Political Questions Judicial Answers: Does the Rule of Law Apply to Foreign Affairs?
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Princeton, N.J.
Princeton University Press
1992
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext Volltext |
| Beschreibung: | Main description: Almost since the beginning of the republic, America's rigorous separation of powers among Executive, Legislative, and Judicial Branches has been umpired by the federal judiciary. It may seem surprising, then, that many otherwise ordinary cases are not decided in court even when they include allegations that the President, or Congress, has violated a law or the Constitution itself. Most of these orphan cases are shunned by the judiciary simply because they have foreign policy aspects. In refusing to address the issues involved, judges indicate that judicial review, like politics, should stop at the water's edge--and foreign policy managers find it convenient to agree! Thomas Franck, however, maintains that when courts invoke the "political question" doctrine to justify such reticence, they evade a constitutional duty. In his view, whether the government has acted constitutionally in sending men and women to die in foreign battles is just as appropriate an issue for a court to decide as whether property has been taken without due process. In this revisionist work, Franck proposes ways to subject the conduct of foreign policy to the rule of law without compromising either judicial integrity or the national interest. By examining the historical origins of the separation of powers in the American constitutional tradition, with comparative reference to the practices of judiciaries in other federal systems, he broadens and enriches discussions of an important national issue that has particular significance for critical debate about the "imperial presidency." |
| Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (212 S.) |
| ISBN: | 9781400820733 |
| DOI: | 10.1515/9781400820733 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV042521905 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 150423s1992 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9781400820733 |9 978-1-4008-2073-3 | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1515/9781400820733 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)704483592 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV042521905 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 100 | 1 | |a Franck, Thomas M. |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Political Questions Judicial Answers |b Does the Rule of Law Apply to Foreign Affairs? |
| 264 | 1 | |a Princeton, N.J. |b Princeton University Press |c 1992 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (212 S.) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Main description: Almost since the beginning of the republic, America's rigorous separation of powers among Executive, Legislative, and Judicial Branches has been umpired by the federal judiciary. It may seem surprising, then, that many otherwise ordinary cases are not decided in court even when they include allegations that the President, or Congress, has violated a law or the Constitution itself. Most of these orphan cases are shunned by the judiciary simply because they have foreign policy aspects. In refusing to address the issues involved, judges indicate that judicial review, like politics, should stop at the water's edge--and foreign policy managers find it convenient to agree! Thomas Franck, however, maintains that when courts invoke the "political question" doctrine to justify such reticence, they evade a constitutional duty. In his view, whether the government has acted constitutionally in sending men and women to die in foreign battles is just as appropriate an issue for a court to decide as whether property has been taken without due process. In this revisionist work, Franck proposes ways to subject the conduct of foreign policy to the rule of law without compromising either judicial integrity or the national interest. By examining the historical origins of the separation of powers in the American constitutional tradition, with comparative reference to the practices of judiciaries in other federal systems, he broadens and enriches discussions of an important national issue that has particular significance for critical debate about the "imperial presidency." | ||
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Rechtsprechung |0 (DE-588)4115710-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Außenpolitik |0 (DE-588)4003846-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 7 | |a USA |0 (DE-588)4078704-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Außenpolitik |0 (DE-588)4003846-4 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Rechtsprechung |0 (DE-588)4115710-2 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a USA |0 (DE-588)4078704-7 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | |8 1\p |5 DE-604 | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400820733 |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://www.degruyter.com/search?f_0=isbnissn&q_0=9781400820733&searchTitles=true |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a ZDB-23-DGG | ||
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-027956244 | ||
| 883 | 1 | |8 1\p |a cgwrk |d 20201028 |q DE-101 |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804153274460274688 |
|---|---|
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Franck, Thomas M. |
| author_facet | Franck, Thomas M. |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Franck, Thomas M. |
| author_variant | t m f tm tmf |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV042521905 |
| collection | ZDB-23-DGG |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)704483592 (DE-599)BVBBV042521905 |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1515/9781400820733 |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03071nmm a2200397zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV042521905</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">150423s1992 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781400820733</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-4008-2073-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1515/9781400820733</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)704483592</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV042521905</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Franck, Thomas M.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Political Questions Judicial Answers</subfield><subfield code="b">Does the Rule of Law Apply to Foreign Affairs?</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Princeton, N.J.</subfield><subfield code="b">Princeton University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">1992</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (212 S.