Consensus Under Fuzziness:
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Boston, MA
Springer US
1997
|
Schriftenreihe: | International Series in Intelligent Technologies
10 |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Beschreibung: | We live, unfortunately, in turbulent and difficult times plagued by various political, economic, and social problems, as well as by natural disasters worldwide. Systems become more and more complicated, and this concerns all levels, exemplified first by global political alliances, groups of countries, regions, etc., and secondly, by multinational (global) corporations and companies of all sizes. These same concerns affect all social groups. This all makes decision processes very complicated. In virtually all decision processes in these complicated systems, there are various actors (decision makers) who represent individual subjects (persons, countries, companies, etc.) and their respective interest groups. To reach a meaningful (good) decision, opinions of all such actors must be taken into account or a given decision may be rejected and not implemented. Ideally, a decision would be made after a consensus between the parties involved had been attained. So, consensus is a very desirable situation. In most real-world cases there is considerable uncertainty concerning all aspects of the decision making process. Moreover, opinions, goals, constraints, etc. are usually imprecisely known. This makes the decision making process difficult as one cannot employ conventional "hard" tools |
Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (VIII, 303 p) |
ISBN: | 9781461563334 9781461379089 |
ISSN: | 1382-3434 |
DOI: | 10.1007/978-1-4615-6333-4 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zcb4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV042420918 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 150317s1997 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
020 | |a 9781461563334 |c Online |9 978-1-4615-6333-4 | ||
020 | |a 9781461379089 |c Print |9 978-1-4613-7908-9 | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/978-1-4615-6333-4 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (OCoLC)1165505960 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV042420918 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-384 |a DE-703 |a DE-91 |a DE-634 | ||
082 | 0 | |a 658.40301 |2 23 | |
084 | |a MAT 000 |2 stub | ||
100 | 1 | |a Kacprzyk, Janusz |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Consensus Under Fuzziness |c edited by Janusz Kacprzyk, Hannu Nurmi, Mario Fedrizzi |
264 | 1 | |a Boston, MA |b Springer US |c 1997 | |
300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (VIII, 303 p) | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 0 | |a International Series in Intelligent Technologies |v 10 |x 1382-3434 | |
500 | |a We live, unfortunately, in turbulent and difficult times plagued by various political, economic, and social problems, as well as by natural disasters worldwide. Systems become more and more complicated, and this concerns all levels, exemplified first by global political alliances, groups of countries, regions, etc., and secondly, by multinational (global) corporations and companies of all sizes. These same concerns affect all social groups. This all makes decision processes very complicated. In virtually all decision processes in these complicated systems, there are various actors (decision makers) who represent individual subjects (persons, countries, companies, etc.) and their respective interest groups. To reach a meaningful (good) decision, opinions of all such actors must be taken into account or a given decision may be rejected and not implemented. Ideally, a decision would be made after a consensus between the parties involved had been attained. So, consensus is a very desirable situation. In most real-world cases there is considerable uncertainty concerning all aspects of the decision making process. Moreover, opinions, goals, constraints, etc. are usually imprecisely known. This makes the decision making process difficult as one cannot employ conventional "hard" tools | ||
650 | 4 | |a Economics | |
650 | 4 | |a Logic, Symbolic and mathematical | |
650 | 4 | |a Operations research | |
650 | 4 | |a Economics/Management Science | |
650 | 4 | |a Operation Research/Decision Theory | |
650 | 4 | |a Mathematical Logic and Foundations | |
650 | 4 | |a Management | |
650 | 4 | |a Wirtschaft | |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Gruppenentscheidung |0 (DE-588)4158442-9 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Fuzzy-Logik |0 (DE-588)4341284-1 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Konsens |0 (DE-588)4010504-0 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Entscheidung bei Unsicherheit |0 (DE-588)4070864-0 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
655 | 7 | |8 1\p |0 (DE-588)4143413-4 |a Aufsatzsammlung |2 gnd-content | |
689 | 0 | 0 | |a Gruppenentscheidung |0 (DE-588)4158442-9 |D s |
689 | 0 | 1 | |a Konsens |0 (DE-588)4010504-0 |D s |
689 | 0 | 2 | |a Entscheidung bei Unsicherheit |0 (DE-588)4070864-0 |D s |
689 | 0 | 3 | |a Fuzzy-Logik |0 (DE-588)4341284-1 |D s |
689 | 0 | |8 2\p |5 DE-604 | |
700 | 1 | |a Nurmi, Hannu |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Fedrizzi, Mario |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6333-4 |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
912 | |a ZDB-2-SMA |a ZDB-2-BAE | ||
940 | 1 | |q ZDB-2-SMA_Archive | |
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-027856335 | ||
883 | 1 | |8 1\p |a cgwrk |d 20201028 |q DE-101 |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk | |
883 | 1 | |8 2\p |a cgwrk |d 20201028 |q DE-101 |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804153093404753920 |
---|---|
any_adam_object | |
author | Kacprzyk, Janusz |
author_facet | Kacprzyk, Janusz |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Kacprzyk, Janusz |
