLOGIE V OBDOBÍ CESKOSLOVENSKÉ REPUBLIKY
MATIEGKA, J. 1924: Pùvod a pocàtky lidstva. Knihy pro kazdého, r. II, sv. 5. Praha.
MATIEGKA, J. 1929a: Dr. Ales Hrdlicka, Anthropologie 7,5-61.
MATIEGKA, J. 1929b: The skull of the fossil man „Brno III“ and the cast of its interior. Anthropologie 7,
90-107.
MATIEGKA, J. 1931: Opüvodu clovéka. Praha.
MATIEGKA, J. 1934,1938: Homo pfedmostensis. Fossilni clovek z Pfedmostí na Moravè I., IL Praha.
MATIEGKA, J. 1935: Jul. Talko-Hryncewicz: Espquisse d’une histoire de l’anthropologie physique en Pologne.
Histoire sommaire des sciences en Pologne. Cracoive, Anthropologie 13,144-145.
MATÚSOVÁ, V. 1986: îng Dr: h. c. Stefan fansàk (14. 9.1886-14. 9.1989). Vyberová personálna bibliografía.
Senica.
MAUSS, M. 1999: Esej o daru, podobè a dùvodech smèny v archaickych spolecnostech. Praha.
MENGHIN, 0.1922: Urgeschichte Niederösterreichs. Wien.
MENGHIN, 0.1926: Einführung in die Urgeschichte Böhmens und Mährens. Reichenberg.
MENGHIN, 0.1931: Weltgeschichte der Steinzeit. Wien.
MECHUROVÁ, Z. 1996: Vÿvoj archéologie na Ostravsku, Archeologické rozhledy XLVIII-4, 565-579.
MËRÎNSKŸ, Z. 1996: Sedmdesát let od úmrtí Václava Capka, Pravék NR 6, 300-301.
MICHNA, P. 1987: Olomouckà archéologie minulého století, Historická Olomouc ajejí soucasné problémy
IV, 143-151.
MIKULKA, J. 1995: K historii Moravského zemského muzea v letech 1945-1949, Acta Musei Moraviae, Sei.
soc. 80, 253-261.
MÍSKOVÁ, A. 2002: Némecká (Karlova) univerzita od Mnichova k 9. kvétnu 1945. Vedení univerzity a obména
profesorského sboru. Praha.
MLEJNEK, O. - SKRDLA, P. - PRICHYSTAL, A. 2012: Ondratice/Zelec - an Early Upper Palaeolithic site
in Central Moravia, Archëologisches Korrespondenzblatt 42,295-314.
MORAVEC, Z. 2012: Archeologická sbírka Ostravského muzea v proménách casu (do r. 2005), Casopis Spo-
lecnosti prátel starozitností 2/2012, 99-118.
MORAWSKI, W. 1992: Komplex stanowisk paleolitycznych w Piekarach. In. J. Lech - J. Partika eds.: Prof.
Stefan Krukowski (1890-1982). Dzialnosc archeologiczna ijejznaczeniedla nauki polskej, 164-172. Ojców.
MOTYKOVÁ, K. 2002: Die Ur- und Frühgeschichtsforschung in Böhmen 1918 - 1945 und die tschechisch-
deutschen Beziehungen. In: A. Leube - M. Hegewisch eds.:, Prähistorie und Nationalsozialismus. Die mit-
tel- und osteuropäische Ur- und Frühgeschichtsforschung in den fahren 1933-1945,603-618. Heidelberg.
MURRAY, T. - EVANS, CH. 2008: Histories of Archaeology. A reader in the History of Archaeology. Oxford.
MUSIL, R. 1972: Stránská skála 1,1910-1945, Studia Musei Moraviae - Anthropos c. 20 (N. S. 12). Brno.
MUSIL, R. 2001: Martin Kriz, jeho zivot a dilo. In: 50 let archeologickych vyzkumu Masarykovy univerzity na
Znojemsku, 127-137. Brno.
MUSIL, R. 2002: Sloupsko-sosüvské jeskynè. Jeskynni bludistë pod Bradinami -jeho historie a vyznam. Brno.
MUSIL, R. 2010: Vypustek - bájná jeskynë u Krtin - její 4001etá historie a vyznam, Acta Speleologica vol.
1/2010. Prûhonice.
MUSIL, R. 2011: Martin Kfíz a Jan Knies. Vyznamní líseñstí krasoví badatelé 19. století. In: P. Krafl a kol.,
Ves Lesno za mëstecko vysazovati racime. Druhé vydání, 130-164.
MUSIL, R. - KARÁSEK, J. - VALOCH, K. 1999: Pleistocén. Historie vyzkumü na území byvalého Cesko-
slovenska, Folia Histórica 69, Faculty od Sciense MU. Brno.
MÜLLER-SCHEESSEL, N. 2011: „.dem Romanismus entgegentreten: National Animosities the Participants
of the Congrès International d’Anthropologie et d’Archéologie Préhistoriques. In: A. Gramsch - U. Som-
mer (eds): A History of Central European Archaeology. Theory, methods, and politics, 57-87. Budapest.
NEKUDA, VI. 1969:150 let Moravského muzea v Brnè. Brno.
NERUDA, P. 1994: Ekonomie vyuzitx suroviny v mladém paleolitu Ostravska. Nepubl. diplomová práce,
FF MU. Brno.
NERUDA, P. - NERUDOVÁ, Z. - SACHEROVÁ, G. - VALOCH, K. 2002: Zpráva o vyzkumu v prostoru j.
Balcarka - Muzeum, Acta Musei Moraviae, Sei. soc. 87,157-170.
251
CESTY MORAVSKÉ PALEOLITICKÉ ARCHEOLOGIE V OBDOBÎ CESKOSLOVENSKÉ REPUBLIKY
NERUDOVÄ, Z. - VALOCH, K. 2009: Moravany nad Vâhom. Katalogpaleolitickych industrie z vyzkumu prof.
Karla Absolona. Anthropos, Studies in Anthropology, Paleoethnology, Palaeontology and Quaternary
Geology, Vol. 28/ N. S. 20/. Brno.
NESVADBIK, Fr. - BOCEK, A. 1913: Moravsky kras aneb âr. Karel Absolon vpravém svëtle. Praha. Vydâno
jako anonym.
NEUGEBAUER-MARESCH, CH. 2008: Palaeolithic research in Austria, Wissenschafliche Mitteilungen aus
dem Niederösterreichischen Landesmuseum 19,7-18.
NEUSTUPNŸ, E. 1976: Paradigmata ve stfedoevropském neolitu a eneolitu - Paradigmata im mitteleuro-
päischen Neolithikum und Äneolithikum. Sbornikprad Filozofické fakulty brnënské university E 20-21,
125-132.
NEUSTUPNŸ, E. 1991: Kam ceskä archéologie?, Archeologické rozhledy 43,361-370.
NEUSTUPNŸ, J. 1931: H. Kühn: Kunst und Kultur der Vorzeit Europas. Das Paläolithikum. Köln 1929, Pa-
màtky archeologické 37,68-69.
NEUSTUPNŸ, J. 1946: Pravêk lidstva. Praha.
NEUSTUPNŸ, J. 1947: Josef Ladislav Pic, Casopis Nârodniho muzea, duchovéd. odd. CXVI, 1-42.
NEUSTUPNŸ, J. 1966: Josef Skutil (7. 3.1904-18.9.1965), Casopis Nârodniho musea CXXXV-1,79-80.
NIEDERLE, L. 1893: Lidstvo v dobèpfedhistorické. Se zvlastnim zfetelem na zemé slovanské. Praha.
NIEDERLE, L. 1910: Kuzniar, W. - Demetrykiewicz, W.: Slady siçdziby czlowieka przedhistorycznego
z okresu paleolitu na görze Bronislawy kolo kopca Kosciuszki pod Krakowem. Krakow 1909, Pamâtky
archeologické XXIV, 196.
NIEDERLE, L. 1914: Demetrikiewicz, W. - Kuzniar, W.: Najstarszy paleolit na ziemiach polskich. Krakow
1914, Pamâtky archeologické XXVI, 139.
NIEDERLE, L. 1919: Kozlowski Leon, Badania archeologiczne na görze Klin w Iwanowicach pow Miechow-
skiego (Prdce Tow. Nauk Varsz. II14), Varsava 1917, Pamâtky archeologické XXXI, 171.
NIEDERLE, L. 1920-1921: Polsky archeologickÿ ruch v letech 1919-1920, Pamâtky archeologické XXXII,
290.
NIEDERLE, L. 1922a: Archeologickÿ ruch v Polsku, Obzor praehistoricky 1,62-64.
NIEDERLE, L. 1922b: Krukowski Stefan: Pierwociny krzemienarskie gôrnictwa, transportu i handlu w ho-
locenie Polski, cz. I. (Wiadom. Archeol. VII. Warszawa 1920), Obzor praehistoricky, rocnik 1,48.
NOURRY, E. (Librairie) 1926: XIIe Congrès International dAnthropologie et dArchéologie Préhistorique.
IIe Session L’Institut International d’Antropologie Prague 14-21 Septembre 1924. Paris.
NOURRY, E. (Librairie) 1933: XVe Congrès International dAnthropologie et dArchéologie Préhistorique.
Ve Session L’Institut International d’Antropologie, Paris 20-27 Septembre 1931. Paris.
NOVOTNŸ, B. 1989: Akademik Jan Eisner - sto rokov od jeho narodenia, Zbornik Filozofickej fakulty Uni-
verzity Komenského, Historica, Rocnik XXXIX-XL, 111-118.
NOVOTNŸ, G. 2012: Jaroslav Bakes (1871-1930). Lékaf na néhoz sezapomnëlo. Brno.
OBERMAIER, H. 1912: Der Mensch der Vorzeit. Berlin
OBERMAIER, H. 1925: Böhmen-Mähren (und Slowakei), A. Paläolithikum. In: Ebert, M. ed.: Reallexikon
der Vorgeschichte 2,55-58.
OBERMAIER, H. 1928: Die ältere Steinzeit. In: J. Schränil, Die Vorgeschichte Böhmens und Mährens, Berlin-
Leipzig, 3-34.
OLIVA, M. 1995: Das Paläolithikum aus der Byci skäla-Höhle, Pravêk NR 5,25-38.
OLIVA, M. 1996a: Spodni paleolitickä vrstva z Byci skäly. K poznäni mytotvornych procesu v nasi speleo-
archeologii, Acta Musei Moraviae, Sei. soc. 81,37-59.
OLIVA, M. 1996b: Mladopaleoliticky hrob Brno II jako prispévek k pocâtkûm samanismu, Archeologické
rozhledy 48,353-383,537-542.
OLIVA, M. 1997: Za Karlem Absolonem, Pravêk NR 7,463-468.
OLIVA, M. 1998: Vÿstava k jubileu profesora Karla Absolona, Acta Musei Moraviae, Sei. soc. 83,179.
OLIVA, M. 2001a: Acta Musei Moraviae. Casopis Moravského muzea. Bibliografkky rejstfik archéologie,
Zprâvy Ceské archeologické spolecnosti, Supplément 44. Praha.
252
CESTY MORAVSKÊ PALEOLITICKÉ ARCHEOLOGIE V OBDOBÎ CESKOSLOVENSKÉ REPUBLIKY
OLIVA, M. 2001b: Karel Absolon 1877-1960 (tiskk vystavë MZM 2001). Brno.
OLIVA, M. 2002: Dvojité jubileum Karla Jaroslava Masky (1851-1916) trochu aktuâlnëji (se soupisem sbirky),
Pravëkm 11/2001,401-421.
OLIVA, M. 2003a: K vyroci Alexandra Makowského, Pravèk NR 13/2003,467-471.
OLIVA, M, 2003b: 150 let od narozeni Josefa Szombathyho (1853-1943), Pravèk NR 13/2003,471-476.
OLIVA, M. 2003c: Pohrebistë kromanoncû v Mladecskych jeskynich, Archeoïogické pamâtky strednï Moravy
sv. 6. Olomouc.
OLIVA, M. 2005: Civilizace moravského paleolitu a mezolitu. Brno.
OLIVA, M. 2007a: Gravettien na Moravë. ln J. Klâpstë, Z. Mërinskÿ eds.: Dissertationes archaeologicae Bru-
mmes/Pragensesque 1,1-257. Brno-Praha.
OLIVA, M. 2007b: Snahy a prohry prof. Karla Absolona za IL svëtové vâlky, Sbornik Muzea Blansko 2007,
133-142.
OLIVA, M. 2010: Pravëké hornictvi v Krumlovském lese. Vznik a vyvoj industriâlnè-sakrâlni krajiny najizni
Moravë. Anthropos. Vol. 32 /N. S. 24/. Brno.
OLIVA, M. 2014: Dolni Vëstonice I (1922-1942). Hans Freising - Karel Absolon - Assien Bohmers. Anthropos
Vol. 37 (N. S. 29). Brno.
OLIVA, M. - KOSTRHUN, P. 2008: Gordon Childe Karlu Absolonovi v roce 1928. Acta Musei Moraviae,
Sei. soc. 63,159-160.
OLIVA, M. - KOSTRHUN, P. 2009: Obrazy z vyzkumu moravského paleolitu. Brno.