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Main description: Almost since the beginning of the republic, America's rigorous separation of powers among Executive, Legislative, and Judicial Branches has been umpired by the federal judiciary. It may seem surprising, then, that many otherwise ordinary cases are not decided in court even when they include allegations that the President, or Congress, has violated a law or the Constitution itself. Most of these orphan cases are shunned by the judiciary simply because they have foreign policy aspects. In refusing to address the issues involved, judges indicate that judicial review, like politics, should stop at the water's edge--and foreign policy managers find it convenient to agree! Thomas Franck, however, maintains that when courts invoke the "political question" doctrine to justify such reticence, they evade a constitutional duty. In his view, whether the government has acted constitutionally in sending men and women to die in foreign battles is just as appropriate an issue for a court to decide as whether property has been taken without due process. In this revisionist work, Franck proposes ways to subject the conduct of foreign policy to the rule of law without compromising either judicial integrity or the national interest. By examining the historical origins of the separation of powers in the American constitutional tradition, with comparative reference to the practices of judiciaries in other federal systems, he broadens and enriches discussions of an important national issue that has particular significance for critical debate about the "imperial presidency."</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rechtsprechung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4115710-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Außenpolitik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4003846-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078704-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Außenpolitik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4003846-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Rechtsprechung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4115710-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078704-7</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400820733</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.degruyter.com/search?f_0=isbnissn&q_0=9781400820733&searchTitles=true</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-027956244</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="883" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="a">cgwrk</subfield><subfield code="d">20201028</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-101</subfield><subfield code="u">https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | USA (DE-588)4078704-7 gnd |
| geographic_facet | USA |
| id | DE-604.BV042521905 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T01:24:00Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9781400820733 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-027956244 |
| oclc_num | 704483592 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource (212 S.) |
| psigel | ZDB-23-DGG |
| publishDate | 1992 |
| publishDateSearch | 1992 |
| publishDateSort | 1992 |
| publisher | Princeton University Press |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Franck, Thomas M. Verfasser aut Political Questions Judicial Answers Does the Rule of Law Apply to Foreign Affairs? Princeton, N.J. Princeton University Press 1992 1 Online-Ressource (212 S.) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Main description: Almost since the beginning of the republic, America's rigorous separation of powers among Executive, Legislative, and Judicial Branches has been umpired by the federal judiciary. It may seem surprising, then, that many otherwise ordinary cases are not decided in court even when they include allegations that the President, or Congress, has violated a law or the Constitution itself. Most of these orphan cases are shunned by the judiciary simply because they have foreign policy aspects. In refusing to address the issues involved, judges indicate that judicial review, like politics, should stop at the water's edge--and foreign policy managers find it convenient to agree! Thomas Franck, however, maintains that when courts invoke the "political question" doctrine to justify such reticence, they evade a constitutional duty. In his view, whether the government has acted constitutionally in sending men and women to die in foreign battles is just as appropriate an issue for a court to decide as whether property has been taken without due process. In this revisionist work, Franck proposes ways to subject the conduct of foreign policy to the rule of law without compromising either judicial integrity or the national interest. By examining the historical origins of the separation of powers in the American constitutional tradition, with comparative reference to the practices of judiciaries in other federal systems, he broadens and enriches discussions of an important national issue that has particular significance for critical debate about the "imperial presidency." Rechtsprechung (DE-588)4115710-2 gnd rswk-swf Außenpolitik (DE-588)4003846-4 gnd rswk-swf USA (DE-588)4078704-7 gnd rswk-swf Außenpolitik (DE-588)4003846-4 s Rechtsprechung (DE-588)4115710-2 s USA (DE-588)4078704-7 g 1\p DE-604 https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400820733 Verlag Volltext http://www.degruyter.com/search?f_0=isbnissn&q_0=9781400820733&searchTitles=true Verlag Volltext 1\p cgwrk 20201028 DE-101 https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk |
| spellingShingle | Franck, Thomas M. Political Questions Judicial Answers Does the Rule of Law Apply to Foreign Affairs? Rechtsprechung (DE-588)4115710-2 gnd Außenpolitik (DE-588)4003846-4 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4115710-2 (DE-588)4003846-4 (DE-588)4078704-7 |
| title | Political Questions Judicial Answers Does the Rule of Law Apply to Foreign Affairs? |
| title_auth | Political Questions Judicial Answers Does the Rule of Law Apply to Foreign Affairs? |
| title_exact_search | Political Questions Judicial Answers Does the Rule of Law Apply to Foreign Affairs? |
| title_full | Political Questions Judicial Answers Does the Rule of Law Apply to Foreign Affairs? |
| title_fullStr | Political Questions Judicial Answers Does the Rule of Law Apply to Foreign Affairs? |
| title_full_unstemmed | Political Questions Judicial Answers Does the Rule of Law Apply to Foreign Affairs? |
| title_short | Political Questions Judicial Answers |
| title_sort | political questions judicial answers does the rule of law apply to foreign affairs |
| title_sub | Does the Rule of Law Apply to Foreign Affairs? |
| topic | Rechtsprechung (DE-588)4115710-2 gnd Außenpolitik (DE-588)4003846-4 gnd |
| topic_facet | Rechtsprechung Außenpolitik USA |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400820733 http://www.degruyter.com/search?f_0=isbnissn&q_0=9781400820733&searchTitles=true |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT franckthomasm politicalquestionsjudicialanswersdoestheruleoflawapplytoforeignaffairs |