author_variant | j k jk |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV042420918 |
classification_tum | MAT 000 |
collection | ZDB-2-SMA ZDB-2-BAE |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1165505960 (DE-599)BVBBV042420918 |
dewey-full | 658.40301 |
dewey-hundreds | 600 - Technology (Applied sciences) |
dewey-ones | 658 - General management |
dewey-raw | 658.40301 |
dewey-search | 658.40301 |
dewey-sort | 3658.40301 |
dewey-tens | 650 - Management and auxiliary services |
discipline | Mathematik Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/978-1-4615-6333-4 |
format | Electronic eBook |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03662nmm a2200625zcb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV042420918</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">150317s1997 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781461563334</subfield><subfield code="c">Online</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-4615-6333-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781461379089</subfield><subfield code="c">Print</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-4613-7908-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/978-1-4615-6333-4</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1165505960</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV042420918</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-384</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-703</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-91</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-634</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">658.40301</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MAT 000</subfield><subfield code="2">stub</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kacprzyk, Janusz</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Consensus Under Fuzziness</subfield><subfield code="c">edited by Janusz Kacprzyk, Hannu Nurmi, Mario Fedrizzi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Boston, MA</subfield><subfield code="b">Springer US</subfield><subfield code="c">1997</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (VIII, 303 p)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">International Series in Intelligent Technologies</subfield><subfield code="v">10</subfield><subfield code="x">1382-3434</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">We live, unfortunately, in turbulent and difficult times plagued by various political, economic, and social problems, as well as by natural disasters worldwide. Systems become more and more complicated, and this concerns all levels, exemplified first by global political alliances, groups of countries, regions, etc., and secondly, by multinational (global) corporations and companies of all sizes. These same concerns affect all social groups. This all makes decision processes very complicated. In virtually all decision processes in these complicated systems, there are various actors (decision makers) who represent individual subjects (persons, countries, companies, etc.) and their respective interest groups. To reach a meaningful (good) decision, opinions of all such actors must be taken into account or a given decision may be rejected and not implemented. Ideally, a decision would be made after a consensus between the parties involved had been attained. So, consensus is a very desirable situation. In most real-world cases there is considerable uncertainty concerning all aspects of the decision making process. Moreover, opinions, goals, constraints, etc. are usually imprecisely known. This makes the decision making process difficult as one cannot employ conventional "hard" tools</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Economics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Logic, Symbolic and mathematical</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Operations research</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Economics/Management Science</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Operation Research/Decision Theory</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Mathematical Logic and Foundations</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Management</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Wirtschaft</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Gruppenentscheidung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4158442-9</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Fuzzy-Logik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4341284-1</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Konsens</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4010504-0</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Entscheidung bei Unsicherheit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4070864-0</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4143413-4</subfield><subfield code="a">Aufsatzsammlung</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd-content</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Gruppenentscheidung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4158442-9</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Konsens</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4010504-0</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Entscheidung bei Unsicherheit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4070864-0</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Fuzzy-Logik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4341284-1</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">2\p</subfield><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nurmi, Hannu</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Fedrizzi, Mario</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6333-4</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-2-SMA</subfield><subfield code="a">ZDB-2-BAE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">ZDB-2-SMA_Archive</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-027856335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="883" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="a">cgwrk</subfield><subfield code="d">20201028</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-101</subfield><subfield code="u">https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="883" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">2\p</subfield><subfield code="a">cgwrk</subfield><subfield code="d">20201028</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-101</subfield><subfield code="u">https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