PALACIO-PÉREZ, E. 2010: Salomon Reinach and the religious interpretation of Palaeolithic art, Antiquity
vol. 84, No. 325,853-863.
PARTYKA, J. 1992: Ojcow i archeologia wlatach 1871-1924. In: J. Lech - J. Partika eds.: Prof. Stefan Kru-
kowski (1890-1982). Dzialnosc archeologiczna i jej znaezenie dla nauki polskej. Ojcow, 71-86.
PASTERNAK, J. 1923a: Krukowski Stefan: Pierwociny krzemienarskie gôrnictwa, transportu i handlu w ho-
locenie Polski, cz. II. (Wiadom. Archeol. VII. Warszawa 1922, str. 34-57), Obzorpraehistoricky, roënik
II, se§it 1,53.
PASTERNAK, J. 1923b: Sawicki L., Przyczynek do znajomosci techniki obröbki krzemienia (Viadom.
Archeolo. VII. Warszawa 1922, str. 58-77), Obzorpraehistoricky, rocnik II, sesit 1,53.
PASTERNAK, J. 1923c: Erazm Majewski, Obzor praehistoricky II, 159-160.
PASTERNAK, J. 1923d: Kozlowski Leon Dr.: Groby megalityczne na wschod od Odry. Prâce i Materjaly an-
trop-archeol. i etogr., Krakow 1921, Pamâtky archeoïogické 33,359.
PENCK, A. - BRÜCKNER, E. 1901-1909: Die Alpen im Eiszeitalter. 3 Bände. Leipzig.
PERNES, J. 1979: Kniesovo muzeum Moravského krasu ve Sloupë, Sb. Okresniho vlastivëdného muzea v Blan-
sku 11,24-32.
PESTÄL, F. 1935-1936: Nové doklady pravëkého osidleni na Trebicsku, Od Horâcka k Podyji 11,23-25.
PEYRONY, D. 1933: Les industies „aurignaciennes“ dans le bassin de la Vézère. Aurignacien et Périgordien,
Bull Soc, Préhist. Franc. 30, 543-559.
PlC, J. L. 1899-1909: Starozitnosti zemë Geské, Dil 1-3. Praha.
PIC, J. L. 1906: Le Hradischt de Stradonitz en Bohême / Josef Ladislav Pic; ouvrage traduit du tchèque par Joseph
Déchelette. Leipzig.
PIOTROWSKA, D. 1998: Biskupin 1933-1996: archaeology, politics and nationalism, Archaeologia Polona
vol. 35-36:1997-1998,255-186,
PIOTROWSKA, D. 2004: Biskupin - idéologie - kultura. In: B. Gediga - W. Piotrowski eds.: Archeologia,
kultura, idéologie, Prace Komisji Archeologicznej PAN Nr. 15 - Biskupinskie Prace Archeologiczne Nr 3,
91-155. Biskupin-Wroclaw.
PIOTROWSKA, D. 2006a: Stefan Krukowski, Jura Ojcowska i archeologia w swietle listöw i dokumentöw ze
zbioröw pahstwowego Muzeum Archeologieznego w Warszawie, In: J. Lech - J. Partyka eds.: Jura Ojcow-
ska w pradziejach i wpoczqtkach panstwa polskiego, 194-224. Ojcow.
PIOTROWSKA, D. 2006b: Instytucje II rzeczypospolitej chroni^ce zabytky archeologiczne na zachodniej
Ukrainie, Przeglqd archeologiczny 54,61-98.
253
CESTY MORAVSKÉ PALEOLITICKÉ ARCHEOLOGIE V OBDOBf CESKOSLOVENSKÉ REPUBLIKY
PIOTROWSKA, D. 2008: Prolegomena do archeologii Biskupina, Tom I, Bibliografie archeologiczna Biskupina
1933-1983.
PLEINER, R. - RYBOVÄ, A. (eds.) 1978: Pravèké dèjiny Cech. Praha.
PODBORSKŸ, VI. 1991:50 let od ümrti Antonina Gottwalda, Pravék NR 1,158-159.
PODBORSKŸ, VI. 1993a: Dvë vyroci prof. Emanuela Simka, Pravék NR 3,316.
PODBORSKŸ, VI. 1993b: Emanuel Simek a evropskâ prehistoric, Casopis Matice moravské 112-2,311-318.
PODBORSKŸ, VI. 1994a: K nedozitÿm devadesâtinâm prof. Dr. Josefa Skutila, Pravék NR 4,393-394.
PODBORSKŸ, VI. 1994b: Vÿvoj péce o archeologické pamâtky na Moravë, Pravék NR 4,347-361.
PODBORSKŸ, VI. 1994c: Z dëjin a soucasnosti katedry archéologie FF MU, Pravék NR 4,365-367.
PODBORSKŸ, VI. 1995: Josef Skutil - prehistorik a archeolog, Vlastivëdny vëstnik moravsky 1995/3,
296-299.
PODBORSKŸ, VI. 1997a: Dèjiny pravèku a rané doby dëjinné. Brno.
PODBORSKŸ, VI. 1997b: Franz Cupik, Pravék NR 711997,468.
PODBORSKŸ, VI. 1999: V. Gordon Childe w Czechoslowacji. Wspomnienie. In: J. Lech - F. M. Stepniowski
eds.: V. Gordon Childe i Archeologia w XX wieku. Warszawa.
PODBORSKŸ, VI. 2002a: 50 let od smrti I. L. Cervinky(l. 2.1869-3.10.1952).Projevpfiotevirânicestného
hrobu I. L. Cervinky v Brestu 31. rijna 2002, Pravék NR 12,440-444.
PODBORSKŸ, VI. 2002b: Osmdesât let od smrti Jaroslava Palliardiho, Pravék NR 12,434-489.
PODBORSKŸ, VI. 2004: Ideologiehaltigkeit und Ideologielosigkeit der böhmischen und mährischen
Archéologie. In: B. Gediga - W. Piotrowski eds.: Archeologia, kultura, idéologie, Prace Komisji Archeolo-
gicznej PAN Nr, 15 - Biskupihskie Präce Archeologiczne Nr. 3, 232-241. Biskupin-Wroclaw.
PODBORSKŸ, Vl. 2005a: Zapominany Moritz/Mauritius Wilhelm Trapp (24. 1. 1825-27. 5. 1895), Pravék
NR 15/2005,467-468.
PODBORSKŸ, VI 2005b: Frantisek Vildomec (6.2.1878-3.11.1975), Vëdomil Vildomec (27. 9.1921-28.12.
1998). Pravëk - postavy moravské archéologie 2. Brno.
PODBORSKŸ, VI. - KOVÂRNÎK, J. 2012: Jaroslav Palliardi (20. 2. 1861-12. 3. 1922). Pokrokovy kulturni
ëinitel jihozâpadni Moravy a vëhlasny archeolog evropského jména. Pravëk - postavy moravské archéo-
logie 3. Brno.
PODBORSKŸ, VI. - RAJCHL, R. 2005: Zapomenutÿ uherskobrodsky polyhistor prof. Frantisek Rajchl (23.1.
1865-18.2.1938), Pravëk NR 15/2005,473-475.
PODPËRA, J. 1929: Rostlinstvo mamuti epochy v Euroasii, Priroda 22,181-183.
POKORNŸ, M. 1947: Doc. Dr. Alois Stehlik, Acta Musei Moraviae 33 - 1/1946,35-39.
POKORNŸ, M. 1953: Universitni profesor RNDr. Karel Zapletal padesâtnikem, Acta Musei Moraviae, Sei.
nat. 38, 9-13.
POKORNŸ, P. 2010: Necekané moznosti pylové analÿzy ve vztahu k archeologii, Zivâ archéologie 11,26-31.
POLLA, B. 1989: K zaciatkom archéologie na Slovensku, Archeologia historica 14,491-503.
POLLA, B, 1996: Archeologia na Slovesnku v minulosti. Martin.
PROCHÄZKOVÄ, P. 2001: Archéologie na Olomoucku v minulosti. In: M. Béhm a kol. Archeologické zrcad-
leni, 11-26. Olomouc.
PROCHÄZKOVÄ, P. 2002: Casopis Vlasteneckého spolku muzejniho v Olomouci. Bibliograficky rejstrik
archéologie, Zprâvy Ceské archeologické spolecnosti Supplément 47. Praha.
PROSEK, Fr. 1947: Paleolitické osidleni Cech ve svëtle nejnovëjsich nâlezû, Casopis Nârodniho musea 106,
1-13.
PROSEK, Fr. 1953: Szeletien na Slovensku, Slovenskâ archeologia 1,133-194.
PROSEK, Fr. 1961: Mladopaleolitickâ obydli v Ceskoslovensku, Pamâtky archeologické 52,57-75.
PRUDKÄ, A. 1999: Antonín Gottwald (1869-1941), Pravëk NR 9,464-467.
PRIBYL, L. 1976: Sto let prof. K. Absolona, Ceskoslovensky kras 28,6-12.
PURKYNË, C. 1911: Alpy ve vëku ledovém, Sbornik ceské spolecnosti zemëpisné 17,1-30.
RATAJ, J, - SOLLE, M. - VENCL, Si. 2003: Vzpominky pracovnikû Stâtniho archeologického üstavu v Praze,
Archeologické rozhledy LV, 139-166.
254
CESTY MORAVSKÉ PALEOLITICKÉ ARCHEOLOGIE V OBDOBÍ CESKOSLOVENSKÉ REPUBLIKY
RATZEL, F. 1882-1891: Anthropo-geographie oder Grundzüge der Anwendung der Erdkunde auf die Geschichte.
Stuttgard.
R4CZKOWSKI, W. 2012: The „German School of Archaeology“ in its Central European Context: Sinful
Thoughts. In: A. Gramsch - U. Sommer eds: A History of Central European Archaeology. Theory; methods,
and politics, 197-214. Budapest.
REINACH, S. 1903: L art et la magie. A propos des peintures et les gravures de 1 Age du Renne, L Anthropo-
logie 14,257-266.
REMES, M. 1927: Nékteré nálezy v miocénu a diluviu u Hranic, Casopis Vlastivédného spolku musejního
v Oloumouci XXXVIII, 54-55.
REMES, M. 1929: Jeskyné v devonském vápenci Hranického kopce, Casopis Vlastivédného spolku musejního
v Oloumouci XLI-XLII, 101-104.
RENFREW, C. 1973: Before Civilization. The radiocarbon revolution and prehistoric Europe. London.
RENFREW, C. 2009: Prehistoria. Formovanie tudskej mysle. Bratislava.
RIEDEL, L. 1947: Ctení o profesoru Karlu Absolonovi, Národní obroda 26. 6.1947. Brno.
ROBERTSHAW, P. (ed.) 1990: A History of African Archaeology. Oxford.
RUBÍN, J. 1977a: Karel Absolon jako geograf a velká osobnost ceské prírodovédy, Sborník Ceskoslovenské
spolecnosti zemépisné 82/2,103-124.
RUBÍN, J. 1977b: 100. vyrocí narození premozitele Macochy, Lidé a zemé 25,261-264.
RUSEK, J. 1977: The Centinial of Prof. Dr. K. Absolon birthday, Revue décologie et de biologie du sol 14,
263-266.
RZEHAK, A. 1912: Die prähistorischen Bewohner Mährens. Zeitschrift des Deutschen Vereines für di Geschichte
Mährens und Schlesiens 16,214-234.
RZEHAK, A. 1913: Skizze der Prähistorie Mährens, Mitteilungen der Anthropologischen Gesellschaft in Wien
43,62-64.
SALAC, V. 2006: Nástin déjin archeologie na univerzitách v ceskych zemich do druhé svétové války, Studia
mediaevalia Prageusia 7 (Na prahu poznání ceskych déjin - Sborník prací k poeté Jirího Slámy), 131-155.
Praha.
SAWICKI, L. 1949: Rozwój badari w zakresie prehistorii czwartorz^du w Polsce, Sprawozdania Panstwowego
muzeum archeologicznego 2,1948-49,1-18.
SEDLÁCKOVÁ, S. 2007: Opatrovnice Karla Absolona - Lude Bakesová, Sborník muzea Blansko 2007,
175-187. Blansko.
SCHEUFLER, P. 2013: Osobnosti fotografié v ceskych zemích do roku 1918. Praha.
SCHILD, R. 1992: Taksonomia wedle Krukowskiego. In: J. Lech - J. Partika eds.: Prof. Stefan Krukowski
(1890-1982). Dzialnosc archeologiczna ijej znaezenie dla nauki polskej, 95-102. Ojcow.
SCHILD, R. 1998: Stefan Krukowski (1890-1982): a reclusive eccentric within the archaeological establish-
ment, Archaeologia Polona 35-36,343-356.
SCHILD, R. 2000: Stefan Krukowski (1890-1982) i jego mysl teoretyezna. In: S. Tabaczynski ed.: Kultury
archeologiczne a rzeczywistóc dziejowa, PAN - Komitet pra -i protohistoryeznyeh práce, Tom IV, 31-42.
Warszawa.
SCHIRMEISEN, K. 1923: Die Vorgeschichtliche Besiedlung des Brünner gebietes. Monatschr. Für naturwis-
senschaftliche Fortbildung XIX, 1923.
SCHIRMEISEN, K. 1924: Mähren zur Eiszeit. Brünn.
SCHIRMEISEN, K. 1925: Neue eiszeitliche Funde in der Stierfels- und in der Backofenhöhle. Zeitschrift des
Deutschen Vereines für die Geschichte Mährens und Schlesiens 27,70-80.
SCHIRMEISEN, K. 1927: Zur Altersfrage des Ochoser Unterkiefers, Zeitschrift des Deutscshen Vereines für
die Geschichte Mährens und Schlesiens 29,63-77.
SCHIRMEISEN, K. 1931: Die Kunst der Eiszeit und die zweite Venus von Wisternitz. Mitt. Über Höhlen-
und Karstforschung. Ztschr. des Hauptverbandes Deutscher Höhlenforscher Jahrg. 1931, H. 4, sep. 12s.
SCHIRMEISEN, K. 1932a: Zur Frage der altsteinzeitlichen Besiedlung des Lateiner Berges, Sudeta 8,1-3.
SCHIRMEISEN, K. 1932b: Obsidiangeräte unter dem Mikroskop, Sudeta 8, 90-92.
255
CESTY MORAVSKÉ PALEOLITICKÉ ARCHEOLOGIE V OBDOBÎ CESKOSLOVENSKÉ REPUBUKY
SCHIRMEISEN, K. 1936: Probleme der mährischen Altsteinzeit, Zeitschrift des Deutschen Vereines für die
Geschichte Mährens und Schlesiens 38,138-156.
SCHRÄNIL, J. 1928: Vorgeschichte Böhmens und Mährens. Berlin - Leipzig.
SCHULTZ, A. H. 1945: Biological Memoir of Ales Hrdlicka, Biological Mémoires of the National Academy of
Sciens, vol. 23, Memoir 12,305-338. Washington.
SCHÜTZ, L. 1928: Die Feier zur Erinnerung an die 50. Wiederkehr des Todestages von Prof. Dr, C. Fuhlrott.
In: 0. Hauser ed.: Neue Dokumente zur Menschheitsgeschichte. Vol I. Weimar.
SIMON, J. 1956: Die Zaubergrotten im Mährischen Karst. Geheimnisse im Schloße der Erde. Heidelberg.
SKLENÂR, K. 1969: Nâstin vÿvoje prehistorického bâdâni v Cechâch do roku 1919, Zprävy cs. Spolecnosti
archeologické, rocnikXI-1969, sesit 1-3.
SKLENÂR, K. 1970a: Obzor praehistoricky 1910-1950. Bibliografickÿ rejstfik casopisu, Zprävy Cs. spolecnosti
archeologické, Supplément 1970.
SKLENÂR, K. 1970b: Ceskÿ archeologickÿ klub, Zprâvy Cs. spolecnosti archeologické XII, 87-91.
SKLENÂR, K. 1974: Ucenci apohané. Pëtadvacetpfïbêhù z dèjin ceské archéologie. Praha.
SKLENÂR, K. 1975: Palaeolithic and Mesolithic Dwellings: Problems of Interpretation, Pamâtky archeologické
66, 266-304.
SKLENÂR, K. 1976: Vÿvoj prehistorické védy v Evropë. In: J. Bouzek - M. Buchvaldek - P. Kostomitsopou-
los - K. Sklenâf: Dèjiny archéologie, 7-122. Praha.
SKLENÂR, K. 1977: Nejstarsi lidskâ obydli v Ceskoslovensku. Praha.
SKLENÂR, K. 1979: Objevitelé zlatého vëku. Praha.
SKLENÂR, K. 1981: Jan Erazim Vocel. Zakladatel ceské archéologie. Praha.
SKLENÂR, K. 1983a: Druzina profesora Pice. Sbornik Nârodniho muzea, fada A - Historie, XLVII, 1-50.
SKLENÂR, K. 1983b: Archaeology in Central Europe: the first 500 years. Leicester,
SKLENÂR, K. 1983c: Vÿvoj prehistorické védy v Evropë. In: J. Bouzek - M. Buchvaldek - P. Kostomitsopou-
los - K. Sklenâr: Dèjiny archéologie 7,7-121. Praha.
SKLENÂR, K. 1984: Vÿvoj poznâni pravëku a rané doby déjinné v ceskÿch zemich. In: J. Bouzek - M. Bu-
chvaldek - P. Kostomitsopoulos - K. Sklenâr: Dèjiny archéologie II, 7-69. Praha.
SKLENÂR, K. 1985: Zajeskynnim clovëkem. Praha.
SKLENÂR, K. 1989: Z Cech do Pompeji. Praha.
SKLENÂR, K. 1991: Kdo byl Lothar Zotz? (Kapitola z dëjin vÿzkumu Ceského krasu), Speleo 6/1991,
15-20.
SKLENÂR, K. 1993: Z dëjin nëmecké univerzity. Vztah védy a idéologie v pfibëhu Lothara Zotze, Vesmir
72/2,453-455.
SKLENÂR, K. 1995: Slepé ulicky archéologie. Komârov.
SKLENÂR, K. 1997a: Bibliografie nëmecké archéologie v Cechâch a na Moravë - III. Sudeta (1925-1942),
IV. Altböhmen und Altmähren (1941-1942), Zprâvy Ceské archeologické spolecnosti, Supplément 30.
Praha.
SKLENÂR, K. 1997b: Bibliografie nëmecké archéologie v Cechâch a na Moravë - V. Mannus (1919-1942),
VI. Nachrichtenblatt für Deutsche Vorzeit (1925-1943), Zprâvy Ceské archeologické spolecnosti, Supplé-
ment 31. Praha.
SKELNÀR, K. 2000: Pfiroda a Vëda pfirodni. Archéologie v pfirodovëdnÿch casopisech II - Bibliografickÿ
rejstfik. Zprâvy Ceské archeologické spolecnosti, Supplément 39. Praha.
SKLENÂR, K. 2001: Obraz vlasti. Pribëh Nârodniho muzea. Praha.
SKLENÂR, K. 2003: Bohové, hroby a ucitelé. Cesty ceskych spisovatelù do pravëku. Praha.
SKLENÂR, K. 2005: Biograficky slovnik ceskych, moravskych a slezskych archeologù. Praha.
SKLENÂR, K. 2007: „Otec ceské archéologie“ Josef Dobrovskÿ a polské starozitnosti. In: M. Glosek - J. Maik
eds.: Od pradziejôw do wspôlczesnosc: archeologiczne wçdrôwki: studia dedykowane Pani Profesor Marii
Magdalenie Blombergowej, 101-105. Lodz.
SKLENÂR, K. 2008: Dèjiny vÿzkumu stars! a stfedni doby kamenné (paleolitu a mezolitu) v ceskÿch zemich,
Sbornik Nârodniho muzea v Praze, fada A - historié, 62/2-4.
256
CESTY MORAVSKÉ PALEOUTICKÉ ARCHEOLOGIE V OBDOBl CESKOSLOVENSKÉ REPUBLIKY
SKLENÂR, K. 2011a: Josef Ladislav Pic jako redaktor Pamâtekarcheologickych (kstému vyroci jeho ümrti),
Pamâtky archeologické Cil, 5-20.
SKLENÂR, K. 201 lb: Vÿbërovâ bibliografie k dëjinâm evropské archéologie - pravëk a ranÿ Stredovëk, Zprâvy
Ceské archeologické spolecnosti, Supplément 82.
SKLENÂR, K. 2011c: Vÿvoj péce o archeologické pamâtky v ceskych zemich do roku 1989 I. a II., Sbornik
Nârodniho muzeavPraze, fada A - historié, 65/1-4.
SKLENÂR, K. 2013a: Z historié archeologickych sjezdû, Zprâvy ceské archeologické spolecnosti, Supplément
88. Praha.
SKLENÂR, K. 2013b: O rodu a rodinë archeologa Jaroslava Palliardiho, Studia Archeaeologica Brunensia 18,
2,79-83.
SKLENÂR, K. 2014: „Starâ myslenka“ Ke 170. vyroci tridobé periodizace v ceské Archeologii, Archeologické
rozhledy 2/2014. Praha.
SKUTIL, J. 1924a: Schirmeisen Karl, Mähren zur Eiszeit, Brünn 1924, Pamâtky archeologické 34, 305.
SKUTIL, J. 1924b: Schirmeisen Karl, Mähren zur Eiszeit, Brünn 1924, Obzor praehistoricky III, sesit 2,
144-145.
SKUTIL, J. 1924c: Die Vorgeschichtliche Besiedlung des Brünner gebietes. Monatschr. Für naturwissens-
chaftliche Fortbildung XIX, 1923, Obzor praehistoricky III, sesit 2,145.
SKUTIL, J. 1926-28: Bayer J., Neue palaeolithische Funde in mährischen Höhlen, Die Eiszeit 1,1924,167 f.,
2 Abb., Pamâtky archeologické 35,287.
SKUTIL, J. 1927a: Dr. O. Hauser, Obzor praehistoricky V-VI (1926-1927), 132-133.
SKUTIL, J. 1927b: Slovensky paleolit, Sbornik Muzeälnej slovenskej spolocnosti 21, 39-48. Turciansky Sv.
Martin.
SKUTIL, J. 1927c: Vaclav Capek, Casopis Vlasteneckého musejniho spolku v Olomouci 38,52-53.
SKUTIL, J. 1928a: Les trouvailles mésolithiques en Europe Centrale, IlAnthropologie 38,444-446.
SKUTIL, J. 1928b: Geografické rozsireni solutréenu, Bratislava 2,166-180.
SKUTIL, J. 1930: Revise nëkterÿch ménë znâmÿch a pochybnÿch palaeolithickych nâlezû Ceskych, Bratislava
4,710-728.
SKUTIL, J. 1931a: Zemrelÿ J. Bayer o historii tzv. Vëstonické venuse c. II, Priroda 24,251-254.
SKUTIL, J. 1931b: Diluviâlni clovëk ve Slezsku, Vëstnik Matice Opavské 36,1-20.
SKUTIL, J. 1931c: Rudolfe Janovského paleolitické nâlezy na Holesovsku, Nase Valassko III, 77-89.
SKUTIL, J. 1932: Mezinârodni kongres „Asociace pro Studium evropského quartéru“ v Rusku, Priroda 25/10,
351-353.
SKUTIL, J. 1933: Musejni péce Sovëtského svazu, Priroda 26/1,23-25.
SKUTIL, J. 1934-35: Übersicht der mährischen paläolithischen Funde, Swiatowit 16,47-78.
SKUTIL, J. 1936: Zur Frage der „mesolithischen“ Funde aus der Tschechoslowakei, Przeglqd archeologiczny
5/1933-1936,159-167.
SKUTIL, J. 1938: Paleoliükum Slovenska a Podkarpatskej Rusi. Turciansky Sväty Martin.
SKUTIL, J. 1938b: Pravèké nâlezy v Mladci u Litovle na Moravè. Litovel.
SKUTIL, J. 1938-39: Paleolitikum v Ceskoslovensku. Zvlâstni otisk z Obzoru praehistorického 11/1938,
a 12/1939. Novy Bydzov.
SKUTIL, J. 1939: Pocâtky prehistorie u nas, Vëda a zivoU 346-352.
SKUTIL, J. 1939-46: Staropaleolitické nâlezy z Moravy, Pamâtky archeologické 42,2-9.
SKUTIL, J. 1941: Zur Geschichte der Altsteinzeitforschung in Böhmen-Mähren in der Slowakei, Altböhmen
und Altmähren 1,20-37.
SKUTIL, J. 1946: Z nejdâvnëjsi minulosti Slezska, Sbornik Slezsko, cesky stât a ceskâ kultura, Matice Opavskä
vOpavë, 13-26.
SKUTIL, J. 1949: Za docentem Dr. Aloisem Stehlikem, Ceskoslovensky kras II/5,3-5.
SKUTIL, J. 1951: Prvni historické zprâvy o diluviâlnich nâlezech v Predmosti, Vlastivédny vêstnik moravsky
6,1-12, 33-46, 65-89.
SKUTIL, J. 1959: Dr. M. Remes a moravskâ spéléologie, Ceskoslovensky kras 12,228-229.
257
CESTY MORAVSKÉ PALEOLITICKÉ ARCHEOLOGIE V OBDOBÎ CESKOSLOVENSKÉ REPUBLIKA
SKUTIL, J. 1960a: Liskova archeologickâ sbirka. Brno.
SKUTIL, J. 1960b: Liskovy paleolitické sbëry z Predmosti, Anthropozoikum 10,113-127.
SKUTIL, J. 1965: Bibliografie moravského pleistocénu 1850-1950. Brno.
SKUTIL, J. 1967: Styky polskych a ceskoslovenskÿch archeologû a prehistoriku, Acta Universitatis Wratisla-
viensis 56,57-72.
SKUTIL, J. 1974: Jan Knies (1860-1937), Sb. Okresniho vlastivèdného muzea v Blansku 6-7,177-182.
SKUTIL, J. ml. 1969: Bibliografie dila univ. prof. dr. Josefa Skutila. Lomnice u Tisnova.