genre | 1\p (DE-588)4143413-4 Aufsatzsammlung gnd-content |
genre_facet | Aufsatzsammlung |
id | DE-604.BV042420918 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-07-10T01:21:07Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 9781461563334 9781461379089 |
issn | 1382-3434 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-027856335 |
oclc_num | 1165505960 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-384 DE-703 DE-91 DE-BY-TUM DE-634 |
owner_facet | DE-384 DE-703 DE-91 DE-BY-TUM DE-634 |
physical | 1 Online-Ressource (VIII, 303 p) |
psigel | ZDB-2-SMA ZDB-2-BAE ZDB-2-SMA_Archive |
publishDate | 1997 |
publishDateSearch | 1997 |
publishDateSort | 1997 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | marc |
series2 | International Series in Intelligent Technologies |
spelling | Kacprzyk, Janusz Verfasser aut Consensus Under Fuzziness edited by Janusz Kacprzyk, Hannu Nurmi, Mario Fedrizzi Boston, MA Springer US 1997 1 Online-Ressource (VIII, 303 p) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier International Series in Intelligent Technologies 10 1382-3434 We live, unfortunately, in turbulent and difficult times plagued by various political, economic, and social problems, as well as by natural disasters worldwide. Systems become more and more complicated, and this concerns all levels, exemplified first by global political alliances, groups of countries, regions, etc., and secondly, by multinational (global) corporations and companies of all sizes. These same concerns affect all social groups. This all makes decision processes very complicated. In virtually all decision processes in these complicated systems, there are various actors (decision makers) who represent individual subjects (persons, countries, companies, etc.) and their respective interest groups. To reach a meaningful (good) decision, opinions of all such actors must be taken into account or a given decision may be rejected and not implemented. Ideally, a decision would be made after a consensus between the parties involved had been attained. So, consensus is a very desirable situation. In most real-world cases there is considerable uncertainty concerning all aspects of the decision making process. Moreover, opinions, goals, constraints, etc. are usually imprecisely known. This makes the decision making process difficult as one cannot employ conventional "hard" tools Economics Logic, Symbolic and mathematical Operations research Economics/Management Science Operation Research/Decision Theory Mathematical Logic and Foundations Management Wirtschaft Gruppenentscheidung (DE-588)4158442-9 gnd rswk-swf Fuzzy-Logik (DE-588)4341284-1 gnd rswk-swf Konsens (DE-588)4010504-0 gnd rswk-swf Entscheidung bei Unsicherheit (DE-588)4070864-0 gnd rswk-swf 1\p (DE-588)4143413-4 Aufsatzsammlung gnd-content Gruppenentscheidung (DE-588)4158442-9 s Konsens (DE-588)4010504-0 s Entscheidung bei Unsicherheit (DE-588)4070864-0 s Fuzzy-Logik (DE-588)4341284-1 s 2\p DE-604 Nurmi, Hannu Sonstige oth Fedrizzi, Mario Sonstige oth https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6333-4 Verlag Volltext 1\p cgwrk 20201028 DE-101 https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk 2\p cgwrk 20201028 DE-101 https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk |
spellingShingle | Kacprzyk, Janusz Consensus Under Fuzziness Economics Logic, Symbolic and mathematical Operations research Economics/Management Science Operation Research/Decision Theory Mathematical Logic and Foundations Management Wirtschaft Gruppenentscheidung (DE-588)4158442-9 gnd Fuzzy-Logik (DE-588)4341284-1 gnd Konsens (DE-588)4010504-0 gnd Entscheidung bei Unsicherheit (DE-588)4070864-0 gnd |
subject_GND | (DE-588)4158442-9 (DE-588)4341284-1 (DE-588)4010504-0 (DE-588)4070864-0 (DE-588)4143413-4 |
title | Consensus Under Fuzziness |
title_auth | Consensus Under Fuzziness |
title_exact_search | Consensus Under Fuzziness |
title_full | Consensus Under Fuzziness edited by Janusz Kacprzyk, Hannu Nurmi, Mario Fedrizzi |
title_fullStr | Consensus Under Fuzziness edited by Janusz Kacprzyk, Hannu Nurmi, Mario Fedrizzi |
title_full_unstemmed | Consensus Under Fuzziness edited by Janusz Kacprzyk, Hannu Nurmi, Mario Fedrizzi |
title_short | Consensus Under Fuzziness |
title_sort | consensus under fuzziness |
topic | Economics Logic, Symbolic and mathematical Operations research Economics/Management Science Operation Research/Decision Theory Mathematical Logic and Foundations Management Wirtschaft Gruppenentscheidung (DE-588)4158442-9 gnd Fuzzy-Logik (DE-588)4341284-1 gnd Konsens (DE-588)4010504-0 gnd Entscheidung bei Unsicherheit (DE-588)4070864-0 gnd |
topic_facet | Economics Logic, Symbolic and mathematical Operations research Economics/Management Science Operation Research/Decision Theory Mathematical Logic and Foundations Management Wirtschaft Gruppenentscheidung Fuzzy-Logik Konsens Entscheidung bei Unsicherheit Aufsatzsammlung |
url | https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6333-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kacprzykjanusz consensusunderfuzziness AT nurmihannu consensusunderfuzziness AT fedrizzimario consensusunderfuzziness |