SKUTIL, J. ml. 1972: Kapitola z archeologického deniku mého otce z roku 1919, Sb. Okr. vl. musea v Blansku
4,85-90.
SKUTIL, J. ml. 1975: Archeologicky denik Josefa Skutila z let 1920-1924, Vlastivèdnâ rocenka Okr. archivu
v Blansku 1975,55-68.
SKUTIL, J. ml. 1980: Pamatce prof. Dr. Josefa Skutila, Sb. Okresniho muzea v Blansku 12,92-98.
SKUTIL, Josef - SKUTIL, Jan 1967: Moravsky kras ve své kulturni historii a v beletrii. Blansko.
SMEJKAL, B. 1947: Osmdesâtiny dra Morice Remese, jednoho z nejzaslouzilejsich olomouckÿch vëdcü,
Vlastivëdny vêstnik moravsky 2,187-189.
SMITH, G. E. 1938: Déjiny clovëka. Praha.
SMITH, P. J. 1998: „A passionate connoisseur of flints“: an intellectual biography of the young Grahame
Clark based on his pre-war publications, Archaeologia Polona vol. 35-36:1997-1998,385-408.
SMYCKA, J. 1922: Nâlez diluviâlniho clovëka v Mladci u Litovle na Moravë, Obzor praehistoricky 1/1922,
111-120.
SNÄSIL, R. 1971: Z dëjin archéologie stfedniho Pomoravi, Z déjin Slovanû na üzemi CSSR, 28-41. Uherské
Hradistë.
SOBCZYK, K. 1984: Modes de débitage dans le Magdalénien d’Europe centrale. VAnthropologie 88,309-326.
SOERGEL, W. 1919: Lösse, Eiszeiten undpaläolitische Kulturen. Jena.
SOMMER, U. 2004: Die Lausitzer Kultur - Hermanem, Illyrer oder Sorben? Etnische Deutungen der
sächsischen Vorgeschichte im 19. un frühen zwanzigsten Jahrhundert. In: B. Gediga - W. Piotrowski eds.:
Archeologia, kultura, idéologie, Prace Komisji Archeologicznej PAN Nr. 15 - Biskupinskie Präce Archeolo-
giczne Nr. 3, 57-72. Biskupin-Wroclaw.
SOUKUP, V. 2004: Dëjiny antropologie. Praha.
SOUKUP, V. 2011: Antropologie. Teorie clovëka a kultury. Praha.
STEHLÎK, A. 1931: Clovëk a nejdûlezitëjsi fauna ssavci v moravském diluviu, Pfiroda 24,210-214.
STEHLÎK, A. 1934: Fossilni ssavci ze Strânské skâly u Brna, Prâce Moravského prirodovëdeckého klubu v Brnë
sv. 93.
STEHLÎK, A. 1935: Kritické poznâmky k Schirmeisenovë zprâvë o prâd Dra. Stehlika: „Fossilni ssavci ze
Strânské skâly u Brna“, Pfiroda 28,200-203.
STOCKŸ, A. 1922: Nâlez diluviâlni (?) lebky v Broken Hillu v Africe, Obzor praehistoricky 1/2,122-123.
STOCKŸ, A. 1923a: V. Gordon Childe: The East European relations of the Dimini culture. Journ. of Helenic
Studies, vol. XLII 1922, str. 254-275, Obzor praehistoricky r. II, sesit 2,144-152.
STOCKY, A. 1923b: Kossinna Gustaf: Die Indogermanen. Ein Abriss. I. Teil. Mannus-Bibliothek Nro. 26.
Leipzig 1921, Pamdtky archeologické 33,189-190.
STOCKŸ, A. 1923c: Prednâska prof. Henry Breuila v Praze, Obzor praehistoricky 11/1923, c. 1,75.
STOCKY, A. 1924a: Leon Koziowski, Epoka kamienia na wydmach wschodniej czçsci wyzyny Malopolskiej.
Archivum nauk anthropologicznych, Lwow-Warszawa 1923, Pamâtky archeologické 34,291-293.
STOCKY, A. 1924b: Hoernes-Menghin, Urgeschichte der bildenden Kunst in Europa von den Anfängen bis
um 500 vor Christi, Videh 1925, Pamâtky archeologické 34,299-303.
STOCKŸ, A. 1924c: Hoernes-Menghin, Urgeschichte der bildenden Kunst in Europa von den Anfängen bis
um 500 vor Christi, Videh 1925. III vydäni. 864 stran, 1462 vyobr. Videh 1925. Obzor praehistoricky III,
sesit 2,156-167.
STOCKŸ, A. 1924d: Le développement de la science préhistorique tchèque; In: L’histoire des sciences antro-
pologiques en Tchécoslovaquie, Antropologie (Praha) II, Supplément, 45-56.
258
CESTY MORAVSKÉ PALEOLITICKÊ ARCHEOLOGIE V OBDOBÎ ¿ESKOSLOVENSKÊ REPUBLIKY
STOCKŸ, A. 1926: Pravëk zemë Ceské L Vëk kamenny. Praha.
STOCKY, A. 1926-1927: W Soergel: Josef Bayers Chronologie des Eiszeitalters. Eine kritische Betrachtung.
Mannus XIX, 1927,225-250, Pamâtky archeologické 35,648-649.
STOCKY, A. 1927: V. Gordon Childe, The Dawn of European Civilisation. Londyn 1925, Obzor praehistoricky
roc. V.-VI., 84-106.
STOCKŸ, A. 1931a: Gustaf Kossinna, Pamâtky archeologické 37,95-96.
STOCKŸ, A. 1931b: 0. Menghin, Weltgeschichte der Steinzeit. Str. I-XVI+648, Viden 1931. Pamâtky archeo-
logické 37,65-67.
STOCKŸ, A. 1936: 0. Menghin: Weltgeschichte der Steinzeit. Str. I-XVI, 648; tb I-L, 7 map. Videh 1931,
Obzor praehistoricky IX (1930-1935), 220-235.
STOLPIAK, B. 1984: Rozwoj prehistorii polskiej w okresie 20-lecia miçdzywojennego. Poznan,
STOLYHWO, K. 1928: La race néanderthalienne est-elle homogène?, Anthropologie 6,61-76.
STOLYHWO, K. 1936: In memoriam profesora Juljana Talko-Hryncewicze, Anthropologie 14,101-104.
STUCHLÎK, S. 1993: Vzpominka na Rudolfa Janovského, Pravëk NR 3,319-320.
STUMPF, G. 1926: Eiszeitliche Funde am Gilschwitzerberge in Troppau, Nachrichtenblatt für deutsche Vorzeit
3,42.
SULGOSTOWSKA, Z. 1992: Profesor Stefan Krukowski - badacz schylkowopaleolitycznych pracowni krze-
mieniarskich w Gulinie i Noblu. In: J. Lech - J. Partika eds.: Prof Stefan Krukowski (1890-1982). Dzialnosc
archeologiczna ijej znaczenie dla nauki polskej. Ojcow, 173-178.
SVOBODA, J. 1994: Pfedmosti after 110 years, Journal of Field Archaeology 21,457-472.
SVOBODA, J. 2000: Dolni Vëstonice - Pavlov. Historie a soucasnost archeologického fenoménu, JizniMorava
36,21-44.
SVOBODA, J. 2011: Pocâtky umëni. Academia.
SVOBODA, J. - HAVLÎCEK, P. - LOZEK, V. - MACOUN, J. - MUSIL, R. - PRICHYSTAL, A. - SVOBODO-
VÄ, H. - VLCEK, E. 2002: Paleolit Moravy a Slezska, 2. aktual. vydâni, DVS sv. 8. Brno.
SŸKORA 1911: Kapitolyza ocistu Mor: Krasu. Brno.
SZAFRANSKI, E, Z. 1999: „Wszechmocny“ wplywkultur Bliskiego Wschodu na pradzieje Europy (Z historii
rozwazari Verea Gordona Childe a). In: J. Lech. - F. M. Stepniowski eds.: V. Gordon Childe i Archaeologia
wXX wieku, 159-165. Warszawa.
SZCZEPANSKI, S. 2014: Archeologia w sluzbie nazistöw - czyli rzecz o dzialalnosci „wydziahi wykopalisk“
SS-Ahnenerbe na stanowiskach w Starym Dzierzgoniu i Starym Miescie, Z dziejôw badan archéologie-
znych na Pomorzu Wschodnim, 221-244. Gdansk.
SZOMBATHY, J. 1882: Über die Ausgrabungen in den Mährischen Höhlen im Jahre 1881, Sitzungsberichte
der k.k. Akad der Wiss. I. Abth. Febr. Heft, LXXXV Band, 90-107.
SZOMBATHY, J. 1903: Der diluviale Mensch in Europa, Globus 84, 319-374.
SZOMBATHY, J. 1925: Die diluvialen Menschenreste aus der „Fürst-Johanns“ - Höhle bei Lautsch in Mähren,
Die Eiszeit 2,1-34,73-95.
SAMALIK, J. 1937: Krâpnikové jeskynë ostrovské v Moravském Krasu. Vlastnim nâkladem. Brno.
SEBELA, L. 1998: Frantisek Matëjka, Pravëk NR 8,410-411.
SEFClK, E. 1984: Pfehled vyvoje opavskyeh muzei v letch 1814-1938, Casopis Slezského muzea,, series B 33,
1-44.
SEFCIK, E. 1989: Osobnosti opavskyeh muzei do druhé svëtové vâlky, Casopis Slezského muzeay series B 38,
164-187.
SlL, J. 2002: Osobnost Frantiska Adâmka (16.10.1907-8.11.1989), Pravëk NR 12,444-448.
SIMEK, Em. 1935: Problémy moravské prehistoric, Casopis matice moravské 59,1-66.
SIMEK, Em. 1948: Furor teutonicus v Mikulovë. Ke zkâze moravskych diluviâlnich pamâtek, Z dâvnych vëkü
1/1947-48,153-164.
SIMEK, Em. 1949: Sto let ceské archéologie na prazské univerzitë, Z dâvnych vëkù II, 169-171.
SIMEK, Em. 1930/53: Velkâ Germania Klaudia Ptolemaia I. Praha 1930. IL Brno 1935. III. Brno 1949. IV.
Brno 1953.
259
CESTY MORAVSKÉ PALEOLITICKÉ ARCHEOLOGIE V OBDOBÍ CESKOSLOVENSKÉ REPUBLIKY
SKVARILOVÁ, B. 2003: The Hrdlicka Museum of Man. In: Integrální antropologie - perspektiva dneska: Me-
morial prof. J. Matiegky, 14-19. Praha.
STEFANOVICOVÁ, T. 1989: Zivot a dielo Jana Eisnera, Zbornik Filozofickejfakulty Univerzity Komenského,
Histórica, rocník XXXIX-XL, 101-109.
STORCH, E. 1907: Clovek diluviální. Praha.
STORCH, E. 1909: Prvni lidé V Cechách. Praha.
STORCH, E. 1910: Praha v dobë kamenné. Praha.
STORCH, E. 1916: Praha v dobê pfedhistorické. Praha
TEYROVSKŸ, V. 1961: Ze vzpominek na prof. Dr. Karla Absolona, Sbornik Klubu pfirodovêdeckého v Brnè
XXXIII, 125-129.
TOMÁSKOVÁ, S. 1995: A site in history: archaeology at Dolni Vëstonice/Unterwisternitz, Antiquity 69,
301-316.
TOMÁSKOVÁ, S. 2003: Nationalism, Local Histories and the Making of Data in Archaeology, Journal of the
Royal Anthropological Institute, Vol. 9-3,485-507.
TRAMPLER, R. 1903: Die ältesten Grabuntgen im Brünner Höhlengebiete, Mitteilungen der prähistorischen
Kommission derk. k. Akademie der Wissenschaften in Wien 1,3,119-128.
TRAVËNEC, V. 1904: Nálezy od Lulce, Pravèk 2,21-24.
TRIGGER, G. B. 1980: Gordon Childe. Revolutions in Archaeology. London.
TRIGGER, G. B. 1989: A History of Archaeological Thought. Cambridge.
TRIGGER, G. B. 2006: A History of Archaeological Thought. Second Edition. Cambridge.
TUREK, R. 1966: Josef Skutil, Archeologické rozhledy 18-1,74-75.
TYLOR, E. B. 1897: Úvod do studia clovëka a civilisace. Praha.
URBAN, H. 0.1997: Er war der Mann zwischen den Fronten, Oswald Menghin und das Urgeschichtliche
Institut der Universität Sien während der Nazizeit, Archeologia Austriaca 80,1996 (1997), 1-24.
URBAN, H. O. 2004: Das Urgeschichtliche Institut der Universität Sien während der Nazizeit. In: B. Ge-
diga - W. Piotrowski eds.: Archeologia, kultura, idéologie, Práce Komisji Archeologicznej PAN Nr. 15 -
Biskupiñskie Práce Archeologiczne Nr. 3, 73-82. Biskupin-Wroclaw.
VACEK, J. 1923: Dr. O. Menghin: Urgeschichte Niederösterreichs, Viden 1922, Památky archeologické 33,
358-359.
VALOCH, K. 1960: Magdalénien na Moravë. Brno.
VALOCH, K. 1965: Prof. Dr. Josef Skutil, Acta Musei Moraviae, Sei. soc. L, 336-337.
VALOCH, K. 1993: Prof. K. Absolon a jeho schopnost integrace vëdnich oborü, Sbornik pfispëvkù z konfe-
rence MU- Brnénská véda a uméní meziválecného období (1918-1939) v evropském kontextu, 210-212.
Brno.
VALOCH, K. 1999a: Epizody paleolitického osídlení jeskynë Pekárny, Acta Musei Moraviae, Sei. soc. LXXXIV,
9-26.
VALOCH, K. 1999b: Emanuel Dania (31.1.1901-9.2.1974), Pravék NR 9,467-468.
VALOCH, K. 2001a: Das Magdalénien in Mähren. 130 Jahre Forschung, Jahrbuch RGZM 48,103-159.
VALOCH, K. 2001b: Wanklüv paleoliticky nález ze Sloupskych jeskyni, Acta Musei Moraviae, Sei. soc. 86,
27-33.
VALOCH, K. 2008: Poznámky k problematickÿm umëleckÿm predmëtûm z Dolnich Vëstonic, Acta Musei
Moraviae, Sei. soc. XCIII, 99-114.
VALOCH, K. 2012: K historii clenëni würmského/viselského glaciálu v ceskych zemích, Archeologické roz-
hledy LXIV 129-135.
VALOCH A KOL. 2011: Kúlna - Historie a vÿznam jeskynë, Acta Speleologica 2/2011. Pruhonice.
VALOCH, K. - LÁZNICKOVÁ-GALETOVÁ, M. (eds.) 2009: Nejstarsí uméní strední Evropy. První meziná-
rodní vystava originálú paleolitického uméní. Brno.
VALOUSEK, B. 1928: Novy nález kulturní vrstvy paleolitické u Pouzdran, Pfíroda 21,103-104.
VASÍCEK, Z. 1996: Obrazy minulosti. Praha.
VASÍCEK, Z. 2006: Archéologie, historie, minulost. Praha.
260
CESTY MORAVSKÉ PALEOLITICKÉ ARCHEOLOGIE V OBDOBÍ CESKOSLOVENSKÉ REPUBLIKY
VASÍCEK, Z. 2007: Z pravëku prehistorie. Obrázky z dëjin archéologie, Archeologické rozhledy 59,
747-761.
VEIT, U. 2000: Gustaf Kosina and his koncept of national archeology. In: H. Härke ed.: Archeology; Ideology
and Society: The German Experience, 40-64. Frankfurt am Main.
VENCL, SI. 2002: Lothar Zotz: o nëm i o nás, Archeologické rozhledy 54,837-850.
VENCL, SI. 2006: Nejstarsi osidleni fiznich Cech. Praha.
VESELÁ, Bl. 2005:150 let od narozeni Jana Smycky (1855-1927), Pravèk NR 15/2005,468-472.
VIGNATIOVÁ, J. 1968: Vÿvoj archeologickÿch map v ceskych zemich do pfelomu 19. a 20. stoleti, Sbornik
pracíFilozofickéfakulty brnènské univerzity, rada archeologická M 5,189-200.
VIGNATIOVÁ, J. 1975: Pfehled vyvoje archeologického bádání na Moravë do zacátku XX. století. Zprâvy
Ceskoslovenské spolecnosti archeologické, rocník XVII, sesit 3, 93-128.
VILDOMEC, F. 1923: Jaroslav Palliardi. Posmrtnà vzpominka, Casopis Vlastivëdného musea v Olomouci 34,
1-5.
VILDOMEC, F. 1931: Soupis praehistorickÿch nâlezû ze Znojemska, Od Horacka k Podyji 8,3-11.
VILDOMEC, F. 2001: O notâfi Jaroslavu Palliardim. In: VI. Podborskÿ ed.: 50 let archeologickÿch vyzkumù
Masarykovy univerzity na Znojemsku, 106-113. Brno.
VIRCHOW, H. 1924: Der Unterkiefer von Ochos, Zeitschrift für Ethnologie 56,197-204.
VLADÁR, J (ed.): 1987: Stefan Jansâk : Kstorocnici nestora slovenskej archéologie. Nitra.
VLADÁR, J. 2006: Ing. Dr. h. c. Stefan Jansák a slovenská muzeológia, Studia histórica Nitriensia 13,
228-237.
VLCEK, Em. 1951: Zivotní dílo J. F. Babora, Anthropozoikum 1,231-233.
VOLÁKOVÁ, S. 2005: Stípaná industrie z jeskynë Pekárny (Mokrá) v Moravském krasu, Acta Musei Mora-
viae, Sel soc. XC, 129-160.
VYBÍRAL, B. 1927: Dr. M. Remes sedesátníkem, Casopis Vlastivëdného spolku musejniho v Olomouci, 39,
1-9.
WAHLE, E. 1941: Zur ethnischen eutungfrühgeschichtlicher Kulturprovinzen: Grenzen der frühgeschichtlichen
Erkenntnis. Heidelberg.
WAHLE, E. 1950: Studien zur Geschichte der prähistorischen Forschung. Heidelberg.
WANKEL, H. 1868: Der mensch der postplioeänen Periode nd die Pariser Ausstellung, Lotos XVIII, 18-23,
37-46.
WANKEL, H. (J.). 1870: Der Menschenknochenfund in der Bycí Skäla-Höhle, Mitteilungen der anthropolo-
gischen Gesellschaft in Wien 1, Nr. 4,101-105.
WANKEL, H. 1871 : Prähistorische Alterthümer in den mährischen Höhlen, Mitteilungen der anthropologis-
chen Gesellschaft in Wien 1, Nr. 11,266-281, 309-314,329-343.
WEIGNER, K. (ed.) 1935: VÉgalité des races européennes. Paris-Bruxelles.
WILHEIM, P. - SKUTIL, J. 1931-1932: Praehistorické nálezy na Ríckách u Domásova (Okr. Ivancice) na
Moravë, Acta Musei Moraviae 29,1-10.
WILLEY, R. G. - SABLOFF, A. J. 1980: A History of American Archeology (Second Edition). London.
WOLDRICH, J. N. 1880: Diluviální clovëk ve stíední Evropë, Památky archeologické 11,385-388.
WOLDRICH, J. N. 1894: Beiträge zur Urgeschichte Böhmens II, Mitteilungen der Anthropologischen Gesel-
lschaftin Wien 14,200-220.
WOLDRICH, J. N. 1896: Pfehled tíídéní antropozoické skupiny útvarní v stíední Evropë se zrete-
lem na kulturní stupnë clovëka, Véstník Král Ceské spolecnosti nauk, tr. mat.-prír., 1896, c. XI,
17-25.
WOLDRICH, J. N. 1897a: O prechodních dobách predhistorickych, Casopis Spolecnosti pfátel starozitností
ceskych v Praze 5,1-7,41-46.
WOLDRICH, J. N. 1897b: Pfehled fauny obratlovcù z „ceského masivu“ za éry Antropozoické, Véstník Král.
Ceské spolecnosti nauk, tf. mat.-pfír., 1897, c. 25,393-428.
WOLDRICH - STEJSKAL, J. 1934: Geologickÿ profil hlinistëm a svázení v cihelnë u Dolnich Vëstonic na
Moravë, Veda Pfírodní 15,129-137.
261
CESTY M0RAVSKE PALEOLITICKfi ARCHEOLOG1E V OBDOBl CESKOSLOVHNSKE REPUBLIKY
WOZNY, M. 2004: Wptyw idei marksistowskich i chrzescijahskich na stuida nad wierzeniami. In: B. Ge-
diga - W. Piotrowski eds.: Archeologia, kultura, Ideologie, Präce Komisji Archeologicznej PAN Nr. 15 - Bis-
kupihskie Präce Archeologiczne Nr. 3, 319-330. Biskupin-Wroclaw.
WOZNY, M. 2009: Wlodzimierz Demetrykiewicz (1859 - 1937): the first prehistorian from Cracow. On his
150th birthday anniversary, Archeologia Polona 47/2009,33-58.
WOZNY, M. 2010: Wlodzimierz Demetrykiewicz (1859-1937) - pierwszy prehistoryk z Krakowa, Materialy
archeologiczne XXXVIII, 175-192.
ZAJICEK, P., 2009: Sto let od objevu Punkevnich jeskyni. http://www.national-geographic.cz/archeologie-
a-historie/sto-let-od-objevu-punkevnich-jeskyni-3796/
ZAPLETAL, K. 1929-30: Geologie pfedmosteckeho diluvia a okoli prerovskeho, Acta Musei Moraviae
26-27,410-435.
ZAPLETAL, K. 1942-45: Mineralogicke slozeni kamennych nastrojü vestonickych, Studie z oboru vseobecne
krasove nauky C7,219-221.
ZELNITIUS, A. 1933: Strucny prehled archeologie a archeologickeho vyzkumu v okresu uhersko-hradist-
skem, Sbornik Velehradsky 4,12-18.
ZELNITIUS, A. 1938: Nälezy palaeolithu na Velehrade, Sbornik Velehradsky 9,16-17.
ZOTZ, L. 1942: Der erste altsteinzeitliche Hausgrundriss in Mitteleuropa, Ouartär 4,193-197.
ZOTZ, L. 1944: Von den Mammutjägern zu den Wikingen. Leipzig.
ZOTZ, L. - VLK, W. 1939: Das paläolithikum des unteren Waagtales, Quartär II, 65-101. Berlin.
ZELiZKO, J. V. 1923: Praveky clovek z jeskyni od Mladce u Litovle, Priroda 16,14-17.
ZLÄBEK, K. 1960: Vzpominka na PhDr. Karla Absolona, Zpravodaj Antropologicke spol. XIII2/3,1-2.
262
CESTY MORAVSKE PALEOLITICKfi ARCHEOLOGIE V OBDOBt CESKOSLOVENSKE REPUBLIKY
SUMMARY
The Path of Moravian Palaeolithic Archaeology at the Time
of the Czechoslovak Republic 1918-1938
Interest in the history of fields of the humanities or natural sciences differ significantly in their intensity
in various countries. In part, this is because of the different traditions of scientific research, partially thanks
to a number of complex causes, reflecting the often conscious or unconscious stereotypes contained in scien-
tific knowledge. This also true in the case of archaeology, the history of which always arouses on the one
hand significant general attention (chiefly due to research on Antique monuments) and on the other hand
by a number of experts was often overlooked as unnecessary and unduly burdensome.
It is a generally known fact that deep and systematic attention to the history of archaeology is paid in
Anglo-Saxon countries (here in the past the works by mainly G. Daniel or J. Evans were considered, currently
chiefly B. G. Trigger). In the scientific tradition of German-speaking countries particularly German itself
stands out in this area (H. Gummel, E. Wahle, G. Kossack aj.), with a special regard of the study of the role
of archaeology in connection with nationalistic and nazistic movements. The tradition of research of the his-
tory of archaeology with Central Europe (or its post-communistic parts) on the contrary is not very deep
and the extensive Polish archaeological community has a more distinctive reflection than the Czech one.
Still at the beginning of the 1980s, Bruce Trigger and Ian Glover in the preparation of the double edition of
World Archaeology (vol 13/1981, No. 2 and vol 14/1982, No. 2), devoted to the history of archaeology and
regional traditions in global archaeological research, did not have Central Europe included at all. From this
perspective, a “black hole” yawned between the countries of Western Europe and the Soviet Union (in Russia
today the production of literature with the themes of the history of archaeology are also quickly growing).
The seeming nonexistence of historical reflection of the archaeological research in the Czech lands in this
case was not given only by the disregard of English-written texts, but predominantly by the lack of solid bases
in the area of the history of archaeology generally. Also Karel Sklenar spoke in the same spirit in the only
synthesis of Czech and Central European history of archaeology intended for the English-speaking reader
and at the same time indisputably one of the most quoted books by a Czech archaeologist 0Archeology in
Central Europe: the First 500 Years” from 1983. Sklenar defines this space as “terra incognita” with the study
of the history of archaeology in comparison with the situation for instance in France or England (Sklenar
1983b, 4).
In the Czech lands, whose archaeological tradition is very rich, views into the past of the field were in-
itially only random and singular interest. The first Czech overview was presented by L. Niederle (1893) and
J. Smolik (1898), then more extensively by A. Stocky in the Preface to his “Praveku” (Prehistory, 1926). For
the territory of Moravia, such a first work is particularly the introductory passage of the synthesis by
I. L. Cervinka. As one of the main topics of his research, Josef Skutil set out the interest in the history of
archaeology already in the interwar period, who thanks to his unprecedented heuristic work accumulated
and published a great amount of smaller articles and attempts at individual thematic summary chapters from
the history of archaeology. For the history of Czech archaeology, the works by Karel Sklenar are essential,
who began to devote himself to this topic from the 1960s. Since that time, he has published a number of mo-
nographs, bibliographic lists and individual studies. Thanks to this author, the field of the history of archaeo-
logy has also at least partially institutionalized in the system of sciences of the Czech Republic (in the
mid-1970s, it did so also on the international level within efforts to include the history of the field in the pro-
gramme of the congresses of the UISPP). Jana Vignatiova set out in a similar direction in Moravia in the
1970s. The singular works include also the historiosophic oriented texts by Zdenek Vasicek (1996; 2006;
2007) and a synthesis devoted to the history of archaeology from its beginnings published along with Jaroslav
263
CESTY MORAVSKfi PALEOLITICKfi ARCHEOLOGIE V OBDOBl £ESK0SL0VENSK£ REPUBLIKY
Malina in 1980 as the two-volume “Archeologie vcera a dries” (Archaeology Yesterday and Today), soon for-
cibly recalled from the book market. This work just like its post-revolution English version represents rather
a global view in the style of the work by B. Trigger, than a look into the regional history of archaeology;
Malina 1980; Malina - Vasicek 1990).
Certainly under the influence of the changes of the cultural-political paradigms after 1989 and also
thanks to the needs to seek new topics with the incoming and numerically uncommonly growing new gene-
ration of professinoal archaeologists at the turn of the 21st century, we see an increase in the interest in the
history of the field also in Czech archaeology. Vladimir Podborsky has dealt with Moravian themes in the
present for a long time. The necessary historical distance also allows reflection on the problematic relations
of political ideologies and archaeology, which in archaeology here start to appear mainly in relation to the
period of WWII. The influence of Marxist-Leninist philosophy and ideology on the shaping of our field here
remains for the moment largely untouched, again unlike the situation for instance in Polish or German
archaeology.
Also this book endeavours to expand the new knowledge from the history of Czech archaeology. The
main theme is limited to the history of the field after the foundation of the Czechoslovak Republic in 1918
until its end on the threshold of WWII in 1938. The territory which the books deals with in the delimited
historical boundaries of the land of Moravia, which covers the eastern third of the Czech Republic. At the
same time, this territory is among the wealthiest for Palaeolithic monuments in the European-wide context.
Palaeolithic research in Moravia is a very significant chapter in the history of Czech archaeology, which had
a leading role in the cultural politics of the Czechoslovak Republic and the international scientific field. Few
areas from the earliest human history has evoked so many current questions and attention as the research of
the Palaeolithic period in hopeful period of the twenty-year existence of the young Czechoslovak Republic
in the interwar period. Besides accumulating and publishing for the first time the material from rich archival
collections, the text tries to fins answers to the question that archaeology represented in various periods and
various places for different groups of people, who perceived it from both professional positios and from the
perspective of enthusiastic interested parties and spectators who identified with the results of archaeological
science in some way.
The time limitation of the work and its theme come also from the context of the current state of the
knowledge of the history of archaeology in the Czech lands and from the amount and accessibility of key
archival documents. The delimitation of a study primarily on the period of the existence of the inter war Cze-
choslovak Republic is given by the fact that almost all of Czech literature dealing with the history of archaeo-
logy has so far been concentrated on the period before 1918. The upper time limit was set by the beginning
of WWII, after it ends there is an entirely new situation in the organization of archaeology and fundamental
changes come in archaeological theory and the whole cultural and political context.
The interwar period in Czecholsovakia generally had a relatively bemelo obecne pomerne priznivy vliv
for the development of prehistory. Archaeology was gradually professionalized; a new legal and institutional
foundation was put in place. It took place chiefly within the Institute of Archaeologgy of the Academy of
Sciences with state-wide activities, which was founded in 1919 and teaching at the new Czechoslovak uni-
versities in Prague, Brno and Bratislava. Also the considerably sympathetic relationship of President of the
Republic T. G. Masaryk to this science, which he often not only symbolically, but also significantly materially
supported, certainly had a positive influence on the development of archaeological institutions. This favou-
rable atmosphere was projected not on the creation of new university workplaces with new graduate and as-
sociate professor programmes in archeology, but also in the implementation of significant medieval and
prehistoric field research projects (Prague Castle, Dolni Vestonice, the cave Domica, eneolithic settlement
of Homolka - here with the participation of Harvard University, oppidum Stare Hradisko, burial grounds
from the Roman period in Trebusice, A Roman camp near Musov, a Slavonic fortified steelement at Budec,
a Slavonic burial ground in Devinska Nova Ves etc). Fundamental synthetic works on prehistory and early
medieval Bohemia, Moravia and Silesia or on the individual prehistoric cultures were also written and pu-
blished. This epoch also includes key synthetic works, which were issued soon after WWII and which pre-
sented the results of the research of the interwar period forcibly interrupted by the events of 1939-1945 and
264
CESTY MORAVSKE PALEOLITICKfi ARCHEOLOGIE V OBDOBi £ESK0SL0VENSK£ REPUBLIKY
which became the basis for the study of the further postwar development (Stockf 1926; Cervinka 1927; 1928;
Schrdnil 1928; Skutil 1938-39; Eisner 1933; Simek 1930/1953; Böhm 1937a; 1941; Filip 1937; 1941; 1948; Bor-
kovsky 1940; Neustupny, J. 1946 ad.).
The fundamental synopsis of the available literature from the area of the history of Czech archaeology
was prepared by Karel Sklendr (2011b, 9-14). At this point, it is possible to present only a few of the important
works that directly concern the territory of Moravia. Moravian researchers devoted themselves to the first
overviews of the history of the research, focused most on chronological lists of the successful discoveries and
publications already at the beginning of the 20th century. The first such attempts were brought by I. L. Cer-
vinka in the introductory chapters of his synthetic works (Cervinka 1902,1927) and also independently (Cer-
vinka 1903). Another of these pioneering works before WW1 came from the research from Brno Frantisek
Cerny (1907). In the interwar period, a key figure for learning about the history of the field was Josef Skutil,
who not only amassed an enormous amount of small materials (the list of his bibliography by his son Skutil
1969), presented a list of the bibliography devoted to the Moravian Pleistocene from 1850-1950 (Skutil 1965),
but he also treated the first history of the paleontological and archaeological interest in the Pleistocene from
the 16th century to the present in two syntheses dealing with the Palaeolithic settlement of the Czech lands
(.Skutil 1938; 1938-1939) and dis also during the war in the journal Alböhmen und Altmähren (Skutil 1941).
Jan Knies also dealt exclusively with the history of the research of the Palaeolithic period in Moravia in an
independent subjectively conceived manuscript from 1927 (Kostrhun 2008b, 100-119, the transcript is
published here as Appendix 1). Generally, we find the outline of the history of archaeology also in a number
of already mentioned important First Republic archaeological syntheses and some partial works (Skutil 1939;
Stocky 1924a; 1926,1-12). Naturally, also in some works that were not devoted to the Moravian issue or pri-
marily the history of archaeology (Böhm 1937b; 1936-1937; 1953; 1954). Professor of Prague’s German uni-
versity Leonhard Franz (1937) turned to the history of German archaeology in Czechoslovakia, what is
important for the history of the research of the Moravian Palaeolithic is a valuable treatment of the early
excavations in the caves of the Moravian Karst by the Viennese secondary-school teacher Richard Trampler
(1903).
The most important for learning about the history of Moravian archaeology is, however, the literary
production after WWII. These include the key collected Czech works on the history of archaeology (Sklendr
1969; 1976; 1983c; Vignatiovd 1968) and also some texts concerning only the territory of Moravia (Vignatiovd
1975). Also these mentioned syntheses, however, developed the theme of the history of archaeology mainly
to the period before WWI. The interwar period was dealt with only sporadically in individual texts (Krump-
hanzlovä ed. 1972; 1975; Sklendr 1983b; Motykovd 2002). The key treatment for the description of the deve-
lopment and significance of archaeological institutions or the development of care for archaeological
monuments and constitution of the legal framework for the area of the Czech lands until 1989 is by K. Sklenaf,
published also synthetically (Sklendr 2011c). The theme was treated synoptically for Moravia by V. Podborsky
(1994b).
Researchers, other than briefer passages of general works, devoted more attention to the development
of archaeology in Moravia after WWI on the occasion of the recapitalization of various regional research
traditions (for the territory of Moravia, for instance Filer 1979; Jisl 1964; Kohoutek 1996; Kosturik 1986; Ko-
vdrnik 1995; 2001; 2008; Mechurovd 1996; Snasil 1971). It was done similarly in the evaluation of the history
and foundation of important museum institutions and collections (Nekuda 1969; Kostrhun 2003; Humpo-
lova - Podborsky 2013 etc.). In some cases, increased attention was paid to the research of the most important
archaeological localities - from the Palaeolithic period chiefly Dolni Vestonice, Predmosti near Prerov, Mla-
dec and the Moravian caves (e.g. Eickhof2009; Musil 2010; Oliva 2003c; Skutil 1951; Svoboda 1994; 2000; To-
mdskova 1995; Valoch 1960; 2001a; 2001b; Valoch et al 2011). The history of the field is naturally contributed
to by all of the biographic works dedicated to individual personalities of our research. The extensive literature
(necrologies, profiles etc.) on individual researchers are always mentioned in the appropriate chaptrs of the
presented work. At this point, however, besides the classical encyclopaedic work by Jan Filip (1966-1969),
we mention the very beneficial { Biograficky slovnik ceskych, moravskych a slezskych archeologu5 [Biographic
Dictionary of Czech, Moravian and Silesian Archaeologists] by Karel Sklenaf (2005), or for Moravian
265
CESTY MORAVSKE PALEOLITICKE ARCHEOLOGIE V OBDOBl CESKOSLOVENSKE REPUBLIKY
archaeology the ever growing “Kalendarium moravske a slezske archeologie” [Calendar of Moravian and Si-
lesian Archaeology], which has been coming out as a part of the journal Pravek [Prehistory] regularly since
1991 and the connected series of monographs “Postavy moravske archeologie” [Figures of Moravian Archaeo-
logy]. Other very valuable guides include the biographic overviews of our archaeology by individual archaeo-
logical periodicals, issued mainly thanks to the editors of “Zprav ceske archeologicke spolecnosti” (Report of
the Czech Archaeological Society; on Moravian journals: Oliva 2001a; Prochazkova 2002; Sklenar 2000 and
other devoted to individual German and Czech periodicals).
The current production, which would follow the development of Moravian interwar archaeology, hence
is not very rich in comparison with other countries. The relative „disinterest“ in a systematic treatment of
the history of archaeology after WWI is surprising, if we consider that precisely in this period the rapid de-
velopment of modern prehistory took place, which is connected with “heroic” archaeological discoveries all
over the world. It has even led some authors to label the first quarter of the 20th century as the period of the
“great revolution in prehistory” (Daniel 1962, 69-87). At the same time, it is a period in which positivism
peaked, but also nationalistic connotations in archaeology, which distinctly influenced society-wide processes.
This period also sought professional starting points from the insufficient possibilities of relative chronology
and from the limitations or impossibility to absolutely date archaeological finds and cultures before the “ra-
diocarbon revolution” in the 1950s (cf. Renfrew 1973, 21-52). Also these aspects are instructive from the
perspective of the history of the methodology of the science. The mentiond “disinterest” is on the contrary
explicable by the need for a certain historical distance and naturally also a social demand for similar topics
from the history of science, which has been rising recently. In any case, the period of the development of ar-
chaeology in interwar Czechoslovakia, precisely thanks to the relatively short but very dynamic epoch of the
transformation of the “amateurish” scientific field into a fully professionalized and institutionalized scientific
discipline in the new state, is very important and stimulating for research for the learning of the sense and
direction of Czech archaeology.
To devote attention within the study of the history of interwar archaeology in Czechoslovakia mainly
to Palaeolithic research was important also for other reasons. In the context of the creation and development
of archaeological science in Moravia, we naturally do not find elsewhere known and distinctive immense
prehistoric monuments, which were at the beginning of archaeology as a new scientific discipline with the
first researchers focusing attention in the distant history of their nations whether in Europe or on other con-
tinents, but we can state that to a certain extent precisely the Palaeolithic archaeological localities took on
the role of these prehistoric symbols in Moravia. Already in the 16th century, there were finds of fossilized
mammoth bones in Predmosti near Pferov or Moravian caves. In the 19th century, there were excavations
of the first identified traces of Palaeolithic peoples and further quickly amassing evidence from the period
of the “Diluvium” in the second half of the 19th century. The deep research tradition in this areas, which
achieved international acclaim, then strongly influenced also the archaeology in the interwar period. It was
not an accident that Karel Absolon began to call the newly discovered Dolni Vestonice (1924) the Diluvial
Poinpei and compare the finds from there with the fame of the discovery of Tutankhamuns tomb in Egypt.
For many, Palaeolithic research in Moravia at that time was one of the main identifying markers of
archaeology as a whole. Also for the newly founded republic, Moravian Palaeolithic research was an important
part of Czechoslovak cultural policy towards the international public. It was manifest e.g. in 1928, when the
Czechoslovak Republic recapitulated the 10 years of its successful existence. A new functionalist exhibition
grounds was built in Brno on this occasion, where an independent pavilion “Man and His Lineage” with the
archaeological finds of Karel Absolon from Moravian excavations was not lacking. This exhibition laid the
base for the specialized museum and scientific institute founded later Anthropos of the Moravian Museum.
The Moravian excavations then played the opposite role in the period of WWII, when Dolni Vestonice were
included in the Nazi research programme SS-Ahnenerbe, which were to confirm the existence of Nordic
races on the territory of Central Europe already at the beginning of the settlement of European by Man. Pa-
laeolithic archaeology hence plays an important role within the history of the knowledge of the field itself,
in the context of local history (in some case alive to this day), but also in the cultural-political history of our
state in general. From this perspective, the following of the history of the Palaeolithic research in Moravia
266
CESTY MORAVSKE PALEOLITICKE ARCHEOLOGIE V OBDOBl CESKOSLOVENSKfi REPUBLIKY
offers a number of interpretational areas and allows insight into the role of archaeology not only in the trans-
forming system of the sciences but in all of society.
Another no less important reason to follow the theme as defined is the great wealth of unpublished
archival documents. For the interwar period, the most valuable sources include Absolon’s archive deposited
in the Moravian Museum (11,000 photographs, more than 13,000 letters, a number of as-yet unarranged
archival materials), the archive from the legacy of Jan Knies deposited there, but naturally also a whole series
of as-yet only partially utilized materials from various local collections, chiefly protected in museums but
also in private hands. Another very valuable source of information is the study of period media, thus mainly
newspapers, inw chih the perception and importance of archaeological discoveries outside the field of
archaeology are mirrored. The accessibility and relative unexplored nature of the mentioned collections is
still a great challenge for the research of the history of Palaeolithic archaeology.
The actual aims and methodology of the work does not deviate in any way from the contemporary his-
torical methods for the study of the history of the humanities. The text relies on the factual treatment and
description of the development of the science in the given period, analysis of the period thought, observation
of the development of the breadth and depth of the factual knowledge of archaeology, observation of the re-
search techniques of the field work and method of the treatment of the find material and observation of the
development of the historical and archaeological interpretation (paradigms). The outlined questions are fol-
lowed in the European-wide context, which in essence allow a quantitative but also primarily a qualitative as-
sessment of Moravian Palaeolithic archaeology. The methodology of the work arose from observing the state
of the study of the issue in domestic and foreign literature, excerption from period archaeological literature,
journals and reviews and last but not least from studies of the mentioned unpublished archival materials.
In order to better understand the context of the development of interwar Palaeolithic archaeology in
Czechoslovakia, the advancement of archaeology in the first 40 years of the 20th century within all of Europe
is depicted here in the work in a thumbnail sketch, because with the gradual growth of knowledge there was
a much more distinctive influencing and connecting of the ideas and opinions on the history of prehistory.
Four our case, the fundamental work on this theme currently is the monograph by Canadian archaeologist
Bruce G. Tigger “A History of Archaeological Thought”, chiefly then the supplemented second edition of 2006
(Trigger 1989; 2006,567-576). Triggers work is not, however, unique. From the circle of Anglo-Saxono lite-
rature, it is necessary to mention at least for the 20th century the very popular and readable synthesis by Bri-
tish researcher Glyn Daniel, on which this work also relies (Daniel 1962; 1976). Inspiring texts also came
from the anthology of selected and earlier studies cHistorie$ of Archaeology: A Reader in the History of Ar-
chaeology” from the editors Tim Murray and Christopher Evans (2008). For quick insight into transatlantic
archaeology, A History of American Archeology (Willey - Sabloff 1980) was used. In order to understand the
advancement of European archaeology, some accessible comprehensive monographs devoted to selected na-
tional archaeologies are important: for the cradle of archaeology in Scandinavia e.g. Klind - Jensen (1975);
for the states neighbouring the Czech Republic in the case of Germany in generalctStudien zur Geschichte
der prahistrorischen Forschung (Wahle 1950), a number of studies devoted to the period of Nazism from its
beginnings (e.g. Harke 2000; Leube-Hegewisch 2002) and generally a very rich tradition of the study of the
history of German archaeology (cf. Sklenaf 201 lb, 21 - 30). For a just as developed history of the research
in Poland, it is necessary to mention at least the fundamental work by /. lech (1998), A. Abramowicz (1991;
1992) or already the postwar synthesis by J. Kostrzewski (1949). Compared to that, the literary production
in Austria and Slovakia is much poorer and more fragmentary on our theme. A brief synopsis of the research
of the Austrian Palaeolithic period was published by Neugebauer-Maresch (2008). For the history of Slovak
archaeology, the monographic treatment of individual historical figures and archaeologists are important (to
the foundation of the Czechoslovak Socialist Republic) by B. Polla (1996) and for theme a number of works
by J. Skutila are then important. In order to observe the advancement of Palaeolithic research in Europe,
a comparison is also important with the history of archaeology in North Africa, where the majority of im-
portant European Palaeolithic archeologists worked (Robertshaw 1990).
The actual text is divided into several independent topics. After the introductory part with a definition
of the issue and outline of the knowledge on the history of interwar archaeology in Moravia and historical
267
CKSTY MORAVSKfi PALEOUTICKfi ARCHEOLOGIE V OBDOBl CESKOSlOVENSKfi REPUBLIKY
inclusion of archaeological knowledge in the Czech lands in the 20th century, a chapter follows devoted to
the knowledge of the Palaeolithic period at the turn of the 20th century. The basic Positivist starting points
of mainly French and German archaeology at that time (G. de Mortillet, E. Cartailhac, R. Virchow and others)
are characterized here. The period topics, institutions and figures of Moravian Palaeolithic archaeology
(J. Wankel, K.}. Maska, M. Kriz, F. Cerny, A. Makowsky, J. Szombathy, A. Rzehak) are then integrated into
this context. The main attention in the work is naturally devoted to interwar archaeology. The theme of the
development of European archaeological theory of the first four decades of the 20th century, the development
of the methodology of archaeological research and the context of the actual finds of the European Palaeolithic
era is contained in the fourth chapter of the book. Attention is paid to the theories of diffusionism, migra-
tionism, cultural historical archaeology and neoevolutionism (G. Kossinna, V. G. Childe aj.), functionalism
(J. G. Clarke), archaeology in the Soviet Union in the 1920s-30s and interwar archaeology in the USA. Spe-
cifically in European Palaeolithic archaeology figures that distinctly influences also Czech research, H. Breuil,
H. Obermaier, H. Begouen, 0. Menghin and others, then dominate.
Chapters focused directly on the issue of Moravian Palaeolithic archaeology, reflecting the Euopean ar-
chaeological theories of the first 4 decades of the 20th century in the works of Czech researchers build from
these more general topics. An outline of the institutional background and legal foundation of archaeology at
that time is also important for the advancement of Moravian archaeology. A substantial part of the text is
devoted to the figures of the main representatives of Moravian Palaeolithic archaeology. The generational
and institutional change after the revolutionary year of 1918 is represented chieflyby Jan Knies. The leading
and decisive personality of Palaeolithic research in all of Czechoslovakia was then clearly Karel Absolon.
Other researchers who significantly affected the knowledge of the Moravian Palaeolithic era include Josef
Skutil, Inocenc Ladislav Cervinka, Antonín Telicka, Alois Stehlik, Karel Zapletal, Hugo Sanka and a whole
series of others. A very important component of Moravian archaeology until 1945 naturally also included
German archaeologists living in Moravia, who mainly devoted their attention to Moravian Karst (Franz
Cupik, Hanz Mohr, Hanz Freising, Rudolf Czizek, Karl Juttner, Karl Schirmeisen). In order to understand
the level of advancement of Moravian Palaeolithic archaeology and the knowledge reached, it is necessary
to observe also at least in the essential outlines of the research in the neighbouring countries - in Poland (E.
Majewski, S. Krukowski, L. Kozlowski), Austria (J. Bayer, H. Obermaier, O. Menghin) and in the Slovak parts
of Czechoslovakia. The work also has two appendixes attached - a transcription of the manuscript by Jan
Knies “Dejiny vyzkumu moravskeho diluvia se soupisem literatury” [History of the Research on the Moravian
Diluvium with a List of the Literature], and a complete list of the correspondence received by Karel Absolon
in the archive of the Anthropos Institute of the Moravian Museum.
On the general level, it is clear that knowledge of the history of Czechoslovak archaeology in the histo-
rical period of the First Republic, hence from its foundation until the Munich Agreement in October 1938,
is markedly uneven at the moment. It is not otherwise even in this work, where the individual topics followed
could be developed in various intensities, dependent chiefly on the accessibility and number of archival ma-
terials.
One of the funsamental goals of the work was an attempt to outline the period archaeological thought
and predominant interpretive schemas and theories, which determined the direction of the advancement of
archaeological science and its influence on Czechoslovak archaeology in the interwar period. This was achie-
ved on more levels (the use of theoretical streams, period reviews, and personal correspondence). We can
state on the general level that Czech archaeology followed European theoretical trends in real time. In com-
parison with the surrounding countries, a clear distance can even be seen from ther period nationally tinged
theories coming from the cultural-historical school (Kossinna, Kostrzewski), we evaluate today as clearly
positive. Of the numerous reviews of foreign archaeological production, we can also detect a serious interest
in the results of the work of European researchers, developing the current ideas of the theories of diffusionism
and migrationism. When looking more closely, it is however necessary to state that this interest was brought
again mainly by a few leading figures particularly in the centre of the capital city of Prague (e.g. A. Stocky).
In the case of Moravia, we find a more complex development often slowed on the theoretical side and more
of a Positivist focus.
268
CESTY MORAVSKE PALEOLITICKE ARCHEOLOGIE V OBDOBi CESKOSLOVENSKE REPUBLIKY
The basic data used for the study of Palaeolithic archaeology in Moravia in the two decades between
1918 and 1938 worked from besides the excerpt of period archaeological literature, journals, reviews, the
daily newspapers, etc. From the treatment of several crucial archives, or the legacies of Moravian researchers.
One of the largest from this period indisputably is the archive of Karel Absolon, deposited in the Moravian
Museum. In 2007-2010, rich photodocumentation was made accessible for treatment, in which more that
7,800 photographs from Absolons research projects and study journeys were digitized (Moravian Karst, Di-
naric Karst, study journeys around Europe 1925-1938, Moravian Palaeolithic localities etc.; Kostrhun 2011;
Kostrhun - Moravec - Oliva 2010). In the same spirit, the treatment of Absolons received correspondence
numbering nearly 13,631 letters from 3054 authors was also begun (e.g. Kostrhun 2013; 2014; Oliva - Kostr-
hun). The collection of these letters is uncommonly rich for correspondence of both preeminent foreign re-
searchers and understandably also three geenrations of Czech, Moravian and Slovak researchers. Both
collections represent a first-class document for the study of the development of scientific disciplines at the
beginning of the 20th century and in the period of the First Czechoslovak Republic, hence at the beginning
of the development of interdisciplinary science of the humanities and natural sciences, whose representative
Karel Absolon indisputably was. Another of the very valuable archival collections is the legacy of Jan Knies
(nearly 2,500 manuscript pages and folios, more than 380 letters), deposited in the Anthropos Institute of
the Moravian Museum and partially in the hands of the living heirs (Kostrhun 2008,77-85,98-166). Of the
important archival acquisitions of the Moravian Museum, it is necessary to mention also the extensive legacy
of Josef Skutil, acquired in 2008 and deposited in the Institute of History of the Moravian Museum. This col-
lection contains a number of arranged materials on various topics from the history of domestic archaeology
including documents for individual researchers, on whom Josef Skutil focused. For the study of the history
of the research of the Palaeolithic era, a number of other archives preserved and used for work are then im-
portant (Regional Museum in Olomouc, Comenius Museum in Prerov, private collections etc.). At the same
time, it is likely that a number of other sources have not be used at all yet. Most of the image appendixes
used in the work also come from the mentioned collections (more than 300 photographs). On the other
hand, an enormous amount of documents in many cases remained only on the level of registration and a list
of the preserved sources, which could be used in the future for the study of further specific topics from the
area of the history of archaeology and related scientfic fields (see the list of the correspondence of Karel Ab-
solon - Appendix 2).
Considering the still strong role of individual figures forming archaeological research, it was not possible
to avoid a biographical history of specific researchers. Thanks to the social and political changes after 1918,
however, there was also a gradual institutionalization of archeology and its anchoring in the scientific and
academic institutions, compared to more fragmented “museum” “amateur” and “teaching” tradition of the
previous period. In this case, it was necessary also to follow the history of individual institutions, the emer-
gence of new collections and the policy of acquiring extensive collections of the elder generation of researchers
here badatelu. As compared to the milieu in Bohemia, the traditional structure of “amateur” archaeology
lasted longer in Moravia, both in research centres in the network of Moravian museums and also in the struc-
tures of the Moravian Archaeological Club and other associations, e.g. of German archaeologists. The first
professionalization of archaeology in Moravia does not come de facto until the 1930s, when Prof. Emanuel
Sirnek started to work at the university in Brno. Until then, the only truly university-educated archaeologist
in Moravia was Josef Skutil, if we do not include the in many ways original and specific leading personality
of Karel Absolon, who was university educated in other natural sciences.
A certain organizational delay of Moravian archaeology also in research of the Palaeolithic era led in
the 1930s chiefly to the creation and collection of a number of private collections, often containing very va-
luable sources of material culture. These wholes were variously treated and presented by individual resear-
chers, but chiefly on the level of Positivist registration and description. Endeavours for broader surveys,
which would interpret domestic finds in the wider European and “historiosophic” context were few. All fo-
cused in a few synthetic works, first by foreign authors (H. Breuil, H. Obermaier), then also by domestic au-
thors who, however, were significantly influences by the works of their foreign colleagues (J. Knies, I. L.
Cervinka). Also the most extensive sytheses of the Moravian Palaeolithic period by Josef Skutil published
269
CESTY MORAVSKÊ PALEOLITICKÊ ARCHEOLOGIE V OBDOBÎ ¿ESKOSI.OVENSKÉ REPUBUKY
before the outbreak of WWII remained on the level of the Positivist lists (albeit very carefully done and with
the use of the maximum of available sources). Actually, no synthetic work came from the workshop of the
icon of Moravian Palaeolithic research Karel Absolon, if we do not count the peculiar attempts for a concep-
tion of a Moravian Palaeolithic chronology published by Absolon at the end of WWII.
As against the 19th century, there was a tenfold increase in the number of known Palaeolithic sites in
Moravia in the 1920s and 1930s. These individual researchers appreciated them chiefly within their chrono-
logical and cultural classification. The traditional evolutionary “vertical” chronology of de Mortillet was used
for that. The wealth and unique nature of the Moravian finds, however, also aroused the attention of the lea-
ding European Palaeolithic scholars (Breuil, Obermaier, Burkitt etc.), who brought to the classification sche-
mes also the current “migrationist and diffusionist” ideas, connected with various supposed directions of
the spread of mankind, or the earliest settlement and human culture here. In Czech literature, these trends
appear most clearly in the discussion of the issue of the “Proto-Solutréen and Szeletian”, also in the polemics
on the earliest settlements in the Czech lands.
Although the methods of the absolute chronology of the Palaeolithic localities did not allow the creation
of a safe idea of the historical depth of the followed themes, a significant expansion of the chronological ho-
rizon took place at that time. Not until at the beginning of the 1920s was there gradually a recognition also
in Moravia of an earlier (pre-Aurignacian) Palaeolithic era, today generally called the Middle Palaeolithic
era. Despite the significant wealth of the find collections here and despite the grandly conceived and promoted
research by K. Absolon in Dolni Vëstonice and the cave Pekârna, Czech archaeology actually did not have
any geochronologically datable and coherent collections (most of the early collections were unverified stra-
tigraphically or came from surface collections). Later, the opinion dominated on the significant delay of the
settlement of Bohemia and Moravia, which was almost dogmatically codified by Absolons opinions, or re-
cognizing only vaguely defiend waves of settlement before the dominating generally conceived Aurignacian
culture (pre-Aurignacian). On the other hand, through the timelines the question of settlement in the Me-
zolithic era was actively resolved, which has so far not been definitively completed.
The obvious insuffiencies of the Moravian Palaeolithic research was resolved by the researchers in re-
sorting to following the French classification and chronological system. Another consequence of this situation
were attempts to define the autonomous unstable and local cultural archaeological wholes. The French moders
were in the first place also for the main representative of Palaeolithic archaeology at that time - Karel Absolon,
who allowed himself to be influenced significantly also in the organization of his scientific work, leading gra-
dually to the popularization of the “worldliness” of our excavations at the expense of his own research. Perhaps
precisely for this reason that despite the undeniable action radius of Absolon, there was not a closer connected
with the developing Palaeolithic archaeology in neighbouring Poland. The local researchers there besides
the same trend of inspiration in French archaeology (L. Kozlowski) developed also very remarkable ideas
which otherwise did not begin to dominate in European archaeology until the 1960s (the dynamically con-
ceived analysis of chipped stone assemblies by S. Krukowski). It is a question what role in this direction could
have been played by the different economic possibilities of Polish archaeologists, the personalities of the in-
dividual researchers or the generally tense political relations of Czechoslovakia with the Second Polish Re-
public.
Absolons established direction did not lead even to a more modern conception of the methods of his
own archaeological research projects, which already from the 1930s at the latest in European archaeology
allowed the resolution of spatial relations within settlements and did not follow only the aim of extracting
the actual material culture from the excavations. It should be added that the model with French researchers
was sought also by the generation older Jan Knies, who actually most characteristically represents in a later
conflict with Karel Absolon the transformation of Moravian “teaching and amateur” archaeology into a “pro-
fessional” scientific, university and institutionalized discipline. The proof that a clear result of such conflicts
is not also for the good of the thing itself are the methodologically better conducted research projects by Jan
Knies (e.g. washing cave sediments) or more farsighted approach to the chronology of the entire Moravian
Palaeolithic period. Also Josef Skutil continued to follow French archaeology for the entirety of the First Re-
pubic, who was eclipsed for a long time by Karel Absolon and perhaps also for that reason developed a wide
270
CESTY MORAVSKfi PALEOLITICKE ARCHEOLOGIE V OBDOBi CESKOSLOVENSKE REPUBUKY
range of various marginal topics, including interesting discussions from the field of the history of archaeology.
What remained significant for Moravian researchers in that was also the traditional Viennese scientific centre,
concentrated around the Natural History Museum and University of Natural Resources and Applied Life
Sciences, whose authority often intervened in archaeological events in Moravia.
Despite these reservations, Moravian Palaeolithic archaeology at the time of the Czechoslovak Republic
played first violin and in terms of the popularity of this specific field enjoyed undeniably the most successful
period, its0golden age”. That was naturally thanks to the personality of Karel Absolon who was very gifted
with the media, and in that might have been ahead of his time by more than 50 years, when archaeology
chiefly from the 1990s tried with all of the possible promotion means to defend its right to existence and pu-
blic support. Moravian Palaeolithic archaeology became a component of the cultural policy of a young and
successful Central European state, which was sufficiently expressed by the building of an independent expo-
sition devoted again to Absolons excavations at the Exhibition of Contemporary Culture in Czechoslovakia
in Brno in 1928. The museum, like its planned scientific research centre Anthropos, was again created follo-
wing the best French examples (Musee de 1 'Homme in Paris). Moravian Palaeolithic lokalities were regularly
visited by leading European archaeologists. A very important moment was the organization of the congress
of the Institute International d'Anthropologie in Prague in 1924, which had the Moravian Palaeolithic era as
one of its main themes. The period of the 1920s and 1930s was also a period very rich in foreign contacts,
the exchange of ideas, collections and establishment of numerous personal friendships. At the beginning of
the integration of Czech archaeological research, there was a visit by the “pope of world Palaeolithic archaeo-
logy” Abbe Henri Breuil or the later friend of K. Absolon H. Begouen, D. Peyronie and a number of others.
In this context, we must notice the similarities with the general effort of our culture and policy, which sought
an equal partner precisely in the Republic of France and hence defined the particular and unrepeatable milieu
of interwar Czechoslovakia. As against other areas, Moravian archaeology, which was especially after the
creation of the Czechoslovak Socialist Republic interpreted mostly as a parallel to Bohemian prehistory, lived
its own life thanks to these successes in the research of the Palaeolithic era. It is therefore useful to follow it
also in these more general connections which created the identification models of the Czechoslovak nation.
It is natural that the research of our archaeology after 1918 is just in its beginnings. Also the presented
work focused mainly on the topic of the Moravian Palaeolithic era is in now way complete. Already in drawing
on the archival sources and study of other secondary sources a number of themes appeared that could not
be included in the work. It seems very noteworthy for instance to follow the reflection of archaeological re-
search in contemporary arts - prose, poetry, songs, caricatures and paintinsg, which significantly resonated
in this area between the world wars. Archaeology including the Palaeolithic became a society-wide topic
with marked potential. For instance, the influence of the archaeology (anthropology) of the USA, represented
in our conditions mainly by the rich contacts with Ales Hrdlicka and the visits of American archaeologists
to localities here remains as yet insufficiently researched. An independent chapter that is closely tied to the
period of the First Republic is the events connected with the period of the Second republic and the German
occupation of our state, when archaeology began to play a changed and again significant role. Within the
presented work, we coud devote ourselves to these themes only marginally and schematically. The great
wealth of treated and untreated archives and legacies hence only now offers a number of possibilities of how
to expand and deepen further research in the area of the history of archaeology.
271 |
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| author | Kostrhun, Petr 1979- |
| author_GND | (DE-588)136724183 |
| author_facet | Kostrhun, Petr 1979- |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Kostrhun, Petr 1979- |
| author_variant | p k pk |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV042530918 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)910477029 (DE-599)BVBBV042530918 |
| era | Geschichte 1918-1938 gnd |
| era_facet | Geschichte 1918-1938 |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nam a2200000 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV042530918</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20170213</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">150428s2014 ab|| |||| 00||| cze d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9788070284223</subfield><subfield code="9">978-80-7028-422-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)910477029</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV042530918</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">cze</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-29</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">7,41</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kostrhun, Petr</subfield><subfield code="d">1979-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)136724183</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Cesty moravské paleolitické archeologie v období Československé republiky</subfield><subfield code="c">Petr Kostrhun</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Brno</subfield><subfield code="b">Moravské Zemské Muzeum</subfield><subfield code="c">2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">339 S.</subfield><subfield code="b">zahlr. Ill. Kt.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zsfassung in engl. Sprache u.d.T.: The path of Moravian Palaeolithic archaeology at the time of the Czechoslovak republic 1918 - 1938</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="648" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Geschichte 1918-1938</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Paläolithikum</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4140148-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Archäologie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4002827-6</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Tschechoslowakei</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078435-6</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Mähren</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4074432-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Tschechoslowakei</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078435-6</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Mähren</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4074432-2</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Paläolithikum</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4140148-7</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Archäologie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4002827-6</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Geschichte 1918-1938</subfield><subfield code="A">z</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=027965143&sequence=000004&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=027965143&sequence=000005&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Literaturverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=027965143&sequence=000006&line_number=0003&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">370.9</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">0904</subfield><subfield code="g">4371</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">930.1</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">09012</subfield><subfield code="g">4371</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">930.1</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">0904</subfield><subfield code="g">4371</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-027965143</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | Tschechoslowakei (DE-588)4078435-6 gnd Mähren (DE-588)4074432-2 gnd |
| geographic_facet | Tschechoslowakei Mähren |
| id | DE-604.BV042530918 |
| illustrated | Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-10-18T18:11:27Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9788070284223 |
| language | Czech |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-027965143 |
| oclc_num | 910477029 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 DE-29 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 DE-29 |
| physical | 339 S. zahlr. Ill. Kt. |
| publishDate | 2014 |
| publishDateSearch | 2014 |
| publishDateSort | 2014 |
| publisher | Moravské Zemské Muzeum |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Kostrhun, Petr 1979- Verfasser (DE-588)136724183 aut Cesty moravské paleolitické archeologie v období Československé republiky Petr Kostrhun Brno Moravské Zemské Muzeum 2014 339 S. zahlr. Ill. Kt. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Zsfassung in engl. Sprache u.d.T.: The path of Moravian Palaeolithic archaeology at the time of the Czechoslovak republic 1918 - 1938 Geschichte 1918-1938 gnd rswk-swf Paläolithikum (DE-588)4140148-7 gnd rswk-swf Archäologie (DE-588)4002827-6 gnd rswk-swf Tschechoslowakei (DE-588)4078435-6 gnd rswk-swf Mähren (DE-588)4074432-2 gnd rswk-swf Tschechoslowakei (DE-588)4078435-6 g Mähren (DE-588)4074432-2 g Paläolithikum (DE-588)4140148-7 s Archäologie (DE-588)4002827-6 s Geschichte 1918-1938 z DE-604 Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=027965143&sequence=000004&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=027965143&sequence=000005&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Literaturverzeichnis Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=027965143&sequence=000006&line_number=0003&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Abstract |
| spellingShingle | Kostrhun, Petr 1979- Cesty moravské paleolitické archeologie v období Československé republiky Paläolithikum (DE-588)4140148-7 gnd Archäologie (DE-588)4002827-6 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4140148-7 (DE-588)4002827-6 (DE-588)4078435-6 (DE-588)4074432-2 |
| title | Cesty moravské paleolitické archeologie v období Československé republiky |
| title_auth | Cesty moravské paleolitické archeologie v období Československé republiky |
| title_exact_search | Cesty moravské paleolitické archeologie v období Československé republiky |
| title_full | Cesty moravské paleolitické archeologie v období Československé republiky Petr Kostrhun |
| title_fullStr | Cesty moravské paleolitické archeologie v období Československé republiky Petr Kostrhun |
| title_full_unstemmed | Cesty moravské paleolitické archeologie v období Československé republiky Petr Kostrhun |
| title_short | Cesty moravské paleolitické archeologie v období Československé republiky |
| title_sort | cesty moravske paleoliticke archeologie v obdobi ceskoslovenske republiky |
| topic | Paläolithikum (DE-588)4140148-7 gnd Archäologie (DE-588)4002827-6 gnd |
| topic_facet | Paläolithikum Archäologie Tschechoslowakei Mähren |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=027965143&sequence=000004&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=027965143&sequence=000005&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=027965143&sequence=000006&line_number=0003&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT kostrhunpetr cestymoravskepaleolitickearcheologievobdobiceskoslovenskerepubliky |